Scout Notes

Sterling establishes himself as best Man City option with hat-trick

West Ham United 0-5 Manchester City

Goals: Raheem Sterling (£12.5m) x 3, Sergio Aguero (£12.5m), Gabriel Jesus (£9.5m)

Assists: Riyad Mahrez (£8.5m) x 3, Kyle Walker (£6.5m), Kevin de Bruyne (£9.5m) 

Bonus Points: Sterling x 3, Mahrez x 2, de Bruyne x 1

Manchester City midfielder Raheem Sterling (£12.0m) went a long way to proving he is worth the big bucks as a Fantasy asset by scoring a hat-trick in a 5-0 win over West Ham.

Those who opted against owning the England international, perhaps opting for the cheaper Kevin de Bruyne (£9.5m), Bernardo Silva (£8.0m) or forward asset Sergio Aguero (£12.0m) were left in the wake of his 20-point haul at the London Stadium.

Those alternative options, for various reasons, simply could not compete with Sterling.

“Since China and the Community Shield, Sterling has scored one goal minimum every game. On the first day, he played striker and for me, striker will be an incredible position for him. He can play in three positions up front.” – Pep Guardiola

19% of Fantasy managers were left disappointed when it was confirmed that Aguero had been left on the bench. Given the Argentinian’s lack of any involvement in Manchester City’s pre-season campaign, this should not have come as too much of a surprise.

However, to his credit, Aguero did come on for the last 21 minutes and got on the score-sheet, albeit in perplexing circumstances. Despite Sterling being on two goals at the time, the centre-forward demanded he take City’s 86th-minute penalty. He actually saw his initial effort saved by Lukasz Fabianski (£5.0m), but the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) ordered it be retaken for encroachment by Declan Rice (£5.0m). Aguero made no mistakes with the second attempt.

Aguero did not start at West Ham but did come on and score a penalty

Either way, the Manchester City striker conundrum will have to be assessed by Fantasy managers in the coming Gameweeks, as, on the basis of the opening game against West Ham, Gabriel Jesus (£9.5m) may have the edge over Aguero in terms of likelihood of starts.

It was a clinical performance from the Brazilian, who was sharp throughout and was unlucky to not have a brace on his first league start of the season. His clever finish from a Kyle Walker (£6.5m) cross capped a free-flowing City move to open the scoring. The right-back was awarded the assist despite a touch from Issa Diop (£4.5m) as this deflection did not change the intended destination of the pass.

Jesus thought he’d added a second goal after slotting home a Sterling square-ball but VAR ruled the goal out for an offside against the Englishman after consultation with referee Mike Dean.

Kevin de Bruyne played well despite not reaching Sterling’s FPL heights

One of the most eye-catching performances at the London Stadium came from de Bruyne, whose assist for Sterling came off the back of an incisive, dazzling run. 

If the Belgian can remain fit for the duration of the 2019/20 campaign, he is arguably undroppable. And amidst a City team of considerable instability with regards to consistent starters, it could perhaps be de Bruyne who offers the strongest value at a price of £9.5m. 

While his seven-point haul paled in significance to Sterling’s 20, that reliability of starts should go a long way this season.

Meanwhile, Guardiola’s decision to bench the 27% owned Bernardo Silva will give Fantasy managers another headache ahead of City’s Gameweek clash with Tottenham.

While the Portuguese international is supposedly one of the manager’s favourite players, it might be hard for him to drop those who played at West Ham, with attacking options such as Raheem Sterling (three goals), Jesus (one goal) and even Riyad Mahrez (three assists) excelling for the Citizens. 

There will be a number of difficult decisions for managers who have backed these benched Gameweek 1 players such as Aguero or Bernardo Silva, but City’s outstanding performance against the Hammers is indicative of a team who will not only be rampant throughout the 2019/20 season but a team that managers simply must invest in the attack of.

This was both a clinical performance and a statement of intent from City and Guardiola, with a number of Fantasy assets both emerging into potential relevance alongside consolidating their already imperious credentials for the 2019/20 campaign. 

