Scout Notes

Scout Scribbles – Townsend Hands Spurs Advantage

Andros Townsend slots home a spot-kick to give Spurs a narrow first-leg lead over Sheffield United in the Capital One Cup semi-final. Edin Dzeko and Stevan Jovetic grab a goal apiece as City sweep aside Hamburg, Marouane Chamakh is on course to turn out for Palace this weekend, whilst Swansea edge closer to snapping up Kyle Naughton from Spurs.

TOWNSEND’S SPOT KICK BLUNTS THE BLADES

Mauricio Pochettino made five changes to his Tottenham starting XI for their Capital One Cup semi-final first-leg clash with Sheffield United last night. Nacer Chadli was absent for personal reasons, meaning that Andros Townsend was handed a chance on the flank, with Harry Kane once again fielded in ‘the hole’ behind Emmanuel Adebayor, who was replaced by Roberto Soldado midway through the second half. After being frustrated for the majority of the match, Spurs finally found the breakthrough, with Townsend giving his side a 1-0 advantage to take into the second leg from the penalty spot.

Post-match, Pochettino was forced to defend his decision to hand Adebayor the captaincy armband for the encounter after the Togo international was booed by some of the home crowd:

“He is one of the three captains. You forget [I named them] at the beginning of the season. I think it is not the moment to explain why. When I took a decision it was seven months ago, I took the decision that Kaboul, Lloris and Adebayor were three captains, seven months ago. It is a long, long time ago that happened. I had no doubts [about making him captain]. I didn’t hear [any bad reaction]. I am focused on the game.”

The Scout Says: Townsend has now registered two goals and an assist in his last five appearances in all competitions, and with Erik Lamela’s calf injury expected to keep him out until mid-February, the England international could be set to profit further over the next few Gameweeks. Indeed, the winger might need to continue that form if Spurs’ future performances continue in the same vein as last night’s, with the north Londoners managing just two shots on target across the 90 minutes against their League One opponents. With both Adebayor and Soldado once again flattering to deceive, and the fans clearly gunning for the former, Kane’s 36.7% ownership will be hopeful that the youngster will be shifted further forward in the coming weeks as he looks to continue the form that has produced six goals and three assists in his last seven league outings.

 

DZEKO AND JOVETIC ON TARGET IN CITY FRIENDLY

Edin Dzeko and Stefan Jovetic were both handed starts and grabbed a goal apiece as Man City overcame Hamburg 2-0 in a friendly in Abu Dhabi. Manuel Pellegrini fielded a backline of Bacary Sagna, Dedryck Boyata, Eliaquim Mangala and Aleksander Kolarov for the encounter, whilst Sergio Aguero was introduced up front with 25 mins left on the clock as he continues to build up his fitness.

However, it wasn’t all smooth sailing for the victors, with Frank Lampard forced off after 20 minutes with a hip problem originally sustained in the warm-up, though Pellegrini played down the problem post-match:

“He was injured in the warm up and then we took him off in the game as a precaution.”

The Scout Says: With Aguero back from injury and Wilfried Bony recently snapped up by the Citizens, it would be fair to say that the pressure was on Jovetic and Dzeko to produce yesterday despite the insignificance of the fixture. The two strikers gave their manager a timely reminder of their capabilities and if either manages to produce again in their FA Cup tie with Middlesborough on Saturday, Pellegrini may well have a partner for Aguero ahead of the following weekend’s vital trip to Chelsea. Whilst the Argentine’s starting role looks untouchable so long as he can remain fit, Jovetic and Dzeko’s lingering presence is likely to have an impact on Bony’s pitch time once he returns from the Africa Cup of Nations, and this continuous competition for minutes could well deprive managers of a reliable mid-price forward option in City’s ranks even if Pellegrini does begin to favour a front two set-up once again.

 

CHAMAKH TIPPED FOR COMEBACK

Reports indicate that Crystal Palace forward Marouane Chamakh is expected to return to action for his side this weekend in their FA Cup clash with Southampton.

The Scout Says: Could Alan Pardew be set for another reshuffle in formation on the back of yesterday’s news? The Eagles boss deployed a 4-3-3 set-up against Spurs in his first league match in charge, then switched to 4-4-2 for last weekend’s trip to Burnley. With his side trailing at half-time, however, Pardew then changed things up again, moving to a 4-1-4-1 formation which in turn sparked a successful comeback. Glenn Murray and new signing Yaya Sanogo have both started one match apiece up front and Chamakh may come into contention as his new manager looks for a consistency of both selection and formation. Certainly, with Palace set on all-out attack mode right now, their budget offensive options appear to be worth considering, though Jason Puncheon and Dwight Gayle’s form and guarantee of starts regardless of formation ensures that they remain the prime assets for the time being.

 

NAUGHTON MOVE To SWANS NEARS COMPLETION

Reports yesterday claimed that Spurs defender Kyle Naughton could seal a move to Swansea as soon as today, after the right back apparently agreed personal terms and passed a medical with the Welsh side.

The Scout Says: At just 4.3 in the Fantasy Premier League game, Naughton’s signature could present managers with a cut-price option in a Swans rearguard who face potentially prosperous encounters with Sunderland, West Brom and Burnley in their next five. The Welsh outfit have tallied a respectable eight clean sheets thus far this season and, despite shipping 11 in just their last four, could now receive a new wave of attention if Naughton’s move does indeed go through. The 26-year-old  certainly looks set to come straight into the reckoning for a starting berth, with Garry Monk seemingly losing confidence in regular right-back Angel Rangel in recent times – the Spaniard was an unused substitute last time out, with Dwight Tiendalli taking his place in the starting XI against Chelsea.

 

 

996 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Mclean as a Whistle
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Where did everybody go?

  2. TorresMagic™
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 15 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Adebayor makes things interesting.

    1. GreenWindmill
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Is that the sound of Doosra's wildcard team being torn up? 🙂

      1. Billy Gilmore
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Na, BAE hasn't been included in Spurs' squad list 😉

    1. Elniñorules
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Tell that to Cesc.

      1. Billy Gilmore
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Helps having all that tall timber to aim for.

  3. President John F. Keninnsie
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    What happened to Hewitt? He was coasting earlier.

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Doing it for the crowd 🙂

      1. President John F. Keninnsie
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        😆 Such a thoughtful guy 🙂

        1. TorresMagic™
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Time to retire very soon.

          1. President John F. Keninnsie
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Yeah you've been around long enough.

            Hewitt should think about it too.

