Digest

The Digest – Gameweek 3

Our final look back at Gameweek 3 assesses Bournemouth’s hat-trick hero, City’s perfect combination of form and fixtures, and the growing competition for our attention in the Chelsea midfield…

The Player

Callum Wilson’s clinically taken hat-trick at Upton Park earned Bournemouth their first ever win in the Premier league and has sparked a major bandwagon across the Fantasy games.

With many wildcards being wielded, the Cherries lone frontman picked the perfect time to announce himself as a value candidate for our three-man frontlines, with over 166,000 Fantasy Premier League (FPL) managers snapping up his services. As Fantasy managers search for this year’s Charlie Austin, who scored 18 times for promoted QPR last term, Wilson has subsequently risen from 5.4 to his original 5.5 starting price.

Delving into the data further, Wilson’s displays suggest he’s a viable option both home and away. Thanks to his weekend showing, the Bournemouth frontman has now scored more away goals than any other player in the top four tiers since the start of last season (15), with Eddie Howe’s team tailor-made to utilise his pace and movement on the counter. The Cherries, meanwhile, have won 17 penalties since the start of last season – three more than any other club in the top four leagues.

With the Upton Park result handing them a major morale boost, Bournemouth can approach their upcoming fixtures with renewed confidence. Eddie Howe’s side racked up 98 goals on their way to winning the Championship last season and with the likes of Simon Francis, Matt Ritchie and Max Gradel all supplying the creativity, Wilson’s growing band of owners have every reason for optimism ahead of four very strong showdowns in the next five (LEI, nor, SUN, WAT).

The Team

After three rounds of fixtures, Manchester City look in ominous form after a 2-0 win at Everton continued their 100% start to the season.

Manuel Pellegrini’s men sit at the top of the table, with nine goals scored and a trio of clean sheets accrued, and with an outstanding schedule to follow, many Fantasy managers are scrambling to load up on their main men.

Up next for the Etihad side are four home matches (WAT, WHM, NEW, BOU) allied with trips to Palace and Spurs in the next six Gameweeks which should allow Sergio Aguero the chance to run riot as a captaincy option.

Whilst few will be willing to go into that period without the Argentine on board, the battle is on for our attentions further back. Yaya Toure and David Silva look the chief midfield protagonists, though Raheem Sterling threw his hat in the ring with an assist at Goodison – for those who cannot stretch to Silva’s 10.1 price tag, Sterling is now just 0.1 more expensive than the Ivorian (8.9 to 8.8).

At the back, Aleksandar Kolarov’s 15-point haul against the Toffees moved the left-back to joint-second in the overall FPL standings along with team-mate Vincent Kompany. Although the Belgian is, overall, the more secure pick, Kolarov’s raids down the left and understanding with Sterling have proven a key weapon in the opening three outings. With Gael Clichy still building up his sharpness, there’s a growing belief that Pellegrini will tinker as little as possible as he looks to maintain momentum and move further away from the chasing pack.

The Talking Point

It took Pedro just 20 minutes to announce himself to Fantasy managers after opening the scoring in Chelsea’s 3-2 win at West Brom on Sunday afternoon.

By the time the final whistle went at the Hawthorns, the Spaniard had also bagged an assist and maximum bonus points, serving up a 13-point haul on his debut for the defending champions. Given that Eden Hazard has managed just eight points in his first three appearances, it’s easy to see why over 190,000 FPL managers have already snapped up his new team-mate.

Coming in at 9.5 to Hazard’s 11.5, Pedro offers an obvious alternative to the pricier Belgian as a route into Chelsea’s attack. Whilst there’s no questioning Hazard’s Fantasy potential – 14 goals and ten assists in each of the last two seasons says it all – Pedro’s acquisition perhaps indicates that the former Lille man may not be quite as “essential” in many managers’ eyes.

Whilst Hazard ultimately saw off the challenge of Cesc Fabregas as the prime Chelsea midfield pick last year, Pedro brings a far greater goal threat than his compatriot, having chalked up a 15.7% conversion rate in La Liga last term.

Certainly, the weekend showing has had an effect. Although he still sits in over 42% of FPL teams, Hazard has been sold by 404,000 FPL managers since the start of the season – over 110,000 more than any midfielder – and, along with Wayne Rooney, has been identified as the prime source of freeing up cash for our 15-man squads.

