Digest

Brighton’s Double Gameweek 34 opens up new Fantasy options

Our regular analysis of a player, team and discussion point that attracted our interest in the previous weekend’s matches (aka The Digest) returns.

As one of only two sides who had a Premier League fixture in Blank Gameweek 31 and who have a double-header in Gameweek 32, we turn our attention to Chelsea for our player and team analysis.

We also cast our eyes a little further forward following Tuesday’s announcement that Brighton and Cardiff will have a Double Gameweek 34 and ponder a slightly different chip strategy.

The Player – Eden Hazard

While much attention has been directed towards the failings of Mohamed Salah (£13.3m) as a Fantasy asset over the last few months, Eden Hazard (£10.9m) has been arguably more underwhelming for a more sustained period of time.

Whisper it quietly but the Belgian winger has only three goals (one of which came from the penalty spot) and two assists in his last 11 Premier League starts, averaging 4.64 FPL points per match over that time and blanking in seven of those fixtures.

The influence of Alvaro Morata and Olivier Giroud (£7.7m) on Hazard was a much-discussed topic earlier in the season but the arrival of Gonzalo Higuain (£9.6m) in January was initially seen as a positive, with those two players seemingly striking up a good understanding from the off.

The Argentinean’s signing has done little to stop the rot in Hazard’s underlying stats, however.

From Gameweek 20 onwards, Hazard’s rate of expected goals is half of what it was in the first 19 matches of the season.

While Hazard’s rate of penalty box touches and shots in the opposition area have remained around the same before and after Gameweek 19, the Belgian’s average number of big chances has plummeted from 0.7 to 0.2 per match in the second half of the season.

There is even more of a drop-off in Hazard’s big chance creation.

Having been the supplier of 13 clear-cut opportunities in the first 17 Gameweeks of the season, the Belgium international hasn’t carved out a single big chance in his subsequent 13 appearances.

Sarri’s inflexibility when it comes to his team’s shape and system has perhaps made it easier for other clubs to negate Hazard’s influence if they know exactly how Chelsea will line up.

There remains the question over just how committed to the Chelsea cause Hazard is, too, with a summer move to Real Madrid potentially in the offing.

The quality of Chelsea’s next three opponents perhaps makes it more difficult to overlook Hazard over the next two Gameweeks: the Belgian racked up double-digit hauls against Brighton and Cardiff earlier this season.

The limitations of those two clubs and West Ham (more of which in the section below) means that, even in third gear, Hazard could still rack up a tidy score despite our misgivings.

Unless he seriously bucks his downward trend in the next three matches, however, Hazard looks like a dispensable premium asset from Gameweek 34 onwards.

The Team – Chelsea

With Chelsea having a Double Gameweek 32 as well as a fixture in Blank Gameweek 33, many Fantasy managers will be pondering on which players in Maurizio Sarri’s side are worthy of consideration over the coming month.

The Blues’ Jekyll-and-Hyde display at Goodison Park was the chief focus of our Scout Notes article earlier this week and it is this unreliability that is so off-putting, especially when many of their assets cost a lot of money to buy.

Of particular concern is their attack.

When clubs are filtered by their last six matches, Chelsea rank a respectable third for overall attempts and shots in the box and joint-fifth for efforts on target.

However, it’s the quality of the Blues’ opportunities that is worrisome: only Everton have registered fewer “big chances” than Sarri’s troops over their last six Premier League games.

Whilst “big chances” are a somewhat arbitrary yardstick, the fact that Manchester City have recorded more than three times as many gilt-edged opportunities as Chelsea in that time says a lot.

Hazard’s own personal drop-off in numbers (see above) are, of course, intrinsically linked to the Blues’ overall woes as a team.

It is away from home that Chelsea have really struggled.

Sarri’s troops are actually unbeaten in the league at Stamford Bridge in 2019 but have lost four of their last five matches on the road.

Again, big chances are the issue as the Blues fare well for other attacking KPIs (such as shots in the box) over their last six away games.

Not that Chelsea have been turning on the style at home, either: they rank only joint-tenth for big chances and shots in the box over the last six at Stamford Bridge.

There is more of a home/away divide when it comes to defensive statistics.

