Community

The Case for a Gameweek 37 Free Hit

There has been a lot of discussion on when the best time to use the free hit chip is. Initially everyone seemed to agree that the Gameweek with the fewest fixtures (Gameweek 31) would be the best time. With just four matches then this makes sense as you can forfeit having to drip-feed in players who don’t blank in the preceding Gameweeks.

Then the consensus shifted to Gameweek 35, which is sandwiched inbetween the two likely double Gameweeks. The idea here being that you don’t have to worry about having to ditch or bench double Gameweek assets who miss a fixture – you can simply free hit in Gameweek 35 and play this reduced set of fixtures in complete isolation, leaving time to focus on the doubles.

But could we see the consensus change for a third time? Is there an argument for playing the free hit in double Gameweek 37?

The Case For Gameweek 37 Free Hit

There are 12 teams that may have a double Gameweek 34.

1) Arsenal
2) Brighton
3) Burnley
4) Chelsea
5) Leicester
6) Man City
7) Man United
8) Newcastle
9) Southampton
10) Swansea
11) Tottenham
12) West Ham

Six of these 12 have a strong chance of a blank in Gameweek 35, which means they are likely to have another double in Gameweek 37. Manchester City and Swansea have a 20% chance of blanking in Gameweek 35 so they are not included in this list.

1) Brighton
2) Chelsea
3) Leicester
4) Man United
5) Southampton
6) Tottenham

If you are planning to free hit in Gameweek 35, then during your second wildcard you will need to stock up on double gameweek players for Gameweek 34 and – crucially – for Gameweek 37 also at the same time.

The means you have to try to accommodate two double Gameweek fixture lists with just the one wildcard.

This makes things difficult because you are trying to build one team of 15 players that accommodates two rounds of fixtures three weeks apart. You are trying to maximise your double Gameweek 34 allocation, while at the same time having one eye on the teams with a double in Gameweek 37. Do you bring in more Brighton, Chelsea, Leicester, Man United, Spurs and Southampton players in early and have them in place and ready for Gameweek 37? If so, then this may mean you have to reduce your allocation for players with just one double in Gameweek 34.

In contrast, you can wildcard before double Gameweek in 34 and, essentially have another wildcard and another fresh team before the second double by using your free hit in Gameweek 37. There is no need to move out the players from the seven teams who have a double in 34 but don’t have a double in 37 in the intervening weeks. With the use of your free hit as a de facto third wildcard, you can tackle double Gameweek 34 full on with a clean slate and then tackle double Gameweek 37 with yet another clean slate (minus the double Gameweek 34 players whose double has been and gone).

Conclusion

In summary, the argument for saving your free hit beyond Gameweek 35 is that two wildcards are better than one – and the free hit chip can effectively be another wildcard for Gameweek 37. With just 3.25 projected blanks in Gameweek 35 and with Burnley, Manchester City, Newcastle, Swansea, Spurs and West Ham having a double in Gameweek 34 and a fixture in Gameweek 35, it is possible to get a reasonably strong 11 players out in Gameweek 35 without a free hit.

Of course, you won’t have the freedom to completely maximise the reduced fixture list in Gameweek 35, but you will be able to have 11 double Gameweek players in Gameweek 37 with ease and you won’t have to use transfers to move on your players with just one double between 34 and 37. What’s more, all five of those teams that double in Gameweek 37 look to have something to play for towards the end of the season whether it be a European place, avoiding relegation or securing a top half finish in the league.

Crucially, however, free hitting in Gameweek 37 does mean that the triple captain chip cannot be played in the same week.

Obviously this won’t be a problem for those who used the chip on Harry Kane during the double in Gameweek 22, but, for those who still have the chip, then a surprise deployment in Gameweek 31 could really propel you up the ranks in a gameweek were fixtures – and therefore points – are likely to be very scarce, indeed.

Ultimately the use of the free hit in Gameweek 37 boils down to this question: if you can get an adequately strong 11 out in Gameweek 35 without a free hit, wouldn’t you rather have a 15-player bench boost during double Gameweek 34 followed by an 11-player semi-bench boost in double Gameweek 37?

168 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Stat Sloth
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Triple captain LIV asset in gw31? Are you stark raving... waaaaait a minute... nevermind 😀

    1. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      GW31 is looking like a very low scoring week. A successful triple captain chip punt (if Mane explodes and Salah is quiet, for example) could be a devastating rank boost. It's just an idea.

      1. President Giggs
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        But only temporary, an extra 10 points in 31 doesn't make up for an extra 20 that may be gained by TCers in 37.

        1. Limited & Mediocre Mana…
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          This

        2. Volley127
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

  2. Sleep Talk
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    This is an intriguing idea! And for me, who've already spent the TC chip, and who's not using the FH chip in gw 31, it's definitely an option. Thanks, I'll keep this in mind!

    1. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Wow. A positive comment! 😯

      Thank you 🙂

  3. chaser123
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Interesting read and definitely food for thought!

    Just a question though, how can it only be 5 teams that are over 60% likely to have a blank? Surely it must be an even number (I think either 6 or 8?). My thoughts are that the following 8 teams are likely to blank...

    Bournemouth
    Man Utd
    Brighton
    Tottenham
    Leicester
    Southampton
    Chelsea
    Huddersfield

    1. @FPL_liverbird (liverpoolfa…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Are you looking for your second/third striker for GW31 to perform well this week or are you already decided on who you want?

      Currently on my radar to partner Wilson:

      Mounie
      Benteke
      King

    2. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      I was looking at teams with two lots of doubles. I think I may overlooked Spurs. 🙁

  4. @FPL_liverbird (liverpoolfa…
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Are you looking for your second/third striker for GW31 to perform well this week or are you already decided on who you want?

    Currently on my radar to partner Wilson:

    Mounie
    Benteke
    King

  5. darrellb
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    wouldnt spurs also have two DGW and a blank in gw35!!!

