FFS Cup

The latest FFS Cup fixtures and results

Round four of our FFS Open Cup and round three of our FFS Members Cup will take place in Blank Gameweek 29.

The previous rounds in each competition played out last weekend and we’ll delve into the results and fixtures in our regular round-up below.

For future reference, a shortcut to our FFS Cups page can now be found in the site’s top menu bar under ‘Community’.

FFS OPEN CUP

The results from the third round of our FFS Open Cup can be viewed here.

The draw for the fourth round of our FFS Open Cup can be viewed here.


Lokomotiv – who beat Sessegnon blanc 42-36 last weekend – is our only former winner left in this competition, following Leon Harris’ 47-65 defeat to Smelbow.

Lokomotiv will now take on Van der Faart in the round-of-128.

Sonova‘s score of 74 was not only enough to comfortably see off Hana, it was also the highest score posted by any manager in round three.

Barry Woj can count themselves unfortunate: despite posting an above-average score of 56 and rising to 2,131st in the world after a sixth straight green arrow, he was despatched by Jambot by a margin of just three points.

To put that in context, Fat Francs salad bar and Sriram progressed after registering just 37 points. The victory for the former was a notable one, as their opponent, Sofasogood, ended up on -7. The defeated manager appeared to not only confuse Gameweek 28 with Blank Gameweek 29, but they also (presumably) failed to activate their Free Hit chip and took a 48-point hit.

The Fighting Cock is our best-performing remaining entrant, sitting at 254th in the world.

Our only other round three participant who has a top 1k overall rank is ZeleniMD, who sneaked into 975th position and saw off im1974 by 55 points to 50.

EJAAZ11, now 800th, was eliminated by FPL Sweat.

FFS MEMBERS CUP

The results from the second round of our FFS Members Cup can be viewed here.

The full draw for the third round of our FFS Members Cup can be viewed here.


Our only remaining previous champion who entered this year’s tournament lives to fight another day.

Pep Pig saw off Fitzy. by a 54-50 margin and will now face DYNAMO MIMOMI in round three.

Gargamel‘s score of 75 was the highest posted in the second round of our FFS Members Cup and was more than enough to defeat sledger.

We had a five-way share of the ‘unluckiest’ manager of the round, with eggshapedfred (who was eliminated on a tie break), TICKING TOON BOMB, geordienufc1, Bragazeti and the aforementioned ZeleniMD all bowing out despite posting very decent Gameweek 28 scores of 55.

A.J., who sits at 263rd in the world, is our highest-ranked manager left in the competition and will next face KevIRL.

HOW DO THE CUP COMPETITIONS WORK?

The FFS Cup is very similar to the Fantasy Premier League’s own cup game.

Entrants who qualify for the first round were randomly drawn against each other and the winner of the tie is whoever has the highest score from that Gameweek, minus points spent on transfers (like in the original game and in head-to-head scores).

In the event of a draw, the manager highest in the overall FPL rankings after the tie will progress.

WHAT IS THE GAMEWEEK SCHEDULE?

FFS Open Cup

The FFS Open Cup competition will be played out according to the following proposed Gameweek schedule:

  • Qualifying – Gameweek 25
  • Round 1 – Gameweek 26
  • Round 2 – Gameweek 27
  • Round 3 – Gameweek 28
  • Round 4 – Gameweek 29
  • Round 5 – Gameweek 30
  • Round 6 – Gameweek 31
  • Round 7 – Gameweek 32
  • Quarter-Final – Gameweek 33
  • Semi-Finals – Gameweek 34
  • Final and third-place play-off – Gameweek 35

FFS Members Cup

The FFS Members Cup competition will be played out according to the following proposed Gameweek schedule:

  • Qualifying – Gameweek 26
  • Round 1 – Gameweek 27
  • Round 2 – Gameweek 28
  • Round 3 – Gameweek 29
  • Round 4 – Gameweek 30
  • Round 5 – Gameweek 31
  • Round 6 – Gameweek 32
  • Quarter-Final – Gameweek 33
  • Semi-Finals – Gameweek 34
  • Final and third-place play-off – Gameweek 35

WHEN ARE THE FIXTURES RELEASED?

Where possible, the fixture list for each round will be published before each Gameweek deadline.