Whether Pedro can rival Hazard overall remains to be seen but with a 2.0 difference in cost, the Spaniard’s value for money is clearly set to play a part in how many assess the Chelsea attack from here on in.

Paul Is certain he won't make the same mistakes next season. Follow them on Twitter

1,931 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Total Foot 5
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    anyone thinking of doing:

    FT Diouf or gomis > wilson

    1.yes
    2.no

    1. Sheeeit
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      2

      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Everyone is thinking of doing Sakho -> Wilson, nobody is really thinking of dropping either Diouf or Gomis

    2. BERGKOP
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      No

    3. NATSTER
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      i'm thinking, but i also feel it is not the good move.

    4. Rewant-WantToWinEverything!
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      No not for Wilson, I am in the dilemma to whether ship Gomis out for Costa or not. I expect Chelsea to explode in terms of goals and have no cover for them and that worries me :/

      1. Total Foot 5
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        yep.
        would u go for Pedro or Haz in the mid?
        u reckon they xplode ag CRY?

        1. Rewant-WantToWinEverything!
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          Yep against palace.. I am not too sure about their either of Pedro or Hazard. Pedro had a confusing debue. His goal was a deflected one, he took a chance at goal that was so wayward that it assisted Costa to his goal and when he finally cleanly set it all up for Willian he somehow shot it wide! Hazard is not going inside the box much. Costa is what I would prefer even if that's means taking a hit to bring him in. But in my case I would have to ship out Sanchez to accommodate Costa and its holding me back so far!

  2. Horlicks esq.
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    TORRESMAGIC

    +++++ THIS LEAGUE IS CLOSED +++++

    Can I not get in on this now?! 🙁

      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Too late.

    1. Moin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      nope

    2. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Would be a bit unfair to those who have been knocked out.

    3. Horlicks esq.
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Ah tetts.

      If ive been eliminated due to low score then fair, but if my score competes then surely i can just nestle in quietly somewhere?

    4. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      The next main entry period is in the article.
      A bit busy to open the league atm.

      1. Horlicks esq.
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Ok lad. No worries.

        I guess my bad for not keeping a breast with it all.

        tets and nipples.

        1. TorresMagic™
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          Find me in international break and I'll squeeze you in.

  3. n-doggg
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Which two to play?

    A. Richards (SUN)
    B. Shaw (swa)
    C. Muniesa (WBA)
    D. Targett (NOR)

    1. Kings of Lyon ★
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      AD

    2. Ludo
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      AC

  4. alexdelarge
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Anyone besudla me considering C Mahrez instead of kun.
    Thought Kun looked slow and not the Aguero we are used to. Plus that watford is more defensive than Bournemouth

    1. Hakuna Juan Mata
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      I've been thinking about it too, but I don't have the balls to do it

  5. Quinny___
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Your a BPL manager who do you want in your team, Schneiderlin or Matic?

    1. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Matic.
      Loftus Cheek would be my pick.

    2. The Nuttmxn
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Neither.

      1. The Nuttmxn
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Would probably take a gamble on William Carvalho.

        1. Quinny___
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          So you take a gamble on a player which is reported to cost £30m upwards who's played one season in the Portuguese league over two established premier players?
          One of whom was influential in winning the league last year

          I dont understand the logic

          1. The Nuttmxn
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 12 Years
            9 years, 2 months ago

            I believe he could go for the low 20's, he has a lot of seasons ahead of himself and many promising characteristics.

            Your talking to a man that would play Nani in the hole, I have never proclaimed my managerial style is logical.

            1. Quinny___
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 2 months ago

              Lol. I have never seen much of William other than 1 full game and when he came on for portugal a couple of times.

              You sound like an exciting manager

              1. The Nuttmxn
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 12 Years
                9 years, 2 months ago

                I vouch for him.

                That I am, there would never be a boring time at my club, I'm also a fantastic man to man coach.

    3. footballoholic
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Schneiderlin and I'm a Chelsea fan

      1. Long Juan Silva
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        ^

    4. Hakuna Juan Mata
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Neither of them are good fantasy assets. They won't get you any more than 3 points unless they get lucky.

        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        *as a BPL manager*

      1. The Nuttmxn
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        I think the question is more real life manager based.

      2. Quinny___
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        The question has nothing to do with Fantasy football

      3. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Doh

    5. Wilshere Knowledge
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Matic the better DM, but Morgan can play with another defensive midfielder.

