634x258 Scout Notes
9 March 2016 850 comments
James Barnes James Barnes
Share:

Arsenal clinch a place in the FA Cup quarter finals and reduce the Gameweek 30 fixture list to just five matches. Diego Costa is back in training for Chelsea, Everton have worries over Aaron Lennon’s hamstring, City’s Kevin de Bruyne steps up his injury recovery, whilst Ryan Shawcross could be in line to return for Stoke at home to Southampton this weekend.

Arsenal through to quarters

Olivier Giroud and Theo Walcott both bagged braces as Arsenal put Hull City to the sword in a 4-0 thrashing. Arsene Wenger enacted six changes for the FA Cup replay and elected to leave Alexis Sanchez and Mesut Ozil on the bench for the entirety of the match-up. In truth, the French manager’s substitutions were forced, given that Per Mertesacker (concussion, cut), Gabriel Paulista (hamstring) and Aaron Ramsey (thigh) were all withdrawn at various points due to injury. Although Wenger believes the former two should be fine, he expressed greater concern for the health of Ramsey:

“I’m a bit shocked – we lost our two centre-backs in the game and after we lost Aaron Ramsey. Mertesacker has a cut on his eye and a bit of concussion but he should be fine and Gabriel looks alright. Ramsey I’m a bit more concerned because it’s a muscular thigh injury. Apart from that we have played well.”

The Scout Says: As a consequence of their victory at the KC Stadium, Arsenal will now host Watford on Sunday in the quarter finals, resulting in the postponement of their Gameweek 30 tie against West Bromwich Albion. Although some Fantasy managers will feel inclined to part company with their Gunners recruits in an attempt to field a stronger unit on the weekend, it’s worth noting that Arsenal travel to face Everton – who rank top for goals conceded in home fixtures (26) – in the subsequent round of fixtures. Furthermore, Wenger’s troupe could conceivably have a double Gameweek 34, discouraging non-wildcarders from releasing the likes of Mesut Ozil. On the flip side, Arsenal’s fresh injuries decrease our confidence in a back line that conceded eight goals and the joint-third-most big chances (nine) across the last four Gameweeks; indeed, they’ll do well to silence an Everton offense that charts second for home goals (29).

Mixed injury news for Chelsea

Diego Costa (minor tendon), Pedro (hamstring) and Kenedy (groin) look to have recovered from their respective injuries and trained ahead of Chelsea’s Champions League clash against Paris Saint-Germain. Meanwhile, John Terry couldn’t shake off his hamstring injury in time for the European encounter.

The Scout Says: Despite scoring in seven of his last ten league outings, Costa (10.8) currently lies at a modest 11% ownership – a likely reflection of the fact that many managers already possess two high-priced forwards in Harry Kane and Sergio Aguero, while Jamie Vardy comes in far cheaper. Nonetheless, the former Atletico Madrid frontman harbours strong differential potential beyond the Blues’ Gameweek 30 blank, with three agreeable fixtures (WHU, avl, swa) on the Londoners’ horizon. Pedro’s likely return to the fold adds competition to the attacking midfield roles behind his fellow Spain international. The former Barcelona man netted twice in the recent 5-1 win over Newcastle before limping off early in the following week’s win over Southampton. His prohibitive 8.8 price tag, compared to Willian’s 7.2 is likely to keep him on the Fantasy periphery, though, given that the latter has served up two goals and seven assists since the departure of Jose Mourinho.

Midfield concerns for Toffees

Roberto Martinez offered a squad update on Tuesday morning. The Toffees boss is optimistic that Gareth Barry and Tom Cleverley will recover from chest infections in time for Everton’s FA Cup clash against Chelsea, though is a little more worried over the in-form Aaron Lennon:

“Aaron is the player that we need to monitor. His hamstring is really tight and he has put enormous effort into the last two games. Over the next 48 hours we will find out a bit more about Aaron. Apart from those three concerns, everyone is the same.”

The Scout Says: Lennon has been a revelation since his permanent transfer to the Toffees, adding a clinical touch that was conspicuously absent during his time with Tottenham Hotspur. In fact, the winger has already matched his best goal haul for Spurs (five) in around a third of the time (847 minutes compared to 2522 in the 2008/09 season), underlining his vast improvement in the final third. Delving deeper into the stats, however, exposes the unsustainable rate of his current scoring: Lennon lays claim to a 50% shot-conversion rate, having posted an attempt frequency (one every 89.8 minutes) that’s in line with the likes of Mousa Dembele (95) and Emre Can (90). Moreover, prospective investors will be wary that Everton lock horns with two of the league’s top-four defences (Arsenal, Manchester United) after their blank next Gameweek, reducing his differential appeal.

De Bruyne steps up recovery

According to reports, Kevin De Bruyne is on schedule to make his comeback in early April, having stepped up his rehabilitation this week.

Elsewhere in the Manchester City camp, Manuel Pellegrini said that David Silva is still feeling the ill effects of his recent ankle complaint:

“David is coming back from a long… I can’t say an injury, because it’s a pain in his ankle. He’s trying to improve as much as he can, but he continues to play when he is not 100 per cent comfortable. He did it well against Aston Villa and I hope if he is 100 per cent he will continue improving, but he is still feeling the pain.”

The Scout Says: Assuming that De Bruyne meets his projected return date, the Belgium international would be in contention for the double Gameweeks – the biggest of which are mostly likely to fall in Gameweeks 34 and 37. At present, De Bruyne possesses a ppg (5.5) that far exceeds the likes of Yaya Toure (4.6) and Silva (4.2), reaffirming his status as the prime selection among Manchester City’s midfield contingent. The latter two could soon steal that crown, though, given that Pellegrini’s men enjoy two favourable road trips (nor, bou) and a home encounter against their closest rivals across the next three Gameweeks. Certainly, with only ten teams duking it out in Gameweek 30, many managers will be contemplating tripling up on Man City assets following their 4-0 evisceration of Villa, though the Silva news is likely to see many lean towards Toure as a short-term pick instead.

Shawcross boost for Potters

Stoke City’s assistant boss, Mark Bowen, revealed that Ryan Shawcross came through a full training session unscathed, priming him for a return against Southampton this weekend:

“Ryan has trained for the first time with the group and came through quite an intensive session. It was always the plan to pull him out about two-thirds of the way through, so now we’ll see how the back settles down after that. We are back in on Thursday and hopefully Ryan will be ready to go again.”

In further good news for the Staffordshire outfit, Charlie Adam clocked over 70 minutes for the U21s as he accelerates his fitness programme.