    1. potatoace
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      They have 1 dgw 1 bgw atm if they get to the semis they will have another dgw

      1. potatoace
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Brighton v Tot gw35

        One of them get to semis and we have 2dgw 2bgw

      2. darrellb
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        exactly. so they have a greater than 60% chance of a blank and shouldve been included in the numbers. Makes the case for using the FH chip in 37 weaker since players like kane and son could also be part of a double wildcard squad.

        1. potatoace
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          Yep agreed. According to bencrellin that fixture has a 84.55% chance of a blank.

          1. darrellb
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 1 month ago

            which takes away a big part of the argument here of "trying to build one team of 15 players that accommodates two rounds of fixtures three weeks apart"

    2. agueroooooney
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Yeh the article completely forgets about Spurs, which is an important part of the decision

      1. Epic Fail
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        As long as the article gets published, facts are irrelevant.

        1. Now I'm Panicking
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          #hourlyrate

    3. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      I've asked Jonty to amend that bit.

      There will still be double the number of doubles in 34 (12) than 37 (6). My main point was that maximising both of them with 1 Wildcard is pretty darn tough.

      1. TorresMagic™
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 14 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Could easily be 8 in GW37.

        1. FPL Virgin
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          Only a 20% chance of that.

          1. TorresMagic™
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 14 Years
            6 years, 1 month ago

            It's 0% going off above 😉
            Quite a high % tbh.

  6. Now I'm Panicking
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    "with Burnley, Manchester City, Newcastle, Swansea, Spurs and West Ham having a double in Gameweek 34"

    Not sure how you know which teams have a DGW in GW34 when the fixtures haven't been announced yet?

    Interesting article though side from this - cheers 🙂

    1. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Thanks J-man.

  7. Pasqualinho
    • 14 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    A big fly in the ointment for this strategy is those who want to load up the bench and bench boost the doubles. You can't play it in DGW34 because yo're preparing a team for DGW35, so will have a bare bench for that one - and you can't play it in GW37 because you're using your free hit that week. But for those without BB, it's viable.

  8. Athletic Bilbo
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    To anybody reading this and planning their chip strategy: Warning!

    Aside from the validity of the actual strategy, assumptions in this article about who will blank and double are seriously flawed, particularly around GW35. No mention of Arsenal playing, and dodgy re: Swansea, City, Spurs playing in 35. All kinds of confusion around Brighton v Spurs fixture. No mention of other teams likely to double in 37 such as Bournemouth.

    Consider the strategy by all means but ignore the statements around who plays when

  9. Buzzy
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    That's different virg.
    I really don't like the idea of tc chip on a gwk 31 player though.
    if you're tc salah you're only getting 1 extra set of his points as a lot of people will be captaining him anyway, if you're tc a differential that's too big a gamble for me.
    I'd rather tc whoever I think has the best chance of scoring points in a dgw.
    I think you're wasting you're tc chip.

    1. Ragabolly
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Agreed, minimal gain in 31 when everybody will already captin your triple captain. DGWs have many alternatives to captaincy and your TC has a much higher gain ceiling over non TC’ers.

    2. Buzzy
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Virg, if you're set on following this strategy would you be better off using you're tc chip on whoever is going for the golden boot that you think has the best fixture in gw38 rather than someone in gw31 ?
      interesting article, thanks for posting it.

      1. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Thanks for the kind words. TC in 38 is certainly an idea. I wouldn't definitively say to someone that they should use the TC in 31. I'm just saying that a successful punt could be beyond incredible for your rank because it's likely to be very low scores all round for everyone.

    3. maditass
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Imagine if you had used TC on Salah in gw31. Not so sure if you actually will get 29 points extra in a dgw with TC active. But nobody knew he would smash in 4 goals :-D. And I'm jelous on all those that took a gamble on it while I myself didn't dare 🙁

  10. Ragabolly
    • 14 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    I think it’s way too early to talk about GW 37, so many unknowns before then including of course the fixtures.

    The sound strategy imo is to save FH in GW 31, and then plan the use of chips according to how the events will unfold.

    1. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      On that basis I do find it strange that people believe their GW32 WC will stretch to GW37 doubles with just 3 or so transfers (FH35) before 37 ... many will be praying for the FPL gods to be kind to them 🙂

      1. Ragabolly
        • 14 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Agreed

      2. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Thank you - this is exactly what I'm trying to say!

        So much time between a GW 32/33 Wildcard and DGW37. So much can happen inbetween. And on top of that you're trying to maximise your GW34 BB with the same Wildcard. It just sounds too hard for a lesser mortal like me!

        1. TopMarx
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 11 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          I think a GW33 WC followed by GW34 BB gets the most out of those two chips. If the FH is then 35 or 37 depends on who progresses in the FA Cup imo - Spurs having a DGW in 37 would make a big difference. But remaining flexible is key, and certainly FH in GW37 is a valid option. But a GW33 WC and we will know the situation about who misses GW35 by then, so we can plan accordingly.

          1. FPL Virgin
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 1 month ago

            Well said. I wanted to put forward a polemic for the free hit in GW37 because there is a too much agreement around the FH in GW35.

  11. EWH2020
    • 10 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Depoitre to

    a)Wilson
    b)Mounie

  12. TopMarx
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 11 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Food for thought Virgin, thank you for this!

    1. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Thank you, TopMarx 🙂

  13. Hotdogs for Tea
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    There are many people with varying chips still in hand and this article looks at alternatives - a lot of ‘what ifs’ obviously because fixtures are not set, but a good thought provoking series of possibilities.

    We may yet see Spurs (or Chelsea if they get put to the sword by Barce) having their double set in GW32 or 33 which would free up that elusive double for the TC and allow for the FH in 37.