      Depends on whether you have another good DM, but I'll say Matic.

      1. Lucy.
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Er have you seen Schneidetrlin's tackle and interception stats?

        1. Wilshere Knowledge
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          Yes, but in a lesser team where you'd expect the numbers to be higher. Morgan also played with Wanyama and now Schweini and Carrick, as opposed to the lone DM. And if we going by stats, that would make Coquelin the best... 4.25 interceptions per 90 last season, compared to Morgan's 2.59.

          I think Matic's form hasn't been at the best in the last 6 months, but he is still the best DM in the league, imo.

          1. Camp No No
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 2 months ago

            No significant difference in possession between Southampton and Chelsea. Manchester United has way more possession than either, and Schneiderlin still has way more tackles + interceptions than Matic (7.3/90 v 5/90).

            1. Wilshere Knowledge
              • 11 Years
              9 years, 2 months ago

              Similar possession doesn't mean they come under similar pressure.

              Tackles and interceptions don't make on player better than another.

              However, if you prefer Morgan, that's preference.

    6. Moin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Matic

    7. Doolittle
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Probably Schneiderlin, I think Matic is good but vastly overrated. Busquets wipes the floor with both.

      1. Quinny___
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Pity about busquets personality. Quality player no doubt but he's on my list of players id love to punch.

        Some of the dives, faking injury and antics in general are laughable.

        1. Doolittle
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          Oh certainly, thoroughly unlikeable, but phenomenal player.

    8. Camp No No
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Schneiderlin.

    9. Lucy.
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Schneiderlin...
      ... 🙁

  6. merin
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Who would you bench for GW4?

    A) Payet
    B) Wilson

    1. Kings of Lyon ★
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      A

    2. footballoholic
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Payet!

  7. Doolittle
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Sky Sports News HQ ‏@SkySportsNewsHQ now8 seconds ago
    BREAKING: Juventus sign Juan Cuadrado on season-long loan from Chelsea #SSNHQ

    1. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Cheers.

    2. Long Juan Silva
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      They were always gonna get one of Ramires, Willian, Oscar or Cuadrado.

      Disadvantage of the transfer market still being open when the season starts, they'll just pick the one who doesn't play because he'll want to go.

    3. Cpt Crunch Scott talent
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      As a huge Viola fan this sucks the big one. Though I don't blame Cuadrado for wanting titles.

      1. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Oh you play?

        1. internal error
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          😆

        2. iCon
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          😆

          You are without a shadow of a doubt the funniest horse I've ever met!

      2. The Enlightener
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Paul Silverthorne, is that you?

    4. HuttonDressedasLahm
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Bargain 🙂

  8. Somalion
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Sky sources understand West Brom have rejected an improved bid of £22m from Tottenham for Saido Berahino.

    1. Wilshere Knowledge
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Sky Sports News HQ ‏@SkySportsNewsHQ 3m3 minutes ago
      BREAKING: West Brom reject improved bid of £22m from Tottenham for Saido Berahino #SSNHQ

      It moves quick! 😆

      1. Somalion
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Yes indeedy 😉

        £22 million though 😯

    2. internal error
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      25 should do it

      1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Imagine how many more CBs Pulis could buy with that wonga

        1. The Nuttmxn
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          Oh my days!

      2. Somalion
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Very steep price...

    3. Camp No No
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      They reject that silly money for a player who hardly fits in their manager's tactics at all? I bet they're just milking Spurs for a better price. The deal is as good as done.

      1. Somalion
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Agreed. 100% finished as soon as Rondon came in.

  9. Rupert The Horse
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    I've got the meat sweats.

    1. Kings of Lyon ★
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      5 guys will do that to you 😉

      1. Business Dog
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        😯

      2. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Ahaha. This is great.

    2. The Enlightener
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Remember when we used to raise the roof, Diane?

  10. ZTF
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Guzan (Myhill)
    Darmian Muniesa Kolarov (Williams) (Oxford)
    Sanchez Redmond Silva Payet (Wanyama)
    Wilson Aguero Lukaku

    I have enough for Redmond - Mahrez and Oxford - Gomez over the next two weeks as long as they don't rise too much. Good to go?

