Fixtures
19 December 2018 877 comments
DavidMunday815 DavidMunday815
Share:

We could potentially see fewer clean sheets than usual over the upcoming Christmas period this season.

That’s because Premier League defences have generally been operating at a lower level in 2018/19.

Also, the recent Gameweek 15 action actually saw all 20 top-flight teams concede at least once, not a single one keeping a clean sheet, with rotation rife for several of them.

With changes in personnel commonplace in the later winter months, we decided to look back on the last three Premier League Christmases to see if defensive potential usually took a hit at this time of year.

We found that in the 2015/16, 2016/17 and 2017/18 campaigns, the tight turnaround between matches and increased rotation didn’t always affect clean sheets.

However, with the 2018/19 campaign, there has already been a marked drop-off of shut-outs in the month of December compared to previous months.

2018/19

Season

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Max. no. of clean sheets

340

60

80

60

60

80

Clean sheets secured

90

16

22

22

15

16

Percentages

26.47%

26.67%

27.50%

36.67%

25.00%

20.00%

As you can see from the table above, December has seen the lowest percentage of clean sheets than any month this season.

From a possible 80 across four Gameweeks, just 16 have been recorded, equivalent to 20%.

That is below the season average of 26.47% from a possible 340, and 5% lower than the next worst, November.

So far, October has been the best month for clean sheets, with 36.67% of a possible 60 being secured.

Interestingly, this was the month with the joint-fewest number of Gameweeks played in it. Thanks to international breaks either side of it, there were just three matches for each Premier League club, suggesting that the increased rest period (for some anyway) aided preparation, fitness and concentration levels to the point that clean sheets were more likely to be secured.

Obviously, there were also three Gameweeks in August and just 26.67% of the maximum number of clean sheets were secured. However, it could be argued that at that stage of the season opponents are harder to research for strong and weak points, making preparing for a clean sheet harder to achieve.

Either way, December has seen the fastest turnaround between Premier League matches, as well as Champions League, Europa League and League Cup commitments for some clubs, so it should be no surprise to see defences suffering as a result.

While this certainly suggests that factoring clean sheets into our Christmas transfer plans could be difficult this year, history tells us that the festive period is not always so lacking in shutouts.

In two of the last three seasons, December has actually been one of the better months for clean sheets, while the 2016/17 season saw Premier League teams make improvements in that month.

2015/16

Season

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Max. no. of clean sheets

760

80

60

80

60

100

Clean sheets secured

217

26

15

23

16

33

Percentages

28.55%

32.50%

25.00%

28.75%

26.67%

33.00%

* Three matches of Gameweek 11 played in November.

In 2015/16, after clean sheets were recorded at a rate of 28% between August and November, this jumped up massively to 33% in the final month of 2015.

This total was also higher than the final percentage for the campaign as a whole.

2017/18

Season

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Max. no. of clean sheets

760

60

80

60

80

140

Clean sheets secured

226

24

31

14

24

43

Percentages

29.74%

40.00%

38.75%

23.33%

30.00%

30.71%

* Gameweek 7 is considered entirely as a September Gameweek, despite three matches taking place in October, just for the ease of the research.

The same was true last year, although not to the same extent. 29.74% of a possible 760 clean sheets were recorded in the 2017/18 campaign, with December’s rate just above that at 30.71%.

Admittedly, that was still below the average up until that point. Between August and November, 33.02% of a possible 280 clean sheets were secured, somewhat more than the 30.71% from 140 in December.

That shouldn’t surprise us considering that Premier League teams had to play half the number of matches they had played between August and November in the space of just 31 days. The 2017/18 Christmas period truly was brutal for all involved.

It is possible that the clubs struggled to recover from such an intense winter period because, after a strong start of close to 40% of clean sheets secured in August and September, the rate for the season as a whole was just 29.74%.

