Scout Notes
23 March 2017 971 comments
davidwardale davidwardale
Share:

England lose and Scotland draw, but it is the defeat that contains the positives as the season’s final batch of international matches gets underway.

Germany 1 England 0

What’s the difference between England and Germany? On the evidence of last night’s friendly in Dortmund, it was a 25-yard screamer from the retiring Lukas Podolski and not a lot else.

The veteran striker earned his 130th, and final, international cap and won the match with a superb goal out of nothing.

For England, employing a 3-4-3 formation to promising effect, it was scant reward for a performance of some merit – or punishment for failing to take their chances when on top in the first half.

From a Fantasy perspective, the 27.6%-owned Dele Alli brought his fine Spurs form to Germany, minus the goalscoring edge that has seen him find the net in his last three league matches.

The midfielder squandered the visitors’ best chance when put in on goal by Jamie Vardy, taking an age to consider his options and then blasting straight at German keeper Marc-Andre ter Stergen.

Adam Lallana also caught the eye. But without Alli’s end product – the Liverpool man has no goals and just one assist since Gameweek 19 – it was perhaps less surprising when his fine run from the halfway line ended with a shot coming back off the inside of the post.

Gareth Southgate marked his first match in permanent charge of England by handing a debut to Burnley’s Michael Keane as one of three centre-backs. Southampton duo Nathan Redmond and James Ward-Prowse also took their senior bows as second-half substitutes, while Jesse Lingard also calmed concerns of a knock sustained in Sunday’s win at Middlesbrough by making an appearance from the bench.

Elsewhere, Fantasy Premier League’s most popular defender, Tottenham right-back Kyle Walker (35.3%), was a key performer at wing-back for the full 90 minutes – allaying any fears surrounding his hand injury sustained in Sunday’s victory over Southampton.

The one worry for his ownership base is that he will almost certainly repeat the feat in Sunday’s World Cup qualifier at home to Lithuania, leaving him less than fresh when Spurs return to league action at Burnley on April 1.

There should be no such issues over two of Manchester City’s three most-owned assets, John Stones (16.2%) and Raheem Sterling (13.1%). The former was given five minutes of pitch time at the end of the match, while the latter was an unused substitute.

Meanwhile, City’s German winger Leroy Sane, owned by 3.3% of FPL managers, played the entire match for the Germans and forced a fine save from Joe Hart.

England XI: Hart, Keane, Smalling (Stones 85), Cahill, Walker, Dier, Livermore (Ward-Prowse 83), Bertrand (Shaw 83), Lallana (Redmond 66), Alli (Lingard 71), Vardy (Rashford 70).
Subs not used: Heaton, Forster, Clyne, Shaw, Barkley, Ward-Prowse, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Defoe, Sterling.

Scotland 1 Canada 1

The parlous state of Scottish football at the moment was writ large in the friendly at Dundee.

Canada started the match with nearly as many Premier League performers as Scotland, and the hosts then spent much of the first half trailing to their opponents, who are ranked 117th in the world.

Burnley midfielder Scott Arfield was the Canadian’s EPL representative, while Scotland boos Gordon Strachan started with West Ham’s Robert Snodgrass and West Brom’s Darren Fletcher.

Hull defender Andy Robertson boosted the Scots’ Premier League contingent when he came on for the second half of a low-key encounter, Fantasy-wise, in which Snodgrass hit the post.

Arfield later limped off with an injury, which is unlikely to create any major Fantasy repercussions other than improving Robbie Brady’s opportunity for starts should he be sidelined. Arfield has been deployed on the left flank in recent matches for the Clarets, consigning Brady to the bench.

Elsewhere, the 9.5%-owned Snodgrass and Fletcher (9.7%) are expected to start Scotland’s second match of the international break, Sunday’s World Cup qualifier against Slovenia.

Scotland XI: McGregor, Anya, Berra, Mulgrew, Wallace (Robertson 45), Burke (Bannan 45), D Fletcher, Cairney, Naismith (Rhodes 62), Snodgrass, C Martin (Griffiths 62).
Subs not used: Gordon, Robertson, S Fletcher, R Martin, McGinn, Griffiths, Bannan, Rhodes, Cooper.

971 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. The Polymath
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Any one else in a Mini-League which have a small trophy to award to the winner each year?

    1. FPL_Hazards
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      yes, been running since the first FPL season. Cash is the main thing tho 🙂

    2. skooldaze
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I wanted to do this but because of location of players, we'd knew it'd get lost, broken, not handed over etc

    3. Funkyav
      • 17 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      yep got a trophy last year for first time, passed on each season now

    4. Gregor
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I've won many a mini-league and never got a trophy.

      I would love a trophy.

    5. Samurai Blue
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Yes, although cash is the main prize. But yes, top 3 get a medal and top manager a small trophy.

  2. Time to reclassify wingbacks?
    J0E
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Fantasy Football Scout daily hot topic

    Time to reclassify wing backs?

    With even England now adopting a 3-5-2 (or variety of) line up, is next season time for FPL to fall in line with other Fantasy games and consider listing wing backs as midfielders.

    Currently Moses and Alonso perform the same role for Chelsea, yet one is a defender and the other isn't.

    Feel free to add views on whether midfielders who play as strikers - such as Firmino and Sanchez should be listed as forwards from next season too.

    1. J0E
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      FanDuel for example list Alonso and Moses as midfielders.

      Sky and FanDuel list Sanchez and Firmino as forwards.

      1. buffrey
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Firmino is a Mid in Sky, which again is a bit contrary, compared to Sanchez as you'd say they are similar.

        I think it depends on where they were perceived to be at the start of the season. Alonso was thought to be as a left back in a back 4, whilst moses was probably thought of as a squad player right winger who'd get about 5 games this season.

        Next season its decision time really, however I think they should probably keep them as they are as if they revert they WILL become defenders as opposed to midfielders. (moses should become a defender as well as Milner)

        The sanchez one is trickier as he's been playing a majority fully up top (like Firmino).

        its annoying he's a striker in Sky as I'd really like to free up that slot for another big hitter.

