Moving Target

Moving Target – Mark Hughes

After parting company with Mauricio Pellegrino on Monday following last weekend’s 3-0 defeat to Newcastle United, Southampton have appointed Mark Hughes as their new manager.

The Welshman has agreed a contract until the end of the season, and takes over with Saints mired in 17th place, just one point clear of the relegation zone.

Hughes has eight matches to ensure Southampton maintain their Premier League status, and believes his fresh outlook can prove to be the difference:

“I bring experience of the Premier League. I understand what it takes in this league to win games. But first and foremost I think it’s about coming in and maybe being that different voice, that different message from myself and the staff, that will enable the players to recognise and focus on what needs to be done in this key period of the season.”

The History

After an illustrious playing career, which included a brief spell with Southampton, Hughes began his managerial career in 1999 with the Wales national team.

Five years later, Hughes took charge at Blackburn Rovers, and guided them to sixth and seventh place finishes before taking over at Manchester City in the summer of 2008.

But his time at the Etihad was short-lived, while brief spells with Fulham and Queens Park Rangers followed before being appointed Stoke City manager ahead of the 2013/14 campaign.

Hughes enjoyed three successful seasons with the Potters, producing consecutive ninth place finishes.

But after taking a step back in 2016/17, finishing 13th, Stoke endured a difficult start this season, culminating in Hughes’ departure in January following a 2-1 defeat to League Two outfit Coventry City in the FA Cup third round.

The Prospects

Having won just one of their previous 17 league matches, Southampton will hope the appointment of Hughes can prove to be the springboard to help achieve Premier League safety.

One of Saints’ main problems has been their inability to turn draws into wins. They have endured 13 stalemates this season – two more than any other side.

Resultantly, only West Bromwich Albion (three) have recorded fewer wins than Southampton, with five.

Although they’ve scored just 29 times, the St Mary’s side sit as high as eighth for shots (364) and ninth for efforts in the box (218).

Yet in terms of goal conversion, only Crystal Palace (7.4%) and West Brom (7.8%) boast worse goal conversion rates than the south coast club (8%).

The fact that Charlie Austin is their top scorer with six goals – having made just five starts due to injuries – says it all.

In recent matches, Pellegrino has persevered with club-record signing Guido Carrillo, who has yet to open his account in the Premier League since arriving from Monaco in January.

That has meant limited first-team opportunities for Manolo Gabbiadini and Shane Long. But the change in management may well mean they are both handed more of a chance to shine during the season run-in.

Encouragingly for Hughes, outwith the top six, Southampton are the best of the rest in terms of chances created this season, with 282.

In James Ward-Prowse, they have one of the best set-piece exponents in the Premier League, while Dusan Tadic, Sofiane Boufal and Nathan Redmond can all trouble opposition defences.

Tactically, one of Pellegrino’s downfalls was a lack of flexibility. He stuck rigidly with a 4-2-3-1 formation, only deciding to play with two strikers during the latter stages of matches.

Under Pellegrino, Saints were a possession-based team. They sit seventh for possession this season with an average of 53.6%.

While Hughes tends to favour a 4-2-3-1 system, he won’t shirk from trying different tactical approaches in order to get the most out of the players at his disposal.

At Stoke, he played with a 3-4-2-1 for the opening months of the campaign, before switching to a four-man defence in both 4-4-2 and 4-2-3-1 systems.

It’s interesting to note the Potters averaged just 41.5% possession under Hughes.

The Welsh boss has favoured playing with centre forwards with good pace and movement in order to thrive while playing on the counter-attack. This season, Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting and Mame Biram Diouf have mainly operated up top.

Defensively, Hughes’ record at Stoke was unconvincing. The Potters conceded 47 goals prior to the Welshman’s dismissal – seven more than any other side.

This, despite bringing in Kevin Wimmer, Bruno Martins Indi and Chelsea defender Kurt Zouma on a season-long loan last summer.

That is compounded by the Stoke defence’s improvement since Paul Lambert took charge at the bet365 Stadium.