There was a welcome clean sheet for Manchester City assets, in particular Zinchenko, who started at left-back

City’s defensive quartet of Walker, John Stones (£5.5m) Aymeric Laporte (£6.5m) and Oleksandr Zinchenko (£5.5m) were firm at the back to resist a number of attacks from West Ham.

That will be of great encouragement to those invested in the City defence as they continued to demonstrate an improved ability to withstand pressure. West Ham started the game brightly, only to tail off in the face of superior attacking play and sheer determination from City, but it was important to see Guardiola’s men look well organised and disciplined even when asked to defend.

Felipe Anderson came off with a thigh injury in the second half

There really wasn’t much to be positive about for West Ham in this game, as was expected. Hammers manager Manuel Pellegrini is likely to be frustrated at such a despondent final scoreline after his side had started brightly, but defensive lapses against one of the league’s most clinical attacking sides is not a recipe for success. The East London side will look to bounce back from their 5-0 thrashing and get their season started in earnest when they travel to Brighton, who beat Watford 3-0 on Saturday, in Gameweek 2.

Club-record signing Sebastian Haller (£7.5m) had rare glimpses of promise as a target man in the Hammers attack but offered little to convince Fantasy managers to sign him up for some upcoming appealing fixtures.

Perhaps the biggest concern for the Hammers was the fact that Felipe Anderson (£7.0m) went off injured, with what look like a thigh problem in the 66th minute. Interestingly, Pellegrini did not provide any updates on the player in his post-match press conference.

However, he did confir that Jack Wilshere’s (£5.0m) removal from play was not injury-related and was focused on ensuring his fitness due to coming back from a long-term absence. 

“Jack was OK, I made that change because he is coming back from a long injury. No problem.” – Manuel Pellegrini

Members Analysis 

West Ham United XI (4-2-3-1): Fabianski; Cresswell, Diop, Balbuena, Fredericks; Rice, Wilshere (Snodgrass 56′); Antonio (Fornals 46′), Lanzini, Anderson (Chicharito 66′); Haller.

Unused substitutes: Ogbonna, C Sánchez, Zabaleta, Roberto

Manchester City XI (4-3-3): Ederson; Zinchenko, Laporte, Stones, Walker; D Silva (Foden 80′), Rodrigo, de Bruyne (Gündogan 79′); Sterling, Jesus (Aguero 69′), Mahrez.

Unused substitutes: Bravo, Otamendi, B Silva, Cancelo

Lessons learned from Gameweek 1

2,859 Comments Post a Comment
  1. fitzy
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Why are people thinking about wildcarding already? Unless you have Trossard, Bilva and Alisson then you probably have a solid team. One week of luck shouldn't make knees tremble.

    1. Bartowski
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      The herd gets scared when it hears the distinct warblings of prices moving

      1. Hinchcliffe Thumper
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        The herd. One does what the herd does.

    2. Brosstan
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Its really hard to separate oneself from recency bias even if you know its a thing... I hate my team right now and want to rip it apart to get in Sterling, remove Fraser etc... But Im not going to do it.

      1. TheSpecialOne
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        you should do it

        1. Brosstan
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          No I shouldnt. I can wait one week when Sterling has Spurs this week.

    3. De Gea Van Dijk. 10
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Cheap enablers confirmed.

    4. The Count of Monte Cristo
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      What happened to Trossard today?

    5. BattleOfDeBruyne
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      People like to play it 'safe' and play the Scout Template. It's never a good idea to have no differential. A lot of the people who follow this scout template will be looking to make some major changes after this gameweek. This, coupled with the fact it's the first gameweek is making a lot of people panic.

      Thankfully I accounted for this by choosing players outside of the obvious picks. I think it's always important to do your own research and come to your own conclusions instead of using the safety blanket that is this community. If you choose the same players as everyone else you'll finish in a very average rank and end up in a situation like this where you have to burn a wildcard.

      I think that sums up why people are considering wildcarding. And while it seems a good solution to mix things up, I don't think players who find themselves in that position will be able to use the wildcard efficiently. It's best not to burn a lifeline so early nonetheless, it just spells a disaster season.

      1. Gentle_Turks
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        There are large chunks of the season when sticking to the template is extremely important. I'd even say it's one of the fundamentals of the game.