So secure on their own patch, Chelsea rank first for fewest shots in the box, efforts on target and big chances conceded over their last six home fixtures.

Only three teams have allowed more big chances than Sarri’s side over their last half-dozen league matches on the road, however.

The Blues haven’t kept an away clean sheet in 2019.

Looking ahead to Gameweeks 32 and 33, it is Chelsea’s opposition – rather than the west London side themselves – that fills us with optimism.

Home matches against Brighton and West Ham are obvious sources of attraction for those considering Chelsea defenders, while the Hammers are even more woeful than Sarri’s side on their travels: Manuel Pellegrini’s outfit have allowed the highest number of big chances of any top-flight club over their last six away matches.

The trip to Cardiff gives the Blues the perfect chance to remedy their recent away record, too: Warnock’s side have lost all eight of their meetings with “big six” clubs this season (including the reverse fixture at Stamford Bridge, 4-1), conceding 27 goals in the process.

The calibre of Chelsea’s opposition is probably reason alone to invest in their Fantasy assets over the next two Gameweeks – which is a good job, as the Blues’ hit-and-miss players are not making a convincing case of their own.

The Talking Point – Double Gameweek 34

The Premier League’s much-anticipated fixture announcement on Tuesday brought us confirmation of the largely expected line-up for Double Gameweeks 32 and 35.

We also knew that Brighton and Hove Albion would have a third Double Gameweek thrown in there too but, until a few “in the know” accounts leaked the news shortly beforehand, we didn’t really have many clues as to which Gameweek the Seagulls’ match against Cardiff City would be tagged on to.

The revelation that Brighton (and Neil Warnock’s side) will now have a Double Gameweek 34 prompted discussion about a possible new chip strategy on both this site and beyond:

As mentioned in the comments above, this “new” strategy would be particularly of interest to those who still have their Triple Captain chip available and especially to those who have their other chips still left to go with it.

Gauging by the comments on Fantasy Football Scout and on social media, the following strategies have become popular as we approach the blank and doubles ahead:

FH32, WC34, BB35
WC32, FH33, BB35

What those strategies had in common was that a Triple Captain chip could then be used on a player in a single Gameweek (Mohamed Salah at home to Huddersfield in Gameweek 36, for example) or on a Brighton player if their match against Cardiff was rearranged between Gameweeks 36 and 38.

Now that the Seagulls and Bluebirds are scheduled to meet in Double Gameweek 34, only the second of the two above strategies allows for a triple captaincy of a Brighton player.

First, the advantages.

The most obvious upside to deploying the Triple Captain chip on, say, Glenn Murray (£6.3m) or Shane Duffy (£4.7m) is that Fantasy managers get two bites of the cherry in Gameweek 34. Should our Brighton assets fail in their first fixture, they then go again three days later.

Another positive is that Brighton are at home in both fixtures and the Seagulls have traditionally been a stronger proposition on home turf than they have on the road.

Chris Hughton’s side have registered twice as many points at the Amex as they have on their travels in 2018/19 and conceded 12 fewer goals.

Five of their six clean sheets this season have been at home.

Goalscoring-wise, they don’t particularly impress: only Crystal Palace and Huddersfield Town have hit the back of the net on fewer occasions on their own turf in 2018/19.

It’s not just the fact that Hughton’s troops are on home soil, it’s that they face Cardiff and Bournemouth – two of the five leakiest defences in the top flight this season – at the Amex.

The Bluebirds have scored fewer away goals than all other Premier League teams and both they and Eddie Howe’s side sit in the bottom five for their overall record on the road.

Pooodle outlines some of the wider advantages for venturing down the “Wildcard in 32” approach, from price rises to possible benefits in Gameweek 33, too.

And now, the disadvantages.

Quite simply, which Brighton asset would you use this chip on?

It remains to be seen if Pascal Gross (£6.7m) can recover from a hamstring problem over the next three weeks or so, while Hughton has five fit players who have been used in the wide midfield areas this season – so rotation is a distinct possibility on the flanks.

While Murray has started every league match in 2019, Florin Andone (£5.0m) was meant to line up at Palace in Gameweek 30 before a groin injury struck in the warm-up and the Romanian striker had been suspended in Gameweeks 26 and 28.