      2. the Penman
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Makes sense for FanDuel - they are midfielders, but who do lots of defending and get rewarded in FD with points for a variety of actions, not just what they do in the opposition's box.

        For FPL, they only get rewarded for clean sheets and goal-related actions. So keep them as defenders (since they do defend and that's the only way to reward them for it).

      3. Jøssy ⭐
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Moses has always been a midfielder though.

        It's definitely a risky precedent, as it may significantly reduce our defensive options, and crowd the midfield options.

        In fact, it would probably kill the guys you're talking about as FPL options, because Walker and Alonso don't get anywhere near enough attacking returns to warrant a space in our midfield 4 (or 5), and they'll have lost 3 points per CS too.

    2. Funkyav
      • 17 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      if they do this then I think they also need to look at defensive midfielders differently and that would change the game too much i fear

      1. Cheese Crunch
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        this

      2. Sonny “The Hitman&rdq…
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        This... Kante deserved a 6er for scoring last week given most of the game he is back protecting the back line

    3. FC Lackless [BALEGIUM]
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I can't imagine many managers welcoming this prospect

    4. Gregor
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Screw that, one of the joys of Fantasy Football is exploiting the emergence of an out of position player before the masses catch on. The game's fine.

    5. Funkyav
      • 17 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      for all we know 4 at the back could be back to being the norm next season

      Im amazed that everyone has copied Conte this season (although I guess not when you see how successful it has been)

    6. willgriggsonfire
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Only out and out strikers are considered right now, right?
      Sanchez doesn't always play in that role, like when Giroud is playing or Welbeck.
      As for wing backs. Classifying them as premium defenders rather than MFs looks good. They do add a different dimension to the game.

    7. UnitedFan
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Maybe if the player is originally a defender (RB/LB), then they should be classified as a defender. If they are a mid being used as a wingback, then they should be classified as midfielders? Alonso being a defender and Moses a midfielder is correct then? The likes of Rose or Walker shouldn't be classified as midfielders, they're still defenders. and will occassionally be fullbacks in a switch back to a back 4

      1. J0E
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Moses either doesn't play or is a wing back. Alonso has not been used as a full back at all this season. Can't see both having different classifications next season - I guess they may put Moses as a def. But when many other games list the likes of Sanchez as a fwd and Alonso as a mid I wonder how long FPL will hold out.

        1. suddenorgan
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          surely Alonso is going to be classified as a midfielder? I'm trying to remember what happened with Elmohamady a few seasons ago when he emerged OOP for Sunderland and was then reclassified, were they playing 3-4-3 at that point?

          1. nyron
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 3 months ago

            Sunderland played 451 with Elmo as an out and out winger. Can't remember what he was classified as in FPL but he'd played wing back in Egypt so likely defender

        2. UnitedFan
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          My point is Alonso is originally a defender and just being used as a WB. He should then remain so as a result. In terms of Moses, that's where it gets tricky. In my opinion, the other games are wrong when putting Sanchez as a forward, he's an attacking mid that can play there and has played there, but not enough to be in the same category as the likes of say, Costa. Alonso being a mid is wrong too imo, just because he plays an advanced role doesn't mean he should be put as a mid. I hope FPL don't change anything.

        3. FC Lackless [BALEGIUM]
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Just hope this isn't gonna be the next step in the continual dumbing down of the game to make it easier and more accessible for the less clued in masses

          Not a welcome development for those better able to exploit the anomalies

          1. FC Lackless [BALEGIUM]
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 3 months ago

            It's all about money ... put me off my breakfast now.

        4. tisza
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          looked at the Moses/Alonso stats sometime in Jan.
          Ignoring bonus pts Moses as a defender was outscoring Alonso.
          Alonso as a mid wasn't even in top 15/20 mids.

      2. willgriggsonfire
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Yes, he rarely played before the formation change. But I can see Alonso playing in back 4 system.

    8. Forza
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      4 or 5 defender formations would become even less viable than they already are. With less good defenders available, almost every team on FFS would be 3-4-3 and 3-5-2. We need great defenders to challenge the consensus of playing 7 midfielders/forwards.

      1. The Mighty One
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 17 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        This is the key! Well spoken, Forza!!

        I often try to play 5 at the back and it never sticks. We just cannot do it with their prices relatively high and the talent moving up front. Cheers.

    9. Eden Hazardous
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      For me , all wing backs should continue to be in the defenders category but the prices can be higher.

      1. J0E
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        This I like. Just think there needs to be consistency.

        It seems laughable now that Walker was just 5.5 at the start of the season. Kicking myself for not getting him in GWK 1 and keeping him.

        1. Eden Hazardous
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Yup , I am expecting Walker/Rose/Alonso/Moses to be 6.5m+ next season

          1. OldBenKenobi
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 3 months ago

            what about the likes of coleman and baines who shift between full backs and wingbacks? 6m?

            1. Eden Hazardous
              • 11 Years
              9 years, 3 months ago

              Yup.
              Wingback or not , these 2 are very attacking

        2. bojack
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Walker was OK at the Euros and great last year and before the price list was released i knew he'd be in my team. When i saw he was 5.5 i thought that I'd daft.

    10. The Rumour Mill
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I think Alonso, Moses, Rose and Walker have to be mids next season. Which would kill them as assets next season. The interesting thing will be what they do with Valencia, Coleman etc. Not as obvious wing backs but have played as them on occasion. There's definatwly a stronger case for them to remain as defenders though, which would heighten their appeal next season, particularly if Everton and man u switch to wing backs full time.

      1. willgriggsonfire
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Walker has played as full back also when a back 4 formation was used. Although, he does tend to get higher up the pitch than most def.

