264 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Philosopher's Stones
    • 5 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Thanks for the article, Mr Skonto Rigga.

    1. Skonto Rigga
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      My pleasure!

    2. Sheffield Wednesday
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Yes, thank you. I can't see the breakdown but for GW17-25, table bonus points were earned in 3 out of every 8 table bonus matches.

      1. Sheffield Wednesday
        • 5 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        ... also 3 out of eight of those matches that resulted in table bonus points were wins GW17-25

        1. Sheffield Wednesday
          • 5 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          Think I'll call it the "Table Bonus Three Eighths Rule"

          1. Sheffield Wednesday
            • 5 Years
            9 months, 18 days ago

            ™ ® ©

    3. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      You're such a brown nose to Neale, P.S.

    4. The Knights Template
      • 12 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Mr Rigga!

      1. Skonto Rigga
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 8 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        They Call Me Mister Riggs!

        1. The Knights Template
          • 12 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          Woohoo waffle party!

        2. Sheffield Wednesday
          • 5 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          In the Heat of the Knight?

      2. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        One R away from disaster.

        1. The Knights Template
          • 12 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          Like Gary Oldman!

    5. El Muñeco
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      The article was a useful reference that to get the table bonus is quite unpredictable.

      It may be more useful as an analysis to also compare to GWs 24-38 from last year as that is more reflective of when the table bonus would be relevant. With the table not really being set properly until after the first few gameweeks, comparing GW2 to GW24 is not really like for like.

      I personally am using it on Slot/Arteta at the moment to play safe. I'd rather have a guaranteed 35 odd points from the chip rather than sometimes 50 and sometimes 0. But I guess that is why some people put 50/1 accumulators on...

      1. zøphar
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        I quite liked this bit - tempted by the Glasner punt if it still exists after tonight

        " On the flip side, Fulham have only won two of the eight games they’ve contested against a side who themselves would have qualified for table bonus. So, in 15 pertinent Premier League fixtures involving the Cottagers, 13 of them have seen a side emerge with a win/draw bonus! "

        1. El Muñeco
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          I guess that is what I mean by how you want to play it.

          For the Fulham - Palace game, the bookies have it roughly, 50% Fulham win, 25% draw and 25% Palace win. So, to get the table bonus you are calling a 50/50.

          A draw would get you 8-10ish.

          Whereas, Arsenal have an implied win chance against West Ham of 80% odd. An Arsenal would get you 8-10ish.

          So, I would rather an 80% chance of getting 8-10ish points and a 20% chance of 0.

          Versus a 25% chance of 20ish points, 25% chance of 10 points and 50% chance of 0.

          And that is one of the closer ones.

          But all comes down to one's appetite for risk versus reward.

        2. Camzy
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 15 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          I'm going Glasner if Villa don't win. Palace are a decent team.

      2. Haa-lala-land
        • 5 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        I'm not sure how Slot can be considered safe, away to Man City this week? If Slot draws with Villa this evening, I'd say the Slot selection would be a fail overall

        1. El Muñeco
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          Yes, it does come down to the Villa game tonight and in this context I was meaning Slot for 24-25 and then Arteta in 26.

          If Liverpool draw tonight, it's still be around 28 points for gameweeks which isn't bad for a low risk move.

          Obviously Salah's 29 points didn't help Slot AM picks. But will all be judged at the end of the season

          1. Haa-lala-land
            • 5 Years
            9 months, 18 days ago

            Ah I see, yep makes sense.
            TC Salah option definitely didn't help you're right, but that's just got to be removed from the equation to fairly judge the AM

    6. Geriatric Unathletic
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      -4 for Slot to Glasner it is then :).

  2. Prison Mike
    • 10 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Best transfer to free up 0.1?

    A) Konate -> Kerkez

    B) Rogers -> Dango

    C) Slot -> Glasner / any manager 1.4 or less

    1. lilmessipran
      • 13 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Prefer B

    2. bobson5
      • 15 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      B. But I don't need to free up any funds and am still considering C

    3. ShaunGoater123
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Do you have any Bournemouth players? If not probably B

    4. After Supper Ghost Stories
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Gotta be b right?

  3. FPL Virgin
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Holy crap! This is next level research.

    Wow 😯

    1. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      This reminds me of when I painstakingly went through 38 gameweeks of injury updates from Pep

      https://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/2024/07/26/is-it-possible-to-crack-the-pep-guardiola-team-news-enigma-code

      1. After Supper Ghost Stories
        • 7 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        A hefty tome... incredible amount of time it must have taken.... well done

  4. ShaunGoater123
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Feels like FH29 is right for my team however I'm keen to be as flexible as I can, to see if it becomes clear that I should FH / take hits and keep FH which leaves me with the below plan

    GW26: Amad > Dango
    GW 27: Watkins > Cunha
    GW 28: Roll
    GW29: Leaves me with 8 players (not including Fabinaski) and 2 FT's. So could get to 11 with a -4.

