Team Reveals
12 August 2022 513 comments
FPLTrader FPLTrader
Share:

FPL Trader – aka Paulius – is currently ranked 37th in our Hall of Fame and wrote an excellent piece about finding value in pre-seasonHere the three-time top 300 finisher outlines his Gameweek 2 plans and reflects on the decision to play the Bench Boost in Gameweek 1.


A lot of Fantasy Premier League (FPL) decisions simply depend on what kind of manager you are. Personally, I wouldn’t call myself a risk-averse manager. I’m not reckless either but I try not to be swayed by effective ownerships or template teams.

On the contrary, my joy in playing FPL is finding the right moments to move differently from the crowd and, at the same time, gain an edge. I feel that using a Bench Boost in Gameweek 1 is exactly that kind of situation.

Why I played the Bench Boost in Gameweek 1

Firstly, a few reasons why this Bench Boost is related to my style of seeking differential moves:

  • It means the Gameweek 1 squad will be different from the template, as there is a need for the manager to spread funds differently to have a stronger bench.
  • Due to this, you will use your Wildcard at a different time than the majority of others. This is a very important aspect. The success of a Wildcard very much depends on timing, as our perception of the best FPL assets changes over time. So if the Gameweek you activate this chip proves to be the ‘right’ one, you will have lower competition when seeking the top FPL ranks.
  • There will be a different chip strategy later in the season, as others will seek to Wildcard right before using a Double Gameweek Bench Boost. You may even use your Free Hit at a different time. Again, being correct with this chip strategy will mean significant rank increases.

The above points are about increasing your variance and, possibly increasing your chances of winning FPL. However, I think it is perfectly viable that a Bench Boost in Gameweek 1 may have been the optimal strategy:

  • A deep bench allows you to have ‘cash cows’ when extra funds are needed.
  • Having 15 active players increases the probability that you’ve included a price-rising bandwagon that increases your team value, as long as you can manage those that decrease.
  • It’s easier to plan chip strategy for later in the season. For example, you may use a Wildcard in the biggest Double Gameweek rather than just beforehand. In my opinion, managers end up focussing too much on maximizing the Bench Boost, whilst sacrificing other opportunities. This chip will usually score you an extra 15-20 points but it also restricts your decision-making freedom, which could ultimately be worth more in points than that Bench Boost.
  • As the World Cup break has provided an extra window for unlimited transfers, many managers were already planning on using an early Wildcard. Therefore carrying an expensive bench wouldn’t be for long.

Furthermore, there is also the strategy of using Bench Boost in Gameweek 1 and then a Wildcard in Gameweek 2. This allows a fun hybrid of Free Hit and Bench Boost but has the disadvantage of deploying a Wildcard with only one week of information. In this case, I preferred to build an opening Bench Boost squad that can also last for at least a few Gameweeks.

Is such a style for you? You’ll need to be mentally prepared for things going badly, as it’s hard to get online sympathy when you use a strategy that is far different from the consensus. Yet this way of playing brings me the most adrenaline and joy.

How did Gameweek 1 go?

My 15-man squad took home 79 points. Without a playing bench, it would have been 71, which is roughly what the template teams scored. I was unlucky with my bench, as the attacking outfielders had a combined expected goal involvement of 0.80, whilst David Raya (£4.5m) conceded twice from an expected goals conceded (xGC) tally of 0.62.

It should have brought at least one return which, in my eyes, would have made it a successful Bench Boost.

My future plans

I have already moved Mason Mount (£8.0m) and Gabriel Jesus (£8.0m) to Andreas Pereira (£4.5m) and Erling Haaland (£11.6m) for a hit. There was no obvious route to Haaland as I did not think he would start the season so strongly – my initial plan was to move Mount to Phil Foden (£8.0m) for Manchester City coverage.

However, it now seems that he will be the main captain option in several upcoming Gameweeks. You need to find opportunities to be different and I think that going without Haaland is not the right one.



513 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Jet5605
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 3 months ago

    Who to start

    A - Perisic
    B - Andreas

  2. gooberman
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    3 years, 3 months ago

    Just finalising WC team. I always like to include at least one very low owned under the radar pick. That player is Gundogan. Back to full fitness after struggling with a back injury last season and ran the game for City last week and got into a lot of dangerous areas. I also think Pep sees him as a key player to exploit Haaland's main strength's. Allows me to tap into that City attack as well.

    1. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      3 years, 3 months ago

      Might be dropped for Bernardo though.

      Do you have Kulusevski?

  3. gooberman
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    3 years, 3 months ago

    Why would a player who ran the game last week be dropped? Wouldn't make sense. Silva is also on his way out it seems. If Silva does come back into the team it's more likely to be at the expense of either Foden or Grealish. Yes I have Kulu.

    1. @persecuted_by_mods
        3 years, 3 months ago

        Pep doesn't see things that way, otherwise Mahrez would never get dropped when he fits form. Yes I like Weetabix.

        1. Andy_Social
          • 13 Years
          3 years, 3 months ago

          Was going to say the same thing - you just can't read Pep's mind like that. I'd still hesitate on bringing in any midfielder from City unless you want to splurge on KDB.

      • Well you know, Triffic
        • 15 Years
        3 years, 3 months ago

        Bilva may get his City 'testimonial'. Pep's nice like that.

    2. Well you know, Triffic
      • 15 Years
      3 years, 3 months ago

      Actually your bench boost total of 8 points should account for the hit you're having to take in GW2.

      So really your bench boost only scored 4 points.

      😉

      1. out for a goalkick
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        3 years, 3 months ago

        Exactly what I was thinking!

        Plus with all the talk of having different options available - the starting XI now looks very template - with the exception of Toney?

    3. DandyDon
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 3 months ago

      Haha this article, goes into great depth to explain the bold decision to do a gameweek 1 bench boost only to then reveal it only got 8 points! Lol. Maybe should have scrapped the article after that but points for honesty.

    4. Neeskens Under Matip
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      3 years, 3 months ago

      Why can't you sort by difficulty on the fixture ta me anymore?

    5. Neeskens Under Matip
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      3 years, 3 months ago

      Table* or edit comments still