The Scout Says: Shawcross’ return to the starting XI would serve as a timely boost for a rearguard that’s been hamstrung by injuries of late. That being said, the Potters have improved defensively since a three-match sticky spell from Gameweek 23 (nine goals conceded in three outings), shipping just three goals in their previous four match-ups. Ally that with Stoke’s promising schedule (SOU, wat, SWA) and Jack Butland’s 25% ownership will be quietly confident regarding their clean-sheet prospects. Shifting our focus onto the Potters’ midfield, Adam’s possible return is likely to have little impact on Mark Hughes’ starting XI. Instead, Marko Arnautovic ranks top by some margin for goals (nine) and charts a close second for assists (four), making him the standout pick. Xherdan Shaqiri is also worth a mention: the 6.4-priced Switzerland international carded attacking returns (one goal, two assists) in three of his last four starts and places joint-fourth among all midfielders for key passes (12) over the previous four Gameweeks.

850 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Sweetpea
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Morning all.

    What to do with Jon Walters?

    Didn't play at weekend and haven't heard a sausage why!

    1. Epic Fail
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      See what happens in the press conference.

  2. jmcclory123
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Does anyone else think Giroud is a pretty poor striker? I know his value for money is great but I don't think Arsenal will ever succeed with him as their main striker

    1. Epic Fail
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Succeed at what? He's decent enough to help get them top 4. They won't win the CL with a better striker.

      1. RustyBz
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        They could win the premier league with a better striker. I think they probably would if they had Lukaku for example

        1. Epic Fail
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          I know what you mean. Thing is though pretty much the same can be said for all clubs. They can all improve in some way.

          1. RustyBz
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            But other teams have been investing to improve. Arsenal have had this deficiency in their spine for years and years and everyone will tell you they need a Striker & defensive CM.

            They've FINALLY got in a good Keeper, but that will only get them so far.

            1. RustyBz
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              United need a striker and went and spent 30 odd mil on a 18 year old. City needed to bring you players and blew their wallet on KDB & Sterling. Liverpool went and spent 30 odd on Benteke.

              They're not all going to succeed but the point is Wenger didn't try. This team isn't good enough

              1. Epic Fail
                • 15 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                The Benteke flop possibly shows how it can turn out. We don't know if Wenger and Co were trying behind the scenes to get someone in. Maybe the players they could get weren't the right fit.

                Unlikely though, I think Wenger just doesn't care enough. He's happy trundling along.

                1. RustyBz
                  • 10 Years
                  9 years, 9 months ago

                  He's stubborn. They might have been trying but to be the only team to not even sign an outfield player in the summer isn't good enough.

                  1. jmcclory123
                    • 12 Years
                    9 years, 9 months ago

                    Wenger constantly preaches about cohesion in a team which is built over time rather than trying to buy a miracle. But Arsenal have been punished year upon year with mediocrity, finishing fourth while the competitors push on and add to their squads. Cech, Ozil and Sanchez have all been fantastic buys to be fair to Wenger though, but it's just not enough.

              2. getfunky
                • 13 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                In the past when the strength of the big teams was stronger I'd agree but liverpool & utd have spent an awful lot in recent yrs & they're still crap & City have been incredibly inconsistent.... money isn't necassarily the answer, it's what you do with the players that counts. Leicester are sitting pretty at the top with a squad that cost what? 20m to assemble? yet Arsenal need to invest 30m on a striker to win the league? nah, that doesn't wash for me. That's not to say I think youre wrong when you say that those are areas Arsneal can improve cos as you say that's been obvious for yrs, I just dont think it's the reason why they're not winning the league... the issue is wenger's inability to get the best out of the team.

                1. RustyBz
                  • 10 Years
                  9 years, 9 months ago

                  Maybe he has got the best out of players like Giroud... and that best just isn't good enough.

                  Something needs to change if Arsenal want to win the league

                  1. getfunky
                    • 13 Years
                    9 years, 9 months ago

                    yeah wenger

      2. jmcclory123
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Arsenal effectively have thrown away this season, a season they should have one and the best opportunity they have had in years. When the push came to shove Giroud went missing and didn't score since the 13th of January and no it's not entirely his fault. But when your main goal scorer isn't scoring you can't expect to push on for a title

    2. RustyBz
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      He's solid, but not good enough for a team like Arsenal.

      He's fine against mediocre teams but he's never going to win serious games for Arsenal. By that I mean you have 0 hope of him going to Camp Nou and getting a brace a putting Arsenal through whilst someone like Aguero gives you that

      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Our problems go way deeper than Giroud. Since Coq-zorla got injured we've got from playing like Champions to playing like a 7th placed side not good enough for a Europa spot. With our engine gone, Flamsey haven't been good enough back up.

  3. DrunkPhilosophy
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Butland McCarthy
    Francis Williams Huth Alderweild Vvd
    Payet Siggy Ozil Mahrez Alli
    Vardy Kane Aguero
    2 FT, 1.3 itb

    A) McCartny --> Robles
    B) Vvd --> Kompany
    C) Francis --> Daniels
    D) Other

    1. bitm2007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      C if you are planning to WC before GW30, otherwise B

      1. bitm2007
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        GW34

  4. Lateriser 12
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Its been a while.

    Roberto Firmino.

    1. Buck The Trent
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      reported

    2. Piggs Boson
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      He's a blanker though 😉

      1. Lateriser 12
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        usually follows up with a double digit after one 😉

        1. Spike ⚽️
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          His goal against Palace was gifted by Hennessey. He did nothing up to that moment

          1. Lateriser 12
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 13 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            But he did. Got a 9.5 ppg in his 7 starts before that. Collecting the highest goals and assists combined for any player in 2016.

            1. Hy liverpool
              • 12 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              shhhhhhh

          2. Hy liverpool
            • 12 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            he played well that game and that was MCcarthy btw

          3. Mark-O
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Barkley moment.

  5. Cheeseoid
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    What is the deal with Danny Roses injury anyway? Him and Fonte have really screwed me.

    1. Moin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Was about to ask the same question...Is Danny Rose confirmed out?

      1. Cheeseoid
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        People were talking about a medium term injury last I checked. By I don't know. Of they wouldn't risk him even if it is something small as Davies is an excellent replacement.

        1. Lateriser 12
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          I'm guessing today there should be a press conference.

          1. Moin
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 12 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Ooh Great! will wait for that! thanks!

            1. Cheeseoid
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 13 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Hopefully. We won't learn anything from Europe anyway as Davies is due to play.

              1. Moin
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 12 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                Yeah..we can just hope he gives an update on Rose..