2016/17

Season

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Max. no. of clean sheets

760

60

60

80

60

120

Clean sheets secured

214

14

11

27

10

31

Percentages

28.16%

23.33%

18.33%

33.75%

16.67%

25.83%

* Gameweek 7 was considered an October Gameweek as one match was played on September 30, but all nine others were played in the month of October.
** One match of Gameweek 19 played on January 1.

Interestingly, the 2016/17 season saw December as a month of improvement for defensive returns compared to the earlier weeks of the campaign.

Between August and September of 2016, 23.02% of a possible 260 clean sheets were secured.

However, December saw 25.83% of a possible 120 shutouts achieved.

Despite that, it was still below the average for the season, which stood at 28.16% from a possible 760 come May 2017.

Conclusion

As you can see by comparing the current clean sheet success rate in the Premier League with previous season averages, there is has been deterioration.

Combining 2015/16, 2016/17 and 2017/18 we saw that 28.82% of a possible 2,280 clean sheets were secured.

After 17 Gameweeks of 2018/19, just 26.47% have been achieved, and that’s before we embark on the Christmas fixtures at the end of December.

While it is not always a month devoid of clean sheets, in each of the last three campaigns it was either below the overall season average or lower than the rate recorded up until that point.

All things considered, it does seem that defensive returns could come at a premium over the next cluster of Gameweeks.

More importantly, it could be our premium defensive assets who end up suffering as a result.

The appeal of defenders priced between £5.5m and £7.0m is usually a combination of attacking and defensive potential, so when one of those is removed, the value begins to drop.

Already, Marcos Alonso (£7.0m) is losing his support while ownership of even Manchester City and Liverpool defenders is on the wane.

Fantasy managers are presented with helpful alternative strategies though, as the premium defender tactic seems to have reached its end.

We could see more managers, especially those with Wildcards to wield, make the switch to goalkeepers more suited to save points than clean sheets, such as Lukasz Fabianski (£4.6m), Joe Hart (£4.5m) and Mat Ryan (£4.5m). Coincidentally, all three of those actually have appealing fixtures between now and the new year.

We also have a multitude of budget defenders who offer attacking threat like Matt Doherty (£5.1m) and Lucas Digne (£4.8m) as well as incredibly cheap starters such as Aaron Wan-Bissaka (£4.3m) and Ryan Bennett (£4.2m). With those last two, losing a clean sheet puts significantly less pressure on their role in our teams.

Meanwhile, the money seems to be shifting further up the pitch once again, giving Fantasy managers plenty of places to allocate funds outside of defence.

In fact, they are virtually compelled to spend bigger in midfield and up front with players such as Eden Hazard (£11.0m), Raheem Sterling (£11.6m), Harry Kane (£12.6m) and Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang (£11.5m) all demanding our attention.

So with clean sheets potentially less frequent over the next block of fixtures, it certainly makes sense to move our money from the players who will suffer as a result of this, to the players capitalising on it.

Become a Member and access our data

Memberships for the 2018/19 campaign are now available for the price of just £15.

Join now to get the following:

  • Plot your transfer strategies using the fully interactive Season Ticker.
  • Get projections for every Premier League player provided by the Rate My Team statistical model.
  • Use Rate My Team throughout the season to guide your selections and transfers.
  • Get access to over 130+ exclusive members articles over the season.
  • Analyse our OPTA-powered statistic tables specifically tailored for Fantasy Football Managers.
  • Use our exclusive tool to build custom stats tables from over 100 OPTA player and team stats.
  • View heatmaps and expected goals data for every player.
  • Use our powerful comparison tool to analyse players head-to-head.

CLICK HERE TO BECOME A FANTASY FOOTBALL SCOUT MEMBER

877 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Dacra
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Kola, Haz, Wilson flagged.

    Be fit, damn you.