        1. BattleOfDeBruyne
          • 5 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          I've pretty much followed the exact opposite my entire FPL career with very successful results (usually trumping the FFScoutCast members). I agree that sticking to the 'usual' players is good to not end up falling behind, and using the scout picks is a good way of deciding on that as Scout does represent most of the top players/active players.

          It's important to have some elements on this in your team, but playing it completely safe will never end well.

          1. Gentle_Turks
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 6 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            Didn’t say one should play completely safe.

            1. BattleOfDeBruyne
              • 5 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Sticking to the template is the definition of playing it safe.

              1. Gentle_Turks
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 6 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                The operative word in my last post was 'completely'.

                Out of curiosity where did you finish last season?

    6. Weasel Boy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      I have Lloris Lucas and Guilbert.
      Throw in KWP to the mix as well.

  2. RyanKent14
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    107 with awb and Pérez to come, no to shabby to start with

    1. Boris Bodega
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Always nice to crack 100 in any week, let alone GW1, nicely done.

      1. RyanKent14
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Thanks mate, did have the big 3 though

    2. Business Cat
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Congrats

    3. Yes Don
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      105 with Martial to play

    4. Hinchcliffe Thumper
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Nice!

    5. BattleOfDeBruyne
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      That's a good start, did you burn any chips?

  3. EWH2020
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Is King to Pukki knee jerky?

    I already have Wilson and now not too sure about the double Bou attack

    1. Podge
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Looks ok to me

    2. Business Cat
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Surely you see out your plan, which I assume to be give them two gameweeks, then start shipping ahead of City

    3. Bobby Digital
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Pukki (c) candidate this week. Him or Salah.

    4. goriuanx
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Patience is key in FPL.

      I would be more annoyed if I did this transfer and King hauled, as opposed to keeping King and Pukki hauls.

    5. fantasyfog
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      you went with king and wilson....

    6. Drexl Spivey
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      I'm keeping both, certainly as next week answers.

    7. Hinchcliffe Thumper
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Pukki was in my squad already.

    8. StinkinRich
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Surely you got both for first two games. I’m keeping King till after villa at least

  4. camarozz
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Auba score predictions please??

    On 67 pts (no Sterling) with Perez/Barkley/Auba left.

    Need a few points guys

    1. goriuanx
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Score predictions won't influence the outcome.

      You've got a good score and 3 good players to go.

      Then you have 37 more GW's. 🙂

    2. Business Cat
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      I hope he can match Kane and get a brace.

      Though Arsenal away are an enigma

    3. jia you
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      On 58 here, I did predict hatties for Sterling and Auba...half way there, GL!

  5. Disco Stu
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    Anyone think Kean will be in the starting lineup for Everton next week?

    1. Squib
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Almost certain I reckon

    2. fantasyfog
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      yep

  6. DantheManinaPan
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 1 month ago

    I want to keep Bilva for next week, but I don't want to take a heavy price drop...

    No one really looks essential as a replacement and I can't see him dropped again...

    1. RedLightning
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Don't panic, Mr Mainwaring!

    2. 7rjngs lollygagger
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      He’ll miss more games but whisper it so will Sterling and KdB. It’s just in top 6 match ups you can be sure they’ll all play.

    3. MTPockets
        5 years, 1 month ago

        This will happen all season for Pep's weekly picks

    4. UpAndAway
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Anyone else stuck with Guilbert in their squad? A punt that hasn't worked obviously.

      1. Business Cat
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        I've got Targett on the other side 🙂

        Keeping for now

        1. UpAndAway
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Nice. Guilbert played the last two pre-season games so I thought he'd be fine.

          1. The Wise Owl
            • 8 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            Loads of people said Elmo would come back.

      2. waldo666
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Yep, count me in that, what's the story? Not even in the squad.

      3. Bobby Digital
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Stuck with Cathcart in my team. Now he's in rotation-nation though, so no need to get rid. Just hope that Sheffield returns next week.

      4. FULLSERVICECOVER
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        according to a few villa fans slight thigh problem,be back in next week...hope they ain't wrong.holding for now.

    5. Saint & Reevesy
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Are there any early indications of a Kane price rise prior to next week?

