Community Submissions

Is Hazard Really A Slow Starter?

More than half the Fantasy Premier League teams going into 2015/16 have one thing in common: the presence of a flat-track Belgian Bully by the name of Eden Hazard. The managers who have him will even go on record saying things like Hazard is borderline essential, and with his improvement and sheer dominance in Fantasy games last season, that is hard to argue with.

While most can agree that Eden Hazard is the best midfielder to own in Fantasy games, many others are arguing that due to his lofty price he can be ignored and drafted in later on in the season. Cesc Fabregas, who is 2.5 cheaper and finished last season amongst the top five midfielders, for example,  is putting forward a solid case as an able replacement.  In addition, the Spain international is traditionally a fast starter to the season in racking up points. In contrast, Hazard is perceived as a slow starter. But is that the case? This article aims to look in detail at Hazard’s track record to see if he really can be safely ignored at the start of the season. For each of his last five seasons I’ll give a ‘hare’ or ‘tortoise’ verdict to show whether he had a slow or great start.

2010/11 (Lille, Ligue 1)

Hazard did not deliver attacking returns until the fourth game of what was his first season as a regular starter for Lille. He then proceeded to go nearly a month and a half until his next attacking return. But after the goal that broke his dry spell on November 7, Hazard went on for a nice burst of form for the French side and re-won back the favour of boss Rudi Garcia in his selections (Hazard had briefly been dropped due to his poor performances). Hazard’s form at the start was undeniably disappointing, to the point that his manager was even forced to agree.

Here are some probable factors: He was just 19 years old and there certainly must have been pressure knowing he was expected to perform at a top club in a top league in just his first full season as a starter. In addition, Hazard had been publicly criticized by the Belgian national team manager who talked about him as lazy in training. This must have had an effect on his confidence.

Verdict: Tortoise

2011/12 (Lille, Ligue 1)

Like the year before, Hazard once again started off with just one attacking return in his first four games (this time it was an assist rather than a goal). However, those four games were different from last year. In the year prior, Hazard mustered just two shots in total over the first four matches; but in the 2011/12 season Hazard took three, five and six shots in his first three games. His shots were also getting more accurate and he was clearly getting better as a player; in the next six Ligue 1 matches he notched four goals and six assists. It’s safe to say the Belgian began the season on fire and would’ve delighted Fantasy owners.

Verdict: Hare

2012/13 (Chelsea, Premier League)

Hazard began his first season in the Premier League on fire first with assists, then goals. His debut saw 63 minutes of play and an assist earned, his next two games brought two more assists with five shots taken by him. Gameweeks 3 and 7 also saw him add goals to his fine start, the first of which was a penalty.

Verdict: Hare

2013/14 (Chelsea, Premier League)

Hazard started poorly, failing to register an attacking return in the first six Premier League matches. It wasn’t until Gamweek 7 when his breakthrough came. In this match he scored two goals and an assist to delight those patient Fantasy managers who had stuck with him through this barren spell.

Verdict: Tortoise

2014/15 (Chelsea, Premier League)

When people say Hazard is a slow starter, most tend to reference last season where many remember him not immediately dominating games as owners of Diego Costa and Fabregas picked up the points. Hazard meanwhile could only muster one goal in Gameweek 2 during the early part of the season. He also failed to register significant returns during Chelsea’s stellar scoring matches against Swansea (3-6) and Everton (4-2). But are we being unfair on him? He did fire off five shots at the Swansea goal, the same as Costa, who scored a hat-trick.

But it wasn’t until the chill of winter when he scored three goals in three separate games that Hazard emerged as premium midfielder in Fantasy games. Hazard’s early start was poor in terms of Fantasy terms, but given his attacking threat perhaps he was unlucky.

Verdict: Tortoise

Conclusion

Eden Hazard seems to have a reputation of starting slow but this analysis shows a more complex picture. While he did indeed start poorly in three of the last five seasons in England and France, the two great starts he enjoyed will give his many owners hope.

All in all, going without the league’s best midfielder can still be justified if you think the rest of your team looks THAT much better without the Belgian, but you’ve been warned, you can’t count on a slow start from the 11.5-priced man.