Under Hughes, the Potters conceded an average of 2.13 goals per match.

But that has fallen to 0.85 goals with Lambert at the helm.

Significantly, Lambert has overseen a major improvement in terms big chances conceded.

They are now only giving up a big chance every 73.7 minutes, compared to one every 34.9 minutes under Hughes.

Southampton, meanwhile, have conceded 44 goals, and have managed just one clean sheet from their last nine encounters.

But until Maya Yoshida returns following a knee injury, Hughes appears to have very few options to change what has been a settled back four.

Pellegrino decided to replace goalkeeper Fraser Forster following a difficult first half of the season for the England international, with Alex McCarthy the first-choice stopper since Gameweek 21.

But Forster is another player who could benefit from the change of manager. On the downside, he’s a little more expensive in Fantasy Premier League (FPL), priced at 4.7 to McCarthy’s 4.4.

Looking at our season ticker, Southampton’s run-in is regarded as the least appealing of any side, with five of their final eight matches against top nine teams.

That hardly bodes well for a side with a single win – against West Brom – in the last 18 Gameweeks.

However, there’s a chance that Hughes’ side could have two double Gameweeks to come, which may factor into the thinking of those Wildcarding in Gameweek 32.

Their trip to Swansea is expected to drop into Gameweek 34, though this is somewhat offset by a home match with Chelsea beforehand.

Ironically, Hughes’ first match in charge could also impact on double Gameweek 37.

If Saints beat Wigan in the FA Cup this weekend – or if Leicester beat Chelsea – then their Gameweek 35 clash with the Foxes would be postponed and likely shifted to Gameweek 37, along with a trip to Everton.

An impressive display could yet bring budget options such as Jack Stephens and/or Ward-Prowse into contention.

Further Reference

Mark Hughes Wikipedia

Mark Hughes Transfer Markt Page

865 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Ronnies
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Worth a -4 ?

    alonso & stephens > pva & stanislas ?

    Tnks guys.

    1. QuintonFortune25
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Yeah

  2. QuintonFortune25
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Who's more likely to start for Liverpool, Lovren or Matip?

      1. QuintonFortune25
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Cheers TM

  3. StoichkovFPL
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    It would be so nice if managers say what lineup they gonna play at the pressers....Dreams...

  4. I Have No Idea What I'…
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Would you make any changes to my free hit side?

    -----------------------Butland---------------------
    ----Zanka--------Hadergjonaj-----Schindler--
    Stanislas-----Salah-----Shaqiri-----Mane--
    --------Wilson------Firmino------King------

    Bench: Foster, Zaha, Van Annholt, Baines

    £7.3M in the bank

    1. _figu
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      I like the approach on FH. I'd rather triple Stoke. Maybe double Stoke and double Hudde? Idk just a thought. I feel like Palace scoring.

    2. Blame it on Traore
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Triple Hudds defence seems very excessive to me. I'd start PVA and Baines alongside Schindler.

  5. GW31 Odds/Stats
    G-Whizz
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    GW31 DS Stats, Clean Sheet and Fixture Odds.

    Last week saw Manchester City (571DS) beat Stoke 2-0, Chelsea (517DS) beat Crystal Palace 2-1 and finally Arsenal who stole onto the radar with their DS of 334 beat Watford 3-0.

    Last week's stats can be found here:
    https://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/comment/17773779

    GW31 DS stats:
    BOU: WBA 221
    CPL: hud -121
    EVE: stk 28
    HUD: CPL 121
    LIV: WAT 447
    STK: EVE -28
    WAT: liv -447
    WBA: bou -221
    (Doosra gives a more detailed explanation of these numbers here http://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/comment/16458109)

    No suprise to see Liverpool (447DS) come out on top with their game at Anfield against Watford.