            1. TorresMagic™
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 15 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              *emails Jonty*

              1. President John F. Keninnsie
                • 10 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                😉

          2. Billy Gilmore
            • 12 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            *5 years ago

  4. Elniñorules
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    So...

    Just when we thought there aren't enough good picks from Chelsea, here comes Cauadrado.

    Going to be FPL Gold if he comes. Will probably come in at the same price as Willian as well. 7.5-8?

    1. President John F. Keninnsie
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Loved owning him in WC Fantasy, he was an assist magnet 🙂

      I fear a 8.5-9 price though.

    2. Moin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      maybe in the range of oscar

  5. Trust John
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Thinking of taking a -4 this GW (one week fun with Giroud and Di Maria coming in) - then wildcarding GW after.

    Rest of team is OK - but with bad defence for this GW.

    Sensible idea?

    Or just WC now?

    1. Baggers
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I'd just bring in Giroud and not take a minus

      I don't think LVG knows his best 11 or what formation to play them in at the moment

    2. Man Chest Hair United
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Hard to say without seeing your team. Both punts could easily make up the hit

  6. Top Tips For Climbing The Rankings
    J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 15 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Fantasy Football Scout daily hot topic

    Top Tips For Climbing The Rankings

    Following Triggerlips recent article about climing up the rankings post January I thought I’d use this morning’s daily hot topic to find out where you are in the rankings and what strategy you are deploying to get a better overall rank by Gameweek 38? Hopefully you will be able to pass on some good advice.

    Here’s a quick reminder of his key tips and a link to the article

    http://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/2015/01/21/the-real-fantasy-football-season-starts-now/

    Top 1k….. Pick generic team and let others take the risk
    1-5k ,……..Pick one or two differentials, and look for safe weeks to take a captaincy punt
    5-10k………as above with a few more captaincy punts thrown in
    10-30k…….Look to leave out one of the highly owned stars that may falter, i.e. Diego Costa, Alexis Sanchez or Eden Hazard
    30k plus ….Leave out Aguero and structure your team to take advantage of the extra funds; if he falters you will rapidly rise the ranks.

    I’ll go first .

    I’m in the top 1-5K camp, and have been rattling around this group since Gameweek 11. A good run of gameweeks has seen me enter the top 1K, a bad run has seen my skirt the edges of this group. I agree with Triggerlips tactics for my group and it’s a key reason why I have not tumbled out of the top 5K.

    Keeping a close eye on the generic top 10K is key. My first wildcard was focused on this and got me into the top 1K, after that I drafted in Harry Kane, Charlie Austin and David Silva with an eye on their top 10K ownership and they’ve helped me stay with the pack.

    I’ve also looked to take a few punts as Triggerlips recommends, and by punts I mean low owned players in the top 10K. This is the area I need to improve on as Benteke was simply not up to the task of chief differential over Christmas. Now wildcarded I’m placing my faith in the top 10K template, plus Puncheon and one other. Despite getting only 41 from the first week of my winter wildcard its worth noting that I had 23 pts on my bench. Looks like I got the right players, but to paraphrase Eric Morcambe, not necessarily in the right order. 😉

    My next step following this strategy is considering one of Austin or Silva. Well owned players in the top 10K that I think will decline over the next few gameweeks. In their place Defoe, Bojan, Cazorla and Oscar are among those I have my eye on to be the next rare punts in my template top 10K side. Its tricky enough staying in the top 5K let alone pushing on.

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      What are your thoughts on Kane?

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        For that price I'm happy to keep - but I'd also want to bench for tough games - we saw how that went earlier this month. There are not alot of good striker options currently but when there are I may move on.

    2. buffrey
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Looking at my WC this week. Sticking with most big guns but looking for a differential defence and 4/5th mid. Currently 27k but chasing a ML deficit of 35 ish.

    3. Kings of Lyon ★
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Im 30k plus and there is no way I will go without Aguero. The reason I am 30K plus is because i have went 20 GWs without Sanchez. OR is a bonus to me, what I care about is winning my MLs and i cannot do that without Aguero

      1. Daniel Exeter
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        That's the problem isn't it. Going without one of the big guns, if they don't falter you really are screwed.

      2. Camp No No
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Missing Sanchez is not the reason why you're out of top 30k. He was great for 4 GW's of which 2-3 most everybody missed.

        1. Camp No No
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          And in the whole of the season you could have easily found other players scoring you those points.

          1. Kings of Lyon ★
            • 14 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            ive wnet from 20k to 85k in the last 4 weeks because of no sanchez and poor capt choices

    4. Elniñorules
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I don't see why anyone in top 1 shouldn't take as much risk as someone in 30k and vice-versa. Everyone is pretty much chasing until you are close to winning the game....even then you are. It's a mythical concept developed because of the lust around ranking.

      1. Elniñorules
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        *Top 1k and not top 1 😆 (damn autocorrect)

        1. money face bandwagon
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Agree.

      2. Ruth_NZ
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Agreed. See my post below.

      3. Carlos Kickaball
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Agreed, see my post below too.

        If Jonty had just written, pick the best players whatever your rank, I don't think it would have made much of a hot topic. 😆

    5. ILOVEBAPS
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Nice post. Am in the 1-5k too and have a pretty template team from 2 weeks ago.
      That template seems to have changed somewhat as WCs have been used and fixtures shifted.
      I am contemplating going without Costa and shifting funds to rest of team... Has a big swing one way or the other 😉

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        I was without Costa this week and had a poor gameweek rank but even though his overall top 10K ownership is high most in that group will prefer to captain another and often Hazard. This makes Costa currently not essential. Aguero however will be captained by most owners - that makes him a different proposition. The trend I'm keeping an eye on is Costa captaincy in the top 10K - when that gets to 50% or higher then going without Costa becomes a huge risk for those like us in the top 10K.

        Good luck btw.

        1. Lanley Staurel
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Agree 100%. Im in the same place as you and Smartypants top 10k data is essential to understand the risk or otherwise of not having a top 10k essential player. My view is they arent essential UNLESS people captain them as per your inference above.

          1. The Gambler.
            • 15 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            me too, hovering 1100-1250 after 3 poor scores out of 4.

            great post Jonty

        2. roddick
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Where can one see what the ownership and captaincy in top 10k are?...

