369
Scout Notes

Guardiola says Aguero is “exhausted” as Mahrez and Sane disappoint

Manchester City – and Sergio Aguero‘s relieved owners – were reliant on a soft-looking penalty to overcome a stubborn West Ham United side on Wednesday evening.

Fantasy managers who owned City assets could have been forgiven for feeling a little short-changed given that the Hammers were dispatched 4-0 at the London Stadium in November but a combination of excellent defending from Manuel Pellegrini’s side and perhaps the ill-effects from a gruelling EFL Cup final on Sunday made this a tighter affair than anticipated.

Pep Guardiola had plenty to say on Aguero, Riyad Mahrez, Bernardo Silva and City’s injury situation, which we cover in our Scout Notes below.

We also run the rule over Arsenal 5-1 Bournemouth and Southampton 2-0 Fulham.

Manchester City 1-0 West Ham United

  • Goal: Sergio Aguero (£11.7m)
  • Assist: Bernardo Silva (£7.5m)

Pep Guardiola said Sergio Aguero (£11.7m) was “exhausted” after the Argentinean striker followed up his exertions in the EFL Cup final with an 85-minute run-out against West Ham United on Wednesday.

Aguero had played the full two hours of Sunday’s gruelling clash against Chelsea and was back in the City line-up again last night, with Gabriel Jesus‘ (£10.7m) hamstring injury again keeping the Brazilian striker out of action.

Aguero scored from the spot after Bernardo Silva (£7.5m) had been felled by Felipe Anderson (£7.2m) but otherwise didn’t get too much change out of West Ham’s impressive defence, with Angelo Ogbonna (£4.2m) blocking his only other significant effort of the match.

Guardiola said in his post-match press conference:

We cannot live, for example, with just Sergio. The last 10-15 minutes he was exhausted. We need Gabriel as quick as possible to come back.

Those comments may unnerve existing and prospective Aguero owners ahead of Gameweek 29 but there was no indication from Guardiola that Jesus would be back for Saturday’s trip to the Vitality Stadium, with the City boss having this to say on the club’s injury situation:

That’s why it is a final for us, the game against Bournemouth, to arrive after the international break, with the people coming back, like John [Stones], Aymer [Laporte] and Gabriel [Jesus]. When you play every three days, in March and April, it is demanding, we need everybody.

Aguero’s cause last night certainly wasn’t helped by the displays of Riyad Mahrez (£8.2m) and Leroy Sane (£9.5m) either side of him, both of whom were sacrificed before the hour-mark as Guardiola threw on the rested Bernardo and Raheem Sterling (£11.3m) with the game still goalless.

The difference in City’s goal threat was palpable, with Bernardo’s driving run leading to the decisive penalty award and Sterling being presented with two excellent chances – one saved, one poked wide – after his introduction.

Those two players will now surely start at the Vitality Stadium on Saturday and Guardiola could even use Sterling as a “false nine” if he wishes to hand Aguero a breather.

Guardiola explained why he had made those two substitutions:

Another pace. We needed a little bit more. We arrived in the positions of the wingers and we didn’t finish what we created.

Bernardo is so aggressive – going with the ball he attracts two or three opponents and creates space for Danilo, Kevin and the others. He’s a master. He’s an incredible player reading those situations.

The game was 0-0 and we needed that step forward.

The hosts had only had one shot on target before Aguero’s penalty as Sane and the fragile-looking Mahrez toiled on the flanks but Guardiola defended the Algerian winger after full-time, citing his lack of match sharpness as a mitigating factor:

Riyad played good. He took some risks and unfortunately he hit the first player often. Normally he is so clinical, such a good player at finishing in the first action with the right foot, but of course, sometimes you need time to connect between the players and that is going to happen.

Sane has now been hauled off before the hour mark in each of his last two Premier League starts and his latest performance – the German winger didn’t register a single shot or key pass – will do little to stem the mass exodus among his existing Fantasy owners.

Another nail in his coffin could be the return to fitness of Benjamin Mendy (£6.1m), whose availability has often determined Sane’s game-time in the past.

The French full-back was an unused substitute at the Etihad on Wednesday though Guardiola stressed after full-time that Mendy is “not completely ready”.

Kevin De Bruyne (£9.7m) and David Silva (£8.5m) had lively starts to the match before their influence waned somewhat.