    1. Athletic Bilbo
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Premier league gets fined by UEFA for scheduling fixtures on a European night

      1. Pasqualinho
        • 14 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Not any more

      2. potatoace
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Wasn't that scrapped last season?

      3. Athletic Bilbo
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        That’s very interesting, so the rearranged fixtures could be over six small double game weeks for the tv companies!

        1. Now I'm Panicking
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          Theoretically yes, but I'm not sure Sky would want to put a PL game up against an English team playing in the latter stages of the CL on the other channel unless they had to.

        2. Hotdogs for Tea
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          It is strange that the 31 fixtures have not simply been slotted in to 34, the only reason thay springs to mind is that PL is considering other dates too ?

          1. Mark
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 17 Years
            6 years, 1 month ago

            No, it's the broadcasting. They have to wait for FAC QF to be played before they can know who gets the Thursday game for example.

            1. Now I'm Panicking
              • 9 Years
              6 years, 1 month ago

              So are you saying all GW31 postponements will be played GW34?

            2. Hotdogs for Tea
              • 8 Years
              6 years, 1 month ago

              West Ham v Stoke is on the Monday of GW34, Man U v WBA on the Sunday, so surely only if Man U beat Brighton then the re-arranged WHU v Man U needs to be on the Thursday because WHU play on the Monday ? Why would other games be played on the Thursday of GW34 ?

              1. Now I'm Panicking
                • 9 Years
                6 years, 1 month ago

                Shhhh - I'm trying to get an exclusive out of him!

                1. Hotdogs for Tea
                  • 8 Years
                  6 years, 1 month ago

                  😉

  14. agueroooooney
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Well thought out article.

    One thing to flag is you haven't mentioned Spurs in your list of teams which are likely to have two double gameweeks which important in my opinion.

    I had been of this view before FA Cup round of 16/quarter finals draw had been made. Afterwards I'm kind of shying away from it, not dismissing it by any means.

    We'll know even more after the next FA Cup round and the confirmation of the dates for the rescheduled games.

    I'm going get to just assume the GW31 postponed games are rescheduled to GW34 so as to not have too many variables.

    In my opinion, it all depends on how many players you want from Chelsea, Spurs, Leicester and Man United (who all have two double gameweeks) . If you're looking at 7+ then your best best is probably to FH in GW35.

    If this is the case, you will already have 7 (or more) strong DGW players for 37. The players you have for 35 are likely weaker players (as most players from the 4 teams above are expensive). Some teams will fancy keeping Salah as well if he's battling to win the golden boot. So that's now 8+ players you're happy with for 37 and you have 2 FTs. You can use those 2 transfers to field 10 very strong players for 37, and also use your FH chip in 35 to the 11 optimum players for 35. If you do take 8 or 9 players from the 4 teams above, you could quite easily end up with 11 strong players for GW37.

    The other side to this is if you only want 5 or 6 players out of those teams. Now you could better off holding the FH chip until 37, as you can use 2 free transfers for blank gameweek players and bench the other 4.

    In my opinion it all hinges on the amount of players you want who have two doubles. Personally, I have not made this decision but think I'm slightly leaning towards FH 35.

    I also don't have my triple captain chip left (burnt it on Kane), which gets rid of another variable for me. If I did have it, I'm not sure I'd want to play it in a single gameweek.

    Sorry for the long post, I think it's all logical and relevant though.

    tl;dr
    If your number of players from Chelsea, Spurs, Man United, Leicester for DGW34 is;

    ≥7 = FH in 35 (2 FTs for 9 or more DGW37 players + Salah if you keep him)

    ≤6 = FH in 37 (2 FTs to get rid of 2 of these for BGW35 players and bench the other 4)

    This is on the assumption that the players with doubles in 37 blank in 35 and vice versa, which is likely.

    1. agueroooooney
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      **Chelsea, Spurs, Leicester and Man United are all likely to have two double gameweeks. Not guaranteed obviously.

      Also I'll have to leave my 3rd option for another post. Which is the argument for:

      FH 34
      WC 36
      BB 37

      Haven't seen anything written about that

      1. Athletic Bilbo
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Based on your FA cup predictions, Brighton and Southampton would also double double along with those 4 teams

        1. agueroooooney
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          Correct, they do not appeal to me for both doubles though. Can't think of a Southampton player I'd like and Brighton would have a second double of MUN TOT

          1. Athletic Bilbo
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 1 month ago

            McCarthy could be a cheap gk solution

            1. agueroooooney
              • 9 Years
              6 years, 1 month ago

              Potentially, not a fan personally. Either way that doesn't affect either strategy I've discussed does it?

              1. Athletic Bilbo
                • 7 Years
                6 years, 1 month ago

                Of course it does. If you are talking about a strategy where people are deciding when to free hit based on the amount of players with ‘double doubles’, it’s probably best to include all the teams it applies to, no? Particularly those with cheaper options, whether you would select them or not.

          2. Hotdogs for Tea
            • 8 Years
            6 years, 1 month ago

            If you are playing a BB then nailed mid priced players from such weaker teams are great for the bench boost ... of course you don’t want to carry 6 mill players on your bench for any number of games but WC36 & BB 37 is a different matter 🙂

    2. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Thank you for brilliant reply!

      For me, the free hit is a Wildcard and an 11-man double gameweek BB in one. I think it's fiendishly difficult to nail the double in 34 and in 37 with just one Wildcard way back in GW 32/33. I'd much rather have two bites of the cherry!

      People will say GW37 will be a rotation nightmare for teams with 2 fixtures in 1 week because it is near the end of the season, but I think a knowledgeable, decent top 10K FPL manager should be able to do it relatively easily. It's not that hard.

    3. @FPL_liverbird (liverpoolfa…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Great thoughts, should be hot topic'd I think!

      Very clearly laid out and makes perfect sense.

      Personally I'm sticking with GW35 FH with all chips left and WC'ing GW32 where I'll look at the teams more.

