What is the Members Season Ticker and how do I use it?

I love top of the page fails.~#

It makes me feel so alive.

At some stage Bournemouth will need to start offloading players. Of the bottom 14 they’ve spent pretty much as much net as anyone else since they came up - on a par with WH for instance which seems odd given resources.

Mings want to go to villa and will be sold as a profit - good news all round.
Of more worry would be poaching around Ake

Dragowski purchase for gk
Worry is the attractiveness up the field of Fraser and Wilson
But the manager will attract and purchase well again

2-1
1-2

2-1
2-1

2-1
3-2

Depends on price and his opening fixtures for me. If he is 5.5 then I'll consider

The wonders of google.....

Years ......Team ...........Apps .....(Gls)
2006–2008.. KTP ....29 ......(3)
2008–2010 Sevilla Atléti.c .17 ......(3)
2009–2010 Sevilla .........1 ......(0)
2010–2011 HJK ................25 ....(13)
2011–2013 Schalke 04 .37 .....(8)
2013–2014 Celtic ........26 ......(7)
2014–2018 Brøndby .......130 .....(55)
2018– Norwich City ..........43 .....(29)

It's a fixtures ticker.
May as well make all Man City games blue going on your thinking.

Following it blindly is fundamentally flawed but if you apply a bit of sense it’s still very useful. It’s probably the members feature I use the most, as did our world number one!

Would be useful to be able to toggle between the current absolute numbers of the opposition and the relative numbers which take into account both teams involved in the fixture.

I don't see a problem with all Man City's fixtures being blue, it that's what the ticker spits out in relativity mode. That's just information based on numbers. Useful stuff!

And the whole point of the ticker is surely that we don't have to apply sense to see who has the best fixtures. Because numbers. We can use it how we want, but applying sense to transform the fixture colours into a scale of who has the best fixtures in relative terms and sorting them in our head.... Doesn't seem likely to be a robust method with the same level of resolution that's currently in the ticker. And you wouldn't be able to apply any extra features to your mental schema, which may be added to improve the ticker, like add/remove specific fixtures from the sort.

So yeah, I agree that your method would be useful, perhaps even more useful. Though the more estimated elements you include, the less robust the. The absolute version is nice in it's own way, because the numbers are for pure fixtures. It shouldn't be a big issue, though, to toggle to relative numbers. We can already do that manually, but I can never be bothered.

https://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/news/2018/july/new-contract-for-son/

10

FFS 'differentials' tend to be under 5%.

Realistically, though, the number would change based on context. Every active player might want to buy a 4% owned player one week, which makes him a differential, but not a punt (not even a differential if everyone does buy him!).

Maybe you want different criteria for 'punting'. Maybe that criteria includes ownership.

But come GW38, you don't want to be buying 4% owned KDB after a few games back after injury and after a couple of hattricks, while every active manager wants him, but most managers are inactive after a period where player purchases have been focused around blank and double gameweeks when Man City wete undesirable on paper, so KDB's ownership hasn't yet sored, despite being one one the best FPL prospects at that moment. It wouldn't be great for your criteria to allow you to buy this man in this moment. 😀

No

Would Bale's injury record not be a concern?