    Thoughts?

    Current team:
    Henderson
    Robinso / TAA / Gabriel
    Palmer / Salah / Dango / Mbuemo
    Watkins / Gakpo / Mateta

    Fabianski : Rogers / Cucurella / Davis

    1. After Supper Ghost Stories
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      I think so.... go for free hit 29 and then move on to next issue to deal with

  5. OneTeamInBristol
    • 2 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    a) Gakpo to Cunha and Emery to Arteta for free
    b) Hold Gakpo and get Cunha in 29

    If b, I won't have enough money to get Arteta

    1. The Knights Template
      • 12 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      C) throw the marshmallows in the fire, now!

    2. After Supper Ghost Stories
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      A out of the 2

  6. SpaceCadet
    • 11 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Better option this gw?

    A. Gordon > kluivert
    B. Slot > Arteta/ glasner
    C. Both for a hit

    1. The Knights Template
      • 12 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Take a hit, take a hit!

  7. OverTinker
    • 7 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    In the 1990s, Arsenal team had a player named David Dicks.When he got injured the newspaper wrote "Arsenal to play without Dicks" The Coach was very upset so the newspaper changed the headline to be read, "Arsenal to play with Dicks out...A number of women attended the match!!!!

    1. After Supper Ghost Stories
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Ha ha ha ha ha

      1. After Supper Ghost Stories
        • 7 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Neil Cox from Middlesbrough.. same joke

    2. Crunchie
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Thought it was a true story with West Ham and Julian Dicks or something like that

  8. Gizzachance
    • 11 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Play
    A Pickford
    B flekken

    Cheers

    1. The Knights Template
      • 12 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      B

      1. Gizzachance
        • 11 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Cheers

    2. After Supper Ghost Stories
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Provably B

      1. Gizzachance
        • 11 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Cheers, benched him over Pickford last gw!

    3. Nomar
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Always play Pickford

  9. Prinzhorn
    • 4 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    How long is Nwaneri still a safe starter?

    I am in between

    A) Rogers -> Nwaneri
    B) Gakpo -> Cunha

    1FT.

    1. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      No way he keeps Saka off the left wing when he is back.

      If someone can give the scout a kick up the backside, it would be nice to know if Nwaneri can play different positions along the front line

      1. Prinzhorn
        • 4 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Saka plays RW though...

        1. Miguel Sanchez
          • 9 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          So does Nwaneri

        2. FPL Virgin
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 9 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          Sorry I meant RW not LW

      2. Miguel Sanchez
        • 9 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        When is Saka due back?

    2. Tonyawesome69
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Until March IB

    3. After Supper Ghost Stories
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Can you do A this week and B next week?

      1. Prinzhorn
        • 4 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Absolutely

  10. Miguel Sanchez
    • 9 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Manager for this GW only and mid is for longer term so which combo:

    A) Araola + Kluivert (WOL)

    B) Arteta + Nwaneri (WHU)

    1. Prinzhorn
      • 4 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Nwaneri plays RW, Saka will return. Long term = not Nwaneri.

    2. Sun God Nika
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      im boring and did slot to arteta - next season ill be more risky with AssMAN

      Would go B - nwaneri seems a good short term punt or you could go dango instead

  11. Gameweek 26 Q&A
    zøphar
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Taking questions for the Gameweek 26 Q&A, answers will be posted in a separate article

    Will be writing after the Villa and Man City games tonight

    1. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Who is the best Pedro replacement out of Cuhna, Mateta, Wissa and Beto?

      If you have the AM chip on Slot, should you stick or twist?

      Which manager has the best chance of getting a table bonus in this gameweek?

      Can McKenna pull off a shock? Is McKenna as good as he is hyped up to be or is he all fart and no poo and unlikely to beat Spurs at home?

