Community Submissions
27 April 2016 77 comments
​
Share:

When assessing defenders there are five main criteria Fantasy Premier League managers must consider: clean sheet potential, attacking potential, ‘nailed-ness’, price and bonus potential. It is the latter, which accounts for around one in twelve of all points awarded in the game, that this article will focus on.

Williams As The Benchmark

To set the scene let us first consider the case of Ashley Williams, whose 24 bonus points is the highest of any defender. Granted he has two goals to his name, but he clearly offers something extra given the wide discrepancy between his bonus point tally and Swans goalkeeper Lukasz Fabianski, who has earned just four bonus points, with only one of those coming during their nine clean sheets.

BBPS1 Williams vs Fabianksi v2

 

Ahead of double Gameweek 37 the task for FPL managers is to try and find a Williams-esque defender who over their two games has the potential to earn multiple bonus points.

Bonus Thresholds

Another factor to consider is the thresholds for converting a good BPS score into actual bonus points. Here are the key BPS thresholds

60 – every player picked up three bonus points with a BPS score over this figure.

36 – half of all players reaching this threshold gained three bonus points.

32 – 85% of all played reaching this BPS score achieved a bonus, half of which gained two.

28 – half of all players with this BPS picked up at least one bonus point.

20 – no player with a BPS below that figure has earned a bonus point.

Baseline Bonus

BPS scores and bonus point awards are heavily linked to goal scoring and keeping clean sheets. To find out a bit more about why players like Williams do well we have to remove these two key criteria and focus on the baseline Bonus Point System score (BBPS). This leaves a range of other criteria, such as clearances, blocks and interceptions (CBI), crossing and big chance creation.

A key factor in Williams’ success is that he has a great BBPS as he does well at many of these other key criteria, in particular CBI. He currently has the best CBI score of any defender this season.

Playing for 60 minutes is another criteria of BPS allocation so for the purpose of this study I will only look at player statistics where they have played for over an hour. This slightly reduces the pool of data available, especially for players with lots of sub appearances but helps us to better compare apples with apples. Taking away clean sheet and goal points the above BPS threshold scores of 28, 32 and 36 can roughly translate into 10, 14 and 18 BBPS thresholds for achieving bonus.

The Double Gameweek Defences

Chelsea

As a whole there has been a lot of variance across Chelsea’s BBPS scores, but Cesar Azpilicueta just leads the line as a bonus prospect, with his average performance above the first BBPS threshold. His upper limit is also way beyond the third threshold, indicating that he does not require clean sheets to prosper.

BBPS Chelsea

Everton

Keeper Joel Robles and right back Seamus Coleman have both had off-the-chart BBPS scores in the past and Coleman even picked up bonus points in a 1-0 loss against Manchester United recently, however Jagielka has garnered the most consistent BBPS scores in Everton’s defence. The Everton captain, however is currently a doubt for the double Gameweek through injury, which makes Robles and Coleman the standout picks.

BBPS Everton

Liverpool

Mama Sakho was Liverpool’s standout option until his recent suspension by the club and with that still looming over him there is no clear second option, although Martin Skrtel and Kolo Touré have had the highest median performances when they have played. Dejan Lovren looks a poor pick in terms of bonus.

BBPS Liverpool

Manchester United

The missing piece of the puzzle in this defence is Daley Blind. He has been the real BBPS success story, but sadly is classified as a midfielder in FPL. That leaves Chris Smalling and Matteo Darmian to slug it out as the best prospects. Given his nailed-on-ness Smalling looks to the be best option.

BBPS Man U

Norwich City

Norwich are another defence now without their bonus point darling. With Timm Klose now injured, John Ruddy in goal is the new best bet as his saves contribute heavily to his BBPS scores.

BBPS Norwich

Sunderland

Sunderland’s defence all score well in BBPS under Sam Allardyce but Jan Kirchhoff is the most consistent scorer here and can be considered unlucky to have been pipped by Vito Mannone to bonus awards in recent weeks. Patrick van Aanholt and Younes Kaboul have put up big BBPS scores on occasion but it is not the norm for them. At just 4.3 Kirchhoff could prove the best rival to Mannone in Sunderland’s bonus allocation.