Nice to Finally Michu FPL: Inaugural "Last Man Standing" Winner - top 5k, 7k finisher - Fantasy Bundesliga: 75th (19/20), 86th (20/21)

58 Comments Post a Comment
  1. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    Mixed picture regarding his slow starts. Seems fixtures don't play a part either in his starts, as last year Chelsea had a great early run.

    1. sboj
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      That's very true Jonty. Hazard last season seemed to be fixture resilient even during the 'bus parking' part of the season as he seemed to score that 5point goal, grab 3point bonus and a clean sheet for a good performance.

      However, I am one of those who have vehemently been raising this red flag about Hazard's early season forms. I owned him from the start last season and he cost me. I was analysing him to bits and he seemed underused, played very 'defensively' and sometimes even as a decor. I'm using this term from NFL, where superstars are often started even with injuries or out of form just to drag attention their way. I can see Mou doing it with him and I saw that on Hazard last year. Hazard was after a long and successful WC campaign with Belgium and probably rusty. He only turned his season when Costa's incredible form dropped off and started outscoring Fabregas.

      I agree with the article that I would not apriori jump to conclusions about his early forms. In this case I would look at his preseason form. The super goal against Barca in my opinion was partially a fluke and to great extent a terriblad defender by a third string centre back. If you look closely enough on the play, Hazard won't see that kind of defending again this season. Other than that, he didn't seem sharp. Mourinho even after the Community Shield match admitted that after the title hangover they had a longer offseason, so I would not be surprised if he was off for first few weeks.

      Then with him being priced at 11.5 and owned by half the teams there is a great danger his price can drop drastically, while Fabregas can go up quickly making it a very bad transfer financially very quickly.

      Having said all that, he is more than capable slipping one or two in against Swansea and City and it will be all a no deal.

      1. Elvy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        8 years, 8 months ago

        I owned Hazard from the start last season too; our analyses of his early season differ. I saw him tearing defences to shreds, but repeatedly assisting the assister. Check out Loïc Rémy's goal against Swansea in Chelsea's fourth game of the 2014/15 season. Hazard is at his very best, dismantling the defence before passing to Oscar who squares to Rémy who scores. I didn't see Hazard starting the season slowly, I saw him playing magnificent attacking football. It didn't bring in the FPL points, but that can happen at any time. I can't see it as a reliable indicator he will be a slow FPL starter this year.

    2. eppaligy
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      For me, the trouble with this gamble is not whether it's a slow start, it's HOW you make your team "2.5m better" without him. Depending on your approach you could hurt yourself later. If you spend your 2.5 mil on one or two other expensive upgrades, it makes trading down to get him later pretty straight forward. But if you put .5 and 1m here and there all over the park, it makes finding the cash later hard. And if you wind up having to use a wildcard 'just for him' OR do more than 2 transfers and take the points hit, you might lose any value you found anyway.

      Which is why I'm starting with him. I think it's the safest bet. You don't want to be the turkey standing on the platform when the Hazard express leaves with 53% of the other players on it!! That would be worst-case. (because that's also what insulates you from the downside - if he tanks, he's taking half the comp with him anyway!!)

      Maybe I'm too conservative.

  2. Doolittle
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    Thanks, good work. It would be great to have an accompanying piece on Fabregas, as I would guess that many people's decisions on Hazard includes having/not having Fabregas.

  3. Bumblebee
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    Iv gone with fab over Haz for the start with the thinking that fab tends to start fast and Haz starts slow so for the first few weeks fab should at least = Haz points and the extra 2.5 can help gain me the extra points then I can WC once I know who the better budget options are and have seen how the likes of depay, Milner, sterling, benteke do and if Kane is anything like last year.

  4. Ryssel
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    Could Hazard's price take a bit of a drop after GW3?

    He is owned by 57% of the people, a lot of them newbies I that might panic sell quickly if things don't start of well and I assume some people might move him on to accommodate Augero or even use him as a place holder for Sanchez for the time being.

    What do you think?

    (I posted this in the Burning Questions article earlier, but this seems a more appropriate place. Apologies for the double post)

    1. Jonny JAB
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      Well thats my plan, Hazard > 9.0m Rooney > Aguero come GW4 and I can see a lot of people doing the same! Also a lot of people seem to be early wildcarding, I didn't think transfers under wildcard affected prices but I could be very wrong!