    6. President John F. Keninnsie
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I'm dropping like a stone, been in the top 1k for a while but now I'm quite a way out of it. A lack of Costa is my main issue, I think I'll look to get him in ASAP as when he scores more than one goal (which is inevitable when he's not in my team) it's a guaranteed red arrow for me. It's the boring, conservative move but I think it has to be done to avoid slipping even further behind the top 1k.

    7. Raddy
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I think I can be a good example of what happens when you DON'T follow this tactic. Before Christmas I was around 1.9k and really wanted to push into the top 1k/top 500 or so over Christmas. I decided to try and throw in quite a lot of differentials (inc captains) and purposely avoid the big name players, since then (6Gw's), I have plummeted to around rank 60K.

      Moral of this was too many differentials are not worth the risk when you are up in the high ranks. I should have kept a mostly generic team as this article suggests.

    8. Woy of the Wovers
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Top 1k and might pass on Costa. But I not really decided yet so just a hunch.

    9. Holmes
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      No spot for me in top 10k : - )

    10. sully29
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      If you're in the "Look to leave out one of the highly owned stars that may falter" group then leaving out Costa might be a good move.

      After all, there were a lot of logical reason for doing so last week and they still remain this week, despite his haul on the weekend. That haul makes it less likely that other will stick to the plan though, with a few people who traded out last week bringing him back in at a loss this week. In that case sticking with your Costa-less side might not be such a bad idea.

      1. ILOVEBAPS
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        This is what I was trying to get at above but you said much more eloquently.
        Only thing stopping me is I am unsure if his haul signifies an upturn in goals.

        1. Camp No No
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          He's about at the top of his conversion rate right now. Probably going to keep up a pace a bit lower than what he's done in the whole of the season so far. In which case he is easily passable.

        2. sully29
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          I'd at least leave it for another week given that he's up against top opposition next. He can only do so much damage against City and it will give you another week to see how the rest of your team performs.

          I think the damage of not owning Costa last week was amplified by the lack of returns from any other heavy hitter. That won't happen every week.

    11. money face bandwagon
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Arent it feels boring to go for highly owned players just to keep ur rank?

      Dropped to 2.6k now but i am getting the likes of elia kompany carzola defoe falcao kosc

    12. Ruth_NZ
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I don't think it's that tricky at all. My team has beaten the top 1000 in 7 out of the last 8 GWs, often by a considerable margin.

      Do you want to win or do you want to secure a top 2000/5000 finish, that's the question to ask. If you want to win play with freedom and no fear, trust your judgement and live with it if you end up with a 20k ranking. If you want to stay in the top 2k/5k play safe but don't expect to win, Simple.

      Of course as this is my first FPL season and I am just learning how the game works (which I think I'm getting the hang of now) I have less 'investment' in my ranking. But I would never play to preserve a position anything below 1st myself. It's only a game, why not try to win it?

      1. pompeyfan
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        totally agree, was about the post something similar.

      2. A.T
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Hi Ruth. What is your current rank?

        1. Ruth_NZ
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          9 inches. How about yours?

          1. A.T
            • 14 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            I meant your fpl rank

            1. TorresMagic™
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 15 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              😆

      3. Who Let The Dirk Kuyt?
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Agreed, got to take some risks. Second place wins nothing after all ..

      4. Carlos Kickaball
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Wow Ruth, very nice.

        How many points have you got in the last 3 weeks and have you taken any hits?

        I'm in the top 1k and managed 206 (no hits).

        1. Ruth_NZ
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          206 (no hits). Exactly the same as you. 😉

          So what difference did that make to your position? I guess you may have risen 200 or 300 places over those 3 weeks?

          1. Carlos Kickaball
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            I'm up around 3500, despite a red arrow in the first game week of January, it's the reason I'm in the top 1k.

            Can you email me your team? (I won't share your rank or team link on here)

            kickaballcarlos@gmail.com

            1. Ruth_NZ
              • 9 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              As it stands ( will wildcard next GW):

              Forster Guzan
              Terry Baines Chambers (Ars) Wisdom Chester
              Sterling Sanchez Colback Cazorla Hazard
              Austin Costa Kane

              Downing played last GW and has just been replaced by Cazorla.

              I'll email you the link when I get a chance

              1. Carlos Kickaball
                • 10 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                Looks good, my team is currently set up for just the next game week, as I still have the Jan WC in hand.

                Lloris;
                Mertesacker, Ivanović, Bertrand;
                Sánchez (c), Hazard, Di María, Eriksen;
                Costa, Kane, Ings.

                Given;
                Sigurðsson, Wisdom, Hutton.

      5. Dino
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Wow that's amazing, I got the best score in the whole game every week for the last 7 gws! Oh wait my team is linked so you'll be able to see that I didn't, damn it anyway I can't play the Ruth NZ card 🙁

    13. Camp No No
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I think you're wrong about the top 1k strategy. The current top10 is very template, which gives a good chance to those who play their own way to climb up the ranks. Instead of comparing to what the others in the top10k own, just decide your own system to pick the players who are likely to score the most and follow it without knee jerking.

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        I must admit as a player with just one top 1K finish I'm not qualified to offer advice to the real elite top players. Triggerlips is though as he's been there a fair few times.

        I'd definitely like to hear more from those with top 1K finishes to see how they rise up the rankings. My assumption is that you have to take some risks - particularly with captaincy to rise up.

    14. Davros
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      If you're in the top 1k then you don't need to take as many risks as someone further back.
      There's a lot of misunderstanding about the notion of risk and the point at which you take decisions.

      In the top 1k you need a template team and rely on your captain choice as your risk to drive you up.

      1. money face bandwagon
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Haha from my experience risky captain spoil ur rank faster than getting wrong differential.

      2. Ruth_NZ
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        How do you define "risk".

        Wasn't captaining a young striker who gets relatively few shots in the box a risk? 452 of the top 1000 did that last week. Wasn't captaining a player that had only played 24 minutes back from an inury he couldn't possibly be 100% recovered from a risk? 280 of the top 1000 did that last week.

        Compared to those I wouldn't say that captaining the PLs top goalscorer playing against a team he scored a hat-trick against last time he played against them was a risky choice. I'd have said it was sensible and good judgement. But only 52 of the top 1000 did it.

        Fear of what everyone else is doing can make you take very bad decisions. The risk of those bad decisions is only ameliorated by the fact that others are doing the same. But you'll never win anything playing that way.