When Brighton last encountered fixture congestion in December, Murray and Andone alternated their starts from Gameweeks 15-21.

Duffy, Lewis Dunk (£4.4m) and Mathew Ryan (£4.4m) offer security of starts, at least, and in Dunk and (especially) Duffy’s case their attacking threat is very appealing.

Using a Triple Captain chip on a defender, and a Brighton one at that, is bound not to sit well with many Fantasy managers, though.

The “swords and shields” analogy is one way of looking at it: for those Fantasy managers looking for a fairly high-risk differential strategy to climb the ranks, a Brighton Triple Captain would seem very much a “sword”.

For the rest of us dullards, pragmatists and shield-wielders, it could well be a maverick move too far.

Palace Ash and Forza, meanwhile, outline some of the other pitfalls of using a Wildcard in Gameweek 32 in the images above.

 

1,641 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Peter Ouch
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    TC a Brighton player?
    No thanks

    1. Sharkytect
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      The article says people are consiering that, and yet the only quotes are people arguing against it.

    2. Pukki Party
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      I think that gameweek isn't worth TC. On the other hand BB34 looks good imo, as you can get a bench out of Cardiff Brighton players on WC32, and use TC35 on Jimenez Auba or Salah.

      1. The 5% Team
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 10 days ago

        TC Kane vs Huddersfield in 34 is an option

  2. Whats the Huth
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Kepa
    Luiz. Laporte. Lindelof
    Sterling. Pogba. Son. Hazard.
    Aguero. Rashford. Deeney.

    0.1 ITB

    Thoughts on this FH?

    1. milanista10
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      Good team mate (although personally I prefer 3 City attackers). Only worry would be Deeney I'd say but if you are not concerned much with rotation then you are good to go.

    2. Amey
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      Nice
      Deeney is rotation prone though.
      I prefer Duffy + Batsman for your Lindelof + Deeney

  3. Sharkytect
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Will brighton have a double gameweek in gw35 as well as 34?

    1. Amey
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      Yep
      Gw 34 looks especially cool.
      2 home games

  4. milanista10
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    A) Lindelof & Kepa
    B) Luiz & Foster

    A or B lads?

    1. Sharkytect
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      A

  5. Slitherene
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    FH 32. Finally down to 2 options!

    A) Kepa + Luiz + Batshuayi

    OR

    B) Foster + Azpilicueta + Zaha

    1. Sharkytect
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      B

    2. JELLYFISH
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      A

    3. Amey
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      A

    4. Lucky Z
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      A

  6. Lucky Z
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    For those with WC in 34 and BB in 35 trippling up for 34 on Brighton (Ryan Duffy Murray) and then Murray => Deeney for FT in 35. What do you think.

    1. Amey
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      Yeah
      Murray for gw 34 & Jimenez IN for gw 35.
      I don't have Jimenez in the team so ....
      I prefer Deulofeu instead of Deeney too.

    2. tucaoneo
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      Murray is so old. Can't trust him to start 2 games in 34.

      1. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 10 days ago

        Have to agree with this... its a bad sign when a player is older than the Gameweek number they're playing in when it gets to the last few weeks

        1. Amey
          • 5 Years
          5 years, 10 days ago

          😀

  7. JELLYFISH
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    All these teams with Lindelof picks. Aren’t you worried about the baby on the way?

    1. Big boy Bowen
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      Can't imagine the baby will play instead of him

      1. Amey
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 10 days ago

        DIFFERENTIAL !

      2. Jam0sh
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 10 days ago

        😀

  8. Big boy Bowen
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Morning guys

    What would you do here with 1FT and no FH/WC?