    1. BERGKOP
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Why would you get rid of Redmond? I'd prefer Payet -> Mahrez / Chadli / Ayew / Coutinho

    2. Firmy
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Your team seems fine, Redmond will get you returns but if your set on Mahrez then thats your choice he will rise, Lukaku has rubbish fixtures i like Dioufs over Lukaku then you can use the difference to upgrade Wanyama to Mahrez...

  11. Long Juan Silva
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Brady's dead-ball delivery >

    1. Ayew Serious
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Only us irish understand its best in the bpl easily

    2. ZTF
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Brady is awesome

    • 9 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    What's the best strategy to go far in cup starting in GW18?

    1. Ayew Serious
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Pick the best team you can every week

    2. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Start a new team

    3. Valar(Keith)
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Pretend it dint start and just ignore the right hand side of your screen while on the fpl page.

    4. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Buy a WC every week.
      Extra random this season with chips.

  12. fireblasters
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    RMT for GW4 and subseuent ones...(used WC :P)
    Guzan
    targett, azpi, kolarov
    mahrez, coutinho, pedro, sterling
    wilson, diouf, aguero(C)

    romero ayew, francis, monreal

    ITB 0.5

    Any changes suggested??
    Thank you 🙂

    1. RustyBz
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Too much money spent on keepers & subs.

      Targett has a very short FPL lifespan left.

      Rest looks solid, although I'd like Silva/YYT over Sterling

  13. Arsenal USA FC
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    WC now if team needs it or wait till Intl Break?

      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Use it if you need to

    1. nad
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      When you need to WC, WC.

      1. Lateriser 12
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        This.

    2. internal error
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      int break tends to ruin me with injuries

    3. Cpt Crunch Scott talent
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Now but pay extra attention to those that is probable risers in the international break.

      1. Arsenal USA FC
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Can you elaborate please. Are you saying add people who may rise during the period?

        1. Cpt Crunch Scott talent
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          I'm saying that you should have that in mind but not at the cost of what you really want.
          If you have a 50/50 situation between 2 players, that might sway you in the direction of the one you think stand a good chance to rise considerably in the international break.

          1. Cpt Crunch Scott talent
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 2 months ago

            For example. Shaq has only 90k ownership and a favourable fixture coming up gw4.
            If you think hewill do well in gw4 and he does, he might rise a couple of times in the interantional break.
            Though he might not be the best example as he then has Ars in gw5.

  14. Firmy
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Where's the sun??? Need some advice fellow FF manager's
    I was wondering who to swap Depay for or should i leave team until International break with 2FT

    Butland-(McCarthy)

    Darmian Naughton B.Davies (Oxford-Richards)

    Hazard Mahrez Depay Silva (Redmond) Depay>???Shaqiri? Payet? Yaya Coutinho?
    Diouf Aguero Gomis

    0.9 in bank

  15. Hands Guber
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Seriously considering taking a -4 to do Rooney to Costa this week. Have Defoe and Aguero (C) already (already did Kosc to Sagna)

    Team would be:

    Butland
    Gomez/Cedric/Sagna/Azpil
    Depay/Mane/Mahrez
    Costa/Defoe/Aguero(C)

    Ruddy/Ritchie/Payet/Morgan

    Any thoughts?

    1. RustyBz
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      No hits

  16. Transfer Tips
    Far Queue
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Allow me the indulgence of a post, my compatriots. I am one of you, if not in contribution, in spirit at least. Consider this my first comment or post, although I have posted all of once before. (some of you might remember a seemingly inebriated soliloquy)

      There are a number of contributors and posters, little and large, the scouts, the regulars, the known and frequent, and the unknown and infrequent.

      There are seemingly always debates about learnings from previous seasons of FPL, don’t WC early, WC early; don’t take hits, take hits; form over fixtures, quality over form; fixtures over quality. All seemingly coherent and contradictory at the same time taken as a whole. One size does not fit all and many other such platitudes.

      My learnings from FPL have been as below –
      1) There is no learning
      2) At times WCs work, at times hits work, at times they don’t. At times drafting in players work, at times sticking to quality works. There are no rules

      HOWEVER, I have serious views on how a large number of folks seemingly manage their transfers and expectations. Read on:

      A football match is a series of discrete events. Frequently decided by one discrete event or another, eg: a Raheem sterling outstretched leg connecting with the ball, or a linesman ruling offside incorrectly when Aaron Ramsey scores. Entire matches, player evaluations can swing on some fairly unique circumstances.