      1. HollywoodXI
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        He scored two goals but looked abysmal for most of the match so shouldn’t but I’m sure lots will buy him (even with City away next GW) so probably yes.

        1. Saint & Reevesy
          • 12 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Still the worst World Cup golden boot in history..... but he seems to have a knack of scoring goals/points.

          Thinking of doing Kane to Aubameyang (obviously after I’ve seen Auber and arsenal play).

          1. HollywoodXI
            • 10 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            I much prefer Auba. I thought Kane was terrible despite scoring twice.

            1. TheBrazilianRonaldo
              • 5 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              He did have 8 shots though

      2. TheDragon
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Anyone buying him before Cory based on that performance needs heir heads looking at

    6. HollywoodXI
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Wow the bar is set high on FFS. I was pleased with my score until I came on here lol

      1. goriuanx
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Never compare your score to those on here. Most of the scores here are gloats. Once the season is in full flow, compare your score to the top 10k average with the aim of having 5 or so more points. 🙂

        1. HollywoodXI
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          🙂 I’m on 76 with two to play and I’m really pleased with that. Annoyed I didn’t keep Kane in my team (went with Moura as Spurs cover) but he looked so poor for 85 minutes I’m not feeling too badly about that!

          1. waldo666
            • 14 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            You should be pleased, good score.

            1. HollywoodXI
              • 10 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Thanks mate! How did you get on?

              1. waldo666
                • 14 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                77 with 4 to play so can't complain.

      2. George Sillett
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Don't worry. It generally tends to be only the poor insecure souls who feel the need to brag who post their great GW scores. Guaranteed that when they have a crap week they won't post a score at all.

        1. HollywoodXI
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          ^ this

        2. SADIO SANÉ
          • 9 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          unfortunately this - I'd ban score posting if this were my site tbh (unless someone gets best score of the week or something)

          1. Saint & Reevesy
            • 12 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            making your. Username link automatically to your history would solve this in 2 mins. Plus allow users to assess the credibility of advice you’re getting.

            1. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
              • 15 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              What if we don't agree to it?
              They can't enforce such a rule. I wouldn't want my rivals knowing who I am following my every move..

              My cash leagues are more important than people on ffs.having a link to my history so they know if I'm genuine or not...belive me

              Plus it's personal data

            2. SADIO SANÉ
              • 9 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              I don't really care if they are telling the truth or not - it's just completely pointless information - coming on to say 'I got 82, 2 players to go' adds nothing AND annoys people; I mean at absolute minimum wait until the GW is over

    7. Dacra
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      Wow, all the good players are rubbish now 24 hrs later!

      1. George Sillett
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        We're they good to start with ?
        Herd mentality prevails .

    8. KaBoZ: Kids,don't Drin…
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      What's up with the Ederson wagon? What am I missing?

      1. Crystal Alice
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Probably Alisson owners switching

        1. De Gea Van Dijk. 10
          • 6 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Pep roulette.

      2. Business Cat
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        ...that's a long-ass username!

        1. KaBoZ: Kids,don't Drin…
          • 9 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          😀

      3. korbendallas82
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Nailed in City defence i guess,

      4. TheDragon
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Most nailed way into the city clean sheet train

    9. camarozz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      See a few taking hits... Madness.

      Save FT and have 2fts plus a - 4 gives you 3 changes after 2 gws which can really help shape team if your unhappy with it.. . Like a mini WC before an early WC.

      Buys your some time.

      It's perfect.

      1. 7rjngs lollygagger
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        I think I got Pereyra this time last season or was that GW2. In any event he didn’t return again all season pretty much.

        Fulham also got some decent reviews as well after their first week showing. Lots of promise was the verdict.

      2. TheDragon
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Taking a hit after week 1 is literally madness unless someone in your squad got injured or sent off

        1. camarozz
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          I agree. 2 or 3 changes after two gws is better and means you don't have to panic over price changes etc.

          Worked for me last few seasons.

        2. Das Boot
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          not at all, got a player who didn't play

      3. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        I have no transfers I feel like making so far. Quite happy with my 82 and 2 to go.

        Will roll a transfer unless for some reason Barkley or Perez don't start/get injured.

        1. Brosstan
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          I doubt its people with 80+ points who are making transfers.. Its easy to sit tight when you nail your gw1 team.