    2. Defcons are for Kinnear
      • 12 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      What to do with Palmer after GW29?

      1. Nomar
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Sell for Saka, or to fund Haaland?

    3. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Why aren't you embarrassed to support Chelsea?

    4. Haa-lala-land
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Any news on what the Mystery Chip will be revealed to be? Super excited for it.

      1. BobbyDoesNotLook
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        MS was revealed already. You can get an extra Jamie Vardy for 3 gameweeks.

    5. Egg noodle
      • 15 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Best defenders for GWs 26-29. Every option seems terrible

    6. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      The state of European football has declined so much that most big teams wouldn't be able to beat their side from 2018 - agree or disagree?

    7. Haa-lala-land
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Now that it's had time to settle and sink in, would you say the MC/AM has proved to be successful, after the initial mostly negative reaction to its reveal?
      I think it's been a great addition, and would be happy if it were a regular weekly feature next season, whereby we'd select 15 players and one manager to start the season

      1. Funkyav
        • 16 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        if it was from the start of the season that would have been better, they shouldnt be changing the rules half way through the season.

        for me the new chip is moving away from what the game is as you arent picking a player you are picking a team, there are loads of options of chips that could have been introduced that were much more in line with the game as it stood.

        I also think its not good for casuals as they dont understand the intricacies of the chip, i mean even on here people dont understand it which cant be a good sign.

        if its a manager chip you should also receive minus points if the manager gets booked

        1. RedLightning
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 15 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          It would be nonsense at the start of the season.
          But they could announce at the start of the season that it would become effective from say Gameweek 20.

    8. After Supper Ghost Stories
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Strategy for people with only wildcard and Asstmgr please

      1. Geriatric Unathletic
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Delete Team and come back next year :).

    9. pawel2591
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Would you sell Wood to buy Cunha ? (no FH29 team)

    10. ViperStripes
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Keep Diaz through til Southampton, or move onto a non-blank GW29 player sooner rather than in GW29

  12. The Mighty Whites
    • 10 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    A: Rogers to Semenyo and play one of N. Williams / Colwill / Bednarek
    B: Bednarek to Huijsen and play Rogers or Gakpo (if fit)

    1. After Supper Ghost Stories
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Crikey..... probably A

    2. After Supper Ghost Stories
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Mighty Whites = Preston?

    3. The Iceman
      • 3 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      B

  13. CoracAld2831
    • 4 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    UCL KO Wednesday captain:

    A: Vinicius Jr.
    B: Mbappe
    C: Dembele

    1. The Iceman
      • 3 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      C

      1. CoracAld2831
        • 4 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Thank you.

  14. jack88
    • 4 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    1. Dango + arteta
    2. Kluivert + glasner ( if table bonus)

    1. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      2.

      I don't like Arteta as a pick at all this week tbh.
      I don't think they're a banker to win with their current injury issues. Would rather hold onto Slot/Emery and save the transfer.

      1. jack88
        • 4 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        You think keeping slot+ saving transfer is better than switching to someone with table bonus opportunity?

        1. Camzy
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 15 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          I'm switching Slot > Glasner most likely.

          I don't like Arteta was the point. Would rather hold onto the transfer than switch Slot/Emery > Arteta.

    2. Cruyff's Eleven
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Swap Slot for Hurzeler

  15. Ronnies
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Play one?

    A) Munoz - away to Fulham
    B) Robinson - home to Palace

    Cheers.

    1. Bavarian
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      B

    2. Tonyawesome69
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      I'm currently on B and benching A

    3. After Supper Ghost Stories
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      I like B

  16. Jordan.
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    great article skonta,most interesting

  17. Gubby-Allen
    • 4 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Interesting article, happening more frequently than I assumed. Fulham were the ones to get on.

    1. After Supper Ghost Stories
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Yes but it's all hindsight... is this a betting chip to be sponsored by Bet365 next season?

      1. x.jim.x
        • 11 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        I don't understand why people keep comparing this new chip to gambling, when the entire game is based around chance - what makes "I think Liverpool will win" different to "I think Salah will score"?

        1. After Supper Ghost Stories
          • 7 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          Hello....For me fpl is based on players performance regardless of win, draw or lose over a (longer) period of time,... not just 3 weeks and not guessing team performance excluding red and yellow cards.... but I'm only 800k so I'm happy to be publicly humiliated and corrected

          1. x.jim.x
            • 11 Years
            9 months, 18 days ago

            You're still building a team based on predictions though, and hoping for a desired return. AM is just another part of that team, but they earns points in a different way.

