Opinion

The Burning Question: Is Eden Hazard Really ‘Essential’?

With the highest score in the Fantasy Premier League last season, Eden Hazard is hot property heading into the 2015/16 campaign. At the time of writing, the Chelsea winger is far and away the most popular player in the game and is owned by an astonishing 56.9% of Fantasy managers. While the majority clearly see him as a must-have, could Hazard’s hefty £11.5m price tag be better used elsewhere? With this in mind we ask the Burning Question: Is Eden Hazard Really ‘Essential’?

Applebonkers says…
Tantalisingly for Chelsea fans, Hazard should still be on an upward curve in his career. With the same manager in place and same team-mates around him, you’d therefore estimate at least a similar sort of output this time round.

It would have taken a price tag north of 12m to start window shopping elsewhere. Assuming Diego Costa passes the penalty baton back to Hazard after their Gameweek 38 shenanigans last season, then he remains the only big hitter in midfield with that trump card in his locker.

Essential is a word I prefer to avoid, but in a game of so many unknowns there is a comforting feeling of predictability about the Belgian.

Simon March (2014/15’s Fantasy Premier League winner) says…
“Essential” is a bit of a derided term around these parts but I do believe there are particular players that, in certain circumstances, it may too dangerous to go without. Right now, for me, Eden Hazard, falls firmly within that category.

Even if we look past the fact that he averages over 200 points a season, that he was the top FPL point scorer last season or that he is the standout performer among the reigning Premier League champions, it’s impossible to ignore his ownership percentage. At the moment, Hazard sits in over 56% of squads and he will also be a popular captaincy choice. This means that, while his ownership remains so high, the matter of whether he performs well or not will, each week, be a hugely influential factor, potentially the most decisive factor, on rankings throughout the game. I’m not sure I’d want to bet weekly against a player of that quality at those stakes.

Eventually, a broader range of high-scoring players will emerge and Hazard’s ownership figures will start to be dispersed among those alternatives. Other options will become more viable. Until then, however, the cost of owning Hazard may well be the cost of keeping up with the competition.

Jonty says…
I said Angel Di Maria was essential last year and look where that got me. If any player is to take the mantle in 2015/16 it is Hazard. The Belgian’s huge ownership means that if he scores a penalty and gains bonus points in Gameweek 1, non-owners face a potentially disappointing start to the season.

His track record is also impressive. Last year he racked up 233 points and part of his appeal was an ability to gain FPL bonus points from just an assist, goal or even his general passing play. This season, I think he can easily gain a similar total points haul, but he may struggle to match his bonus tally of 42, with passing prowess given less prominence in 2015/16’s bonus allocation.

This year his price also has to be taken into account. Last term he finished on 10.8m, which was remarkable value for his points return. He now starts at 0.7 more, while team-mates Cesc Fabregas, Diego Costa and midfield rivals like Theo Walcott are less. Can he offer the same bang for his buck at a new inflated price? This year I think there may be better value heavy hitters in the 8m to 10.5m category.

There is also Chelsea’s poor set of fixtures early on, with West Brom and Manchester City amongst their opening trio of opponents. Over the season I have no doubt Hazard will be amongst the top scorers but arguably he won’t over the first three Gameweeks.

I’ve tried drafting teams with or without him. The ones without all look better, with Fabregas allowing a whopping 2.5m to be spent elsewhere. But then I look at Hazard’s ownership, his track record and his strong performances in pre-season and that word ‘essential’ comes back into my thoughts again.

D1sable says…
Season long I’m going to have to say ‘yes’ with the current information we have. Of course Fantasy Football can spring surprises and I have learnt not to completely write off anyone, so while I’m open to changing that view, as it stands, he offers, at least for my mind, the best route into the probable League champion’s attack.

He’s still young at 24 and I can only see progression in his ability and performances. He’s 100% nailed on, started all 38 matches last season, he’s on penalties, and rarely succumbs to injury. He also loves bonus points (although with the new system perhaps slightly less), which makes him a great Captain choice.