PRIZES

Overall Prizes
The prizes for the FFS Cup is as follows:

1st Place: £150 Amazon voucher
2nd Place: £100 Amazon voucher
3rd Place: £50 Amazon voucher

73 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Atimis
    • 7 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Auba or Bale for next 2 GWs?

    Have Kane.

    1. tbos83
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Bale

    2. TheBiffas
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      i'll be taking a hit for both because i can't decide

    3. waltzingmatildas
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Struggling with this plus Lingard thrown in there as well.
      Leaning towards Bale

    4. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      I don't really like either in all honesty... Auba probably at a push because I'm very wary of Bale. He played really poorly last game, and doesn't play the full 90. And then he goes away for international qualifiers with Wales. I just think it's super unlikely he starts both. And when he starts he only gets 60 minutes too.

      1. Karan14
        • 8 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Completely agree with this. Im tempted to go Lingard over both of them.

  2. The Review: GW 28
    BigManBakar
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    The Review: GW 28

    Hi everyone, welcome to the latest edition of “The Review” where I look at Free Hit and the upcoming blank GW29 at length:

    (Data taken from FFScout with consent)

    Before I begin, I’d like to mention that I post about FPL on my Instagram too. Follow me there if you don’t already to show your support!

    http://instagram.com/bigmanbakar

    Q: Which players do I pick for my Free Hit squad?

    Down below, I discuss each fixture individually highlighting the players that should be picked for the Free Hit:

    - Aston Villa v Spurs:

    I start by running a comparison on Kane’s performances against the league’s top and bottom 10:

    Kane against the league’s top 10 v Kane against the bottom 10 after GW 10 (League rank for relevant stat among forwards given in brackets)

    Mins per shots inside box: 53.18 (10th) v 34.65 (2nd)
    Mins per big chance: 585 (26th) v 88.55 (2nd)
    Mins per expected goal involvement: 370.3 v 112.6

    Needless to say, Kane has had his fair share of struggles against better opposition. He has scored just four times in seven games against the top 10 after GW 10. I now highlight the difference in Spurs’ attacking numbers home and away:

    Spurs home v away this season (League rank for relevant stat given in brackets)

    Big chances per game: 2.71 (2nd) v 1.92 (11th)
    Average xG per game: 1.53 (6th) v 1.11 (13nd)

    As is visible, Mourinho seems to adopt a pragmatic safety-first approach away from home. These are the reasons why I believe the captaincy isn’t as straightforward as it may seem on paper, even though we are struggling to find better alternatives. I now look at Kane’s performances with and without Son given that the South Korean is an injury doubt:

    Kane with Son 20/21 v Kane without Son (sample used: the 5 league games Kane played without Son in 19/20)

    Mins per xGi: 138 v 138
    Mins per xG: 170 v 172
    Mins per big chance: 120 v 145

    The numbers are similar but it is worth noting how dependent Spurs have been on Son for creativity this term. He has created around 20% of Spurs’ chances this season while his big chance involvement amounts to almost 51%. Kane had other alternatives like Eriksen and Lo Celso to create for him last season when Son wasn’t around. However, it is worth noting that Villa’s defensive numbers have slumped over recent weeks which may play into Spurs’ hands:

    Aston Villa’s defensive numbers GW21-28 v GW1-20

    Big chances conceded per game: 1.78 v 1.38
    Average xG conceded per game: 1.41 v 1.2

    This may benefit Gareth Bale in particular who was called out by Mourinho for a “lack of intensity” this week. Kane is top among forwards for xGi in the last six matches and with Bale, presents FPL managers with a limited number of premium options with some sort of potential this week.

    Villa received a huge boost this week with the news that Grealish is back in training. Whether he is match fit or not remains to be seen but his influence on the team has been incredible:

    Villa with Grealish v Villa without Grealish this season

    Chances created per game: 11.31 v 8.8
    Big chances per game: 2.54 v 1.8
    Average xG per game: 1.58 v 1.19

    Grealish’s impact on Watkins’ numbers has been significant as well. Watkins is yet to record a big chance in either of the five games in which Grealish has been injured, having a meagre average xG of just 0.12. Before that, he had registered eight big chances with an average xG of 0.44 in his previous 11 appearances when Grealish was in the side. Watkins is now six matches without a goal now and even from the eye test, it was apparent how frustrated he was v Newcastle because every time El Ghazi had the opportunity to cross, he chose to cut in and shoot from distance.