            For the record, FPL isn't gambling as you're not staking anything except personal pride.

        2. Tommy Template
          • 11 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          Routes to points are different for players. You arent reliant on goals necessarily. Nobody can predict the bonus system for example. Plus you generally own players for longer than 3 gameweeks.

          Whereas for assman its all about do I think this team will win? Betting essentially. Even on the table bonus games its the win which is the important bit, draws generally reward about the same as the 'banker' wins. I can see the game ending up like Super 6 where you need a betting account to play I believe even if its not used and they put links and adverts everywhere to try and get you to bet on your predictions. Its a huge potential gateway.

          1. x.jim.x
            • 11 Years
            9 months, 18 days ago

            Players have goals, assists and clean sheets.
            Managers have goals, clean sheets, and wins/draws.

            How is it any different? I'll ask again, what makes "I think Liverpool will win" different to "I think Salah will score"?

            1. Haa-lala-land
              • 5 Years
              9 months, 18 days ago

              As FPL players, we've always been able to distinguish the difference between football betting and FPL. There was a clear difference and no questions asked.
              However, the line is now distorted even if only a little, but enough for the questions about it's similarity to accumulators and betting, to begin to get asked.
              Gambling ads were prevalent on this site over last Summer. They know there's a market to tap into. The cynic in me questions if they had some say in the AM chip implementation knowing it would get people at the very least thinking about betting and game odds, perhaps.

              1. x.jim.x
                • 11 Years
                9 months, 18 days ago

                Third person to avoid the question and tell me in very simple terms - what makes "I think Liverpool will win" different to "I think Salah will score"?

                I'm not arguing that gambling is overly-prevalent in football, both online and off, but I'm interested in what makes people think wishing for points from individuals is okay but hoping for team results is not.

                1. Odikostar
                  • 10 Years
                  9 months, 18 days ago

                  Everyone on here are just coming up with excuses because they don’t like change or haven’t bothered to understand how AM works

                  1. Nomar
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 16 Years
                    9 months, 18 days ago

                    I’m just going to do the dartboard method.

                    Whatever random it lands on I go with and be done with it,

                2. Haa-lala-land
                  • 5 Years
                  9 months, 18 days ago

                  what makes "I think Liverpool will win" different to "I think Salah will score"?

                  I'd say this is a huge shift in how our brains process FPL.

                  All FPL seasons prior, I have never ever, ever (!) had to hope/worry about a teams result

                  I guess I'm totally comfortable associating players traditional goals/assists/cleanies with FPL, and I've associated match results or wins and losses, with gambling.
                  Now the line is ever so slightly blurred. Could just be me though.

                  1. x.jim.x
                    • 11 Years
                    9 months, 18 days ago

                    Hoping your players score, assist and keep clean sheets is linked to their teams' results though, so saying you never have to worry about a result isn't exactly true.

                    1. Haa-lala-land
                      • 5 Years
                      9 months, 18 days ago

                      An example is say if Newcastle go 5 up against Spurs, then Porro gets an assist so 5-1, I'd be over the moon if I only owned Porro.

                      But my point is, at no time in FPL am I ever hoping one team draws or loses, I'm only thinking of cleanies and g/a.
                      I see what you're saying though, that the result is linked to them, so maybe it's all a perspective thing

                      1. Geriatric Unathletic
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 15 Years
                        9 months, 18 days ago

                        So you don't support a premiership Team then? If you did you certainly would be caring about who wins, draws or loses!

                      2. Haa-lala-land
                        • 5 Years
                        9 months, 18 days ago

                        For FPL purposes 🙂

                  2. After Supper Ghost Stories
                    • 7 Years
                    9 months, 18 days ago

                    I like this comment.... now its all about the result... not players performance.. that's the answer x.jim.x

                    1. MarcusAurelius
                      • 9 Years
                      9 months, 18 days ago

                      Saying FPL is only about player performance doesn’t make sense to me. We are constantly talking about teams performance on here and you pick your players based on fixtures etc

                      1. After Supper Ghost Stories
                        • 7 Years
                        9 months, 18 days ago

                        True but we then pick the players we think will benefit from those fixtures I think.... an attacking mid rather than defensive mid whereas the AM chip bets for a win or draw if 5 places below