    4. Vlad Tepes
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Great info!

    5. Jafalad
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      I like your ideas, Virg. I have never seen you think like this before. 😉

      1. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        🙂

  15. seanie3
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    With Williams missing the next two games for Everton, will Holgate play the next two or more likely it will be jag? will Sam go to 3 5 2 with Holgate, Jag & Keane?

    1. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      I think Jag plays.

  16. TorresMagic™
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Doesn't Tottenham make it 6 teams?

    1. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Can you edit the article, please, TM?

      1. John t penguin
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Like trump did with his tweet about Baldwin?

        1. FPL Virgin
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          Pretty much, yeah.

      2. TorresMagic™
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 14 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        You'd have to edit other parts of the article and weakens your FH37 case.
        Email Jonty like always.

        1. FPL Virgin
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          I'm not really concerned about the teams who play in 37. The point I'm trying to make is how difficult it is for your GW 32/33 Wildcard to get all your ducks in a row for DGW 34 and 37. I'd much rather tackle 37 in isolation by treating the free hit as a 3rd Wildcard.

          1. TorresMagic™
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 14 Years
            6 years, 1 month ago

            GW35 is also a FH or WC. I'll be interested to see what kind of mess you'll own that GW.

  17. diesel001
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    GW32: Wildcard
    GW34: Bench Boost
    GW35: Free Hit
    GW37 Triple Captain (Kane!)

    1. @FPL_liverbird (liverpoolfa…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Yup this is pretty much it. I haven't looked in to what you can make as a 15man squad for GW34 and how many DGW players.

      I have 104.4 TV so I'm hoping to create something pretty decent for the home stretch to get my rank up from 30k. Top 10k would be great!

    2. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      You're asking an awful lot of your GW32 Wildcard to get you to GW37 in great shape.

      1. TorresMagic™
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 14 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        4 FTs, only need 11 in GW37.

        1. FPL Virgin
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          Much like GW31, your transfers are influenced by planning for a future gameweek. Never a great situation to be in especially if there is a team with plum fixtures 34 to 37 but with no double in 37.

          1. TorresMagic™
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 14 Years
            6 years, 1 month ago

            FH covers GW35, the only team like that is Pool so Salah there.

        2. xRedArrow
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          Well technically there’s 2 FT you’ll use before DGW34 to tune your B.B. to form/injuries.

          With FH35, you’ll have ONLY 2 FTs to prepare for DGW37...

          1. SADIO SANÉ
            • 8 Years
            6 years, 1 month ago

            yep, gonna be some nice GW36 benches knocking about

      2. seanie3
        • 12 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        When would you WC?

        1. FPL Virgin
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          33.

  18. xRedArrow
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    It makes a lot of sense, but it all depends on how many 2 DGWers you want I’m your GW32 WC (Looking like at least 6-7).

    Argument for: a wildcard based on Bench Boost GW34 would have the funds distributed on the bench (to maximize points). While using the FH in GW35 allows you to minimize your bench to the bare bones and maximize your starting 11.

    4FTs may not be enough to undo the damage and that’s anticipating injuries/form.

    but do we really want to load up on SOT/BHA assets in the FH???

    Finally it all depends on Spurs for me, if they blank in GW35 I’m against this strategy.

    Otherwise I’m in...

    1. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Glad to have you onboard 🙂

  19. Lazarus Star
    • 10 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    @FPLVirgin Nice article. I considered the same question a few days ago....

    https://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/2018/03/05/line-up-lessons-gameweek-29-part-one-2/?hc_page=2#hc_comment_17763071

    I hadn’t done the analysis as you did but my thought was with no WC I’d likely already have and carry most of the DGW players in DGW34 to the end of season, but less likely the DGW37 players.

    Looking at GW31 options, using a chip on a blank Gameweek felt like throwing money after old rope.

    1. Lazarus Star
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      But also, surely you want to get maximum points out of chip so a TC on a BGW is no different to playing it at anytime, it’s only going to pay off for that week.

      A well played TC on a BGW player will boost your OR that week, but hitting 60 in GW31 on an average of 30 isn’t as good overall as hitting 115 in GW34 on an average of 70.

      1. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Good point but I'd rather free hit in 11 cherry picked players with 2 fixtures than a use the TC. I think there is more points available that way.

        Wildcarding for 34 and 37 in 32/33 and planning all your transfers inbetween to get to the perfect 11 in 37 seems really tough to do. It needs a mastetplan that is beyond me!

  20. SADIO SANÉ
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    GW31: 8-players
    GW34: 11-DGWers
    GW35: Free Hit
    GW36: WC
    GW37: Bench Boost

    boom

    1. Lazarus Star
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      No TC

      1. SADIO SANÉ
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        nope afraid not, would use it in 34 with this plan if I had it

    2. SADIO SANÉ
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      technically should be 7-players GW31 I suppose, but don't mind taking a couple of hits before 34 - we'll see

    3. FFSbet.com
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Same but going without FH chip in GW35,if i had FH i would probably WC GW32-33.

  21. Jay_
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Sorry mate but messing Spurs up has tarnished the whole article. Spurs likely to blank in 35 is highly significant. As they're out of Europe now, having 2 or 3 Spurs looks a cert on a wildcard. That makes a FH in 35 much more valuable as it's 2 or 3 more players down for 35 on top of the players from the pool of teams you've already mentioned.

      1. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Thanks for the feedback Jay but I have to disagree. Spurs isn't really much of a factor.

        The point I'm trying to make is that you're asking your GW32/33 Wildcard to do an awful lot to maximize two DGWs across 5 to 6 Gameweeks. How can the 15 players you bring in on a Wildcard being the optimum for 34 and the optimum again for 37. Your Wildcard team is going to have to be a contortionist. I'd rather hand-pick any player I want just before 34

        1. FPL Virgin
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          .... With my second Wildcard. And then handpick any player I want just before 37 by using my free hit as another Wildcard in all but name.