Silva should have been on the scoresheet at least once but turned De Bruyne’s cross onto the post from close range and then saw an effort cleared off the line in the second half.

“El Mago” recorded an astonishing 18 touches in the West Ham box last night (11 more than Aguero) though there was again the sense that the veteran midfielder was struggling to recapture his top form.

Both De Bruyne and Silva had also started the EFL Cup final and Guardiola may be forced to play them again on Saturday, with Ilkay Gundogan‘s (£5.4m) services required in the Fernandinho (£5.3m) role.

Guardiola said of Gundogan:

It is his natural position. The other players have to adapt to that. Fabian [Delph] could play there but is injured again. Gundo played many times in that position last season so normally he has to help us in the next few games.

City’s defence had a comfortable evening as West Ham mustered only two shots on goal, though Ederson (£5.6m) had to be alert to push out an excellent Andy Carroll (£5.4m) chance in the second half.

Carroll led the line in the absence of Marko Arnautovic (£6.8m), who had been set to play before illness struck on the day of the match.

Manuel Pellegrini said:

We were very unlucky that Marko Arnautovic woke up ill with a fever because we wanted to have a good recovery in our box, have three fast players up front with Antonio and Anderson to make good counter-attacks.

Anderson and co predictably saw little of the ball as the Hammers were penned back in their own half, though the visiting defence impressed as they limited City’s goalscoring opportunities.

Ryan Fredericks (£4.5m) particularly excelled at right-back, while teenage debutant Ben Johnson (£4.0m) did well enough on the opposite flank.

Pellegrini explained his decision to start Johnson, who was himself forced off on 62 minutes.

Masuaku is injured, Cresswell broke his toe in the last game, Zabaleta is just coming back from a back injury that he was not able to play the full game. Unfortunately for him, this was his first game!

But he didn’t do so bad, he had good answers every time they tried to attack down his side. I changed him not for his performance, he had a calf problem.

Pellegrini hailed his side’s defensive efforts in his post-match presser:

We defended very well as we walked on all their moments in attacking well. I think the first big save from Lukasz Fabianski was minute 61, after that, they had a couple of chances so if we lose that way maybe you can accept it more.

They had lots of shots at the beginning of the game but they had to rush them as we always had a defender near them, they had a lot of offsides also. I think that we played very well in defending, not so well in attacking because we didn’t have the possession we wanted.

Especially, well, we played this game with eight players injured and four players rested for the game on Saturday.

Those rested players included Javier Hernandez (£6.1m), Mark Noble (£4.8m) and Robert Snodgrass (£5.0m), who may come into the reckoning when Newcastle visit east London on Saturday.

Manuel Lanzini (£6.4m) got another 45 minutes under his belt, too, as he continues to build up match fitness.

Manchester City XI (4-3-3): Ederson; Danilo, Kompany, Otamendi, Zinchenko; De Bruyne, Gundogan, David Silva; Mahrez (Sterling 55′), Aguero (Foden 85′), Sane (Bernardo Silva 57′).

West Ham United XI (4-2-3-1): Fabianski; Fredericks, Diop, Ogbonna, Johnson (Zabaleta 63′); Obiang, Rice; Antonio, Nasri (Lanzini 46′), Felipe Anderson (Diangana 77′); Carroll.

Arsenal 5-1 Bournemouth

  • Goals: Mesut Ozil (£7.9m), Henrikh Mkhitaryan (£6.7m), Laurent Koscielny (£5.4m), Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang (£11.0m), Alexandre Lacazette (£9.5m) | Lys Mousset (£4.9m)
  • Assists: Sead Kolasinac (£5.1m), Mesut Ozil, Henrikh Mkhitaryan x2, Lucas Torreira (£4.8m) | Dan Gosling (£4.7m)

Unai Emery provided an update on Sead Kolasinac (£5.1m) after Wednesday’s 5-1 win over Bournemouth.

The Bosnia and Herzegovina international was substituted after 57 minutes of Arsenal’s comprehensive victory over the Cherries but Emery seemed to downplay any suggestion that Kolasinac would be a doubt for the north London derby on Saturday.

The Gunners’ head coach said:

Kolasinac has been having a problem in his [leg] muscle and sometimes he is telling us to rest some matches and some minutes.

The first half he finished it well, but in the dressing room he was saying he can continue, but he was feeling some pain. He could continue but I preferred to change him for a rest and also he played on Sunday with a big intensity.