                      2. MarcusAurelius
                        • 9 Years
                        9 months, 18 days ago

                        I see your point but I still think comparing the new chip to gambling is a bit far fetched for me. I just see it as another dimension to the game and a good addition imo. It seems the room will always be split on this one though haha

                      3. After Supper Ghost Stories
                        • 7 Years
                        9 months, 18 days ago

                        Yes it's certainly divided opinion. Let's see what happens next season

                      4. Geriatric Unathletic
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 15 Years
                        9 months, 18 days ago

                        Please show me where the A.M. associated blurb says 'bet. To bet you have to place a stake. Are you seriously saying that choosing an A.M. is a stake, really? Some people honestly, I give up.

              2. After Supper Ghost Stories
                • 7 Years
                9 months, 18 days ago

                I agree

            2. Tommy Template
              • 11 Years
              9 months, 18 days ago

              Because I'm not buying Salah for 1-3 games. Hes probably not the best example being a season keeper. Bournemouth mids... I wasn't thinking do I think they'll score vs Southampton I'm thinking will they score me decent points over the next 6-8 gws? And I don't really care how those points get distributed or where they come from to be honest. Perhaps I'm a bit too simplistic in my decision making process. I know Review and all the other models do factor in betting odds so its obviously not completely detached from FPL without assman. If assman was a pick one manager for the season type jobby with different price tiers like the players and it was a question of budget management I'd be more for it maybe as you aren't thinking about the outcomes of a small number of matches.

              1. x.jim.x
                • 11 Years
                9 months, 18 days ago

                Okay, what makes "I think Salah will score / assist over the next 3 games" different to "I think Liverpool win / draw their next 3 games"?

          2. Nightcrawler
            • 6 Years
            9 months, 18 days ago

            U do realize that gambling involves just as much bets on playing scoring/teams keeping cleanies as teams wins?

            When Ur selecting a keeper or defender Ur essentially predicting a teams chances of keeping clean sheets, which makes it even more similar

            1. Nightcrawler
              • 6 Years
              9 months, 18 days ago

              Players scoring*

          3. mookie
            • 12 Years
            9 months, 18 days ago

            There are prop bets on players as well.

            "Gambling is when a person bets or risks something of value (like money) based on a chance outcome that is out of their control or influence with the understanding that they will either gain increased value or lose their original value determined by the specific outcome."

            There's nothing you risk on AM that you don't risk on players as well.

        3. MarcusAurelius
          • 9 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          I don’t gamble but I see how making predictions based on your football knowledge can be compared to gambling. It’s the same thing apart from you put a stake down with gambling. It’s one of the reasons I play FPL and choose not to bet on football matches because it gives me the same feeling and gives me a great reason to be invested in every PL match. I couldn’t agree more that you can’t compare FPL to gambling because one big factor is missing which is a stake (excluding your mini league entry which is spread over a whole season not 1 game)

          1. x.jim.x
            • 11 Years
            9 months, 18 days ago

            Your last sentence sums it all up really - no stake = no gambling

            1. MarcusAurelius
              • 9 Years
              9 months, 18 days ago

              Thanks. I would say most of us play FPL for the ‘personal pride’ that you mentioned earlier. It’s a chance to show your football knowledge without gambling and be fully invested in Wolves vs Palace for example because you’ve got Cunha and Sarr in your team 🙂

          2. Haa-lala-land
            • 5 Years
            9 months, 18 days ago

            If I place a tenner on Leicester to win the league, I couldn't argue I'm not betting because it's spread over the whole season and not just one game, though

            1. MarcusAurelius
              • 9 Years
              9 months, 18 days ago

              That’s true but you get the point. We are talking about how the AM chip is being compared to gambling because people are trying to predict wins

              1. Haa-lala-land
                • 5 Years
                9 months, 18 days ago

                If it all stopped here at this point with the AM chip then fine, I'd be okay with it.
                But, it feels like the first step, like they're testing the water.
                I can see them making future little subtle changes, so subtle that noone can accuse FPL of being overtly gambling.
                For instance like they added in to the player stats the XG and XA tables, I can see a manager having the XW bookies odds next to their fixture. Oh and there's a handy link to Bet365 if you want to look up the odds yourself.

                Suddenly, in 5 years time, we look back at all these little changes..

