Pro Pundits
4 April 2023 210 comments
avfc82 avfc82
Share:

Our top team of Pro Pundits and Hall of Famers write about all things Fantasy Premier League (FPL) throughout the season.

Only Premium Members are able to read every single one of these pieces, so sign up today to get full access not just to the editorial content but all of the other benefits, from hundreds of Opta stats to a transfer planner.

Here, five-time top 1k finisher Tom Freeman talks about Man City and his short-term transfer plans.

... 2

“Our display was almost perfect from the first minute to 93 in the way we played against a team who was our biggest rival in the last few seasons.” – Pep Guardiola

Manchester City picked apart Liverpool on Saturday, converting all four big chances, with two players, in particular, catching my eye from an FPL perspective.

JOHN STONES

In his last two Premier League outings, plus the 7-0 win over RB Leipzig in the UEFA Champions League, John Stones (£5.4m) has been used alongside Rodri (£5.6m) in defensive midfield, in a role reminiscent of Rico Lewis’ (£3.9m) earlier in the season.

Pep Guardiola has always liked one of his full-backs to wander into midfield in possession, and for now, it does feel like he is willing to trust Stones in this role.

“It’s not easy for him. I thought when I arrived that he has the quality to play there. It is different when you see all the game in front of you. In that position he is surrounded from Henderson, Salah, Fabinho, Elliott, Gakpo. He is surrounded like a bubble. To play there is not really easy. You have to have a lot of personality. A lot may be difficult, but alongside Rodri and Nathan [Ake] and Ruben [Dias], they helped us to understand the process.” – Pep Guardiola on John Stones

There has been a lot of changes to the Man City backline this season, but they have now kept five clean sheets in their last six matches in all competitions, with Stones, Manuel Akanji (£5.0m), Ruben Dias (£5.9m) and Nathan Ake (£5.0m) preferred of late, only missing the FA Cup win over Burnley.

When Stones’ touch heatmaps from Gameweeks 29 (left) and 27 (right) are compared, we can see is allowed to venture quite far forward, with a lot of his touches coming in the opposition half.


Stones looks very comfortable in this role. He rarely loses the ball, and with Southampton up next, who are having problems defending set-pieces (an area Stones often thrives in), he is a player I’d like to bring in.

JACK GREALISH

Jack Grealish (£6.8m) is in his best form for Man City at present.

Like so many new signings under Guardiola, he struggled to convince at first but has now started 10 league games in a row and produced an excellent performance against Liverpool on Saturday, with a goal and assist.

“I love it, man. I love football, I love playing, I love training. When it’s going well like this there’s nothing better. I feel back to my normal self, I’m playing with confidence, I feel fit. Scoring today and getting the assist is perfect.” – Jack Grealish

“All this season he has been playing really well. Now it’s the Jack we thought. Aston Villa fans know this Jack. Nothing changed it’s just a question of believing ‘I am part of that, and I can be here’. Now he has more minutes. The way he behaved in the beginning when he was not playing was exceptional. We are so satisfied for his performance. Today was amazing, he was really good. I like the standing ovation from our fans. He really deserved it.

Not just that, all season he has been playing well. Football is more than stats, it’s many things. The way he gives us the tempo to play and to make extra passes. I could not imagine with the big name he is and the price the club paid to have this humility to run like a teenager. That means a lot to me and the team. At the same time, he has to score more goals at home. Definitely.” – Pep Guardiola on Jack Grealish

Grealish now looks fully at home in Guardiola’s team and the attacking returns have been flowing quite nicely since the World Cup, with three goals and six assists in 12 starts (from a possible 14).

He has gone under the radar somewhat, with his ownership sitting at just 2.4%, but I’m finding it increasingly hard to ignore Grealish, given his strong all-round numbers from Gameweek 17 onwards:



210 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. jack88
    • 4 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    My BB is steele 4, shaw 1, saka 1, martinelli 5. Disaster or ok?

    1. TheDragon
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Not good as it stands but not a disaster.

      Depends what Steele and shaw do in next games.