          1. TorresMagic™
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 14 Years
            6 years, 1 month ago

            How many different player will your WC team have from GW32 teams in 37. Fall.

        2. TorresMagic™
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 14 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          Of course Spurs are. 3 Spurs in both DGWs and the rest is simple. You only need 11 in 37. Salah is going nowhere so 7 left.

          1. SADIO SANÉ
            • 8 Years
            6 years, 1 month ago

            Spurs pre-35 might not be that brilliant, a couple of difficult fixtures in there - afterwards they are a huge factor though obviously

            1. FPL Virgin
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 7 Years
              6 years, 1 month ago

              Correct.

            2. TorresMagic™
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 14 Years
              6 years, 1 month ago

              City will be champs by then(34). 2 home games in 34 sounds pretty good.

              1. FPL Virgin
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 7 Years
                6 years, 1 month ago

                City will be going after a 100 points in a single season.

                1. FFSbet.com
                  • 8 Years
                  6 years, 1 month ago

                  Pep dont care about that,when he won title with Barca and Bayern he put weaker/younger team in next games.
                  I expect to see Zinchenko,Foden,Diaz,Yaya a lot in last games after title race is over and if they are still in CL.

                  1. FPL Virgin
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 7 Years
                    6 years, 1 month ago

                    I think Pep likes records. He made a big deal over Aguero's goalscoring record this season. Plus do we really think he will roll over and let his main rivals in the league trounce City?

                    1. FFSbet.com
                      • 8 Years
                      6 years, 1 month ago

                      If they are in CL he will play weaker team in PL,even if they are out of CL he will give chance to young players after title race is over.
                      We will see but he has done that before.

                    2. FFSbet.com
                      • 8 Years
                      6 years, 1 month ago

                      We can see some "Basel'' performance after title is won.

          2. FPL Virgin
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 7 Years
            6 years, 1 month ago

            I don't think you understand how powerful it is to do whatever you want with your team and to mould it into the perfect 11 with unlimited transfers on the eve of DGW37.

            1. TorresMagic™
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 14 Years
              6 years, 1 month ago

              Perfect 11 😆
              You must have 120m lying around.

              1. FPL Virgin
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 7 Years
                6 years, 1 month ago

                Nope. I won't have £120m on the night before DGW37. But I will have unlimited transfers while you have 1 FT and hits
                ... And the hope that your GW 32/33 Wildcard plan has held itself together.

        3. Jay_
            6 years, 1 month ago

            Not saying it's optimum but again, you're overlooking a key thing here. The FH in 35 allows you attacking that route of the optimum number of players (14 doublers plus Salah BB 34 and 11 doublers 37) That's the main benefit of FH 35 for me. It allows that to actually be possible, whether it works or not is another thing. As you say, it's a long time to go through form 32 to 37 but on paper at least, imo, that is the best use of a FH. You can have as many players that double in 34 and 37 as possible, without worrying about blank 35. That, imo, is maximising the benefit of the FH Chip. Also, saying Spurs are likely to play 35, makes going the route you're looking at, much more prettier but in reality, they will probably blank 35, adding much more value to FH 35.

            1. FPL Virgin
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 7 Years
              6 years, 1 month ago

              Maybe a better manager than me has the perfect 32/33 Wildcard that smashes 34 and sets themselves up very sweetly for 37 with a few tweaks from their FTs between 34 to 37. It would make my brain melt trying to plan that and so much could happen inbetween, such as injuries and loss of form. With my way, I can cherry pick the perfect team just before 34 and then cherry pick yet another perfect team just before 37.

              1. Jay_
                  6 years, 1 month ago

                  How can you cherry pick before 34 though? You just can't as I see you posted below that "only 3.26" projected blanks in 35.

                  3.26 projected blanks sounds not bad but in reality it'll probably be TOT, LEI, MNU, CHE, SOT, BRI.

                  3 x Spurs, Hazard, Alonso, Maguire, Vardy, Mahrez, DDG and maybe even Gross and BRI def (great 32 and 33 fixs plus 2 x doubles) all look good for a WC. Even if you miss a few of them out, that's still 8 blanking in 35, at least.

                  Your way will mean that when picking in 34, you have to keep a massive eye on 35 and make sure you get a good team out in 35. It's not cherry picking at all in 34, it's restricted, big time. Also, City and Arsenal, the two 'studs' of the teams that dgw34 and don't blank 35, look big banana skins. City will have league won and ARS will be only worried about Europe.

                  1. FPL Virgin
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 7 Years
                    6 years, 1 month ago

                    I think there is enough teams with a double in 34 and a game in 35 to bank the free hit for the double. I can't think of a single gameweek where there wasn't a reason not to get a Player or back a team whether it's rotation, fixture congestion, competition for places or whatever. (A lot of the time it is over-egged and we end up worrying about nothing, by the way.) There's rarely any certainty as we play the game. The best FPL managers accept it and learn to deal with it. And it'll be no different towards the end of the season.

                    1. Jay_
                        6 years, 1 month ago

                        Take Arsenal and City out and you're left with Swansea, West Ham, Burnley and Newcastle. As I said above Arsenal and City look banana skins. That other pool of teams is hardly inspiring and even though West Ham and Swans, in particular have a very good dgw34, in 35 and 36 they play City/Chelsea and arsenal/city)

                        1. FPL Virgin
                          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                          • 7 Years
                          6 years, 1 month ago

                          Personally speaking I feel there is enough there for me to work with.

                          I'm not saying I won't be at a disadvantage by not having complete flexibility in 35, but hopefully I will have more of an advantage in 37 because I will complete flexibility in a gameweek with two lots of fixtures

                          1. Jay_
                              6 years, 1 month ago

                              Well, good luck mate. Your route should be helpful to those that have already spent their TC. Thanks for taking the time to post article and reply to each and every comment too.