Having said all that I’m not starting with him. His fixtures and early season form in the past have made me look elsewhere (perhaps naively) but this is mainly due to me planning an early wildcard. Would I advise anyone to follow suit who wasn’t planning on hitting the button? Absolutely not.

Evs says…
Do we have anyone else in his mold, with the exception of Sergio Aguero? Arguably not.

We no longer have a Gareth Bale, Frank Lampard or Steven Gerrard, who in their prime ripped up midfield scoring charts. The only competitor I see to him in FPL points scoring is Alexis Sanchez, who seems to share points amongst other Arsenal attacking colleagues.

Last year I went for Cesc Fabregas over Hazard to save a couple of quid. This worked out well over the first few months as both players went toe-to-toe on points. The cheaper Fabregas’ price rose, I refused to sell him and by Christmas I was left behind and was chasing the pack without Hazard, who by then had become a points juggernaut.

So for me, once bitten twice shy. Hazard is the prime midfield option and is the first name on my team sheet.

Ryan says…
No player is essential. The elite options have been priced accordingly and thus we cannot have all of them. With a budget of 100m, sacrifices will need to be made so a team cannot include all of Sergio Aguero, Eden Hazard and Alexis Sanchez plus a multitude of 8.5 – 10m options. With so much value in Arsenal’s attack, Sanchez could be dropped from that list, leaving Aguero and Hazard as two who might be considered ‘essential’. Even then, though, having both would use nearly a quarter of the budget and that will have serious implications on the rest of your team.

Going without Aguero early on might help matters but once he returns and starts a good run of fixtures in Gameweek 4 you’ll want to get him in. As a way of releasing funds, Hazard owners will be tempted to sell and it begs the question- why would you want Hazard for his first three matches, that include a visit to Manchester City and West Brom. Perhaps less funds spent on Chelsea assets might not be a bad idea to start off with.

Mark says…
Hazard is scaring the pants off me: I can’t remember going into Gameweek 1 facing a decision which I felt could genuinely make or break my season.

I’ve got nagging reservations about Chelsea over their opening fixtures and there’s no doubt that the funds liberated by omitting the Belgian can transform my squad in key areas.

While Hazard has, at times, looked effective in pre-season, Chelsea have appeared to be predictable and over reliant on his ability to break open opponents. For me, it stands to reason that Swansea will devise tactics to shutdown this avenue of attack and go all out to block supply and impede Hazard’s progress – by fair means or foul. They witnessed Arsenal’s stubborn resistance at Wembley and Garry Monk will take heart and notes from that.

Following that tricky Gameweek 1 match-up, Hazard and Chelsea go to the Etihad in a scenario that will likely see Jose Mourinho show his traditional brand of bus-based caution in a bid to smash and grab the points. Then it’s off to the Hawthorns, with Tony Pulis set to make shackling Hazard the number one priority. Everton and Arsenal follow on in the next three. In short, it’s a hugely testing start for Mourinho’s side.

That all adds up to stuttering beginnings for last season’s top Fantasy asset and, potentially, with Alexis Sanchez and Sergio Aguero active and in demand, we may even start to see Hazard’s huge ownership begin to decline, along with his price.

This all sounds convincing but the flipside is that Hazard will likely end the season as the top scoring player across the Fantasy games. Mourinho will surely find a way of protecting him, granting him space and ensuring he’s the major influence. However, given their early opponents, I’m not sure how quickly that will come together. Until then, I’m wavering.

Is Hazard essential? He is to Chelsea’s title hopes. Right this minute, he’s not to my initial Fantasy lineup.

Like I say, I may have just broken my season already.

J0E Podcaster and writer. Tweets stats and stuff via @FFScout_Joe Follow them on Twitter

4,587 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Jimmers
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Yes

  2. Lucy.
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Oh no. Not the 'essential' tag again.

    1. Heydudes13
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Ab is guilty of labelling a player by their nationality, an overly common trait FFS has.

      1. Mull
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        I thought it was just me who noticed this!

        1. Heydudes13
          • 12 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          It's so annoying lol

      2. The Nuttman
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        You mean he's not Belgian, lies!

    2. Ruth_NZ
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Hi Lucy.

      How is Pelle looking in pre-season?