      Unlike say basketball or cricket, where the runs or points are high and therefore more predictable, a particular football match is more difficult to predict. Some might say arsenal at home against west ham is a 3-0 scoreline waiting to happen. But what they forget is that west ham will play on the counter attack, and have chances to score, the way bournemoth did against west ham away. Or how west brom against man.u away is an opportunity to not play a west brom keeper, forgetting that west brom would park the bus and the goalkeeper may make up in save points, and heaven knows what happens if a penalty save also ensues!

      What’s the point of all the above? Knee jerk transfers have to be avoided; points one week does not mean points the next; folks who say I took a -8 hit to bring in silva and aguero, (but drop say hazard and sterling) forget that sterling and haz are as likely to score based on the points above, of an inherently unpredictable game.

      I hear you ask me, but then if it’s purely a game of luck, how do mark, ville ronka, triggerlips et al manage to score well season after season? The answer is – the longer the set of events, the less random they become and more predictable. It is likely that over the course of a season, Chelsea will concede the fewest goals and man city score the highest. Therefore ask yourselves when you transfer out an azpi or ivan because of chelsea’s weakness thus far, three games in, is that really a measured short term, mid term or long term approach? Probably not. Therefore over the course of a season, you maximize your opportunity to win by playing the best possible way, i.e, almost like a poker player, playing the odds correctly. Limited or no knee jerking. Examples:

      Wilson has scored a hat trick this week. Has great fixtures. Bring him in? Okay, maybe, but don’t sack off after two goalless performances in the next two games; because he might very well score in the third.

      City three attackers: YES! If you can afford it. They always score goals, they’re in form and have fixtures. Removing sterling after a game AFTER having brought him in two games back? Knee jerk. Saving a transfer and making two free to upgrade to silva and coutinho, from sterling and chadli? Much better… Play the odds. Play logically, have patience, and remember: there are no rules.

      The most important thing that I want to end on: when all other things are equal: go quality. This is the most important factor IMO. That people miss. Silva is the darling now, where Hazard isn’t. The point is both are outstanding quality who are guaranteed starters for nailed on teams in attacking roles. Keeping hazard is a quality decision, the way keeping sanchez is, or aguero, or costa when fit. Keeping Walcott: that’s an example of a poor decision: middling quality, explosive finishing, but lack of guaranteed playing time: any serious arsenal fan could have told you this at the season beginning. A lot of FPL success is only about logic, intelligence and football understanding, not to mention patience.

        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        dear God, that's a long post.

        1. Camp No No
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          But at least it makes a point that is essentially correct.

            • 9 Years
            9 years, 2 months ago

            Took me a while to read it but can't disagree on anything, it's brilliant and absolutely correct.

          • 9 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          However, one of the best I've seen here recently. The part about Hazard filled me with a lot of hope, thank you, kind sir.

      1. walkman666
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        For an essay like that, you should be a member...Go donate and then you can have your name in lights along with these dissertations!

      2. Kings of Lyon ★
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        This post is just fantastic ! I echo all your words above. Have faith in your choices, the cream always rises !

        With posts and logical thinking like this you should post more often !

      3. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        In summary - don't knee-jerk and pick quality nailed-on players 🙂

        1. Ryan
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          'Pick players that play' is still a rule that will never go out of fashion.

      4. Lateriser 12
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Great post sir.

      5. walkman666
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Good lessons learned. In your next chapter, you can perhaps add in the strategy of team value accumulation, which makes some of these judgments a little more complex (e.g. knee jerking is sometimes appropriate to make a quick buck -- but at what "cost" in points?!?).

      6. nad
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        As Harvey Price would say himself - "Love it"

        Great post. 🙂

      7. The Enlightener
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Well done, kind sir. Some valid points ye maketh.

      8. Pepin - RIP Absinthe
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Nice post. I guess you read that book, what's it called?

        1. Camp No No
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          Introduction to probability?

      9. iCon
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        You forgot the most important factor IMO...a good old dollop of luck!

        Good post though!

      10. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        I loved it. Doolittle, watch your back.

      11. walkman666
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        My fave part:

        ..."Unlike say basketball or cricket, where the runs or points are high and therefore more predictable, a particular football match is more difficult to predict...."

        So true. This sport has so few goals that it is a tricky fit into the typical world of fantasy sports. In the US, baseball, basketball, hockey and even American football have more scoring, measurable player stats, and predictable outcomes. This makes FPL quite tricky and interesting, and it does require more patience given how the average number of goals in a game is like 2 (2.5?).

