Home Page Exclusions

Baseline BPS – A new way of understanding FPL bonus points

I’ve put together a simple new way of looking at the Fantasy Premier League’s (FPL) Bonus Point System (BPS), which is used to calculate players’ bonus points. Called Baseline BPS, the aim of this new way of looking at the scoring system is to better understand why some players are excelling and some falling short when bonus points are awarded.

Baseline BPS Explained

“What is it?” I here you cry. Baseline BPS is simply a player’s BPS score with all the obvious stuff (that’s already rewarded directly) stripped out. For instance, if in a given game a defender keeps a clean sheet, scores a goal, and recieves a BPS score of 12, his Baseline BPS would have been 4, which is derived from;

12, minus 4 BPS for a goal, minus 4 BPS for a clean sheet.

The idea is that you can see what kind of BPS score a player is getting independently of the stuff we already look for, and thereby get a hint of who is going to pick up bonus points with all things being equal.

Methodology

Here’s what I’ve done:

1. Count how many games a player has played 60 mins or over in (shorter appearances are likely to give skewed BPS figures)

2. Count up their total BPS earned over those games

3. Deduct the total BPS scored that would have originated from goals (8/6/4 for strikers/mids/defenders), assists (3 for all positions) and clean sheets (4 for defenders)

4. Add back on any easy-to-calculate negative BPS (yellow cards, OGs, missed penalties)

5. Divide by the number of games played

Example

Let’s take Alexander Kolorov as an example:

1. Played 20 games over 60 mins

2. Totalled 151 BPS in those games

3. Got 1 goal (-4),  8 assists (-24) and 8 clean sheets (-32) in those games

4. Got 2 yellow cards in those games (+2)

5. A net BPS of 93 divided by 20 gives a healthy Baseline BPS of 4.7

Results

Baseline BPS values per game are given below for a selection of players

Forwards

2.7 – Rooney

1.6 – Sturridge

1.2 – Suarez

1.1 – Lukaku

0.8 – Giroud

0.7 – Aguero

Midfielders

4.9 – Yaya

4.9 – Silva

4.9 – Gerrard

4.6 – Cazorla

4.2 – Ramsey

3.8 – Erikson

3.6 – Ozil

3.3 – Lallana

3.1 – Hazard

2.6 – Sessegnon

2.2 – Walcott

Defenders

5.5 – Mertersacker

5.3 – Jagielka

5.1 – Koscielny

4.8 – Distin

4.8 – Terry

4.7 – Demichalis

4.7 – Kolorov

4.4 – Chico

4.2 – Walker

4.0 – Coleman

3.9 – Ivanovic

3.5 – Ward

3.4 – B Turner

3.0 – Olsson

Conclusions

  • Centre-backs probably score around one BPS higher than full-backs on average. Not a huge amount, but enough to swing the bonus point allocation.
  • Strikers are totally reliant on their 8 BPS per goal to get bonus. Anything less than a value of 2 means they are actually losing BPS as the game goes on.
  • Wingers also score pretty poorly, probably due to losses of possession.
  • All-action midfielders do almost as well as centre-backs, probably for similar reasons
  • Players from better teams seems to score slightly better than equivalent players from worse teams (pass completion maybe?)
  • The individual results from Arsenal are a little surprising.

I’ve compared these scores against ones for the same players that I did last year (where available), and they generally fall within about 15 % of last year’s totals, which suggests that they are likely to be pretty constant from year to year.

If anyone would like to add some more figures for players that I haven’t listed, I’d love to see them.

73 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Dino
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 11 months ago

    Is that a picture of B&B?

    Open Controls
    1. J0E
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      We spent ages looking for one...but had to settle for the above instead. 😉

      Open Controls
  2. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 11 months ago

    Great analysis btw....shows just how much the new system dislikes full backs and wingers and how much it favours box to box midfielders and centre backs.

    I hope full backs and wingers are priced accordingly next season.

    Open Controls
    1. Billy Gilmore
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      Even better – adjust the baps formula so they are equally rewarded for doing well in areas they are supposed to do well.

      Open Controls
    2. Bedknobs and Boomsticks
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      Thanks Jonty. Would love to see a few more mediocre players added if anyone has a history of silly choices last season. There are also big gaps in the Chelsea and Man City defences, Id like to see how Nasri did, and then of course there's Baines if anyone fancies working out a few more.

      Open Controls
      1. Camp No No
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 11 months ago

        Yeah, would like to see baseline baps per game for other City defenders and Nasri. And Fernandinho.