      My team has been stable for 3 weeks. Now Costa may screw the whole plan. 😕

      1. Lucy.
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Yeah Costa's not looking ready, is he? 🙁

        Pelle's confident and scoring goals. He's starting to form an understanding with Mané too. If I didn't have Mané, I'd have him.

        1. Ruth_NZ
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          Thanks. I may switch Mané for an 8.5 or 9.0 and put in Pelle. Keep 2.0 or 2.5 in the bank. I can't easily invest that 2.5 because I can't then easily get it out again for Aguero in GW4.

          Means I have to find a new captain as well. But I'll wait on the presser, if I think Costa will start I'll take the risk I think.

  3. FPL Daniel
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Yes first

    1. FPL Daniel
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      First name on the team sheet

      1. super zlatan
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        And mine.

      2. The Nuttman
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Phew.

      3. Pork Pie Sausage Roll
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Nice recovery

        1. FPL Daniel
          • 14 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          😉

  4. Slam
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    *Waits for all the RMTs to switch to Aguero/8.0-8.5/Sakho frontline*

    1. Herman Toothrot
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Have that with hazard

  5. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Yes.

    1. The Nuttman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      it is it's true, yes it is.

  6. Drip Doctor
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Another loss for Chelsea today, i know pre season can be misleading but they are struggling and with their mixed bag of fixtures, is Ivanovich at 7m too much...?

    1. onionbarje
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      No, Jose will just park the bus and get 1-0 results all season

      1. inter the wild
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        I agree. Which is a reason Hazard may not live up to the hype.

      2. Drip Doctor
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        It's really not as simple as that.

    2. Ruth_NZ
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      United 2014/15:

      Pre-Season - won 5, drawn 1, lost 0
      First 5 PL games - won 1, drawn 2, lost 2

      Chelsea 2010/11:

      Pre-Season - won 1, drawn 0, lost 4 (including a 3-1 defeat in the Charity Shield)
      First 5 PL games - won 5, drawn 0, lost 0

      Just a couple of snapshots from history.

      1. Jose's Magic Omelette
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Exactly, unless you saw the games the results can be so misleading.

        You can't even make assumptions about the quality of the opposition based on team name as all will be at different points in terms of match fitness and their preparations, the fielded 11 of either side may be a B team or may be A team players playing like a B team.

        Definitely don't make big decisions based on performances in pre-season games unless you saw them or highlights and even then it's dangerous. All pre-season is really useful for is for determining formations and starting 11s.

        See, http://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/2015/08/04/the-burning-question-how-much-influence-should-pre-season-have-on-our-initial-team-selection/

    3. Jose's Magic Omelette
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      To say the players were playing with the handbrake on today is already an understatement. I wouldn't read much into the results.

      I agree with other commenters though, don't let it put you of Ivanovic. As Mark so aptly put it, Mourinho will inevitably go for 'his brand of bus-based caution' in those harder fixtures so Ivanovic shouldn't be impacted.

  7. Drip Doctor
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    No, he isn't essential IMO.

  8. Mull
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    I haven't got the bollocks to go without him even though I don't think he's worth 11.5m.

  9. Just A Hat
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Just A Hat says...
    Yes

  10. Teddy Brewski
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Your thoughts would be appreciated on this lot!

    Myhill / Hennessey
    Azpi / Kos / Cedric / Francis / Coates
    Haz / Silva / Cazorla / Mahrez / Westwood
    Rooney / Kane / Deeney

    Cheers

    1. Murder on Zidane's Flo…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      I'd downgrade Azpi and bolster the midfield. I like Mahrez but him and Westwood is a little weak imo

  11. Carrick Doesn't Deserv…
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    glad to see I'm not the only only one thinking of not having him for the first three games

    1. MaxiRobriguez
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      I've not had him in any of my drafts for about a month now. Ultimately it's a risk, but one I'm willing to take. I don't think Hazard's first few games will be season defining, and the absolute maximum he's going to score in his first four will be around 30 points, which means if people captain him every time I'll be at worse 60 points off which while not ideal isn't season defining. His price will barely move if that does happen as everyone has him in already.

