Community
20 December 2016 43 comments
tm245 tm245
Share:

Last season I posted an experiment, called In Search of the Dream FPL team,  looking at the Fantasy Premier League’s top players at around the half way stage to find out how much value and consistency they offered.

This article will revisit that experiment and apply it to this season with a close eye on pricing.

Cheap As Chips in 2015/16

At the Gameweek 16 stage I found I could purchase an entire Dream Team squad of the top scorers in every position (2-5-5-3) in FPL for just under the preseason starting squad budget of 100m.

Butland 4.9 (Gomes 4.7)
Smalling 6.9 Alderweireld 5.7 Kolarov 6.5 (Dann 5.3 Sagna 5.3)
Mahrez 6.9 Ozil 9.7 Barkley 7.4 Wijnaldum 6.9 (Ayew 7.1)
Vardy 7.6 Lukaku 9.1 Ighalo 5.9
99.9m spent

In essence, the article asked what would happen if you started playing the game in Gameweek 16 using the form of the first 15 gameweeks as your guide.  The experiment ran for several more weeks and those Dream Teamers fared reasonably well, as the subsequent weekly updates in the Comments section show.

Premium Problems in 2016/17

A year later, and the set-up is staggeringly different.  Here is this season’s Dream Team squad through the first 17 Gameweeks***.

Courtois 5.8 Heaton 4.8 10.6
Azpilicueta 6.4 Cahill 6.3 Walker 6.2 (Alonso 6.4 Van Dijk 5.7)
Sánchez 11.8 Hazard 10.4 Mané 9.4 Walcott 7.8 (Eriksen 8.6)
Costa 10.9 Ibrahimovic 11.3 Defoe 7.8
119.6m spent

***The maximum number of Chelsea players is exceeded here, so substituting the next highest scoring goalkeeper and defenders (De Gea 5.4, Daniels 5.1, Gibson 4.8) to replace Courtois, Cahill, and Alonso would still take the total spend to 116.4m for a buildable but unaffordable Dream Team.

What can we take away from this tale of two seasons beyond a Dickensian sense of longing?

With the relative costs of the back sevens for each season being so close (especially if you de-Chelsea your defense down to one instead of four, the costs are almost the same for each season), the incredible difference in price for the front eight merits a great deal of attention.

If you are looking to define this season, then one possible explanation is that it is the Year of the Premium Attacker.  No fewer than five of the Dream Team’s seven starters were priced this preseason at the premium level.  Last season only Mesut Ozil and perhaps Romelu Lukaku could have been considered thusly.

Meanwhile, the cheaper players this season are not sustaining their performances for very long. For example Watford’s Etienne Capoue, Stoke’s Joe Allen and West Brom winger Matt Phillips  have each neatly taken turns every five Gameweeks or so chipping in with unexpected hauls.

Catching any of these would be a success, catching more than one requires plenty of luck and surely must be doing wonders for an overall rank.  This is in marked contrast to last year when Leicester’s Riyad Mahrez was available for peanuts, so too his budget friendly team mate Jamie Vardy and Watford’s Odion Ighalo types.

In short this season there are no “he’s playing like a 10m premium” bargain and no midpriced or budget attacker has emerged as a longterm source of points.

But with so many Premium players doing well over the long haul, any short term plays like a close decision on finding a replacement for a big hitter will have significant consequences. This makes the secret of success, based on class, form and fixtures, even more tricky to fathom.

Just two weeks ago, the question of Harry Kane vs Zlatan Ibrahimovic could have been answered reasonably with either player as the pick: stats favoured the big Swede, form slightly favored Kane, fixtures favored Kane…the result: Ibrahimovic 23-Kane 4.  With captaincy, that is close to a 40 point swing if you went for Kane and gave him the armband, which more than a few managers just might have done.

When the Premiums go cold, they are an absolute polar vortex in your team: Eden Hazard, Kane, Ibrahimovic, Sergio Aguero have all gotten hauls but have been heartbreakers as well, blanking in fixtures that looked ripe for a 20+ point captaincy performance.

Diego Costa stands alone as the warmest, most reliable asset in FPL, with perhaps the performance of Alexis Sanchez getting back to back returns in disappointing results this week elevating him to nearly essential status.

Why is this happening?

Some might point to an allegedly overheated Fantasy Premier League marketplace, though evidence therein is still a bit lacking in my opinion.  I chose instead to focus on the gaps.

Mind the Gap

For the forwards, the range between Jermaine Defoe at 7.8m and Romelu Lukaku at 9.4m is an absolute wasteland: Islam Slimani, Wayne Rooney, and Olivier Giroud are the highest scorers in that range at 47, 40, and 33 points respectively.