    - Brighton v Newcastle:

    Brighton are this week’s odds-on favorites to win their game, keep a clean sheet, and score more than 2.5 goals this week (courtesy @Drafthound). Brighton are 3rd for xG and 1st for xG conceded in home games this season while Newcastle are 20th for xG conceded and 19th for xG in away games this season. As big of a mismatch as there can be on paper – Brighton v Newcastle is clearly the fixture to target this week! I'm aware that Brighton are 18th in the home Premier League table but their position does not do justice to their performances. Honestly, with those numbers as unbelievable as it sounds, they should be challenging for the Champions League! According to their xG numbers, they have scored 12 fewer goals than they should have done and conceded nine more goals than they were expected to – that is painful.

    Recent results might put people off Brighton defence but their numbers at home, whether defensive or attacking, have been borderline elite. Hence, I believe that we need to look at this home fixture vs Newcastle with far more optimism. I run a few comparisons to shed more light on the basis of my bullishness:

    Brighton home v Brighton away 20/21

    Shots in the box per game: 10.8 v 6.6
    Big chances per game: 2.4 v 1.4
    Average xG per game: 1.8 v 1.2

    Brighton home v Brighton away 20/21

    Shots in the box conceded per game: 4.8 v 6.7
    Big chances conceded per game: 0.8 v 2.1
    Average xG conceded per game: 0.8 v 1.2

    I now use my friend @FPLTIPSINDIA’s comparison on Brighton defenders over the past seven matches:

    Dunk vs Veltman vs White vs Burn (GW 22-28)

    Mins per Big Chance 630 vs 270 vs NA vs NA

    Mins per shot inside box 105 vs 77.1 vs 311.5 vs 117

    Mins per expected involvement 1032.8 vs 348.4 vs 5191.7 vs 568

    Mins per baseline BPS 6.6 vs 8.9 vs 7.6 vs 9

    That tells me that Dunk and Veltman are by far and away the Brighton defenders to get given their attacking numbers. Dunk's goal vs Southampton had a xG of 0.03 and Forster really should have had done better but that now takes Dunk up to second highest for most goals scored among defenders this season. He fares best among Brighton defenders for bonus accumulation too and will fancy himself against a Newcastle side who have conceded the highest number of headed attempts in the past six matches. Veltman is top among the league’s defenders for shots in the box and second for big chances over the past four matches but if Potter decides to use Groß as a wing back like he did in the second half against the Saints, then Veltman’s attacking threat as a centre back could be limited. Robert Sánchez has started 17 times this season and accumulated save points on just five occasions, so I prefer the Brighton defenders over him on a Free Hit.

    As far as the Brighton attack is concerned, they have scored more than one goal just seven times this season. Trossard was playing in an advanced position against Saints and has accumulated eight shots in the box in his previous five starts. He has scored just three times this season which is why Potter has challenged him to increase his goal and assist output. Maupay is the bookies’ favorite after Kane for anytime goalscorer this week but a quick glance through the forums tells me that Brighton fans anticipate Welbeck to be vital for their run in and expect him to chip in with crucial goals.

    - Fulham v Leeds:

    Despite having failed to score in their previous three league games, I’d still back the Leeds attack to break their duck here – particularly given that it’s an away game. Leeds are top in the league for shots in the box and in the top four for xG non-penalty in away games this season so pose a far greater goal threat on their travels.

    No Leeds player has returned more FPL points than Raphinha since he has started playing since GW9. He has had at least one big chance involvement in seven of Leeds' past nine matches. Noticeably, Raphinha has been playing in advanced positions closer to Bamford in recent times and hence it is no surprise that over the past six matches, Raphinha among midfielders is top for chances created and expected goal involvement while at the same time sitting second best for big chances created. Leeds will further be boosted by the return to fitness of Patrick Bamford who is a serial away day specialist – over the past six away games, he is ranked top among forwards for big chances created and shots in the box.

    Fulham will hardly be any pushovers though. They have kept five clean sheets in their previous eight matches, and even in the game against Man City where they conceded thrice they restricted City to just seven shots in the box which is quite some way down from Man City’s average number of 10.41 shots in the box per game this season. Andersen might be worth considering given how poorly Leeds defend set pieces.

