Opinion

The Burning Question – When to Free Hit?

The mourning period was suitably brief when Fantasy Premier League (FPL) announced the demise of the unloved All Out Attack chip.

Its replacement, the Free Hit, has vexed managers for a considerably longer period, with a number of theories as to its best use being touted.

The consensus was to save it for one of the inevitable late-season blank Gameweeks when sides drop out of the league schedule because of FA Cup commitments.

But even that has created confusion.

Should the Free Hit be deployed in Gameweek 31, when the FA Cup quarter-finals take place, or during the semi-final weekend of Gameweek 35?

And there’s even a school of thought that argues for the chip to be saved for the final Gameweek of the season to take advantage of plum fixtures and the teams with rather more to play for.

We asked Mark and our panel of Fantasy experts – reigning FPL champion Ben Crabtree, runner-up Uwais Ahmed and Career Hall of Fame top dogs Jay Egersdorff and Peter Kouwenberg – the latest in our series of Burning Questions: When is the optimum time to play the Free Hit chip?

Uwais Says…

When the Triple Captain and Bench Boost chips were introduced, it was fairly apparent to most within the FPL fraternity that they were to be used in conjunction with a Wildcard to take full advantage of the double Gameweeks in the latter part of the season.

Things, however, are not so obvious with the new Free Hit chip.

In pre-season, there was a lot of discussion that the FA Cup quarter-final weekend in Gameweek 31 would probably be the most opportune time to use it.

But I am of the view that if you have not yet deployed the second Wildcard, it might be an idea not to commit to the Free Hit chip then.

I took the view from quite early on that if the FA Cup draw was kind and did not pit too many Premier League clubs against one another in the early rounds, there was a great likelihood that we would see Premier League clubs going the distance in the competition.

In the last two seasons, the FA Cup has boasted an all-Premier League semi-final line-up, and I anticipate that to be the case this year, too.

If Spurs beat Rochdale at home in their fifth round replay, you just have to wonder how much value there is to use the Free Hit Chip simply to maximise returns from the four matches that currently make up Gameweek 31.

Looking at the upcoming schedules for the teams guaranteed fixtures – Liverpool, Everton, Watford, Bournemouth and even West Brom (although when you are bottom and seven points adrift, it is difficult to gauge what is a good fixture) – we have enough time from now to build a squad to ensure we have a respectable outing in that Gameweek.

We can then look to use our Wildcards soon after to take advantage of double Gameweeks as they have huge potential for explosive returns and could make the difference in our mini-leagues if prepared and executed properly.

We can then implement the Free Hit chip for Gameweek 35 – the FA Cup semi-final weekend – when there will be a bigger round of fixtures to choose from than in Gameweek 31.

These will include Arsenal at home to West Ham and Liverpool away to West Brom, and possibly even Manchester City vs Swansea City and Chelsea at home to Huddersfield.

Jay Says…

Short answer here is nobody knows!

While I think that planning is vital as we head into the final part of the season, it doesn’t make sense to me to plan for an eventuality when we don’t yet know the full facts.

Gameweeks 31 and 35 will throw up blanks, and Gameweeks 34 and 37 could throw up doubles.

But the Premier League have been known to catch out FPL managers in recent seasons with creative ways of rescheduling fixtures, the Gameweek 28 rearrangement of Arsenal v Man City being a prime example.

I remember Crystal Palace v Everton and Aston Villa v QPR fixtures being shunted into unexpected Gameweeks in recent seasons, so I can’t stress enough the importance of planning with the information that is definitely in front of you, NOT the information that could be in front of you.

FPL managers need to remember there are plenty of points to play for in Gameweeks 28-30, so taking one’s eye off the ball in the short-term planning department could be a dangerous strategy.

Peter Says…

I think anyone who tells you that a specific approach to the Free Hit chip is “clearly” the best approach is wrong.

For me, there are so many factors to consider – number of existing “blankers” in your squad, club priorities changing towards the end of the season, form, etc – that the decision whether to play the chip in Gameweek 31 or 35 really could go either way.

I’ve been going in circles playing out both scenarios and have even toyed with Wildcarding next week.

If pushed, though, my current feeling (possibly influenced by spending my Triple Captain chip so prematurely and profligately) is to cling onto that Free Hit chip like Scrooge grasping his last shilling for as long as possible.

