Community

Eliteserien GW7 – O Captain! my Captain!

“O Captain! my Captain! our fearful trip is done,

The ship has weather’d every rack, the prize we sought is won,

The port is near, the bells I hear, the people all exulting,

While follow eyes the steady keel, the vessel grim and daring;

How many times have you felt like this? Another week flies by, another Captain delivers you that sought-after prize of double points and they were already juicy enough to begin with. Suddenly an ‘alright’ gameweek turns into great one; red arrows shaking off their hue to reveal beautiful green undertones that thrust you up the rankings. Your Captain has steered the ship, yet again away from disaster, away from the rocks that threaten shipwrecking and into safe, open waters. There’s even a crowd of well-wishers gathering along the shoreline to cheer you on, recognising your valiant efforts and success.

But it’s not like that for everyone. Some of us have shipwrecked so many times we’re at the point of almost giving up and making do with a raft made out of flotsam and driftwood…

But O heart! heart! heart!

  O the bleeding drops of red,

    Where on the deck my Captain lies,

           Fallen cold and dead.”

Ah yes, that’s more like it. Walt Whitman’s poignant allegory about the death of Abraham Lincoln at the end of the American Civil War is of course beyond reproach, but it seems awfully relevant within the world of Fantasy Football.

All of my Captains to this point have brought me nothing but frustration. Alas, their bodies are too big to simply sweep under the carpet, or hide in the airing cupboard – they must be disposed of properly. And the only way I can do that is to understand why I chose them in the first place, then see what other options I had and how they compared. That’s exactly what I’ve done, and it’s exactly the point of this article.

I will, week by week, discuss my Captaincy picks, how they went wrong, what else I could’ve (should’ve done) and compare those outcomes. The aim of this analysis is not only to see how my points totals have been affected (how many points I’ve lost) it’s also to look at the logic behind those choices. I want to know if I made fundamentally horrendous choices or whether it’s nothing more than ‘Hindsight 101’ and it’s only become obvious now after the fact. (Home teams will be capitalised).

GAMEWEEK 1 CAPTAIN:

Leke James (12.0m) [molde fk vs AALESUNDS FK]

Before the season started I had it in my head that Torgeir Borven (11.3m) would continue his brilliant form into 2020. Then I heard rumours of his move to Rosenborg and the prospect of him taking the league by storm, or even being played by Odd seemed to diminish along with the thought of choosing him in my team. First mistake.

The three best forwards in the league last season – by quite some distance – were James, Borven and Ohikhuaeme Omoijuanfo (10.9m). Naturally as Borven was out of the picture it boiled down to who do I pick between James and Ohi. I sided with James as he was favourite to start and thus he was shifted into my team and duly captained.

Molde were huge favourites to win and likely to score multiple goals. James seemed like a perfectly sound choice for Gameweek 1 captaincy. He repaid with me a goal but also a red card after being booked twice. The fact that Borven scored a 93rd minute penalty for Odd in their game was the proverbial salt in the wound.

• GW1 Captain Score: 3pts

• Best GW1 Captain Score: 9pts (Niklas Sandberg, 7.6m)

• Points Lost: 6pts

Although I had better options in my team, I cannot fault the logic in choosing one of the most talented forwards in the league against a newly promoted side. This one goes down to horrible misfortune and shouldn’t be rued. To dwell or not to dwell? Decidedly not. (Sound Logic, Poor Points)

GAMEWEEK 2 CAPTAIN:

• Lars Jorgen Salvesen (8.5m) [STROMSGODSET TOPPFOTBAL vs odd bk]

Despite Bodo/Glimt finishing second to Molde last season, I avoided them completely as they suffered quite a few losses of their best players to bigger teams eager to snap up potential bargains. This is also a club that has only been in the top flight of Norwegian football five out of the last ten seasons, and before last season their highest finish was 9th. It was surely a fluke and it won’t happen again – look elsewhere. Mistake number 2.

I could have jumped from James to Borven and it would’ve have been perfectly fine to do so as he scored against Sandefjord. I chose not to as Odd lost that game – at home – and faced a much stronger side in Stromsgodset. I saw a home win and many goals, thus Salvesen not only walked into my team, but he was also given the ‘Kapteinens armbånd’ without much deliberation whatsoever. (Translation courtesy of Google.com).

• GW2 Captain Score: 1pt

• Best GW2 Captain Score: 7pts (Niklas Sandberg)

• Points Lost: 6pts

Salvesen got a beastly 10pts against IK Start the week before, only to return almost empty-handed the following game. I had Sandberg as my vice-captain on the basis that pretty much every other player in my team had a tough game. I wasn’t expecting points to flow and saw him as a good back up as he was on penalty duty, scored the previous week and I viewed Bodo/Glimt as a team most sides would feel they could score one or two against.

You can see for yourself just how well that turned out. I’m not too sure I can say this was the best decision. I was perhaps too influenced by Salvesen’s 10pts haul against Start in making the move to bring him in and captain him. There were slim-pickings elsewhere and even though Sandberg scored well, I would’ve captained whoever I brought in as my forward over him. I remain ambivalent about this one. (Iffy Logic, Poor Points)

GAMEWEEK 3 CAPTAIN:

• Ohikhuaeme Omoijuanfo [IK START vs molde fk]

I was one of the few to Wildcard at this point, influenced mainly by the concern of heading into Gameweek 3 with potentially as few as 9 starting players and an ineffective bench. The decision to overhaul completely is up for debate, but overall I was happy to commit to using such a chip so early on as it would be the springboard from which I would start my season.

With 81pts won in ‘Runde 3’ (RD Rank 2,973) you’d think I’d be happy. Ohi was always seen as the one-week salve in this situation, taking full advantage of yet again another easy fixture in which one of the best players in the league could wreak havoc. Sigh. Molde won the game 3-2 with a rather fortuitous last-minute goal by rampaging centre-back Stian Gregersen (5.2m). The two other goals were also scored by defenders. Bigger sigh. If I was told by a time-traveller that Molde would score 3 goals in that game, it would’ve resulted in the calmest, most assured captaincy pick in the history of my ESN playing career. Ohi was always destined to be chosen.

• GW3 Captain Score: 2pt

• Best GW3 Captain Score: 14pts (Andreas Hanche-Olsen, 5.7m)

• Points Lost: 12pts

Sandberg and Daouda Bamba (9.2m) also scored well with 13pts and to be honest all three were good alternatives. Ironically my vice-captain was Gilbert Koomson (7.1m) who failed to join the party, gaining a poultry 2pts.

Another 12pts lost due to my Captain not turning up. I absolutely refuse to be frustrated with this choice. It was not a bad captaincy pick at all. In fact, I don’t see why I’d choose any of those other players over Ohi in that situation again. I’d do the exact same thing. It was not meant to be, that’s all. Unluckeeeee. (Perfectly Sound Logic, Poor Points)

GAMEWEEK 4 CAPTAIN:

• Lars Jorgen Salvesen [STROMSGODSET TOPPFOTBALL vs aalesunds fk]

Not much to be said about this one. I chose to ignore Borven yet again (also ignoring hat-trick against Valerenga) and for some reason found way back to Salvesen. There seems to be a pattern here – I am drawn more to fixture than form when it comes to not only transfers, but captaincy picks. This methodology ultimately seems to have been my downfall. Gameweek 4 was to be no different.

Salevesen had just two shots in the entire game and they were both blocked. He did create on big chance and played a key pass, but other than that he was largely anonymous. Borven on the other hand ran riot again, racking up 15pts against a shell-shocked IK Start.

The 6ft 1” Norwegian had hoodwinked me once more, pulling me away from the advances of the more diminutive figure of the Trondheim-bound Odd forward, only to lead to me into more ruination. Four gameweeks in and still without success. Where was MY Captain?

• GW4 Captain Score: 2pt

• Best GW4 Captain Score: 7pts (Jens Petter Hauge, 7.9m/Gilbert Koomson)

• Points Lost: 5pts

Koomson was never going to be trusted to outscore Salvesen as he had a much lower ceiling relative to their fixtures. Hauge was perhaps on paper a better alternative but in the end I thought Stromsgodset would run riot, leading to many, many points for their leading man. Once more, twas not to be and I was left licking the wounds of another self-inflicted injury.

Aware of Bodo/Glimt’s form, I did have both Hauge and Kasper Junker (8.8m) in my team but even so I refused to accept Salvesen was not going to outscore any of their assets. This defiance led to a meagre 2pts. On the bright side, Salvesen had DOUBLED his last score so there was that. I should’ve brought Borven in (that’s not Hindsight, I was planning to do it either that week or GW5) but I didn’t. Once again fixture difficulty swayed me into a poor decision. (So-so Logic, Poor Points).

GAMEWEEK 5 CAPTAIN:

Torgeir Borven (11.3m) [ROSENBORG BK vs valerenga fotball]

Finally, after weeks of waiting, I’d got my man. In his last two games he’d scored a ridiculous five goals and although Odd were up against Bodo/Glimt, I was confident of goals. Wanting to beat his inevitable price rise was also on my mind so as soon as ‘Gameweek 4’ concluded, I got rid of ‘Deadwood Salevesen’ and welcomed Herr Borven into my team. He was to be my Captain no matter what.

You cannot make it up. Borven’s move to Rosenborg was set to go through on 1st August, meaning he would remain an Odd player until then, even if it would mean Rosenborg would have to wait. Apparently they were unhappy to do this. His move to Trondheim was finalised less than 24 hours after he found himself in my team. Cue even bigger sigh.

His first game for Rosenborg would come too soon and he wasn’t even given half an hour to get a debut goal. I simply could not believe my luck. This was the guy I’d been monitoring for the last couple of gameweeks (as well as during pre-season) and when I had finally convinced myself I should take the leap, he finds himself sitting on the bench of Norway’s biggest club, my Fantasy armband tucked away in his pocket.