    2. oghash
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      No lube?

      1. Cheeseoid
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        It feels like it.

    3. Piggs Boson
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      No eye deer. We'll have to see what Poch says in the presser.

      1. Cheeseoid
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Thanks GB. Hopefully it is unambiguous whatever he says

  6. A Defender's Nightmare
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Silva vs Yaya- What's the consensus?

    Can't find any related hot-topic.

    1. Lateriser 12
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      There isn't one. Which makes them both good options. I prefer David.

    2. Epic Fail
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Nothing in it other than price and gut.

      1. Moin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        This

    3. Piggs Boson
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Flip a coin. I think it'll come down to luck.

    4. Epic Fail
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Though I went for Sterling 😎

      1. A Defender's Nightmare
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Yikes! 😉

        What's your justification?

        1. Epic Fail
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          He's crap at finishing, but no other Man City player gets into better positions than him, which showed when he came on vs Villa. Plus he's had his 'rest' so I'm hoping he's good for more minutes. If he gets the minutes I would bet on him outscoring them all. Risky though.

          1. A Defender's Nightmare
            • 13 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Yeah may be but he has been benched quite a lot by Pellegrini. When De Bruyne returns the problem could become even bigger. I feel even Yaya hasn't been that integral to the team this season but think he's more safe than Sterling. Isn't he still 2nd in Penalty taking pecking order? Could come in handy if Aguero gets subbed off frequently ahead of busy schedule.

            1. Epic Fail
              • 15 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Yeah I wouldn't actually suggest Sterling to anyone. He's by far the biggest risk. He who dares though, Rodders.

              If I had to pick between the other 2 I would go with Silva, but there really is nothing in it. Though your point about Yaya being on pens when Kun is off is a good one.

              1. A Defender's Nightmare
                • 13 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                Cheers, Epic. Much appreciated.

    5. A Defender's Nightmare
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Cheers, all.

  7. The Wise Owl
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    What would you do with this team?

    Butland & DDG*
    Fuchs, Alderweireld, van Dijk, Bellerin* & Ward*
    Mahrez, Sigurdsson, Payet*, Alli & Ozil*
    Ighalo*, Vardy & Aguero

    1FT 3.8

    I'm thinking, Ighalo to Kane and Payet to Ritchie. Anyone have a better idea?

    1. Gooner Kebab
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Iggy to kane seem obvious

      1. The Wise Owl
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Thanks, though it leaves me 0.8 short.

    2. Individual
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Hi Wise Owl!

      Sorry, had to do something - here we go

      I think Iggie to Kane is a must.

      I'd be reticent to get rid of Payet - I think he's pretty fixture proof, and is playing well in order to get into the French team at the EUROs. I'd be more tempted to remove Ozil for another City player, like you've advised me, or maybe look at removing Bellerin (or, ideally, Ward if you can afford it!) for Kompany and playing 433?

      Hope that helps!

      1. The Wise Owl
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Thanks mate!

    3. HupHaalandHup
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Iggy to Kane should be the correct move here IMO.

  8. HupHaalandHup
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Hi guys,

    First of all, I would like to thank you guys for contributing to this site. It has been an asset this season.

    I am currently ranked 9k OR, and leading my ML by 15 pts. I have BB, TC and WC still available, and my main goal is to win ML.

    I can field 11 players this GW(5-2-3), which I doubt my rivals will be able to without using WC or taking massive hits. So things are looking good. 🙂

    My team looks like this:

    Butland - Hennesey*
    Francis - Kompany - Simpson - Toby - VvD
    Alli - Mahrez - Payet* - Özil* - Willian*
    Vardy - Aguero - Kane

    * GW30 blank.
    1 FT 0.0 ITB

    Should I:

    A: Save
    B: Willian -> Siggy(straight swap value wise)
    C: Other

    Feedback on other areas much appreciated.

    Cheers

    1. The Wise Owl
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I'd save.

    2. Respect My Authoritah
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      A.

      VVD isn't a great option, but there's still a chance of a cleanie and/or goal

    3. HupHaalandHup
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Thanks for the replies. I think I'll save. Was leaning towards that, and it might help me save my WC till after GW34.

    4. Wetdream
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      B.

      1. HupHaalandHup
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Only thing stopping me, is Chelsea vs AVL in GW32.. And also UCL with possible injuries. Should probably look to Costa by then, but that's that.

        Should get Sigg before next GW anyway. Might consider Payet or Willian out.

  9. Salah Fingers
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    I can field 11 this week but want to get Kompany in so one defender covers the bench.

    Which 4 would you pick to start? Currently on Bellerin out for Kompany.

    A - Kompany
    B - VvD
    C - Bellerin
    D - Williams
    E - Simpson
    F - Alder

    1. Lateriser 12
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Don't sell Bellerin.

      1. Salah Fingers
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Do you think it's worth me even getting Kompany in?

        The rest of my team is:

        Butland

        Mahrez - Alli - Sigurdson

        Aguero - Vardy - Kane

        1. Lateriser 12
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Find another route.

  10. pundit of punts
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Defense atm -

    Foster - McCarthy
    Alderweireld - Azpilicueta - Wollscheid - Nyom - Simpson

    2.7m in the bank. Need a gk. So, what's the best move here?

    A. McCarthy ➡ Hart/Fabianski
    B. Foster ➡ Hart/Fabianski

    Would be WCing in gw 33. So need a gk for next 3 gws.

    1. Lateriser 12
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I like A (Hart)

    2. Hy liverpool
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      A

    3. pundit of punts
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Cheers both.

  11. DGW 34 v 37 - the starts conundrum
    GreenWindmill
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Just been researching the suggestion that rotation will be more of a factor in DGW37 than in DGW34 with a view to considering the best time to WC. It seems to be a logical premise and the stats back it up.

    I went back over the last 4 seasons (to 2011/12) and reviewed starts/appearances for all players who played at least 1 minute in late season DGWs.

    Summary tables below but long story short - fewer players will start or appear twice in DGW37 than in DGW34 because teams rotate more at that point.

    Players by Number of Appearances in DGWs in last 4 seasons:
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    DGW---1 Appearance---2 Appearances---% Appearing Twice
    ---33-------------23-------------------57--------------------71.25%-----
    ---34-------------27-------------------96--------------------78.05%-----
    ---35--------------6--------------------25--------------------80.65%-----
    ---36-------------88------------------150--------------------63.03%-----
    ---37-------------46-------------------88--------------------65.67%-----

    Players by Number of Starts in DGWs in last 4 seasons:
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    DGW---0 Starts---1 Start---2 Starts---% Starting Twice
    ---33--------17----------16---------47--------------58.75%----
    ---34--------21----------28---------74--------------60.16%----
    ---35---------5------------8---------18--------------58.06%----
    ---36--------36----------96--------106-------------44.54%----
    ---37--------22----------48---------64--------------47.76%----

    I can slice the data other ways if it's of interest but the above was what I was really after.