Personally, I don’t subscribe to the school of thought which suggests that using the Free Hit in Gameweek 38 might be a masterstroke because those fixtures tend to throw up unpredictable results and rotations.

But I do favour the idea of wildcarding in Gameweek 32/33 in preparation for the double Gameweeks and using the Free Hit to deal with that (no longer quite as pesky) Gameweek 35.

Having read perfectly compelling and convincing arguments about both approaches, I decided upon my preference through the “revolutionary” approach of simply sketching out my team for the next few Gameweeks (including anticipated transfers, but ignoring the effect of injuries etc) “Sliding Doors” style.

Ultimately, I was happy to ride with an extra Stoke City/Liverpool player using free transfers until Gameweek 31 and couldn’t see a huge upside to using the Free Hit chip to flood my team. Everyone is going to have three Liverpool players regardless of their strategy, and I’m lukewarm about the other fixtures.

My prevailing feeling is that I’m not prepared to sacrifice the chip in Gameweek 31 just to crowbar in another two or three of the less fashionable players from unpredictable teams.

Retaining a bit more flexibility for the dying embers of the season – when we know who will be fighting, rather than holidaying, on the beaches – tempts me more than the lottery of which third Stoke or Bournemouth player could strike it lucky in Gameweek 31.

Ben Says…

In terms of setting up a much-needed strong finish to the season, I’d prefer to play the Free Hit in Gameweek 35.

This is based solely on being able to Wildcard in Gameweek 33, which would set me up for the remaining matches while ignoring the headache of factoring in who doesn’t play in Gameweek 35.

However, assuming Spurs beat Rochdale so their fixture with Newcastle vanishes from the Gameweek 31 schedule, I currently have just four players playing that week, with Jonjoe Kenny and Oumar Niasse making up half of them.

I have time to beef up this number with transfers, or can play the Free Hit, but the lack of appealing fixtures in Gameweek 31 make it a tough call.

I can either gradually bring in average players over the next few weeks to the incremental detriment of my team, or play my Free Hit to create the worst squad I’ll have ever owned in what could be a really low-scoring week.

The difference between fielding 11 and six players might amount to just 10-15 points, whereas using the Free Hit in Gameweek 35 means I can set a Wildcard team to take full advantage of the double Gameweeks 34 and 37.

There will also be more – and better – teams playing in Gameweek 35.

I didn’t know my answer when I started writing, but holding onto the Free Hit for Gameweek 35 is now my decision.

All of my next transfers won’t be aimed at Gameweek 31 as I want some Arsenal players after their Man City fixture, but I’ll add a few in and accept a low score in what is likely to be an underwhelming week.

Mark Says…

While it’s always wise to leave options open, the onset of Gameweek 31 means that we have to arrive at some kind of decision on our strategy in order to plan our four or five transfers between now and then.

I currently own six active Gameweek 31 players, though two of those names – Jonjoe Kenny and Collin Quaner – stretch the definition of “active”.

Still, with five free transfers remaining, I’m set on going into Gameweek 31 with seven or eight key assets, maybe more if a name emerges that warrants a points hit.

That is one very strong argument to keeping the Free Hit back for Gameweek 35.

The potential of the Bench Boost in Gameweek 34 is the other.

We’re not certain on what Gameweek 34 will present us just yet, rotation risks could actually limit the effectiveness of this chip quite considerably.

But then by saving the Free Hit for Gameweek 35, I would give myself maximum flexibility to exploit the double Gameweek that will surely arrive the week before.

No matter how many teams we get playing twice in Gameweek 34, knowing that I have the Free Hit to play immediately after to salve the damage inflicted by the blanks, offers me total freedom.

Hopefully, that can translate to an effective Bench Boost, and it will be the points from that, rather than my Free Hit tally, which could be the pay-off that really counts.

Conveniently, we will know the FA Cup semi-final line-up and therefore the full Gameweek 35 picture immediately after Gameweek 31. That should reveal the potential make-up of the Gameweek 37 doubles.

Having all our chips available with that information will likely be significant.

654 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Junior ⚽
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Ditch or hold Son?

    Can move him onto Eriksen for free.

    1. Mark
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 17 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Depends on what other issues you have. I think Son starts at Palace still, though his role is now under far more threat and he will likely only get 70 mins.

      If you really have no other squad concerns and can't benefit from rolling it over, then it may make sense.