    15. Clam. ☘️
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I'm at 15k so is having a generic wildcard featuring differentials Puncheon and Cazorla wise to try push to top 10k?

      1. A.T
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        According to this tactic,yes.

      2. Davros
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        As long as they allow you an escape route. I might go with Cazorla to start with but will want to reserve funds to allow a switch to ADM if he kicks on.

        As a result I can't afford puncheon and will play JWP

    16. Davros
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      On further thought, this probably comes down to the point at which you take your risk.

      Putting Costa and Aguero up front is a sensible strategy because they are most likely to score the most points. If you're in the top 1k you can afford to wait and see how others perform. Take Defoe, for instance. If he scores a hat trick in the next match then you might drop Costa to get him in. Very few others near your rank would have had Defoe so you haven't lost anything.

      At the same time, you need to use your judgment. If everybody is jumping on a bandwagon that you think will run out of steam then you can sit smugly knowing that you don't have a low scoring, high ownership player. Take ulloa, as another example. Many jumped on this bandwagon early in the season in wildcards which wrecked the balance of their team.

      So it really comes down to : a high rank gives you the luxury of time to wait and see how assets perform before jumping on the bandwagon.

    17. Who Let The Dirk Kuyt?
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Any advice on how to play it if I'm ranked top 50 , chasing no. 1 ?

      1. TorresMagic™
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Look for the common weaknesses in the top 50.

        1. Who Let The Dirk Kuyt?
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          That's actually good advice, thanks. Will see if I can find them

        2. Ruth_NZ
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Torresmagic offers a very astute observation I think. Because then it becomes an exercise of judgement. Where you see weaknesses it means that in your judgement there are better decisions to be made.

          I don't know where to get the top 50 stats and I'm not going to trawl through the teams 1 by 1. But as an exercise I have had a look at some possible weaknesses in the top 1000.

          1. The assumption that Southampton will be as good defensively in the 2nd half of the season as they were in the first. Also applies to Chelsea but with less reason because Chelsea have a track record that goes back further.
          2. The assumption that Aguero will be as good when he returns as before he was injured. Bit risky to challenge this assumption though because he may well be. More broadly this is the assumption that players will perform similarly in the 2nd half of the season to what they did in the first half. Are there any players you think will improve? Decline?
          2. The assumption that 3-4-3 is the best team structure. Almost all of them do it most weeks unless a striker is injured and Boyd comes off the bench.
          3. The tendency to play safe on captain selections - meaning they will mostly look at captain polls on sites like this and be influenced by them. Funnily enough, the times when there has been the most consensus amongst the top 1000 have tended to be the times when they got it most wrong over the last 8 weeks or so.
          4. Lack of deep knowledge about specific PL teams. Most of them have the stats and the TV but few will actually go to games and even if they do they will only have in depth knowledge of one team. If you know one club well that gives you an edge where selecting their players is concerned. If you have friends that are follow another club closely and go to games, listening to them can give you an additional edge. It's about moving from generic knowledge to specific knowledge.
          5. The tendency to spread coverage. Apart from 3 Chelsea the typical top 1000 team has only one player from any club. That's safer in terms of spreading risk but there could be opportunities from doubling or tripling up on a team (Arsenal?) at the right time.

          A lot of these are debatable - they could equally be regarded as strengths. But there is a tendency to be conservative amongst the top players. If you are able to take a different view on one or two things early enough and trust your judgement that could give you the little edge you need.

          You are a better FPL player than I am so you don't need any advice from me (apart from about Chelsea who I almost certainly have more in-depth knowledge of than you do). But I have found the exercise interesting to do anyway.

          1. J0E
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 15 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Great comment. Point 5 is something I'm particularly looking at as its a tactic that worked well last season (eg getting Sturridge and Suarez, Yaya and Silva/Aguero or this season Pelle and Tadic - worked well at first). Its a key reason I'm considering ditching Silva for Cazorla.

            1. Ruth_NZ
              • 9 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Same idea but I will be more radical. Giroud instead of Aguero and keep Silva. 😉

              Regards Cazorla, Wenger has been under enormous pressure from Arsenal fans about the way he sets up the team. ArsenalfanTV has some really funny after match interviews if you haven't seen them.

              http://arsenalfantv.com/

              So now that he has finally moderated his style and set Arsenal up in an away game the same way he has complained about Mourinho doing for years I can't see him wanting to disturb a team that played so well.

              I think Cazorla will play for as long as he retains form and that Ozil and Walcott will be eased in slowly via cup games and sub appearances. And Oxlade will be affected by their return more than Cazorla.

      2. Davros
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Well done! Go template , make good captain choices.
        I'm a few hundred places behind you but if I'd had the same team as you but make the right captain choices over the past 2 weeks then I'd now be ahead of you.

        1. Who Let The Dirk Kuyt?
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          I feel you bro, been making some bad captain choices myself. I agree with that, captain choices makes such a big difference. Sanchez (C) this week?

      3. Ruth_NZ
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Yep. Forget your ranking and aim to get as many points as you can.

        This is my first season playing FPL so I can't speak from FPL experience. But I can speak from life experience. The moment you start worrying about your position relative to others is the moment you start making compromised decisions. Almost inevitably you'll regret them in the end.

        I have no objection to looking at what others are doing. You might learn something. That's why I come on here. But once you allow fear of being different to take over you may as well hand your team over to the autobot on FFF, set it to track the top 1000 and come back at the end of the season to look at your 10k or 20k ranking.

        The fun, and the challenge of this game is to use your own judgement. There are things to learn - like how to structure a FPL squad (I had no idea about that at all when I began and my initial squad was a nightmare selection with 13 pts Sigurdsson on the bench!) - but once you have the mechanics sorted you should develop your own style. Shouldn't you?

        1. Who Let The Dirk Kuyt?
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Loved the way you summed it up. Had Costa from GW 1 then dumped him for a long period although everyone had him. Brought him back for a bit, then took him out on the WC last week. Backfired a little in hindsight, but still happy with how I'm set up.

          Worst feeling is when you had a player in mind, but backed out because people advised you against it. And he ends up scoring well.

          This way, even if it doesn't work out, at least there's no regrets.

          All the best with the rest of the season buddy!

          1. Ruth_NZ
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Yep, no regrets is the thing. "We only know success or learning".

            Good luck to you too. I'll be rooting for you now.