        Open Controls
    3. BigManBakar
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      But someone like a Hazard would surely be an exception, because even as a winger when he's having a poor game he has a penalty to fall back on (assuming he stays and is preferred penalty taker over costa)

      Open Controls
      1. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 11 months ago

        Hazard was only actually down a few bonus on what he would have got the previous year under the old system.

        He did have the benefit of the new system in that the old system penalised players for not playing 90mins and he came off the bench in one game for 15mins and got 2 bonus when he would not have got any under the old system.

        Open Controls
        1. Camp No No
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 11 months ago

          Whereas the new system doesn't reward created chances as much as the old one did, which I guess would have been beneficial to Hazard.

          Open Controls
    4. Elniñorules
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      Bit of a generalization imo Jonty. Yaya/Ramsey would have scored & assisted enough to warrant baps in any season. Same with centre-backs outperforming full-backs. I think barely any full-back has really outperformed their respective centre-back this season. If we had proper wingers of the likes of CR7, they'd have done great even this season.

      Unfortunately, with FPL, it's hard to generalize. We just have to acclimatize and adapt as the season goes by. Isn't that why we love this game? 🙂

      Open Controls
      1. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 11 months ago

        I'm not sure how this will format but I went through Yaya's bonus for this season and he was down 7 bonus points on what he would have got last year or 17% which is quite significant for the top scoring midfielder.

        GW New Bonus Old Bonus
        1 2 1
        2
        3 3 3
        4
        5 1 2
        6 2 2
        7 2 0
        8 1
        9
        10 1 3
        11
        12
        13 1 1
        14 3 3
        15
        16
        17 3 2
        18
        19
        20 2
        21 3 2
        22
        23 1
        24
        25
        26
        27 3 3
        28
        29
        30 0 1
        31 5 5
        32
        33 0 3
        34
        35
        36 3 2
        37 1 2
        38 1
        Total 33 40

        Open Controls
        1. Dino
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 11 months ago

          Ramsey was down 8 bonus points with a total of 19 which would have been 27 under the old system or in other words he was down almost 30%

          Ramsey
          GW New Bonus Old Bonus
          1
          2
          3
          4 ,3 ,3
          5 ,2 ,2
          6 ,3 ,2
          7
          8 ,2 ,2
          9 ,0 ,3
          10 ,2 ,3
          11
          12
          13 ,3 ,3
          14 ,0 ,2
          15 ,0 ,2
          16
          17
          18
          19
          20
          21
          22
          23
          24
          25
          26
          27
          28
          29
          30
          31
          32
          33
          34
          35 ,2 ,3
          36
          37
          38 ,2 ,2
          Total, 19, 27

          Open Controls
          1. Dino
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            9 years, 11 months ago

            Walcott was down a whopping 8 bonus points over the 9 games he played over 60 mins in. He had a total of 6 bonus points when he would have had 14! that means his bonus went down by 57%! Anecdotally we all knew that the dribbling wingers were down bonus points but this really shows how we need to start moving our money from the midfield to the front and the defence imo.

            Walcott
            GW ,New Bonus ,Old Bonus
            1
            2 ,0 ,2
            3 ,0 ,3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            12
            13
            14
            15
            16
            17
            18 ,3 ,3
            19 ,0 ,3
            20 ,3 ,3
            21
            22
            23
            24
            25
            26
            27
            28
            29
            30
            31
            32
            33
            34
            35
            36
            37
            38
            Total ,6 ,14

            Open Controls
            1. Baines on Toast...
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 13 Years
              9 years, 11 months ago

              I think there's a danger of jumping to conclusions though - okay, so DFs and mids are better for baps, but there's still a load of midfielders who did really well and when they're firing, the extra goal and CS point all add up.

              Open Controls
              1. Dino
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 14 Years
                9 years, 11 months ago

                I agree the mids still have good potential but 10m worth?

                Open Controls
            2. The3rdTurd
              • 13 Years
              9 years, 11 months ago

              I think some of your numbers are a bit off Dino, although the overriding message is still correct.

              I make it:

              Yaya.......34 (-4)
              Ramsey...17 (-8)
              Walcott.....7 (-9)

              I've been keeping a track of these figures through the season, saved as a Tableau viz here (the B+/- column on the right is the relevant one):

              http://tinyurl.com/2013-14FPLdetailedStats

              It's also shown graphically on the 'Bonus point gain/loss' tab, where it's clear the biggest gainers were defenders and keepers, while the biggest losers were mids (no surprises there really).

              At the extremes, the biggest gainer was Koscielney with a gain of 22 baps (out of the 24 baps he actually won). Downing was the biggest loser, with a loss of 15 baps.