  5. Fiona B
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    Doing a double up on Haz and Fab. If Haz starts slow I am hoping Fab starts well.

    1. Fiona B
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      Plus if you don't start with him, trying to work in Haz and Aguero after GW1 will be a pain

  6. Every Dog Has Its Day
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    I have no idea what to say; I'll stick with him but you do have some interesting findings.

  7. Chicharito7
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    My current dilemma is :
    Fabregas & Rooney / Hazard & Lukaku / drop Ivanovic for a 4.5 defender and have both Rooney & Hazard ?

    1. Kolarov Fpl Legend
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      Do not drop Ivan! I said do not drop Ivan!

  8. moo
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    I have no Haz or Fab, is this suicidal? 🙂

    Currently:

    Guzan / Ruddy
    Mertesacker / Ivanovic / Jenkinson / Huth / Coates
    Mane / Depay / Lens / Walcott / Sterling
    Lukaku / Rooney / Ighalo

    Playing 3-5-2 and willing to wildcard early if things don't work out, and planning on getting Aguero in for week 4.

  9. Boothy
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    Get Rekt 😉

    Hennessey

    Ivan - Kosc - Cedric - Huth - Gomez 😉

    Haz - Ozil

    Rooney - Costa - Kane

    McCarthy - Coates - Sinclair - Mutch

    1. Hic Sunt Leones
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      try again

    2. Kolarov Fpl Legend
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      Yea hmm,try again

  10. RSe
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    re people worried about Haz price drop, are you not intending to keep anyway, so it shouldn't really matter too much?

  11. gazwoz13
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    Ready for a strategical question? If I'm looking for a 4.0 GK to go with my certain starter GK am I better going one with high or low ownership if I don't want them to drop in value over the course of the season?

    1. Now I'm Panicking
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      Does it matter if your starter is always going to start?

      1. gazwoz13
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 8 months ago

        Yep - don't want the backup guy to drop in value and reduce transfer funds..

  12. gazwoz13
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    Yep - don't want the backup guy to drop in value and reduce transfer funds...

    1. gazwoz13
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      Whoops..

  13. OShaughnessy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    Going back to Hazard's days in France is a nice touch there, well done.

    Although, my having or not having Hazard to start the year doesn't have anything to do with the Tortoise & the Hare approach.

    Its more Hazard's fixtures & the captaincy.

    Fixtures - In his FPL career, Hazard has registered almost 70% of his goals at the Bridge.
    In the first three weeks he plays away to City & again away to WBA.
    Now, this isn't to say he won't score but, the odds certainly don't favour it.

    Captaincy - £11.5mil is a pretty hefty price for a player who we won't be captaining in the first 3 x GWs. Perhaps we may consider it in GW4 when Chelsea host CPL?
    Well, if Aguero's fit for City's home clash with Watford it'll be a stretch to give the Belgian the armband their too.

    In the end, even if Hazard was a fast starter, I think we could safely avoid him for the first three weeks anyway & after that... Well, that's already a month into the New Year & who knows what'll be happening by then!

    1. RedLightning
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      "We won't be captaining him for the first 3 x GWs." 😯

      But he's top of the captain poll for GW1!

      1. OShaughnessy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 8 months ago

        OK, but we've got equally as good options w/ Ars, Utd, & perhaps Eve for some.

        And, one week isn't enough to draw me in with the next two away games most likely being low scoring affairs.

        And, following the captain's poll here should have little, if any influence on our choices each week.

        1. RedLightning
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 13 Years
          8 years, 8 months ago

          Yes, there are alternatives. But if he was in your squad then surely he would be a strong contender for GW1 captain.

          I agree that he may not be essential (if anyone is) till about GW13, but very few other players are likely to outscore him even before then.

          1. OShaughnessy
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            8 years, 8 months ago

            It's hard for a doubt digit priced player to really get a great PPM return, unless we can captain them.

            And, as you've pointed out (& so long as Aguero's healthy) there just aren't too many opportunities where I can see Hazard getting the armband.

            For the past 3 seasons, I've always had him GW1 (Che DGW's helped) but, this year w/ how the sched worked out I think I can go without for a little while.

    2. kae0r
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      GW1 at home to Swansea - seems like a captain choice to me!