Today I think we could do this change and carry on with another player in this match.

The rampaging defender again found plenty of joy at left wing-back as Emery switched to a 3-4-2-1 and it took just three minutes of Wednesday’s match for Kolasinac to register his seventh assist in 16 Gameweeks when he teed up Mesut Ozil (£7.9m) for Arsenal’s opener.

Kolasinac had a shot of his own blocked and laid on a couple of opportunities for Henrikh Mkhitaryan (£6.7m) and Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang (£11.0m) before being hooked, perhaps with one eye on the trip to Spurs on Saturday lunchtime.

Mkhitaryan is another player who may have been preserved for that fixture when substituted on 64 minutes.

By that point, the Armenian had got on the scoresheet and assisted a further two goals and it was both he and Ozil who particularly caught the eye at the Emirates.

Operating just behind Aubameyang in a 3-4-2-1, Ozil and Mkhitaryan were gifted plenty of space by a generous Bournemouth backline and combined beautifully to score Arsenal’s second goal.

Mkhitaryan then assisted goals for Laurent Koscielny (£5.4m) and Aubameyang to bring his FPL points tally to 30 for the last two Gameweeks.

It is doubtful Arsenal will encounter an opponent as obliging as Bournemouth again this season and the Gunners next face their north London rivals and Manchester United before blanking in Gameweek 31.

Nevertheless, Mkhitaryan is a mid-price midfielder to monitor for the season run-in: Arsenal avoid any of their fellow “big six” clubs from Gameweek 32 onwards.

Emery was asked about whether Ozil and Mkhitaryan’s displays have made them tough to drop for the derby at Wembley but offered his usual rambling answer in reply:

We are speaking and we want to get our identity first, be competitive – and being competitive how? First is being organised with our quality and skills, our combinations with different players in different systems and it depends in each match.

After is the intensity with the ball and without the ball. The last matches we are doing this. Saturday is the same, but with every player can be okay. This is what we want and I think every player is convinced to do that, and we can use different players in different matches, but the idea is that every player can play with this idea.

Now, I am going to watch this match for the analysis and I am going to watch Tottenham and after decide our gameplan against them with every player. We need the players in the first 11 and on the bench, and we need a big commitment from every player to help us.

Aubameyang and Lacazette traded places for this victory over Bournemouth, with the French striker starting on the bench but emerging to seal Arsenal’s victory with a beautifully taken free-kick.

Aubameyang’s owners endured a frustrating Gameweek 27 and yesterday evening threatened to be just as irksome, with the Gabon international seeing his first three shots blocked and coming within a whisker of an assist when Ozil struck the post following a swift break. Aubameyang then looked to have scored Arsenal’s third goal, only for replays to confirm Koscielny’s initial shot had passed way over the goal-line.

The premium forward duly got the reward his persistence (and owners) deserved when he latched onto Mkhitaryan’s through-ball and rounded Artur Boruc (£4.0m), before his evening drew to a close when being substituted on 71 minutes.

That early-ish withdrawal will provide some encouragement to his owners regarding his involvement in Gameweek 29, though second-guessing Emery and his ever-changing formation is nigh impossible.

The Arsenal boss meanwhile said Granit Xhaka (£5.2m) was merely rested and expressed hope that Koscielny would be fit for the weekend after the veteran centre-back received a “kick” late on.

This was deja vu for Bournemouth, who have now lost their nine away league matches in a row, conceding 28 goals in that time.

Their defensive display at the Emirates will give plenty of hope for owners of Manchester City assets ahead of the reigning league champions’ trip to the south coast on Saturday, though the Cherries are an altogether tougher prospect on home soil: Eddie Howe’s side have kept clean sheets in three of their last five matches at the Vitality Stadium and are unbeaten in that time.

Lys Mousset (£4.9m) poked home what turned out to be a consolation goal after an error from Matteo Guendouzi (£4.4m), while Ryan Fraser (£5.8m) wasted an excellent one-on-one opportunity in the first half.

It is now seven straight blanks for the Scottish midfielder, though the Cherries’ fixtures improve drastically from Gameweek 30 onwards and Callum Wilson (£6.3m) may be returning to fitness around that point.

One Bournemouth asset who is ahead of schedule in his recovery is David Brooks (£5.0m), who was an unused substitute last night and who may come into contention on Saturday.

Dominic Solanke (£4.7m) missed the defeat with a thigh injury, however.

