128 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. mookie
    • 12 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    Lewis Hall worth a bench spot.

    1. Deulofail
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Eddie Howe quote?

      1. mookie
        • 12 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        Haha, most have worse players on their benches. I'd happily take him over my VdB and VdV.

  2. Amartey Partey
    • 6 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    It’s getting difficult to ignore Bowen.

    1. Jimmy B
      • 11 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Difficult to fit him in too. Realistically that spot/price point is between him Mbeumo and Gordon and 99% have Mbeumo and would be reluctant to lose him.

    2. Deulofail
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Possibily Mbeumo > Bowen in GW14

  3. FPL Virgin
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    Well done Marco Silva. That's the way you do it. None of this "they decide between themselves on the pitch" nonsense.

  4. Saka White Rice
    • 11 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    Can anyone fault this GW12 WC? Other than picking Haaland over Salah

    Sanchez
    Konate RAN Veltman (Mykolenko VanDBerg)
    Palmer Saka Mbeumo Semenyo (Rogers)
    Haaland Jackson Cunha

    1. bobson5
      • 15 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      If it's possible to do Rogers to Dibling or a 4.4/4.5 mid to do Konate --> Gabriel I think I would do that

  5. JÆKS โญ
    • 10 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    Are people not a bit too quick on dumping Haaland to free up funds for Salah?

    Dont get me wrong, Salah is a great player and great pick, but take away his 2 penalties, and this would have been his last scores:

    2,6,2,3,6,10

    1. Captain Mal
      • 1 Year
      1 year, 12 days ago

      When you play for a good team, you are more likely to win penalties.

      1. JÆKS โญ
        • 10 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        That is true, but Haaland is on pens too ๐Ÿ™‚

        1. Captain Mal
          • 1 Year
          1 year, 12 days ago

          Each penalty grants Haaland 4 points and Salah 5.

          1. Deulofail
            • 9 Years
            1 year, 12 days ago

            It's less than 1pt difference if you take bonus into account and that Salah is more than twice as likely to miss a pen than Haaland (which is -2 pts and -6 bps), based on career records. Haaland might even get more points for pens than Salah after that is all factored in, but I can't be arsed to work it out.

    2. Deulofail
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Unless you are going with all 4 players (in which case, good luck to you), you have to pick at least one of Haaland, Salah, Palmer and Saka to exclude. Though I do think people are taking the decision lightly, as if Haaland's hattricks are over, I do think it's a fairly obvious choice come GW12, given Haaland's price, the fixture swings and the minimal points difference.

      It's within the realm of believability that Haaland is outscored by all three players from 12-17 or even beyond, so why spend so much money on him? The extra money could get you an upgrade to one or more of Son, Havertz, Jackson, Gabriel, TAA, etc, or improve the bench, as a additional cushion.

      The question is if it's worth the WC, FTs or hits to switch things up, and then maybe switch things down again to get him back in. In many cases, I think it probably isn't. For me, it probably will be, as I might have 5FTs for GW12.

      Salah, I would say is the second most obvious choice come GW12, basically for the same reason: high price while other heavy-hitting options are ripe for the picking.

      1. JÆKS โญ
        • 10 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        Good arguments yep, cheers!

    3. jack88
      • 4 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Those who have done well so far (under 200k) most of them Didn't Have haaland.. You can't go up playing safe

      1. Deulofail
        • 9 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        What does this mean? Surely most people in the top 200k have owned Haaland before now.

        1. RedLightning
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 15 Years
          1 year, 12 days ago

          Many of them will have triple-captained him in Gameweek 2 before selling him later.

          Half of the teams in the current overall top twenty don't have Haaland, and neither do half of the teams in the top ten of the FFS Live Hall of Fame.

          Nearly all the teams in The Great and The Good have Haaland, but none of them are currently in the top 200k.