      For me:
      - 15 minimum
      - 20 decent
      - 25 good
      - 25+ woohoo

    2. Chris_H
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Minimum ideally I always think of is 16 - as in the 'perfect' BB scenario you have 15 players playing twice, so minimum from your bench is 4x2x2.

    3. Black Knights
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Not great at the moment. Look back through your GWs; i bet you have quite a few that were worth more than 11.

      Could all change with Steele and Shaw though. I call 20+ a success.

    4. RamaJama
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Could still be OK, a Shaw CS and attacking return, and a Steele CS.

      Got 21 and Raya/Pinnock to go, so OK pleased with that.

    5. You Must Be Jokin Ere
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      If you get a combined 10 points more from Shaw/Steele then, its ok.
      I have Raya 6 +, Burn, 6+, Saka 1, Kane 7 BUT i taak a Hit to bring in Zepa & Bowen (for Ward & JWP)

    6. El Presidente
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      You have to look at the score of your 15 players rather just looking at the 4 benched. Its really random who people put in their benches when using the BB. I've seen Saka, Kane on the bench but also seen them on starting 11. The same for DGW players. What the logic? You bench defenders, SGW 0layers? You have to look at ypur overall score and judge on 15 players performance.

    7. Reece’s Pieces
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      It’s ok with more to come.

      BB is my least favourite chip. Makes you hold onto too strong a squad for ages and tends to underperform (just like now for me! Mainly as Haaland didn’t play at all)

    8. Rosey Palmer
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Not as big as some because of the single game week players but mine was not great either because Haaland +

      1. Reece’s Pieces
        • 4 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Hopefully owning him pays us back this weekend

  2. Wrong Captain Choice - Ag i…
    • 16 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Question for Leicester fans is Ward likely to regain his place under the caretaker manager?

    1. Dion D's Solo Shower
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      How on earth would they know?

      1. Wrong Captain Choice - Ag i…
        • 16 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Educated guess, opinion, watching their team on a regular basis? People take advice from this site who are doing far less than an educated guess.

    2. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Not really sure but the one thing I'd point out is that Iversen's performance was actually a lot better than it might appear judging from the result & the OG

    3. El Presidente
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      No, Iversen is safe.

  3. DavvaMC
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Do you think this is worth a -4 this week?

    Toney > Haaland
    Zinc > Stones

    Thanks

    1. Black Knights
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Could be. Will certainly be if Toney gets his yellow tomorrow.

    2. Conners
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Who would you play in defence if you didn't buy Stones? I wouldn't personally take a hit for a defender unless I couldn't field 11 or if they had a nice DGW.

      (FWIW - I have Zinc and he'll be 3rd on my bench).

      1. DavvaMC
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Current defence is:

        Chilwell / Zinc / Trippier / Schar / Estup

    3. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Yes. But Stones... does he make the starting XI?

      Because if you have the template Chilwell, Shaw, Trippier defense, that will see you through GW34 quite easily and with loads of nice attacking options, you will very likely want to be playing 3 atb.

      I'm leaning towards dumping Zinchenko for a 3.8m fodder. I want the money in the starting XI now that the BB is gone.

    4. Conners
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Personally, I'd play Estu / Chilwell / Trippier and get Stones for free later on.

    5. DavvaMC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Thanks all, probably the sensible move would be to go for Shaw.

      1. Rosey Palmer
        • 12 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        EO wise yes, if you care about rank

  4. Wrong Captain Choice - Ag i…
    • 16 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Question for Newcastle fans how likely is it that Howe goes 442 with Wilson and Isak upfront? I own Isak but I am a bit worried that Howe night start rotating the two. But also considering Newcastle's injury doubts/plus quick turnaround could Howe go 4-4-2?

    1. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Not a Newcastle fan, but Howe did point out recently that Isak can play wide too, so they can both start in the same formation (more likely than 442 I think). But the emerging consensus among Newcastle fans I've asked about this seems to be that Isak is now 1st choice

      1. Wrong Captain Choice - Ag i…
        • 16 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        OK thanks. I was just thinking since Wilson's cameo (and if he keeps knocking on door) it could force Howe into making changes.