    1. Lateriser 12
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Thanks for this. Not too much in it though eh GWM?

      1. GreenWindmill
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Well with a DGW34 player you've got a 78% chance of 2 appearances. That drops to 66% in DGW37. Sizeable difference to me.

        1. GreenWindmill
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          So a BB with 15 DGW in GW34 would see you probably have 12 'true' DGW players.

          That would drop to 10 in GW37.

          This is all assuming a random selection of players of course - it might be possible to stack the odds in your favour depending on team news.

    2. TheTinman
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      It's good data, but perhaps link it to a Google sheet or something? Doesn't fit that well into a comments box

      1. oghash
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Looks fine to me

      2. GreenWindmill
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        I could do but my spreadsheet is relatively busy and I just wanted to present the above.

        A screenshot more helpful? http://i.imgur.com/bEGSq9U.png

    3. Piggs Boson
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Does this affect our triple C and bench boost choice? I think it might...

      1. GreenWindmill
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        That's where I was going with this - when to WC/BB/TC. I like the idea of hanging onto Leic/Tot assets for longer then wildcarding late and BB in DGW37 but the higher chance of rotation makes that a much riskier game.

        1. Kings of Lyon ★
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Agreed. I think this points to the GW33 WC with BB in GW34

        2. Piggs Boson
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Yeah, with the triple C you can pick someone who's sure to start both. Easy to do.

          I'm favouring the GW34 bench boost atm, depending on fixtures.

        3. Lateriser 12
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          There is also a Triple C chance with Lukaku Later on.

          1. GreenWindmill
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            I'd assume he'd definitely see rotation if a TGW materialised but yes, having the TC chip saved until last could be a big help.

          2. The Hindu Monkey
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            barkley...

        4. Lateriser 12
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          If a decent team cant be planned for 35,36 and 37 with an early WC, then i would want to save the WC for later too.

          1. GreenWindmill
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            I think my tactic might be to wildcard in GW33 retaining a couple of players from each of Tottenham and Leicester and use bench boost in DGW34. Should be easy to negotiate subsequent gameweeks and turn out a decent team in DGW37 with a TC to play.

            I realise I won't achieve the holy grail of 15 DGW players but I honestly think having Leicester and Spurs assets for longer is worth it.

            1. Belalugozi78
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              How many DGWers you can have to be able to play 11 in GW35. 12?

              1. GreenWindmill
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 14 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                We need confirmation on the actual DGWs and blanks yet - still a couple of unknowns as far as I'm aware.

              2. BbBb
                • 10 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                You can likely have 15 DGW players in week 34 and still play 11 in GW35 then use FT's to have 10/11 DGW players in week 37...

                "My ideal way to run this would be with this WC in gameweek 33
                3 Liverpool players
                8 players with a dgw in 34 and a fixture in 35
                4 players with dgw34, blank 35, dgw 37

                This allows a 15 player BB in gameweek 34.

                Then having rolled the week 34 transfer you can make one housekeeping transfer in week 35 while still getting 11 players out. Then you use your rolled FT from 35 and your transfers from 36 and 37 and you get something like this:

                3 Liverpool players
                5 players who had dgw 34, a fixture in 35 and a single gameweek in 37
                7 players with dgw34 had no fixture in 35 and dgw37

                This results in 10 dgw players for gameweek 37 having had a BB15 in week 34 and 11 players in week 35.

                IF Man City vs Newcastle is in GW37 then conceivably your housekeeping transfer in week 35 can get in an 11th DGWer for gameweek 37."

                1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
                  • 10 Years
                  9 years, 9 months ago

                  Top one is a bit tricky if Watford and West Brom end up being the only teams with a DGW34 and a game in GW35

              3. Dino
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 16 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                15

            2. niloh1
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Hey man thanks a lot for the analysis. while i agree with you, maybe using BB would be better for GW34, city only has 1 DGW right? I would assume that Aguero is the best candidate of using the TC on cuz well hes aguero. so surely using a TC on someone else wouldnt be as good? I dno, I could be wrong, I was always planning on saving my TC on Aguero when he had a DGW, but it seems right now using the BB on DGW34 is a better option.

      2. BbBb
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        yes, surely means that GW34 is best suited to bench boost and GW37 a nailed on triple captain who's unlikely to be rotated

        1. GreenWindmill
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Yep, agreed. I don't think it's any revelation, most had already reached this conclusion anyway but I thought I'd run the numbers and see if it stacked up.

    4. Piggs Boson
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      This needs a hulk. Useful stats!

    5. 11 Angry Men
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      This is very helpful, particularly for BB. So may have pinned their hopes on WC then BB and so will be gutted if they only get 9-10 out rather than 14-15.

      I was aiming for GW34 BB after WC and this tends to reinforce that.

      Thanks!

      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Amazing stuff GW, you may have made a decision a lot easier.

      1. GreenWindmill
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Lol @ 'amazing' coming from you Balders - this is childs play compared to the research/effort/stats/permutations you've pulled together! (but thanks 😉 )

    6. andy85wsm
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      That's quite interesting. I'd have thought potentially it would be the other way round with the fact that at GW37 there's only 3 matches left.

      But I guess they're still in quick succession and also perhaps a lot of stuff has already been finalised at that point (relegation, champions, champions league spots etc).

      1. GreenWindmill
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Yep, I think a lot of teams end up blooding youngsters/giving fringe players a run out as they have nothing to play for any more.

    7. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Excellent stuff. Thanks! 🙂

    8. buffrey
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      What someone now needs to do (vote not me) is to work out what this ratio is for teams that are still challenging for something in GW37. (Promotion or relegation) it could be skewed by teams with the league out of sight and or very much trying to stay up, etc.

      This being the season it is it is feasible that 3/4/5/6 teams could still have a realistic chance of the title/survival at GW37 meaning less rotation you would have thought.

      Might look back at doubles with teams when the title was won late in the season

      1. GreenWindmill
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Sure, I should be able to layer that in - I just need to check the GW36 league tables from each season.