    Contrary to popular opinion, Leeds at home have been decent defensively – at home, Leeds are ranked 9th in the league for xG conceded (vs 20th away), having an average xG conceded per game of 1.2 (vs 1.9 away) and conceding on average 1.7 big chances per game (vs 3 away). That tells me that Maja might be worth considering. Leeds have the worst xG conceded away from home in the league while Maja is in the top three among forwards for xG in the past six matches and during that spell has been involved in ∼63% of Fulham's big chances. Lookman is another interesting one as well – he is top among Fulham players for chances created in the past six matches but has been involved in just one of Fulham’s eight big chances. It will be fascinating to see who takes penalties for Fulham should a penalty be awarded given that Leeds have conceded the highest number of penalties in the league this season.

    Even though Leeds away have been leaky, it’s not as if Fulham have been prolific in front of goal either. Fulham are ranked 19th in the league for goals scored and xG over their past six home matches. This brings Stuart Dallas to the radar, who has more goals than any other defender in the league this season and is likely to play in an advanced position in midfield.

    - West Ham v Arsenal:

    Arsenal's attack might be worth targeting in the blank GW as well. I've noticed that Arsenal's numbers have shot up the charts in recent times. Arsenal over the previous six matches are second only to Man City for xG while in the previous six away games, Arsenal are best in the league for xG which bodes well for them ahead of their away fixture v West Ham. Aubameyang is top among midfielders for shots in the box, expected goals and expected goal involvement over the previous four matches and is a good differential captain for FPL managers willing to punt. He has four goals in his previous four starts so has form behind his back.

    Keep an eye out on Saka’s fitness. If he is fit, then he is definitely one to consider on a Free Hit as his numbers are great whenever he plays. If Saka is out, then Pepe is an interesting shout. In his last six league starts, he has accumulated 16 shots in the box. Arteta praised both Ødegaard and Smith-Rowe recently and they are also worth considering given how Arsenal line up in the Europa League.

    Arsenal’s defence has improved in recent times too. They are ranked second only to Chelsea for xG conceded over the past three matches which makes Tierney worth considering. Among all defenders who play this GW, Tierney is top for chances created in the past six matches and can exploit West Ham’s weakness on their right flank – only Newcastle have conceded more chances than West Ham down the right flank over the past six matches.

    It will be fascinating to see the approach that Moyes adopts this GW after he chose to park the bus and sit deep vs Man United. If he does adopt a similar pragmatic approach, it will have a knock-on effect on Lingard and Antonio. It is worth noting that West Ham have been more fluid with Lingard in the team this season:

    West Ham with Lingard v West Ham without Lingard 20/21

    Average xG per game: 1.59 v 1.36
    Big chances per game: 2.50 v 1.82

    Lingard is top for shots inside the box and second for expected goal involvement over the past four matches, while Antonio is second among forwards for xG over the last six matches. They are the ones to get from West Ham.

    Q: How to decide whether to Free Hit or not this week?

    As always, this is a very team specific question which is very hard for me to generalize and answer. I would say the bare minimum threshold not to Free Hit is perhaps seven playable players in GW29 without a hit, the significant majority of which should ideally be the ones I have highlighted in my analysis above. In this worst possible scenario, your red arrow shouldn't be as big as most others will be in the same boat as you. I would suggest you make a Free Hit draft, and compare the expected points of that draft with your current team. If you can see a minimum gain of 15 points through the additional players, then I would be in favor of Free Hitting.

    Ideally, I’d like to keep the Free Hit for the blank GW33 or the potential double in GW35 but I notice that we are underestimating the gain we can make just by accumulating base points and avoiding hits this week just because the fixtures/players are “unsexy”. Using Free Hit in GW33 has a high ceiling – there are clear fixtures to target but I believe it is somewhat manageable as most managers will be able to field 11. What stands out for me is that there is nothing that guarantees that the Free Hit squad you choose in GW33 will not outscore your current selection in GW33 which makes Free Hitting there a high-risk strategy.

    Q: Is loading up on differentials the best possible way to use the Free Hit?

    The upside play on the Free Hit is to pick all differentials and hit the players that haul while the template blanks. This is very unlikely in my opinion and not something I’d recommend. In my opinion, the best way to gain rank is to cover the main five to six template players, and fill the rest of your team up with differentials. This way you are guaranteed to gain rank without any risk and if your differentials perform, that green arrow will only be bigger. Given the chaos this week, most managers will be taking hits and fielding significantly less players than a Free Hit squad anyway so there’s a minimum gain of 10 points to be made, which could shoot to 25+ if the correct differentials are picked.