That combined output of 120 points is surpassed quite comfortably by uber bench midfielders Darren Fletcher, Adam Forshaw, and Dean Marney (46, 44, 41 respectively).  And yes, I had to look up Forshaw’s first name.

Further up the ranks in midfield, the 6.0-7.0m range has been underwhelming when compared to last season, with only Michail Antonio and James Milner producing decently, though both are outside the top 10 (ranked 13th and 21st for Overall Score, respectively).

The Difficult Search for Value in 2016/17

But I have to return to the overall price differences for each position’s Dream Teamers once again to underscore just how different the two seasons have been:

2015:
Mahrez 6.9 Ozil 9.7 Barkley 7.4 Wijnaldum 6.9 (Ayew 7.1) = 38
Vardy 7.6 Lukaku 9.1 Ighalo 5.9 = 22.6
60.6m total spend

2016:
Sánchez 11.8 Hazard 10.4 Mané 9.4 Walcott 7.8 Eriksen 8.6 48
Costa 10.9 Ibrahimovic 11.3 Defoe 7.8 30
78m total spend

That 17.4m is roughly the difference between Fletcher, Forshaw, Marney and Sanchez, Hazard, Mané, or a full three extra premiums.

Final Thought

It is clear that while 2015/16 was the year of great value, the performances of premium options this year have made it a completely different competition that will need different strategies.

Last year you could have them all. This year that is simply impossible.

43 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    thanks so much for this.

    The difficulties this season laid bare with those pricings...we can't have them all, indeed.

    1. tm245
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 11 months ago

      Cheers for the edits, Jonty, and for turning it around so quickly. Last night's match had little impact on the points (fortunately for the article, unfortunately for many FPL teams), and Ibra is the only riser.

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        8 years, 11 months ago

        No worries. Fascinating read.

  2. Snibal
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Great article! As Jonty said, a difficult season indeed with the pricing. The lack of consistent performing budget/mid-price players make it all the more difficult causing us to chase points for players who go on dry spells after acquiring them and scoring again after selling them. Very difficult to pinpoint which players are worth keeping over their dry spells and which should be cut loose ( my own examples are selling Benteke after a few blanks who scored quite a few goals after that and bringing in Walcott who did nothing since I bought him and then scored again after I sold him)

  3. big_cliff
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Great read, mate. Cheers!

  4. Baines on Toast...
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    very interesting, thanks. what i'm moving towards is trying to find a core that I stick with, that includes a few big hitters, and then rotate the others. I kept getting Haz/Sanchez the wrong way round, so I've resolved to just stick with both, and use my third slot on a big striker. this week, I'm keeping Kane rather than going back to Zlatan, because I'm tired of the endless cycle of chasing points, and I wouldn't want Zlatan long term anyway.

  5. George James
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Interesting stuff. Great article

  6. manbenpig
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    great stuff, cheers

  7. jmcclory123
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    I like the impact the market is having on FPL. It adds a further dimension to the game, no longer can people bide their time until Friday press conferences before making transfers. Hastiness is rewarded with increased team value and securing a premium team but this could equally bite one in the backside, with midweek games posing the threat of injuries.
    As a result, in my ML for example, and from the general feeling on here, more hits are being taken than for example last season. More risk is involved and it's more fun. Those who have accumulated a high team value appear to be reaping the rewards while those who waited (like myself) seem to be struggling to budget our money across our team.
    I think as result of last seasons surplus of budget options, the market of changed purposefully so it would be more difficult to secure the perfect 'titan' teams.

  8. Clump
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Interesting article. Thanks.

  9. Samurai Blue
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Nice article. Thanks.

  10. Konig Luther
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    good article

  11. tm245
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Cheers, for the comments. The two takeaways for me really are the dearth of good forward options and how streaky the Premiums have been.

    I think the changing nature of the PL itself is having a big impact on the Forward position in FPL. So many classified midfielders are really playing as the most advanced players on their team -- just imagine the impact if Sanchez and Firmino were Forwards instead of Midfielders. I've never seen a season with so few options under 9m at Forward, with the typical smaller club talisman becoming an endangered species, it seems. Similarly, a second striker on a big club used to be a viable alternative in previous seasons but those days seem long gone as Rooney, Iheanacho, Batshuyai, and more can attest.