    GW31 Fixture Odds can be found here:
    http://prntscr.com/irsda1
    (Provided by Betfair.com)

    Clean sheet odds: Implied chance of a clean sheet
    LIV 1.83 55%
    BOU 2.50 40%
    HUD 2.80 36%
    STO 2.80 36%
    CPL 2.87 35%
    EVE 3.40 29%
    WBA 4.0 25%
    WAT 13.0 8%
    (Provided by Betfair.com)

    I'm gonna go with only 7 players this week (-4). Good luck everyone, hope it goes well for you!

    G

    1. StoichkovFPL
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      cheers!

    2. StoichkovFPL
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      BOU: WBA 221 ; HUD: CPL 121

      so King over Mounie?

      1. G-Whizz
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        I don't take much notice of anything with a DS under 350 tbh...

    3. FPL Pillars
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Solid work. VVD Goal and CS would be nice 🙂

      1. G-Whizz
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        I'd be happy with a CS tbh!

    4. panda07
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Cheers mate, always find this useful.

      1. G-Whizz
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Thanks mate!

    5. STEP rOVERS
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Top man! Thanks

      1. G-Whizz
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        You're welcome!

    6. The Overthinker
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      So bringing in Coleman for a hit isn't worth it?

      1. G-Whizz
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        I'm only fielding 7 for 31 (-4) so it's up to you...

        1. The Overthinker
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          I am on 7 too. Have a ft so don't exactly know what should be done.

          Anyways Thanks G

          1. G-Whizz
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 6 Years
            6 years, 1 month ago

            Taking a hit to field 9 might work out but in all honesty I really don't envy your decision tbh...

    7. Dazzler365
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Cheers G. Helpful as always

      1. G-Whizz
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        You're welcome! 🙂

    8. Bushman
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Interesting that Stoke are more likely to keep a CS than Eve despite Eve being favourites to win (albeit only just). Cheers!

      1. G-Whizz
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Think that shows it could go either way or that rhe Bookies ain't got a Scooby lol

  6. Coaly
    • 11 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Stanislas or Shaq - both would be -4?

    1. GE
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Stanislas

    2. _figu
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      both

    3. Blame it on Traore
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      I'd probably get them both

    4. FPL Pillars
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Get Stan avoid shaqiri

  7. @FPL_liverbird (liverpoolfa…
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Need some surgery help debating hits or not with 2FT:
    Current:
    Pickford
    VVD,Alonso,Ogbonna
    Salah,Shaqiri,KDB,Walcott,Mane
    Wilson,Depoite

    A) Alonso+KDB > Baines+Stanislas (10players)
    B) Alonso+KDB+Depoitre > Baines+Stanislas+King -4(10Players)
    C) Alonso+Kane > Baines+Mounie (10players)
    D) Something else

    1. GE
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      A

      1. @FPL_liverbird (liverpoolfa…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Ive been convinced on B all week but its not smart

    2. Klaren
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      D) Kane + KDB -> Stanislas + Mounie

      1. @FPL_liverbird (liverpoolfa…
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Cant formation restrictions

        1. Klaren
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          Haha sorry didn't realise, A then

  8. GE
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    1) Sterling and B.Silva-> Stanislas and Shaqiri
    2) Kane and Sterling/B.Silva -> King and Stanislas (also avoiding losing money on Kane)

    (Have Wilson)

    1. Prøfeßör …
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      I think A.

    2. _figu
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      A

    3. Blame it on Traore
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      A

    4. @FPL_liverbird (liverpoolfa…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      2 - I like the idea of triple Bou

  9. Prøfeßör …
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Which players do you think are flying under the radar for this BGW?