          1. Deulofail
            • 9 Years
            1 year, 12 days ago

            Okay. How about the top 200k, as per the comment? ๐Ÿ˜†

            Those in the top 200k who TCed Haaland had to own him to do that.

            Those who own Haaland and are not in the top 200k are irrelevant.

            1. RedLightning
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 15 Years
              1 year, 12 days ago

              Quite a few of the top 200k are there because they triple-captained Haaland in Gameweek 2.
              And if they don't own him now, it's because they sold him later and avoided his blank spell.

              Some of the top 200k just got lucky this season, but the top ten of the FFS Hall of Fame all have outstanding FPL histories, so they know what they're doing.
              Five of the top ten in the FFS Hall of Fame don't currently own Haaland, and they are the only ones in the top ten of the FFS Hall of Fame that are currently in the overall top 230k (Ben Crellin at 226k and the other four at 106k or better).

              One reason for none of the Great and Good currently being in the top 200k is probably because many of them continued to captain Haaland through his blank spell but failed to triple-captain him in Gameweek 2.

              1. Deulofail
                • 9 Years
                1 year, 12 days ago

                I really don't see the relevance of people the outside the top 200k you keep bringing up lol.

                "Some", "many" and "quite a few". It's all a bit made up tbh.

                According to LiveFPL 80% of teams 100-200k owned Haaland last GW, so it's safe to say that the overwhelming majority of people who've done well have done it with Haaland, not without, contrary to Jack's comment.

                I don't think you read Jack's post, because that's what I was responding to. I don't understand the relevance of your replies, though, so it could be a me issue.

          2. Deulofail
            • 9 Years
            1 year, 12 days ago

            Interesting that half the teams in the top 20 own Haaland despite the hypothesis that only those without Haaland can get to the top!

            1. RedLightning
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 15 Years
              1 year, 12 days ago

              Looking at the overall top five,
              #1 has used all four of his chips, TC'ing Haaland in GW9 and still has him.
              #2 has used three chips, TC'ing Haaland in GW2 and still has him.
              #3 has only used two chips, TC'ing Saka in GW1 and selling Haaland in GW5.
              #4 (Hussein Noun) has used three chips, TC'ing Haaland in GW2 and selling him in GW4.
              #5 (Dudu Lio messi) has only used one chip, a Free Hit in GW3, the only week in which he owned Haaland.

              So quite a variety, but it shows that some of the top 200k are there because they have already used multiple chips, and that is another reason why the Great and Good currently aren't.

              1. Deulofail
                • 9 Years
                1 year, 12 days ago

                Why are you still talking about the Great and the Good hahaha. Maybe give yourself a hot topic so you can post all this stuff on a relevant thread ๐Ÿ˜›

                1. RedLightning
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 15 Years
                  1 year, 12 days ago

                  Because they aren't currently in the top 200k, despite having superior FPL histories to many of those who are, and seeing how this relates to their ownership of Haaland.
                  And comparing what they have been doing this season with what the current top 200k have been doing.
                  Which is partly down to ownership/captaining/triple-captaining/selling of Haaland, partly to chip usage, partly to the selection of the other players in their squads and to their captaincy and benching decisions, and partly to luck and skill.
                  We should be able to learn something from those who have great FPL career histories as well as from those who are doing well this season.

                  This all relates to Jack88's comment about Haaland and the top 200k. I didn't check whether or not his assertion that most of the top 200k didn't own Haaland was true, but I did note his ownership by some other relevant groups that I could check, such as the overall leaders, the Hall of Fame leaders and The Great and The Good, and it is interesting to see some of the differences between and within them.

  6. Ghost86
    • 9 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    Hello, do we think Liam Delap starts the next game for Ipswich considering his replacement scored 2 goals?

    Debating whether to sell

    1. The 12th Man
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      I have him too. If your not playing against Leicester when will you start him?

      1. Ghost86
        • 9 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        If he starts

  7. Luis Suarez Ate My Homework
    • 14 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    I want to bring in Salah.