    Boruc
    Doherty* | Peltier* | TAA
    Pogba* | Son* | Camarasa* | Salah | Mane
    Kane* | Aguero*

    Speroni | Bednarek | Bennett | Kamara

    0ITB, 1FT

    *Double Gameweek

    Thanks

    1. Follyfarmer
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      Sterling in for salah

      1. Big boy Bowen
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 10 days ago

        Sounds the obvious move but I need players for 33 too

    2. Amey
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      Salah + Kamara >> Hazard + Zaha/Batsman (-4)

      2 gw 33 players for 1
      &
      2 dgw's player's for out of form salah+ out of fpl kamara

      1. Big boy Bowen
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 10 days ago

        Thank you, very similar to my thoughts below.
        Which means it boils down to Bats or Triple Murray (though no GW33).
        (Cant afford Zaha)

        1. Big boy Bowen
          • 7 Years
          5 years, 10 days ago

          Having said that, it's an easy move in 34 to do Bats to Murray (permitting price changes)

        2. Amey
          • 5 Years
          5 years, 10 days ago

          Like Bats though.
          Can swap him to Murray/Jimenez easily in gw 34/35
          As you don't have WC/FH I won't go full throttle attack wise by binning Mane.

          Can consider selling Son for Sterling though
          But i prefer selling Kamara as he's a dead spot in your team.

          1. Big boy Bowen
            • 7 Years
            5 years, 10 days ago

            Thanks for your help I think you're spot on. I can have 7 players for 33 too with one transfer then.

            1. Amey
              • 5 Years
              5 years, 10 days ago

              Yep
              GL 🙂

    3. Big boy Bowen
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      I'm thinking 1 of 2 moves:

      1) Salah & Mane to Hazard & Sterling
      2) Salah & Kamara to Hazard & Murray

      Option 2 effectively gives me an extra player for GW33 (Mane)
      Just means no Sterling

  9. Ajax Hamsterdam
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Could bb in 34 with 3 Brighton and camarasa and Peltier work ?

    1. Pukki Party
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      Yes

  10. ZeBestee
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    If Lukaku is passed fit, who is the better option out of the 2:

    1) Lukaku
    2) Kane

    1. Amey
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      1

      1. ZeBestee
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 10 days ago

        Lukaku is on form, I think if fit I will go with him. Would have to loose Sterling/Alli though. If Sterling gets 180 min, then might as well sacrifice him. I think 2/3 players will disappoint and getting it correct is the challenge.

        1. Amey
          • 5 Years
          5 years, 10 days ago

          Absolutely.
          Sterling + Kun + Lukaku + Hazard are main player's for me this gw. ( My team's perspective )

    2. fenixri
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      Kane too much value, I dont trust Spurs and their fixtures are not that good. Personally I have Son but thinking to drop him too.

    3. The Overthinker
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      He'll be fit to play against Watford

      1. Amey
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 10 days ago

        Nice that you're not "Overthinking"
        😉

        1. The Overthinker
          • 7 Years
          5 years, 10 days ago

          There's nothing to overthink here. I want him back so that we win.

          1. Amey
            • 5 Years
            5 years, 10 days ago

            🙂

  11. Kun Tozser
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Lukaku + Milivojevic

    Or

    Rashford + Sane

    FH

    1. Ajax Hamsterdam
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      I feel sane is too risky now

    2. Lucky Z
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      I would not consider Sane

    3. Pukki Party
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      B

  12. fenixri
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    All FH teams looks the same. Those who wont FH could profit large with other assets like Liverpool

    1. Amey
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      Against Spurs ??
      Nahh.
      Won't be a thrashing.
      Worst case scenario is Robbo+taa getting one attacking return + CS ( 10+ )

    2. Now I'm Panicking
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      Possibly, but I would rather have 2 lottery tickets than one.

      1. n14mul
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 10 days ago

        This

    3. ⚔★Vibudh★⚔
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      Not Liverpool but maybe Vardy at home to Bournemouth

  13. The Tinkerman
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Kane, or no Kane?

    Ederson
    Luiz, Schlupp, Boly, WB
    Pogba, Sterling, Hazard, Townsend
    Aguero, Kane

    Ederson
    Azpi, Lindelof, Schlupp, WB
    Pogba, Sterling, Hazard
    Aguero, Lukaku, Zaha

    1. The Tinkerman
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      I guess that becomes:

      A) Luiz, Boly, Townsend, Kane
      B) Azpi, Lindelof, Zaha, Lukaku

      1. Robson-Canoe
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 10 days ago

        Tough but I'd say I slightly prefer B

    2. tucaoneo
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      I think given your TV Kane is a bit of a stretch.