    1. _figu
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      A. Smith but is he nailed? Outside of ffs I would assume there is not going to be many Zaha/PVA owners. Maybe even King. Casuals likely looking at total point and going Wilson over King (not saying it's wrong)

  10. Bruno Bruno!!
    • 8 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Here is Paul Mersons predictions for the 4 premier league game

    Liverpool (3) - Watford (0)

    Stoke (2) - Everton (0)

    Bournemouth (2) - WestBrom (0)

    Huddersfield (1) - Crystal Palace (2)

    1. FPL Pillars
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      At least he got one right

    2. Krafty Werks
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      3-0
      2-1
      3-1
      1-2

    3. Klaren
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      All seem right other than Huddersfield - Crystal Palace (draw)

    4. @FPL_liverbird (liverpoolfa…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      2-0
      0-1
      3-1
      1-1

  11. The King
    • 10 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Good week to use free chip?

    Have all remaining chips anencephaly leading in ML

    1. The King
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      And* lol

      1. John t penguin
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 1 month ago

        Well I learnt a new word

        1. The King
          • 10 Years
          6 years, 1 month ago

          me too haha

  12. No Luck
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Looking to fit the last few pieces of the jigsaw.

    1. Kane -> Benteke/King/Wilson?
    2. Hazard -> Zaha/Stanislas/Shaq?
    3. Is any of the above or Baines/Pickford/Begovic worth a -4?

    Currently thinking King, Stanislas and no hit:
    -
    VVD, Martina, Francis,
    Salah, Walcott, Stanislas,
    Firmino, King, Quaner.

    1. Nomar
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      1) Benteke
      2) Stanislas

  13. ZimZalabim
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Player Mins Goals assists Bonus TP
    Zaha 1831 4 4 0 76
    Stan 1150 4 3 4 64
    King 1801 4 3 5 72
    Mounie 1365 6 2 11 75
    Wilson 1474 7 2 10 81 (blanked last 5 games)

    very shocked to see Zaha hasn't had any bonus at all this season.

    Stan and Mounie look statistically better than Zaha and King but for some reason Í'm still not convinced . Can someone help convince me which duo is the better pick for this week ?

    1. Toblerone52 - Zlatan Ibra-H…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      I'm going zaha and king or wilson

    2. Toblerone52 - Zlatan Ibra-H…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Mounie had like 8 shots against Swansea and didn't score...

    3. No Luck
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      I'm leaning towards Stan and King but Zaha could be inspired, he always looks like he could score a brace or more but just never quite happened yet.

  14. Gooner97
    • 10 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Chances for Kenny to play?

    1. _figu
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      4.20%

    2. No Luck
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      0 or as close to it as you can reasonably get

  15. FPLShaqiri
    • 6 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Stanislas best mid for next 2 GW's?

    I own Salah, Shaq, Richarlison and Mahrez.
    Wildcard in 33

    1. Nomar
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Yeah.

  16. Ruth_NZ
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Amidst the Kane comments it appears to have been mostly overlooked that TV has become significantly less important as a result of his injury.

    TV only matters when budget is stretched, meaning when there are many premium players you want. The loss of the most expensive player in the game really reduces that pressure, especially when the 2nd and 3rd most expensive players aren't particularly attractive right now either.

    My opinion is that Kane probably won't be needed for FPL till GW36 assuming Spurs reach the FAC SF. If so that favours the GW34 BB especially. The extra cash can be used on a 'thicker' bench for that week. And those that intend to wildcard late (GW36) can probably get close to an optimal use of budget over the remaining weeks. Of course they will lose the potential of a longer-term strategic benefit from the wildcard that way but those that have planned GW34BB GW35FH GW36Wildcard GW37TC must be feeling pretty happy right now. 🙂

    1. Deulofail
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Wrong article 🙂

    2. andy85wsm
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Yup!

      Think I'm setting up my wildcard team without giving too much thought to how to get Kane back until we know a lot more. Until then funds will be spread.

  17. IRBOX ⚽
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Surely it’s peonounced StanisLASS and not StanisLOUSE. Doing my head in Sutherns!

    1. IRBOX ⚽
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 1 month ago

      Pronounced* even

  18. For Fuchs Sake
    • 14 Years
    6 years, 1 month ago

    Used all my transfers, but thinking of doing -4 or -8, any obvious changes, thinking of Shaqiri and Baines in?

    Playing:
    Lossi
    Salah Mane Sterling
    Mounie Firnino Wilson

    Not playing:
    Adrian Davies Alonso Chilwell
    Naughton Ogbonna Chou-Mot Son