    1. caldracula
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Wouldn't be worried about Haz

    2. WVA
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Wilson?

  2. George James
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Predicted minutes this gameweek?

    A) Kolasinac
    B) Lacazette
    C) Son
    D) KDB

    1. Amey
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Don't Know
      45 😛
      30
      23

    2. caldracula
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      90
      45
      60
      30

    3. ZeBestee
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Wait for tonight's fix and ask the question after

      1. Guba
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        this

  3. Albert_Luque
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Who would you rather have for the Xmas Period (at least):

    A) Kane or B) Auba
    1) Haz or 2) Sane

    1. Amey
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Kane
      Hazard is season keeper for me.
      But I have Sane and definitely keeping him until Mendy is fit.

    2. caldracula
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Kane
      Haz & Sane/Sterling

    3. fattfattygavgav
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      B1

    4. Guba
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I think you want 3 of those 4 in reality.

      A1+2. Hazard I'll have for the whole season but I would say Sane is currently marginally the more attractive of the two (all things considered including price).

    5. Albert_Luque
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Cheers all. Already have Sterling, and trying to rebalance my side by getting rid of one of my premiums (Kane and Auba) and replacing Kenedy with either Sane or Hazard.

      Essentially its Kane and Sane or Hazard/Sane and Auba, proving a difficult choice but leaning towards getting rid of Kane.

  4. Flynny
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Hi...would be great to get some advice on what to do here please. 1ft. 0.1itb

    I'd like hazard - but can't do that easily. Don't want to lose richarlison given the fixtures

    Also concerned if auba starts tonight he may be rotated at weekend

    Fab 4m
    Alonso Doherty schindler awb vinagre
    Sterling sane richi Anderson camarasa
    Kane auba Jimenez

    One option is simply vinagre to cheapo like yoshida / cedric

    Is alonso camarasa and auba to laportte hazard and ings - 8 worth a go or crazy...would love to 352

    Thanks!

    1. Christina.
      • 16 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Similar to my lot Flynny. Salah or Haz in for me after selling Auba. not this week though

      Fab
      Alonso TAA* Doherty
      Sterling Sane Rich Snodgrass Rich
      Kane Jim Auba

      Wanna B

      1.6 ITB
      2 FT's

      1. Christina.
        • 16 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Sorry, lose the one Rich.

      2. Tempestic
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        2 richarlisons?

    2. Amey
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Save this week & do those transfers next week for -4.
      Take last points from Auba 😛

    3. Guba
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I think A outscores B with the -8. I would hold personally, only if Auba played the full 90 tonight would I be contemplating moves.

      I wouldn't rip apart my team to get Hazard against Leicester, Auba against Burnley is nice.

      1. Flynny
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Thanks all

        I guess the key is how much time auba gets tonight....if he plays the majority , he must be quite likely to get rested v Burnley I think

        Cheers all!

  5. barton fc
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    patricio (hamer)
    alonso robbo kola (doherty, AWB)
    salah sterling richarlison brooks (punchen)
    aubba wilson jimenez

    bank the transfer or salah to sane?

    1. Amey
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Brooks to Snoddy
      OR
      Save the FT

      1. barton fc
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        long to play is to sell salah and upgrade brooks so dont really want to sell him also im pretty sure he will start after his rest

        1. Amey
          • 7 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          Save then

          1. barton fc
            • 8 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            chears

  6. amplifiedAnt
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Ederson (Hamer)
    Alonso, Robertson, Doherty (Digne, AWB)
    Sterling, Hazard, Richarlison, Snodgrass (Fraser)
    Kane, Chicharito, Jiminez

    1FT, 0.1 ITB. WC remaining.

    GTG and save?

    1. Amey
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Absolutely
      Good team

    2. Fasya
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Good team

    3. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Richarlison to Anderson possible? could be a decent 2 week punt

      1. amplifiedAnt
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Bought cheaply, so too much of a gap in funds.

    4. Bouncebackability
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Would play Fraser over Jiminez and arguably Digne over Doherty.

      1. amplifiedAnt
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Sure - order provisional and TBC.