      1. OShaughnessy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 8 months ago

        Ars home to Whm & Utd home to Tot also seem like decent shouts as well.

        The nice thing with each of those teams is their following fixtures are also very good as well & we can probably continue to use those players as captain's choices again.

        With Che, not so much...

        1. Give us a smile
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 8 months ago

          Do you have Hazard in your team at the min mate?

          I've had him in since my first draft until about 3 hours ago I swapped Azpi & Haz > Ivan & Fab +£1.5M - can't decide whether to stick with that decision though.

          1. OShaughnessy
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            8 years, 8 months ago

            No Hazard right now.
            Probably looking to find room for him GW4 or so?
            But, that's a lifetime away FPL wise.

  14. Hitthelow
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    RMT

    Ruddy/Rudd

    Az/Clyne/Cedric

    Hazard/Henderson/Depay/Walcott

    Rooney/Deeney/Pelle

    Bench: Wanyama/Huth/Steven Taylor

    Got 2m left for Aguero 🙂

  15. george jp
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    PLZ I NEED HELP ASAP
    my team sucks, need advice for replacements

    Schmeichel
    Schwarzer

    Azpilicueta,Cédric, Mertesacker,Bassong,Francis

    Willian,Cazorla,Fàbregas,Sterling,Depay

    Benteke,Jerome,Rooney

    1. BlzE_94
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      get rid of willian and jerome

  16. Uppy
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    I'm playing 3-5-2 and I am torn between Schneiderlin and Claise from Southampton as my 5th midfielder. I think Schneiderlin is the better player but with Carrick, Schweinsteiger, Fellaini, Blind, Herrera and Mata who can also play in the midfield 3 that LVG seems to play, he may not play all the time.

    Claise is his obvious replacement at Saints and was described as the Dutch Xavi and is likely to play each week.

    Both £5.5m but who is likely to pick up more points bearing in mind talent and playing time?

  17. DaisyDaisyDaisyDaisy
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    I think the question is also what you do with that extra cash. I'm quite happy with people like Sakho and Milner in my draft team - no great desire to upgrade them. And if I use the money in defence it means transfers to get it back out again.

    Haz is on pens and without Costa I think he has to get involved up top as much as possible. I also think Chelsea are more likely to attack early doors as I well recall Ivan playing so far up until later in the season when they started to grind it out. Plus a captaincy option regardless of opposition. I'll likely captain him as will many more - don't want to risk a poor start and playing catchup...

  18. Bluesers
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    Ive jumped on the Hazard band wagon but am unsure.... Heres my team:

    Schmeichel - Schwarzer (not hoping for much here)
    Fonte - Azpilicueta - Bellerin (Baker - Francis)
    Hazard - Özil - Sterling - Mané (Wanyama)
    Wilson - Rooney - Benteke.

    Might swap Özil for Walcott, although Walcott not definite starter...? Thoughts please...

    1. The_Kane_Train
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      lol my team is

      Schmeichel
      ----------------------
      Ivan Kosc Huth (Francis, Oshea)
      ------------------
      Fab Ozil Sterling Mane (Wanyama)
      ------------------------
      Wilson Rooney Benteke

      Not Walcott, I think there's justification for Cazorla though. And I've been chopping between Ozil and Caz for days.

  19. andyblack16
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    Hazard's high ownership percentage means you can't really go without; especially if he bags a hat-trick in a captainable gameweek. Plus, Diego 'paper hamstring' Costa will probably be injured for 1/3 of the season - even more reason to go with Hazard. Although I honestly believe he won't get the points that his price assumes.

    Here's my team, tell me what you think!
    (Wildcard planned for GW4 so only worried about the starting 11 until then)

    Schmeichel - Schwarzer
    Ivanovic - Merts - O'Shea (Baker - Taylor)
    Hazard - Özil - Sterling - Ritchie (Wanyama)
    Rooney - Benteke - Pelle.

    I was torn between Mane/Wilson or Ritchie/Pelle, but went with the latter.
    Thoughts?

    1. Root
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      "Hazard's high ownership percentage means you can't really go without;"

      No.

      1. andyblack16
        • 8 Years
        8 years, 8 months ago

        Care to elaborate? Has he made your team?