      12. Doolittle
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Excellent post!

      13. NATSTER
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Great post. Choosing quality players is the first step.

        If you can choose proper timing to play each player, that will edge.

      14. Sollado14
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        This = Great post!!

      15. Bezzer
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Form is temporary, class is permanent!

      16. Sheeeit
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Amazing post. Top marks for fantastic use of the English language throughout.

      17. Del Griffith
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Wise words, its taken me years of playing fpl to learm to calm the old jerky knee syndrome. A certain amount of patience is key to a wiining strategy.

        Love the name btw...F*rck U ! haha brilliant

        PS> Would love to know your thoughts on the latest bandwagon thats being jerked in this week. A certian Mr Pedro... quality or ......

          • 11 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          "latest bandwagon" "being jerked" surely you can deduce the answer yourself?

          1. Del Griffith
            • 12 Years
            9 years, 2 months ago

            not all bandwagons are worth jumping on though. Especially 9.5M priced ones

      18. grapesland
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Excellent

      19. Beavis
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Very well written, thoroughly enjoyed it.

        *waits patiently for Ruth's long winded reply*

      20. A-VB
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Fantastic one..

        I agree to all the points you've put forward, implementing those myself this season, at least have managed to do it till now despite all that's been happening.

        Kudos, would like to read more like this one..

      21. CrouchDown
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        I don't agree with this entirely, I think that knee jerking is unavoidable in order to get form players in( the most important thing in fantasy football IMO). Yes Chelsea might concede the fewest goals in the league this season but they are clearly out of sorts atm so going by form and Chelsea's slow defensive start to the season in the past few years can you really say that Ivanovic > Kolarov isn't a logical move? No such thing as a season keeper IMO the secret to a good rank is having the right players at the right times and not depending on their quality irrespective of their form/fixtures.

        1. CrouchDown
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          I agree that form is temporary class is permanent but my point is that temporary can be a long enough time to lose a lot of ground in fpl.

        2. juggos
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          Completely agree with you. Timing and much luck is key to a strong FPL season

      22. Pompel
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        When will you defend your dissertation?

      23. prata
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        just as it is

      24. Scotch333
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Seems sensible on the surface however if this was true, it would be possible to win with a basically static team varying only because of injuries and maybe fixture trends (like long series of fixtures). As we all know it is not the case.
        This is forgetting that this game rests on mainly one thing which is the money constraint (give 200m to everyone on GW1 and this game is irrelevant as you would just buy the quality players for the reasons listed above). What makes or break a season is the selection of the right player for the right budget. For high budget it is probably qualityplayer but for low value player it is about form and mainly form and at this end of the day this is about knee jerking (think ulloa, naismith last year)
        Money it is always about money. If for no other reason knee jerking builds value...

        1. Dino
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          Rediculous theory and I do wish some of those reinforcing this bull would do so with some solid facts like team value of top 10k v team value of 10k to 20k come the end of the season. Even this wouldn't prove that knee jerk in and taking hits is required to do well but to me it seems mostly poorer playersthat play like this.

          1. Malcolm Tucker for England …
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 13 Years
            9 years, 2 months ago

            3 days ago, fella......

            1. Dino
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 15 Years
              9 years, 2 months ago

              "Notify me of replies"

      25. The Hindu Monkey
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        A wonderful post, with the slight caveat that sometimes price rises can dictate transfers. Which is another post entirely, but still a relevant point. If price changes didn't exist, knee jerk transfers would be insane. As opposed to merely daft.

        There is no way the arsenal midfield are going to continue scoring an average of 0.33 goals per match between them, as a case in point. Yet I have already seen countless get shot of them now posts. Playing three city is fine, but if you've got no Chelsea, arsenal or united to do so you've going to get found out.

      26. Caine & Co.
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        best comment ever

      27. Fred54
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        This is good stuff, but someone of us are uber trigger happy.

        (WC and 3 hits!)