              Open Controls
              1. Dino
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 14 Years
                9 years, 11 months ago

                They could be (and most likely are if you have them in a table already 😀 ) as I did them manually.

                It does say Rambo had 19 on the actual fpl stats page though 😳

                Also I have just been back over Yaya's number and I missed one of his actual bonus this year so that should be 34 but he defo should have had 39 going off my numbers (I had one extra given to him under the old system due to not seeing two people level on the same pts for the 2 bonus but I took that away).
                I just checked out your numbers and Yaya is missing gw38 for some reason?

                Open Controls
                1. Dino
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 14 Years
                  9 years, 11 months ago

                  Your excellent collection of info seems to be missing gw38 for all players (at least the two I looked at so far in Rambo and Yaya)

                  Open Controls
                  1. The3rdTurd
                    • 13 Years
                    9 years, 11 months ago

                    Ah yes, good spot. I need to refresh that online version for GW38 figures.

                    Open Controls
                    1. Dino
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 14 Years
                      9 years, 11 months ago

                      Excellent work you two

                      Open Controls
                  2. Smarty Pants
                    • 14 Years
                    9 years, 11 months ago

                    Yeah, last week is missing, but it didn't change much, the picture is clear. Ramsey has 19 (-8) with GW38.
                    I just did the same analysis myself and can confirm the numbers.
                    In total:
                    goalkeepers = 151 (+136)
                    defenders = 944 (+563)
                    midfielders = 891 (-359)
                    forwards = 736 (-26)
                    total baps = 2722 (+314)

                    Open Controls
              2. Dino
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 14 Years
                9 years, 11 months ago

                THE3RDTURD have I told you how much I love you?

                This tableu is something else buddy, I will have days if not weeks of fun playing with it. Thanks a million.

                Open Controls
              3. Bedknobs and Boomsticks
                • 14 Years
                9 years, 11 months ago

                Also BOOM!
                😀

                Open Controls
      2. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 11 months ago

        In other words with a midfield of Walcott, Gerrard, Ramsey, Yaya and Hazard you would have lost 50 points in Bonus this year compared to last year. Makes you really think if the big mids are really worth it eh?

        Open Controls
  3. Billy Gilmore
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 11 months ago

    +1 for use of Sir Aleksander, -1 for misspelling said sir's name 😛

    Open Controls
  4. GTS
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 11 months ago

    So correct me if I'm wrong but this statement " which suggests that they are likely to be pretty constant from year to year" means that defenders are really the source of BPS since then and could also predict that maybe next season it would be seen again as a source of it?

    Open Controls
    1. Bedknobs and Boomsticks
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      It means that idividual players have generally had very similar scores over the last two years. Assuming that the system isn't changed the trends across positions should also be unchanged

      Open Controls
      1. GTS
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 11 months ago

        ahhh... ok got it now. thank and nice work B&B! 🙂

        Open Controls
  5. Irish Madridista ⭐
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 11 months ago

    What about winning goals being worth more BPS?

    Like Sturridge scored a few winning goals in the 1-0 wins, so he got more baps than normal due to that right? Or am I totally wrong?

    Open Controls
    1. Billy Gilmore
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      Good point.

      Open Controls
    2. Camp No No
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      You're right. Soldado the ridiculous example of this.

      Open Controls
    3. Elniñorules
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      Puncheon owners would loved this rule.

      Open Controls
      1. Elniñorules
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 11 months ago

        *would have

        Open Controls
    4. Billy Gilmore
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      There is also the point that most of the game winning goals will be from strikers, where this baseline bps is practically useless as they're not going to get baps without attacking returns.

      Open Controls
    5. Bedknobs and Boomsticks
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      Tbh I've never understood how the rule applies to say a 2-0 win. Which is the winning goal there?

      Open Controls
      1. Camp No No
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 11 months ago

        1-0.

        Open Controls
      2. Camp No No
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 11 months ago

        and if it's, say, 4-2, it's the 3rd goal of the winning team. Always the goal by which they would have won it regardless of whether they scored more after it.

        Please correct me if I'm wrong. I reckon another way of counting the winning goal, which would be the goal that took the winning team to a lead that they never gave up. So, if the process would have been like:

        1-0
        1-1
        2-1
        3-1
        4-1
        4-2

        ...the 2-1 goal would be the winning goal in this system. But the way that I've got it is that in FPL they use the first definition, by which the winning goal would be the 3-1 goal, because of that last minute consolation goal.