  14. Robson-Canoe
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Hey guys, my current team (no FH) looks like this:

    Ryan
    Robertson Pereira AWB
    Salah Pogba Sterling Mané
    Jimenez Higuain Rashford

    Would you do Salah + Higuain > Hazard + Agüero(TC) (-4)?

  15. ZeBestee
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Which DGW player/s do you think will disappoint his owners the most ?

    1) Hazard
    2) Sterling
    3) Aguero
    4) Kane
    5) Kepa
    6) Pogba

    1. Robson-Canoe
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      4

    2. Now I'm Panicking
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      All of them

      1. ZeBestee
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 10 days ago

        Whom you going with? Salah?

        1. Now I'm Panicking
          • 9 Years
          5 years, 10 days ago

          No, just setting myself up for inevitable disappointment 🙂

    3. Amey
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      4

    4. ⚔★Vibudh★⚔
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      4

    5. The Overthinker
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      Love how people are doubting 4 😀

      These are the same people.who 'believed' in Salah in BGW31

    6. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      4 has two horrible fixtures, a horrible price tag, a team in horrible form...

      So i can see why folks would say 4

  16. Tomerick
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    A) Rashford and Higuain

    B) Lukaku and Batshuayi

    Considering I already have Pogba and Hazard.

    1. n14mul
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      C. Currently flirting with bats and hig

    2. The Pesci challenge
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      A

  17. cylus11 ( Manager) - Russia…
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Why everyone dumping Jiminez. He has been the man in form.
    Looks like it will back fire for them

    1. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      International duty means he returns quite late, FA Cup semi means he may play just one game in the double game week

    2. Now I'm Panicking
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      Haven't had him all season

      1. Amey
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 10 days ago

        Same here
        I thought I'd get him in FH 32 team but rotation risk means he'd have to wait till 35 😛

        1. Now I'm Panicking
          • 9 Years
          5 years, 10 days ago

          Yeah - think he is definitely being seen as a better prospect than he is this week as people are being blinded by the value they have tied up in him.

          1. Amey
            • 5 Years
            5 years, 10 days ago

            Agreed.

    3. Maximus Bonimus Pointimus
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      There is a lot of misinformed group-think unfortunately when it comes to Jiminez - you can basically split opinion on his DGW32 prospects into 4 categories:

      A) Will be rotated and won't score well relative to other strikers
      B) Will be rotated and will score well relative to other strikers
      C) Won't be rotated and won't score well relative to other strikers
      D) Won't be rotated and will score well relative to other strikers

      It's impossible to say which category will eventually be ''correct'' - but it is possible to say the available evidence does not support category A or B... (i.e. Jiminez has not been rotated season to date, he's started 28 or 29 games this season in the league, wolves have never rotated before or after the FA cup so far this season, more prize money for 7th in the league vs. 8th or lower or vs. a losing FA Cup Final appearance, guaranteed european position for 7th, no euro spot for losing FA Cup finalist, FA Cup final opposition likely to be Man City, etc etc - this has all been done to death)

      And his performances season to date also suggest Category C is less likely than category D given where he stands in the points rankings and the fact that he has two fixtures

      So overall - a lot of misinformed group think - that may inadvertently end up getting a good result in avoiding a player who doesn't score a lot of points in the GW - but is ultimately not supported by the available evidence

  18. The 5% Team
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Pick one:

    A. Patricio, Doherty and D.Silva
    B. Patricio, Laporte and Alli (-4)

    1. Robson-Canoe
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      A

    2. ⚔★Vibudh★⚔
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      A

      1. The 5% Team
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 10 days ago

        thnx. Even though most of us here agree that Wolves will rotate players, so Doherty might only play one match?

    3. tucaoneo
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      Why Patricio? Nuno has benched him before to prepare the 2nd goalie for the cup. Wouldn't be surprised he does it again. Even if he starts he doesn't do CS.

      1. The 5% Team
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 10 days ago

        yeah, but not an a FH. So to take a -4 to change goalie is not something I want to do.

        1. tucaoneo
          • 5 Years
          5 years, 10 days ago

          Oh my bad. I actually think Laporte can erase the -4 for you but not sure about Alli.