    Q: Some frequently asked questions about the Free Hit:

    (courtesy @WhoGotTheAssist)

    *Do I get my rolled transfers back if I Free Hit?

    No.

    *Does Free Hit wipe out point hits I have already taken?

    Yes.

    *Will my confirmed transfers before I Free Hit be in my team after this week?

    No.

    *Will I have to pay a higher price for a player I bought on a Free Hit (if they’ve risen)?

    Yes.

    *Do players in my team get affected, before I Free Hit, get affected by price rise/falls?

    Yes.

    *I have 2 free transfers. How many will I have next GW should I decide to activate the Free Hit this GW?

    1.

    Q: Manchester City assets – keep or sell?

    This is a very tricky question to answer given the fact that Pep has basically said that he is going to rotate “six to seven” players in every game from now on in. Man City are the standout team in the league this season so obviously selling their assets is tough, even when you consider that at best, they will play just three times in the next five GWs given their blanks in GW29 and GW33. I think Dias is the easiest one to keep, as the recent trends show that he is the most secure among the Man City defenders. I think Stones is worth keeping as well, because of the value that he offers – even if he misses the odd game at that price, he’s still great value.

    Cancelo is tricky because even though he is highly prone to rotation, I believe he has one of the highest upsides in the game as far as defenders are concerned. What I like about Cancelo is that he has just been subbed on once in the league this season and Pep doesn’t have a history of bringing full backs late on in games either, so Cancelo isn’t too susceptible to a one pointer. If you have a good bench, you can afford to keep him. I’m sure Gündoğan and De Bruyne both will start against Leicester after the break as Pep will see that as a tough game on paper. Gündoğan is tremendous value and De Bruyne is in the form of his life so they are risky sells before that game but I think a more compelling case can be made of selling either of them over the City defenders.

    Kindly do reshare the article if you liked it. If you are looking to follow my work, follow me at:

    Twitter: https://twitter.com/bigmanbakar

    Instagram: http://instagram.com/bigmanbakar

    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtIPFexB6PLKNNl0XH3SKKw

    YouTube Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thefplwire


    I await your feedback!

    1. Zogzeg
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Thanks for sharing, as always.

    2. TheBiffas
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      nice one!

    3. Pompel
      • 10 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Have an upvote!

    4. ritzyd
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      It's great work, i only skim these nowadays though. I personally used to prefer the format of these around this time last year when they were briefer and more to the point.

    5. Magic Zico
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      It's worth an article this regular one ... quite practical and consistent to look at the numbers! Great job! So, Pepe then?

    6. Lemongrab
      • 14 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Quite simply the best post every week. Thanks for the work you put in to this big man.

    7. Studs Up
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Nice!!
      City assets Q was relevant

    8. RAFA THE GAFFA
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Brilliant

    9. Peskey
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Very good article. People keep saying how FH is a waste in GW29, because there are only 4 games.
      I can field 8 players without hits, but I am forced to sell at least two out of Cancelo, Stones, Gundogan, Fernandes, Shaw, Digne, DCL, Son, which is not easy.
      With TC left, I am hoping to use it for that DGW (35?)

    10. The Ilfordian
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Thanks very much, great analysis

  3. Rossendale Rover
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Some advice please
    Current team for 29

    Areola (Martinez)
    Dunk Targett Dallas
    Lookman Raphina Son* Lingard
    Kane Bamford

    Ive got 1 FT. No chips left

    Would you save free transfer or transfer Son out for Aubemayang/Bale?

    Cheers

    1. TheBiffas
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      tricky. i think i'd hold

    2. tbos83
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      I would sub for Auba

  4. Kodap
    • 6 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Are my best moves here to do something like, Stones > Dunk, Son > Bale & DCL to someone...? I have 2FT and 5.8m in the bank.

    Martinez
    Dier - Coufal - Dias
    Son - Soucek - Raph - Gundo
    DCL - Kane - Bamford

    Bench: Areola - Salah - Shaw - Stones

  5. G Banger
    • 5 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    No FH, WC in 31 and used my 2 FT to leave 2.1 ITB with:

    Martinez
    Holding, Dallas, Coufal
    Auba, Lingard, Trossard, Raphinha,
    Bamford, Kane, DCL*

    (Pope*, Stones*, Cancelo*, Bruno*)

    Worth taking any hits?