• GW5 Captain Score: 1pt

• Best GW5 Captain Score: 10pts (Gilbert Koomson/Kasper Junker/Andreas Hopmark 4.6m)

• Points Lost: 9pts

Obviously I was never going to captain Hopmark but Junker and Koomson were perfectly viable alternatives. My actual vice was Sandberg (vs ik start) which in itself, was not a bad choice (fixture-wise) but would have only yielded two more points.

It seems that choosing the right Captain is something I struggle with far more than is necessary. The right man eludes me still. I am the Cinderella of Fantasy Football, with no ‘glass armband’ in sight.

I should never have captained Borven as he had just moved to Rosenborg a day or two before. He wasn’t guaranteed a start (though I thought it likely) and Rosenborg are a team far from their best, playing insipid, uncreative football (more so at the time than now) making Borven a far worse choice than multiple other options. (Poor Logic, Poor Choice).

GAMEWEEK 6 CAPTAIN:

Veton Berisha (8.9m) [VIKING FK vs ik start]

Out with the old (and disgruntled) Bamba, and in with the new (and very much in-form) Veton Berisha. IK Start had faced 69 shots and conceded 13 goals prior to the visit of under-performing Viking. Going into this game Berisha had scored 2 goals and got 2 assists in his previous three games. Not ground-breaking form, more a solid foundation to build upon especially with such a favourable fixture.

Now. I’m sure you’re beginning to see the picture by now. Yeah, that whole ‘form plus fixture’ spiel I keep banging on about? Failed me again, didn’t it? I’m not the biggest Beatles fan in the world, so maybe it’s because whenever I think of Bodo/Glimt I imagine a big yellow submarine and on some psychological level I’m put off, but that’s clearly something I need to deal with.

I even mentioned in comments prior to the games that I thought Bodo/Glimt will deal with Brann more than comfortably but I didn’t envisage 5 goals and certainly didn’t think Junker would get ANOTHER hat-trick. I had confidence in my new signing to continue his good form against one of the weakest teams in the league.

• GW6 Captain Score: 2pt

• Best GW5 Captain Score: 17pts (Kasper Junker)

• Points Lost: 15pts

Another swing, another miss. Like, I didn’t just miss the ball, I threw the bat into a nearby lake then punched a swan for good luck. At this point I’m not just sighing, I’m staring out the window trying to figure out why the Fantasy Football gods are so upset with me to no avail.

This is one of my least questionable picks. I refuse to accept this was a bad pick. Because it wasn’t. Viking may be underperforming, and Bodo/Glimt might be cruising, but Berisha is a very good player, capable of bringing home plenty of bacon, and IK Start might as well be a pig lying on it’s side telling everyone in the nearby vicinity to come grab a slice or two.

Berisha blanked for the first time in three games against one of the worst teams in the league. This was bad timing more than anything. Another 15pts lost all the same. (Sound Logic, Poor Points).

CONCLUSION

After much beard twirling and enough sighing to convince anyone who wasn’t too sure that I am indeed British, I have arrived at my conclusion. At least three of my captain picks were based on sound logic, two could be debated either way and one was certainly a poor choice. With 50% of my choices being perfectly reasonable, I am understandably frustrated by not being rewarded with any points but find it hard to be annoyed as the logic was sound.

The two debatable choices could be easily argued either way, so while they weren’t the best choices I could’ve made, they certainly weren’t awful. There was only one captaincy pick I definitely shouldn’t have done – it still stings now – yet it only resulted in a loss of 8pts.

The point of this article is to empathise with all of you who have suffered from poor captaincy picks. It’s also to show exactly how damaging blanking Captains can be to your team. If I had made the correct decision each and every week for the last six gameweeks, I would have amassed another 53pts. That equates to 10,711 places. That is how powerful the captain chip is. It will either give you or take from you, thousands and thousands of places in the ranking system.

My rank should be higher than it is. But ultimately it is down to me and me alone to choose whose points I wish to double on a weekly basis. Good logic (based on whatever variable you wish to look at) is always a good reason to do anything. Fantasy Football is a multi-faceted game which means if you only look at one variable – you are already in trouble. This is exactly what has happened to, pretty much from before the season started.

If I had trusted my instincts and gone with Borven from the start, we’d be looking at a very different picture, the same way in which if I didn’t convince myself Bodo/Glimt were a bunch of charlatans I’d have had a much stronger squad from Day 1.

Captains are no reason to stop playing this game. You cannot and will not get it right all the time. Those who do seem to choose better than most are either luckier than you, or I’m sorry to say it, a bit smarter. I certainly feel as though I have been somewhat put in my place and humbled for the last few weeks. I am not the biggest fan of the captaincy option as it adds another element of luck-based scoring to the game, yet I can see the appeal. It’s a point of weekly discussion. It makes the games more interesting and it also gives us a reason to vent if we fail.

Those in the same boat as me (I’m hoping I’m not alone here – I’m not the best rower) do not panic or stress or get annoyed or stop playing the game. If like me you can surmise you were right to captain who you did at least 50% of the time – you have no reason to be annoyed if you missed points. The decision can be the right one even if it yields no gains. That’s the definition of unlucky. That’s all it is.

The law of averages dictates you will get it right at some point so keep that in mind and keep approaching each gameweek with sound logic but perhaps open your mind to other variables you have perhaps been blind to so far.

ReindeerHotdog ESF: https://en.fantasy.eliteserien.no/entry/12433/event/17 Follow me on Twitter: @ReindeerHotdog

481 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Rotation's Alter Ego
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 12 Years
    3 years, 9 months ago

    Another fantastic article, not sure there's much worse for a fantasy manager than repeated captaincy failures regardless of if you make the logical decisions or not!

    Must say, this does include one of my favourite lines I've read in a community article:

    "Another swing, another miss. Like, I didn’t just miss the ball, I threw the bat into a nearby lake then punched a swan for good luck." Love it 😆

    1. ReindeerHotdog
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 9 months ago

      Hah.

      It's not even been minor bad luck. Or just hindsight. It's been full on ridiculous so far.

      Rank is hugely affected by captaincy. Far more than people think.

      Well, you know, sometimes swans gonna get punched you know?

      1. J ⚒ Gimme ur Mané
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        3 years, 9 months ago

        You crack me up 😆

        Thanks a ton for all of the content, really appreciate it.

        Next level of insight !

  2. El Puqi
    • 4 Years
    3 years, 9 months ago

    Great article again!

    I can totally feel you, with 4/6 captaincy blanks for me.

    In the future I need to go with the best players in the best form. No more Salvesen or Berisha or Sandberg, more of Borven, Zinck & Junker. I’ll also admit that too many times I’ve gone for that big haul, when I really should be captaining the consistant player who can be explosive. Like Eikrem (if I owned him) or Zinckernagel, for example.

    1. ReindeerHotdog
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 9 months ago

      Cheers!

      Nice. 4/6 is a good return.

      The main point is you can look at one aspect (form, fixture, reputation, team they play for etc...) but in doing so you'll overlook another important asiect for that week.

      As soon as I decided it was just fixture that mattered, I shut myself off from those other variables.

      Ah well, I just gotta be more flexible going forward.

      1. El Puqi
        • 4 Years
        3 years, 9 months ago

        I agree.

        Also, I’ve always been a man of fixtures. Captaincy or transfers overall, I feel likeI focus toi much on fixtures and forget other important aspects.

        I’d say 4 blanks out of 6 weeks is pretty bad but I think you understood me wrong there, haha! I wish I nailed it 4/6 times...

        1. ReindeerHotdog
          • 3 Years
          3 years, 9 months ago

          Oh, yeah I got that confused haha.

          2 out of 6 right calls is still pretty good! Over the course of a season that's 10/30. Not a bad return but yeah, always can be improved upon.

          The whole point of the article is to assess the logic with which we apply when making that decision and how the outcome of that decision can affect your rank, and what can be done to move forward in the right direction.

          I have blanked in all 6 of my picks. I hope my article makes it clear I am 100% happy with half of those picks - it just didn't work out. The ONLY choice I'm annoyed with is my Borven pick. It was out of stubbornness and should never have been a choice.

          This was as much for me as it was for anyone else reading - I need to look at more than just fixture. I seem to ignore whatever the team the guy is playing for and focus more on opposition. It's not enough - there's more I can be doing.

          I think as long as you're happy with your decision then you should be happy with the outcome no matter what. I had no idea how much of an impact the captaincy has on overall score though - it's absolutely huge.

          Hopefully you make it 3/7 this weekend!

          1. El Puqi
            • 4 Years
            3 years, 9 months ago

            Cheers lad, I hope you nail your first pick as well! Who do you have in mind btw? Bodo boys or Borven, perhaps?

            My plan was to go with Attack Attack -chip but I’m not so sure anymore. Berisha and more so Viking didn’t convince me last week, and neither did Borven really. But I trust Borven, and he really should deliver against SIF.

            But yeah, Berisha and Viking worries me.

            1. ReindeerHotdog
              • 3 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              Cheers. I think it has to be one of the Bodo players. Form, fixture, best team in the league. Seems like a no-brainer.

              Viking are under-performing compared to how they played last season. That's irrefutable. And Berisha is a strange one. Looking at his stats it shows he's just not getting as involved as his peers.

              526mins (almost 6 full games)
              2 Goals, 2 Assists, 10 shots
              5 key passes, 2 big chances created, 205 touches, 133/88 passes.
              He's not been terrible but when you look at those numbers compared to rival choices it's clear he's not as good at the moment.

              Junker for comparison has 8 goals, 4 assists, 11 key passes, 3 big chances created, 156 touches and 94/70 passes.

              I know his per/game stats aren't brilliant and he seems to be providing a lot more crosses than any other forward player (in the game) and seems to have the ball a bit more. I'd be holding for now as I think he's going to get better. The last game vs Start was actually one of his better performances:

              Berisha vs IK Start (away):
              4 shots, 1 on, 1 off, 2 blocked
              3/2 dribbles, 59 touches, 33/23 passes, 2 key passes, 6/2 crosses, 6/4 long balls, 1 big chance created, 3 clearances, 1 tackle.

              I'm happy with him in my team but I'll reassess in a few weeks and go from there.