BBPS Sunderland

Watford

Watford are another team where their keeper seems to be the key man for bonus points. This is partly due to Heurelho Gomes‘ good save record, but also that the rest of the Hornet’s defence has such a dire BBPS.

BBPS Watford

West Ham

Winston Reid seems to be the best bet in the West Ham defence with a median BBPS score that comfortably beats the rest of his back line. In goal Adrian has a couple of high scoring performances but that has not been his norm. Aaron Cresswell relies heavily on attack related BPS to achieve bonus points.

BBPS West Ham

Conclusion

For Norwich and Watford the best chance of bonus will come from their keepers. Meanwhile, Sunderland is an interesting proposition. Currently their keeper is dominating, but in Kirchhoff they have an enticing under-the-radar option for bonus points. In terms of BBPS for West Ham, Reid looks the best bet, but Cresswell’s attacking potential is hard to ignore and has helped him achieve a respectable 12 bonus points so far this season.

For Chelsea, Azpilicueta dominates BBPS, as he has done in multiple previous studies into bonus allocation. If Jagielka is absent then Coleman and Robles will duke it out for defensive bonus at Everton, while Liverpool have been robbed of their best prospect, Sakho. Given rotation and lack of good bonus point magnets, the Liverpool defence offers little in terms of bonus over the double.

FPL is a simple game made complicated by double gameweek planners.

77 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    9 years, 7 months ago

    thanks for this. I mentioned Kirchhoff on the scoutcast a couple of weeks ago so am pleased to see him do so well in terms of baseline bonus. He looks great value at 4.3. Reid as well looks another to offer strong potential for a kind price tag. Both now firmly on my radar.

  2. Adam West - Team Serbia for…
    • 15 Years
    9 years, 7 months ago

    Thanks Balders

    1. Adam West - Team Serbia for…
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      I have been dwelling on the free kick PVA almost scored all week so this is very helpful it's fresh perspective and all that

        • 12 Years
        9 years, 7 months ago

        I have too, PVA on set pieces raises is a new proposition too and makes the choice very difficult indeed. Goal threat vs bonus potential is a tricky judgement to make that we can only really call which was right in hindsight. Then for those wildcarding there's also Mannone with his save points and bonus potential too.

        1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          9 years, 7 months ago

          I cannot take van Aanholt seriously on set pieces. Sorry, but I just can't.

          Another piece of Allerdici arsery, I fear.

  3. Sylas
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 7 months ago

    What an amazing data-driven article! 🙂

  4. BigManBakar
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 7 months ago

    Thanks, Balders.

    Like many others, I'm looking at a Sunderland defender this week. What makes Kirchoff so favorable in BAPS though? Kone has more than double the CBI's Kirchoff has over the past 4 game weeks.

    1. J0E
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Worth comparison tooling.

      Chance creation and passing look key. Also its not all CBI that Kone gets the better of Kirchhoff in.

      http://members.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/comparison/players/

      1. BigManBakar
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 7 months ago

        Cheers, Jonty.

        Which Sunderland defender would you prefer?

        1. J0E
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 16 Years
          9 years, 7 months ago

          I'm still undecided. Good to know though that Kirchhoff offers something else if I need that extra .4. Its between PVA's attack potential and Kirchhoff's value and BPS.

  5. Defcons are for Kinnear
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 7 months ago

    Thanks Balders. I hope you keep getting more cleverer 🙂
    And why has Mark not signed you up yet I don't know. It's like Benitez and Mitrovic.

  6. Prøphet
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 7 months ago

    Cheers a lot mate! It was between kirch and PvA for me and went with the latter. Will be bringing Cresswell soon!

  7. John t penguin
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 7 months ago

    surely there is nothing left in amazon for you to buy balders

  8. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    9 years, 7 months ago

    Very good, Balders. Thank you! 🙂

  9. Still Unsure
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Nice one Balders. This is quality.

      On a separate note, any update on the Wimbledon Doubles - I think we won our semi-final but I might have missed it! Cheers!

    • TheTinman
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Coleman crocked for weekend?