    Better to take out A) Rogers or B) McNeil?

    Sanchez Fabianski
    Gabriel TAA Lewis VDB Greaves
    Rogers McNeil Mbeumo Buonanotte Kovacic
    Jackson Haaland Wood

    1. The 12th Man
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      If McNeil is out it’ll be an easy decision for you.
      I think Rogers is a season keeper. McNeil will have a rough Christmas.

      1. Luis Suarez Ate My Homework
        • 14 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        @12th MAN - Agreed, but his next 5 fixtures are promising.

        1. The 12th Man
          • 12 Years
          1 year, 12 days ago

          Yeh if he’s fit for Southampton I’d keep.
          Think I’d be finding a way to shift Kovacic or Buonanotte to Salah.

    2. JÆKS โญ
      • 10 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      How on earth did you end up with that midfield though

      1. Luis Suarez Ate My Homework
        • 14 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        Jaeks:

        Did Saka+Diaz >> Son+McNeil.

        Son was injured, so I transferred him out for Buonanotte on a one week riff. Couldn't afford Palmer and didn't think Saka was going to play.

    3. Deulofail
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Looks like you might be in need of some points, and I think McNeil is more likely to get them if he plays

    4. Make FPL Casual Again
      • 7 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Kovacic at 5.6m is a waste

  8. The 12th Man
    • 12 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    Worth a -4 to get Salah in?

    Son,Watkins > Salah,Wissa/Jiminez/Wood/Larson

    Or
    McNeil, Haaland > Salah, any forward below Watkins.

    1. Flynny
      • 10 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Yes I'd too it. Similar to what I'm looking at below

      1. The 12th Man
        • 12 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        Which one?
        Keep Haaland or Watkins?

    2. JÆKS โญ
      • 10 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      No for me

    3. KeanosMagic
      • 3 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      I've done a similar move (keeping Haaland)

    4. jack88
      • 4 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      No

    5. Winston.
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Next week the first one

  9. Flynny
    • 10 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    Hi....im extremely tempted by the following move for a hit. Is it worth it? Gives me salah palmer and haaland....thanks

    Foden and solanke to salah and jiminez - 4

    Alternative is save ft!

    Flekken
    Gabriel lewis RAN (myko greaves)
    Palmer foden mbeumo Rodgers (semenyo)
    Haaland solanke dcl

    1. JÆKS โญ
      • 10 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Id do it

    2. KeanosMagic
      • 3 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Yep, as above I've done a similar move and we now will have very similar teams! Good luck!

      1. Flynny
        • 10 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        Thanks mate!

  10. FDMS All Starz
    • 10 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    So it has come down to this on WC, which one?

    A) Haaland, Rogers, Johnson, Vandijk
    Or
    B) Cunha, Salah, Son, Mykolenko

    1. Pep bites Kun
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      You're essentially choosing Salah or Haaland. That decision should be yours.

  11. mookie
    • 12 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    I don't get this good fixture run for Wolves. Spurs have better odds to beat Villa than Wolves have to beat Soton next week. You wouldn't say Spurs have a good fixture, would you? And if home to Soton is not a good fixture what about the rest? I don't get it. Good fixtures my arse.

    1. Mr. Eko
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 3 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      People is fixated on fixtures

    2. jack88
      • 4 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Its not about who beats whom. Good fixtures means there might be goals. And we want cunha ait noori goals, assists. We dony care if they lose 3-2 to soton

      1. mookie
        • 12 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        Good luck with that!

    3. FDMS All Starz
      • 10 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Wolves don’t play Southampton next week?

      1. mookie
        • 12 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        They play Palace this week and Soton next week.

    4. Deulofail
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      It's all relative. Still a good fixture for Wolves, and the fact that they are a worse team than Spurs is reflected in the price of their players in fpl.