      2. UnitedFan
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Walker, Rose and Alonso are still defenders despite playing in advanced positions. Wrong for them to be reclassified imo. They can all play in a back 4 if their respective teams change formation again

    11. Kindness
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I don't think it's a good idea - just raise the price of these defenders. Reclassifying Alonso, Walker, etc. leaves a very small pool of premium defenders to choose from

    12. Samurai Blue
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      No, Walker, Rose, Alonso are full-backs, so they should be classified as defenders. If they should cost more, that is another thing. Sanchez does not always play as a striker, so he should stay as a midfielder. The majority of games Firmino always leads the line, so he should be classified as a forward.

      1. Deulofail
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        You mix "forward" and "striker" to suit your needs. Both are forwards. Neither are strikers.

    13. Rhinos
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Milner is the interesting one. Surely he'll be a defender but klopp may well buy someone anyway

    14. President Giggs
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Would much rather see them as higher priced defenders rather than extra midfielders; give us a reason to play formations other than 3-4-3 and 3-5-2. The goal of the fpl team should be to make as many players viable as possible. Wing backs who get 7-8 attacking returns per season are not going to get picked up by anyone as midfielders unless they're priced at 4.5-5m at which point we might have one as bench fodder. The fact that many teams switch between 3-5-2 and 4-4-2 with the wing backs reverting to full backs amplifies this point further.

      1. Rhinos
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        This. Plus as dangerous as Alonso has looked his returns as a midfielder for a top team would not make him good value

    15. MTPockets
      9 years, 3 months ago

      No, I guess FPL optimises for squad workability which is good. If this is an issue, simply adjust relative pricing.

    16. ViperStripes
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      No because it would reduce flexibility of your squad. IF they stick with 15 players but say 4 defenders, 4 mids and 2 wingbacks as your slots it massively reduces flexibility. Part of the skill is finding those OOP players e.g. Alonso before other players jump on the bandwagon.

    17. Funkyav
      • 17 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      the other vital thing FPL and the game's organisers need to remember is...

      If it aint broke then dont fix it

      Meddling with the game too much is a sure fire way to alienate the hardcore fans

      1. A.T
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Good luck with that one. They can't help having a tinker 😉

      2. buffrey
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Yo'll still play it though, because you're hardcore. Its the new revenue generating, non hardcore fans they are probably trying to attract.

        1. Dr Dream
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Alaways. We aren't the target audience whether we like it or not. Work/family/friends/groups ML's are....and quite rightly.

    18. A.T
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Wingbacks are defenders and should stay the same. Alonso should be a midfielder though because he's played there all season.

    19. OldBenKenobi
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      What does the likes of FIFA, PES and Football Manager class them as? I'd go with that 😉 In all seriousness wing backs for me fall under DEF not MIDs. Regards to likes of Sanchez and Firmino is more complicated as they can play diff positions for cluba and country. I think best way to handle this is to adjust the prices for these OOP players so it reflects their value more i.e. more expensive. Just my 2 cents 🙂

    20. buffrey
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I think as standard there should be at least 4 players in a team getting Cleans sheet bonuses. This then gives better balance for BPS and team structures, etc.

      As mentioned above if this turned to only 3 Per team (I realise not all teams adopt it but still) then it will template the defence a bit and restrict formation options.

      Wingback should be defenders, just riced accordingly if they are immense. I'm sure worse teams play 3-5-2 but their assets aren't as high scoring o we're not complaining about them. if priced right they should stay as defenders. looking 6m+ for most wingback from decent sides I'd suggest.

    21. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Great. Another advantage scratched off.

      1. ILOVEBAPS
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Have an up vote.

    22. _Make
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Nearly all full-backs are attacking these days. Just have a separate full-back bracket at the most and accept that some are more attacking than the others. Like midfielders.

      1. _Make
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Pick five defenders, a minimum of two need to be CBs. Sorted 🙂

    23. Dr Dream
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I hope not because recognising OOP prospects is a key weapon for those who study the game.

      Having said that it would also mean we would be in the know when teams ditch 3-5-2 and revert to four at the back (usually do when results turn against them)...at which point we would sell whilst other might hold.

      1. Numb
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Yes but therein lies the problem. Fpl are always looking for ways to level the playing field. I suspect that is what is behind this bit of market research

    24. skooldaze
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I think FF will keep it very basic on a 4-4-2 to avoid everyone loading up on a player.

      From my 15 odd year experience of playing the game, you will generally get a player marked as a defender and if they play a certain amount of games as a different position, then they will be reclassified.

      1. The Mighty One
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 17 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Oh the days of having Bale as a defender!

    25. Too Mane Men
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      What are Gabi owners doing?

      Why did he have to get injured... Why!?

      1. Too Mane Men
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Oops. Sorry Jonty. Just failing to express my sadness within the correct post.

    26. Netley Lucas
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      With attacking full-backs like Clyne & Bertrand getting into equally good positions as the better wing-backs it's probably unwise to reclassify the latter. Next season's pricing can hopefully reflect each individual's productivity, so that should be enough.

      1. Individual
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Maaan Netley, so annoying 🙂 I was writing the same thing but you've hit the nail on the head in a more concise, eloquent fashion.

        Damn you! But 100% this.

        Plus I like the name drop there 😉

        1. Netley Lucas
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          lol, I should have added Coleman of course, good post.

    27. Individual
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Think it's been something we've been aware of - favouring defenders who can get assists/goals has been on our radar - but wing backs like Alonso and Rose particularly playing a huge portion of the game in the opponent's half being clearly different to the likes of Toby/Big Wes last year has been a real trend.

      I can definitely see some attempts at that incorporated, and we have seen players moving positions - see Brunty as a defender this year - but I think it becomes really subjective and difficult to decide who fits in to what bracket, so I can see why they haven't done anything yet. For instance, I think if you then tried to implement it, you'd have lots of questions. Would you only make midfielders out of defenders playing for teams in 3-5-2? What about Coleman/Baines, who are in 4-4-2? Same example: Coleman bombs forward but Baines doesn't tend to go as far up the pitch - would you reclassify Coleman but not Baines? How would you decide? You could even use the example of Nyom for WBA - rampages forward, but also fills the RB slot defensively.

      So yeah, definitely some issues at hand to be worked out and clearly explained if they were to make that step.