              Borven is currently my Captain. Objectively it's hard to argue against Junker/Zinckernagel. I suppose it's a question of do I go with who I think everyone else will go with and captain one of those two, do I play Two Captains chip on those two or do I go against the grain and think Borven will bury Stromsgodset?
              He was certainly more up for it the their away win against Stabaek but it's still far more of a risk than Zinck/Junker.

  3. Badluck Jonathan
    • 9 Years
    3 years, 9 months ago

    I’ve not had many captain successes in the past 6 weeks either. Looking back it is always difficult to separate bad luck from sub-optimal decision making, especially since many sub-optimal decisions actually get rewarded with points- for me and others!

    What i’m sure is not helpful though is repeating the line to ourselves that “if only I’d done x, I’d be y places higher”. It just isn’t true. Because if everyone had the chance to go back and correct their mistakes, or even rearrange their captain choice with the benefit of hindsight, you would might even have a worse rank. Or in that scenario is it just you that gets to rejig the decisions of the past?

    The past is set in stone so let’s learn what we can and not beat ourselves up too much. We’ve only had 6 out of 30 gameweeks. Plenty of time to turn things around

    1. ReindeerHotdog
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 9 months ago

      That's not what I've tried to convey at all.

      I've highlighted the impact the captaincy chip has on rank.

      As I've said, I've quite literally summed up whether I thought my choice was logical or not.

      I showed the difference in rank to highlight how much impact captaincy has, and how easy it is to get wrong.

      It's supposed to say to others who have failed - “don't give up, this part of the game is just a bit annoying."

      Not sure where you're getting that hindsight/wish I could change the last attitude from - it's certainly not been written here. I thought I was quite obvious with what I meant. Frustrating if you feel this was a hindsight post. I can assure you it definitely isn't.

    2. ReindeerHotdog
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 9 months ago

      Yeah I've just read through the article - I've got no idea what you're on about.

      To be frank, it's decidedly obvious what I'm on about.

      There is no mention of a do-over or anything like that.. I even state - numerous times - I'm looking into the logic of the picks, why I chose them, why I was blinkered, why I was right or wrong to do so, what affect that's had on my team and rank and to sympathise with other managers.

      I only said "if X then Y" to highlight the power of the chip.

      I even say that I'm happy with the majority of my picks. Did you not read the entire thing? I'm utterly confused as to how you've come to this conclusion where I'm moaning, using hindsight to think I should be having a great season and that only I matter.

      I can't help you out if you're convinced by that but it's clearly not what I've written about here. I am quite sarcastic to a point - maybe that's throwing you. Who knows.

      Anyways, I'm sorry you find my piece to be offensive in that respect - but you've got completely the wrong of the stick like you're not even looking at a stick just what you perceive to be a stick.

      Good luck for this week and trust me, if I'm unlucky with my captaincy I'll let you know where I should be!

      1. Badluck Jonathan
        • 9 Years
        3 years, 9 months ago

        Hey...

        I’m not accusing you of moaning or offended or anything like that. Just making a small point in response as part of the conversation.

        Should have said I appreciate the article and the effort that goes in.

        I wish you every success in your future selections 🙂

        1. ReindeerHotdog
          • 3 Years
          3 years, 9 months ago

          I just hope you understand the reasoning behind the inclusion of "if x then y" because it's meant to show how much of an impact the chip has.

          Of course we have to live and die by our mistakes - that's fine by me. I do find it helpful to analyse what we have done, why we have done those things and what could have been different. It's important to analyse so we can better understand our actions and the outcomes.

          This certainly isn't me trying to suggest I am the most unlucky boy in the world, it's meant to mainly sympathise with others in a similar position and say "you know what, it's just one of those things."

          Main issue I have with Fantasy Football is the tendency to make the same mistake again and again, while convincing myself I'm not. Writing stuff like this is helpful to me, too, because it shows why I thought a certain way and if I took another minute how that might've been better for me.

          In my head it's always helpful to analyse as much as possible as that should (should) lead to higher chance of success in the future. But hey, here we are, and I'm still waiting!

          Can't see past a Glimt player for this week though. Who are you going with?

          1. Badluck Jonathan
            • 9 Years
            3 years, 9 months ago

            I get it. Instinctively I analyse everything and i agree that it’s super important to analyse your own decisions if you want to avoid the same mistakes.

            Captain is always going to have a big impact and can be frustrating as it increases the chance element of the game. I tend towards choosing a popular captain to mitigate its impact (positive or negative) and try to gain ground with the rest of my squad- that’s the theory anyway!!!

            I am playing with 2 captains this week (Junker and Zinkernagel)... fingers crossed

            1. ReindeerHotdog
              • 3 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              Yeah that's another method. Go for who everyone else is going for.

              I was thinking about covering different methodologies in the article but I wanted to mainly stick to "don't worry - captaincy is a gamble and as long you're trying to gamble as little as possible, whatever the outcome you did what you did based on logic."

              But yeah, logic only gets you so far. Buriden's Ass springs to mind.

              I'm thinking Zinck/Junker are the best options this week and will probably go with one. I currently have it on Borven but I doubt I'll have the balls to go through with it. Everything is pointed to Bodo.

  4. Men in green tights
    • 5 Years
    3 years, 9 months ago

    Going by all the bad luck , you still give good advice out .I got rid of Bovren before his 2 big hauls but then since then he has been matched or bettered by the players I had brought in on my wildcard had 2 bad weeks so far.
    So the question is who is everyone go for captain this week I am going for one of the BG players .
    Cheers

    1. ReindeerHotdog
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 9 months ago

      I do try. That's always the point of these articles - discuss what's happened to me and relate that to everyone else in a way which means we can all learn from it.

      As I've said in the article - I'm happy with majority of my picks. Just bad luck.

      Think it's important to look at 'what could've been' as that highlights exactly how strong the chip is and how on another day you'd be looking at a better rank. That's also to say that if you get it wrong a couple of times you might see your rank start to plummet. It's one of the most volatile aspects of Fantasy Football and can be utterly demoralising if you keep getting it wrong.

      As long as your logic is sound or you're happy to acknowledge you're choosing someone more on a whim, then the result is easier to live with.

      One thing I've learned is that after looking back at all my picks, I remembered making them and the reasons behind those choices. I came to the conclusion that I was mostly happy with who I picked. That turned out to be encouraging more than anything, especially when I consider the fact that there's more I can be doing in order to make better, more well-informed captaincy choices going forward.

      Analysis is one of the most important things we can do as human beings - we'd be fools to think we know all there is to know and live by that. It certainly applies to Fantasy Football, too!

      You can never go wrong with B/G players. Hauge/Zinckernagel/Junker even Saltnes are all good choices. I'm currently on Borven as I fancy Rosenborg to pummel Stromsgodset and for him to be involved. Safer bet might be Junker/Zinckernagel as Glimt could be winning that game 6/7/8/9 nil. But again, the first thing I think of is the fixture rather than form. If you combine fixture AND form it's obvious that it should be either Zinckernagel or Junker. So I think I have to go with one of those two...

  5. MTPockets
      3 years, 9 months ago

      Great read. Eliteserien can be a very frustrating game but that's what makes it fun.
      Who are you captaining this week...?

      1. ReindeerHotdog
        • 3 Years
        3 years, 9 months ago

        Cheers MT.

        You want to know so you can avoid completely? Is that it?

        Ha, I think I'll be going Junker/Zinckernagel. Like everyone else. Hard to justify choosing anyone else really.

        1. MTPockets
            3 years, 9 months ago

            Eikrem/Bamba it is then.
            No I haven't decided yet. Was James GW1 then Eikrem since, but BG the obvious choice this week.

            1. ReindeerHotdog
              • 3 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              Haha. To be honest Bamba/Koomson would be a fine shout as they're up against Sandefjord.

              Eikrem makes sense as he didn't play much last game. So either of those would be a good pick!

              I'm finding it really hard to think of any reason to captain anyone other than Zinck/Junker this week so ultimately I will fall onto one of those two. Personally think Zinckernagel is the better option as he's more involved in the games, on pens etc... but Junker just needs to be given the ball and he'll score. Next touch he'll play a key pass and set someone else up. And so on. So they're both very good players for very different reasons.

              1. MTPockets
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  Form and fixture for both - can't argue with that. Agree on Zinckernagel, but Junker's also a bp darling.
                  Zinckernagel's also getting more minutes, but guess there's a risk that one of these weeks Zinck will get an early sub.

                  1. ReindeerHotdog
                    • 3 Years
                    3 years, 9 months ago

                    This is what I mean! It's a lottery.

                    Like, for the first few gameweeks maybe less so regarding rotation. But now?

                    Is either of them due a rest? Will AAFK pull of a miracle win? Junker early sub? Zinck dropped?

                    ARGH. I really do not like this aspect of the game. So many variables not enough time.

                    1. El Puqi
                      • 4 Years
                      3 years, 9 months ago

                      They’ve had a week ”rest” now, so I don’t think they’ll get rested. If it’s someone then it’s Hauge as he played full 90.

                      At least that how I feel.

                      1. ReindeerHotdog
                        • 3 Years
                        3 years, 9 months ago

                        Yeah, first week long rest of the season. You'd imagine everyone is fit and raring to go.

                        I think it's a 50/50 between Zinck and Junker. I'll make sure to let everyone else know who I'm going with beforehand so you can captain the other guy don't worry..

                        1. El Puqi
                          • 4 Years
                          3 years, 9 months ago

                          Haha, I think I’m leaning towards the double captain chip now with Junker & Zinck.

                          Attack Attack chip was my plan all along but like I said earlier, I’m not confident with Berisha and might even move on from him and get Hauge while I can.

        2. FPL Bielsa
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 7 Years
          3 years, 9 months ago

          They will never take the captain chip out of the game but for me it reduces the skill involved and inevitably adds a degree of pure luck. In many ways the best policy to minimise this is go for a perma captain like Salah or KDB in FPL which pays off over a whole season.