Howe was bullish when asked if he would change his tactics:

No, I don’t see an alternative. We have to be better at delivering what we’re trying to do. We started poorly and you can’t start games in that manner against anyone. The ownership is fully on us, the style of play is not the issue it’s a combination of different things.

It [the away form] hasn’t been enjoyable at all and I speak on behalf of the players for that. Results have to change, they will at some point but we are giving everything to put things right.

Howe also commented on Mousset’s display:

He did OK, the team didn’t have a lot of the ball and we were reliant on the counter-attack, but he took his goal well. He did have other moments of joy but it was a tough night.

He’ll be judged on goals and those moments and he took it well, they look easy but they never are as easy as they look. But ultimately I can’t shell out too much individual praise on a tough night.

Arsenal XI (3-4-2-1): Leno; Sokratis, Koscielny, Monreal; Jenkinson, Guendouzi, Torreira, Kolasinac (Iwobi 57′); Mkhitaryan (Lacazette 64′), Ozil; Aubameyang (Suarez 72′).

Bournemouth XI (4-4-2): Boruc; Clyne, Mepham, Ake, Smith (Rico 70′); Ibe (Daniels 56′), Gosling, Surman, Fraser (Surridge 80′); Mousset, King.

Southampton 2-0 Fulham

  • Goals: Oriel Romeu (£4.2m), James Ward-Prowse (£5.1m)
  • Assist: Nathan Redmond (£5.3m)

Fantasy managers who are planning on bringing in Chelsea assets ahead of Blank Gameweeks 31 and 33 would have been further encouraged by Fulham’s meek display at Southampton on Wednesday.

The Blues head to Craven Cottage on Sunday to face Claudio Ranieri’s strugglers, who have now conceded two or more goals in each of their last eight Premier League matches.

No top-flight club has conceded more goals, shots in the box or “big chances” than the relegation-threatened Londoners in 2019.

The Cottagers occasionally threatened on the south coast, with Aleksandar Mitrovic (£6.5m) twice firing shots over from acute angles and Ryan Babel (£5.5m) hitting the bar with a deflected effort, but Angus Gunn (£4.3m) wasn’t seriously troubled by any of the visitors’ four shots on target.

Indeed, only West Ham (away at Manchester City) registered fewer penalty box touches than Fulham in Gameweek 28.

The fact that the “Tinkerman” has frequently switched personnel and formation in recent weeks suggests he is, several months into his appointment, still uncertain as to his best starting XI and system.

Ranieri chose what was surely a must-win game to trial a 4-1-2-1-2 diamond, bringing the likes of Kevin McDonald (£4.2m) and Andre-Frank Zambo Anguissa (£4.4m) in from the cold, with the cries of “you don’t know what you’re doing” from the visiting support highlighting just how desperate the situation now is in west London.

The Fulham manager said after the match:

I played the diamond because they are used to playing in the middle and after if they don’t find a solution they go on the flank then make a cross and I want this because if I put the wingers, they are more powerful than my wingers and then we go always behind, behind, behind.

If I play with the diamond, I have two strikers and Cairney forward to try to do something.

Tonight, they [Southampton] first shoot at goal and score and I think when this happens the confidence goes down, we try to do our best but that’s it, the maximum my players can do.

There will perhaps be limited interest in Southampton assets over the coming month, with the Saints facing a Blank Gameweek 31 and matches against Manchester United, Spurs and Liverpool around it.

James Ward-Prowse (£5.1m) was perhaps the pick of Southampton’s players last night (registering three shots and as many key passes) and got on the scoresheet for the fourth time in seven Gameweeks, tucking home the rebound after Nathan Redmond‘s (£5.3m) shot had been saved.

Ralph Hasenhuttl hailed Ward-Prowse after the game:

I think he shows in every game that he’s not only a hard-working guy, but he can also come into positions where he has the chance to score.

Against Arsenal, he had two situations where he could score, so it’s not a coincidence that he’s scored four times – maybe he’s in a position that’s a little bit more offensive-orientated that allows him to score a little bit more.

He’s the complete package at the moment that fits perfectly in our game.

Budget FPL midfielder Oriel Romeu (£4.2m) had earlier opened the scoring when his shot found its way through a crowd of players following a half-cleared corner.

Having been deployed “out of position” as a central striker in recent weeks, Redmond was moved to a wider role in a 3-4-3 on Wednesday, with Ward-Prowse operating on the opposite flank.