      2. andy85wsm
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        This would be super handy. As per my post above I do wonder how much is it is swayed by who has what to play for

      3. GreenWindmill
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Right, I've split the GW36/37 players based on whether their teams had anything to play for at the time (in my view). Screenshot linked below.

        http://i.imgur.com/7TKcIgo.png

        Basic conclusion: where teams have something to play for in the last DGW they rotate at roughly the same levels as the average DGW33/34/35 team. Those with nothing to play for rotate way above average.

        1. BuK II
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Answered this before I could ask it!

          I have been planning to WC 36 and BB 37 and make sure I stack it with players from teams with something to play for, however will see how the weekend pans out and if that needs reassessing.

          Current GW37ers are Man City, Liverpool, Newcastle and Everton. The first three will almost certainly have something to play for in the league and are out of the FA Cup so would feel confident getting 9 solid DGWers from them.

          We'll know by next deadline who the others will be so best make the decision then.

          Could do with these GW34 games getting officially announced too!

          1. BuK II
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 12 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Scrap that - it's actually only Everton and Liverpool confirmed in 37.

            My head hurts!

            1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Confirmed where????

              1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
                • 10 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                Thought not :rolls eyes:

            2. RedLightning
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 15 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Liverpool, Everton, United and West Ham are the four teams who already have two postponed matches, so these four will almost certainly have double game-weeks in both GW34 and GW37.

        2. buffrey
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Cool. Cheers GWM. Good stuff. So still looking like GW34 for BB at present but if t all closes in the gambler could go for GW37 also avoiding those pesky GW35 blanks.

          • 12 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          This is the good stuff, thanks GW

      4. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Big problem here is three of the teams in with a shout of winning the title are unlikely to have dbls, it is also likely that top 4 will be out of reach for the rest by gw37 (maybe one of wham, utd or liv might still be in the hunt) so that leaves relegation teams and this year it seems 2 from three of new, nor and sun will go down with villa so not as many teams involved as usual here either.

        I think you are looking at probably 3 maybe 4 teams with something left to play for which is not a lot when looking at BB and 15 players. Add to this the bigger squads will still rotate in matches they want to win if they are close together (I had Kompany rested one season in a dbl where city were going for the league) and it really adds up to playing wc early imo.

    9. C-Dawgg
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      This is really interseting but I'd be interested to see how much difference there is for 'nailed on' players that we would actually pick. For example I won't pick Spurs wings backs for a DGW as they are very likely to be rotated but Toby or Kane? I suspect they will play all them regardless of the above.

      Other factors would obviously be teams with something still to play vs mid table clubs etc...

      1. GreenWindmill
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        I could conceivably do something based on how much the individual players had been rotated up to that point in the season and whether that correlates to the DGW rotation but that starts to get a bit too much like hard work! I'll save that one for another rainy day I think 🙂

        1. C-Dawgg
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Haha yeah that would be awesome although my comment was just an observation rather than a request 😀

          Still really useful stuff, if nothing else it's convinced me to avoid anyone over the DGW I don't consider 100% nailed on. Otherwise you will suffer the rotations.

    10. GreenWindmill
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Last point on this (I think)

      I've now filtered the data slightly differently to only consider players who achieved at least 1 start in the DGWs. The thinking behind this is that it probably helps to remove some of the more marginal players who only make sub appearances that we're pretty unlikely to be considering in our teams.

      Revised tables in the screenshot here: http://i.imgur.com/xAkIQok.png

      Conclusions are largely the same as before but just for completeness:

      Appearances
      -------------------
      - There's an 85% chance that a player starting at least one game in a DGW33/34/35 FEATURES in both games.
      - That's compared to a 69% chance that a player starting at least one game in a DGW36/37 features in both games.
      - Where the teams still had something to play for in DGW36/37 however, that figure rises to 82% but drops to 56% for the teams just seeing the season out.

      Starts
      ---------
      - There's a 72% chance that a player starting at least one game in a DGW33/34/35 STARTS both games.
      - That's compared to a 54% chance that a player starting at least one game in a DGW36/37 starts in both games.
      - Where the teams still had something to play for in DGW36/37 however, that figure jumps up to 68% but drops to a paltry 40% for the teams just seeing the season out.

      So, DGW34 should see a lot less rotation than DGW37 and could therefore be better for making the most of WC and BB. (Ignoring all other factors that influence that decision) but if you can target those players with something left to play for in DGW37 the levels of rotation should be manageable. Definitely don't rely upon the teams with nothing left to play for to give you DGW options though.

      1. John t penguin
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        hang on but have you taken into account the fact I could make puppies in 2014 but cant now

      2. Twisted Saltergater
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Fantastic stuff, GreenWindmill. I'm very likely to BB in DGW34 and TC in DGW37 off the back of this analysis. 🙂

    11. The Non Flying Dutchman
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Useful info.

      One Caveat to this is the fact that the title race may go right to the wire this season assuming Leicester don't maintain their fantastic form, allowing the chasing pack to catch up.

      1. The Non Flying Dutchman
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        ah I see this has been raised and answered.

        Good stuff.

      2. stufail
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        What? The same form that they've kept up for the last 38 matches, including the end of last season?...

        After a little while it becomes more than just good form.

    12. Neville's Advocate
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Great research, but this doesn't account for which players will be rested. I'm willing to bet more of the 'good' players who we would want to own suffer from less rotation than so called 'less good' players. Interesting to hear others thoughts!

      1. RedLightning
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        This may also have been true with the expected and actual rotations over the hectic Christmas period.

        What are the chances of injuries to key players at this stage of the season? Would they be more or less likely to get injured than earlier on? Might they be more likely to play and risk aggravating minor injuries, since there are so few matches left, if their teams still have something to play for?

        Also, what about the effect of players not wanting to risk injury for fear of missing a World Cup or the Euros?

      2. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        The big teams have big squads so rotation seems to happen even more at the end of the season. I've had the likes of Kompany and Spurs defenders rotated over dbls in the past. The big thing for the bench boost is you need some budget players in there to get to 15 and these are the ones most likely to get rotated.

    13. Ginkapo FPL
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Anybody going to mention the sample size? Cheers GW, but I wont take these to heart.

      1. GreenWindmill
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Yeah, the sample size isn't enormous but reliable enough for me to be satisfied there's a pattern. It considers over 1,000 player appearances and the difference between the GW33/34/35 and GW36/37 results is marked.

        Ideally I would be more rigorous but I'd have to find a fresh data source to go back further and frankly I should be doing real work 🙂

        1. Dino
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Cracking effort which reaffirms my experiences of gw37 dbl gws. I'm almost 99% playing wc for gw33.