      On the opposite spectrum, if Swansea shut him out and Man City and WBA combined only let him get one goal, then other options in that time frame would at worse match that point tally. Haz's price in this scenario will start to drop.

      I think it's highly likely that after GW6 just about everyone will have Hazard in their team. Hindsight will tell us whether the people putting him in from the start were right, or those who took a short term gamble on others and got him in for cheaper later were instead.

  12. Parm
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    I'm only getting him because i'm slightly scared of him going crazy.

    1. onionbarje
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Yes but its worth taking a punt on wally for one gwk

      1. Parm
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Already wasted my GW1 punts on Walcott, Lukaku & Wilson.

  13. Long Juan Silva
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Long Juan Silva says...

    No.

  14. DrunkPhilosophy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Sakho , Wilson , or Deenay? Discuss please 🙂

    1. Teddy Brewski
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Deeney

    2. SuperDunny - Used to be goo…
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Sakho... proven

    3. The Nuttman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Sakho.

  15. Exilizer
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    fabregas and spend the money elsewhere.

  16. inter the wild
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Lets get a bit of perspective here.

    Hazard will likely do what he did the previous two seasons - spells of 2pointers punctuated by decent games.

    This is no Suarez, in fpl pts terms.

    1. Exilizer
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Then again who is?

  17. Heydudes13
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Lol @ not owning Hazard owners

    1. isacki: full casual
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      not owning Hazard owners? Is that even possible??

  18. Lucy.
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    He's a great pick. He's not 'essential'.

  19. ViperStripes
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Great article

  20. FPL Daniel
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Mark
    "Is Hazard essential? He is to Chelsea’s title hopes. Right this minute, he’s not to my initial Fantasy lineup."

    WOW. *Fels off the chair

    1. Mull
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Daniel comes to a crossroad. Which road will he follow, the way of his hero or his club?

      1. Kip
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        😀

  21. Murder on Zidane's Flo…
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    It's a no from me. Hopefully he has a bad start, the casuals ditch him and the price drops like a stone

  22. Exilizer
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    How much money do you have ITB?

    4.5m here

    1. Jimmers
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      You don't get any interest on it

    2. Les Bleus
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      😯

    3. World XI
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      0.5. gives me flexibility

  23. Drip Doctor
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    I don't get the whole high ownership argument, surely a Hazardless team is stronger in other areas, no?

  24. World XI
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    What was the score in the Chelsea game today?

    1. Drip Doctor
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Lost 1-0.

      1. World XI
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        strong line up?

        1. Herman Toothrot
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          Not to start with, pretty sure the groundskeeper made the initial lineup.

  25. isacki: full casual
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Frankly you could get more points from investing the extra money in a Chelsea defender over Hazard as things stand right now.

    1. Drip Doctor
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Really? I'm not sure they'll keep many CS over the first 6 GWs.

      1. isacki: full casual
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        That's exactly when I think they'll be defending the most, against the good teams. And if there's one thing Mourinho's taught me, it's that when he decides to defend you might as well switch off your TV.

  26. LAMB TEA
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    hazard is overrated for me, better use the money elsewhere

    1. The Nuttman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Might bookmark this.

  27. Numb
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    After reading the above I am now going to change my team - literally - too much experience here to ignore

    1. HVT
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Are you sure it was just this article?
      😉

      1. Numb
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Lol, no 🙂 but this has probably tipped me over the edge! Been feeling it coming for a few days now, then your team and now this!

  28. Lizard Lips
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    No such thing as essential. Rambo and YYT were 2 seasons ago yet a flutter of teams didn't have them in the upper echelons. The key is, the masses up there did, so imv he's one of the must have picks if you want an easy ride to a good rank. Going without him is crazy, he could net 30+ points as captain in the first week.

  29. Essential or Safe?
    d1sable
    • Has Moderation Rights
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Essential should be changed to Safe.

    The ultimate safe pick, safety in numbers, safety in points, safe as a captain.

    And its the captain part that matters really

    Hazard + 4.5

    or

    Milner/Chadli + Walcott

    I would say b wins every time if you don't intend to captain Hazard.