      28. Moin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Great Post, Now get a Grav!

      29. FantaCity
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Beautifully written too, I might add

      30. John t penguin
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Very enjoyable read, didn't preach, flowed well and entice the reader to keep reading.
        I now await an individual to tell you how wrong you are

      31. mookie
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Great post, love the "no rules" approach.
        The only thing i disagree on is "Keeping hazard is a quality decision." The way i see it: i get 100m to get as many points as i can, i have to bench a minimum of 16.5m which leaves me with 83.5m to score me points. Let's say Hazard will repeat his previous season point tally(i'd say this would be a good guidline), an average of 6.1ppg. For 11.5m that's 1.88m/point. If i were to invest 83.5m in similar value players i'll end up with an average of 44.3 pts+6.1 (Hazard captain)= 50.4pts on average each GW. I'm pretty sure that wouldn't be enough for a top 10k finish.

        What i'm trying to say is that Hazard is not good value and unless a high % of the players that matter are captaining him i won't get him. Did okay last season hardly owning him while he was cheaper and wasn't bothered much about his high ownership(~50% if i recall correctly and a lot more amongst the active teams)

        That said i'm doing worse than 50pts/GW so far. My team is not yet set up for value because i was completely out of loop preason and i just picked who i thought was the best attacking option from the top teams and got what i could in defence.

        P.S. If it wasn't for Hazard being top of captain poll in GW1 i would've been the extremly happy owner of Fabregas(6pts),Kolarov(31pts) and one of Skrtel(18pts) or Darmian(20pts) (was undecided between the two) instead of Mings(0), Coates(1) and Hazard whom i sold in the meantime. Only a small regret cause it's easy to be wise now. Hazardless in GW1 when most are captaining him could've gone really bad.

      32. Long Juan Silva
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Indeed.

      33. areid432
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Should I triple captain aguero this week?

    • teddy.
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Who to bench?

      A) Ayew
      B) Gomis
      D) Payet
      J) Lens

      1. Arsenal USA FC
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Payet

        1. teddy.
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          Even though I've got double Swansea?

        2. Stats Don\'t Lie
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          This

      2. Lateriser 12
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        D

    • Arsenal USA FC
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Hazard or Pedro on WC?

      1. RustyBz
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Hazard, unless you can make really good use of that extra cash with Pedro

      2. jomikijiq
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Pedro

      3. teddy.
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Pedro. Live a little!

      4. Trae44
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        i'm with pedro on mine

      5. Arsenal USA FC
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Means Huth to STaylor or Targett

      6. WINNING!
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Pedro now and make plans for Hazard later.

    • ZTF
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Guys someone please give some feedback to my team above? Thanks

    • Nickk
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      I seem to be the only one on here with him, but my differential is Wijnaldum. Hes alright for me. Much better than Hazard anyway.

      1. Ayew Serious
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Please to Finally Michu has him I think

      2. Wilshere Knowledge
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        He's looked good, the fixtures however...

    • Dynamic Duos
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      If anyone is going to turn Arsenal form around, who will it be and not Wenger.?

      1. ZTF
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Sanchez

      2. Ayew Serious
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Whos the ref next week?

      3. RustyBz
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        A decent striker

      4. El-Kloppico
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Wenger's arrogance..
        If Cech is injured. Arsenal will finish 7th.

    • Wouter
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Is Berahino really this good? Or just another overhyped English talent?

      1. Wilshere Knowledge
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        I like him.

        £15-£20m player minus the English tax, imo.

      2. Arsenal USA FC
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        I don't see it

      3. Ayew Serious
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Overhyped, no
        Overpriced, Yes

      4. Heydudes13
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Don't think he's 22m good. No chance.

      5. Long Juan Silva
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Somewhere in between. A lot of his goals were penalties.

      6. The Enlightener
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        He's pretty good. Still very young as well.

      7. Somalion
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Gonna be the next Messi after Sterling fam.

      8. Lucy.
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        He's £15m-£18m good, not £22m+ good.

      9. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        If he was - say - French, his price-tag would be nowhere near this high

      10. RustyBz
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Would be worth £5million if he wasn't English

      11. Kings of Lyon ★
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Hes good but Chelsea just signed Pedro for £22m theres no way Berahino is worth the same as Pedro

        1. Long Juan Silva
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          Many would say that Pedro was undervalued though

        2. Wilshere Knowledge
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          English and 22 v Spanish at 28, though.

          1. Somalion
            • 14 Years
            9 years, 2 months ago

            Depends on whether you prefer talent to potential.

            1. Wilshere Knowledge
              • 11 Years
              9 years, 2 months ago

              There's also potential slow down in older players, and sell on value.