                              1. FPL Virgin
                                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                                • 7 Years
                                6 years, 1 month ago

                                Thanks Jay. Genuinely do appreciate you taking the time to read the article and give me your thoughts.

            2. No Luck
              • 12 Years
              6 years, 1 month ago

              GW37 FH is another decent strategy but depends on which games get rearranged to which weeks. Hopefully we will know all before GW32 and can decide then.

              1. FPL Virgin
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 7 Years
                6 years, 1 month ago

                Agreed. Thanks!

                This is just a polemic.

                I was getting tired of no one questioning the widely accepted notion that 35 is the best week for the FH.

            3. RedLightning
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 13 Years
              6 years, 1 month ago

              I think you are considerably underestimating the difficulty of forming a squad that is good for both DGW34 and GW35.

              If there are no Cupsets and fixtures are as expected (big ifs, I know), then I am currently aiming for a wildcard squad containing up to 13 double game players in DGW34 and about 8 double game players in DGW37 but only 2 non-blankers in GW35.

              If you don't play your Free Hit in GW35 then you will have to significantly weaken your DGW34 squad in order to avoid having an extremely weak squad in GW35.

              1. FPL Virgin
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 7 Years
                6 years, 1 month ago

                Obviously nothing is confirmed at this stage but with 3.26 projected blanks in FH35, 3 spaces on my bench, FTs and maybe a hit, I feel confident about a strong 11 in 35 without my FH chip. At the moment, I feel it's a waste to use in 35, when I could use it in 37 to handpick the perfect 11 players with 2 fixtures.

                1. TorresMagic™
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 14 Years
                  6 years, 1 month ago

                  How different do you think the handpicked 11 is going to be from the non FH or WC teams?

                  1. FPL Virgin
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 7 Years
                    6 years, 1 month ago

                    As different as I need it to be. I can do whatever I want for 37, get anyone, punt on anyone, react to anything. That's so powerful when we're talking about 11 players with 2 games in 1 gameweek.

                    I think it's a perception thing. Once you realise that the FH can be a combined Wildcard and 11-man bench boost for a DGW, everything changes.

                    1. TorresMagic™
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • Has Moderation Rights
                      • 14 Years
                      6 years, 1 month ago

                      Sounds like you have given up on 35.

                      1. FPL Virgin
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 7 Years
                        6 years, 1 month ago

                        Not at all. I just don't think a free hit is needed to get a competitive 11 out.

                        So why waste a potent chip on single gameweek players?

                        Double gameweeks are the biggest points-scoring opportunities we have in an FPL season. The free hit could do so much damage here.

                        1. TorresMagic™
                          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                          • Has Moderation Rights
                          • 14 Years
                          6 years, 1 month ago

                          If 35 is easily sorted, plenty can go that route. The stumbling block is the triple captain. Without fixtures/results, it's just hot air.

                          1. FPL Virgin
                            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                            • 7 Years
                            6 years, 1 month ago

                            "Hot air"?!?! : shock:

                            1. TorresMagic™
                              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                              • Has Moderation Rights
                              • 14 Years
                              6 years, 1 month ago

                              Say worst case result for you. Chelsea, Spurs, United and S'ton make the semis.

                              Man City vs Swansea
                              West Brom vs Liverpool
                              Everton vs Newcastle
                              Arsenal vs West Ham
                              Stoke vs Burnley
                              Watford vs Crystal Palace

                              What would be the makeup of your team in 35? Man City, Swansea, Newcastle, Arsenal, West Ham and Burnley would fit the DGW34 and BGW35 criteria.

                              1. FPL Virgin
                                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                                • 7 Years
                                6 years, 1 month ago

                                That's fine. Who knows where the points will come from in 35?

                                I do know that 2 fixtures in 37 is more likely to get you more points than 1 round of fixtures in 35.

                                1. TorresMagic™
                                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                                  • Has Moderation Rights
                                  • 14 Years
                                  6 years, 1 month ago

                                  But it's BGW35 + FH37 vs FH35 + DGW37. SGW players can outscore DGW players whereas players not playing only outscore players scoring -1 etc.

                                2. TorresMagic™
                                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                                  • Has Moderation Rights
                                  • 14 Years
                                  6 years, 1 month ago

                                  Same could be said in 37. Who knows where the points will come from.
                                  Still waiting for that GW35 team.... 😉

                                3. Twisted Saltergater
                                  • 14 Years
                                  6 years, 1 month ago

                                  If someone gets injured in DGW34 ... likely, as those that WC in 33 or 34 may aim for 13 or 14 players that play twice ... that player is going to stay in your squad until GW36!

                                  Anyone not free hitting in GW35, can just transfer them out.

                                  It's easy to pick holes in all the strategies.

                              2. Hotdogs for Tea
                                • 8 Years
                                6 years, 1 month ago

                                What would be your Free Hit team out of that lot - genuinely interested in what you will pick ?

                2. RedLightning
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 13 Years
                  6 years, 1 month ago

                  You might have the perfect handpicked 11 for DGW37, but if you want to field 11 players in GW35 then you will be a long way short of the perfect 15 for DGW34.

                  I would much prefer to have a perfect handpicked 11 for GW35, a strong 15 for GW34 (with no concessions to GW35) and a strong 11 with golden boot chaser Harry Kane as Triple Captain for GW37.

                  1. FPL Virgin
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • 7 Years
                    6 years, 1 month ago

                    Why would you want the perfect 11 for 35 when 11 players play just the once?

                    Why not get the perfect 11 when 11 players play twice?

                    1. RedLightning
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • Has Moderation Rights
                      • 13 Years
                      6 years, 1 month ago

                      My current plan is to have a very strong DGW34 squad containing 13 players with 2 games and play my Bench Boost then.
                      Only 2 of this squad play in GW35, so to get 11 players in GW35 I would have to replace 9 of my DGW34 players with weaker ones.
                      My GW34 squad should still contain 8 players with 2 games in DGW37, and I also have 2 free transfers in GWs 36-37 to increase this number to 10.

