Scout Notes

Burnley ride luck to latest clean sheet as Fulham’s defence impress again

Burnley 0-0 West Bromwich Albion

Bonus: James Tarkowski (£5.3m) x3, Nick Pope (£5.6m) x2, Matt Lowton (£4.5m) x1, Sam Johnstone (£4.5m) x1

Burnley and West Brom played out a goalless draw of some drama and considerably less quality.

Fantasy interest revolved around the Burnley defence.

Keeper Nick Pope (£5.6m) was far and away the most popular player on duty, with his 15.7% ownership handed an eight-pointer from the Clarets’ second clean sheet in three matches.

Some 6.6% of Fantasy Premier League (FPL) bosses earned shut-out points from Ben Mee (£5.1m), back after missing the midweek draw with Fulham following a suspected concussion last weekend.

It was a measure of just how poor the match was that much of the Fantasy talk involved whether Pope would be awarded a save, and therefore a save point, when he only partly blocked a goal-bound effort (he wasn’t), while the 3.7% of managers with Matt Lowton (£4.5m) in their teams were left to bemoan a late booking which clipped his bonus point potential.

But in truth, all those bosses were lucky to bank clean sheet returns at all, let alone moan about a missed point here or there.

Despite being reduced to ten men when VAR rightly persuaded Mike Dean to send off Semi Ajayi (£4.8m) for handball, the Baggies grew into the contest and missed excellent late chances to take all three points from the contest.

That confirmed a key issue point regarding West Brom. Even with Semi detached, manager Sam Allardyce bet the house on a win – surely the shape of things to come if he is to retain his relegation-dodging crown.

Matheus Pereira (£5.4m) was the stand-out attacking threat on the day, with his six attempts and three penalty area touches both match-leading figures.

He played (nominally) just behind lone striker Mbaye Diagne (£6.0m), although frequently ran past him on the break or during their occasional periods in possession – the Baggies had just 30% of that across the entire match.

But both were guilty of missing big chances.

That’s a luxury Allardyce’s men can simply not afford as they head into a decent mini-run involving Brighton and Everton at home during Double Gameweek 26, followed by a visit from Newcastle and a trip to Crystal Palace.

A first clean sheet under Allardyce was reward for the loyalty of the 2.2% of managers who have been living off save points from keeper Sam Johnstone (£4.5m), but his boss was left to rue a missed opportunity:

We are getting better and looking more dangerous and all we have to do at the top end of the pitch is be more clinical with our finishing. But if those performances carry on, then I’m convinced they will turn into wins rather than draws.

Then again, Burnley were unlucky that VAR didn’t intervene regarding a second hand ball incident, this time involving Kyle Bartley (£4.4m) in his own area.

Clarets boss Sean Dyche went for the ‘I’ve seen them given’ line on the incident, before delivering his verdict on a poor performance:

We gave the ball away so many times today. That is mental fatigue. Pitch was poor. The players were off, but we came away with a point and a clean sheet. We know these players can play better than that.

‘Mental fatigue’ is not the best preparation for Double Gameweek 26’s trip to Spurs and a home match with Leicester.

That’s a schedule inspiring indifference, with no Burnley players in the top 30 for transfers-in, and Mee currently the only Claret in the corresponding transfers-out table.

Burnley XI (4-4-2): Pope; C Taylor, Mee, Tarkowski, Lowton; McNeil, Westwood, Cork, Brownhill; Rodriguez (Mumbongo 81), Vydra.

West Brom XI (4-2-3-1): Johnstone; C Townsend, Bartley, Ajayi, Furlong; Yokuslu, Gallagher; M Phillips (O’Shea 32), M Pereira, Maitland-Niles; Diagne. 

Fulham 1-0 Sheffield United

  • Goals: Ademola Lookman (£5.0m)
  • Assists: None
  • Bonus: Lookman x3, Ola Aina (£4.5m) x2, Joachim Andersen (£4.5m) x1

Fulham’s quest to escape relegation – and find some Fantasy relevance – continued to gather momentum with a dour win over fellow strugglers Sheffield United.