          Gw33 wc allows two ft's carried over to 35 so I don't think it will be overly difficult to get 11 out in 35. I think there is a high chance Everton will have a game in 35 leaving me with 5 players (probably 3 liv 2 eve) with a dbl in 37 and a fixt in 35 added to 4 players with no fixt in 35 but a dbl in 34 and 37 which is 9 players with dbls in 37 and 4 ft's (admittedly sunderland players may be the only ones you could bring in that have a fixt in 35 AND dbl in 37 so not too much flexibility).

    14. Nickofoz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Brilliant stuff GW, thanks a lot!

    15. Charlie Adam in a Tutu
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      This does point to a GW34 BB. However, this means that you have to WC in GW33, and lose your players who don't have a DGW. For me this would mean losing loads of value on Mahrez, potentially limiting my options for the WC team. Whereas TC in GW34 allows retention of three (plus goalie) non DGW players where you have value stored.

      1. niloh1
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        yeah i'm on the same boat as you. I think some spurs/ Leciester players are worth keeping, but i dno.. i always wanted to TC aguero on a DGW.. but it seems using the BB on GW34 is a better/safer option.

    16. Porkchops Johnson
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Quality post and good research, but:

      Not sure if it's been mentioned since it's a ton of comments, but some things to consider:
      1) We usually go for players that are nailed on, which should have a better chance of starting both games, no matter when the DGW is. As an example the players that usually get rotated are the more risky players players, the likes of Walcott, Oscar, Giroud, while we usually have the likes of Ozil, Hazard. Consider that players we'd never have also affect these numbers.

      1 1/2) The numbers are also affected by players that don't really compete for a start, but are likely to get subbed on atleast once in the span of two games. Players of the same type like for example Iheanacho, RLC, Perreira, etc.

      2) With the title race and competition for top 4, most teams will likely have something to play for until the very last GW, thus somewhat reducing the effect of this.

      That being said, it slightly suggests a BB for DGW34.

      1. GreenWindmill
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Hi Sunden, thanks for the comments.

        Point 1 is a good one and I haven't got anything to counter that within the stats. As I mentioned in one of my comments above I could conceivably try to factor season long rotation for every player in my sample but that's a job for another day. Basically, a well-informed fantasy manager might very well be able to tiptoe through the rotation minefield in any DGW (although it would be easier in DGW34)

        Points 1.5 and 2 I think are covered by my secondary analysis here: http://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/comment/12857864. In hindsight I'd have led with this but it was only when other posters started throwing ideas into the mix that I went this route 🙂

        1. Porkchops Johnson
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          I guess it's next to impossible to better the analysis with regards to Point 1, but I felt like it needed to be mentioned.

          Didn't notice the second analysis as this hot topic has really many comments, but yeah those numbers were more like expected. Seems like GW34 is still clearly favoured, would've thought the difference between 34 and 37 was gonna be smaller.

          Really nice work, hope the fixtures are scheduled in a way that gives a good 3C option in 37.

      2. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Point 1 doesn't hold up in actual fact though as I have had big players "rested" during dbls and this is even more pronounced for the big teams with big squads.

        Point 2 Lei and Spurs don't have a dbl and city are unlikely to in 37 either which leaves only arsenal possibly going for the title of the top teams. I'd be pretty sure the 4 spot will be done and dusted by gw 37 with possibly united/liverpool still going for it but it is not hard to get these players in if required. So the only teams likely having something to play for are Arsenal (improbable imo), United and Liverpool (possible but unlikely), the relegation teams sunderland (possibly) and norwich (possibly) but the gap between the bottom 4 and the ones above means not many more teams are likely to get drawn into it.

        1. Porkchops Johnson
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Point 1 also depends on whether a team has something to play for or not (or if they have something to rest their players for). Can't see for example Ozil, Sanchez, Kosc get rested if Arsenal are still competing for the title. There are exceptions of course, but "nailed" players should be less likely to get rested.

          I prefer 34 for BB, just pointing out factors that might reduce chances of rotation.

          There's still the Europa League spots to play for, although probably not as big of a source for motivation as getting top 4 or keeping the PL spot.

          It was my understanding that the City DGW could come at any time, but I've mostly been busy this week, so I'm not 100% updated on the latest.

          1. Dino
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 16 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Technically the city dbl can be in any gw but realistically it will slot into one of the gws free for a dbl i.e. gw34 or gw37 and in the past iirc they always seem to reschedule a game for the first available opportunity so that would be 34 for city.

            1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              City still in the CL and GW37 would suit them much better because of this.

              1. Dino
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 16 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                I don't think city will have much of a say in it tbh, the premier league will likely schedule it for as soon as possible in case another fixture needs to be arranged for the gw37 blank.

                We can agree to differ on it but I called the early dbl you were talking about and I'd be pretty confident I'm right about this one too.

                1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
                  • 10 Years
                  9 years, 9 months ago

                  Of course Man C will have a say - clubs hold the sway, and there will be no other Man C or Newcastle PL games to re-arrange. Not sure what you are going on about in your last paragraph, but I'm pretty confident you are going to be wrong this time, but we'll see I guess 🙂

                  1. Dino
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 16 Years
                    9 years, 9 months ago

                    The games are rescheduled by the PL (and TV companies) not the clubs, the clubs are involved in discussions of course but they don't have the final say afaik.

                    With regard to other re-scheduled games anything could happen between now and gw37, terrorist attack, snow cancellation, transport striker etc etc so the PL will try and keep the last available spot free if possible imo.

                    Lastly was it not you who had a post about a potential dbl gw around gw25 or something? I seem to recall debating it at the time saying I thought it was extremely unlikely but you were pretty adamant that it was more than likely. I could have you mixed up with someone else though and if so apologies.

                    1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
                      • 10 Years
                      9 years, 9 months ago

                      Nope - I always said DGW25 was unlikely (though possible).

                      Actually, speaking of DGW25, if the PL like to arrange the games for as soon as possible, why didn't they arrange Newcastle v Man City for GW25? The answer is because of Man City's schedule at the time, and the proximity to a CL match - sounds familiar....... 😉

                      1. Dino
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 16 Years
                        9 years, 9 months ago

                        Apologies I have you confused with someone else re dbl gw 25.

                        Dbl gw25 was a different scenario as it was too close to try and rearrange from a TV point of view. It is not like Arsenals fa cup game this weekend as the fa cup doesn't have the same TV pull or the same travel logistics for fans etc either. I don't think it had much to do with Man City schedule.

                      2. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
                        • 10 Years
                        9 years, 9 months ago

                        Ok, so.........