      1. Junior ⚽
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Like yourself Otamendi to VVD is booked in for my first FT.

        The new signing of Lucas and the return of Lamela is quite worrying and I’d like to invest in Spurs’ good run.

        I’m either going to opt for this move (Son to Eriksen) or Ogbonna to Maguire so I can keep Alonso.

        The comparison tool points to Eriksen too.

    2. CRO KLOPP
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Him or Mahrez for me, leaning towards Mahrez

  2. JurgenRodgers
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Great Article:
    As I’ve already used my Free Hit..
    I’m currently looking at
    Gw28 Save
    Gw29 2 Arsenal players (Monreal Mkhitaryan)
    Gw30 Save
    Gw31 2 Fts to field 9
    Gw32 target Dgw player
    Gw33 same as above
    Gw34 10 Dgw players alongside Salah, Lukaku triple captain WBA whu
    Gw35 try & field 11 hits if necessary
    Gw36 Wildcard
    Gw37 BB
    Gw38 Pray

  3. subhojit123
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Pls suggest one of -
    1. J Ayew
    2. Walcott
    3. Mikhitarian
    4. O niasse
    5. Arnautovic

    1. Mayor of Flair
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Mikhy

  4. IAWC ( It's a Wonderfu…
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    A) son to mane. Keep kun
    B) kun to firmino. Keep son
    C) son to mahrez and kun to firmino
    D) son to erik and kun to firmino
    Have 2 fts and money not a problem
    Replies and reasons plsss
    I am just really torn?

  5. Pap Le Cissier
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Let’s try that one again on the current article...

    Is anyone thinking of holding Otamendi this week considering Arsenal’s poor defensive showings from set plays?

    1. Mark
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 17 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Mentally, I'd already booked in the move to VvD but you do raise a good point on Otamendi. He looks a certain starter too.

      I have two FT's and part of the allure of the change was the funds that selling Otamendi freed up.

      1. Pap Le Cissier
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Likewise. I think there’s a strong case for keeping him this week.

        I was the same as you but might consider shifting og instead.

      2. jia you
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Hi Mark, there seems to be so much VVD love on the site these days! My feeling is that Robertson is a better pick than VVD as he now looks pretty nailed on, is very attacking and much cheaper. Thoughts?

        1. HVT
          • 13 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          See below, going Robbie allows me Wilson over Niasse too which is a big appeal

          1. jia you
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 2 months ago

            Yep, I went Rob for Valencia which allowed Shaqiri to Mahrez which I'm happy to take a hit for.

    2. DGW blindness is for Kinnea…
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Strange how everyone is debating how to get rid of Otamendi Alonso and Jones

      1. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Been trying to get rid of Ota for weeks. No value any more.

    3. WVA
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      I'd save and keep

  6. jia you
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    I think I might captain Wilson this weekend but have a feeling Sanchez is going to do well. Both Mahrez and Eriksen also quite decent punts imo. Salah will be my VC but can't be arsed going with the herd!
    So who would you choose out of these four as a differential captaincy punt?

    A. Wilson
    B. Sanchez
    C. Mahrez
    D. Hazard

    1. Mayor of Flair
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      C

      1. jia you
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Hmm he is tempting me mate! Feel he has a point to prove, in the shop window and always seems to give his all. Feel Stoke might get a battering in an upcoming fixture also and this could be it! Cheers.

  7. Mayor of Flair
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Sterling -> Mahrez

    Now the Incredible Sulk will be putting himself in the shop window again and City's fixtures looking tough?

    1. jia you
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      I've got rid of KDB which was a really tough move but feel it's the right time to sell City assets. I may be way out of order but going with my gut! I'd sell Sterling in a heartbeat.

  8. Mind över Mata
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Who to shift for VVD:

    A) Christensen
    B) Alonso

    Fab / Adrian
    Jones* / Alonso / Christensen / Otamend / Duffy

    1. Mayor of Flair
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Ota for me

    2. HVT
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Christy

    3. WVA
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      A

  9. Sadio
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    On a wildcard.

    Which duo would you opt for here:

    A) Vertonghen and Mkhitaryan
    B) Trippier and Mahrez

    Pickford | Foster
    XXXXXX | Maguire | Robertson | Mee | Daniels
    Salah | Eriksen | XXXXXXX | Doucoure | Fraser
    Kane | Aubameyang | Firmino

    1. Zilla
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      A

    2. WVA
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      A

  10. We ain't got no histor…
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Shall we consider Robertson an option as an economical option to Liv defence? Or is his place under threat from Milner?