        1. Pinturicchio
          • 11 Years
          8 years, 8 months ago

          He's in my team and his ownership percentage has nothing to do with it.

          I don't think I've ever used someone's ownership potential as a relevant piece of information for anything.

    2. kae0r
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      I'd say its a good team.

      Personally I wouldnt risk having two new players in tekkers and sterling before they have time to gel, however they're of course both quality players.

      Despite being captain, not sure if O'Shea still 100% nailed.

  20. KRANOKM
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    Excellent article - some pointers from my newbie point of vision :
    - Last season Hazard had a World Cup where his form was really poor and this took some time to wear off in the EPL, I myself got Haz at a lower price than he initially started
    - Mou is keen on getting Hazard onto the FIFA Golden Ball shortlist and this means he will be made into more and more of a protagonist
    - Costa is not 100%, Remy & Falcao looked really shaky in the game against Arsenal, making Hazard much more of an attacking midfield (more C. Ronaldo types)
    - Here's hoping to a major HARE season

  21. Woy of the Wovers
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    I was hoping for more figures in this article. It feels more anecdotal rather than evidence-based so it's not clear if there's any confirmation bias in the conclusions.

  22. tm245
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    Thanks for the deeper look than just last year, very helpful.

    On another note, I was looking at his stats last year and it doesn't seem that he ever scored a brace in the 2014/15 campaign. I don't want to invoke the wrath of the FPL gods here and I fondly remember captaining for his hat trick in the previous season, but he is a curious case FPL points wise:

    -- 42 bonus points last year, just a massive number, way ahead of the pack. One of this summer's best articles on baps redistribution showed that this will suffer a bit, but I'm not sure it is too much.
    -- not many monster 15+ hauls, seems to be the king of the match winning goal/assist in a 1-0 victory getting him 9 or 10 or 11 points.

    What I am struck by is not a feeling that you need to hide behind the sofa on any given match day if you don't own Hazard, but that you are really putting a big piece of furniture between yourself and a top ranking if you go without him for too long. That consistency is what kills the nonowner more than any one performance.

    That's why I like the question you raised here, because we need to decide how many of those 10 point Hazard performances we can risk going without. I have been trying to downgrade him to Fabregas for over a week now, and I can't yet seem to do anything that I love with the money as much as I value those king of the baps performances he grinds out.

    Still undecided, but thanks for the article.

  23. kae0r
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    Am I missing something crucial?
    Is 3 SOT too much?
    Thinking due to WAT poor fixtures going Deeney to Defoe? Potential better points return?

    Pant //Krul
    Azpi/Cedric/Koscielny // Huth
    Wally/Ozil/Hazard/Richie// Wanyama
    Deeney/Pelle/Rooney

    GW2 - Wally or Ozil to Chadli or Eriksen
    GW3 - save
    GW4 - Rooney to Aguero plus a spare xfer

    1. kae0r
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      Forgot Williams in defense 😀

  24. kae0r
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    My reasoning for Haz is that it will be easy to downgrade him but very hard to put in him after you've spent the cash elsewhere in your team!

  25. Toast
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    In the Charity shield I thought Fab was very poor, particularly in the first half. He did have a good pass from which Hazard should have scored.

    I would have been interested in his preseason numbers to see if there is any evidence there. He seems to have gotten a good preseason this year so could that help him hit the ground running? Chelsea have another preseason match but I'm not sure he will be risked but let's see...

  26. Pinturicchio
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    Almost without exception, you can write off "Player X/Team Y is a slow/fast starter" narratives as meaningless. The ultimate in small sample size yarn-spinning.

  27. george jp
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    a good 7.0 midfielder plz... i was thinkin willian but not sure.

    1. leisuresuit13
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 8 months ago

      Chadli in great form plus Henderson will have all liverpools set pieces

  28. leisuresuit13
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    RMT??
    Schmeichel(fabianski)
    Mert - Azpi - Francis (bassong,Angella)
    Haz - Chad - Sig - Hendo (coq)
    Roo - Pelle - Giroud

  29. dribbler
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    great article thanks

  30. SC not pearls before swine
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 8 months ago

    Did hazard really only have three assists in his first 3 games for Chelsea? I remember it being about 29 while Mata got nothing 🙁