      4. Timtastic03
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Definitely go for it. 8 points above you, gone more template only because I have my regular WC in the bag. No point coming this close and not going for OR1

          • 11 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Another member of the top 20 club chiming in here. IMO when the FFS captain choice is at a large consensus (2/3rds or more) go with it, the risk is too big otherwise. But if it's spread out a bit, say 4 players at 80%+ ownership and ~20% captaincy and you own all of them, captain your differential midfielder.

          Think about it, if it works out you gain double and as you own all the others your chance there is a lot of mitigation against the captaincy choices of the crowd and you likely lose out much less.

          1. Nico.
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Who would you go for otherwise this week? 😛

    18. Winter_is_coming
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I`m in top 10k, on wc now.
      Will go without Costa, it gives me a strong defence (Terry, Bert, Jones + WBA and Sun cover) and punts like Giroud and Puncheon.

    19. Baines on Toast...
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Dropped from 13K to 23K this week by doing Costa > Aguero, but I might still only accommodate one of them on WC. It feels like the best way to maximise value from elsewhere in the squad, especially when I still don't think I'll captain Costa often.

    20. Sarnab
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I cannot climb up the rankings.. Should I buy some differentials in WC ??

    21. Clump
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      First season for me. Currently the wrong side of 200k. Can't imagine not playing with freedom for fun though. The herd mentality kills the enjoyment.

    22. Carlos Kickaball
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      My advice is to pick the players you think will score the most points, while remaining under your budget. The optimal team is the same whatever your current rank.

      Why people give advice that counters this is beyond me!

      1. GreenWindmill
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        This is essentially my strategy at all times and I spout this quite often on here in one form or another.

        Debate about captaincy differentials/risks - captain who you think will score most.
        Debate about doubling up on a defence or benching one of them - play who you think will score most.
        Debate about playing a goalkeeper against one of your strikers - play you think will score the most

        Etc.

        I realise there are nuances around risk and reward but ultimately I think you should make your decisions 'in a vacuum' and then live or die by them.

    23. The Hindu Monkey
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      my current rank is 16k - but I'm still far more concerned about my cash mini league (current position 3rd) than going further up the rankings

      that said, I actually fit snugly into your group given I don't have costa and have placed my faith in Ings (successful to date) and Di Maria (the complete opposite)

    24. Just A Wooden Spoon
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      The angle I take on this is the prep i do in the first half of the season should mean a healthy team which means I don't really have to look for differentials. The differentials a large team value gives, when the winter wildcard comes along, is that it gives you the chance to add another big hitter that your average Joe can't afford. Therefore my differential tends to be the addition of a Silva or ADM where others have Puncheon whilst maintaining a healthy balanced squad.

      My seasons therefore tend to follow the same pattern, slow and steady leading up to the winter wildcard them explosive post wc as I make good gains on those in front. This season I'm currently around the 15k mark and would expect to be top 10k by the end. Team value is 109m.

      1. Just A Wooden Spoon
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        *Top 1k not 10k.

        1. Ruth_NZ
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Seems a top strategy. The importance of TV was something a had little idea of until the winter wildcard. I'll know better next season. 😉

          1. J0E
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 15 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            It is important but matters less this season as the price rises are curtailed by way FPL measures the system (it changed this season). Its harder to predict but also we are seeing far less of the big 0.3 in a week rises. This time last year I was around 108-9m ...this year I've got 105-6 or so.

            1. Just A Wooden Spoon
              • 14 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              I disagree, I think it gives even more if an edge this year as people struggle to build value whereas I've managed to amass a huge TV that should set me up nicely for the run in.

    25. t4thomas
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Top 1K here.

      I am probably not going to change my strategy at all - pick the players I think will do well based on the next 3 fixtures and transfer my way into and out of trouble with varying degrees of success after that.

      Inevitably most of these players are already part of the template. Therefore, success will have to be based on nailing the captain choice.

      I have an additional WC, so have the benefit of being able to structure my Jan WC for a shorter period of time defensively e.g. till maybe week 30ish.

    26. Ziegler1988
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I broke into the top 100 GW17 and have dropped back a little but still maintaining top 200. One of the reasons I'm so high up was ditching Costa in GW9 even though he was highly owned and a big captain choice. Luckily I got him back a couple weeks ago because I thought he was in form again. I don't plan on playing it safe in terms of getting all the highly owned players (I'm probably losing Kane on my WC and might get Puncheon and Pelle) but will stay cognizant of the popular captain choices since those are what would hurt me the most. It's my first full season of non-casual FPL so would be thrilled to finish top 1k. Closer to the end I'd probably play a blocking strategy to close out money leagues.

      1. FPL Daniel
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        You just need to play your own game and bring the players that you think will bring most pts according your budget. Period. Otherwise is a cowards game and there is no point in it

      2. John t penguin
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        The blocking strategy I found impacted on my overall when I did it.
        I didn't fancy the players I was bringing in but knew it was only way I could get caught if I didnt.
        Figured couple hundred quid was better than 7 or 8 thousand places higher

        1. Ziegler1988
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Yeah it would be the last couple GWs or so if I was protecting a ~10 point lead. At that point, £500 is more important to me than OR.

    27. John t penguin
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Can someone help me
      What is this 10k and 1k thing you refer to?
      Are we all doing fun runs or something?

      1. Fred54
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        They refer to the Overall Rank (OR)

        Top 10K = Top 10,000 players in the Overall rank
        1K = Top 1000 players in the Overall rank,

        Have to agree with the sentiments about picking who you think will score the most points at any given time.
        Also I think template is banded about too often with regards to Gameweek to Gameweek scoring, as this has been a bizzare season where the big hitters seem to explode every few games rather than back to back.

    28. RoysCallerAnne
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      This is the best thread I've read on here in quite a while!

      Most of what I think has been covered above but probably my best tip for climbing the rankings is to hop off early when you think a player will regress. Even one or two GWs without a player who has previously performed really well and has a couple of 2s in a row will greatly benefit you if you choose a canny replacement.

      Another one is to get out quickly when you realize you've made a mistake. Don't hold on stubbornly believing he will come good. An example that jumps to mind is Moreno earlier this season. I got him in after his goal at Spurs but dumped him after 2 GWs when I saw how badly Liverpool were defending!

      1. The Gambler.
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        can go wrong too.

        i've held rooney for 10 GWs, binned him this week on WC, when he is home to Leicester.

        risky!!