                      Do you seriously still think that your one extra double game player in DGW37 counts for more than your 9 weaker players in DGW34 and your inability to put your Triple Captain chip on your best double game player in DGW37?

                      1. FPL Virgin
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 7 Years
                        6 years, 1 month ago

                        We'll see.

                        8 players in your DGW34 team is 8 potential places not maximised for teams with 1 double in 34.

                        It's 8 places that you have to carry to 37 and hope nothing unexpected happens ... Like injury, loss of form or the emergence of other players.

                        If I could get 15 players with 2x15 plum games out in 34 and get 11 players with 2x11 plum fixtures plus a TC out in 37 with the same Wildcard I play in 32/33 then that's incredible. But that's going to need almost a miraculous level of planning.

                        1. TorresMagic™
                          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                          • Has Moderation Rights
                          • 14 Years
                          6 years, 1 month ago

                          15 plums = 11 duds in 35 😛

                      2. Hotdogs for Tea
                        • 8 Years
                        6 years, 1 month ago

                        Any chance you could share this squad with us ? Genuinely interested to see the mix of players & teams

                        1. Now I'm Panicking
                          • 9 Years
                          6 years, 1 month ago

                          He'll have a job without knowing the DGW fixtures or who blanks in GW35.

                          1. Hotdogs for Tea
                            • 8 Years
                            6 years, 1 month ago

                            Best case scenario that Utd, Chelsea, and Spurs go through - quite possible - but that gives the easiest WC 🙂

                        2. RedLightning
                          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                          • Has Moderation Rights
                          • 13 Years
                          6 years, 1 month ago

                          It assumes that United, Spurs, Chelsea and Southampton win through to the semi-final, that all the matches postponed from GW31 are rearranged for DGW34 and the matches postponed from GW35 will be rearranged for DGW37, but we should have this information before the deadline for GW32.
                          It currently contains Sterling, but that could change according to his fitness.
                          It is very close to my available budget, so I hope that not too many of my intended purchases get price rises before then, or perhaps that a few might even get a price fall because of their GW31 blanks.
                          It may also change according to form, injuries and rotations between now and then.

                          It currently includes players from United, Spurs, Chelsea, Leicester, City, Burnley and Swansea, who are all expected to have 2 games in GW34, as well as Salah who will be needed as captain in single game-weeks.

                          I am planning to play my wildcard in GW32, because the squad may no longer be affordable if I wait till GW33 and I also want to get rid of a number of my GW31 players.

                          Incidentally, I said earlier that it only contains 2 non-blankers for GW35. That isn't quite correct, since the players included for the sake of the DGW34 Bench Boost should also have matches in GW35, but I plan to replace most of them by cheaper enablers so that I can afford to strengthen my starting eleven when I play my Free Hit, leaving only 2 or 3 players to feature in both my wildcard squad and my Free Hit starting eleven (Salah of course being one of them).

                          1. Hotdogs for Tea
                            • 8 Years
                            6 years, 1 month ago

                            Thanks, but it is an actual 15 player BB squad I am interested in ... It’s not so easy 😉

                            1. RedLightning
                              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                              • Has Moderation Rights
                              • 13 Years
                              6 years, 1 month ago

                              Without revealing my exact squad, this is how I went about selecting it.

                              Having decided when to play my chips and assuming no cup upsets, I counted up how many matches each club were likely to have in game-weeks 32 to 38 (excluding GW35) and how difficult their fixtures were. I then chose a starting eleven that I thought was likely to score the most points in these game-weeks, including captains for both double and single game-weeks, plus 4 reasonably cheap bench players who would play twice in my Bench Boost game-week.

                              This didn't necessarily mean getting the absolute maximum number of players who play twice in DGWs, since quality counts as well as quantity.

                              This initial selection was inevitably way over budget, so I then looked for the most effective ways to reduce costs to what I could afford whilst sacrificing the smallest number of potential points, changing formation if necessary.

                              1. Hotdogs for Tea
                                • 8 Years
                                6 years, 1 month ago

                                Ok

                            2. RedLightning
                              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                              • Has Moderation Rights
                              • 13 Years
                              6 years, 1 month ago

                              This is one possibility: de Gea, Fabianski; Bavies, Alonso, Valencia, Azpilicueta, Lowton; Salah, Sterling, Mahrez, Ki, Matic; Kane, Ayew, Niasse.
                              Bottom heavy and Niasse may not play, but it's difficult to find forwards who offer good value.
                              5 premium defenders and 4 premium attackers, 8 of whom should have 2 matches in DGW34.
                              5 of the other 6 should also have 2 matches in DGW34.
                              It may not be perfect, but can you do better?

                              1. FPL Virgin
                                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                                • 7 Years
                                6 years, 1 month ago

                                This is fascinating stuff. Thanks for sharing, R.L.

                              2. Hotdogs for Tea
                                • 8 Years
                                6 years, 1 month ago

                                So you are BB in 34 with Matic, Lowton, Ayew and Niasse ? Yes, much better team available by getting 2 different teams in 34 & 37, with a WC in 33 and a FH in 37 ... or a FH in 31 and a WC in 36 🙂

                                I think Virg is in to something, you don’t actually have that many double game week players in 37 😉

                                1. RedLightning
                                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                                  • Has Moderation Rights
                                  • 13 Years
                                  6 years, 1 month ago

                                  Fabianski, Matic, Lowton, Ayew and Niasse (all of whom apart from Niasse should play twice) could get about 30 points between them in DGW34; Ki, Lowton, Ayew and possibly Niasse can be rotated for my 9th and 10th outfield positions in the other game-weeks; and Matic can be relied on for 2 or 3 points if needed.
                                  Try getting anywhere that with other players without considerably weakening the rest of your squad.
                                  Or try improving the rest of the squad without ruining your Bench Boost.