    Looking at the fixtures though, when would you aside from maybe this week?

    1. Les Bleus
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      You have to take into account captaincy though.

      How often would you captain Chadli/Milner/Walcott compared to Hazard?

      1. Les Bleus
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        Just saw you addressed that 😛

        1. d1sable
          • Has Moderation Rights
          8 years, 9 months ago

          Yep and if you look, every fixture he has where he would be an option Aguero has a better game

          1. Numb
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 9 months ago

            But so many people will captain this week

            1. d1sable
              • Has Moderation Rights
              8 years, 9 months ago

              Well ill have to hope my captain outscores him 🙂

              1. Numb
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 9 months ago

                Yep!

    2. Drip Doctor
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Yep. Agree.

      1. Dušan Citizen
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        WHAT A NAME! 😆

    3. isacki: full casual
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Safe... but still essential, because it's too unsafe to go without.

      It was the same way for the last essential, and safe player, Suarez.

      1. d1sable
        • Has Moderation Rights
        8 years, 9 months ago

        But you would captain him ever week.

        Look a the gameweeks you would captain Hazard in. Aguero usually has an even better game.

        1. isacki: full casual
          • 12 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          Then Hazard isn't really a safe option; he isn't a safe captaincy choice. Actually even disregarding Aguero, he's not that good a captaincy option. He blanks pretty frequently. He's a steady performer. Not essential or even safe though imo.

          A player can top score over a season, but be significantly outscored by switching between alternative players in form. That's why we have transfers.

          The most recent essential players were Suarez and RVP IMO.

          1. d1sable
            • Has Moderation Rights
            8 years, 9 months ago

            The original post you say he is essential then you say hes not.

            Im confused 😮

            He blanks frequently yet hes a steady performer

            that part confuses me too....

            Maybe its me and its too late!

            1. isacki: full casual
              • 12 Years
              8 years, 9 months ago

              Sorry it is pretty confusing - I meant safe is pretty similar to essential. Not specifically referring to Hazard.

              He's steady as in over a long period he will get a lot of points. You just don't know when, hence the blanking frequently part. That's why whenever I owned Hazard, I would own him for a long time.

              Players like Suarez and RVP blanked rarely.

              1. perchanddestroy
                • 8 Years
                8 years, 9 months ago

                RVP blanked big time last year.And everybody had him.Essential he was.

                1. isacki: full casual
                  • 12 Years
                  8 years, 9 months ago

                  You know RVP 2014/2015 is not the RVP I'm not referring to 😆

                  1. perchanddestroy
                    • 8 Years
                    8 years, 9 months ago

                    But RVP 2014/2015 is the one everybody had to have.

    4. Lizard Lips
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Captaincy aside I think Hazard and Ritchie can beat Wally and Sterling.

    5. Tiamani Warrior
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      can't the 4.5 just be on your bench though? don't need milner on the bench

    6. Pavsboot
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Feel like people might just be overthinking this one. . At the start of every season everything is up in the air anyway, why not just go with the guy who you can almost be sure you will get points off.

    7. perchanddestroy
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Do you remember when last year everybody HAD to have RVP or the year before when it was absolutely essential to have Ya Ya Toure?"Safe" seems to mean "Accepted wisdom" i.e what everybody else says.

    8. Qubit
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Anyone averaging over 6ppg is pretty essential in my view, and its not a captaincy thing either, its about having the players who WILL score you points (of course if this were to change then he'd be out on his ear).

      Sure you *might* do better elsewhere, but usually there is an increasing risk attached. I frequently see this game described as being played either a) like a dullard b) as a flair player. I find this rather black and white tbh.

      What you are really looking for is minimising risk as far as possible most of the time to allow you to take occasional well calculated 'risks' - the majority of which hopefully work in your favour if you are good at calculating the risk.

    9. Philmatic
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      The extra few million is tempting but I don't want to put myself through the anxiety of hoping Hazard blanks every time Chelsea play!

  30. Les Bleus
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Weird one:
    A) Azpi and Cedric
    or
    B) Darmian and Mert

    1. orangetruck
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      A