      1. Danno - Emre Canada
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 7 months ago

        I think he could be, he doesn't mind a hamstring injury or two but I need to know this as well......

    • Danno - Emre Canada
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Love it. Such pretty pictures as well. Top,work. Going slightly off tangent does anyone know of the BPS in relationship to position I.e who has achieved more this season, Def, Mid or Forwards?

        • 12 Years
        9 years, 7 months ago

        Hi Danno, of 2207 Bonus Points awarded so far this season the split has been

        Gks: 145 (6.6%)
        Def: 753 (34.1%)
        Mid: 808 (36.6%)
        Fwd: 501 (22.7%)

        So midfielders and defenders are picking up about a third of the bonus points each with strikers and goalies picking up the rest. It's notable that forwards are picking disproportionately more for the number of strikers on a football pitch as the bonus point system is so skewed towards goal scoring and assisting.

        1. Danno - Emre Canada
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 7 months ago

          Lovely thanks. Defenders is surprising. Like it.

    • Kings of Lyon ★
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Great read! Will look at revising my WC defence based on this.

    • Laporte In A Storm
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Superb article Balders, thank you.

    • SAY SOMETHING SIGNIFICANT
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Excellent as always.

    • Jaws
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Thanks for that résumé. Reality = Kirchhoff 12 games, 0 bonus points.

        • 12 Years
        9 years, 7 months ago

        As I've mentioned in the article he does have strong competition with Mannone and I think that he's been unlucky not to have been awarded any bonus points so far. With Kirchhoff scoring 33 and 34 BPS points in recent matches he has two of the highest unrewarded BPS scores of the season. FPL is about trying to get next week's points rather than chasing last week's and to that end I like Kirchoff as a pick from the Sunderland defence.

      • 12 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Hi guys, I had a bit of trouble with submitting images for this article. New ones are on their way to Jonty now, in the mean time I've uploaded a hi-res album here: http://imgur.com/a/FNgLX

      1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 7 months ago

        Nice one, Balders - thanks.

    • darko
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Wow! Great article!

    • Pompel
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Undoubtedly a great peace of work Balders! But forgive me for apparently being dim, but how to interpret these graphs ?

        • 12 Years
        9 years, 7 months ago

        • Each shape is a smoothed density plot for players' Baseline BPS scores and the higher up the graph a player's plot is, the higher bonus potential they've had.

        • Overlaid on theses density plots are box plots where the coloured rectangles represent the middle 50% of their scores.

        • The white dot in the centre is their average score.

        • The three dashed lines are the thresholds for being more likely to recieve 1, 2 or 3 bonus points than not.

        It's important to not only consider the average score but also the spread of their scores. For instance at Chelsea Ivanovic has a very low average but a wide spread so his average potential has been low but occasionally he has put in a very big performance that could be worthy of bonus points.

        1. Pompel
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 7 months ago

          Thanks Balders - quite clever way to present the data!

        2. John t penguin
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 7 months ago

          ok 'each shape is a' I am fine with, the rest was as confusing as why I can never work out where those dogs go to when the run across the TV screen, I mean they just vanish

    • Zizoulicious
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Very interesting article. A coincidence because I was just popping on to get people's thoughts on PvA and Cresswell 🙂

      A rival already has Kirchoff so I think I will invest the extra 0.4 for PvA who served me well in last year's double. I also think it's going to be difficult for Kirchoff to translate his baseline bps into real baps given it hasn't happened for him so far.

      In terms of this week would you rather Cresswell (wba) or PvA (STO)?

        • 12 Years
        9 years, 7 months ago

        As above I think Kirchhoff has been unlucky not to gain bonus points so far and trying to get next week's points rather than last week's he's a good option IMO. That said the choice isn't clear cut and if you're chasing I definitely think PvA is the way to go just because you need differentials to catch up and he has goal threat to perhaps gain points there. For Cresswell vs PvA this week I'd take the home game vs holidaying Stoke.

        1. Zizoulicious
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 7 months ago

          Thanks Balders!

    • Mancunian
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      2 possible options if Alli gets the ban this week. Which one to go for?