      For now, I'm happy with occasional 21 pointers dropping into my gameweeks, and more fool the people who don't own these amazing FPL players.

    28. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Defenders, but priced accordingly. If they were midfielders we probably wouldn't touch many of them with a barge pole.

      1. Pasqualinho
        • 17 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        I agree with this. Alonso is a prime example of someone who would be poor value at his current price if he was a midfielder.

    29. Il Papera
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I think reclassification would hinder the fun. With 5 midfielders, picking from defensive midfielders would be incredibly boring, while shoehorning the quality attacking midfielders turned forwards and original forwards into three spots would be painful.

      If a forward is slightly midfieldery, i.e. Sanchez/Firmino, keep him as a midfielder. As for wing backs, a wing back is a defender in my unwritten and won't ever be written book. Again, more fun. Moses is the new Valencia, so therefore a defender, and also the antithesis of Bale (interesting one to place is Gareth!).

    30. Somalion
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I think wingbacks vs mids playing as forwards are different debates.

      I reckon, keep wingbacks listed as defenders but up their prices.

      As for the likes of Firm and Sanchez, I think it should come down to what position they play most over a season. Firm undoubtedly needs to be reclassified. Sanchez is a bit more of a mixed bag, fair argument he should be reclassified but he has played on the wing a good deal (not had a chance to look up where he's played most, bit swamped). That argument is slightly moot anyway, seeing as he'll most likely be playing elsewhere next season.

    31. Deulofail
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I thought about this. Perhaps there should be no positions at all. Just price differences.

      Perhaps the most defensive players should have a big D next to them and get full CS points, and wingbacks and very defensive mid players have a lil D that signifies they get half points for CS.

      1. Deulofail
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Likewise, Firmino and Sanchez are obviously forwards, but not strikers. Either classify them as forwards and allow more than 3 per team, or as I say above, don't classify anyone and allow as many as you want per team, letting the prices themselves limit the manager's choice of how many attacking vs defensive players they select.

        I thought before about classifying GK, def and attack only, but it just leads down the path to no classification at all. Maybe it's madness. It's certainly a big change, and perhaps a big risk for FPL.

    32. grapesland
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      It doesnt really matter, as long as the players points potential is reflected in the price, imo

    33. Sadio
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      We say this every year and FPL continues to keep it the way it is.

      If they change the classification of wingbacks and players like Firmino and King the game won't appeal as much, hence they will likely keep it again.

    34. Amateur Pundit Zan
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Would just ruin them as options and take them out the game. Like Moses who is a crap option

    35. the Penman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Nah, just jack up their prices as defenders.

      As for OOP mids up front: if they play more than half the league games specifically in a forward position, change them for next season. If they appear a few times in the absence or injury of a proper striker, don't. Easy. It might rule them out of being a good pick next season, but then you shift them back if they do. The 1-season lag in classification is where FPL managers make their mark - if you're paying attention you will profit; if you're not you'll fall behind or waste your teams slots. And that's ok.

    36. Rossonero
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Definitly no for me.

      You gave an example of Alonso and Moses and i think it is a perfect example why it would be bad if they were both defenders. Imagine a situation where 2 Chelsea defenders and 2 mid get injured, in that situation Alonso goes to play in back 3 or back 4, and Moses will fill up in the advanced mid role. Now, imagine having Moses classified as defender playing in a Willian or Pedro role while Azpi covers in RWB.

      Situations like this should be solved with price, putting a high price on a defender who will play as a wingback, and putting a low price on a mid who will play as a wingback.

    37. Numb
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      This sounds like research on behalf of Fpl.

      Think its fine as it is tbh

    38. Je suis le chat
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I think we should be able to pick a squad of 15 goalies if we fancy.

    39. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I could see positives in promoting holding mids: perhaps 2 for a clean sheet and higher BAPS for CBI.
      BUT you could sub-categorise players all day and, it would destroy the fun IMO!
      4-3-3: Front line as strikers? Mane striker, Lallana mid - Nope...
      4 man defence diamond: Cedric and Bertrand are the highest pushing FBs due to being the only players providing width.

      I say Moses and Alonso both expensive defenders. Fundamentally should be (generally) weighted 5.5 CB - 6.5 FB/WB...

    40. Elijah's Wood
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Rose/Walker situation is tricky because Poch could switch to a back 4 at any time next season meaning we have a very limited selection of Spurs defenders next season if FPL do change their classification to mids. The same situation happened at Liverpool a couple seasons ago where Rogers was using Can and other reverse OOP mids as defenders. Can you imagine only being able to choose Toby or Vertonghen as Spurs defence? They need to reclassify Dier as well back to a defender, was a silly change making him a mid.

      Honestly if FPL knew what is best then they'll just keep the wingbacks as defenders but ramp up the price tag to £7m like they did with Chelsea defenders and Baines/Coleman in past seasons.

      Sanchez is tricky though as he drops into the wing whenever a striker is available so ideally would like him to stay as a mid.

      Firmino needs to be a striker though, it's too easy to select a 5 man midfield than it is for 3 strikers and having to choose between having Firmino or Sanchez to occupy that vital 1/3 striker position in our teams I would rather just ignore Firmino.

      Alonso will be a midfielder next season, though as someone else put it, half the fun of FPL is exploiting the OOP players.

    41. Oddjobleff
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Maybe the points for a game should be awarded based on their starting position. Classification can remain the same but if someone starts OOP they accrue points for that game based on that position rather than where FPL think they play.

      1. teachmunna
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        I dont like that. What about games where a player plays in multiple postions, ala Antonia for West Ham.

    42. Baines on Toast...
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      defenders should only be reclassified if they undergo a Bale-like push forward. Just make them more expensive defenders - it makes the game far more interesting than having a bloated midfield.

    43. Ryssel
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I'm with most... Keep wing backs as defenders but priced accordingly.

      Most of this season I've been playing 4-3-3 with Alonso/Baines/Coleman/Mcauley at one point even going 5-2-3 with more expensive wing backs.... Sometimes it works, other weeks less so... But it opens up options when you need to play a but differently.