          Now the question would be who is the best perma captain in Elitisarien ? harder to say I think but for me at present it’s Junker, two successes last two weeks and I think I’ll just leave it on him for now.

          Last season my second in Elitisarien I lost a bit of interest and left the team completely alone for the second half of the season, the captain was Ohi each week and when I eventually came back I found I’d shotup the rankings mainly due to him.

          1. ReindeerHotdog
            • 3 Years
            3 years, 9 months ago

            The choir is being preached at.

            I completely agree. It adds an element of excitement every week. A topic of discussion. Another aspect of the games you're watching. Drama. BUT it does of course add another opportunity for points to be generated. And as you say, it's down to luck.

            Liverpool could win 5-0 and Salah might have an off day. But, Salah would be a great pick most weeks. So as you say, it's a numbers game. Do you always leave it on Salah and accept the fact you'll blank some weeks but in others you'll haul? Or do you actively try to hunt down the best Captains each week?

            I think permanently captaining one player is probably more likely to yield higher returns. It has to. Looking at the numbers involved, to choose the right player out of 11, each week, consecutively for 30 weeks - I'm not great with permutations but that's not very likely. However, if you're always on the same player, you're in effect happy to double say, 130 points over the course of the season. In ESN that's the equivalent of doubling 5 points every week. That's surely not to be sniffed at, no?

            I lost interest, too. I also found my rank severely boosted by my permanent Captaincy. I can relate.

            I suppose the best way to approach it is to find a way you think is most logical and fun and stick with it.

            1. FPL Bielsa
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 7 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              I probably go with the captain poll leader most weeks in FPL unless I get a strong hunch about someone. In Elitisarien for now I think it has to be a BG man if not Junker then Zinck or Hauge as they seem certain to return each week.

              Also can depend on rank if I’m doing ok I’m more cautious but if I’m having a bad season it’s easier to take a risk.

        3. Stats Don\'t Lie
          • 9 Years
          3 years, 9 months ago

          Zinck + Junker 2 captains this gw FTW!

          1. ReindeerHotdog
            • 3 Years
            3 years, 9 months ago

            That is very tempting! I thought the same thing earlier when I was brushing my teeth.

            Attack! Attack! has been suggested, too. Not sure if Glimt will get an easier game all season but that then begs the question - will they take it easy?

            There's so many variables it's hard to be happy with whatever decision I end up making!

            I think at the very least my Captain will be one of those two, but as to whether I use a chip or not, I'm very much on the fence.

        4. SEXY SOLO SAUCE
          • 7 Years
          3 years, 9 months ago

          Everyone happy about Sterling benched then?

          1. SEXY SOLO SAUCE
            • 7 Years
            3 years, 9 months ago

            Wrong article again, sorry

            1. Ze_Austin
              • 5 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              Didn't age well either

        5. El Puqi
          • 4 Years
          3 years, 9 months ago

          What are the news on Hauge? When is he leaving? Or is he? I’d like to bring him in instead of Berg but the uncertainty around him is putting me off.

            1. El Puqi
              • 4 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              Cheers. I guess I need to bring him in next week. 🙂

        6. MTPockets
            3 years, 9 months ago

            Nordic Football Pod: https://twitter.com/nordicfootpod/status/1280873070002089989
            Interview with one of the Eurosport UK Eliteserien commentators Tim Caple. Says they were originally planning to show first 3 rounds but if proves/continues to be popular they'll keep showing the games. Think I'll take out a sub.

          • Men in green tights
            • 5 Years
            3 years, 9 months ago

            Do we think gregersen (mol) is going to make the starting line up this weekend can't seem to find out why he is injured again as the other week the flag was off him.
            Any ideas anyone?
            Cheers

            1. Onz
              • 6 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              Should be fit for at least the bench but I would like to see some reports from the training. We could get some idea by Friday.

              1. Men in green tights
                • 5 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                Cheers

            2. Eytexi
              • 5 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              We get early team news for Molde this weekend thankfully.

          • Onz
            • 6 Years
            3 years, 9 months ago

            I am on WC atm and have
            Viking pairing for goalkeepers, I know they have injury problems for that position but I assume Austbo will recover quickly. Good for save points and the odd clean sheet.
            Gregersen ( injured), Valsvik, Hanche Olsen, Heggheim, ( Nakkim)
            Wolf, Pellegrino, Zinckernagle, Trodsen ( I know he is an oop defender), (Berg).
            Borven, Junker ( Bringaker)

            No Brann cover, I only like the look of the expensive Brann assets and they are poor atm. They need another Wormgoor to inspire them.
            I assume Gregersen will be back soon along with Haugen so with the bench cover I have he can stay for the moment.
            Ohi and James are too expensive atm. I could live to regret ruling James out of my team for the season but Ohi could come into play for me at some stage.
            Borven speaks for himself and RBK can only improve. I sold Eggan to spread a bit of cash through the rest of the squad as I believe Valsvik is nailed. Trondsen is still a good pick at his price but not an easy one to upgrade to say Sandberg.
            Can be played in a 442 or 343 having playing bench cover if required.
            Comments appreciated, thanks in advance.

            1. MTPockets
                3 years, 9 months ago

                Not so confident about Viking keepers but then I have the Mjondalen pair so can't criticise.
                Agree on Brann vs alternatives, at least after the next 3 gw. Having said that I'm still not sure about Borven at rbk. Apparently Islamovic looked good when he came on, and scored.
                Assume you'll want more Molde (and perhaps Start) for gw12, but a while to go yet.
                Is Valsvik nailed? He and Hovland seem to be rotating. Trondsen's an awkward price point for 4th mid, but could be good.
                There are a few 5th mid options - Berg, Saletros, Normann Hansen, Bell - but if you're happy with using a BG spot for Berg then cool.

              • Eytexi
                • 5 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                Although Austbø has been good, I would be looking to spend around 4.5m for a keeper on WC simply because there's so few points to be reliably gained here.

                I certainly wouldn't own Nakkim, I'm looking to sell soon to bring in Aasbak or Hopmark. I like the Heggheim & RBK defensive picks; Hanche-Olsen could become a Brann or another Molde defender but seems like a solid pick himself.

                Hauge looks an important player to own until he leaves given his relatively low ownership in comparison to Zinck & Junker. Would prefer Salétros or another KBK midfielder to Trondsen, but if there's a price point to punt at this is it.

                Forwards are flawless, Bringaker perhaps expendable for extra cash.

                A good squad overall, that's just what I'd personally do differently - good luck! 🙂

            2. Men in green tights
              • 5 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              Midfield and attack looks strong ,
              Defence not sure about Valsvik in regards he didn't play for 3 games but will monitor myself as could be a good one , was looking at Heggheim myself as he looks nailed and cheap to free some money up.So good looking team might of been tempted to go for Hauge over berg but I can see where you have spread the funds well so good luck.

              1. Men in green tights
                • 5 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                Reply fail for above oops

              2. Onz
                • 6 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                I follow RBK and have done for a number of years, the fans like Valsvik and now they have a change in management he should be nailed in a more attack minded formation.
                check out rbkweb.no chat forum. Google translate is not bad and they do not mind my Kiwi Norwegian posting.

                1. Men in green tights
                  • 5 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  Will do cheers

                2. Paul Psychic Octopus
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 13 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  Well that's interesting. I hd Valsvik from the off, kept him for 5 weeks, and managed to squeeze one clean sheet out of him.

                  But it seemed he moved to live on the RBK bench permanently, so I binned him - just in time for his goal and second clean sheet obviously.

                  I don't mind reversing a decision, just like Boris. But I'd like to see a bit of selection consistency first.

                  Having zero Rosenberg players cannot be right long-term, however bad they've been up until last weekend.

            3. Eytexi
              • 5 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              Stian's (Gregersen's) prognosis is uncertain, and he will be out indefinitely, head coach Erling Moe told the club's website.

              Source: https://www.eurosport.no/fotball/eliteserien/2020/molde-spiller-ute-pa-ubestemt-tid-prognosen-er-usikker_sto7800577/story-amp.shtml?__twitter_impression=true

              1. Sandstorm
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 14 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                Aarrgghhh. Cheers though.

                Eurosport Jonas is apparently on wildcard, here are some of his choices for defender. I think our own El Puqi had many of them in his list too!

                "Jonas på WC. Store dilemmaet er i forsvaret. Mange fine kandidater (ref siste tweet). Hva tenker folket?

                5.5 er Thomassen og Desler

                5.0-kandidatene er: Borchgrevink, Aasbak, Solheim, Dragsnes, Kolskogen.

                4.5 er Sørmo no1

                4.0 er Vogt og Daland"

                https://mobile.twitter.com/ESNFantasy/status/1281201843343949824

                1. Eytexi
                  • 5 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  Already did Ohi to Børven with the FT so will happily bench Greg this week, Daland starting in his place.

                  1. Men in green tights
                    • 5 Years
                    3 years, 9 months ago

                    Just was about to ask if worth taking a hit in replacing Gregersen guess the answer will be no as no high rewards in defence but with him out that leaves me with ,Hopmark(STB),Kristiansen (San),Nakkim(vif) and Daland(sob).
                    At the moment going with at the back of Hopmark,Kristiansen and Nakkim.
                    Cheers in advance

                    1. Eytexi
                      • 5 Years
                      3 years, 9 months ago

                      I'd be more than happy with that, much better this week than my: Solheim, Nakkim, Daland. I'd sort Greg only when you need - hoping he's back sooner than expected.

                      1. Men in green tights
                        • 5 Years
                        3 years, 9 months ago

                        Cheers, let's hope he is back before gw12 .

                2. ReindeerHotdog
                  • 3 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  Got Sormo, Daland. Had Desler - wish I moved to Thomassen - looks good stats wise and is in midfield.

                  Currently with Kristiansen and Hanche-Olsen with Hopmark.

                  Will look to downgrade Kristiansen or Olsen at some point but I'm convinced Thomassen is worth the price and I don't wanna get rid of both Olsen and Kristiansen!

                  Dilemma.