      2. Guba
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        I'd also do both of the above

    5. CRO KLOPP
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Maybe Digne instead of Doherty

    6. BigBillyBass
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Probably the best team I've seen on here in a long time

      1. amplifiedAnt
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Up to 12k OR, so it is doing me proud!

  7. FCSB
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    What to do here please:

    Fabianski
    TAA Doherty Schindler
    Sterling Son Fraser Anderson
    Kane Aubameyang Wilson

    Hamer Richarlison Dunk AWB

    2 FT, 0.1 ITB

    What to do here???

    Thanks

    1. fattfattygavgav
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I'd get rid of at least one of Fraser and Wilson. Possibly next GW though.

  8. Ser Davos
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Fabianski
    Alonso | Robertson | Digne
    Sterling | Hazard | Anderson | Richarlison | Sigurdsson
    Auba | Wilson

    Doherty | Success | AWB

    Content with this build and setup, but really would like a route to Sane. Any thoughts?

    1. MASTER ROSHI
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Maybe Alonso and Siggy > Sane and 5.0 DEF

      1. Amey
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        This

        1. Ser Davos
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          Cheers both, shall ponder it

  9. Bavarian
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Fabianski-Patricio
    Alonso-Robertson-Laporte-Doherty-WB
    Salah-Sane-Fraser-Richarlison-Hojbjerg
    Aubameyang-Jimenez-Chicharito

    2FT and 1.1 ITB

    1-Hojbjerg > Snodgras
    2-Patricio-Fraser >> Button/Steele-FAnderson
    3-Patricio-Auba >> Button/Steele-Kane
    4-Save
    4-Other suggestions

    1. LSK
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      2

    2. Amey
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      2
      OR
      Alonso+Laporte+Fraser >> Hazard+Digne+Lowe

  10. FCSB
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Son & Fraser >> Sane & 4.8 ??

    [have Sterling]

    Thanks

    1. LSK
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      If the 4.8 is benched

      1. FCSB
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        yes, would be my 5th mid

        sterling sane richarlison anderson 4.8

        1. LSK
          • 8 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          Yeah that’s a better midfield imo. But would get in a playing 4.4. Never know when you’ll be .1 or .2 off your ideal next move

          1. FCSB
            • 10 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            thanks mate, any suggestions?

    2. jbenny1107
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Wait to see if Son starts today. He can match Sane and Fraser has a good home fixture this week. Otherwise, Camarasa

  11. madame shelly
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Rmwct please

    Fab, button

    Alonso, Robbo, lovren, Doherty, digne

    Sterling, sane, hazard, Anderson, richarlison

    Jimmy, Ings, Wilson

    0.8m itb think it covers a bit of Xmas rotation

    1. Christina.
      • 16 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      good luck

    2. Bavarian
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Benching headache every week

    3. Amey
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Great team !

    4. pollz
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Seems a very strong team and bench, I like it.

    5. LSK
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Funds too spread out imo. A good bench can be useless and frustrating because few players are rested for the full 90.

      1. madame shelly
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Sterling often is
        I get it, but I think they're all strong players. In Jan, I'll move to a lesser quality bench

    6. Guba
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I really like all of it with one exception though for me in I feel AWB is a season keeper, a playing 4.0M defender that is also pretty good is so nice for freeing up cash.

      Personally I'd change Lovren for AWB to allow you cash to play with such as changing Igns/Jiminez to a 7M forward like Arnie, Mitro etc later on. (assuming you had AWB at 4.0m?)

      However Lovren will very likely outscore AWB this week so would mean playing Digne probably instead.

      1. madame shelly
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Good point, and did toy with that, could also upgrade to a spurs df

    7. jbenny1107
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Solid for December. Wish I had my wildcard, I’d pick the same team.

      1. madame shelly
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        And here am I dithering over hitting the confirm as my team this week is ok. only ok tho (can't ditch auba)

  12. BigBillyBass
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Need some advice guys. Had a pretty poor December so far and need to put a few points back on the board. What would you do with this team?