    5. Studs Up
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      fixture run vs a fixture?...confused now

      1. Tazah
        • 7 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        His point still applies, because the team is trash doesn't mean easy fixtures will make them good all of a sudden

        1. x.jim.x
          • 11 Years
          1 year, 12 days ago

          Are they actually trash or have they just had to play 6 of last season's top 7 in their opening 9 games?

          1. Nuka Girl
            • 9 Years
            1 year, 12 days ago

            Exactly. And still scored some goals. Might expect the output to increase now.

            1. x.jim.x
              • 11 Years
              1 year, 12 days ago

              7th most goals scored despite the worst schedule by a country mile

          2. Jimmy B
            • 11 Years
            1 year, 12 days ago

            They were trash against Brentford too to be fair. Arguably they've played better against the better teams.

            1. x.jim.x
              • 11 Years
              1 year, 12 days ago

              Brentford are a very good side and they put 3 past them

        2. Studs Up
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 5 Years
          1 year, 12 days ago

          as long as their fpl assests deliver, who cares if they lose every match

          1. Jimmy B
            • 11 Years
            1 year, 12 days ago

            It does matter though. If you lose a game then by definition the opponents attacking and defensive players are the better fpl assets. Does depend on the share of points of course for specific players but overall if you're not expected to win a game thats not a great starting point.

            1. Studs Up
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 5 Years
              1 year, 12 days ago

              and by definition, do we expect massive scores at their price points...its all relative.

              1. camarozz
                • 11 Years
                1 year, 12 days ago

                I have both cunha and Alt-Nori and enjoyed last gw immensely .

                Thought we were supposed to enjoy the game

  12. Strike me a Gakpose
    • 12 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    A) Watkins + Saka
    B) Cunha + Salah

    1. Captain Mal
      • 1 Year
      1 year, 12 days ago

      B) have much better short term fixtures

  13. The Big Fella
    • 9 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    Are we expecting a rebound from United this weekend or the usual turgid shite they offer most weekends?

    1. Strike me a Gakpose
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      I’m expecting at least a palmer hat trick

      1. The Big Fella
        • 9 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        This is basically my question. Take a -4 and bring in Palmer this week or wait a week and do it for free.

    2. Mr. Eko
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 3 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Manchester United are cursed - the red devil’s !! God do not like that

    3. Nomar
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Rebound

      1. The Big Fella
        • 9 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        So you think a -4 for Palmer is too much and I should wait until next week?

        1. Mr. Eko
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 3 Years
          1 year, 12 days ago

          So NOW you want Palmer?

          1. The Big Fella
            • 9 Years
            1 year, 12 days ago

            When did I say I don't? My opinion the whole season so far hasn't changed. I wanted to wait and see how this massive Chelsea squad settled before bringing in their assets. I am now bringing in Palmer and plan to bring in Sanchez for the start of their good run.

            1. Tazah
              • 7 Years
              1 year, 12 days ago

              To be fair we knew Palmer would be playing all Chelsea games from start of season when he wasn't in Europa squad, so the arguement doesn't make sense

    4. Captain Mal
      • 1 Year
      1 year, 12 days ago

      A high scoring game looks likely

      1. The Big Fella
        • 9 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        So bring in Palmer for a -4 or not?

        1. Tazah
          • 7 Years
          1 year, 12 days ago

          Do it

    5. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Chelsea have struggled at Old Trafford over the last 10 years

    6. panda07
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Depends on if/when Amorim comes in. The players can't have much respect for Ruud really given he's been the forwards coach and their finishing has actually regressed this season.

  14. HelmutCool
    • 3 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    WC12 opinions.

    Raya/Fabianski

    Robinson/Ran/Hall/Andersen/Okoli

    Palmer/Salah/Saka/Mbuemo/Winks

    Watkins/Isak/Cunha

    Idea is to permabench Winks(if no sudden injuries)
    and play whoever has a decent fixture out of Okoli/Hall/Andersen as third D. (Not like anyone is getting clean sheets nowadays)
    Feel Newcastle has decent fixtures and Isak might be a good differential.