        Open Controls
        1. Dino
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 11 months ago

          Yes the 3rd goal for the team winning 4-2 is the winning goal afaik

          Open Controls
  6. Dino
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 11 months ago

    Excellent article B&B well done.

    It is especially useful for defenders imo as it should be able to help differentiate between two cb's which one is more likely to get the bonus if they get a clean sheet.

    I trust your figures are right but I tried to do this earlier in the season for Kosc and Mert and Kosc seemed to better when the goals etc were taken out of the equation, maybe mert pulled out some big numbers in the run in?

    Open Controls
  7. Billy Gilmore
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 11 months ago

    I'm sure someone (I'm looking at you 3rdTurd and Smarty Pants) will have a spreadsheet of all the fpl data.

    Open Controls
    1. The3rdTurd
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      At your service 🙂

      http://tinyurl.com/2013-14FPLdetailedStats-excel

      Open Controls
      1. Billy Gilmore
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 11 months ago

        Called it 😎

        Open Controls
      2. Billy Gilmore
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 11 months ago

        10,455 rows! Yowzers! 😯

        Great work as always.

        Open Controls
  8. Baines on Toast...
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 11 months ago

    Great stuff, would love to see where someone like Huddlestone sits.

    Open Controls
  9. JK - Cønt ⭐
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 11 months ago

    This is positively awesome stuff

    If you can combine this with some of the excellent tables we'll have, like Wakey's and Doosra's then you can really find the top, top picks

    Open Controls
  10. King Nil Miss ✩
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 11 months ago

    Great article, will look to play 5-3-2 next season 😎

    Open Controls
    1. Camp No No
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      With 5 CB's.

      #parkthebus

      Open Controls
    2. Dino
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      You need to be careful with this as the defenders need to get cs before they can get bonus and pre xmas last year I had double chelsea defenders when they hardly got a single cs. There was some analysis by Chris Glover which showed that the top defences did tighten up in the middle to late part of the season.

      Here it is http://tiny.cc/wgmmgx

      Open Controls
      1. King Nil Miss ✩
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 11 months ago

        Thanks, Chris knows his numbers.

        Open Controls
    3. JK - Cønt ⭐
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      I don;t think it's a simple as that

      yes strikers need to score to get BAPs, but by the same token, they're strikers, that's what they're supposed to do and hence in most cases they will continue to dominate the BAPs. However, what this does help to show is the strikers who would have the lowest need of scoring to get BAPs.

      Open Controls
      1. King Nil Miss ✩
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 11 months ago

        Of course not but will look at solid CBs while before I was only staring at FBs and their assist/scoring potential.

        Open Controls
  11. applebonkers
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 11 months ago

    great stuff. pedant police inside wonders if you also deducted winning goal bps, think that's the time-consuming cherry on the icing on the cake

    Open Controls
  12. applebonkers
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 11 months ago

    rather than defenders becoming too loved last season i think it was actually a case that they were malnourished in the past and this was bringing them nice and even. at least since the stat based bps came about, as before then we did have the dunne 3bps and the kyrgiakos hair theory.
    defenders and keepers now where they should be bonus wise. if anything needs to change now it's their prices bumping up a bit to reflect this, not the bonus system

    Open Controls
    1. Dino
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      You can't change the prices to reflect it imo as then people will just go for all cheap defenders as in the past. I thought their prices were just about right last season.

      The attacking midfielders are really suffering though (see Ramsey and Yaya's total bonus under this years system compared to last years above) and I can see 5-2-3 coming into play a lot next season if the big attackers start with a bang.

      Open Controls
      1. Bedknobs and Boomsticks
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 11 months ago

        Its the assists that are causing them to struggle.

        Say a 1-0 win:
        Goal scoring striker gets 8 + 1 = 9 BPS
        Centre back gets 4 + 5 = 9BPS
        Assisting mid gets 3 + 4 = 7 BPS

        Open Controls
        1. Dino
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 11 months ago

          It doesn't seem to be just the assists though, Ramsey and Walcott had some fairly monster ESP points but very few BPS points for the same game. I think it is the negative points for losing possession and missing the big chances that overly penalises moreso.

          Open Controls
          1. Dino
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            9 years, 11 months ago

            The wingers really seem to be suffering as they can't get the extra defensive points midfielders get and they don't have enough passes to get the pass bps yet they are negatively penalised for every time the lose possession or miss a big chance.

            I think the no10's will do ok as long as they get a lot of possession and get their 3bps for pass completion but wingers seem to be almost a no go unless they are going to get plenty of attacking points without the bonus.

            Open Controls
          2. Bedknobs and Boomsticks
            • 14 Years
            9 years, 11 months ago

            Im the case of Walcott certainly, Ramsey did ok for baps considering how many games he played.