    Patricio (Hamer)
    Robbo Alonso Laporte (Doherty AWB)
    Sterling Sane Richarlison FAnderson (Neves)
    Kane Wilson Rondon

    1. Christina.
      • 16 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Lose:
      -Neves
      -Rondon

      1. George James
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Blimey, dont lose Rondon this week

    2. The 5% Team
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Sounds boring, but Pat to Fabianski

    3. -GK22-
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      1. Hazard
      2. Arsenal coverage
      3. Lose Alonso and maybe Kane
      4. Get Fabianksi

  13. Cheshire Duck
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Is Button or Steele Brighton's second goalkeeper ?

    1. dunas_dog
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Not clear. Steele been on bench last few games but Button now fit again

  14. -GK22-
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Bench fodder change for Xmas period

    1. Kayal to either
    A) camarasa
    B) masuaku
    C) Quina

    Or

    2. Success to either
    A) long
    B) Kamara

    1. Ha.
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      1A

    2. fattfattygavgav
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      reply fail,

      1A

  15. pollz
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Would you swap Mitrovic out for Rashford? I got 1-FT, and looking to potentially ride the Manchester United plausible updrift.

    Mitro also has fantastic fixtures, but close to suspension. Playing his former team Newcastle, I could well see him scoring. On the other hand I have been telling myself for ages that he "could" score the next game, but the points don`t come.

    Thoughts?

    1. dunas_dog
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      No I would play Mitro and have 2 transfers next game week

      1. pollz
        • 13 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Thank you.

  16. barton fc
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    any thing to worry about with wilson?

    1. Amey
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Nothing this gw.
      But should be worried about upcoming fixtures IMO;)

  17. Weilong7
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Lloris Hamer
    Luiz Robertson Laporte Dunk AWB
    Hazard Salah Richarlison Anderson Stephens
    Aubameyang Jimenez Kamara

    1 FT 0.8 ITB

    Any suggestions/advice? Thanks!

  18. fattfattygavgav
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    1A

  19. Micahrichard
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Should I play Doherty or Digne this GW?

    1. CRO KLOPP
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Digne

    2. Guba
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I'm going Digne.

    3. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Both very likely to blank, but Digne probably.

  20. CRO KLOPP
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    1ft 0.1 itb
    Ryan
    Alonso TAA Digne
    Hazard Sane Richarlison Anderson
    Kane Auba Jimenez
    Hamer Doherty Hojbjerg AWB

    A) TAA to balbuena
    B) Ryan to Fabianski
    C) Kane and Hojbjerg to Kamara and Sterling for a hit
    D) something else/save

  21. Christina.
    • 16 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    I honestly think people over overly worried about benches and rotation over the Xmas period.

    Now(well the the last couple of weeks) is the time to get onto Sane, Digne and Snodgrass. Low ownership, in form, stats, good fixtures. Forget about upgrading Peltier to Schindler.

    1. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      true that and its not like auto-sub player brings mega haul, majority of the time they get 1-3pts when we need them... 😮

      1. Christina.
        • 16 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        plus few of these players will get 0 mins in a game. Look at Sane...52 & 65 mins in last 2. Sterling 24mins in last game.

      2. Amey
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Yeah.
        Kamara scored 8 & 5 when he was on bench & scored 2 when je was playing last week 😮

      3. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        My bench players only get hauls when they aren't auto-subbed in 🙁

      4. Guba
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        I've just posted this below but also in response to this I think you're looking at from a single game week perspective, bench points accumulate over the season and it adds up. Lets say you get 2 subs on at 2 points each, that's a 4 point gain initially but that only has to happen a few times to mean fairly reasonable change in rank. There will be times when your bench score points too.

        1. Holmes
          • 12 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          Just calculated and I have got only 16pts from auto-sub 😮

          Having a decent bench is good but too much focus on it isnt required. Likes of Wan Bissaka, Bennett, 4.5m mid etc will do the job but spending extra cash and using FTs to improve bench probably isnt worth it.