The Southampton striker situation continues to give Hasenhuttl headaches, though: already without the injured Danny Ings (£5.4m) and Michael Obafemi (£5.0m), Charlie Austin (£5.5m) again failed to stake a convincing claim to the centre-forward role and it could well be that Redmond is moved back centrally when the Saints visit Old Trafford on Saturday.

Hasenhuttl said of his strike options ahead of last night’s match:

We have a few options in the back and I think Redmond showed that he can be a striker who scores. He is very flexible, and I am positive. I trust every player I have.

Longy has shown that he can score.

I think it’s also a part of quality that when you come on in a match and show that you can always be part of a scoring situation.

I think Chaz [Austin] showed this. He is a very good substitution player and I think it’s easy if you come in the game after 60 minutes when the opponent is a little bit tired.

You come in fresh and fully motivated and know that you can put some pressure on them.

Maya Yoshida (£4.1m) returned to the Saints defence for the first time since the Asian Cup, while Ryan Bertrand (£4.8m) was recalled at wing-back and looked a threat down the left flank.

Southampton XI (3-4-3): Gunn; Bednarek, Yoshida, Vestergaard; Valery, Romeu, Hojbjerg, Bertrand; Ward-Prowse, Redmond, Austin (Long 64′).

Fulham XI (4-1-2-1-2): Rico; Odoi, Nordtveit, Ream, Bryan; McDonald (Sessegnon 69′); Chambers, Anguissa; Cairney (Vietto 69′); Mitrovic, Babel.

369 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Rik Waller
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    a - Son/Auba > Haz/Higuain (-4)
    b - Son/Auba > Haz/Vardy (-4)
    c - Son/Auba > Sterling/Higuain (-4)
    d - Son/Auba > Sterling Vardy (-4)
    e - roll transfer

    1. Reckoner.
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      f - Auba > Higuain free transfer

      1. Rik Waller
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Captain Higuain?
        Other options include Salah, Pogba, Son...

      2. DMP
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        I did Auba to Higuain.

        If I’m going for an hit, pherhapps I’ll move to Sterling(c). But considering keeping Son.

    2. maaaaloney
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      I'd roll should be goals in the derby

  2. Atimis
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Are you WC after GW33 or 34?

    1. Bury94
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      GW34 for me

    2. Pieterke30
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      WC 24 or sth.

      Nah, didnt pay off

  3. maaaaloney
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Having trouble with the bench spot between Arnautovic Rondon & Jota. I feel confident in Arnie for Jota if confirmed fit. Do I have it wrong? Currently looking like this...

    Fabianski
    Robertson Periera Doherty
    Sterling Pogba Salah Hazard Jota
    Jimenez Rondon

    Arnautovic AWB Bednarek

  4. Atimis
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Best defensive option from Pool?

    IMO VVD or TAA over Robo but which one??

    1. Bury94
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Depends on budget. Robbo is best but TAA still a great option if you can use the extra money elsewhere

    2. maaaaloney
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      TAA is great fun but there's consistently a risk that he doesn't play, personally, I'd go VVD for the assurance of starts, though I have Robbo and have no reason to get rid.

  5. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
    • 14 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Have AWB & Doherty just been costing people points for months?

    They've not been overly special for 20 gameweeks or so

    2 points per GW would be 40 points in the last 20 fixtures

    In that range:

    Doherty - 61 points
    AWB - 53 points

    At one point in time they were deliriously good, popping up with great scores for next to nothing... for months however they have been 5.5 & 4.5 defenders performing like glorified 4.0's

    1. Pieterke30
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      True. But Doherty has always been 4.4 in my eyes. Thats what I paid for him.

      1. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Would the 5.0 of SV be better used elsewhere? Specifically Newcastle, Burnely, Leciester - teams with good fixtures & players returning points...

        Especially with Wolves imminent bad run from GW30 onwards

    2. maaaaloney
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      AWB is a 4.0 or at least was when most of us got him.

      1. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Are the likes of Bednarek/Bardsley matching/exceeding him for less? And would an extra 0.1/0.2 to get Schar/Lascelles/Tarkoswki etc pay off handsomely?

        1. maaaaloney
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          I have Bednarek but can't recall a week where I wanted to play him on purpose regardless of how well he has or hasn't done.

