Community

Why the Extra Free Hit Chip Disadvantages FPL Managers who Think Long Term

“FPL is a marathon, not a sprint.” It’s an adverb lots of FPL managers are familiar with, and one I personally like to conjure up whenever I’ve managed to put another hard-earned mini-league victory in my back pocket. Especially during the past few seasons – full of uncertainty and last minute changes – loads of managers have seen it pay off to play the game that way, as I did too. However, the sudden introduction of an extra Free Hit chip seems to diminish the advantages and points potential of those who think long-term.

On the one hand, there are the managers who were able to – perhaps by taking one or two points hits – field a full eleven in the past gameweeks 17 and 18. They could have chosen to play their one Free Hit chip either in a potential future Double Gameweek 22 (for which they otherwise would have needed to carefully plan and change their team structures if they wanted to get in loads of players with two fixtures) or in a future blank gameweek with FA Cup games (ditto, but to get in players with just one fixture). They can now use a Free Hit for both, neutralizing the aforementioned disadvantages of only having one such chip.

On the other hand, there are those who gazed upon their shambolic teams and chose to play their Free Hit chips in gameweek 17 or 18. Those managers knew they wouldn’t need it for a possible Double Gameweek 22, because they’d already have a lot of players in their teams with two fixtures. However, they would not have had a Free Hit to cover a future blank gameweek due to FA Cup games. What transfer headaches, ravaged team structures and future early Wildcards they now have been spared by this second Free Hit chip.

Managers who chose to field eight, seven or perhaps even fewer players in Gameweek 18, however, had probably calculated to take it on the chin on the short term and to profit from their decision later on in the season. More than a few of those had only just played their first wildcards and didn’t want to overturn all of their carefully calculated moves – myself being one of them. They chose not to alter their team structures nor to make opportunistic transfers, instead keeping their players as well as their cool, knowing they would reap the benefits of already having lots of players in their teams with two fixtures in a future double Gameweek. They could then play their free hit chip in a future blank Gameweek.

Either way, these managers would have benefited from both instances to recover from their recent setbacks, while others wouldn’t have been able to do so – at least not without a certain cost. They could have done so without having had to alter the structure of their teams, which would later on leave room for flexibility and even luxury transfers that others would not be able to profit from as much. In other words: their careful planning might have given them an advantage, that necessary edge, to turn their season into a successful one in the long run. By introducing the second free hit chip, that potential seems to have vanished.

Perhaps I’m speaking out of turn. These are uncertain times, and the second Free Hit chip may well prove to be advantageous to those who didn’t panic during the past few weeks. However, at the moment it feels like managers who think more than a few gameweeks ahead are being hard done by. There does not seem to be an obvious opportunity left to recover the points they have willingly lost, nor does it look like they will fully profit from keeping their team structures and plans intact. Being a marathon manager myself, I now feel that the future potential I and many others have banked on has been taken away, and that sprint managers are being doubly rewarded for their playing styles.

That being said, it will surely make for some exciting scenes during the coming weeks and months, with lots of triple digit scores to show for it. So however this second Free Hit chip pans out, I do fully intend to enjoy the rest of the season as much as possible, and I hope all of you do as well. In the long run, we might even have more fun. 

Stay safe and happy holidays to everyone.

Aaron

Opperkaker First discovered FPL after the 2010 World Cup. Late bloomer with two consecutive top 10k finishes only coming in 2020 and 2021. Loves a good differential, which more often than not results in going too early on them. Gooner and journalist.

28 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Rotation's Alter Ego
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 12 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    When the news first came out, I certainly felt hard done as well. The more I think about it though, the more I'm fine with it - even if I don't use my extra FH this week (as I probably will), there no doubt will be more Gameweeks over this Winter period where that extra FH will be very appreciated without having to sacrifice the fun / potential that comes with using FH during the blank double period. Happy just to see how this season plays out and what strategies pop up from it!

    Happy Holidays and thank you Opperkaker!

    1. Opperkaker
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      All in all, I too am mostly very curious about what the rest of this season will bring. It'll surely be a unique one at any rate, which should be loads of fun in itself.

      Cheers and good luck navigating the coming weeks/months!