    The other point about hot streaks might not be that different from previous seasons, but it is all the more impactful because of the lack of supporting options in case the Premiums fail. It is worth pointing out Costa again -- he is as sure a bet as there is for returns in FPL. Snachez and Hazard are also noticeable because of the way they seemingly trade hauls back and forth. Unless you can predict when they will hit a purple patch, the safest move might be to go for both. Only twice have they returned double digit hauls on the same gameweek so far. This is obviously a coincidence but one way to protect against correlation when you can't determine causation is to hedge your bets and cover both options.

    1. Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 11 months ago

      Excellent article TM. Really spot on.
      It's funny how so many of us (myself included) have contorted our squads to get 'essential' premium strikers/midfielders only to be trolled by them.
      Lately I have gone with Alonso and Walker and a couple of good cheaper options Holebas and McAuley. Alongside Pickford and Heaton they are, per player, outscoring my front 7 (Sanchez Hazard, Theo, Siggy, Costa, Kane and er Anichibe)
      I agree with Ruth a solid 242 works well, picking up points all over the pitch.
      I won't be in any rush to get Kun in when he is back.

  12. TheRationalOne
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    fantastic article! one of the best i have come across on this site.

  13. Mikeharbrw
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Superb read- when someone questions why I value team value so much (especially this year) I will point them to this article

    1. Ruth_NZ
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 11 months ago

      Well, I guess it's nice to have a putative justification for a bias.

      The fact is that TV is not that big of a deal. The real gap between a good manager that has focused on TV and one that has borne it in mind but not been driven by it is unlikely to be more than 2.0m even at the end of the season. That can be bridged by one player selection.

      If the article points to anything it is that 4-4-2 or 4-3-3 may be more viable structures than 3-4-3 or 3-5-2 in the current price/performance landscape. When the attackers you really want are all expensive then you can make that more manageable by only having 6 of them rather than 7. And instead of using compromise solutions (or so many) in attack, you use the predictability of the premium defenders (who are nevertheless much cheaper) to bridge the gap.

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        8 years, 11 months ago

        I have started to think that too. Two Chelsea defenders for example and walker plus a cheap defender has done really well for those that have that four man set up recently.

        I definitely need to look at something like this with my rank.

      2. tm245
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 11 months ago

        Interesting idea about how value might be giving us the option to play more fluidly with our team structure. If those 5.5-6.5m defs provide as many points as the cheapet forwards, for example, that leaves more money to spend on Premium attackers.

        So perhaps a 3-3-3 with the last four outfield spots taken up by cheap rotating defs and mids?

        1. J0E
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 16 Years
          8 years, 11 months ago

          I've focused my team on four big name players Haz, Sanchez, Kane and Costa in recent weeks and it has got me nowhere.

          Time to sacrifice one of those three and use the cash to spread the move.

          If I;d have gone for the likes of Eriksen, Walker, Azpiliceuta, Negredo and Lallana I'd have done much better.

          More good players is needed to catch their hauls. Focusing on my four clearly doesn't work this season.

          1. tm245
            • 14 Years
            8 years, 11 months ago

            For me it is definitely one expensive forward and one midpriced in a 352. There are so many more productive midfielders than forwards so far this season.

        2. Ruth_NZ
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 11 months ago

          Yes, exactly that.

          The unseen advantage of 4-3-3 and 4-4-2 is the ability to use a bench attacker as a rotation player.

          For example if you have a premium 2-4-2 as the core (as I currently do). You then have 3 rotation defenders plus a rotation mid (maybe you play slightly more for a Wanyama rather than a Fletcher) and a rotation forward (Anichebe is the best).

          You must then play any 2 of those 5 rotators every week with the only proviso that one must be a defender. Other than that you play for fixtures and will be 4-4-2 one week, 3-4-3 the next, 3-5-2 the next. The 4-4-2 structure allows this because your core isn't maxed out on strikers or midfielders. It is much more flexible.

          But at the same time your 5 rotators are all around 4.5m or so and the bench in any week therefore still has budgetary efficiency. Structure is all about squeezing the maximum efficiency from your budget after all. Last season 3-4-3 was optimal. This season I don't think it is.

  14. FantaCity
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Interesting that Sergio Aguero is absent from both dreamteams .... proof that he really is not worth the high price

    1. GreenWindmill
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 11 months ago

      True, but only if you're setting up a dead team - if you're going to actively manage your team and transfer him in/out when injuries/suspensions hit, consider captaincy, etc. then it's way more complex...

      1. tm245
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 11 months ago

        Agree with this very much. His captaincy potential also makes for an important consideration if you can nail him at the right time.

  15. HVT
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Genius of an article!
    Thanks TM, real interesting read that's snappy and highly informative.

    Your analysis makes for compelling reading and a pointer as to why so many are struggling this year and how valuable TV is this season.