The Cottagers are now unbeaten in four matches, and three of those have come with the added bonus of a clean sheet.

That has sparked some belated Fantasy interest in their back line, with keeper Alphonse Areola (£4.5m and 4.0%) the most popular starter across both teams.

But, arguably, it is two of Fulham’s back four who deserve the attention.

Both Ola Aina (£4.5m) and Joachim Andersen (£4.5m) brought in bonus against the Blades, with the former having produced scores of 11, nine and eight over his last three starts, and skipper Andersen’s 9,239 owners enjoying four straight returns, courtesy of those three clean sheets and an assist.

The centre-half was perhaps unlucky not to be handed the assist on Saturday as it was his pass to Ademola Lookman (£5.0m) that led to the winning goal, but the winger’s subsequent engagement with Ethan Ampadu (£4.3m) was deemed another passage of play.

That disappointment aside, both defenders are offering an attacking threat to go with their new-found defensive solidity, which bodes well for a Double Gameweek 26 involving a trip to Crystal Palace and a visit from Spurs – neither of whom are .

It’s persuaded a modest (circa 7,000) amount of managers to invest in Aina thus far, although Fulham’s schedule following that double (Liverpool away, Manchester City at home) is unlikely to lead to a rush on their key assets.

Lookman’s goal was his first attacking return in seven starts. He’s been a lively presence this season – his 52 attempts has been eclipsed by only five other midfielders, but his goal conversion rate of 7.7% is bettered by more than 80.

Sheffield United, meanwhile, continue to plough a consistently awful furrow, not helped by a terrible run of injuries, with Chris Basham (£4.6m) the latest victim.

One of the mainstays of last year’s superb defence, he started in midfield at Craven Cottage before manager Chris Wilder moved him into a back five after 30 minutes to help counter Fulham’s press.

That worked for a while, only for Basham to succumb to a hamstring issue after the break, leading Wilder to deliver this post-match verdict:

Basham has done his hamstring. He’s the fittest professional in club by a country mile. The record that we have had is ridiculous, only two or three players who have not had injuries this season, which is incredible. We’ll wait ’til we get home to Sheffield and see what the state is.

The state of the Blades’ league campaign is woeful indeed – they’re 14 points adrift of 17th-placed Newcastle.

And their lack of Fantasy appeal is perfectly summed up by their most popular player Rhian Brewster (£4.4m). His 6.4% ownership is entirely down to his cut-price as he’s played just four minutes of the last four Gameweeks.

A Double Gameweek 26 involving visits from Liverpool and Aston Villa isn’t likely to tempt Fantasy managers into buying him or his team-mates.

Fulham XI (4-4-2): Areola; A Robinson, Andersen, Adarabioyo, Aina; Reed, Anguissa; Lookman (De Cordova-Reid 90′), Loftus-Cheek, Cavaleiro (Tete 78); Maja. 

Sheffield Utd XI (3-5-2): Ramsdale; K Bryan, Ampadu, Jagielka (Bogle 80); Basham (Norwood 51), Stevens, Fleck, Lundstram (McGoldrick 74), Baldock; McBurnie, Sharp.

1,822 Comments Post a Comment
  1. FULLSERVICECOVER
    • 9 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    highest scorer in the double?
    A.watkins
    B. periera(wba)

    1. Sun Jihai
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      A

    2. thegaffer82
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Watkins surely

      1. FULLSERVICECOVER
        • 9 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        usually,but what can i say im a sucker for home fixtures. periera has 2,watkins away twice so makes it trickier.

  2. lilmessipran
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Best gw to bb if you are wildcarding this gw?

    1. Holmes
      • 10 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      maybe 30/31

    2. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Not sure. All feels a bit late now really.

  3. Scots Gooner
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Foden is a waste of City spot right?

    1. Holmes
      • 10 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      yep

    2. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Not ideal at all.

    3. thegaffer82
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      At this moment in time, he is definitely a waste of a City spot.