          1. TheDragon
            • 6 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            In on 80 with Robinson, King and Guilbert - we’ve all got issues!

            1. Brosstan
              • 10 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Robinson looked great. King was terrible and I would be genuinely scared he gets benched next game. Guilbert a big issue!

            2. Camzy
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 14 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Only Guilbert is an issue. Robinson looked promising and King has one more week then ship for Pukki or some other form striker.

      4. Business Cat
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 1 month ago

        Start transferring when there's information.

        Fair enough if you're transferring out Allison, but for all the no-shows (Trossard, Bilva...) it's too early

      5. Wise words. I intend to follow this advice. 😀

    10. have you seen cyan
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 1 month ago

      how terrible were watford today? If you had holebas would he be a concern?

      1. MTPockets
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Didn't watch it but concerned about about owning Deeney after reading fan forum:
          http://www.wfcforums.com/index.php?threads/watford-fc-v-brighton-hove-albion-10-08-2019.56113/page-12

          One game in though

          1. Brosstan
            • 10 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            "Can Deeney please just **** off now? I am honestly so, so sick of the bloke. What is he good at? What exactly does he do?

            Arrogant, stroppy *** who is about 3 years past his prime and offers absolutely nothing in 90% of games.

            Sure he'll smash in another penalty soon and beat his chest like he's something special and our dribbling fans will lap it up, but the bloke is 100% turd."

            Harsh but true

            1. MTPockets
                5 years, 1 month ago

                Yeah I stopped reading at that page and logged out of FPL before I kneejerked. But it's coming

        • Moose™
          • 12 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          70 with Martial, Perez, Dendoncker, and Vardy to come in. No chance to crack 100.

        • BattleOfDeBruyne
          • 5 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          I don't think we can conclude that Sterling is the best option after 1 game. He played very well but it was an easy fixture. You need a consistent player who will perform in both the good and bad fixtures. I think De Bruyne played a great game and a lot of positives can be taken from it with regard to his performance. Mahrez also had a great game but I wouldn't consider him an option.

          1. Dacra
            • 10 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            I have Sterling, I want Kdb too now.

            Can afford it though, was playing around, only way I can see is if Allison is injured long term to do Ederson/TAA/Moura to Adrian/Laporte/Kdb over the next 2-3 weeks.

          2. TheSpecialOne
            • 5 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            lmao. what is this take? how many times does sterling have to score goals and rack up assists before ppl are happy with him.

            1. BattleOfDeBruyne
              • 5 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Because the title of this post is claiming that he's the best man city option. That's a little presumptuous after a single game week. This is a classic mistake a lot of FPL players make, which is choosing players based on a single game week. You are picking a player who is expensive, costing £12m, because he performed in an easy match. That's what Sterling is - A big match player. I'd be interested to see if he can perform consistently like that. I think KDB will probably have more points by the end of the season.

              1. 3 A
                • 8 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                Learn from history. Sterling ppm last year is 6.9 and got around 234 in 34 games.

                KDB average around 5.2 - 5.7 (his best) ppm since make debut for City. He once get 199 and his best total points is 209.

                I will take Sterling because he easily can be a captain option.

                KDB looks value but not a good captaincy option.

                1. BattleOfDeBruyne
                  • 5 Years
                  5 years, 1 month ago

                  That's the point, you're confusing a better player with a better FPL player. I think KDB will be looking to compete with Sterling this season in terms of points, and he's far cheaper. If you're choosing Sterling over Salah then you're likely burning yourself, and if you're choosing both then you're crazy.

                  I also don't think you can say KDB is not a captaincy option. OFC Sterling poses a greater threat but you can only choose 1 captain each week and I think combinations like Salah and Kane will provide enough captaincy coverage to void any reason to fork up the cash for Sterling.

                  1. 3 A
                    • 8 Years
                    5 years, 1 month ago

                    Ffs of course said in term of FPL players. And Sterling is the best in that perspective.

                    I think u just cant accept it. Its on your name. 😀

                    If u want to say the best pleyer in real life, the most important player for the team, it can be Kante for Chelsea, or Allison for Liv, but they cant have many points more than their colleages in term of FPL

          3. Camzy
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            I dunno mate. Sterling has basically confirmed that he's worth it. Most players already knew he'd be worth it, but this is the cherry on top.

