C has great away form so that's just silly.

Toney is the obvious choice but need to catch up and MacAllister has a high ceiling

Nah too lazy

You are deluding yourself Rupert if you think news and opinion are separate. Try watching the same story coverage on BBC, ITV, RTE and C4. There are clear political inferences made on each channel and commentators brought in to advocate for particular point of views.

"BBC employees are meant to be impartial and not get involved in political rants on social media."

Tell that to Alan Sugar.

Impartiality is only an issue when it affects the jackboot philosophy of the Tory government.

Why is Alan Sugar allowed to attack Labour, Corbyn and the unions on twitter then? He’s even been racist.

He works for the BBC, never apologised or been suspended.

Let’s not forget the BBC boss arranging £800k loans for Boris and donating to the party.

Your argument doesn’t stand up.

He works on a freelance basis and said something controversial on Twitter. The BBC has employed lots of people who have said controversial stuff on Twitter. The director general of the BBC has donated lots of money to the Conservatives and has helped Boris Johnson out financially, which doesn't seem very impartial to me. The Tories' policies on asylum seekers are inhumane and won't work.

Do your research before you allow your dislike for an individual to cloud your understanding of the situation. The impartiality only applies to those working for BBC news services, it’s a lot more wish-washy and unclear for others hence the Alan Sugar comments etc. Comments about the Qatar human rights breaches were allowed by BBC employees so why not other subjects as well? Whether you agree with GL or not, the disturbing fact that members of the Tory party have pressurised the BBC to remove an individual they regard as n opponent demonstrates a complete lack of impartiality. The worry now is that this escalates into something that could even go so far as affecting games with players threatening to make a moral stand.

And long may the backfire continue.

The BBC is not a 'Tory' organisation (quite the opposite in fact). People are simply stating that it is meant to be neutral and that the BBC has guidelines on social media use. Of course this needs to be applied to all people working for it.

I think Lineker is stupid. If he wants to rant about political issues instead of football, then pursue a political career where that is allowed or encouraged.

From a licence fee payer standpoint, I think it is outrageous he is paid so much by the BBC (and by Qatari TV in the World Cup, while at the same time slagging off that country as well). He has no apparent talent off the football pitch and the BBC should redeploy his over-inflated salary to waive the licence fee to elderly people who cannot afford it. They are more deserving than this odious, tax-dodging hypocrite is.

Just discussing the merit. I don’t talk about politics myself as I have no interest.

I like the way you point fingers at other countries and don't talk about your own countries' ghastly treatment of immigrants.

Thanks

Both OK imo

My gut says B but all the stats suggesting March could go big as neither opponent defend his area well. Then I hear of a knock and it all points towards B but March still on my mind! It’s a tough call

Many thanks

Fantasy football doesn't mean the more expensive player will get you more points!!

Availability does not guarantee he gets played of course

I’m going with MacA

It's been coming since he has been playing a more advanced role.

yes same here. afraid to bench D, unsure about C and B has been good to me all season but A seems the more logical Arsenal player to field this GW.

Agree. Play Darwin this week. Nice differential, could haul. Bench Martinelli.

cheers 😉

Ok. So either Salah or March. But concerned about March’s minutes if he’s carrying a niggle. Salah only plays once but could haul va BOU.

Could bring in Toney for Haaland for free. But not convinced - something is stopping me pressing the button. Am I being daft?