      Gundo becoming a 5-star attacking mid whilst KDB has also come back from injury has hurt Foden's prospects a lot

  4. Champions League Varane
    • 5 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    BB active FH available .9 ITB no FT best replacements for Bamford and Raphina?

    Martinez Areola
    Stones Dias Elmo Ricardo Shaw
    Bruno Salah Gundogan Barnes Raphina
    Bamford DCL Kane

    1. Catastrophe
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Watkins, Lookman perhaps?

      1. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
        • 7 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        This

    2. thegaffer82
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Bam > Watkins & maybe keep Raph as he has a decent fixture and is one of the in-form MFers in the game right now

    3. Pep's Money Laundry
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Their replacements will probably be from teams that are less attacking with no form, eg Watkins or Traore maybe Pereira of wba

      I would stick with one of your Leeds players at the least

  5. FULLSERVICECOVER
    • 9 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    usually,but what can i say im a sucker for home fixtures. periera has 2,watkins away twice so makes it trickier

    1. FULLSERVICECOVER
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      reply fail lol

  6. King Kohli
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Rate these in the order you would have them on a WC?

    Digne
    R.Pereira
    Watkins
    Maddison

    1. Catastrophe
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Maddison's injured isn't he? I would say Barnes -> Digne/Watkins -> Pereira

      1. King Kohli
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Already have Barnes, looking to get two of above mentioned.
        Tempted by Digne and Pereira in a 442.

        1. Catastrophe
          • 13 Years
          3 years, 2 months ago

          Difficult to know without seeing your Team. Probably Digne and Watkins, I still think the latter is a solid option and both should have the extra DGW unlike Leicester.

          1. King Kohli
            • 11 Years
            3 years, 2 months ago

            Quite certain on this core for my WC. Keeping my options open for all other positions.

            Martinez
            Cancelo Stones
            Salah Bruno Barnes Gundo
            Kane DCL

            1. Captain Kakaroto (I blame R…
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 6 Years
              3 years, 2 months ago

              I have a similar team to you with 2 ft

              I am leaning towards 4-5-1
              * will bring in
              Martinez
              Dias Stones * Pereira * Digne
              Bruno Salah Gundo Son Barnes
              DCL

              I Will bench Watkins if I am going for it. another option is to transfer out 1 of the city defense as i believe they will get 1 game each.

    2. FULLSERVICECOVER
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      1 2 4 3

      1. King Kohli
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Cheers mate.
        Those fullbacks are basically oop midfielders atm!

    3. aapoman
      • 10 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Tough one. That is propably the order. Watkins gets maybe higher if Grealish is fit. Barnes is better than Maddison imo and would be at the top of that list.

    4. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Did you see that Moeen Ali ball the other day?

    5. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      I think Watkins has no competition. He's the best budget DGW forward with a fixture in GW29. Hard to compare with those other guys who are very different types of assets.

  7. b91jh
    • 6 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Expected points from these in your opinion?

    A) Ricardo (ARS, bur, bha, SHU)
    B) Digne (SOU, wba, che, BUR, possibly avl)
    C) Dallas (AVL, whu, CHE)

    1. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      A 17
      B 21
      C 5

    2. Sun Jihai
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      14
      16
      9

  8. SomeoneKnows
    • 8 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Martinez (Pope)
    Cancelo, Stones, Dallas (Coufal, Douglas)
    Salah, Bruno, Son, Gundogan (Grealish*)
    DCL, Bamford, Ings

    Ings + Pope > Kane + Forster

    Yay or Nay?

    1. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Neigh.

  9. FPL_BUCCANEER
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 4 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    On a WC:
    (Planning on keeping Cancelo and Gundo..)

    A) Dias, Salah
    B) Digne, Sterling

    1. Catastrophe
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      B based on form but due to ownership I would say A is the safest option. I'm keeping hold of Salah for now (and Fernandes, Son)

  10. Catastrophe
    • 13 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Help appreciated chaps, 1 FT, 0 ITB and on BB.