    2. El Presidente
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Very unlikely. They can play together but not the setup Howe prefers

  5. Camzy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    I'm considering two different hits this week to get Haaland back in. I think he'll be fit for the weekend.

    A) Zinchenko + Toney > Haaland + Bueno
    B) Saka + Toney > Haaland + Grealish

    If Haaland is fit it will be one of the two.

    1. RUUD!
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      B

      1. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        I'm leaning much more heavily towards A tbh. Saka is a bit of a differential among engaged managers. Lots will have sold. I'm also thinking of giving him the captaincy next week if Haaland is not fit! Liverpool are awful and Arsenal have a full week to prepare. I just see a big score in that game.

        United vs Everton is unlikely to be a blowout. Everton have some fight in them since Dyche came in. If United look better midweek then maybe but we'll see.

        1. The Mentaculus
          • 4 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          This makes sense. I don't see many remaining games where you'd start Zinchenko (especially if you FH32) so there's minimal impact to this downgrade

        2. RUUD!
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          I see but would Bueno be a starter for you? Looking at his recent minutes I'd be concerned

        3. DavvaMC
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 5 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          If you downgrading to Bueno who would you be upgrading in midfield?

    2. FPL Emu
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I've been annoyed with missing out on 0.2 for B myself, so yeah, I'd do that one. Sets you up nicely for 34, and Grealish is hitting some nice form.

  6. The Polymath
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Is Salah a must to get in from 31?

    1. Wrong Captain Choice - Ag i…
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      No player is a must just the right combination of players to get the most points. Salah has been very hot and cold, you wouldn't be able to hang your hat on him like previous seasons IMO.

    2. RUUD!
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I would say so

    3. Qaiss
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      A midfielder or forward that you will never captain, as well as being the most expensive player in the game, cannot be a ‘must’

    4. I Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      No. He's a good option but far from a must. Haaland (LEI) and Kane (BOU) have great fixtures in 31 and it's difficult to fit all three.

  7. RUUD!
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Those with WC and FH still available what are you thinking, would be good to get some advice on this? I have a good team for GW30 so thinking WC in 31 and FH in 32 or dead end my team for 32 and WC in 33 and use FH after this?

    1. The Mentaculus
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Just gonna repost my answer to the same question from earlier today:

      Think there's 2 main routes, and it might depend on how heavy you want to go on Liverpool & City. Could FH34 if you don't want triple Liverpool and City punts (e.g. Stones/Grealish) in your core team, and use the WC to set up a more balanced squad that maybe still includes 2+ Arsenal. Or the more common FH32 & use the WC to set yourself up for DGW34

      1. RUUD!
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        thanks man, I'm thinking the former WC in 31 and FH in 32. My WC team for 31 would look like this, your thoughts?

        Ederson
        Estupinan Shaw Van Dijk Trippier
        Salah Grealish March Rashford
        Haaland Kane

        Bazunu Williams Mitoma Greenwood

        1. The Mentaculus
          • 4 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          Was just thinking its interesting how few threemium teams I've been seeing here recently compared to earlier in the season, especially with quality enablers like BHA mids (maybe just because most have really deep bench now). I guess having a WC still to play means that Kane will be of more a differential for you.

          Overall looks good. The only spot I have a slight issue with is Ederson. I can understand being led there by uncertainty over City CBs (almost went there myself for DGWs 20 & 23), but he's still useless for saves & bonus. Also the City backline seems a bit more settled, and more solid, now - so maybe I'd consider Ederson & VVD - Alisson & Stones/Dias?

          1. RUUD!
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 13 Years
            2 years, 9 months ago

            thanks for the input, yeah Ederson is purely there for guarantee of starts in City's back line, for the double in 34 also. Alisson & Stones/Dias is definitely something to think about

    2. Babit1967
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I’m probably going to fh in 32 & then wildcard in 34.

    3. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      on the face of it wildcard gw33 for the final 6 weeks looks cleaner.