              1. Somalion
                • 14 Years
                9 years, 2 months ago

                True, but potential attitude problems and injury hampering the development of youths 😉

          2. nad
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 2 months ago

            ^ this

      12. Doolittle
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        I don't see it myself, doesn't look anything special at all to me.

        1. Doolittle
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          And let's not forget that he's not a 16 year old wonderkid - he's 22. It's still young, but he's nowhere near the level to suggest he's going to become anything special.

          1. Camp No No
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 2 months ago

            He had a streak of good scoring last season, which probably makes most of the price, but has not yet provided any proof that it wasn't an anomaly as he has not been able to replicate that form. And even that "form" was partly penalties.

      13. Hairy Potter
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        He's decent, but not worth that much. I'd rather have Austin and he's available for £15m, which is high.

    • gunnerboy
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      How's this team looking chaps?

      Butland

      Azpi / Mert / Cedric

      Hazard / Yaya / Ozil / Mahrez

      Aguero (c) Benteke Wilson

      All set to go or do I need to throw in a -4 somewhere?

      Thanks a lot

      1. Ayew Serious
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        All set

      2. AverageJoe
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Looks good, nothing in need of immediate change imo

        1. gunnerboy
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          Thanks pals

      3. Sollado14
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        All set...What's your bench like?

    • Kolarov Fpl Legend
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      I know i can not have them all but Benteke is really good and have a excellent home fix.
      My front 3 is Aguero - Gomis - Diouf , so it would be crazy to dump 1 off them?

      1. Lateriser 12
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        It wouldn't be crazy to dump Gomis i say.

        1. Kolarov Fpl Legend
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          that is what i m thinking

        2. Pepin - RIP Absinthe
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          +1

      2. Ayew Serious
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        I have Ayew, so I can fit in Tekkers

        1. Kolarov Fpl Legend
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          i have Ayew too

          1. Ayew Serious
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 2 months ago

            Gomis to Tekkers all day

            1. Kolarov Fpl Legend
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 2 months ago

              Yea i think i m gonna do it,just have to wait until Saturday.
              Thanks for opinions

      3. Stats Don\'t Lie
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        If U have ayew, dump gomis.

      4. jomikijiq
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Have the same problem. I'll probably Gomis>Benteke for GW6. Thinking also about Coutinho instead.

      5. NATSTER
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Swansea regularly score against United.

        But agree that Benteke has more potential over the four.

    • ZTF
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Norwich want Alex Pritchard. Could be a good cheap option...

      1. El-Kloppico
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        They could have Pilchard for €1 🙂 🙂 🙂

    • mrpink32
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Fallen well behind so wildcard is what im thinking- honest opinion lads appreciated;

      Migs mccart
      Kolor gomez darm richards s taylor
      Pedro alexis mahrez coutinho westwood
      Aguero gomis wilson

      1.7 itb

      1. Stats Don\'t Lie
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        -___-

        1. mrpink32
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          What do you mean by that- screams "meh" to me? If so how could i inprove? Cheers!

    • Stats Don\'t Lie
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Anyone else worried by having insufficient pool and city coverage?

      1. Ayew Serious
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        No Aguero and Benteke cover all

        Kolarov is just a Bonus

      2. AverageJoe
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Only pool im considering is gomez atm

      3. Pepin - RIP Absinthe
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        I've got 5, so I feel OK.

        1. Stats Don\'t Lie
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          I only have kun...

      4. gunnerboy
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Aguero, Yaya and Benteke for me. Id love a City defender but not prepared to -4 for it so a Watford consolation goal would be lovely

        1. Stats Don\'t Lie
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          Yeah. Aguero hattrick in 3-1 win would be great.

      5. ZTF
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        I have 3 City and will soon have Gomez. So no, I'm worried about no Chelski

      6. BERGKOP
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Don't have Pool and fine with it for now. You should be concerned about no city coverage

    • Nickk
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Does my team need surgery?
      Currently on 145 points. I know that's good so far, but my lack of Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool players worries me.

      Butland / Ruddy
      Kompany / Fonte / Cresswell / Coates / Elphick
      Wijnaldum / Depay / Silva / Chadli / Ayew
      Defoe / Kane / Pelle

      Does it need changing guys?

      Thank you.

      1. FIFA King
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        I'd Downgrade Kane to Benteke and upgrade Defoe to Diouf IMO

        Still early to judge Depay and Wijnaldum