          1. maaaaloney
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            Also both Doherty and AWB have outperformed Bednarek since 16 by a reasonable margin

            1. maaaaloney
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 11 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Same for Bardsley

          2. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
            • 14 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            Despite Southampton's unglamourous nature, AWB is actually around the same level as Bedna & those guys on FPL points, there's not a massive difference.

            He is a superb prospect IRL however, and when you have a 4.0 guaranteed starter who scores that highly in the first 4-5 weeks, for a decent defence, and can even pop up with 3 baps in a defeat there's no harm in holding

            His scores have been suprisingly underwhelming however, its amazing the difference 0.5m on a price tag can make

            1. maaaaloney
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 11 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              There is a difference though, both players have 2 more games worth of marks on gameweeks that it was actually reasonable to start them in the first place. Additionally, I can't see wanting to play Bednarek over AWB in any game week for the foreseeable future, at least until 34ish, if I were even in a situation where I would want to play Bednarek.

              1. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
                • 14 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                And I think it's that preference for AWB that has been costing people points for 20 GW's potentially when there are better options, some for a teeny tiny smidgen of budget more

                1. maaaaloney
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 11 Years
                  5 years, 1 month ago

                  I don't consider having AWB as even a preference though? Because he's a playing defender that cost me 4.0. I'm not sure what "value" I'm missing out on, as he's a perfectly acceptable bench piece in my team and I'm not in a situation where "I'm missing out on points" by switching him to another 4.0 defender that I wouldn't ever really want to play either. You're looking at AWB as if he were a player I just bought and could transfer to a 4.5 playing defender but for most, this is simply not the case. I guess there's an argument to say sure you'd rather have a defender that plays in 31 over him, but I don't think it's worth wasting a transfer on, and that person isn't Bednarek. Regardless there are far more problems with my team than AWB "underperforming" (which he isn't) because he's a playing defender at that price point.

                  1. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
                    • 14 Years
                    5 years, 1 month ago

                    Admittedly he can be considered a useful member on an FPL squad due to his original price, he's very very benchable, and as we have only 38 FT's, hokey cokey-ing around cheap defenders may not have yielded much more than AWB's 2-ish PPG...

                    But is there a potential false sense of security that comes with having picked him up at 4.0? A FOMO that he's unsellable becuase he starts games, when in reality he's delivered 2 PPG for 20-odd weeks & that is a level of returns that requires scrutiny...

                    1. Superbadhine
                      • 13 Years
                      5 years, 1 month ago

                      4.0 is bench fodder....he has been an over-performing bench fodder.

                      I don't really get what you're trying to push.

                      1. Superbadhine
                        • 13 Years
                        5 years, 1 month ago

                        Reply Fail

                    2. maaaaloney
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 11 Years
                      5 years, 1 month ago

                      Again he may cost you 4.5, but that's not how much he's worth to almost all of his ownership. Like most, I can sell him for 4.2. There's not another 4.2 outperforming him. There's certainly not a fear of missing out by selling him, because I don't really ever PLAN on using a defender in his price range. I don't know what you're expecting points-wise from players in this range, but it's certainly not MORE than 2 points per week, and even still he's scoring more than 2 points per week even in the "random" gameweek you're referring back to. Additionally, the example you've given as equal or better replacements for him have averaged LESS points than him since they started playing in GW 16. You also keep using gw 20 as a starting point for his decline when he scored 8 points in gw19. Did Bednarek score more than him this week (when he was injured)? Sure. Does that mean I'm missing out on future Bednarek points? Not at all.

                  2. Superbadhine
                    • 13 Years
                    5 years, 1 month ago

                    Have an upvote

                    1. maaaaloney
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 11 Years
                      5 years, 1 month ago

                      thanks

    3. MTPockets
      5 years, 1 month ago

      You know you don't have to play them every week right?

    4. Tev
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Wolves' great defensive stats made it impossible for me to get rid of Doc, as well as the value tied up. He's been unlucky I think.

      1. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        He certainly has been unlucky, he could have gotten a lot more attacking returns (how many near misses) and cleansheets in the same timespace, and his form, fixtures and price tag made him a very good FPL prospect, it just didn't work out

        1. Tev
          • 6 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Such a shame, but the blow is softened by the fact I got most of his hauls before he was mainstream, and I've shared the pain of his flop with the masses 😉

        2. DaisyDaisyDaisyDaisy
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Let alone FA Cup form

    5. DaisyDaisyDaisyDaisy
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Doherty is still looking like a right winger and I think more points will come...