    29. Kurt Zouma
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I'm around 18k and have only recently put Sanchez in my team for £11.4m. Should I be risking swapping him for Cazorla and upgrading 4th and 5th mids to try and advance to the top 10k?

    30. tm245
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Intriguing thread, but I feel there is a certain amount of panic in the whole conversation. Just because roster templates are forming and teams look similar doesn't mean that the rankings will be cemented as well once the overall scores get tighter.

      The right captaincy choice, an unlikely CS from a third defender, and a goal from an unsung seventh attacker could give you a massive boost in any given week of 10-15 points over the masses, which is currently worth 2000-3000 spots from my position of 6k.

      Lukaku's second half vs United during the 2013 finale let me soar about 1500 places into the top 5k at the end of gw38 alone.

      It's all still to play for.

    31. SC not pearls before swine
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I'm nestled in the top 1k but eff that. I'm shooting from the hip all the way. Gotta dance with the girl I came to the party with.

    32. Fred54
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Captaincy choice will be a big differential in itself. Haven't got one right since Silva V WBA in the rain.

    33. Pie-o-My
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I think that the over riding factor about whether you make the top 1000 is your cpt choice.

      This season my choices have been absolutely killing me. I've caught all the blanks of Aguero, Sanchez etc etc. I've not made any outrageous choices, I most often have gone with the cpt articles on here. I'm languishing 30k + with umpteen red arrows recently.

      Conversely, my mate is sitting in the top 1k. We have had largely the same players in our teams. I'm about 115 points behind him and his captain choices, most of which I could have made as I had the players have got him just over 115 more than mine.

      It doesn't then take a genius to work out why I'm not in the top 1k or at least a lot higher than I am.

      Interestingly, in a game where there are no cpt choices, the telegraph game, I have two teams in the top 1k. A strong squad and watching the fixtures and form are required there and what essentially is very often pot luck in the choice of a cpt is not an issue.

      So whilst obviously having a strong squad and not taking too many big risks in differentials would be important, I think that cpt choice is the single most important factor as the consequences for getting it wrong are an absolute rank killer.

  7. Man Chest Hair United
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Seeing as things are dead here I could use some advice from you guys. I wild carded last week and already thinking of taking a hit.

    Currently on

    Panty hammer ( haha)

    Terry Bertrand Moreno wisdom wasi

    Hazard Sanchez adm chadli Boyd

    Kun Costa kane.

    Thinking chaddli to Carzola and Terry to berrelin -4,Can then do Moreno to either Clyne or Azpi next week.

    Sorry for the long post.

    Should I take the hit, save or transfer one of Chadli Moreno

    1. LOCO ABREU
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      save

      1. Man Chest Hair United
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Thanks it's the safe choice. Not loving Spurs double though

        1. LOCO ABREU
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          just one more week

  8. Daniel Exeter
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Shameless repost - last comment on previous post

    ***POLL***

    Earlier this morning I created a poll asking the question; are you going for both Costa AND Aguero in the January wildcard or just selecting one of the two.

    35 responses and the results so far are:

    Aguero + Costa: 60% (21 votes)
    Just Agüero: 34% (12 votes)
    Just Costa: 6% (2 vote)
    Neither: 0%

    It gives a nice visual on what people are thinking around that dilemma
    Interesting Aguero seems to be the key man, with 33 of 35 including him in their WC.

    Keep voting and I’ll share the responses later on today.
    Go forth and vote. Here’s the link: http://goo.gl/HQQBv2

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      At least get the numbers right 😀

      1. Daniel Exeter
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Haha I'll do the update later, has it changed? Or is that just you!! 😀

  9. Pilko's Pump Pants
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Afternoon chaps - Tinkering about with WC this week - how's the 1st draft looking?

    Ospina, Pantillimon

    Jones, Muniesa, Hutton, Ivanovic, Wisdom

    Sanchez, Hazard, Boyd, Puncheon, Cazorla

    Aguero, Costa, Kane

    1. LOCO ABREU
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      muniesa maybe only short term, pva instead?

      1. Pilko's Pump Pants
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        I don't want to double up on Sunderlands defence

        1. LOCO ABREU
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          wollyshield instead?

          1. Pilko's Pump Pants
            • 13 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Who?

            1. LOCO ABREU
              • 12 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              new stoke cb 4.5

            2. Pilko's Pump Pants
              • 13 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Wollscheid is 0.1 over budget

  10. Davros
    • 15 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    I'm in the top 1k and am following this strategy above.

    Going for template with a couple of low risk differentials (JWP).
    If I was in top 10k then I'd be risking no Costa and going for Oscar instead, or double chelsea defence.

    At this stage it comes down to your captaincy choice largely.

    1. Davros
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Oops. This looks like a horrible brag But is a reply fail to jonty

  11. LOCO ABREU
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Wc team,what you think?
    Foster-Myhil
    Terry-Clyne-Wisdorm-Pva-Keane
    Hazard-Moses-Sanchez-Cazorla-Boyd
    Costa-Giroud-Aguero

    0.0 itb

    1. Punty
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Sanchez Cazorla and Giroud on a team that "never" scores more than 2 goals?

      1. LOCO ABREU
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        better fixtures now for arsenal. what you change? not sure about defoe,kane,gayle,adm,oscar etc

        1. LOCO ABREU
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          *would you change

      2. Pilko's Pump Pants
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        That's an interesting observation which i'll counter by pointing out that Arsenal scored 3 goals only last week...

    2. 1314
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I'm considering 3 arsenal attacks atm too..everybody owns Sanchez..so it's like Giroud + Cazorla vs Defoe/Kane + ADM/Silva/Sterling..fair to say both combos look similarly strong , Caz being on form and setpieces duty could justify the pick..

  12. Punty
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Dropped from 12k to 26k my first GW after WC.. should I save my transfer still? Or do something about Cameron/Chadli? 0.0m ITB..

    Krul
    Terry PvA Clyne
    ADM Sánchez Chadli Hazard
    Costa Agüero Kane

    Subs: Pantilimon Boyd Wisdom Cameron

    1. LOCO ABREU
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      save, good 11 this week. maybe next week we will have a new bargain in defence or something

      1. Man Chest Hair United
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Nearly blame team as me considering shipping chaddli

  13. Pedram
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Come on Australia

    1. Man Chest Hair United
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Not looking great

  14. Caesar, Hot Mustache
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    it's Fabregas or Costa for me. both seem fairly consistent. Fabregas allows for balance, Costa allows for a soft backline.