              2. Team Cruel
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 8 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                Glad there’s some clarity now. Easy switch to Thomassen who I really wanted before Start.

                1. Sandstorm
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 14 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  I did Bojang -> Thomassen earlier this GW and since I had one free transfer left I did last night Greg -> Sørmo. He had nice heatmap and 1.5 key passes per game looked good. The rest are Pereira, Desler & Vogt. Pereira next to go at some point unless he starts getting some serious points. His points/price -ratio is pretty bad right now.

            4. FPLShaqiri
              • 6 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              Had a good restart in FPL, but keep getting captaincy wrong. If I had captained my vice captain I'd be 41 points better off (8k instead of 29k). I know these things even out over the long term, but got to admit there's a decent amount of luck involved too!

              30+: Aguero over KDB (-7)
              31+: Jimenez over Mane (0)
              32+: Jimenez over Aubameyang (-14)
              33+: Salah over Fernandes (-9)
              34+: KDB over Salah (-11)

              Next week another coin flip between Fernandes and Vardy, hopefully can get that one right.

              1. FPLShaqiri
                • 6 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                sorry wrong article!

              2. HNI
                • 11 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                Well I got only 45% captains right. Even if I had 75% success I would be in top 100 now! From what I have seen, many high rankers just captained Salah for 34gws unless he is injured. Maybe next season you can keep perma captain on Bruno amd will reap the benefits as Manutd look to finish 2nd-3rd next season

              3. ReindeerHotdog
                • 3 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                At least you're on topic hah.

                Captaincy is a frustrating part of the game. Easy to rue choices that went wrong and feel particularly clever when you get it right.

                I'd personally prefer to not have it but then you take away a huge variable that can make mini leagues quite dramatic.

                As long as you approach the choice with as much logic as possible then that's all you can do.

                There is something to be said for perma-capping a premium asset though. I might look into that over the course of the season to try and work out exactly that points disparity.

            5. FPL Bielsa
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 7 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              Got two free transfers this week and not sure how to use them. Current team:

              Makani / Gregersen Desler Hanche-O / Sandberg Koomson Zinch Hauge Pelleg / Junker (C) Bovren subs Myrah Shuaibu Naakim Daaland

              Was all set to do Sandberg to Zachariesen and Desler to Hopmark but not sure now with Gregs injury, do i take him out for a KBK man ? any advice from those in the know appreciated.

              1. El Puqi
                • 4 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                I’d do Sandberg & Gregersen to Zachariassen & Sormo, if you’re keen on Zach.

                Good luck!

                1. ReindeerHotdog
                  • 3 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  Dude. I've done Adekugbe to Sormo. Did that instantly last weekend.

                  Next transfer I'm looking at is Sandberg to Zach. Took the words right out of my mouth aha. But if I did that it would be for -4.

                  Genuinely think it'll be worth it. I'll probably pull the trigger tomorrow if it doesn't look like either will change price beforehand.

                  1. El Puqi
                    • 4 Years
                    3 years, 9 months ago

                    Hehe.

                    Surely Zach will outscore Sandberg by at least 4 points in the next 6-8 weeks, right? So yeah imo go for it. Well if you have no other problems then maybe you can wait a week and then get for free.

              2. Men in green tights
                • 5 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                See that Naakim is flagged now with an arm break.

                1. Paul Psychic Octopus
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 13 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  Oh just great. A broken arm, but 75% chance of playing. Yeah, right.

                  Could be worse - if he had a broken leg might only have a 50% chance of playing this weekend,

                  1. ReindeerHotdog
                    • 3 Years
                    3 years, 9 months ago

                    Broken Spine - 25% Chance of Playing

                    1. Paul Psychic Octopus
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 13 Years
                      3 years, 9 months ago

                      Don't go there. I broke my neck in three places 2 years ago but still ended up carrying fence panels and furniture while in a neck brace a week or so later. I reckon I could have done a 20-minute football cameo though.

                      1. ReindeerHotdog
                        • 3 Years
                        3 years, 9 months ago

                        My L5 degenerated last January. Still not recovered. Femoral and sciatic nerve pain 17 months later.
                        About 3k of therapy later and still not much better.

                        So yeah, spinal injuries are not fun. Neither is being hooked on like 3 drugs to deal with the pain. But you know.

                        1. Paul Psychic Octopus
                          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                          • 13 Years
                          3 years, 9 months ago

                          I've avoided taking meds, just try to keep mobile and playing as much active sport as possible. Friday night switch regime to a couple of stiff gins. This rhubarb and ginger gin I'm onto the second glass of right now beats Naproxen hands down.

                          1. ReindeerHotdog
                            • 3 Years
                            3 years, 9 months ago

                            I'm 33. I'm afraid the meds are needed - without them I'm basically bed-ridden. Morphine/pregabalin and diazepam. All needed. As awful as that may be.

                            As it's my lowest disc that's degenerated, means the rest are bound to be stressed a lot over the next couple of decades.

                            Nerve pain is an absolute killer. Like boiling hot water being poured through the inside of your leg. Never enjoyable!

                            Keeping active is not possible at the moment other than basic walking/moving around. The aim is to be able to ride a bike on the road by May next year. Might not be able to do that though.

                            My chiro has said due to me being quite young I'd qualify for disc replacement surgery (through the NHS) after I've regained all core strength I've lost through muscular atrophy.

                            Physio for the rest of my life but it'll hopefully make me fitter than I would've been normally! Unfortunately can never play football etc again, but at least if I invest a lot of time and effort into Fantasy Football I'll be good at one type of football!

                            1. Paul Psychic Octopus
                              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                              • 13 Years
                              3 years, 9 months ago

                              Gosh, that seems worse than it first sounded. Keep the spirits up - only have one shot at life.

                              I'm 62 and I still play football each week (stopped playing competitively when I was 50). Lockdown means only Keepie-uppie and football tennis on the Common for now. Lucky to be alive after the fall and broken neck, so I now treat every day as a bonus!

                              1. ReindeerHotdog
                                • 3 Years
                                3 years, 9 months ago

                                Good on you mate. Always good to keep active whatever that means.

                                For me it'll be going on long walks with the missus, more than likely around Scandinavia and hiking with our dogs.

                                I can envisage some scuba diving in there too. Life isn't over - it's just changed.

                                And hey, I get all this time to write for you guys..

                        2. Paul Psychic Octopus
                          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                          • 13 Years
                          3 years, 9 months ago

                          Do sympathise with your condition. Always best to deal with it by non-surgical methods if possible.

                          No fun getting old - and I reckon I must be one of the oldest fantasy football players on here.

                          Having a younger girlfriend helps. That's what Rod Stewart told me anyway.

                          1. Onz
                            • 6 Years
                            3 years, 9 months ago

                            I will hit 60 next birthday 🙂 The old bones take way longer to recover these days. Been lucky with my spine in the last 20 years but have damaged it prior. Physio gave me some tips on looking after it and my work keeps me fit.

                          2. ReindeerHotdog
                            • 3 Years
                            3 years, 9 months ago

                            Main course of therapy is IDD right now, with regular chiro visits and then strength and conditioning afterwards.

                            It's all about knowing which stretches and movements I can do at which time. I had such good progress last year. But then overdid it and fell back like 5 months.

                            My partner is actually 5 years younger than me! She's happy enough to help me with stretches/exercises etc... and tailor our holidays around what I need to do. So that's something at least.

                            Surgical option is only getting disc removed - that's something I could only after recovering enough physically for it to take and mean something.

                            1. Onz
                              • 6 Years
                              3 years, 9 months ago

                              My best mate Terry has just had his second surgery to remove and fuse. the first was 10 years ago. 2/3rds of his spine is now supported by steel and carbon rods so he needs to stretch his arms more to put his socks on. he is in his second week of recovery now and walking short distances but in a lot of pain. He is 65 years old and hopefully we can get back to hunting and fishing soon, the prognosis is good for him. Good luck and hope you are back up and running soon.

                              1. ReindeerHotdog
                                • 3 Years
                                3 years, 9 months ago

                                Good to hear he's a bit better. That really doesn't sound lovely. I know what severe back pain feels like - that sounds horrendous.

                                Spinal fusion is an option for me but I'll be working on non-surgical options first. Need to build my extra-skeletal strength back up. Back has been in atrophy for over a year - every day I wake up it feels like I've been at the gym for 3 hours. Disc replacement down the line but not yet.

                                I have a good support network - without it I'd probably be homeless/struggling for council housing. So I'm thankful for that.

                                I kind of feel like it's the universes way of pushing me away from the path I was going down and onto another one. Obviously I think the universe is indeed indiscriminate, just not when it comes to me...

                                It's cool knowing a few of you are my dad's age - wish he played Fantasy Football. Would be a fun family thing!

                                Good luck to you and your mate and also for this week!

                                1. Paul Psychic Octopus
                                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                                  • 13 Years
                                  3 years, 9 months ago

                                  Well some might think 60+ is a bit old to be playing fantasy football. But I helped develop the first fantasy football game and wrote the first book on it back in 1991/92. I would have been about your age then. Not been able to give it up since! (although did have a 10-year sabbatical)

                                2. ReindeerHotdog
                                  • 3 Years
                                  3 years, 9 months ago

                                  Aha that's awesome.

                                  I don't think age should determine anything you want to do. If you're physically capable of going for runs in the your 60's - do it. Same as with something like this.

                                  Life is whatever you make of it. We all find different things enjoyable and worth investing our time in. Age shouldn't change that.

                  2. Eytexi
                    • 5 Years
                    3 years, 9 months ago

                    Thought this myself mate, surely lost in translation haha.

                2. Lets Talk About 19 Baby
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 9 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  Oh fantastic Nakkim joins Aasbak and Gregerson on the sick note bench. Already done -4 on 3 other transfers. Eliteserien is so frustrating to play. It's hard enough not knowing the players. Now three of the five defenders i have are injured. I only played my wildcard in round 5.

              3. ReindeerHotdog
                • 3 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                I love Hopmark. Think he's a really, really good player. Plays in midfield and took the penalty against Molde and scored it with such composure with last kick of the game.