            1. BattleOfDeBruyne
              • 5 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              I scored 86 points so far this gameweek with players left to come, and I don't have Sterling. Omitting him from my line-up will not cost me as much as if I were to omit players like Salah. These are the standard players everyone tends to have, they don't win you seasons. I know Sterling will perform well, but at that price tag I could do much more than the few points he will get in the easy games.

              1. Seb Wassell
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 11 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                I also scored 86, with 3 players remaining, and I have Salah, Sterling and KDB. Many ways to play my dude.

                1. BattleOfDeBruyne
                  • 5 Years
                  5 years, 1 month ago

                  Yes but that's the point.... If you don't burn your money paying for Sterling those 3 players remaining would be much better.

                  There are cheaper ways to achieve success in the area of Sterling, and that money could be put to MUCH better use.

        • SADIO SANÉ
          • 9 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          it's way too early to say this but I think 11m Pukki Jota could be the answer up front, I can see the latter two ticking along all season

          1. Saint & Reevesy
            • 12 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            Yeah was impressed with Norwich and Pukki. Looks like they have goals in them

          2. Drexl Spivey
            • 6 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            Buendia £0.5m cheaper.

            1. Camzy
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 14 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Midfield spots are more valuable.

              1. SADIO SANÉ
                • 9 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                yep on of the advantages of this is you can focus transfers on that 7-8m midfielder slot which could be quite volatile

              2. George Sillett
                • 8 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                Yes. Hope Ceballos starts . If he does and plays the Rambo role he would be a snip at 5.5

            2. Hinchcliffe Thumper
              • 9 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Pukki outscores him

          3. RyanKent14
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 5 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            I have Kane and considering it, got king in right now though, but always liked Jota, and Pukki the man for Norwich

          4. Threat Level Midnight
            • 6 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            Jota hasn't played a game yet. You people are a joke

            1. Gnu
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 15 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Oh Lordy, mastermind is back.

            2. George Sillett
              • 8 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Wind your neck in . The guy was only expressing his opinion.

            3. SADIO SANÉ
              • 9 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Jota's PPM was ridiculous last season, why does it matter if he's played yet? 😀

        • Saint & Reevesy
          • 12 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          On another note

          Anyone else feel that VAR after goals kills ‘the moment’ in football. Given goals are comparatively few and far between in football it’s the experience of these moments that makes football IMO.

          1. Kind of agreeing with this. Made a nonsense of my one match.

            1. Saint & Reevesy
              • 12 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              It’s hard to get that jump out your seat when the ball rips into the net feel when you know it’s going to be reviewed.

              Also what’s the point in having linesman when offsides I’m goals get reviewed anyway.

          2. Business Cat
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 10 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            They need to better communicate what precisely is being looked at and why to the fans

            Having 40K fans not knowing what's happening isn't good

            1. Saint & Reevesy
              • 12 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              I’m ok with it for goal line calls as fans will know it’s a tight decision, plus the communication to the ref is instant. But reviewing goals is madness.

          3. Hinchcliffe Thumper
            • 9 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            **cking hate VAR.

            1. Saint & Reevesy
              • 12 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              I do and Southampton actually benefitted from it early in our game - ultimately irrelevant though 😉

              Jesus second goal that was disallowed as Stirlingshire shoulder was fractionally ahead is a nonsense- that’s onside all day long.

              It’s just pedantic and kills the moment.

              1. Hinchcliffe Thumper
                • 9 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                It kills the beautiful game.

          4. bloomooner
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            Exactly my thoughts.
            VAR won't kill football but it'll lessen those "go nuts" moments.
            We won't see players running off like loons either, they'll have to wait for the decision, then the moment is gone.

        • Don Kloppeone
          • 7 Years
          5 years, 1 month ago

          Does the “Top 10k average” on LiveFPL take a few weeks to settle or am I misreading? It says 65.92 average. I have 78 but am OR 285k?