      If WB's become midfielders our pool. Of players to chose from will shrink and template teams would stick much faster and longer.

      About Sanchez/Hazard/Antonio... If they get reclassified, will they become cheaper? Will have to, right?

    44. teachmunna
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I think it might be worth considering a new hybrid position in team selection....
      I.E. Perhaps maybe removing 1 traditional midfield position position and 1 traditiional defender position and replacing it with 2 wing back positions.
      THat would look like the following in terms of overal team format:
      Goaly1 Goaly2
      Defender1 Defender2 Defender3 Defender4
      WingBack1 MidF1 MidF2 MidF3 MidF4 WingBack2
      For1 For2 For3

      The scoring system would have to be adjusted for the new role.

      Anyway, I'll jump off my swaying pedestal, before I fall off, as I contemplate options around the Sanchez Mid/Forward hybrid role which then presents itself.

    45. rozzo
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      No. Wingbacks are defenders, always have been.

      Alonso, Walker, Rose etc are defenders. Moses has spent his entire career as a midfielder, not a wingback, prior to this season hence his status as a midfielder.

      A wingback in a 352 is still a defender.

      You can't punish a player because he has good stamina and can bomb forward all match as well as get back into defensive position as quick as possible.

      You also can't punish a player because of what positions he takes up in a match due to tactics.

      If they reclassify Alonso or Walker as midfielders they may as well reclassify Kante and Wanyama as defenders because guess who covers the space when the former bomb forward?

    46. The Polymath
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I don't see the problem. Market forces dictate defenders who do a lot of attacking automatically start to become more expensive during the season.

    47. Athletic Bilbo
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I agree with most here that we have the easiest and most fun arrangement now. Prices just need to reflect attacking returns. Taking WB's into midfield would reduce the defender player pool too much (Spurs a good example above), and midfield would be swamped with poor picks. It's not like wingbacks are dominating the game (Cahill currently top defender).

      I'm concerned with the defensive midfielder position, a huge part of the player pool that is unselectable (including Kante, who many consider the best player in the league). Splitting mids into DM and AM with 2pt cs bonus for DM and none for AM would level that playing field a little - along with different bonus weightings. Kante has only picked up one bonus point, Wanyama has 3 from the game he scored the winner. And they've had immense seasons.

      You should still be free to choose as many of each as you like to fill the five slots but it would expand the player pool and reduce templates. I don't think it would overly complicate matters and would benefit casual and hardcore players alike.

      Surely a larger selection of viable midfielders would be more of an improvement than shrinking the defensive pool?

      1. Athletic Bilbo
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        And before anyone asks how fpl could differentiate AM from DM there are several options - season average position on heat map being the obvious one

      2. tm245
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        This is a great point -- I just loooked at the FPL player listings and there are 176 defenders and 238 midfielders, but of those defenders I think owners will have likely considered the full range of price points (or at least down to the 100 or so priced at 4.5m or more for those who don't like ubers) whereas there are also 100 or so midfielders priced at 5.0m or higher, creating a much bigger waste land of unpickable mids.

        Your idea wold boost the points of the DMs and make them more viable, though I think expanding the BPS to give them more credit would also help. You really want a Kante type player's best attributes to be rewarded, like successful tackles, so they could get to 5, 6, 7 points per game for a standout performance.

    48. Jamiemck
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Absolutely not!! One of the challenges in fpl is doing your lineup research and finding an advantage that others may over look.

      Also if you where to have different classifications for every single positional possibinility it would lead to a clutter and nonsensical game, never mind the countless rules disputes that would arise!!

      Absolutely nonsense!

    49. Geoff
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      If everyone is well priced, it doesn't matter. I think classifying them as midfielders makes picking defence even more boring. There would be so few players to pick from.

      Having expensive and cheap defenders with different roles is good for the game.

    50. LoyalRoyal
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I think it is fairly simple, wing backs are defenders. Midfielders/Wingers who sometimes lead the attack are not strikers .

      If you play 25+ (or something like that) games in a position that is what you should be classified as next season.

      Milner - Defender
      Moses - Defender
      Firmino - Striker

    51. XabiAlonso
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      No need to complicate the game, just an adjusted price for these players as always happens anyway is enough. The same way baines and ivanoivic used to be very expensive defenders as they scored more attacking points next season so should the likes of alonso Coleman and walker

    52. tm245
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      A bit disconnected, but this HT got me wondering. In fantasy MLB there are almost always 1-2 slots called "Utility" for hitters in which you can take someone from any position in the field and put them in that slot. Maybe FPL could create a similar designation, perhaps with a purchase price cap for the position, in which any player could go there -- a cheap forward, uber defender, etc. The scoring would be based on whichever position you bought the player.

      Not sure how the wing backs could slot in there, though.

    53. Pep says
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Why does it matter? These players are available to anyone to avail of if they so please.

      McAuley has probably spent more time in the opponents box this season than Kante. It's the respective teams tactics and we as fpl managers are adopting these tactics of attacking defenders into our teams.

      Changing their positions in the fantasy game diminishes their appeal. If Rose and Walker become mids, then we only have 3 options into Spurs defence as opposed 5. Same across all teams that employ these formations. Means we have less choice to diversify as managers.

      If it ain't broke, don't fix it. I just don't see why they should have their positions changed. It isn't creating an unfair advantage in any way, shape or form

    54. Old Wulfrunian
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      For me FPL must listing the players according 2 facts.
      1)Players who played last year in PL,
      2)Players who are going to participate for the first time in the PL,or players who had played in PL and should play again.
      The listing for players of 1 should be decided by the position and the role they had last year(for example Alonso as a midfielder in 17/18,DLuiz as a defender in 17/18).The listing for players of 2 should be decided by the position and the role they had last year in their previous team.

    55. 1966 was a great year for E…
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Just get the pricing right. Terry, Vidic and Baines have all been 7.5m in the past - Alonso should be at least 7.0 next season.