    1. HVT
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      I am, don’t think so.

    2. Virgil Hilts
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Triple Liverpool attack for me.

      3 home games in next 4 where they could score loads, and rotation issues (not to mention clean sheet issues) in defence.

      Robertson, Moreno, and Milner can all play LB. Virgil might be rotated to build full match fitness, Matip, Loveren, Klavan could all play a part.

      Gomez, TAA both fighting for RB with an England international returning to fitness as well.

      I’m seeing what Salah, Firmino and Mane will do at least until GW31.

    3. jia you
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Have bought him for Valencia, cracking value imo and looks to have nailed his place now...time will tell!

  11. BigAsGiroud_
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Currently have 4 GW31 players
    with 4 FT I can have this team for GW31:

    Daniels VVD
    Salah Siggy Walcott Shaqiri
    Firmino Wilson

    it's ok for GW31 ha?

    1. WVA
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Yeah 8 is fine

  12. HVT
    • 13 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Robertson last 12
    Played 90 - 10 times
    Played 74 - 1 time
    Played 0 - 1 time

    He’s nailed ain’t he?

    1. We ain't got no histor…
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      You never know with Klopp. He does frees up some funds

      1. HVT
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Yea and maybe we could argue the same about VvD?

    2. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      I’d love to think so. Looks a real bargain.

    3. liiusions
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      That's with Moreno injured. Klopp will rotate our full backs like he has done all season when there's 3 games in a week

    4. Alnair
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Favored over Moreno for sure.

  13. Virgil Hilts
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Sorry for ignorance regarding Free Hit, but.....

    Is it like a Wildcard when you have to be careful not to confirm a transfer that you have value tied up in a player if you decide to bring him back in after all.

    Eg. You bought Sterling for 8.0, currently priced 9.0, so you have 0.5 equity. You decide to Free Hit for GW35 and confirm Sterling out early in the week but injuries/news persuades you to return him in.

    Do you get him back for your original purchase price of 8.0, or have pay 9.0 but having banked 0.5 only?

    I know this is a trap on Wildcard, does the same trap apply on Free Hit?

    1. kennethrhcp
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      you're team will revert to last week's team after the FH week... so you'll go back to the original sterling value in your scenario above.

      now in relation to selling sterling & rebuying him while on the FH... i'd imagine you pay current market rate (i.e. waste a fair chunk of funds for the mix up)

      1. kennethrhcp
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        *your

      2. Virgil Hilts
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        I think this trap looks most likely to exist on Free Hit, just like on Wildcard.

        Be useful to know for all members still to use FH whether it is the case, or not.

        Sterling is just one example of where you could come unstuck by playing around with various FH line ups and actually making the transfers.......

    2. I Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      No, doesn't apply on Free Hit. He'll be back in your team at the same price you originally paid for him.

      1. I Member
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Sorry, didn't read your question properly. No idea what would happen if you sold him on FH and wanted him back before deadline.

        1. Virgil Hilts
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Yeh, I would like to mess about with my FH chip as much as possible but know about the Wildcard problem when confirming transfers out then changing your mind.

          Just wondered if anyone who’d played FH could clarify?

          Surely someone has fallen foul of it, if indeed the trap is set! 🙂

          1. Rupert The Horse
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            6 years, 2 months ago

            You’d lose the value for sure.

            1. Virgil Hilts
              • 7 Years
              6 years, 2 months ago

              Thanks Rupe, I was guessing as much and certainly will not be risking pressing “confirm” on any players with equity until the last minute.

              Makes the FH just that bit more dangerous 🙂

  14. King Kohli
    • 11 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    How would you improve this team?

    Courtois Elliott
    Otamendi Jones Alonso Duffy Kenny
    Salah Sterling Son Walcott Milivojevic
    Kane Firmino Quaner

    2 FT 1.5 ITB

    Appreciate feedback

    1. stuzig
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      I'd sub Kenny out for a guaranteed starter to cover injury / rotation risks. Ideally someone who'll play in GW31.