    4. 1justlookin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      In a similar boat. My team is ok for gw30-32 so I'm probably gping to WC in GW33 or 34.
      I'm leaning towards using my FH in 37 or 38

  8. FPL Emu
    • 15 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    I may just end up going Kane to Haaland in the end, avoiding all sorts of hits and revamps. It hurts with those fixtures, but it is what it is.

    1. El Presidente
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I'm doing the same myself, Spurs is shaite and Kane's ceiling is 9 points anyway

    2. WVA
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      What hits and revamps do you need? Its quite easy and affordable to have them both with Salah in midfield.

      Raya
      Trippier Gabriel Shaw
      Salah Saka Rashford Mitoma
      Haaland Kane Watkins
      Steele Andreas Mings Tark

  9. Ask Yourself
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Can we all agree to let Haaland drop before bro hung him in please

    1. Ask Yourself
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Bringing*

    2. Berkshire Hafaway-Line
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      It you use a long drop his neck will snap and he will die instantly. A shorter drop will mean an excruciatingly slow strangulation.....so it depends.

      1. Ask Yourself
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Okayyyyyyy

        1. The Mentaculus
          • 4 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          Your phone was thinking of the other meaning of a "hung bro"? 😉

    3. Nomar
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Never sold him in the first place.

      Hence none of these types of Haaland headaches.

      1. Ask Yourself
        • 9 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        In fairness I only care so I can do Henry > Stones instead of Raya/Kepa > Ederson but it may be for the best as I’m sure any city outfield player will eventually be rotated given the UCL is still up for grabs

    4. The Mantis
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      I need this, literally 0.1

  10. JBG
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    What transfer(s) should I do?

    A) TAA to Mings/Moreno
    B) TAA+Isak to Mings/Moreno+Haaland -4
    C) Gakpo to KDB
    D) Watkins to Haaland

    C will leave me with no £ to bring in Haaland without taking a hit.

    1. Mambino
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      Wait and if it looks more likely than not that Haaland will be fit then do D. Unless you have a FH for 32 I would have thought you want TAA for that fixture

      1. JBG
        • 7 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        I don't think Pool defence is worth having anymore. If it wasn't for Haaland and Gnonto injury this GW I would have got ridden of TAA for a hit easily.

        1. Mambino
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          2 years, 9 months ago

          Fair enough - I have a FH that I will be using for GW32 and I'll be bringing him in for that GW. I'm also thinking of him or Robbo for GW34 and then for the rest of the season but I also understand where you'e coming from. I just think they might be better from GW31 until the end of the season given their fixtures, no other football and possible top 4 chase. TAA and Robbo also carry an attacking threat.

          1. JBG
            • 7 Years
            2 years, 9 months ago

            I see 1 max 2 CS in those fixtures tbh. And their attacking threat has been woeful this season, specially TAA.

            1. Mambino
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 12 Years
              2 years, 9 months ago

              sounds like you want to go with either A or B then, so go for it

              1. JBG
                • 7 Years
                2 years, 9 months ago

                Could also do Kane to Haaland tbf.

    2. Dušan Citizen
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 9 months ago

      c, but maybe get Grealish

      1. JBG
        • 7 Years
        2 years, 9 months ago

        Yeah not a bad call that either.

  11. Fit_to_drop
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Post Bench Boost team. Inevitably going to get this wrong but does this selection look reasonable for GW30? Isak becomes Haaland if it looks like he plays against Southampton.

    Raya
    Chilwell Trippier Zouma
    Maddison Mitoma Rashford Saka
    Watkins Isak Kane

    BENCH: Arrizabalaga Estupiñán Ødegaard Botman

  12. The Polymath
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    A couple of hits can get me this team in 31 and for 33 onwards (Playing FH in 32)

    Kepa
    Chillwell, Trippier, Shaw
    Salah, Fernandes, Rashford, Mitoma, Marsh
    Haaland, Kane

    Iversen, Estupinan, Botman, Greenwood

    Worth it?

  13. AutoFill 2021
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    2 years, 9 months ago

    Minus 17 for my hits so far and a 250k fall.