      1. 1966 was a great year for E…
        • 15 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        I'd make him 7.5, personally. Prices have got way too easy.

        1. 1966 was a great year for E…
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          In fact, I think Terry and Vidic were 8.0 once.

          1. Gnu
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 16 Years
            9 years, 3 months ago

            Check transfer history 1966. both Baines & Terry finished the season on 8.1m.
            Can't check Vidic.

            1. 1966 was a great year for E…
              • 15 Years
              9 years, 3 months ago

              There you go, then 🙂

    56. SweepaKeepa
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I'd like the fantasy 11 to better match a real 11.
      Squad of:
      2 x GK
      3 x CB
      3 x FB
      2 x DM
      3 x AM
      2 x ST
      Starting 11 must field 1 x GK, 2 x FB, min 2 x CB, min 1 x DM, min 1 x AM, min 1 x ST.

      Wing backs, as described above, would be in the FB category.

      DMs scoring similar to CBs.

    57. Yankee_Doodle
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Keep them as defenders. Remember a couple years ago when people said that they should reclassify #10s into their own category bc they were the high scoring players at the time? No one talks about that anymore.

      Tactics come and go. Overreacting and changing classifications after a single season of prevalent 3 at the back is unwise.

  3. willgriggsonfire
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    How did Keane play? Didn't watch the match.

    1. Funkyav
      • 17 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      very assured apart from a second half error. Good game.

      Smalling looked clumsy by comparison

      1. Eden Hazardous
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Smalling was terrible

    2. GREEN IS GOOD
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Pretty pretty good.

    3. willgriggsonfire
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      He has looked good bar a few errors.
      Him and Pickford likely to be in one of the top 6-7 clubs next year?

    4. UnitedFan
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I wish he chose to play with us (ROI), thats all I'm saying.

      1. Funkyav
        • 17 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        or at Utd even?

        1. UnitedFan
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Wouldn't mind that, but would really love it if he chose to play for ROI. We need new, young CBs

  4. Lav
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Have not posted all week, early ideas for this lot?

    Pickford
    Alonso / Coleman / Robertson
    Mane / Eriksen / Siggy / King
    Aguero / Lukaku / Carroll

    Foster / Roon / Pieters / Brunt

    2 FT 2.0 ITB

    1. Eden Hazardous
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Brunt >Valencia is a popular move

      1. Lav
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Yeah it is, between him and Walker for me. Brunt definitely will be out this week.

      2. willgriggsonfire
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        +1

    2. UnitedFan
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Brunt to Valencia is a good move

    3. Gregor
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Brunt to Valencia.

    4. ILOVEBAPS
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Foster > DDG

  5. Karan_G14
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Would you loose Alonso in GW31 (MCI, bou, mun) in order to bring Sanchez & Ibra back?

    Rest of the backline will be:

    Walker Valencia Coleman Chambers Stephens

    Appreciate your thoughts!

    1. UnitedFan
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Would be hard to ditch Alonso, but having both Sanchez and Ibra would be more important than a Chelsea defender imo, so yeah, just be sure there's no other route

      1. Karan_G14
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Only other route is Wildcard before GW34.

        1. UnitedFan
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          I'd ditch, but it's tough

    2. Gregor
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I would lose Coleman before Alonso.

      1. Karan_G14
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Coleman doesn't factilate the transfers I got him at 5.5 and he's better fixtures than Alonso in the medium term.

    3. A.T
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Yes if that was the only way.

      1. Karan_G14
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Looks the only possible way or Wildcard before GW34.

        1. ILOVEBAPS
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Anything wrong with WC in 34? Just asking as I'm not in the know.

    4. willgriggsonfire
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Yes, this looks good even without Alonso.

  6. makaveli123
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Just a friendly reminder:
    The cut off date for 10 YCs is the 2nd Sunday in April, i.e. GW32/ 08.04.2017.

    1. UnitedFan
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Thanks. Let's hope de Roon holds out for the DGW34

      1. Rhinos
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Yep those 4 to 6 points will come in handy

        1. UnitedFan
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Will 😉

  7. tjorvennn
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Since there are so many teams who are expected to have dgw in round 37, wouldn't be better to do an early wildcard since it will not be difficult to have 15 dgw benchboost players in round 37?

    1. willgriggsonfire
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Yes, depends on your team's position right now.

    2. Ramboros
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Depends on how many players you consider essential for the full duration of the season.

      I'd like to go heavily into Man Utd, Palace and Middlesbrough and WC in GW36. If Southampton and Arsenal have a DGW in GW36, I'll bring in those players on the WC. If they have a DGW in GW35, I'd like to bring in Arsenal players and then WC them out.

      If you want to bring in players from teams that only has one DGW in 37, then it is probably better to WC early.

      My main objection towards WC'ing before GW36 is that Rose, Hazard and Kane are currently injured.

  8. boc610
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Vardy has without doubt the dumbest dive in football and thats why he'l never get pens. its like he's body popping the way he flips himself over the keeper.

  9. Eze Really?
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Everton 1st 11 next season

    Pickford
    Coleman Williams Keane Bertrand
    Schneiders Gueye
    Lookman Sncneiders Bolasie
    Gabiadini

    1. Annie
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      too many Schneiders

    2. Eden Hazardous
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Gabbiadini .... It's not FIFA

      1. Eze Really?
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        try doing it on a phone when you are my age!

    3. Eze Really?
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Sorry, Siggy

    4. Eze Really?
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Correction Siggy

      1. Annie
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Who signed Barkley?

        1. Rupert The Horse
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Spurs

        2. Eze Really?
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Spurs

          1. ILOVEBAPS
            • 14 Years
            9 years, 3 months ago

            Poor signing imo. Unnecessary. Who will be replace?

    5. A.T
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Pickford
      Coleman Keane VvD Baines
      Davies Gueye Schneiderlin
      Barkley Siggy
      Lukaku

      I'll be happy with that.