    6. Snevitz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      But you don't play them every week, you get to pick and choose depending on fixture.

      1. Pieterke30
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        I play Doherty very week

      2. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        AWB yes, and just as well although he did return away to Man Utd so benching in tough games wouldnt necessarily solve the 2 points per game problem...

        Also not sure too many would bench Doherty though, despite averaging 3 points per game for the last 20 GW's, he returned against Chelsea & Spurs, which wouldn't help a ''benching in tough fixtures strategy'' to increase his 3 PPG

        No doubt that on value they served a very useful FPL purpose early on... but very underwhelming last 20 GW's or so

        1. SPorting
          • 12 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          AWB -> Diop and job done.

        2. Snevitz
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          I rotate Doherty loads, he averages much higher than 3 points per game for me.

          1. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
            • 14 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            He's gotten 3.3 PPG in the games you've started him this season - 47 points in 14 apps

            Not shockingly bad, but hardly earth shattering - for 5.0-ish its probably ok and he could have easily notched more attacking returns which would've helped

  6. Hawkies7
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    I still have FH, TC and WC.

    Can someone provide a rough guideline of best weeks to use them?

    1. Tev
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      FH in 32 and TC 35 looks amazing if you can gear your squad towards coping with the two blanks.
      Personally, I'll have 2 West ham (HUD, che) 3 Liverpool (ful, sou) 2 Bournemouth (NEW, BUR) and a few others with fixtures in both the blanks to allow this strategy.

  7. Tronity
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    AWB > TAA with this weeks FT?

    Fix has his point projection as really low though, whilst Robertson's projected points are high. Any particular reason for this?

    1. Snevitz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Yes, they are wrong.

  8. DaisyDaisyDaisyDaisy
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    So whats the shout on the best GW31/33 team with a sprinkling of assets to keep? My thoughts

    Keeper (no preference really)
    3 Pool
    3 Leics
    2 Chelsea (attacker/def maybe)
    B'mouth attacker
    Newc defender (in the hope they get a 33)

    Keeping Pogba, maybe one of Doc/Jimmy and in my case I have Digne who I don't expect a lot from. West Ham? Have become a bit of a minefield with a dodgy backline, lots of mids competing and Arnie being Arnie.

    What worries me is I can see Millwall and Palace winning in FA Cup which would bring Spurs and Watford assets into the mix for 33. Guess that can be dealt with in 33 itself though...

    1. Snevitz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Yes, something like that should do well.

    2. pingissimus
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      3 Leicester is definitely one too many in my view.

      1. DaisyDaisyDaisyDaisy
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Possibly, bit swayed by the fixtures and already having Barnes and Periera. But surely some new manager bounce and Vardy has a track record of coming good in these circumstances.I think 2 attackers is possibly the shout.

  9. Top Lad Dakes.
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Looking like Auba to Higuain and roll the other FT and mega$$$ ITB, at this point.

    Plan on Mane and maybe a NEW defender in for the BGW.

    Meaning Aguero+City-less saga continues another week. May be tempted by Aguero in for one game vs WAT if he’s rested this wkend - otherwise, Rashford to King/Wilson and get Kun on WC34! 🙂 lord help me

  10. Tev
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Logical to captain Hazard over the likes of Salah and Auba, right?
    59th mins shocker could be a blessing in disguise, rested before Fulham of all teams...
    Lovely differential too, 10% top 10k ownership, not that I can associate myself with those elites since my 4 week disasterclass... Maybe not having Hazard is the reason they're there and I'm not 😉

    1. Superbadhine
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      (C)Kun for me and (V)Haz

      But I agree with your points

  11. Snevitz
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Hazard scores incredibly well against the worst teams in the league, its why he ends up near the highest points scorers in the game despite sometimes going weeks without doing anything.

  12. jtreble
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Brazil just called up Jesus. :).

    1. jtreble
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      ... but not Fernandinho. Odd.

      1. jtreble
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        ... Alisson, Ederson, Danilo, Fabihno, Anderson and Firmino also selected.

  13. ppv
    • 13 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Ran sacked

  14. finnish92
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Aguero or Higuain for next two gw? I am worrying about Aguero will be benched....

  15. Mcgugan
    • 13 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Is Robertson > Duffy so I can afford Sane > Sterling (c) for a -4 madness?

    FH in 31.