  2. Diamondgeezer
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Maybe the free hit is to keep players interested in the game if things are not going well.
    I prefer the 1 free hit to an extra wildcard as I think that would disadvantage long term planners more.
    It also gives a little more variance and potential breaks the template a little. Hopefully this is it for changes though, to much and it becomes silly.

    1. dcolct
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      I agree. I think an extra FH hardly disadvantages the long term players, which would not be the case with an extra Wildcard. If more short term players have used a FH already, it just means they will have 1 remaining while the rest of us have an extra one. It is important that this is only for one gameweek and so is only a short term boost and so those who have the extra can use it on a Double GW instead which is arguably better than to fill an extra couple of spots anyway.

  3. Louis James
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    The tone of this strikes me as very self righteous. I had made a cpl moves around half an hr before original deadline when villa game was postponed. Suddenly my team was decimated by the last minute cancellation. This is what the extra chip is for. All the planning in the world cannot account for that.

  4. Lord.
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    I’m not a fan of changing the rules halfway through, and I don’t doubt that the motivation is to keep the masses engaged, but I’m not buying that it’s unfair on strategic planners. The first thing I do when the fixtures are published is work out when the double and blank game weeks are likely to be, and key fixture shifts, in order to assess what it means for possible chip strategies. However, it’s also inevitable that events will get in the way. I had a marvellous plan last season to exploit the DGW opportunities from the split game week without using a chip, and it would have worked but for late Covid cancellations. It’s happening again this year, but the planners will be better at navigating the chaos, and identifying opportunities, than those that play the game day-to-day.

    1. Opperkaker
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Fair point. Hopefully it pans out that way!

  5. third.time.lucky
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Dry your eyes, son - it is what it is, time to get on with it

    1. Opperkaker
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Fingers crossed for some of those Arsenal tissues in my christmas stocking! (They actually make those. I checked).

  6. MikeBravo
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    They have two versions of FPL at the moment; fantasy and draft.
    Why not make a third game where all 38 gameweeks are free hits?
    Those that plan and want to play the pure version can play fantasy, and those who are short term thinkers can play free hit fantasy.

    1. Epic Fail
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Bring back UFPL.

  7. DaisyDaisyDaisyDaisy
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Like most things in life it will be driven by money making

  8. Marknlard
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Adverb doesn't mean what you think it means!

  9. Martial9
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Does the second free hit chip last for the rest of the season?

  10. Saint Tim
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Many years ago, I played a draft league with my mates. Shearer was in his pomp at Newcastle and I blew a huge amount of my budget on making sure I had him in my team. As you will all remember, he broke his leg in a pre-season friendly just before the season started (and after we’d done our draft) and was out for six odd months. No way to remedy that easily, esp in a draft league where all the other decent striking options had been taken. Just rotten bad luck. No free hit here. That’s what fantasy football is all about. Skill. And luck. Sometimes it goes for you. Sometimes against you. Giving everyone a second free hit chip because they’ve been unlucky is complete and utter BS!

  11. Magfloat
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    You call yourself a "long-term" FPL manager, but then you write an article complaining about short term managers being able to play another free hit chip in gameweek 22 (3 weeks time)?

    If you really were a long-term manager then you'd be like the rest of us long-term managers and you'd be delighted that you have an additional powerful chip to wield over your short-term rivals.

    Think bigger than just gameweek 22/FA cup weeks and you'll start to feel differently.

    1. Opperkaker
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      I am thinking bigger than just GW 22 and FA Cup weeks though. That is part of the point. Short term managers now get to respond once more to future expected or unexpected fixture shifts without having to alter their team structures, which I think is arguably the biggest advantage of a Free Hit chip.

      Changing a whole team (or not having to) for one or a few gameweeks can impact many weeks or even months of your FPL season. It can lead to early wildcards etc. and could get you into a lot of trouble later on. Of course the extra Free Hit has potential for long term managers as well, but will it be as big in a "regular" gameweek? It might, it might not. This is merely an insight in the current situation and in the way I see things developing as it now stands. In a week's time, all may have changed again, of course.