                Sormo looks quality. No way he stays at KBK next season. Get's forward, makes important passes etc... I think he's great.

                Depends on how much money you have and if you'd prefer spending a bit less. Sormo is probably the best 4.5m defender option in the game in my opinion and he's hardly owned by many at all. Hopmark is just a bit more (4.7m). Not much in it price-wise but yeah, either of those is a great choice I think.

                1. Sandstorm
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 14 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  Problem with Hopmark is that even though he plays in midfield he still is a defensive midfielder. I checked his heatmaps from Sofascore and it looks like he doesn't spend a lot of time in final third. He's no box-to-box midfielder. He has 1.2 key passes per game which is all right but the amount of passes varies a lot: 0 (ros), 4 (AAFK), 0 (hau), 1 (mjo), 2 (MOL), 0 (sif). Of course if he takes KBK's penalties that's an argument for getting him. Disclaimer: I think attacking fullbacks > defensive midfielder OOPs 🙂

                  1. ReindeerHotdog
                    • 3 Years
                    3 years, 9 months ago

                    Yeah I get that. I wasn't trying to imply he's a raging, forward-running box-box player, but he's not sitting at the back doing nothing.

                    If he was 5m I'd be less interested. Fact is he was 4.5m and OOP to the point where he's more likely to be involved in attacking play/might grab the odd assist more so than most 4.5m defenders. Not the case with 5m defenders tho, sure.

                    Sormo I do like. I think he looks a good player. I have them both so ya know, I'm happy with that hah.

                    I do think Thomassen is a great choice - 5.5m might seem high for a Sarpsborg defender, but I like the look of him too.

                    Choosing the right defender is proving a bit annoying this season for sure. I want Haugen but ya know, is he actually gonna be fit again this season hah.

                  2. ReindeerHotdog
                    • 3 Years
                    3 years, 9 months ago

                    And yup, 100% agree with attacking fullbacks being better than OOP DM for sure.

                    If he played for a less-decent, less defensive team he'd be a far less attractive option.

                    What's your defence looking like right now?

                    1. Sandstorm
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 14 Years
                      3 years, 9 months ago

                      My defence is Thomassen, Sørmo, Pereira, Desler & Vogt. Not too happy with Pereira, his value is pretty bad.

                      And to be totally honest I started writing the earlier Hopmark post from the premise that attacking fullbacks > OOP DM and tried to find justification to it! 🙂

                      1. El Puqi
                        • 4 Years
                        3 years, 9 months ago

                        That defence is very good, much better than mine!

                        Pereira to maybe someone like Solheim or Kolskogen could be decent.

                      2. ReindeerHotdog
                        • 3 Years
                        3 years, 9 months ago

                        Nice, nice.

                        Sormo, Hopmark, Kristiansen, Hanche-Olsen & Daland for me.

                        Next to be shipped will be Kristiansen I think. Like the look of Thom but not too sure where I'm going. I'm probably going to evolve my team to have 5 big mids, with a budget forward and I think that will allow me to get Haugen when he's fit again.

                        As soon as Stolas is back he's definitely someone that could easily be slotted if needed.

                  3. Paul Psychic Octopus
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 13 Years
                    3 years, 9 months ago

                    He could be doing six-yard box to penalty box of course. But I agree. DCMs don't go anywhere near the sexy areas that full backs do, and wing backs even more so. But pens are a bonus. Look at Ramos at Real Madrid - one of their top goal scorers!

            6. ReindeerHotdog
              • 3 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              By the way, for anyone around I wanted to put this out there - are people interested in having some Player Comparison/Featured Player articles written?

              I was mulling this over - looking at a team perhaps, and highlighting some of their players. So a combination of the obvious picks as well as some other players people may be overlooking. (Not saying I have the best insight, but it would be something I'd like to look into).

              If that sounds like an interesting read and people would be for it, then I'll look into. It's obviously going to involve some stat collation, scouring results etc.. but if you guys would benefit from it I'll give it a bash.

              1. Sandstorm
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 14 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                Yeah please, look into it!

                Meanwhile here's a thing I love from SofaScore - Goal conversion %. Last year I kept staring at Zlatko Tripic's numbers: gazillion shots but no goals. Then I bought him and he started scoring, that was the highlight of my last season.

                So if you believe in regression to mean -concept you should add to your checklist Helland, Salvesen, Halvorsen, Lauritsen, Velde, Islamović & Ammitzboll while Børven, Pellegrino & Junker have been overperforming. Of course it's too early to take this too seriously but later in the season it might be a bit more useful stat. "Heads up!" sort of post this is. [players order is total shots btw]

                Goals, Total shots, Goal conversion
                1 Philip Zinckernagel 4,19, 21.05%
                2 Kasper Junker 8,15, 53.33%
                3 Daouda Karamoko Bamba 3, 15, 20%
                4 Lars-Jørgen Salvesen 1, 15, 6.67%
                5 Amahl Pellegrino 7, 13, 53.85%
                6 Mikkel Maigaard 3, 12, 25%
                7 Pål André Helland 0, 12, 0%
                8 Matthías Vilhjálmsson 3, 12, 25%
                9 Amin Askar 2, 12, 16.67%
                10 Jens Petter Hauge 3, 11, 27.27%
                11 Magnus Eikrem 2, 11, 18.18%
                12 Ole Jørgen Halvorsen 1, 11, 9.09%
                13 Torgeir Børven 6, 10, 60%
                14 Niklas Sandberg 3, 10, 30%
                15 Tobias Lauritsen 1, 10, 10%
                16 Kristoffer Velde 1, 10, 10%
                17 Shuaibu Lalle Ibrahim 4, 10, 40%
                18 Dino Islamović 1, 10, 10%
                19 Alexander Ballegaard Ammitzboll 1, 10, 10%
                20 Ulrik Saltnes 3, 9, 33.33%

                1. El Puqi
                  • 4 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  Totally agree!

                  Some teams I’d be interested in for example:
                  Kristiansund, Odd, Sarpsborg, Rosenborg and Molde.

                  In terms of those goal conversion stats above, I’d like to see how many of them shots have came from inside the box or how many of them have been big chances. For example, Helland has taken 12 shots but has only had 1 big chance and he missed that. Not exactly underperforming imo. But in case of Junker, yeah you could say he is overperforming and most likely won’t keep this streak going. But very useful stat, I agree.

                  Do you know where to see the big chances sandstorm? Because I can only see big chances missed and big chances created. Or am I just blind?

                  1. Sandstorm
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 14 Years
                    3 years, 9 months ago

                    Good point about total shots / inside the box / big chances.

                    There's PLAYER STATISTICS thingy that I can only see if I enlarge the browser window at computer, haven't seen it in phone. There is ATTACK and in those stats is "Big Chances Missed" but not total number of big chances. Hope that helps!

                    1. ReindeerHotdog
                      • 3 Years
                      3 years, 9 months ago

                      The shots inside and outside of area is going to be difficult if we're only using Sofascore. BUT, as there is mention of how many shots are inside/outside in the team stats for each game, that could give us an indication of who that was.

                      But that wouldn't be accurate enough for me to say it was conclusive.

                      In regards to conversion/chances missed and all of that jazz, I'd be looking to represent that data in regards to multiple aspects of the game. Time played, personal shots/chances, team shots/chances etc... to give an idea of player contribution. I'd also be interested in looking at how many goals a certain player scores AFTER his team takes the lead. So we may have an in-form player but he's only ever got an attack return after his team has taken the lead. Or vice-versa. That would be good to know.

                      There's a lot to mine from that information anyway.

                2. ReindeerHotdog
                  • 3 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  Yes that sounds like a good idea.

                  I've been collating a lot of stats from Sofascore for teams and some players. The issue with players, is there's so many it takes a lot of time.

                  Right now I have everything sorted so as soon as I update the 'round' stats for each fixture, it'll add all that data and total it up, average it out and give me stats that I can instantly look at to compare teams' performances.

                  I'm doing something similar with players. One aspect I'm looking at is minutes played compared with games played in (i.e 334 minutes can be represented as 3.7 lots of 90 minutes, but of course it doesn't represent the total number of games that player has featured in) to better understand player contribution.

                  I'll try to go back as far as I can regarding last season. It would be great if I have information to compare for the same players over that long period of time. At the very least by the end of this season I'll have my own personal collection of all this data, ready to go again for next season.

                  I think it might work better by choosing a team at a time and looking at players of interest as it keeps it nicely tied together. That way if we looked at, say, Brann, we'd be able to see which of the defenders is more or less likely to return specific Fantasy points, even if they are actually playing worse, on average than their peers.

                  It might add some additional insight into how we class what a good player is, how long form lasts, whether or not certain players are over/under-performing and how in-form players and their points compares to or correlates with higher or lower scoring players in more or less successful teams.

                  So for example in the FPL, Greenwood is playing exceptionally well and offers great value. Is that form expected or not? Will it continue? What other factors are involved? Like with ESN, it's only been a few games and so that data is incredibly raw it's hard to digest. But, we can at least look at what information we do have at least and try to draw from it what we can.

                  Something like this I'd take quite seriously and would take my time with so I would like to say I'd be looking at this continually over the next couple of weeks and see what I can do. If the interest is there it's definitely worth doing - but I'd like to give the analysis a good amount of depth rather than it being too superfluous that it's not really that insightful.

                  Another thing is classification of players doesn't mean that every attacking midfielder will operate in the same role. And the same with forwards. The more we understand that, and the more we can differentiate between those kinds of players, the more worth we can derive from those players.

                  It's also going to be interesting to see which players have decent underlying stats but are at poorly-performing teams, or don't get enough game time etc... It could be that we are able to spot some players who if given the chance, might be able to hit some form. "It's been a matter of time with this guy" so to speak.

                  Sorry for the long response - your comment got me excited as you were throwing stats at me. That's always a way to make me happy haha.