    Thoughts?

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      If you don't intend to captain him, just work out the combos.

      1. Caesar, Hot Mustache
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        I'm really torn. looking at both their scores. it's unbelievably consistent. who would you rather go with?

        1. TorresMagic™
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          I have Costa, would rather the better defence.

          1. Caesar, Hot Mustache
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            I've just tinkered & figured I can keep the same backline but can do Fabregas Giroud > Sigurdsson Costa.

            yes or no?

            1. TorresMagic™
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 15 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              I'm probably selling Siggy this week.

    2. 1314
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Costa for (C)

  15. makkintosh
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Hey Guys,

    currently team is:

    Pantilimon
    Hutton / Van Aanholt / Bertrand / Wisdom / Trippier
    Hazard / Di Maria / Sanchez / Cazorla / Silva
    Aguero / Kane / Non-Playing forward

    Wildcard unavailable
    0.0 in the bank
    2 FT

    Any Suggestions? Thanks 🙂

    1. LOCO ABREU
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      would change to 3-4-3, maybe a good time to do it selling silva. silva and non playing forward>budget mid and giroud?

      1. makkintosh
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        thanks, can't get over that week when i captained Giroud as a punt and ended up with -4 though 🙁

    2. A.T
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Maybe Trippier to ballerina if he's playing.

      1. A.T
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Bellerin

        1. makkintosh
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          thanks, you think he is nailed?

          1. A.T
            • 14 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Too early to say but it's looking good

  16. President John F. Keninnsie
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    What's the Australia lineup?

      1. President John F. Keninnsie
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Cheers.

        China's back 4 all rhyme 😀

  17. money face bandwagon
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Picking all the template players without seriously considering whether they are the best available options is like buying a safety net and hoping for the best.

    Nevertheless if they are the best options out there..then it makes little sense to purposely take them out to punt..luckily usually the template picks always have a few that are faltering

  18. Caesar, Hot Mustache
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    OK. coming out of the closet 😆 as regards to Jonty's post. this is my first season, I started GW 3 & I'm ranked 2 mil (team is linked).

    WC draft.
    Pantilimon Krul
    Fonte Terry Wisdom PvA Wollscheid
    Sanchez Hazard Fabregas Puncheon JWP
    Aguero Kane Giroud.

    I've got really better at this game albeit bad choices, indecision, captain fails & a couple late transfers. I can get Costa in but with a relatively soft backline.

    Fabregas Giroud Terry Wisdom > Cazorla Costa P.Jones Baird. advice??

    1. Davros
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Both are good options.
      Personally prefer the second team

      1. Caesar, Hot Mustache
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        thanks. I can keep Terry & Wisdom if I do Fabregas Giroud > Costa Sigurdsson. what say you?

    2. A guy
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I'm one of those who prefer Fabrgeas + Giroud to Santi + Costa, they'll score about the same, but the latter are more expensive. I'd still downgrade Wisdom to Baird and upgrade one of the cheaper midfielders.

      1. Caesar, Hot Mustache
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        I'll downgrade Wisdom to Baird & upgrade Puncheon after his punt stint in my team is over. thanks

  19. LOCO ABREU
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Anyone playing A League Fantasy?

    Izzo(Young)
    Risdon-Georgievski-Gerbash(Bowles-Madashi)
    Koren-Carrusca-Mooy-Finkler-Marinkovic
    Berisha-Keogh(Simon)

    save here?

  20. Fitzy.
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Mods, you might want to edit the blurb at the start of the article -

    "..whilst Swansea edge closer to snapping up Kyle Walker from Spurs."

    1. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Cheers, sorted 🙂

  21. Davros
    • 15 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    I hate it when people lost their RMTs and don't list the players in order of most expensive to least expensive. Makes it very hard to read.

    #first world problem

    1. Davros
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      *list not lost

  22. Holmes
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Costa is too boring for me, still a query 😛
    Is having Aguero and Costa a differential? Wont be possible to determine combined ownership I guess...

    1. ⭐ Bemba_Da ⭐
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      aguero only will be a differential, having costa won't help you climb the ranks it will either keep you where you are or make you drop

      1. Holmes
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        I meant having both. Everyone cant afford that combo without disturbing team balance, right?

        1. ⭐ Bemba_Da ⭐
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          that's what I mean, having both won't essentially see you climb rank drastically. If you go with aguero there is a bigger risk but will also there is bigger chance of rank increase if your differential does well and costa not so well.

          1. Holmes
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Thanks! Better to avoid Costa then 🙂

    2. 1314
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      differs with ranks I think..still quite a differential I assume..

  23. money face bandwagon
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    on my wc...think this is the best team i can come up with so far that I am happy with

    panti gilks

    kompany clyne kosc PVA wisdom

    hazard sanchez carzola elia albrighton

    falcao defoe aguero

    1m itb

    1. money face bandwagon
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      1.4m*

    2. A guy
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I really think Kompany and Falcao are a waste of money. Looking at the fixtures...Why don't you get someone else for Kompany for the Chelsea game and get him in for Hull?

      Also you have the money to get someone else for Gilks (he's a backup GK) and someone like King for Albrighton. Same price, just that King is nailed in the first team.

      1. il Brutto
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        King is not even close to nailed.

        1. A guy
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Still better than Albrighton who's getting constant 0s.

  24. Elniñorules
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    The effect of luck in this game is underestimated to a large extent. Injuries, wrong ref calls, weather, etc.

    Just for instance, who'd have thought Caz is now ahead of Gru in the penalty taking order?

    Enjoy the football while you can 🙂

    1. Sarnab
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Luck has to be there. It is not you who is playing on the field

    2. Elniñorules
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I'm not even sure Cazorla has scored penalties prior to this season and he's had so many in this crazy run 😆

    3. Fitzy.
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Mirallas costing Baines owners 9 points (most likely) is up there...

      1. TorresMagic™
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Not much can be done there.

        1. Fitzy.
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Yeah, just pointing out the bad luck aspect of that situation. And the good luck for those that played WBA defenders, it was a double blow for Baines owners who didn't play any.

        2. FPL Daniel
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Mata and RVP owners including my rival were so lucky when that combo scored goal and assist by miles offside situation

      2. Elniñorules
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Utter trolling.

    4. TorresMagic™
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Hall of Fame disagrees on the luck aspect.
      In certain GWs, luck plays a part.
      Overall not so much.