      Huddersfield & Bournemouth fixtures look decent if you want someone cheap, or VVD if you don't mind spending what's ITB

    2. Home Late From Age
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Otamendi to VvD and save the second FT. After this GW you'll have a clearer picture and can focus on upgrading Son to Eriksen or maybe Elliot for a playing BGW keeper (Pickford, Lossl)

  15. Zilla
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Anyone know who will take Mangala's place? Will it be Holgate?

  16. liiusions
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Hazard to Mane with a FT? Looking at the fixtures it should be an easy move but I really want to keep Hazard for some reason...

    1. jia you
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      ...for some reason...nailed on, in form, on pens, CHE battling for top 4. Hazard head and shoulders above Mane imo regardless of fixtures. Take away that CL hattrick against a broken team and Mane would be hardly mentioned on here! Cue hattie at the weekend 😉

  17. Miguel Sanchez
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    City currently 16 points clear of second place so could conceivably have the title won in GW33/34. Therefore, is rotation likely then on as Pep gives some of the youngsters game time and rests players for latter stages of the Champions League.

    Does anyone know if he does rest and rotate heavily after title wins when at Barca and Bayern? Any websites that will have team info from games in these seasons?

    Thanks.

    1. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      There’ll be a lot of rotation but will still put at a premier league quality squad to show respect to all the other teams whose season isn’t over.

  18. Rhinos
    • 10 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Liverpool may be cruising past Porto but it doesn't mean there won't be rotation. Last thing Klopp will want is Porto winning at ht and the subsequent squeaky bum time, besides regardless of scoreline someone has to play in that game, won't put 11 kids out there. Id be bit worried bout Vvd and Mane personally

    1. liiusions
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      VVD and Mane aren't crucial to the way we play, they are the most likely to be rested imo. Salah and Firmino will start

      1. Rhinos
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        that's my exact point

    2. Alnair
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Firmino, Salah, Robertson and Vvd probably won't play.

      1. Rhinos
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        im talking bout Newcastle few days before. Be logical to play your best defender in a game where not conceding many gets you through

        1. Alnair
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Think about it, if Klopp doesn't rest his best players for the Porto game then when else can he do it? The next CL opponent is almost garantueed to be a big team and don't forget that Klopp's job ultimately depends on Top 4.

  19. stuzig
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Which 2 to play this week from Richarlison / Shaqiri / J Ayew?

    Richarlison has the better fixture, but Shaqiri and Ayew have the better form

    1. Home Late From Age
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      tough one..I say Rich and Ayew

  20. Alnair
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Am I correct in saying that the following games are confirmed for Bgw35?

    Arsenal vs West Ham
    Everton vs Newcastle
    Stoke vs Burnley
    Watford vs Crystal Palace
    West Brom vs Liverpool

  21. Dr. DOOM
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Sell one for VVD.

    A. Alonso
    B. Jones
    C. Ota

    1. Lingardium Leviosa.
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Well, Jones is the only one pretty much sure not to start so...

    2. WVA
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      B

    3. Home Late From Age
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      B if confirmed as injured

  22. Lingardium Leviosa.
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Jones > VVD -4?

    Whm will score against Pool. I know it.

    1. I Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      If you know West Ham will score you probably shouldn't take a hit to get van Dijk then.

      1. Lingardium Leviosa.
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Guess I set myself up there 😀

        1. I Member
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          To answer your question though, depends on if Jones is fit and if he isn't who do you have coming in for him. I'm most likely bringing in van Dijk but not for -4.

          1. Lingardium Leviosa.
            • 9 Years
            6 years, 2 months ago

            Dunk. And I have Naughton starting 😮

            I guess the problem I'm having is should I ditch Jones with Man U's sketchy fixtures and bgw

    2. liiusions
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      You've answered your question then

      1. Lingardium Leviosa.
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Not my wisest moment!

  23. Saka Rice
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    2FT and 0.5ITB

    Courtois (Pereira)
    Jones Otamendi Mee Gomez (Otamendi Bauer)
    Sterling Lingard Hazard Salah Choupo
    Kane Firmino (Quaner)


    A) Lingard+ Sterling >Mahrez+ Delofeu
    B) Lingard>Delofeu (Save 1 FT)
    C) Otamendi+Lingard> Vertonghen+Delofeu
    D) Otamendi+Lingard>Mariappa+Mahrez
    E) Sterling+Lingard+Otamendi>Mahrez+Vert+Delofeu
    F) Sterling+Otamendi>Vertongen+Mahrez

    I don’t think Everton or Stoke will do much in the next 2 away gameweeks.