                  1. El Puqi
                    • 4 Years
                    3 years, 9 months ago

                    Sounds good. I find all kind of stats very interesting so if you have the time and the interest to put out these player comparisons or whatever you’re going to come up with in the end, I’d happily and gratefully read the articles and discuss the players you find.

                    Keep up the good work, appreciate it! 🙂

              2. jtreble
                • 7 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                FFS has a Comparison Tool.

            7. FPL Dancer
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 7 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              FPL | Rank 36,176 | 2 Chips Left

              Why should you captain Vardy?

              Click on the Link Below!!
              https://youtu.be/k3huQ5-bLxw

            8. El Puqi
              • 4 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              Took a big hit this week.

              Sandberg, Berisha & Berg to Zachariassen, Hauge & Hustad. (-8)

              Decided to abandon my initial plan and forget the attack attack -chip. My forward line wasn’t as good as I wanted. And now was the time to get Hauge. He seems to be playing for Bodo for at least few more rounds and he is a bit of a differential compared to Junker & Zinck.

              So now I’m actually going to use the double captain chip, and it’s between Junker, Zinck & Hauge. Junker and Hauge for now. Junker is more like a ”shield” and then Hauge is that differential pick.

              Zachariassen on his day is one of the best in the league and if Rosenbkrg starts playing well (it looks like it and they have really good fixtures), he’s going to be in the middle of the action, feeding hungry big boys Dino & Borven up top.

              And now after these hits I can focuse on my defence, which is my biggest problem now. Attack looks solid for next couple of weeks, if nothing major happens.

              Good luck all!

              1. ReindeerHotdog
                • 3 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                Think that's totally fair. I'm just not sure I would've taken out Berisha for Hustad is all. Did you do that because of money?

                I am contemplating shifting Sandberg for Zach for -4. I think he would give me a good return on that hit and can his price rising soon.

                Agree on him being one of the best players in the league. He is. If Rosenborg can get their something or other together then he's going to be essential to their charge. RBK have a nice run of fixtures - now might be the time to jump on him.

                Two Captains seems like a good choice for this week. Not many easier fixtures for AAFK and they're ALL in form. So it's a mixture of both those elements. I'd be going for Zinck and Junker but Hauge has the ability to outshine them both.

                Not making any decisions tonight if it doesn't look like Zach will rise but I'll probably bring him in for a hit in the end.

                1. El Puqi
                  • 4 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  Yeah Berisha to Hustad gave me money to do Berg to Hauge. But also I have about 2.3 in the bank now so I can get Eikrem easily if looks necessary (I don’t plan to) but also to get Stolas/Haugen/RBK defender in the coming weeks.

                  I think I said it earlier already but I think it’s worth it.

                  Zinck and Junker is the obvious choice yes but I kinda fancy Hauge to outscore them this week and also he is far less owned so could give a nice boost in OR if he does well.

            9. Paul Psychic Octopus
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 13 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              RHD - I share your pain over captain picks. I wondered what the difference is between my Captain points for the first 6 GWs and what the highest scoring option was. Here were my choices:

              WK1 – James 3pts
              WK2 – Eikrem 3pts
              WK3 – James (didn’t start) 0pts; Eikrem VC 10pts
              WK4 – Junker 5pts
              WK5 – Ibrahimaj 3pts
              WK6 – Zinckernagel 14pts
              WK7 – ??

              Only made one decent call, and got slightly lucky with Eikrem (vc). The Bodo boys were racking the points up in the early weeks, while Borven and Pellegrino ran riot in the middle period.

              My 6 captain picks garnered an extra 38 points. Had someone made the best choice each time of the Zinck-Junker-Borven-Pellegrino quadrangle, they would have got an extra 93 points. That's a big difference, after just 6 GWs, and shows how captains distort the game.

              1. ReindeerHotdog
                • 3 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                Ouch. That's painful.

                And it does certainly distort the game. There's obviously an element of skill to every aspect of this game. Of course there is. But captaincy is indeed a lottery. Eikrem can't score every single game.

                This is where I think perma-captaincy is probably the most logical way to approach this. If you think Eikrem will get 135 points - just always captain him so you know you'll get that again.

                I didn't want to include any kind of mention of tactics for picking a captain as I think that's a completely different article. Didn't feel like getting into that kind of thing.

                But it's a part of the game which can certainly make you feel like all you do is make the wrong choice every week, or it can result in you feeling great about the fact you got it right and see your OR jump. I personally do not like it whatsoever - even when I see a good points return from it, it does nothing for me. I've been burned so many times in FPL too. (My FPL Captain definitely WASN'T Rashford this week, no, not at all).

              2. Lets Talk About 19 Baby
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 9 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                My captains have been the following:
                GW 1 James 6 pts
                GW 2 Zachariassen 2 pts
                GW 3 Koomson 4 pts
                GW 4 Zinckernagel 4 pts
                GW 5 Eikrem 10 pts
                GW 6 Eikrem 2 Pts
                As you can see, my captain picks have been woeful.
                Thinking about double captain, Have Zinckernagel J Hauge Junker. The way my season is going, im sure to pick the wrong one.

                1. ReindeerHotdog
                  • 3 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  It does seem like B/G players are safest. Zinckernagel could easily be a permanent captain. I might run with that for a bit.

                  One of the most heavily involved players in the league, on pens, playing for the best team in the league who love scoring goals.

                  It's a numbers game - plus, you get more luck going with the same player rather than guessing each week.

                  It's a part of the game I'm not a fan of but isn't going anywhere!

                2. Lets Talk About 19 Baby
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 9 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  Update to my captaincy this week gameweek 7. Own Zinckernagel Hauge Junker. Yes you guessed it, I captained Junker for his 2 pts. Ive got to laugh at this Eliteserien game.

            10. Eytexi
              • 5 Years
              3 years, 9 months ago

              1FT done: Ohi to Børven. OR: 1.1k, 0.0m ITB.

              Personally feel there's little to be gained taking a hit for a defender so am holding Gregersen & hoping Nakkim fights through his "arm brake". I'm looking to bring in Pedersen & Sørmo, but neither are particularly inviting this week for -4.

              Klaesson;
              Solheim, Daland, Nakkim (Foss);
              Edvardsen, Eikrem, Pelle, Hauge, Zinck (K);
              Børven, Junker.

              1. El Puqi
                • 4 Years
                3 years, 9 months ago

                Really solid team. Got all the big hitters really.

                Wouldn’t take a hit for a defender either.

                Good luck!

                1. Eytexi
                  • 5 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  Cheers man, best of luck!

              1. MTPockets
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  Borven could be on the wing. Pellegrino/Aasbak unsure.

                • Eytexi
                  • 5 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  Foss doesn't appear nailed either. That's Gregersen, Nakkim, Foss & Pellegrino all doubtful/injured for me, but still honestly nothing I want to do for a hit.

                  1. MTPockets
                      3 years, 9 months ago

                      Aasbak/Pellegrino/Foss for me. Sandberg out was the only real consideration, but still unsure for whom. And want to monitor Borven this week for potential transfer in next gw.

                • TAT
                  • 6 Years
                  3 years, 9 months ago

                  I need a Gregersen replacement. Preferably I'd want a cheaper defender (with a Pelegrino transfer in mind), but looking at the options, there's not that many to choose from. I'd get Sørmo if I didn't already own Hopmark. Suggestions?

                  1. MTPockets
                      3 years, 9 months ago

                      Solheim, Brann defender?

                      1. TAT
                        • 6 Years
                        3 years, 9 months ago

                        I'm already on triple Stabæk unfortunately. Most of the Brann defenders cost more than Gregersen though, but I guess cheaper options are few.

                        1. MTPockets
                            3 years, 9 months ago

                            There's Kolskogen but he's not certain to start:
                            https://twitter.com/Jotjar/status/1281904002750447616
                            Fredriksen? But not the best game this week

                            1. TAT
                              • 6 Years
                              3 years, 9 months ago

                              Think I need a certain starter, but he's one to keep an eye on!

                      2. El Puqi
                        • 4 Years
                        3 years, 9 months ago

                        There are not many in that price point.

                        Solheim and Kolskogen are good options but not cheaper.

                        Sormo is by far the best option, even if you already have Hopmark. Heggheim or Vogt at 4.0 are good for really cheap. Tonnesen at 4.5 takes FK’s and corners if I remember correctly but plays for Start. Näsberg at 4.6 is decent. I’d keep an eye on Overaas at 4.5. Started last game as a RB instead of Solheim.

                        Aasbak at 5.1 is solid but also plays for KBK.

                        That’s it really... Sormo the best one imo.

                        1. TAT
                          • 6 Years
                          3 years, 9 months ago

                          Is Heggheim likely to be a regular starter? Viking is a team I've hardly looked at for this season, but I see that Heggheim is already on 11 points, with two games played.

                          I already own Daland, so another Start defender won't be an option I think. And Vogt/Øveraas would have been an option if I wasn't already maxed out on Stabæk options. Looking through the list (again), it looks like I'm left with picking a more expensive option, or a KBK double-up/Näsberg. Probably leaning towards the latter right now.

                          1. El Puqi
                            • 4 Years
                            3 years, 9 months ago

                            He should be but probs going to miss a game or two as he is still very young.

                            Sormo it is! The best at that price point.

                            1. TAT
                              • 6 Years
                              3 years, 9 months ago

                              I'm a bit cautious of double/triple-ups from mid-table teams, but I guess it might be worth the risk. I will have to play both Hopmark and Sørmo this weekend, if I go through with that transfer. And Sandberg, Hanche-Olsen and Edvardsen in the same fixture.

                              1. Eytexi
                                • 5 Years
                                3 years, 9 months ago

                                Who are your other defenders?

                                1. TAT
                                  • 6 Years
                                  3 years, 9 months ago

                                  These are my defenders before making any transfers:
                                  Daland, Hanche-Olsen, Hopmark, Gregersen and Bojang

                                  Want to get rid of Bojang too, but he'll be last on my bench until I'm able to.

                                  1. El Puqi
                                    • 4 Years
                                    3 years, 9 months ago

                                    Greg to Kolskogen this week and Bojang to Sormo next week or the week after? Brann has good fixtures in the next 3.