      1. Sarnab
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Yes consistency is key. Top 10k every season. Not everyone can do it.

      2. Elniñorules
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        My "history" suggests otherwise 😆

        You'll find a few exceptions sure.

        1. Sarnab
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          You are exceptional. Everyone knows 😉

        2. TorresMagic™
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          You obviously know how to play the game well.
          You probably tilt a bit when things aren't going so well.

        3. Elniñorules
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          And I'll happily admit both my top 100 finishes are mostly based on luck.

          1. Sarnab
            • 13 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            I agree top 100 is luck. but top 10k isn't luck.

            1. Elniñorules
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 13 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              That's a fair statement Sarnab.

          2. Fitzy.
            • 13 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            Once 'may' be written off as lucky, doing it twice confirms neither were.

            1. TorresMagic™
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 15 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              🙂

            2. Elniñorules
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 13 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              With me struggling so much this season, I'm starting to doubt that theory man 😆

        4. Qubit
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          too small a sample really, 3 years including one poor finish and 2 very good ones (no offence meant btw! - thats 2 awesome finishes, ive still yet to finish inside the top 1k, but have come close a good few times)

      3. Qubit
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        No it doesnt, across a large enough sample any kind of result can be observed really. Its like coin tosses in that way.

        1. TorresMagic™
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Flicking 7 tails in a row when tails is rare in the first place must involve a fair bit of skill.

          1. Qubit
            • 15 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            eh? a fair coin toss performed correctly is essentially random. no skill involved.

            or perhaps you're just joking?! not sure 🙂

            1. TorresMagic™
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 15 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              It's a 2 head coin with it landing on it's narrow side so no heads.
              Quite rare.

    5. A.T
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      I've said it before and I'll say it again. 😀 luck is massive in this game. There are far too many variables for there not to be. I'd put it at 80% luck but it's how good you are at the 20% skill part that makes the difference.

      1. TorresMagic™
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        I'd say 80% skill, 20% luck.

        1. THAT'S LIFE
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          All you can do is make good, solid, playing picks week in week out - then its down to those players producing and a huge slice of luck.

          It's like poker - there are big swings either way but the more you play the probabilities kick in. If you get enough 60-40 situations in your favour you get a profit - but it can take time and a lot of swings...

          1. A.T
            • 14 Years
            9 years, 9 months ago

            In poker it is universally recognised as a game of 80% luck and 20% skill. The top players always rise to the top eventually but any novice can beat a pro in the short term.

            1. TorresMagic™
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 15 Years
              9 years, 9 months ago

              Agree to disagree.
              Over 38 nights of pokers, there will only be one winner.
              On a night, the novice can win.

              1. Man Chest Hair United
                • 10 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                Replace the word skill with instinct or time. No. Skill involved

              2. A.T
                • 14 Years
                9 years, 9 months ago

                thats what I'm saying. The Hof doesn't show anything to do with luck, it only shows the skill factor. To say the game is 80% luck doesn't take away anything from an individual's skill.

                1. TorresMagic™
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 15 Years
                  9 years, 9 months ago

                  80% luck would mean it's a lottery & making the top 10K each season hard to do. You could have no luck in a season & finish top 10K just with good choices. A dead team would win FPL every season. Skilled players get their team close to this team before others.

      2. Qubit
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Theres one very good piece of evidence that luck part plays a huge part and that is in most years you can see many folk in the top 100 or even top 1000 that have never been anywhere near those rarified heights before (and may well not be ever again).

        To be up there you have to get pretty much every decision right, those that dont fall by the wayside. Out of a huge sample size (3 million players) you will see a small portion playing a close to perfect decision tree, thus keeping them near the top.

        Of course skill plays a part, but the luck part should not be under-estimated. Thats where the fallacy of never taking hits comes from - people look at those at the top and often see they have taken little or no hits and assume thats the 'correct' way to play. In an ideal world yes, but theres no point minimising your hits if your team is woeful and not scoring points. Whats most important is that you have the players scoring points - ideally you achieve this with as little points penalty as possible.

        1. t4thomas
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Agreed, this is the highest rank I have ever achieved - partly I am improving year on year, but luck has been a massive part of it.

          I just got on the right bandwagons this year - last year I missed them all!

  25. Caravagio
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    Hi,

    could do with some WC advice.

    Team as stands

    Heaton/Hamer
    Skrtel/Hutton/Fonte/Baird/Bellerin
    Hazard/Elia/Sanchez/Sanchez(from AVL)/Oscar
    Kane/Aguero/Costa

    0.1ITB on WC

    Im happy with most of it but I bought Oscar in just to try and make some more value back over the 2 week period, possibly same with Elia. see what happens before the GW.

    Any advice?

    Im considering ditching Oscar/Kane but also using the opportunity to get a Chelsea defender in

    So A) stick with Sktrel/Oscar/Kane (welcome to changing Oscar to Cazorla or anyone else)
    B) Sktrel/Oscar > Terry/Downing
    D) find some way of bringing in Giroud for Kane...
    C) any other suggestions welcome!

    1. Man Chest Hair United
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Oscar to Santi

  26. FPL Blow-In
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 9 months ago

    so this is my WC so far but after reading the article above I want to break the template... Suggestions?

    Foster,
    Terry, Koscielny, Pva, Baird, Wasilewski
    Sanchez,Hazard,ADM,Puncheon,Boyd
    Aguero,Costa,Kane

    1. FPL Blow-In
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      Adm -> AJ and Kane -> Giroud?

      Kane -> Bojan/Bera ?

      1. Mak_Gold
          9 years, 9 months ago

          Keep ADM and Kane.

      2. FPL Blow-In
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Wasilewski is Clyne above in my team sorry

    2. callanderlg
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      thoughts pls people :

      Ings + Fabregas

      OR

      Giroud + Oscar

      ??

      1. Camp No No
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        How come you have to ask me that?

      2. Evasivo
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        2nd option, though would prefer Carzorla over Oscar

      3. Man Chest Hair United
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Giroud Oscar

    3. Evasivo
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 9 months ago

      With a defnce looking like this and 0.0 in the bank, any sugestions on swapsies?

      Baird£3.9
      Fonte£5.6
      Bellerín£4.4
      Taylor£4.7
      Wasilewski£4.0

      1. Game of Stones
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 9 months ago

        Bellerin -> PVA
        Taylor -> Wollsheid
        Wasi -> Hutton

        Great rotation.