          1. The 5% Team
            • 5 Years
            5 years, 10 days ago

            yeah, keep switching between the options. Alli would be a one week punt, will be getting Son back on WC later.

  19. balint84
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Are Steling & Hazard essentials now? (don't have Kun or Kepa either)

  20. n14mul
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Morning all,

    Just a thought regarding the upcoming DGW.

    What are everyone's thoughts on formation??

    More defence (532, 433) or more attack (343).

    I currently leaning towards more attack with the fruits more potential considering there has not been that many clean sheets recently.

    Yes I get city and Chelsea have favourable games but surely city forwards are worth more of a gamble than their defence??

    Thoughts please.

    1. Robson-Canoe
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      I'd always go for the more attacking formation, it's the exciting way to play the game. If you play 532, you won't enjoy watching the matches.

      1. n14mul
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 10 days ago

        Agree.

        I just see alot of RMT have the same template of 443 using ederson in goal or laporte.

        Surely taking a gamble on either Silva has to worth a risk to help people in their ML.

    2. The Overthinker
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      I am going with 433 .

      Have used back 4 the most since last year . Love playing with 4 def.

      1. n14mul
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 10 days ago

        Which 4

        1. The Overthinker
          • 7 Years
          5 years, 10 days ago

          Luiz awb Lindelof laporte/rudiger (depends if I go with kepa or ederson)

  21. ⚔★Vibudh★⚔
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Which of these on FH? (Have Hazard and Kepa)
    A) Higuain, Lindelof, Deulofeu
    B)Son, Luiz,Deeney

    1. Robson-Canoe
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      A for me

  22. New Article
  23. balint84
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    A)
    Robbo-AWB-Luiz-Valery-Ogbonna
    Sterling-Hazard-Pogba-Moutinho-Fraser
    Kane-Jiminez-Grant

    or

    B)
    Robbo-AWB-Lindelöf-Valery-Dunk
    Hazard-Milivokevic-Pogba-Maddison-Fraser
    Kane-Agüero-Kamara

  24. Danstoke82
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Morning all, how’s this looking so far for a FH32 team?

    Ederson
    Azpilicueta Wan Bissaka Lindelof
    Sterling Hazard Pogba Deulofeu
    Aguero Kane Batshuayi

    Subs; Speroni Hudson-Odoi Bednarek Simpson

    £0.1ITB

    Any changes required? Thanks in advance!

  25. Daghe Munegu
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Any good?

    DDG
    Schlupp Luiz Azpi
    Hazard Sterling Pogba Bilva
    Kun Rashford Batshuayi

  26. KUN_DE_BRU_YNE
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Rashford Vs Zaha ??

  27. HollywoodXI
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    I can’t decide on which of these two FH teams I should run with (both with rubbish benches):

    (A) Guiata / Schlupp / Luiz / Laporte / Lindelof / Sterling / Hazard / Pogba / Rashford / Kane / Aguero

    (B) Kepa / Luiz / Laporte / Lindelof / Sterling / Hazard / Pogba / Eriksen / Rashford / Zaha / Aguero

    Basically a choice between Kane and palace defensive double up or Eriksen, Zaha and double Chelsea defence.

    I’d really appreciate your views!

  28. Punty
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Anyone looked at Pogbas stats in games after he has flirted with other teams during international break?

  29. Ronnies
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    Thoughts on this FH team for GW 32

    ryan
    luiz - lindelof - schlupp
    hazard - sterling - pogba - bsilva
    aguero - lukaku - zaha/bats

    Obv hoping lukaku is passed fit.

    Appreciate yer thought guys.
    Thanks.

  30. Whiffy McBiffy
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 10 days ago

    De Gea*
    Trent David Luiz* Bednarek Daniels Rice
    Hazard*(TC) Pogba* Sterling (VTC)*
    Rashford* Barnes Higuain*

    Boruc Barnes Westwood Schneiderlin

    Got 4.3 in the bank, planning on transferring Son in for Westwood ahead of GW34 then making a double swoop for a dirt cheap defender on a double (Valery for Trent?) and a striker on a double for Barnes (thinking Jimenez if Wolves lose the semi to Watford) Thoughts please.

    1. Whiffy McBiffy
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 10 days ago

      My bad, * indicates a DGW