                                    1. TAT
                                      • 6 Years
                                      3 years, 9 months ago

                                      That's an option for sure, but I won't be able to get Pellegrino if I make those moves. My initial thinking for this gameweek was to do Hanche-Olsen+Gregersen to 4.0 def+Pellegrino. But With Gregersen out for a while(?), I need to prioritise that transfer, I think.

                                  2. Eytexi
                                    • 5 Years
                                    3 years, 9 months ago

                                    I'd just start Daland tbh.

                                    1. TAT
                                      • 6 Years
                                      3 years, 9 months ago

                                      Daland is in my starting eleven at the moment, alongside Hanche and Hopmark. Rest of the team is:

                                      Sandberg
                                      (defs)
                                      Salétros - J Hauge - Wolff Eikrem - Zinckernagel - Edvardsen
                                      Børven - Junker

                                      1. Eytexi
                                        • 5 Years
                                        3 years, 9 months ago

                                        Defensive issues aside, that's a really nice team. I'm starting Solheim, Daland & Nakkim: not ideal but can't see any better alternatives for a hit. Prefer Daland to double KBK this week, especially as a fellow Edvardsen owner.

                                        1. TAT
                                          • 6 Years
                                          3 years, 9 months ago

                                          Yeah, double KBK+ triple Stabæk is a lot of eggs in the same basket. Still haven't made a transfer, but Gregersen to a playing 4.0 could free up some funds to get Pelegrino either this GW or the next.

                                          I expect Mjøndalen will get a decent amount of CS this season, so I'm tempted by bringing in a Mjøndalen def at some point. That could be Nakkim.

                              2. El Puqi
                                • 4 Years
                                3 years, 9 months ago

                                Yeah fair, not ideal.

                                Me and many others think that Kristiansund will be a top 5 team this season. Statistically they have been very good so far.

                                Good luck with your choices.

                                1. TAT
                                  • 6 Years
                                  3 years, 9 months ago

                                  Thanks! I'll likely leave it late before deciding between Sørmo or other options. Might have to play the WC soon too, to change a few things.

                                2. ReindeerHotdog
                                  • 3 Years
                                  3 years, 9 months ago

                                  Only teams I see ahead of them are Bodo, Molde, Rosenborg and probably Brann.

                                  I'd say Mjondalen but not convinced they've the firepower up top to get enough wins.

                                  I'm sure Viking and Haugesund will pick up but they're streets behind what I've seen from Brann.

                                  But yes, I agree with the fact KBK will have a good season. More than happy with my Sormo/Hopmark double up.

                                  1. TAT
                                    • 6 Years
                                    3 years, 9 months ago

                                    I like KBK, and I won't be surprised if they finish quite high on the table. But it will be tight between those spots. Clean sheets are less predictable in Eliteserien though, so I'm always vary of a double-up. That being said, I have a Stabæk def double-up now.

                                    Ended up bringing in Heggheim for Gregersen. The funds can be used to get Pellegrino.

                      3. Team Cruel
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 8 Years
                        3 years, 9 months ago

                        Dish out the extra money for Thomassen

                        1. TAT
                          • 6 Years
                          3 years, 9 months ago

                          Could do that, but it certainly limits my options for the upcoming Hanche/Edvardsen > cheap def+ Pellegrino transfer. If there are no price rises, and do Gregersen > Thomassen, I can only get a 4.2 or less def as a Hanche replacement.

                    • Paul Psychic Octopus
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 13 Years
                      3 years, 9 months ago

                      Any more specific news on Ostensen? Knee injury I think and may not be too good a prognosis.

                      Looked a great option at 5.0m and scoring in the first game. But now...? Would require a bit of a reshuffle as not much else in that bargain basement price bracket.

                      Allows you to play 3-5-2, but prevents you playing Attack! Attack!

                      1. ReindeerHotdog
                        • 3 Years
                        3 years, 9 months ago

                        Another budget forward I'd be looking at is Lauritsen or Bakenga. They're a bit more but if one of them or both in fact, nail a starting place at Odd they could become good value for money.

                        Hustad at Brann is a good enabler - 4.5m and he plays (only in cameo really) but he could get extra minutes. Allows you to go big elsewhere.

                    • ReindeerHotdog
                      • 3 Years
                      3 years, 9 months ago

                      Bit the bullet and brought in Zach for Sandberg - 4. Thinks it's a good sub for this week and the next few. Can see those points being earned back quite soon.

                      Next on chopping block will be Berisha unless his stats improve. Ironically last game he was very good paper but still, end product is what I want from a 9m forward.

                      Good luck with your captains/final picks.

                      49 minutes to go.

                    • TAT
                      • 6 Years
                      3 years, 9 months ago

                      Is Edvardsen > Pellegrino worth a hit, even though Pellegrino is doubtful?

                      1. ReindeerHotdog
                        • 3 Years
                        3 years, 9 months ago

                        I like Edvardsen. Obviously between the two Pelle is better putting money aside.

                        Pelle is like injured one week then comes back the next and hauls.

                        Doing a hit for a doubtful player feels like a wrong move but I don't see Stabaek doing much against Kristiansund.

                        Nobody else you could bring in?

                        1. TAT
                          • 6 Years
                          3 years, 9 months ago

                          I've had my eyes on Pelle for several gameweeks now, but I've had no way of bringing him in. For a hit I could do that – but I could also just play Edvardsen and bring in Pelle for free next GW.

                          1. ReindeerHotdog
                            • 3 Years
                            3 years, 9 months ago

                            Fair. I'm hugely put off by the fact he's made of glass.

                            Even just by looking at him. He's so thin I always wince whenever anyone is near him.

                            But yes, I know, he's very effective. Hopefully he can get an injury-free run soon.

                            1. TAT
                              • 6 Years
                              3 years, 9 months ago

                              I ended up saving the transfer instead. It gives me the oportunity to see how he plays / if he plays this game, and then decide before the next deadline if I want to bring him in.

                              1. ReindeerHotdog
                                • 3 Years
                                3 years, 9 months ago

                                Think that's the more logical approach. We're dealing with such limited information it's hard to know what's actually going on.

                                1. TAT
                                  • 6 Years
                                  3 years, 9 months ago

                                  True. If he plays and looks alright this GW, it's an easy move for next GW. Other transfers might be necessary to make instead too, injuries/form depending.

                              2. TAT
                                • 6 Years
                                3 years, 9 months ago

                                Edit: not saving the transfer. Not going through with the hit!

                    • Mince n Tatties
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 10 Years
                      3 years, 9 months ago

                      Molde

                      1 Andreas Christopher Linde
                      2 Martin Bjørnbak
                      11 Martin Skjelbreid Ellingsen
                      25 John Shuguto Kitolano
                      27 Marcus Holmgren Pedersen
                      7 Magnus Wolff Eikrem
                      16 Etzaz Muzafar Hussain
                      17 Fredrik Aursnes
                      10 Leke Samson James
                      22 Ola Brynhildsen
                      23 Eirik Ulland Andersen

                    • Mince n Tatties
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 10 Years
                      3 years, 9 months ago

                      Haugesund

                      1 Helge Valvatne Sandvik
                      5 Benjamin Tiedemann Hansen
                      15 Ulrik Tillung Fredriksen
                      19 Mikkel Desler Puggaard
                      23 Thore Baardsen Pedersen
                      6 Joakim Våge Nilsen KAPTEIN
                      10 Niklas Sandberg
                      16 Bruno Miguel Santos Leite
                      9 Benjamin Kallman
                      11 Alexander Ballegaard Ammitzbøll
                      99 Kristoffer Velde

                    • Sandstorm
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 14 Years
                      3 years, 9 months ago

                      My team:

                      Klaesson
                      Pereira, Thomassen, Sørmo
                      Zinckernagel (C), Berg, Sandberg, Wolff Eikrem (VC), Salétros
                      Junker, Børven

                      Haug, Bringaker, Vogt, Desler

                      Zinc (C), Eikrem (VC). Urghh.
                      Salétros gets a start.

                      Good luck to all!

                      ps. Reindeerhotdog, I've read your long post a couple of times, very interesting stuff, I must get back to you.

                      1. ReindeerHotdog
                        • 3 Years
                        3 years, 9 months ago

                        Myhra
                        Kristiansen, Hopmark, Sormo;
                        Zinckernagel (k), Zachariassen, Hauge, Koomson;
                        Berisha, Borven, Junker (k)
                        -4

                        Klaesson, Edvardsen, Hanche-Olsen, Daland

                        Double captain (seemed appropriate due to this post). Really happy with my team right now. Happy for the hit. Even if Sandberg and Zachariassen score equally this week I think Zach outscores him next few and has a better fixture this week.

                        Next thing to do is Kristiansen out if he still doesn't look like he's going to be as involved as other cheaper/slightly more expensive alternatives. I'll look to drop Berisha to reinforce other parts of squad.

                        Oh and Myhra is in as I see save points in that game. I think Mjondalen will probably beat Valerenga but have few shots so Klaesson probably won't be involved too much.

                        Now watch the exact opposite of all of that happen! Enjoy people.

                      2. ReindeerHotdog
                        • 3 Years
                        3 years, 9 months ago

                        (responding to the p.s - oki doke!)

                    • ReindeerHotdog
                      • 3 Years
                      3 years, 9 months ago

                      If one of Brynhildsen or Ulland Andersen starts getting regular games they're in my team for sure. That Molde midfield is a minefield.

                      1. MTPockets
                          3 years, 9 months ago

                          UEA was great for a period across 17-18. Just injury prone then absorbed into the Molde squad

                          1. MTPockets
                              3 years, 9 months ago

                              *EUA

                            • ReindeerHotdog
                              • 3 Years
                              3 years, 9 months ago

                              Yeah he seems to be on the fringes. It's a shame for sure.

                              Molde are so hard to predict. Hopefully at the halfway stage we'll have a clear pattern and see who is going to get the minutes. Really thought Ola was going to be a starter, no questions asked.