    2. Amey
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Best advice to give !

    3. LSK
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I agree. Even when players are benched they mostly come on for a cameo anyway so your subs are useless. And it would be a massive coincidence if the one week you use your 3rd sub, the player who you’ve deemed least likely to score points, they actually perform. And all that extra money on the bench will block the transfers you need to be making.

      1. Guba
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        In GW15 literally all 3 of my subs came on - giving me 15 points. That is huge.
        Also you're looking at from a single game week perspective, bench points accumulate over the season and it can be quite considerable.

        1. LSK
          • 8 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          I think people remember times like that but they don’t remember that if they’d spent 2 million less then their first 11 would be better and their total score would be higher, even taken into account those 15 points.

          1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
            • 11 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            Or, there is no right or wrong answer and there's more than one way to skin a cat 🙂

            1. LSK
              • 8 Years
              7 years, 3 months ago

              True, just giving my opinion on it.

              1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
                • 11 Years
                7 years, 3 months ago

                Absolutely - everyone plays the game differently. Some take lots of hits, some take no hits, for example. Just do what you are comfortable with.

          2. Guba
            • 10 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            The players that were benched that week were 'premium' options in Sterling and Robertson so this isn't really true. More cash would be irrelevant as these players still wouldn't have played.

            15 points in a single week is massive. Now add this up over the season and it makes a massive difference. I'm not saying buy an expensive bench, I'm saying use the available cheap options such as AWB, Bennet etc to ensure you have a playing bench.

            1. Christina.
              • 16 Years
              7 years, 3 months ago

              Yep, that makes sense. But not benching players like Richarlison last week. People got lucky as he should have scored 2 away vs City.

              1. Christina.
                • 16 Years
                7 years, 3 months ago

                Same with Ings owners(Hello Triggerlips) and Dinge owners who got stuck with pts on their bench last week.

                1. Guba
                  • 10 Years
                  7 years, 3 months ago

                  Yes but my point is that the bench is important to be playing. Doesn't need to be expensive, but simply playing because they will be needed not just over xmas but over the season. There are enough options available to us.

                  I benched Digne too but I'm perfectly happy see him get an assist.

                  1. Christina.
                    • 16 Years
                    7 years, 3 months ago

                    I agree, but I'm assuming most benches are cheap and playing...perhaps the 5th df as fodder.

                    Your case with a 15 pt auto sub is extreme. Who would have thought Chelsea would lose to Wolves?

                    You had Jim and Doherty subbed in. I played both from the start.

                    1. Guba
                      • 10 Years
                      7 years, 3 months ago

                      It is extreme but obviously does happen. Small increments do also add up.

                      I'm more just debating the original comment, I'd agree that is very much situational overall on the individuals team. I was disagreeing though in that I do think rotation is important to consider over xmas.

                      1. Christina.
                        • 16 Years
                        7 years, 3 months ago

                        It might be important to consider yes, but getting/guessing it right is tough. I would not avoid players like Sane/Sterling because my funds are spread around my team on players like Ings over Kamara or a 2nd keeper or even Anderson over Snoddy just in case I need my bench.

            2. LSK
              • 8 Years
              7 years, 3 months ago

              I understand and I have AWB, Doherty and Kamara on my bench this week so not too bad but I think when Rich, Jiménez etc are being benched frequently then there’s an issue. To my point saving on my bench has allowed Robertson instead of TAA. Robertson didn’t play that week but overall he’s more than made up those 15 points. There’s no right or wrong, I just think too much emphasis is being put on bench players.

              1. Guba
                • 10 Years
                7 years, 3 months ago

                But you're talking now about a completely separate point. I'm not saying to buy an expensive bench but ensure that its playing which is important over xmas.

                Looking at your bench, you've done the same thing so it is playing. If you had 3 non-playing bench players then I imagine you would see this a an issue, no? So the statement at the top is therefore incorrect, changing Peltier is definitely a viable route.