                        Pellegrini hit's the roof around Man C's schedule in February before CL match

                        Pellegrini hit's the roof about date of Chelsea FA Cup match being on the Sunday 3 days before they play CL match

                        PL have a straight choice with no other issues (and the suggestion that there might be snow or a terrorist attack is a consideration is ridiculous btw) of whether to play Newcastle game in GW34, where Pellegrini will hit the roof due to the schedule before a CL match, or GW37 where there would be no CL issues.

                        Still "pretty confident" around GW34?

    17. A.T
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Great research GW. Thanks.

    18. McQueen
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Thanks Greenwindmill!!! Very helpful.

  12. Nolberto Solano
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Butland

    Toby Kompany VVD Fuchs

    Mahrez Arnie Alli

    Aguero(c) Kane Vardy

    *Robles Smith *Ozil *Payet

    2FT. What to do?

    1. The Wise Owl
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Butland -> Fabianksi?

    2. Elly88 > KTR (Kevin The …
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Payet to Silva/Yaya if you have the funds. Will play in 30, and DGW 34.

  13. blakewardle
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Anyone else on Alli captain?

    1. Epic Fail
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I've seen some.

    2. GreenWindmill
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Too risky for my blood given the other options available - I'm definitely going for one of Aguero/Kane/Vardy.

  14. TheTinman
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Be a few happy people on here with that Arsenal result last night

    1. Slartibartfast
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Yup, 2nd in my ML now down to 8 players for GW30... including Danny Drinkwater. I like my chances of pulling further ahead.

  15. Batigol
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    A little help to sort out my defence please
    Im rolling out a 3-4-3 so i cant decide who to go with please help me drop one to the bench
    Huth-Daniels-Kompany-Alderweireld
    who would you bench?

    1. Epic Fail
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Alderweireld.

      Villa will score. Granted it will be 1-7, but they will score.

      1. Mark-O
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        I sense a non Spurs def owner here

        1. Epic Fail
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Worse. I'm a Villa supporter.

          1. Mark-O
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Ouch

      2. Morgs
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Alder has that goal/assist threat though, one of those players I'd never bench (weekend just gone a case in point)

    2. The Wise Owl
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I'd bench Huth, whilst Newcastle aren't winning they do carry a threat.

      1. Batigol
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Thanks guys.Tough one to choose. Im thinking its going to be between Huth and Alder. Leaning more to Huth. Unless someone can change my mind

        1. Space Cadete
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          I actually think Norwich fighting for their lives at home against City are more likely to score than the other teams.

          Bench Kompany

  16. Piggs Boson
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    What did Villa do with all that Benteke money?

    That was probably the worst transfer of the season, for both partys.

    1. Mark-O
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Gestede

    2. The Wise Owl
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Went back into the shareholders pockets.

      1. Slartibartfast
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Nah, they spent loads this summer. None of the signings have really stepped up, though.

        1. oghash
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Richards I like. But no good having only 1 defender that can play

    3. Epic Fail
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Bought a load of shiite.

    4. Hy liverpool
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Amavi Richards Gestede guye vertout Lescott Ayew
      who the hell are those ??

      1. Hooky
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Decent Championship players. Good forward planning by the board in my opinion 😉

        1. Hy liverpool
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          😀
          feel sorry for their fans (Epic fail)

          1. Epic Fail
            • 15 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            It's so ridiculous, I just find it funny now. 😀

        1. Hy liverpool
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          😀

      2. Epic Fail
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        The best player didn't even get the minutes. Adama is a brilliant player. Finally got a few minutes and then got injured.

        1. oghash
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Was that the barca player? Loan or permanent buy?

          1. Epic Fail
            • 15 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Aye that's the one. Cost £7m or something. Problem is he has a shed load of expensive add ons that come in to effect if he plays a lot.

            But if they didn't want to pay them, then what was the point in buying him, Makes no sense.

            He's by far the best player Villa have though.

            1. oghash
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Yeah he looked good. Had a soft spot for villa since dalian Atkinson, Tony McGrath and the winger with the hair, Tony Daley? Hope you get back up soon, unless palace go down too, then I hope we go up first 🙂

              1. oghash
                • 10 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                Paul McGrath? Great defender, glass knees, booze hound

        2. Hy liverpool
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Indeed.. isn't he on loan ?

        3. Piggs Boson
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          He looked fantastic. Shame...

    5. Kings of Lyon ★
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Agreed. He would have kept them up

      1. Batigol
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Yeah true. They havent got much to show for it

  17. CCaddy
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Who do you think is the safest man city defensive option?

    1. Epic Fail
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      K

    2. n-doggg
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Obvs Kompany

    3. Mark-O
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      K or H

    4. The Wise Owl
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      It's between Kompany or Otamendi, but Kompany is 100% safe.

    5. Piggs Boson
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      1. Joe Hart
      2. Otamendi
      3. Kompany (injury risk?)

  18. dennis the menace
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    hi all, i have 11 playing but that includes Cedric. Do i risk playing him or trade? and to who?

    Butland
    Simpson Kompany Daniels Cedric
    Mahrez Alli Arnie
    Vardy Kane Kun

    (Elliot, Azpi, Ozil, Sanchez) 1FT, 0.9 ITb

    1. The Wise Owl
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Cedric to Williams?

    2. Hy liverpool
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Williams

  19. Mark-O
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    You know FFS is mad when they put the following:

    Rise: Ighalo, Giroud
    Fall: Payet, Antonio

    1. The Wise Owl
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Where?

      1. Mark-O
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        On the right side of the main page

    2. Individual
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I love that Bellerin rose last night

    3. Hooky
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Watchlist obviously takes into account the blanks. .

      1. Mark-O
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Explain Giroud.

        1. Hooky
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Has it been updated properly after last nights match yet?

  20. Individual
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Who should I bring in to start instead of Saylor?

    a) Williams (4-3-3)
    b) Otamendi (4-3-3, have Kompany too - City treble up!
    c) Yaya (3-4-3, City treble up!)
    d) Alli (3-4-3, spuds treble up!)
    e) Ritchie - fire and forget 5th mid
    f) Gradel - differential gamble for the week!

    Have 1ft and 4.8 itb!

    Thinking mostly about c and d really, but would be good to know what people think!

    1. The Wise Owl
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      C

      1. Individual
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Thanks Wise Owl 🙂

        1. The Wise Owl
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Feel free to comment on my earlier post.

          1. Individual
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 12 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Sorry man, got distracted (stupid work) - have done now!

  21. mad_beer ✅
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Repost as I posted on an old article.