                1. MarcusAurelius
                  • 9 Years
                  9 months, 18 days ago

                  Agreed. Let’s hope they leave it as it is!

                  1. Haa-lala-land
                    • 5 Years
                    9 months, 18 days ago

                    For transparency I love the AM chip currently, I think it's great, haha

  18. Vardi Gras
    • 1 Year
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Gameweek 26

    Bank: £0.4m
    Chip: manager (Iriola)

    Raya (Fabianski)
    Huijsen, Robinson, Alexander-Arnold (Muñoz, Harwood-Bellis)
    Kluivert, Mbeumo, M.Salah (C), Palmer (Rogers)
    Mateta, Gakpo (VC), Isak

    What to do with Gakpo and bench order?

    1. Gubby-Allen
      • 4 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Subs all fine, not sure about captain but I have same dilemma.

      Wait until Friday for Gakpo, no rush to sell of definitely out but maybe Marmoush to catch price rise and plays GW29. Him or Wood.

    2. Tonyawesome69
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      I wouldn't have Gakpo VC

  19. Gubby-Allen
    • 4 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    I thought that was Joey Barton in the photo at first.

    1. jack88
      • 4 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      they look similar yeah

  20. waltzingmatildas
    • 15 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    I'm thinking about doing:
    Martinelli, Gakpo to Dango, Cunha

    Would you also do Sels to Flekken for free?

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      No

      1. waltzingmatildas
        • 15 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Interesting.
        new, ARS, MCI is just worrying me!

        1. Tonyawesome69
          • 6 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          Assuming no FH29, surely more upside on using FT elsewhere than changing GK that doesn't blank in 29

          1. waltzingmatildas
            • 15 Years
            9 months, 18 days ago

            Good point.
            If my plan is correct, I should have 2 fts by 29 and 10 players so I think I should be ok.
            I'm actually just considering
            Fabianski, Martinelli to Flekken, Dango now and bench Gakpo.

    2. After Supper Ghost Stories
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      1st part yes

  21. Egg noodle
    • 15 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Hey, I'm from the future. Just wanted to pass on the scoreline from tonight.

    Liverpool 1-2 Aston Villa
    TAA (42')
    Rogers (82')
    Watkins (88')

    1. BobbyDoesNotLook
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      My Wednesday was ruined before the match. Next time spoiler alert please.

    2. PartyTime
      • 4 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      More misery for Emery Owners 😆

    3. It’s gonna Ben Mee
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Thanks! All my savings are on Villa tonight now

      1. Haa-lala-land
        • 5 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Egg posted on 88 minutes into the game. VAR are still reviewing the Watkins goal.

    4. After Supper Ghost Stories
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      With Salah having over 200% EO does that mean we want him to blank if only C on him?

      1. Funkyav
        • 16 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        yep

        1. After Supper Ghost Stories
          • 7 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          Oh crikey!

    5. Radulfo28773
      • 4 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Where do I have to sign for that to happen?

  22. Gizzachance
    • 11 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Play 2

    A Pedro
    B Roger’s
    C elanga
    D Robinson

    Cheers

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Definitely not Pedro.

      Maybe Rogers and Robinson

      1. Gizzachance
        • 11 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Cheers, Pedro a problem!
        1ft , Pedro to Cunha if no injuries tonight

        1. Eze Really?
          • 11 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          Good

  23. PartyTime
    • 4 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Some article this. Thanks!

    TB here I come 😆

  24. the dom 1
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Which transfer would you do?

    a. TAA > Gabriel

    b. Elanga > Mbeumo

    c. Watkins > Mateta

    Cheers

    1. Eze Really?
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      b if you not looking to use fh chip in 29

    2. The Iceman
      • 3 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      B

  25. It’s gonna Ben Mee
    • 11 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Play one:

    A) TAA (mci)
    B) Munoz (ful)

    1. jack88
      • 4 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Never bench trent

      1. Haa-lala-land
        • 5 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Never bench 2019 Trent*
        2025 Trent you can bench all the time, in fact I'm probably selling him this week

      2. KLOPPS AND ROBBERS... the s…
        • 10 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Owner and better options out there for less

    2. g40steve
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Pool going to get battered & he’s not getting 90

      1. boc610
        • 13 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        The recency bias is strong in this one

    3. The Iceman
      • 3 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      A

  26. g40steve
    • 7 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Thoughts on this lot?