    A) Ings & Raphinha -> Watkins & Barnes
    B) Ings & Dallas -> DCL & Keane
    C) Ings & Dallas -> Watkins & Digne
    D) Ings & Bamford -> DCL & Watkins

    Going through each fixture these could all result in very similar overall points (assumes EVE and AVL DGW28). Currently thinking A as I think Barnes looks a better option than DCL and Watkins a better option than Everton defence. Don't really fancy Ings as City away in DGW27 is barely a fixture, Bamford not great either but he will be on my bench for 27 and 28.

    Martinez*, Sanchez
    Dias*, Stones*, Shaw*, Konsa*, Dallas
    Salah*, Fernandes*, Son*, Gundogan*, Raphinha
    Kane*, Ings, Bamford

    Cheers!

    1. Easy Cheesy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      What happens if everton don’t double in gw28? Ings does have shu in his double so selling is tricky

  11. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
    • 7 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Pick one for 26 (activating BB):

    A) Areola (CRY + TOT)
    B) Johnstone (BHA + EVE)

    1) Raphinha + Maja
    2) Jorginho + Bamford

    1. Catastrophe
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      A, 1

    2. luk46
      • 5 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      A 1, easy

  12. DannyDrinkVodka
    • 4 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    No FH and would take a -12 to get me to the below, which is v close to WC template:

    Martinez
    Cancelo Stones Shaw
    Salah Bruno Son Gundog
    Kane DCL Watkins

    Forster Raphinha Dallas Coufal

    Should I push the WC button?

    1. BrockLanders
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      12 warrants WC imo

    2. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      I would WC and sell Salah for KDB, get in Digne & R.Pereira and get a bench of cheap players that have a game in 29

  13. DA Minnion (Former great)
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Martinez
    Mee Stones Shaw
    Gundogan Son Bruno Barnes
    Kane Dcl Bamford

    Raphinha Dallas Coufal Forster

    Could get above for minus 4 by getting rid of Grealish and Ings for Barnes and Dcl
    Triple captain Kane/Bruno
    Thoughts lad's. Would that be enough for double game week.
    Still have wildcard too.

    1. Catastrophe
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Grealish & Ings -> Barnes & DCL should more than pay off.

    2. mr messi
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Looks good, similar to my plan

  14. luk46
    • 5 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    would you bb this?

    Pope Bamford Dallas Coufal

    I think its not really worth it personally, but kinda wanna get it out of the way...

    1. Catastrophe
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Probably yes - Coufal may be worth a hit.

    2. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Yes. Best to get it out of the way. I will BBing with this:

      Areola Raphinha Struijk Vestergaard

    3. Gandalf
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Yeh want to get it out of the way also. Trying to figure out if Coufal > Konsa worth a hit

  15. OleGGMU
    • 5 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Hi lads
    looking for a bit of transfer advice

    Current XI
    Pope
    Mee, Shaw, Dias, Targett
    Grealish, Madders, Bruno, Gundo
    DCL, Kane
    Bench : Mendy, Raphinha, Bamford, Dallas
    6.6 ITB
    2ft
    which would you do: (Alternatives are welcome)
    A) Greal + Pope+ Mee ----> Salah, Ederson, Perreira/Digne (442)
    B)Greal + Pope + Raph --> Son + Ederson + Barnes (352)
    C) Greal + Pope + Raph --> KDB + Martinez + Barnes (352)

    Any help will be greatly appreciated lads

    1. CONNERS
      • 5 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      I like the look of C.

      1. OleGGMU
        • 5 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Cheers mate for the reply, any alternative moves i may have overlooked?

  16. Rupert The Horse
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Sniff sniff sniff. New article whiff.

    1. Don Kloppeone
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Can't believe there hasn't been one tbh

      Most disappointing 😉

      1. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Yeah wtf? Now I look like a silly horse. Suits me though.

  17. Connor's Calling
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Sterling or KDB on WC?

    1. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      KDB sounds like fun.