          1. SADIO SANÉ
            • 9 Years
            5 years, 1 month ago

            it's ID 1-10000 atm

            1. Don Kloppeone
              • 7 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Confusing!?

          2. MTPockets
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Numberwang. Assume it's yesterday's top 10k?

              1. Don Kloppeone
                • 7 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                Hmm. Used to be my first port of call to check how I’m looking. Hopefully will sort itself out

                1. MTPockets
                    5 years, 1 month ago

                    Actually 1D 1-10k makes more sense. There's no real benchmark yet

                    1. Don Kloppeone
                      • 7 Years
                      5 years, 1 month ago

                      Well then I finally made the top 10k .... it just happens to be IDs 😆

              2. Dr. Rog
                • 15 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                meaningless at this stage. top 10k just means gameweek 1 highest points. whilst some of the players they definetly got right, by GW2 it could all change

                1. Don Kloppeone
                  • 7 Years
                  5 years, 1 month ago

                  Yep makes sense. I’m hoping for slow and steady wins the race.

                  It’ll come good. If not hold off on trfs for a couple of weeks hopefully

            • Berkan
              • 9 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Trossard -> Robinson or save my transfer?

              1. Bobby Digital
                • 7 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                How was Robinson? I was stuck watching snoozefest Cry - Eve...

                1. Berkan
                  • 9 Years
                  5 years, 1 month ago

                  Didn't see much from him on MOTD but 5.5m for a player playing support striker who had a great pre-season looks appealing

                  1. Camzy
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 14 Years
                    5 years, 1 month ago

                    He's a good option. I watched the game. Looked dangerous. I would wait on the Chelsea game though. Barkley or Mount is likely the best option for that transfer.

            • Bobby Digital
              • 7 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Lundstrom do enough for a start next week?

              1. have you seen cyan
                • 5 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                starting him over holebas lol

                1. Bobby Digital
                  • 7 Years
                  5 years, 1 month ago

                  Same here.. got Cathcart. Did a last day change Dunk -> Cath. Would've got a perfect week had I not.

              2. BEARZINHO
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 6 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                Where are all you blades fans who said lundstram wouldn’t play? Care to admit you were wrong?

            • Hinchcliffe Thumper
              • 9 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              80 points and Perez&Barkley still to play. Im not complaining at all.

            • The-Red-1
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 7 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              So I've prob made a huge mistake and subbed in sterling for a hit.

              Ah well, there's always next year!!

            • Dr. Rog
              • 15 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              96 with Martial and Perez
              shameless gloat

              1. Hinchcliffe Thumper
                • 9 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                Nice!

              2. TheDragon
                • 6 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                99 incoming

                I joke, awesome score!

              3. Don Kloppeone
                • 7 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                Awesome score!

                78 with Perez and Jota to play but happy enough

                1. Studini
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 6 Years
                  5 years, 1 month ago

                  Same here - 78 with Perez and Jota. Great minds 🙂

            • Stevie B
              • 13 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Why is my "overall rank" 209,012 and my "gameweek 1 rank" 260,677. Should it not be the same? Thank you!

              1. TheDragon
                • 6 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                Patience - it’s still updating the GW1 league

              2. Hinchcliffe Thumper
                • 9 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                Game is still updating. Check tomorrow.

            • BattleOfDeBruyne
              • 5 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              So after today's performance is Origi nailed? I was impressed with his performance in the Champions League and was considering him for this season but was told he wouldn't start. After today do we think he'll be getting a little more game time?

              1. TheSpecialOne
                • 5 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                theres that other guy on their squad.. forgot his name again... the golden boot one.. i mean the other golden boot one.

                1. Bobby Digital
                  • 7 Years
                  5 years, 1 month ago

                  Show me the Mané

                2. BattleOfDeBruyne
                  • 5 Years
                  5 years, 1 month ago

                  You realize he can play in more than 1 position.

                  1. JIMMY TUGGINS
                    • 5 Years
                    5 years, 1 month ago

                    Where would you play him then? Who would you drop?

                    1. BattleOfDeBruyne
                      • 5 Years
                      5 years, 1 month ago

                      Origi or Mane could potentially drop to midfield but I honestly doubt it. I think it's more likely that they will rotate with some midfielders and Origi will progressively get more game time, and potentially be a good pick.