  24. Hotdogs
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    I have to say I wish there was someone pushing for deploying the FH chip in GW31 among the scouts! There's usually at least one dissenting voice even in situations that are more cut and dry and that's what makes the discussions more interesting.

    There's clearly a decent amount of people in the community planning on this for various reasons. For me it's due to a lack of GW31 starters in my squad at the moment (just 2) and GW31 being an important H2H match in my ML.

    1. Rhinos
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      they're not god, if fhc31 feels rigt to you then go for it

    2. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Well their opinions on what to do a based around their own squads and situation. If they’re set up nicely for gw 31 then they’re not going to argue to use it then.

    3. jia you
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Yeah, I even sold Shaqiri this week. FH31 was always my plan as I wanted to use my WC beforehand. So much negativity about using it in 31 on this site which I find a little strange tbh. Gives peace of mind I guess to say there is nothing but fodder apart from LIV but I feel the likes of Siggy, Coleman/Baines if fit, Dawson, Wilson, Rondon and others could do very well and the key being you revert back to a powerful team in 32.

  25. JurgenRodgers
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Best possible Captain, Triple Captain Gw34?

    Kane MCI NEW
    Aguero tot BHA
    Lukaku/Sanchez WBA whu
    Salah BOU
    Hazard sou bur
    Aubameyang new lei

    Kane or Lukaku for me look the standouts at present, alot will depend on Europe I suppose

    1. Rhinos
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      sanchez all day long

    2. WVA
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Kane is the safest option

      Not Lukaku!

    3. SW6
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      If Aubameyang picks up some form he has the best fixtures imo.

  26. IAWC ( It's a Wonderfu…
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Son to:
    A) Eriksen
    B) mahrez

    1. CRO KLOPP
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      I'm going for B

      1. IAWC ( It's a Wonderfu…
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        Edging to that to. And mahrez being a big reason y i shipped hazard. Feel i need to get that points back over next 3

        1. CRO KLOPP
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 2 months ago

          Eriksen has CL and fa cup replay,so two more games,and I have Kane so why not spread risk

          1. IAWC ( It's a Wonderfu…
            • 6 Years
            6 years, 2 months ago

            Thats also a thing but the main factor with mahrez remains how he is mentally

            1. CRO KLOPP
              • 6 Years
              6 years, 2 months ago

              Yes, that's a big ? Maybe he will want to play for transfer in summer

              1. CRO KLOPP
                • 6 Years
                6 years, 2 months ago

                And Eriksen isn't on all set pieces,with Davies on some corners and Kane on some free kicks
                I think they will score similar,but Mahrez cheaper and I can watch Leicester games with someone in it
                GL

  27. czechow
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    can anyone answer this question for me: If you do use your transfer in GW 34, Free hit in 35 (thereby not using a FT), do you get 2FT for 36?

    1. czechow
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      I.e. does the FH save your FT that you haven't used in that GW

      1. Kings of Lyon ★
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        No

    2. I Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      1 FT

      1. czechow
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 2 months ago

        that's annoying

  28. JoBro
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    so when should I play my triple Captain? GW 37 for the double fixtures?

    1. I Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      That's what most are planning to do.

    2. kennethrhcp
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      if BB'ing in the first DGW then the 2nd is def (imo) the best place to plat TC

    3. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Why don’t you decide yourself? My spoon is back at the office.

    4. Kings of Lyon ★
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 2 months ago

      Whenever you think it will miximise points. GW34 GW37 and GW38 all great shouts.

      Arguably, we should have TCd Aguero

  29. Feyzi
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    Perfect forum and enlightening discussion that selas the answer for me. No FH at GW31 and none in GW38 either. Possibly in GW35.

    One additional point for not using it in GW38 is that, the FH is an advantage also because it allows you to revert to your earlier team. This is an added value and GW38 FH's will just be the gamblers of the lot.

  30. Where dahoud at
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 2 months ago

    GTG
    Who to captain?

    Pickford
    Alonso, Alderweireld , vvd, martina
    Erikson, mane, de bruyne
    Vardy, kane, ayew

    Bench, elliot, kennedy, francis, cork