    2. aapoman
      • 10 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      KDB. Have had Sterling since KDB got injured and I've felt nothing but sadness.

    3. Botman and Robben
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      KDB

    4. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      KDB

  18. Botman and Robben
    • 7 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    1FT, 2.5ITB

    Bamford -> DCL? Yay or Nay?

    Martinez
    Dias Stones Mee
    Gundogan Bruno Salah Son
    Ings Watkins Bamford

    Pope Raphinha Dallas Bednarek

    1. aapoman
      • 10 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Yeasy move yes

    2. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Definitely

    3. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Yes

    4. Botman and Robben
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Cheers all

    5. Don Kloppeone
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Yayy

  19. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
    • 7 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Expected points from these in 26:

    Areola (CRY, TOT)
    Raphinha (AVL)
    Struijk (AVL)
    Vestergaard (EVE)

    1. Easy Cheesy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Is this for a BB? I’d say 15

      1. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
        • 7 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Yes for BB

    2. Botman and Robben
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      8
      7
      2
      2

      1. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
        • 7 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        So that's practically 15 points if I take a hit and BB. Worth it?

        1. Botman and Robben
          • 7 Years
          3 years, 2 months ago

          That estimation is on the high side that the keeper keeps a CS against palace and Raph gets a return. Don't think it is really worth it.

          1. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
            • 7 Years
            3 years, 2 months ago

            Ok Thanks!

    3. JONALDINHO
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      8, 6, 2, 2.

    4. OLEgend
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      9
      5
      2
      1

  20. thegaffer82
    • 12 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    After the Villa 'leak' scandal, I wonder if players will be banned from playing FPL (rather like they aren't allowed to gamble on footy)? Or maybe there will a transfer embargo on transferring out players from their FPL squad who they know to be injured as it's their teammate?

    I honestly do think though, the main 'leak' came from Villa posting pictures of their players training with Grealish nowhere to be seen...

    1. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      That’s the only reason I knew to bench him.

  21. Tshelby
    • 9 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Thoughts? Gealish to Barnes today cause the one will go up in price and the other one will drop probably
    My current team:
    2ft - 0.0 itb

    Martinez
    Shaw, Dias, Mee, Coufal, Dallas
    Grealish, Salah, Bruno, sterling, Gundogan
    Watkins, Antonio, Bamford

    1. Don Kloppeone
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Grealish, Sterling, Antonio > Kane, Barnes, Maddison (if fit) works?
      A bit maverick perhaps

      1. Tshelby
        • 9 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Losing Sterling before a DGW? Mmm don't know but it looks like a fun move

        1. Don Kloppeone
          • 6 Years
          3 years, 2 months ago

          It then frees up a spot for KDB when you're ready at least ...

  22. Don Kloppeone
    • 6 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Weighing up my early options ahead of DGW26 - would appreciate your views!
    I have TC and WC left - planning on TC this week and WC in 30/31.

    A) Ings, Bamford, Son > Kane, Watkins, Barnes (-8) - drop Son
    B) Ings, Pope > Kane, fodder (-4) - Kane + Son double up
    C) Ings, Son, Coufal > Kane, Barnes, Targett (-8) - play 442 and bench 3x LEE
    D) Ings, Raphinha > Barnes, Watkins (-4) - no Kane, stick with Son

    1FT 1.3itb
    Martinez
    Dias, Stones, Shaw
    Salah, Bruno, Gundo, Son, Raphinha
    DCL, Ings
    (Pope) (Bamford, Dallas, Coufal)

    Cheers!

    1. Tshelby
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      B because it's only a -4 and D has Watkins in it. I know I have him but don't really think he's a great shout

      1. Don Kloppeone
        • 6 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Hmmm thanks - that's my least favourite option because it doesn't capitalise on LEI mids hot form!

    2. OLEgend
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      B

      1. Don Kloppeone
        • 6 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Cheers

        It's very tough because it really is fixtures vs form

        Spurs looking awful but with great fixtures so could warrant the double up
        LEI mids on red hot form but slightly worse fixtures....