  15. Tazah
    • 7 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    All 4 premiums in a decent team, youre welcome

    Sels, fab
    Konate, Robinson, Lewis, Faes, Roberts
    Saka, Salah, Palmer, Rogers, winks
    Haaland, wissa, Jimenez

    1. Over Midwicket
      • 13 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Define decent..

    2. HelmutCool
      • 3 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      At this stage Mbeumo is a premium.

      1. HelmutCool
        • 3 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        Like the idea though of getting coverage from Wissa.

    3. F4L
      • 10 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      not bad. could say losing out with FTs though, not much to do if you want to keep the 4 indefinitely

      1. Jimmy B
        • 11 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        You're playing at least 4 or 5 cheapies every week. Its working ok at the moment because cleans have dried up so no real incentive to go more expensive back there and cheap forwards are scoring at a similar rate to the more expensive strikers. Neither are likely to last as trends and if anything I'd be concerned that these Cunha and down strikers are all hitting form at the same time. Sods law they'll all revert to what they are at the same time and you've got nowhere to run to without selling a premium which will be a tough call.

        1. F4L
          • 10 Years
          1 year, 12 days ago

          agree, there's been seasons where theres basically nothing under 8mil for strikers. not going cheap myself.

          but the numbers wood (iirc its now 18 in 25) and wissa (16g/a in last 19) are pretty mental. go back to nuno coming in and Wood's ppg will be around 5.5 and now he has pens. can see the appeal

          maybe how good gordon and palmer last year as cheapies is influencing things, they were season keepers so people think the same about the cheapies this season

          1. Jimmy B
            • 11 Years
            1 year, 12 days ago

            Palmer and Gordon were basically talismen for sides challenging for top 6 though. I dont see that with Brentford or Forest who have both been aided of late by some nice fixtures. Realistically Wood isn't getting above 15 goals this season I don't think so he'll drop off at some point.

    4. Pep bites Kun
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Yes, not bad at all. Fulfils a 343 quite decently for now. Decent wc squad

  16. Zinadine_Gerrard
    • 8 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    Need transfer advice. Current team is:

    Flekken (Fab)
    Gabriel TAA RAN (Davis, Aina) mbuemo Palmer Johnson (dibling, semenyo)
    Haaland Watkins wood

    I’ve got 1FT and ITB. Thinking about doing:
    Johnson, Dibling, Haaland, Watkins

    To

    Salah, Saka, Cunha, Wissa

    For -12 points and leaves 0.4 in the bank

    1. Mr. Eko
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 3 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      a -12 !! You wanna follow the herd that bad?!

  17. JÆKS โญ
    • 10 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    Salah rested today, start on the bench

  18. dhamphiir
    • 10 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    LFC line up v Brighton: Jaros, Bradley, Gomez, Quansah, Robertson, Endo, Morton, Jones, Szoboszlai, Gakpo, Diaz
    Subs: Kelleher, Van Dijk, Konate, Nunez, Mac Allister, Salah, Tsimikas, Young, Nyoni

    1. mookie
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      That's all I needed. Farewell Robbo and thanks for nothing!

    2. F4L
      • 10 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      tsimikas first choice ๐Ÿ˜ฏ

  19. Tonyawesome69
    • 6 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    Arsenal XI vs. Preston: Setford; Timber, Saliba, Kiwior, Zinchenko; Jorginho, Merino, Nwaneri; Sterling, Jesus, Martinelli.

    Arsenal subs: Raya, Lewis-Skelly, Heaven, Nichols, Partey, Rice, Saka, Trossard, Havertz.