      Enjoy the ride

  12. Fabreghastly
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    So, if I'm reading this right, all the people who have 1 FH chip left are going to suddenly do better than all of us with 2. All of us who have planned ahead are suddenly at a major disadvantage because we didn't rip our teams up, kept Ronaldo and also now have twice as many FH chips as the other guy. Must be something wrong with my maths skills cos I just don't get it 🙂

    1. Opperkaker
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 3 months ago

      Managers with one FH left didn't have to rip up their teams either, but already got the points in GW 18. Now they get another chance to respond to a double blank gameweek of their choice, without having to rip up their teams again, while managers with two free hits can maybe only use one which has the same impact. Maybe not, who knows. But as it now stands, that is the (dis)advantage I see. Feel free to correct me if you think I'm wrong.

  13. SuperG
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    I reckon most of those complaining are doing so because this FH addition has disadvantaged them. And those ok with it are happy because it makes their life better.

    Personally I’m in the middle in terms of impact. And my view is the change is purely another alteration to an already madcap period. So embrace the alteration and see it as an opportunity.

    Oh, and the best players will still rise to the top.

  14. Opperkaker
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    I just want to mention that this article was not meant as a complaint, but as an analysis about how the extra Free Hit chip may or may not affect FPL managers with different playing styles as it currently stands.

    I hope the community will read and discuss it that way.

    Happy planning to everyone!

  15. TubThumper
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Merrit to what you say here. But it's that Villa game, called off 30 mins before the deadline, last week that is the issue. Those of us who made (almost) last-minute transfers for a hit on that game got toasted well outside the realms of good planning.

    That has been further compounded now by Villa being postponed again this week. We've had points come out for what is two blanks....with the player transferred out potentially playing this week.

    Being in Australia I waited till very late at night to make a transfer in about 40 mins pre deadline. Wake in the morning and realised that was -4 for nothing......and now I'd be benefited from having the player I took out back as they have a game this week where Villa again don't.

    I fully agree that the additional Free Hit doesn't remedy this circumstance directly in any way, but it does at least give an avenue to plan recouping some of the damage instead of just being forced to suck it up.

    If it were possible the "fairest" thing to do in this situation would be to have given the option to reverse any transfers made on that game in the 24 hours prior to it being cancelled. But I understand that would also present challenges from a technical and logical perspective as well.

    Not sure if there is a solution that can adequately address situations like that, but maybe taking soring from only a teams "best 8 players" in rounds where more than one game is called off at short notice is an option.

    But it is fair to say that even people who plan quite extensively have been caught out by the events of GW18. It's certainly not a casuals vs "serious" situation.

  16. DF
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Adverb? Jesus.

  17. Stewhendricks
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 2 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    *proverb

  18. Damien Sartip-Zadeh
    • 2 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Advantages? Disadvantages? Could be either but positively will make things happen.

  19. Wrong Captain Choice - Ag i…
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    I can see the author's point of view but I disagree with it strongly. Because those who play fpl and have played for a number of years will invariably make more use of those who take the computer game less seriously.
    I now have two FH's in my virtual pocket. My team is in good shape thanks to a few -8's that I weighed up the pros and cons of.
    It makes the game exciting - less people following the 'influencers' like sheep. People playing the game are now forced to use their knowledge of the fixtures - PL - and covid news to make a decision.
    A bit of research is required quickly when making a decision.

    FPL finally has a bit of life in the game again - a bit of vibrancy - do people sell Salah or not etc
    New captains had to be chosen besides the lazy/easy Salah option this week gw19 for example.
    People had less time to be spoonfed. By the way noone who plays fpl are actual 'managers'.
    The term always makes me laugh.

    As the nearest to managing for many of the younger crowd who play is 'database management/managers - most don't even watch full games. And watching the games - is almost given a mystique now - 'the eye test'. It is just watching football!

    I obviously wish no one gets covid. But it had really opened the game of fpl up - which had gotten tired and stale. Ruined by stats boffins - who are confused when the underlying predicted stats do not yield returns.

    I would go further than the current one FH extra. I think everyone playing FPL should be given another four FH's used when they see fit - but not one after another. That would be real fun.

  20. BlueRaptor
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    This is exactly how I feel.

  21. BaltimoreCity
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 3 months ago

    Changing the rules of a contest after it starts is always a bad idea.