        1. OLEgend
          • 9 Years
          3 years, 2 months ago

          Burnley nand Fulham aren't that bad defensively. That's my reason and the form Spurs are in now..

        2. OLEgend
          • 9 Years
          3 years, 2 months ago

          Oh wait I meant C the one with Barnes in. sorry

          1. Don Kloppeone
            • 6 Years
            3 years, 2 months ago

            These two both have Barnes:

            A) Ings, Bamford, Son > Kane, Watkins, Barnes (-8)
            B) Ings, Son, Coufal > Kane, Barnes, Targett (-8)

            A gets in Watkins. B means keeping all three Leeds (benching this week) but gets Targett

  23. Elly88 > KTR (Kevin The …
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    In DGWKs 26 and 27 how many games do we expect the following to play

    A. Dias - 4/4?
    B. Cancelo - 3/4?
    C. Stones - 3/4?

    1. Easy Cheesy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      I’d agree with that. As a cancelo owner I’d be happy w three matches

      1. Elly88 > KTR (Kevin The …
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        I am definitely going to do Cancelo > Dias for -4. It is a long-term decision so doing it this week is the best time as I have the chance to recoup the hit. I really want to maximize on the city cleanies given that they have the best defense.

        I do it or just pass?

    2. Pep's Money Laundry
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Cancelo might get 2, otherwise agree

      1. Elly88 > KTR (Kevin The …
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Not Stones because he was benched just the other day right?

    3. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Yep I think you have it right.

      Because of CL, I think that the games missed will likely be the first game of GW26.

      1. Elly88 > KTR (Kevin The …
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Also take into account Cancelo has previously had minutes managed which could be useful when he is hauled at 63' but bad if it is a cameo.

  24. AlleRed
    • 6 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Apologies if this has been asked, but why are people saying WC31 and not WC30? If I dead end into 29, will I be able to survive 30 without WC30? Cheers

    1. istanbul05
      • 10 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      bigger fixture swing in GW31

    2. Sun Jihai
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Fixture swings biggest from 31
      Players who you have in 29 will have generally decent fixtures in 30 e.g. TOT have NEW, AVL have FUL, LEE have SHU. Whereas in 31 the same teams have MUN, LIV and MCI.

    3. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      The fixtures in GW30 are very nice for the teams that play in 29.

      Villa play FUL
      Spurs play new
      Leeds play SHU

      So you're basically not looking to WC and offload them for that week. 31 on the other hand swings fixtures in favor of Liverpool, Wolves, Arsenal and a few others.

      1. AlleRed
        • 6 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Thanks all!

    4. Kabayan
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Most will have AVL/LEE/FUL. They still have good fixtures in 30.

  25. OLEgend
    • 9 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Am I the only one stuck with Richarlison and have to keep him for a few weeks now?

    1. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      There are far worse people to be 'stuck with'.

  26. sk24
    • 6 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    I'm looking at -4 for Ings, Bamford > Kane, DCL. Would you go -8 for Dallas to Keane?
    Would give me 14 dgwers and Raphinha for BB

  27. aapoman
    • 10 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Too risky to not have Kane on a wc? Feel like my team would be great without him eating up so much funds.

    1. OLEgend
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Iam taking the risk

  28. jdogg
    • 12 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    A Son antonio ings To barnes dcl and kane -8

    Or

    B raphinha and ings to barnes and dcl -4?

  29. Ziko7
    • 4 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    I'm benchboosting this week. Would you take a -12 hit and sell Mitchell, Coufal, Bernardo Silva and Ings for Aina, Castagne, Gundogan and Kane. The other option is just to take a -4 and sell Mitchell and Coufal.

    1. Pep's Money Laundry
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      No point BB if it's going to cost you 12 points

      Go got the 2nd option

    2. thegaffer82
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      That’s not a BB squad at all - and taking a -12 to make it a bb squad kind of negates the benefit

      1. Ziko7
        • 4 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        why not? going for Fulham defender now allows me an additional player in GW29, same for Kane.