    Butland, (Myhill*)
    Toby, VvD, Simpson, Francis (Monreal*)
    Mahrez, Silva, Siggy, Gosling (Payet*)
    Kane, Kun, Vardy

    1FT and 1.1 ITB

    Should I:

    A. Save FT and play Gosling or Francis
    B. Payet to Eriksen
    C. Payet to Alli (I'm leaning towards this one)

    Thanks all

    1. The Wise Owl
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I'm with you on C.

      1. mad_beer ✅
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Thanks dude.

    2. Mini Mane Mo
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      C as well since Alli is banned from Europa League

      1. mad_beer ✅
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Thanks

    3. Individual
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Think most people are looking at a similar kind of thing!

      I'd probably say C as Alli has decent form away from home and also isn't playing vs. Dortmund!

  22. jeppee
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Capital letters blank

    Forster (HENNESSEY)
    Kompany, Fuchs, Targett (AZPI, CRESSWELL)
    Eriksen, Siggy, Mahrez, Alli (ÖZIL)
    Vardy, Aguero (LUKAKU)

    1FT 0,9 ITB.

    As I see it i have 3 options.

    A: Cresswell - Williams & pray for Targett start
    B: Cresswell & Lukaku - Williams & Kane (-4)
    C: Cresswell Targett - VVD & Wolly (-4)

    A Might leave me w 10 players
    B is not benefitial looking at DGW
    C Prob not worth a hit considering Targett might play?

    1. The Wise Owl
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      A - Targett could start, unless Yoshida or Cedric starts.
      B - Good for potential points, you can fix it with a WC.
      C - You're right.

      1. jeppee
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Cheers m8

  23. Ten Season Wonder
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    I have 5 playing defenders this week. I am playing 4-4-2.
    Can you guys help me bench one;

    VVD (sto)
    Wollscheid (SOU)
    Dier (avl)
    Daniels (SWA)
    Simpson (NEW)

    1. The Wise Owl
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Simpson.

      1. Ten Season Wonder
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Wise Owl, you on a wind up?

        1. The Wise Owl
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          No, Newcastle are trying to stay out of the drop zone.

          Second thought would be to bench Wollscheid.

          1. Ten Season Wonder
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            If you had 5 playing defenders, would you bench Fuchs?

            1. The Wise Owl
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Depends on the opposition.

    2. Japan Boy
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Dier or VVD

    3. Mark-O
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      V for you, Kris. 🙂

  24. Elly88 > KTR (Kevin The …
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Which DGW 34 teams will certainly have a GW 35 fixture?

    1. kijsberg
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Very interested in knowing this as well. I know Liverpool will, but I don't know of any others.

    2. Ten Season Wonder
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Me too.

    3. A Defender's Nightmare
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Good question.

      Atm. I think only MUN & WHM have blank GW 35 confirmed.

      1. Mini Mane Mo
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Either Everton or Chelsea and Ars or Watford will as well depending who wins their FA Cup tie

        1. Elly88 > KTR (Kevin The …
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          I Arsenal win, will they have a fixture in gw 35?

    4. Piggs Boson
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Liverpool, City and Newcastle.

      1. Piggs Boson
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        And the Baggies.

      2. Elly88 > KTR (Kevin The …
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Cheers I guese I will start loading up with city and pool now that I already have 11 for gw 30.

        1. Piggs Boson
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Bear in mind that the doubles aren't confirmed yet. For all we know, City's could be in 37.

      3. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Has NEW v MNC been confirmed for GW34?

        1. Lateriser 12
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Not yet.

        2. Piggs Boson
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Nope. No double fixtures have. We'll get some tomorrow apparently.

          1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Ok - so not certainly like the question asked then 😛

            GW37 more likely anyway, IMO. Fits in much better with Man C's CL schedule.

        3. Pasqualinho
          • 16 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Not yet - but lots of premature confirmation from posters on here.

  25. bring back diop
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Sch - (Hen*)
    VVD - Dier - Smith - Targett* - (Monreal)
    Mahrez - Surman - Ozil* - (Sanchez*) - (Payet*)
    Aguero - Vardy - Kane

    1.1 itb 2FT
    Pick 2
    A) Monreal--> Kompany
    B) Sanchez/Ozil --> Yaya/Siggy
    C) Targett --> Wollscheid

    1. Individual
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      You need to sort out your midfield for this gameweek I think dude - your defence will hold out!

      I'd say Sanch out for Yaya and perhaps Surman out for a better mid from the remaining teams (Alli perhaps?) to give you a strong XI.

  26. mourinho_el_fenómeno
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    butland
    williams vvd toby fuchs oxford
    ozil alexis barkley siggy alli
    kane vardy naismith

    NO FT NO WC.

    bank 4.5M

    best tactic from now on ? :/ help plz.

    1. bitm2007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      You need city players to set you up from the GW34 DGW and the GW35 multi blank week.

      I can't see a way of getting Kun and 11 players this GW without taking three hits, so

      Oxford and Alexis to Kompany and Yaya

      1. bitm2007
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        or Alexis and Naismith to Kun and Mahrez (get two more city players in before GW34)

      2. mourinho_el_fenómeno
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        gw35 multi blank ?! meaning ?

  27. Gizzachance
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    bench boost option: 15 dgw players, or maybe less with some single gw players in for blanks good fixtures etc like lei or tot players ?peoples thoughts

    1. Epic Fail
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      All depends on the fixtures when they are confirmed really.

      1. Gizzachance
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        yeah and potential blanks, cheers

      2. Ten Season Wonder
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Any idea when this will be Epic?

  28. Ten Season Wonder
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Any idea when WHU and their DGWs are pencilled in for?

    1. Mini Mane Mo
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Week 34 and 37

  29. dejarik
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Are any of these players not nailed on for the weekend? I have exactly 11 players who are playing, wondering if I need to make any transfers.

    Forster
    Dier - Wollscheid - Kompany - Simpson
    Arnautovic - Alli - Mahrez
    Kane - Vardy - Aguero

    Bench: DDG - Dann, Payet, Özil

    1 FT

    1. Mini Mane Mo
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      wld be tempted to take ozil out (impending drop in price) and bring in either siggy or silva for a couple of weeks.

      1. Individual
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Agree - Siggy has AVL next weekend, too.

  30. Aftermath
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Got 1ft and 2itb.
    Worth transferring out targett or hope he starts?
    If transfer,then to whom?
    Rest of the defense is Toby/Daniels/Fuchs/monreal*
    Would be able to field 11 only if target starts.
    Planning on WC in GW33..
    Any help appreciated..

    1. Mini Mane Mo
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      how about Williams (SWA)