    1. TheBiffas
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      g2g

  6. Ruinenlust
    • 6 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Would you rather a Spurs defender or a Fulham defender?

    1. TheBiffas
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      reguilon

      1. Ruinenlust
        • 6 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Is he nailed?

  7. George James
    • 9 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Best move?

    A + B Give me 8 plus son C give s me 9 plus son

    A) Barnes + Salah >> Auba + Lingard

    B) Barnes + Stones >> Lingard + Dunk

    C) Barnes / Salah / Stones >> Auba / Lingard / Dunk -4

    1. Reggie Nainggolan
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      A or C

    2. Bubbles1985
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      C

  8. jimbobmij
    • 9 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Odegaard or Moura?

    1. Laurel and Vardy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Moura (especially if Son confirmed out)

  9. FC Hakkebøf
    • 7 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Tierney, Regulion or Dunk? (not on a Fh)

    1. Studs Up
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Dunk for the fixture

  10. pingissimus
    • 5 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Wow the -48 in article above must have been painful. FH chip saved I suppose 🙂

    Is his GW 28 team a good or bad omen? Quadruple Brighton defence?

  11. Bubbles1985
    • 7 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Anyone else looking at FH and struggling to use all available funds??

    Not as many big hitters in this week except Auba and Kane!

  12. merin
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Who would you keep?
    A) Dias
    B) Cancelo

    1. Catastrophe
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Close, A for me.

    2. Thomas Jerome Newton
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      I'm going for some rotation risk midfielders so I'm choosing Dias.

  13. Reggie Nainggolan
    • 7 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Martinez
    Burn*
    Son* Ralp
    Bamford* Kane Watkins

    2FT available to make it 9 or -4 for 10. Previously was planning on getting Dallas & Auba/Bale & maybe -4 for Veltman
    However with injury plagued shall I use my FH?

    1. Catastrophe
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      I would use FH. Son is definitely out.

  14. Catastrophe
    • 13 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Help appreciated chaps, 1 FT, 0.5 ITB.

    Sanchez
    Dunk, Konsa, Cresswell
    Raphinha
    Kane, Watkins

    (Martinez, Shaw, Dias, Gundogan, KDB, Fernandes, DCL, Son*)

    A) DCL -> Lacazette
    B) Shaw -> Dallas/Tierney
    C) Son -> Lingard/Lookman
    D) Son -> Bale
    E) Something Else

    OK with a -4 hit...

    Cheers

    1. pingissimus
      • 5 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      I'd do Dias to Dallas looking at the next two weeks (rate Shaw over Dias for 30 and possibly beyond too) and leave it there. Wouldn't touch Son given GW30 fixture.

      1. Catastrophe
        • 13 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Cheers. I bought Dias at 5.5 so I would lose a lot of value and I think id want him back. Maybe I'll do that move and then consider Stones/Cancelo for GW31 (LEE).

        Cheers!

  15. AJ24
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Martinez (Johnstone)
    Coufal, Dallas (Shaw, Rudiger, Cancelo)
    Son, Lookman (Salah, Gundog, Bruno)
    Kane, Watkins, Bamford

    0.2m ITB and 2 FTs

    Intial thoughts are Son & Salah to Auba and Bale. With a view to get KDB next week.

    Thoughts please!

    1. AJ24
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Auba to KDB..

  16. Al-Chemy
    • 4 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Would you play Sanchez or Martinez?

    Sanchez/Martinez
    Veltman Dallas
    Raph Son
    Kane Bamford Watkins

    My main ML rival has two villa defenders and no Brighton currently. I'm thinking to bring in a Villa defender as well, if that sways your opinion

  17. Ruinenlust
    • 6 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Already have Dunk.

    Veltman, Reguilon or Adarabioyo?

    1. Magic Zico
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Tosin!

  18. TeddiPonza
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Current FH team looks like this. Big question is, who would you bench out of that lot?

    Sanchez Martinez
    Cresswell Dallas Reguilon Dunk Tierney
    Auba Bale Lingard Raphinha Trossard
    Kane Bamford Maja

    Thanks.

    1. Magic Zico
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Martinez Reguilon Maja and toss coin for the last one

  19. King of Kings.
    • 3 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Hi guys, would you use 2 FTs and a -4 for the following?