              2. Saint & Reevesy
                • 12 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                He’s the bargain of the century if he does. I get the feel he will be an impact sub with mane starting ahead still. Hope I’m wrong as it would feel up funds for other players big time

                1. BattleOfDeBruyne
                  • 5 Years
                  5 years, 1 month ago

                  He's such a powerful player that to bench him would be a complete waste of resources. I think they'll have to work him into the team somehow, and he's the perfect FPL player.

              3. JIMMY TUGGINS
                • 5 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                Of course he's not.

              4. Klaren
                • 7 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                Salah, Mane and Firmino are all nailed and there is no other position Origi can play in other than forward 3 so no he is not nailed, he will be a backup for those 3.

              5. Seb Wassell
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 11 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                Injury aside, there is literally no chance Origi becomes a starter over Firmino, Salah or Mane.

            • Babit1967
              • 8 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              As a Celtic fan I am completely baffled by Pukki as he was terrible for us but really looks the part for Norwich

              1. Dr. Rog
                • 15 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                calm down, he wont play Liverpool every week 🙂

              2. Saint & Reevesy
                • 12 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                He’s got better players around him 😉

            • Hinchcliffe Thumper
              • 9 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              My last tweak in my team before season start was to switch from Alisson to Pope/Heaton rotation.

              This is my best start in recent years.

            • Weasel Boy
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 12 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              Deeney to Maupay or Pukki?
              Or
              Guilbert to Montoya?

              Thanks

              1. Hinchcliffe Thumper
                • 9 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                Pukki&Montoya

                1. Weasel Boy
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 12 Years
                  5 years, 1 month ago

                  Yeah might to that.

              2. Bobby Digital
                • 7 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                Defender substitutes are a bit of a turnoff

                1. Weasel Boy
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 12 Years
                  5 years, 1 month ago

                  Guilbert looks like a non starter.
                  Ever!!

            • StinkinRich
              • 13 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              So what happened to the new “rule” on penalty rebounds? City game with the retake...

              1. Gnu
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 15 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                The penalty taker can't score the rebound, I think that was the wording.

              2. Hits from the Bong
                • 6 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                What rule? Rice encroached. Save would have stood if Rice didn’t then clear it

                1. StinkinRich
                  • 13 Years
                  5 years, 1 month ago

                  Confused!

                  1. StinkinRich
                    • 13 Years
                    5 years, 1 month ago

                    There will be no rebounds from penalties
                    Play will stop for a restart if a penalty is saved or hits the post, meaning there will be no chance to follow up and score from rebounds, meaning players will no longer need to line up on the edge of the area.

                    1. Hits from the Bong
                      • 6 Years
                      5 years, 1 month ago

                      Oh. Has this actually happened? Rice got done for encroachment and they were definitely lined up on the edge of the area for the retake

                      1. StinkinRich
                        • 13 Years
                        5 years, 1 month ago

                        Sounds like the rule didn’t go through. First I’d heard of it!

                    2. Gnu
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 15 Years
                      5 years, 1 month ago

                      Hmmmm.
                      I see your point.
                      Commentator said it was Rice encroaching but surely the issue was Fabby was off his line.

                      1. Hits from the Bong
                        • 6 Years
                        5 years, 1 month ago

                        Both BT and MOTD commentary said VAR ruled that Rice had encroached. And I’m sure I saw the referee explaining this to Rice

                        1. JIMMY TUGGINS
                          • 5 Years
                          5 years, 1 month ago

                          I think he encroached AND Fab was off his line, either one would be a retake.

                          1. Hits from the Bong
                            • 6 Years
                            5 years, 1 month ago

                            They specifically said it wouldn’t have been retaken if he didn’t encroach. Maybe they were wrong but I thought they were in contact with the VAR people. Strange

                2. JIMMY TUGGINS
                  • 5 Years
                  5 years, 1 month ago

                  I think Fab was also off his line wasn't he? Seems to be a huge advantage to takers now.

            • have you seen cyan
              • 5 Years
              5 years, 1 month ago

              vardy and Jimenez > Auba & Abraham?

              1. Saint & Reevesy
                • 12 Years
                5 years, 1 month ago

                I assume this is a wind up as Neither have even played yet ?