      1. Eze Really?
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        I would Like VVD but maybe going bigger.
        Son also a part x with Barkley maybe?
        I think Williams will be captain

        1. A.T
          • 16 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          I've not been impressed with Williams myself. I think we need 2 new cb's. Barkley has been great since Xmas, I'd like to see him be given the chance to prove he can carry it on into next season.

    6. Funkyav
      • 17 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Pickford, Keane, Bertrand, Gabbiadini, Siggy]

      Are Everton about to spend £200m?

      1. Eze Really?
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        100 mil after Barkley and Kaku sales

  10. ILOVEBAPS
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Best move? 2FT's
    Really unsure why to do.

    Pickford
    Alonso Baines Coleman
    Eriksen Manè King Siggy
    Lukaku Carroll Aguero

    Heaton Phillips* McAuley Kingsley

    a. Phillips > (£7.7)
    b. Kun > Deeney
    c. Do B and then Phillips > Sanchez/Alli -4
    d. Kun > Vardy
    e. Do D and then Baines/McAuley > Valencia/Walker?
    f. Baines/McAuley > Val/Walker

    1. Eze Really?
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Phillips/Tadic
      Baines/Valencia

      1. ILOVEBAPS
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Cheers! Any reason in particular why Tadic over say... Pedro?

        1. Eze Really?
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Extra DGW. more minutes

    2. willgriggsonfire
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Tadic if Gab not fit. He looks good for the DGW anyway.

    3. St. Joseph
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Baines / Coleman to Valencia

      And plan for Sanchez

    4. Siva Mohan
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Baines >> Valencia and save FT

    5. bitm2007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Is C for a hit ? 2FT's are stated on the first line of your post.

    6. ViperStripes
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      a and save the other FT, team is g2g for this GW

    7. Athletic Bilbo
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I've got Colemans Beans too, think it's too much for next pair of fixtures. I'd take Beans out of your basket and add a pack of Walkers or some Empanadas (a tasty treat from Ecuador).

  11. Rupert The Horse
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Jonas Olson leaves West Brom for Swedish club Djurgarden.

    1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Is that in Norway?

      1. makaveli123
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Sweden

        1. makaveli123
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Oh, you were probably joking 🙂

      2. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        No way

    2. _Make
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Makes sense, otherwise how does Djurgarden grow?

      1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Is their women's team called the Lady Gardens?

        1. _Make
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Indubitably

  12. TLF
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Would you rather have DDG or Valdes between now and GW35? I'm considering a Man U double up in defence with DDG along with Valencia.

    1. GoonerByron
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Was going to go Valdes as I already have Jones and Valencia, but may now get DDG and do Jones -> Boro def because of Jones injury.

    2. Siva Mohan
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      DDG

    3. willgriggsonfire
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Valdes for now. DDG after DGW 34.

      1. TLF
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Interesting, why do you think Valdes would be a better pick ?

  13. Siva Mohan
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    get DDG or Valencia?

    1. Gregor
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      DDG. Preferably both.

      1. Siva Mohan
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        cash issues.. DDG more nailed during packed April fixtures?

        1. makaveli123
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Valencia the safest pick

          1. makaveli123
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 3 months ago

            DDG*

    2. willgriggsonfire
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Valencia.

    3. UnitedFan
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Valencia

    4. A.T
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Valencia

    5. Siva Mohan
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Valencia it is then.

    6. Eden Hazardous
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Valencia

  14. Heintorg
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Whats the better move here?

    Antonio & Evans -> Tadic & Valencia
    Antonio & Llorente -> Redmond & Vardy

    Thanks in advance:)

    1. Gregor
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      First one, Llorente is playing Boro at home.

      1. willgriggsonfire
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        +1

    2. Heintorg
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Thanks guys!

  15. Siva Mohan
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Nacho Monreal says he understands that Wenger has renewed his contract and says Özil and Alexis are waiting for his decision.

    1. A.T
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Before leaving or staying?

      1. A.T
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Bit of both probably

        1. Siva Mohan
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          more ambitious Sanchez may want him out..

    2. willgriggsonfire
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Don't know what to say really. He does divide opinion.
      I think he should remain for one last season and phase out his exit.

      1. Funkyav
        • 17 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        he should have done that years ago

        But as I am not an Arsenal fan, I hope he stays for life!

  16. John t penguin
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Map of Scotland needed for article writer

    1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Och aye the noo

  17. klavan
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Any suggestion to this WC team

    Pickford, Valdes
    Alonso, Walker, Valencia, Barragan or Fabio, Yoshida
    Alexis, Mane, Alli, Eriksen, Pedro
    Vardy, Defoe, Barnes

    Attack is weak but it is calculated risk for me

    1. St. Joseph
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Too risky to calculate.

      Upgrade FW

      1. willgriggsonfire
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        +1

        1. klavan
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Is it better with this transfers: defoe, mane and pedro>Costa, siggy and lanzini ?

    2. Pirlø's Pen
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      On a WC too. Wouldn't want Barnes at all as he has no DGW & dross fixtures.

      This is what my team looks like if this helps;

      Valdes Pickford
      Alonso Walker Bertrand Valencia Fabio
      Sanchez Alli Pedro Tadic Sané
      Lukaku Vardy Negredo.

      1. klavan
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Good team.. but dont want lukaku and sane for the next 2 gws. Who would you get for 3rd striker if you playing with 5 mids, cant afford negredo?

  18. Egyptian Giza
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    play baines or pieters?

    1. St. Joseph
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      The one with PK

    2. UnitedFan
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Baines

    3. willgriggsonfire
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Baines

  19. xtina
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    What to do this week..? 2FT, 3.9m in bank
    Coutinho -> sanchez or alli? Plus another transfer??

    randolph/grant
    alonso/coleman/mawson/nyom/fabio
    siggy/king/de roon/mane/coutinho
    costa/carroll/lukaku

    1. willgriggsonfire
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Sanchez.

  20. ViperStripes
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Thoughts on Ayew?

    1. willgriggsonfire
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Did start last match but can't be sure of it. Better options available.