    Digne > Dallas
    Stones > Veltman
    Gundo > Auba

    Wanted Dunk or even Reguilon instead of Veltman but budget couldn't stretch that far.

    1. Al-Chemy
      • 4 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      I would, as even if they blank you should still be better off

  20. Ch0udini
    • 3 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Are there players you would get for a hit this gameweek?

    I am considering: Maja, Gross and/or Lingard.

    1. No Professionals
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      a hit in place of a blank is only -2 in reality, so it's less of a risk than taking someone out who will play and might get points themselves.

      but equally you want to be doing it for someone you want to keep for a few weeks, unless you are wildcarding out of it.

  21. Stupendous
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    All set? 3.5m itb no FT

    Martinez
    Dunk Dallas Cresswell
    Son Auba(c) Lingard(v) Raph
    Kane Antonio Bamford

    Pope Stones Gundo Digne

    1. Ch0udini
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      I guess so, no need to take a hit if you can field 11 players.

      1. Stupendous
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 1 month ago

        Took a hit for a punt on Auba and a bit of fun for a change!
        Thanks

  22. Sz21
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    2 ft. 0.7m ITB. No chips remaining.
    Doing Cancelo-> either Cresswell or Tierney with 1 ft I think but what would be your next move?

    Gundo -> Odegaard (fancy him to do well) or Lingard.
    Burn -> Veltman. (May even be worth a hit if Burn is out) Will play in 29/33.

    GW 29 team, 8 atm but 2 injuries to worry about!
    Martinez (Steer).
    *Burn, Dallas, (Cancelo, Shaw, Stones).
    Raphinha, *Son, (Salah, Gundo, Bruno).
    Kane, Watkins, Bamford.

    1. Ch0udini
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      I would do Gundo ->Lingard.

      He is well rested and has high return potential.

      IMO selling Burn for another Brighton defender is a waste. Not so much info and he can easily play.

  23. Chandler Bing
    • 7 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Current team:

    Areola
    Elmohamady (?) Reguilon Veltman
    Son (?) Raphina
    Kane Watkins

    A. Salah and Elmohamady -> Dunk/Dallas and Trossard (-4)
    B. Play FH.

    1. No Professionals
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      wouldn't free hit personally, hard to see where the upside is that week.

      Captain Kane covers it.

  24. No Professionals
    • 6 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    finally time to face my team

    Areola
    Dallas Burn*
    Son* Raphinha Lingard
    Kane Bamford (should be fit)

    Martinez De Bruyne Gundogan Digne Stones DCL Shaw
    1FT 3.6m

    combination of poor planning and injuries has put me in a poor position. Think it is a clear that it is not a week to chase points using multiple hits.

    Son to Bale and DCL to Watkins and just take my medicine?

    Any stand out transfers?

  25. dshv
    • 6 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Don’t have Kane.

    Captain?

    1. Rafinha
    2.Bamford

    Others: martinez, dallas, coufal, dunk, antonio, son

    1. No Professionals
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Raphinha

  26. Rotation's Alter Ego
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 12 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    New Community Article

    For those of you that enjoy our Community Articles, we have a superb first article from Akloppalyse who rounds up the various options available to those of you on a GW 29 FH. Well worth a read and leave any feedback you may have for the writer 🙂

    https://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/2021/03/18/why-blank-gameweek-29-is-the-optimum-time-to-free-hit/

  27. ChickenTikkaMoSalah
    • 8 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Bring in Dunk or Dallas?

    1. aleksios
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 1 month ago

      Both if possible.

  28. aleksios
    • 8 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    What to do here? 1 ft. 0.6itb

    --Martinez
    --Cresswell--Dallas--Targett
    --Lingard--Raphinia
    --Bamford--Kane

    --Johnstonne--DCL--Salah--KDB--Dias--Gund--Digne

    a) Salah+Dias to Bale+Dunk for a hit.
    b) Salah+KDB to Bale+Auba for a hit.
    c) any other ideas?

    Thanks all.

  29. No Professionals
    • 6 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Aubameyang being discussed as an option for this week. Do we think he even starts in light of the disciplinary issue, didn't even come on versus spurs?

    Guess the Saka injury helps his cause.

  30. tbos83
    • 3 Years
    3 years, 1 month ago

    Who would you start out of Antonio, Maupay and Laca?