  20. dhamphiir
    • 10 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    #Chelsea XI to face Newcastle United: Jorgensen; Disasi, Tosin, Badiashile, Cucurella; Veiga, Fernandez; Dewsbury-Hall, Joao Felix, Mudryk; Nkunku

    Bench: Bergstrom, Bettinelli, Colwill, Chilwell, Casadei, Chukwuemeka, Madueke, Palmer, Guiu

    1. F4L
      • 10 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      cheers
      neto injured?

    2. Deulofail
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Dewsbury-Hall summer transfer vindicated!

  21. F4L
    • 10 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    gordon back already

    1. F4L
      • 10 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      *might be striker as well

  22. Tonyawesome69
    • 6 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    Watkins and Rogers given full rest before Spurs (A)

    https://x.com/AVFCOfficial/status/1851696879077331069?t=VrNPFUyi-G3mgdHVT95vuQ&s=19

  23. x.jim.x
    • 11 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    Manchester United lineup: Bayindir, Lindelöf, De Ligt, Martínez, Dalot, Ugarte, Casemiro, Rashford, Garnacho, Bruno, Zirkzee
    Leicester lineup: Ward, Justin, Coady, Okoli, Thomas, El Khannouss, Skipp, Soumaré, McAteer, De Cordova-Reed, Ayew

    Yanited playing 4-4-fackin-2

    1. Deulofail
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Why do you say 4-4-2?

        1. Deulofail
          • 9 Years
          1 year, 12 days ago

          Thanks

  24. F4L
    • 10 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    looking at the line ups, likely

    liverpool
    arsenal
    united
    newcastle
    palace
    southampton
    brentford
    spurs/city

    pretty stacked quarters

    1. Mr. Eko
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 3 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      When is the draw?

      1. F4L
        • 10 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        would imagine today or tomorrow

      2. dhamphiir
        • 10 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        After Tottenham Hotspur vs Manchester City game

  25. camarozz
    • 11 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    No one wants to win the EFL cup for they ๐Ÿ™‚

    1. camarozz
      • 11 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Do they *

    2. Jimmy B
      • 11 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Looking at Brightons team is quite depressing. Why wouldnt you try and win the thing knowing most of the top 4 aren't bothered. At least Newcastle are going for it.

      1. Mother Farke
        • 1 Year
        1 year, 12 days ago

        Here I was thinking Brighton's XI is relatively strong looking? Gruda, for example, is a £25m signing...

    3. F4L
      • 10 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      actually would be nice to see Palace win it (or go far). full strength since first round, wish Fulham did the same.

    4. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Pointless competition when none of the big teams care until the semis and the rest are more bothered about staying in the league than to have a go. Get rid.

      1. camarozz
        • 11 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        Villa could go far but guess CL and another top 4 is priority which I understand. It's sad that's that and the fa cup have gone the same way. Back in last 90s fa cup games were awesome

        1. camarozz
          • 11 Years
          1 year, 12 days ago

          In the 90s *

  26. Pornchef
    • 1 Year
    1 year, 12 days ago

    Start 2 this weekend

    1. Madueke
    2. Rogers
    3. McNeill

    1. Deulofail
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      312

  27. dhamphiir
    • 10 Years
    1 year, 12 days ago

    Manchester City XI | Ortega Moreno, Lewis, Stones, Akanji, Ake, Gundogan (C), McAtee, O'Reilly, Savinho, Nunes, Foden

    SUBS | Ederson, Dias, Kovacic, Haaland, Bernardo, Gvardiol, Wright, Simpson-Pusey, Alfa-Ruprecht

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 6 Years
      1 year, 12 days ago

      Lewis early sub would be nice...*looks at the City bench*

      1. Tonyawesome69
        • 6 Years
        1 year, 12 days ago

        Maybe there's hope...

        "Now we have a problem that we have a lot of injured players and I cannot rotate like I would and I don't want to put much pressure on the young players on this stage for this opponents for the way I play so that's why I have to make a mix for the players, split minutes with 45 minutes-45minutes."

        https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/pep-guardiola-considers-man-city-30255218?s=09