            Things could perhaps be made better by dropping it to 6BPS for a goal for all positions and not hammering the losses of possession quite so much.

            Open Controls
            1. Dino
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 14 Years
              9 years, 11 months ago

              Ramsey did ok but he was still down 8 bonus points over 21 games which extrapolated over a season would be 14 bonus points. But he was in a position to earn the def points and the pass completion bps so he was not the worst hit compared to the attacking wingers.

              Open Controls
        2. RedLightning
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 11 months ago

          It's actually been a double whammy for many midfielders. Not only are their assists less well rewarded BPS-wise, they are also awarded fewer assists than in the previous season because of the change in the FPL assist rule. And it may well be the wingers and full-backs who have lost out most because fewer of their crosses have counted as assists.

          Open Controls
        3. RedLightning
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 11 months ago

          ... In other words, a cross from a wide player that deflects significantly off one or more defenders before reaching the goal-scorer no longer qualifies as an FPL assist.

          Open Controls
  13. JK - Cønt ⭐
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 11 months ago

    Warning long-post alert

    The thing that stands out here is Mert and Kos

    at the start of the season when both were 5.5 this is a clear indication that Mert was the better pick. However from the January wc and beyond there's so little in it that it became harder to justify paying around 1m more for Mert over Kos.

    The further thing to note is that should Sagna's move to City go through Zaba is basically dead as an FPL option (though he never was one IMO), as his main advantages were his perceived attacking threat, which really wasn't greater than Kolarov's to begin with, and his nailed-on-ness, which disappears with Sagna's arrival.

    He doesn't even feature on this list which suggest that he needed attacking returns to get BAPs. Now bear in mind that until his late season surge he went nearly 20 GWs without one. This coupled with his him now being a rotation risk takes him out of the equation.

    So, what of Demichelis? He looks like the best option, but is he really? IMO he was signed a a stop-gap as City had splashed out in attack (Negredo, Navas, Fernandinho) and so had no money left and Pelle, needing an option in defence turned to his old friend. But at 33 he is clearly not there long-term and City's pursuit of Mangala shows they want someone younger (and what of Nasty?)

    Then there is Kompany. Again it looks likje he needs to score to get BAPs most of the time, but he does offer the nailed-on factor. But I can easily see him being 6.5, which, if so, probably makes and Arsenal or Chelsea defender a better option

    So, where does this us. Well only 2 City defenders feature on this list, Demichelis and Kolarov. We've dismissed Demi, and we know that Kolarov isn't nailed and therefore can approach with eyes open (him being left out of the CL squad could be a huge added bonus) So, if you want a City defender you know there is only one option

    Open Controls
    1. Camp No No
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      The only reason I ever picked Zaba out of all City defenders was that he was nailed-on and when I made the choice no one else was.

      Open Controls
      1. JK - Cønt ⭐
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 11 months ago

        yeah, that was my point, Zaba's only advantage was his nailed-on-ness. That may be about to go

        Open Controls
    2. Bedknobs and Boomsticks
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      Jk, the players on the list are entirely arbitrary. I never owned Zab or Komp so don't have any data for them

      Open Controls
      1. JK - Cønt ⭐
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 11 months ago

        ah ok, what a waste of my time that was then 😆

        Open Controls
        1. Dino
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 11 months ago

          Good post nonetheless JK.

          I agree with most of your sentiments re city defenders in any case and I don't think they will justify the price point they come in at with the system Pelle wants them to play. Maybe if they get a better cb and a more defensive def mid they might get more clean sheets but unless something like that happens I won't be going near them.

          I think the options from Chelsea, Arsenal, Spurs, Utd and possibly even the likes of Everton and Stoke will offer better potential returns.

          Open Controls
  14. The Sarjeant
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 11 months ago

    Brilliant article.

    Open Controls
    1. The Sarjeant
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      If I could +1 it I would!

      Open Controls
    2. Piggs Boson
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      I'd favourite it if I could.

      Open Controls
  15. Smarty Pants
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 11 months ago

    "If anyone would like to add some more figures for players that I haven’t listed, I’d love to see them".
    BOOM: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1C3ho00JwOCxfkHPdEBuZ-KxqR02TXQCqV9H5Wgpi8Bg/edit?usp=sharing
    😉

    Open Controls
    1. Bedknobs and Boomsticks
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      Very much BOOM!
      😀

      Open Controls
    2. Dino
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 11 months ago

      Right this is stats overload for me, I'm calling it a night!

      Awesome stuff though SP

      Open Controls