  21. Eden ACCOUNT CLOSED
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Vardy to Ibra after 31 deadline - Check

    1. ViperStripes
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Checked and A ok

  22. Yxz
    • 15 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Why is there so much interest DDG and Valencia?

    1. ViperStripes
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      GW34 DGW

    2. xtina
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      same question...they have city that week and then spurs/arsenal...

    3. ViperStripes
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Or the sarrcy answer.....no reason, no reason at all, just carry on not looking at upcoming fixtures

    4. Pasqualinho
      • 17 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      2 home fixtures to come, then Sunderland away. A real park-the-bus fixture at home to Chelsea the following week then a DGW. Pretty decent fixtures for anyone wanting a defender, I'd say. I don't have any yet, though.

    5. Eden Hazardous
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I have interest in Valencia only atm cos of his attacking threat + chance of him being a Wingback

    6. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Most nailed Man U players, along with Ibra

  23. Pirlø's Pen
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Is Hazard worth the extra 3m over Pedro? Leaning towards no.

    1. Dreams
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      No imo.

    2. I Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Don't think so.

    3. Eden Hazardous
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      For me , yes.

      Pedro is not nailed to start all games , Hazard is more involved in our attacks and is on pens

      1. Pirlø's Pen
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Hmm, yeah obviously the better option just don't know if its worth 3m. Whenever hazard has hauled big Pedro has come close. Not as if you are biased at all anyways 😉

        1. Eden Hazardous
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          😉

    4. willgriggsonfire
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Depends on the rest of your team.
      Otherwise, yes.

      1. Eden Hazardous
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Agree with this

    5. WE GO FOR IT
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Maybe not. But I'd rather have Hazard over Pedro.

  24. Giovanni Giorgio
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Does Antonio's injury affect Snodgrass' playing time in a possible way?

    1. Pirlø's Pen
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      In a positive way i'd say.

      1. Giovanni Giorgio
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Positive** Lmao. Just got my wisdom tooth removed. Don't do drugs kids.

      2. willgriggsonfire
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Positive for those who own him maybe?

    2. Funkyav
      • 17 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      there is also the Ayew issue.

      Would like to keep Snodgrass, got other issues but if he isnt starting then he has to go for me

  25. Dreams
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    How many people here are done with their gw 34 planning?

    1. Pirlø's Pen
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Sort of, planned for the Sou/Ars double too.

      1. Dreams
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Great. Are you playing the Norway fpl?

        1. Pirlø's Pen
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Not yet, might join for a laugh but like most haven't a clue who anyone is except Bendtner.

          1. Dreams
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 3 months ago

            Great. I'm just so bored of people asking why is Valencia popular and Alli/ Eriksen. This league is helpful in navigating through the international break.

    2. I Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I am but plans always subject to change. Only have 0.1 left over for my current plan so good chance I won't be able to afford when the time comes.

    3. Pasqualinho
      • 17 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      In good time. I'm not even done with 30 yet.

      1. Dreams
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        I expect you to come up with a good one.

    4. WE GO FOR IT
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Nowhere near done. Plan keeps changing everyday.

    5. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Basic outline for me:

      Valencia this week, Ibra in 31, maybe save in 32, Zaha in 33, hopefully 2 x FT for 34, WC in 35/36 (depending on when Ars v Sou is)

      Never gonna work out like this though is it 😀

      1. Dreams
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        It does sometimes. You never know.

  26. ⚽️ Dingo ⚽️
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Heaton
    Alonso / Valencia / Baines
    Mane / Alli / Sterling / Sigurdsson
    Kun / Lukaku / Llorente

    Jakupovic / McAuley / Maguire / T. Carroll

    1ft, .5 itb, WC and BB available.

    Where to with this team?

    1. Dreams
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      What happened to that lovely grav of yours?

      1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Seems to have turned into Eugene from the Walking Dead

        1. ⚽️ Dingo ⚽️
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Just some Aussie culture for you all......

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RjC-vh06_c

          1. Dreams
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 3 months ago

            Nice culture.

    2. Dreams
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Team looks good. Save.

    3. I Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Save or Baines -> Vertonghen. Probably save though. Looks like you'll need to move some pieces around to get Sanchez in 31 so the 2 FTs will come in handy.

    4. willgriggsonfire
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Looks good.
      Get Sanchez before the double if possible.

    5. Egyptian Giza
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      it's so weird now with the new grav. I'd punt on Vardy for Kun or a Saints mid for Sterling

    6. Dreams
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      And the good old grav is back.

  27. The Wise Owl
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Antonio to 7.1 mid

    1) Lanzini
    2) Ayew
    3) King
    4) Tadic
    5) Lallana

    1. Dreams
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      4

    2. TLF
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Tadic for me, stats are good as are fixtures.

    3. willgriggsonfire
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      4

  28. barracuda
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Afternoon troops- I am thinking of doing King to Mahrez. The next 3-4 are tough for King. Would you do this?

    1. Dreams
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      What's your midfield?

      1. barracuda
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Will be Mahrez Sanchez Siggy Mane and Firm

        1. Dreams
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          No. Get a spurs mid.

          1. barracuda
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 3 months ago

            Great shout. WOuld you get Eriksen or Alli?

            1. Dreams
              • 9 Years
              9 years, 3 months ago

              Alli

              1. barracuda
                • 9 Years
                9 years, 3 months ago

                OK, thank you Dreams!

  29. _Make
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    @fpldreams sorry if I missed it but you you have a public league pin for the Norwegian FPL?

    1. Dreams
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      No. 3769-1041. Ffs league. Not a public one.

      1. _Make
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Many thanks, really looking forward to this one. Thanks for arranging and for the interesting and useful info.

        1. Dreams
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          I haven't arranged it. It's Team Cruel.

  30. Egyptian Giza
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    would I be crazy if i want to save my FT?
    heaton
    coleman alonso baines (or pieters)
    mane coutinho siggy king sterling
    lukaku llorente?

    1. RoLiv
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Don't think Everton can keep clean sheet at Anfield and they have United up next. So its better to swap one of them to Valencia or a spus def