                                  Virg is stronger in DGW37, except that he can't play his Triple Captain then.
                                  I'm stronger in all the other game-weeks, especially 34 and 35, since he can't optimise either without suffering in the other.
                                  7 of my premium players should also have doubles in DGW37, I have a couple of free transfers (plus the odd hit if necessary) to bring in others, and Salah will probably outscore some of the doublers.
                                  You can't optimise them all, it's a question of getting the best overall balance - and what you gain on the swings, you lose on the roundabouts.

                                2. Hotdogs for Tea
                                  • 8 Years
                                  6 years, 1 month ago

                                  The whole point of the Virg article is about decoupling WC32 from DGW37 ... it removes the compromise and gives you 2 bespoke teams exactly when you need them 🙂

                                3. FPL Virgin
                                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                                  • 7 Years
                                  6 years, 1 month ago

                                  This basically what it took me thousands of words to say!

                                  Even Ben Crellin is currently doing 2 bespoke teams for the doubles now.

              2. Kiwivillan
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 10 Years
                6 years, 1 month ago

                The main reason FH in 31 doesn't interest me is a have 3 Liverpool attackers and the rest of the fixtures are mud

            4. Kiwivillan
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 10 Years
              6 years, 1 month ago

              ... any decisions about best use of FH after 31 can wait till later

              1. FPL Virgin
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 7 Years
                6 years, 1 month ago

                Of course. But we can still come up with some interesting strategies in the meantime. We have enough info to at least do that at this stage.

            5. Feyzi
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 9 Years
              6 years, 1 month ago

              Great article and wonderful point made; but only for those who do not have a TC...

              The sad thing is, if you have BB and TC, then you have no choice; rather dull.

              I am looking for an article that will convince me that actually you do not have to use your BB during a DGW. Just an idea that is in my thoughts. Have not spent a lot of time on it. But the above article was food for thought to Show that there are always alternatives to look out for.

            6. Hotdogs for Tea
              • 8 Years
              6 years, 1 month ago

              There is a lot of talk about a perfect WC in 32 that gives a bench boost in 34 and a great team in 37, and also this great FH team in 35 that you can get, which is the glue that makes it all work ... I have had a go at a WC team but it is very difficult to get a ‘one team fits all solution’ and I have not actually seen a WC team on here that works as people describe - you only have enough money for at most 6 premium attackers and 2 premium defenders, after that your cash is spread very thin indeed or you simply have a weak bench boost ... of course ‘you can’t have them all’ ... Maybe when we actually know in which GW the 31 fixtures will be placed, who are playing in 37 and who blanks in 35 it may be a lot clearer, but until then I doff my hat at those who are so confident of picking the perfect WC team in 32 😉

              Not sure the FA Cup semi finalists will be flogging their players in the last dgw fixture either, just days before an FA Cup sem ffinal ?

              A lot is also made about getting your original team back after a FH, but with the FH after a DGW and during the FA Cup semis, that is 3 games in 10 days for your entire squad without a transfer ... going to be interesting to see what sort of team comes back in 36, and how well it is set up for 37 doubles

              The point I am making is that we simply don’t know enough to confidently say that any strategy is better than the next - but one thing we do know is that a FH37 team, like it or not, will be a fresh as a daisy team of 11 DGW players or as close as it can possibly be 🙂

              1. Now I'm Panicking
                • 9 Years
                6 years, 1 month ago

                I think everyone is aware there are positives and negatives to all the discussed strategies. If there was a perfect strategy, we would all be playing it.

            7. pundit of punts
              • 11 Years
              6 years, 1 month ago

              I'm on board with Virgin on this one.

              Many will disagree though as they have their TC left unlike me which I think is a blessing in disguise now.

              People are mostly scared to use their TC in a SGW which is understandable but I do like Virgin's idea of TC Salah in GW 31.

              TM has been asking what would the GW 35 team look like without the FH. My plan and I have posted this before -

              GW 33 - WC
              GW 34 - BB
              GW 35 - Full XI with a hit
              GW 36 - Take a punt
              GW 37 - FH with 11 DGW players (I'll also drop Salah that gw as he'll be away to Chelsea)
              GW 38 - Take another punt.

              Now my WC would have 2 City + 2 Arsenal + 2 Swansea + 1 Burnley/West Ham + Salah. Gives me 8 BGW players with that and would get another 3 BGWers with a hit. Don't really think the FH players in BGW 35 could muster up anything more special than that.

              But, the FH in DGW 37 would mean a Alonso + Azpi + Hazard for Chelsea's 2 good home fixtures. I doubt any of the managers FHing in GW 35 could afford that on their GW 32/33 WC as they need a balanced side for BB. FH in DGW 37 means you can fill 4 bench spots with 3.9s and 4.2s.

              Still think for most not being able to play the TC in DGW 37 is the biggest put off rather than anything else.

              1. pundit of punts
                • 11 Years
                6 years, 1 month ago

                And the 3 players coming in for a hit in BGW 35 will be 1 Pool + 1 Everton + 1 Stoke who have terrific fixtures.

                Most FHing managers in GW 35 will probably have 3 Pool + 3City + 3 Arsenal + 1 Stoke/Watford + 1 Everton/West Ham.

                So, we 'd be probably down by a Monreal,Bilva and Mane. Compare that with 11 cherry picked DGW37 players and you'll have your winner. 🙂

                1. FPL Virgin
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 7 Years
                  6 years, 1 month ago

                  Thanks P.O.P. It means a lot to have someone with your profile back this strategy.

            8. Miguel Cafuquena
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 8 Years
              6 years, 1 month ago

              Hello, dear
              Someone can help me about Arsenal team..I want know why in rate may team the Arsenal team all player are in red coulor.