    1. tm245
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 11 months ago

      Cheers, HVT. Will be interesting to see if this trens continues in the second half of the season. If so, cash will be critical to safeguard against the inconsistencies we've been seeing so far.

  16. Urchin
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    The guy who led my ML till almost January last season simply played 'auto pick' from gw1... With mahrez ighalo vardy doing so well it always worked for him.. Until Kane Hazzard and Sanchez exploded towards end for brief periods and lukaku trolled... Also he didn't use any chips and lost his way towards end due to lack of time
    All he did otherwise to January was to drop an United or suspended player based on flags and click auto pick....

    1. Urchin
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 11 months ago

      *injured or suspended player

  17. tisza
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    good article.

    a couple of things
    I remember Barkley being much like some of the big hitters - every now and again a huge haul and not much in between.
    Wijnaldum could only seem to score in home games.
    Ozil was good because he was consistent - don't remember him having too many hauls. No-one really replicating that in midfield this year.
    Mahrez & Vardy were one-offs - and again Vardy was very much a consistent scorer rather than having too many hauls.

    This time last year we were about to add another cheap option to the mix - Alli.

    No chance of getting the same data from 2104/15?
    Did you do the same thing for the 2nd half of the season? Players like Kane and Sanchez started kicking in then.

  18. TorresMagic™
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Best dead team

    https://fantasy.premierleague.com/a/team/2826453/event/17

    6 out of 15 picked including a benched Heaton.

  19. Bezzer
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Best read on here for a while and making me rethink about not beating myself up about trying to fit in to many heavy hitters. That final sentence I must remember.

    1. white heart pain
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 11 months ago

      +1

  20. SC not pearls before swine
    • 15 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Good stuff. Leicester giving premium options with expected relegation contender prices really spoiled us. Although to be honest, I kept expecting the other shoe to drop and went far too long without Mahrez/Vardy. I think I had a Fuchs/Huth/Simpson treble for quite a while that did some work though.

    I think Walcott is the one true bargain pick. If he continues to start every week he's worth 10 million.

  21. tm245
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Cheers again for the posts, some great comments with plenty to think about.

    A few responses:

    1) TorresMagic's post made me realize how slowly things have been changing so far: if an average FFS manager could nail even a third of the midseason Dream Team with preseason original picks in August, then patience is probably the most important skill for the 2016/17 season so far. I think many on here would have strongly considered Sanchez Hazard Costa Ibrahimovic from the start, for example, and a Chelsea defender wouldn't have been too much of a stretch. If you kept the faith in the five of them and quickly realized that Costa could be an autocaptain, the other 10 players could be the ones to rotate, transfer, chase bandwagons, and have fun with.

    2) I wish I could get the data for previous seasons, but have no idea how to find it. The second halves would also be really interesting to look at. I remember an article on FFS from years ago that did something similar -- it looked at who the midyear top performers were and then the end of season top performers to see who had maintained their form. Last season is a great example:

    -- Mahrez petered out pretty significantly from his record pace, especially as Leicester bolted the door and the Tinkerman went for the title through a series of 1-0 tactical master classes.
    -- Firmino was insane in calendar year 2016 before December; his second half of last season was phenomenal.

    3) Ruth NZ's tactical suggestion above merits further discussion IMO. If you think about how hard it is to amass a Dream Team starting 11 by using cheap bench fodder for your other four spots:
    Heaton 4.8 (4.5)
    Azpilicueta 6.4 Walker 6.2 Daniels 5.1 (4.5/4.5)
    Sánchez 11.8 Hazard 10.4 Mané 9.4 Walcott 7.8 (4.5)
    Costa 10.9 Ibrahimovic 11.3 Defoe 7.8
    still costs 109.9, then figuring out VORP this season is absolutely crucial.

    All of this is to say that the work for this article and the above comments gave me a clearer picture of where we have been so far, but I still am unclear where we are going.

  22. Your Mum's Athletic
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Fantastic article, top stuff!

  23. The Orienteer - find me in …
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Thanks for this, great stuff - helps me see the wood from the trees!

  24. marquinhos
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    Excellent article
    10/10

  25. Gnu
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    8 years, 11 months ago

    A great & interesting read TM.

    For me this sums up why this season has been more testing and for many frustrating - there are clearly choices to be made not only choice of players but the timing of owning these players more key.
    It opens up the options not only of player choices but in formation and again it's not about picking a formation and sticking rigidly to it but being flexible and willing to change.
    The big chips (BB? & TC) and 2nd WC are going to key in end of season rank imo.
    An interesting second half of the season awaits.