                1. LSK
                  • 8 Years
                  7 years, 3 months ago

                  Yep, if you have 3 non playing players, you’re in trouble but if you have 2 players subs and Peltier, I agree with the op that Peltier is not the priority. I guess like everything it depends on your individual team and individual circumstances. I brought in Snodgrass for Obiang so I’m not advocating a non-playing bench at all.

    4. Guba
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I diagree in that I think the bench will be important over Xmas.
      It depends though on the individual team, if you have lots of gaping issues then yeah that would obviously be a priority.

    5. fenixri
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      3rd sub should be always fodder.

      1. Guba
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        When you have two playing 4.0M defenders (before price rises) in AWB and Bennet, there's absolutely no reason why the third sub should be fodder.

    6. CRO KLOPP
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I agree, only with a good bench you have flexibility to save ft, it's not all about autosubs

    7. HNI
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      I upgraded Peltier to Holebas last gw. Good back up for doherty toughies

      1. Christina.
        • 16 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Well played.
        Excellent rank.

    8. WVA
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Son has turned out to be very concerning though!?

  22. Winter_is_coming
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Crazy to think about Sterling and Kamara in for Auba and Camarassa for -8 with this team?

    Fab (Hamer)
    Alonso - Schindler - Digne (AWB, Boly)
    Hazard - Sane (c) - FAnderson - Richarlison (Camarassa)
    Kane - Auba - Jimenez

    1. Pierce34
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Yes. You think the most likely thing is that Sterling will outscore Aubameyang by 9 points or more?

      1. Winter_is_coming
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Different calculate because will captain Sterling.

        1. Pierce34
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          Still, it's a very low percentage play. Sometimes it will work but most of the times it won't.

          1. Winter_is_coming
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 12 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            Agree, it`s even can end bad if Auba benched and score from 20 minutes on the pitch.

            1. Pierce34
              • 10 Years
              7 years, 3 months ago

              I think I'd only consider it if Aubameyang plays 90 minutes tonight, which I think is very unlikely.

              1. Winter_is_coming
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 12 Years
                7 years, 3 months ago

                That was my initial plan - if Auba playing from the start - drop for Sterling.
                If benched - def not worth a risk.
                Right now think, that even if Auba rested vs Burnley, he will play next 3 in festive period and can have a good score there.

    2. fenixri
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Why would you do it for -8?

      Auba has good fixture and you have cover in Sane which imo is in better form atm.

      Crazy

      1. Winter_is_coming
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        If Auba rested today - no questions.
        If not, think he can be vs Burnley, while Sterling have 10+ score.

  23. -GK22-
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Lost patience with siggy and want to upgrade success. Want snoddy for WHU mid double up with Fanderson so

    Siggy & Success to snoddy and who for -4?

    A) jimmy
    B) rondo
    C) Austin
    D) ings
    E)

    1. Winter_is_coming
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Buy Jimenez despite Liv fixture and forget about this position for 7-14 gameweeks.

  24. DeathoftheParty
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    We all pretty confident Kane will be fit for the weekend?

    1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      He better be!!!

      1. DeathoftheParty
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        I've not been well this week. But it's our Christmas do tomorrow...

        Ok there won't be a big haul... But I'll be puttin a shift in.

    2. CRO KLOPP
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Fit to play yes
      Not so confident on a mega haul

    3. King Kohli
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Yes

    4. Winter_is_coming
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      As an owner I`m even think if he won`t play vs Everton its better, because he will play 3 other easier fixtures.
      But, it`s speculation, he will play vs Everton, maximum is rest today.

  25. L'Aeroplanino
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    ask again after City game last night:

    If Son plays 70+ tonight, Salah Son (-4) -> Sterling Sane?

    1. L'Aeroplanino
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      no other spurs asset

    2. Pierce34
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Possibly. I might do something similar if Son gets close to 90 minutes.