    Used FT on Dango.

    Emery AM

    Raya,
    Munoz, Huijsen, Myko, Robinson
    Kluivert, Mbeumo, Palmer, Salah, Dango
    Isak,

    Fabs, Trent, Gakpo, Ndiaye,

    4.1

    1. The Iceman
      • 3 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      GTG.

  27. aapoman
    • 12 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Pointless to start counting table bonus from gameweek 2 when there have been only so little points on offer. Would be better to start the comparison e.g. from gameweek 5-10 when we actually have some idea which teams will be good and which will be bad.

    1. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      It's also pointless as you have the likes of Liverpool, City, United, Spurs, Newcastle, Forest starting the season 12th or lower

      1. Tommy Template
        • 11 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        United and Spurs are still that low after over half a season lol

        1. x.jim.x
          • 11 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          True, but loads of people would have gone for Pep, Ten Hag or Ange and got table bonus in GW1

          1. Hazz
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 8 Years
            9 months, 18 days ago

            That's a great point, I never thought about that. Would be some terrific GW1 opportunities otherwise!

            1. x.jim.x
              • 11 Years
              9 months, 18 days ago

              The following would have been pretty popular I think:

              GW1: Pep (20)
              GW2: Stick (10) or move to Silva (18)
              GW3: Stick on Pep (9), stick on Silva (4) or move to Frank (9) / Arteta (4)

              40-odd points outside of a DGW is not bad at all.

    2. g40steve
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Its a case of look at what you could’ve won 🙂

  28. Ronnies
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Which transfer should take priority?

    AM is on Slot

    A) Gordon > Mbeumo
    B) Slot > Arteta
    C) Both for a hit

    Cheers

    1. The Iceman
      • 3 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      If you're saving FH in GW29, A.

    2. Stimps
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      same Dilemma,

      Im doing B I think, give Gordon his home game

      1. Ronnies
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Gordon is good at home, but I can see double digits for Mbeumo Vs Leicester

        1. ritzyd
          • 7 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          Yep, bit like in GW 13

          1. Ronnies
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 10 Years
            9 months, 18 days ago

            So you don't buy players because they blanked in the reverse fixture?

          2. Ronnies
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 10 Years
            9 months, 16 days ago

            Hi mate, 14 points!

  29. The Iceman
    • 3 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    I'll be doing both before GW29, but which transfer would you prioritise first?

    A) Rogers > Kluivert (bha, tot)
    B) Gakpo > Cunha (FUL, EVE)
    C) Neither?

    1. Eze Really?
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Considering doing both A and B

    2. Eze Really?
      • 11 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      I doubt if Gakpo plays so A would be first on my list if you don't have a decent sub.

    3. Pep's Money Laundry
      • 10 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      A

      Do B in gw29 as Gakpo has Southampton at home in gw28

  30. Nomar
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    9 months, 18 days ago

    Anyone else got all their chips, multiple transfers and not a friggin clue when to use any of them?

    1. Haa-lala-land
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      GW32 is the last chance saloon week, if you have all of them and don't want to burn one

      1. Nomar
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Yeah.

        Just don’t want to use them for using them’s sake, if you know what I mean!

    2. mookie
      • 12 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      I reckon with multiple transfers you're in a small club.

    3. Funkyav
      • 16 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      i have no idea how anyone has saved transfers, ive been using mine each week and never been able to save

      1. Nomar
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Only got 2 saved at the moment, but don’t really see myself making one this week, either.

        But at some point I need to use my WC so I can get a decent amount of games out of it.

    4. Odikostar
      • 10 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Transfers to 11 players in 29.

      Wc in 30

      AM 31-33 on Howe

      FH 34

      TC in 36 if any double end up there.

      BB in the week your bench look the best out of 35, 37 and 38.

      Seems very logical to me

      1. Nomar
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Thank you, this is very helpful. Much appreciated.

        1. Odikostar
          • 10 Years
          9 months, 18 days ago

          You’re welcome 🙂

    5. ritzyd
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 18 days ago

      Dead End into 29
      WC 30
      TC 32 (Isak)
      BB 33
      FH 34
      AM 35-38 hopefully catch some end of season relegation fight / on the beach bonuses

      1. ritzyd
        • 7 Years
        9 months, 18 days ago

        Could also WC 31 instead of 30