      A) Sakho & Alli > Moreno & Milner

      B) Sakho & Alli > Creswell & Lanzini/Antonio

      Already have Payet but no other Liverpool coverage

    • Bedknobs and Boomsticks
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Great article. Can we have one for all teams over the course if the summer?

        • 12 Years
        9 years, 7 months ago

        Thanks B&B, when the new season comes out i'll definitely look at doing all 20 teams if the BPS rules stay the same. As it is only dgw teams that are really in our thinking with 3 weeks left.

    • JK - Cønt ⭐
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Great work Balders

      Pretty much nails on Kirchoff and Cresswell for me

      Kirchoff for BAPs as Sunderland could pick up CS

      Most of West Ham's CS came whilst their attackers were injured and Billic parked the bus

    • Theatre_Of_Screams
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Can't be bothered to take hits so should l get a Hammers or Sunderland defender in? The cost doesn't matter.

    • Cheeseoid
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Great work Balders. Somehow when I am looking at your baseline BPS scores they mostly look like naked ladies to me.

      I wonder what that says about me?

      Is it supposed to be a Rorschach test?

    • Ziro Becomes One
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      How did those charts make it through the filter here? They are positively NSFW-looking from where I am looking. Balders must secretly be a mod.

      1. El Muñeco
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 7 months ago

        Haha, I was thinking the same thing when reading the article.

        Creativity at its finest

    • Chenku╰☆╮
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Why are these stats being shared for all to see and not reserved for members??

      1. Ziro Becomes One
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 7 months ago

        Probably because bbps scores are not from the members' section here, but from the FPL website which anyone can calculate and has access to. Not sure on the finer details but that must be one of the reasons.

        • 12 Years
        9 years, 7 months ago

        These aren't members' stats. All I have used are BPS scores taken directly from the FPL site.

    • 32chickens
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Balders
      -the female form is a wonderful and marvellous thing.......

      1. Old Man
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 7 months ago

        Never has a truer word been spoken.

      2. how now brown cow
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 7 months ago

        I think lovren is my favourite shape.

        1. 32chickens
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 7 months ago

          i dunno-I'd always had my worries that van aanholt could be not be tight at the back but the graphics suggest otherwise.....

          • 12 Years
          9 years, 7 months ago

          You lot crack me up, they're just mean to be visually intuitive graphs 😀

          If I rotate them sideways next time, will it stop your wandering minds? OTOH if it holds your interest while reading my articles....

          1. Pasqualinho
            • 16 Years
            9 years, 7 months ago

            Your brilliant idea of how to get your point across has gone all pear-shaped.

          2. 32chickens
            • 15 Years
            9 years, 7 months ago

            we're saying nuffin balders....
            very intuitive
            but no would take a lot more for me to bash a bish!

      3. Forza
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 7 months ago

        😆 I thought I was alone in seeing it this way!

    • Holy See
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Cheers Balders, phenomenal as ever.

    • Ziro Becomes One
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      This article and a check on the member's area for stats has almost convinced me to get Kirchoff, except for one thing. My rival doesn't have Sunderland defence and he being slightly a 'casual' manager, if he gets one it will be PvA. My lead in the ML (16 points) isn't great enough for me to rely on the superior bappage of Kirchoff as I would not be able to take the shock of a PvA goal/assist if my rival decides to get PvA after seeing that I have Kirchoff. Would be a classic case of #yearofcasuals so am going with PvA.

      But for those who aren't closely leading or are in fact chasing, you all should get Kirchoff. Fully with Balders' analyses there.

        • 12 Years
        9 years, 7 months ago

        As above to Adam West, bonus potential is only one part of the equation and with PVA now potentially on set pieces it is an even tougher call. Goal threat vs bonus potential is a tricky judgement to make that we can only really review in hindsight. FWIW I'm less in favour of Kirchoff than I was when I started writing the article as there is so much variance and as Mannone is there as competition too. I initially only mentioned Ruddy, Gomes and Reid in my conclusions as I did not want to oversell Kirchoff.

    • Old Man
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 7 months ago

      Balders - top marks! You have a very innovative way of presenting data.