      1. Pieterke30
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        I think he will.

        I personally have to decide who to get rid of between Son and Kane. The first one will play close to 90 mins tonight and be a major rotation risk for Everton game, and I will have doubts abt the fitness of the other one until after the weekend. Not to mention I wasnt convinced he would be worth that much money when I brought him in, and obvs still not convinced he is.

        In short, I would like Son to be nailed on.

        1. Pierce34
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          I love Son as a player - and I'm glad I got him before his 14 point haul 2 weeks ago. But yes, he may have to go if he plays a lot of minutes tonight.

          1. Pierce34
            • 10 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            I can get Sané for him for free so I don't even have to take a risk.

          2. Pieterke30
            • 9 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            For me, Kane might have to go soon too. I think I will give him until the Bournemouth game (included) to prove his worth.

        2. Captain Kakaroto (I blame R…
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          This is exactly my problem. Dunno IF Kane worse it and have Son also. will wait till after todays game.

    3. Smurf
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Why not wait until after tonight’s game?

    4. Winter_is_coming
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Andy possibly will do the same for -8 with Hazard and Sterling.
      I don`t like the idea of dropping Salah before Wol and Newcastle.
      Try to choose who you want more from Sterling and Sane, drop Son and find money elsewhere.

    5. L'Aeroplanino
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      cheers all

    6. Guba
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      If Son played 70+ minutes tonight then yes I would personally make those moves.

  26. fenixri
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Why is Hazard flagged?

    1. Stat Sloth
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      He broke his leg and will be out for a couple of months.

    2. CRO KLOPP
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Is this a riddle?

    3. DeathoftheParty
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Broke a toe nail in the last game...

    4. Amey
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Knock on the ankle.
      Will be fine for Game weekend

  27. Goonsquad245
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Who would we prefer for the next few:

    A) Kane/Snodgrass + 1FT
    B) Hazard/Ings

    1. Pieterke30
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      B if Hazard fully fit

  28. Tosa86
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    My actual team in FPL is:

    Fabianski
    VVD - LaPorte - Alonso -
    Sanè - Salah (VC) - Fraser - Richarlison
    Chicharito - Aubameyang (C) - Jimenez

    Hennesey -Wan Bissaka - Doherty -Billing

    Bank: 2.0
    FT: 1

    For next GWs, make sense cut Jimenez and replace him with Ings, rashford, or other?
    Keep Auba or cut?

    Thanks for suggestion

    1. Goonsquad245
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Whyyyyy do you want to sell Jimenez?

      Save FT this week, consider something with Auba/Fraser to Hazard next week

      1. Tosa86
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Jimenez plays with reds and spurs in next 3 GWs, are not easy....
        Hazard next week?why?

  29. dee_top
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Kane-Richa —> Sterling-Rondon (-4), next GW Rondon —> Jimmy
    Yes or No??

    1. Goonsquad245
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      Think Rondon outscores Jimmy by 4 this week?

      1. FFHype
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        Lads, it's Fulham.

    2. Christina.
      • 16 Years
      7 years, 3 months ago

      A one week punt on Rondon. Now i have seen everything.

      1. dee_top
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 3 months ago

        I can’t get Sterling without -4, and I think that Rondon outscore Jimmy this GW, and Jimmy will outscore Rondon next GW, simple

        1. Christina.
          • 16 Years
          7 years, 3 months ago

          Don't be so sure. Use your comparison tool in the members section and run Rondon vs Jim. Save yourself a trade and get Jim this week.

          1. dee_top
            • 8 Years
            7 years, 3 months ago

            The thing is that I will use my WC after GW19

            1. dee_top
              • 8 Years
              7 years, 3 months ago

              And by comparison tool I see that Rondon has better stats in the last 6 GWs

  30. Bob B
    • 12 Years
    7 years, 3 months ago

    Where would you look to spend 1m ITB?

    Fabianski Steele
    Robertson Luiz Doherty Digne AWB
    Sterling Sane Richarlison Fraser MGW
    Kane Aubameyang Jiménez