[sbu_large_image] Opinion
3 April 2013 1481 comments
Mark Mark
Share:

Plenty have argued that the goalkeeper position is the most important on the football field, the custodian a vital cog in any squad. In Fantasy terms, however, the goalkeeper has gradually slipped into oblivion.

He’s become an afterthought, a position that needs to be filled rather than one that is considered a key contributor to our squads or starting XI. It’s time for the Fantasy games to address this – goalkeepers should be one of our priority positions, with significant rewards for good selection.

You only have to scan the latest Fantasy Premier League (FPL) rankings to realise the issue. Joe Hart, the City keeper, is currently the top rated stopper in the game, with a miserly 121 points – that’s some 81 points behind Robin Van Persie, the leading striker and 80 points behind the top midfielder, Gareth Bale. Perhaps more significantly, with 121 points, Hart is roughly the equivalent of Lukas Podolski up front (117 points) or Aaron Lennon in midfield (118) – both bit part Fantasy assets who many would hardly consider mainstays.

At this point, we have to give credit where it’s due and remember that the FPL is a game that attempts to reward goalkeepers – there are save points on offer, available exclusively to keepers and yet, it’s clear, that these are not enough to allow this position to bridge the gap and take on a significant level of importance. This situation is compounded by the bonus points system that leans towards attacking players and very rarely recognises goalkeepers – Asmir Begovic is the current top earner with just seven bonus points.

In the Sky Sports game, the goalkeeper situation is exacerbated by the fact that there are no save points on offer. Hart can only gain from clean sheets in this game and his total of 107 points, whilst top ranked for goalkeepers, is some 116 points behind Santi Cazorla, the leading midfielder, and a huge 135 behind Luis Suarez, the top ranked forward. Indeed, by comparison, Joe Hart has fetched the same number of points as Fernando Torres in this game and less than James McCarthy of Wigan – again, then, Hart’s importance as an asset seems severely underplayed.

Quite simply, clean sheets are not enough. They’ve been in decline in recent seasons and this term we could be heading for the worst ever season for five years. Back in 2008/09, there were 247 shutouts on show in the Premier League, an average of one clean sheet every 3.08 matches. By 2010/11 this had dropped to 191 in total, an average every 3.91 matches. While we saw a slight recovery last season, currently this term is tracking an average of a shut-out every 3.92 matches. In simple terms then, in the last five seasons, the clean sheet has declined as a Fantasy football scoring method. Have the games adjusted their rules accordingly? Empathically, I’d say they’ve stood still.

Adjusting the balance with the price list is not enough and, in fact, when you look at a stalwart keeper like Pepe Reina, back in 2008/09 when, statistically, there were more clean sheets about, you could acquire his FPL services for 6.0. He started this season at the same price, despite the fact that clean sheets are seemingly far harder to come by. Low and behold, this season Reina has 86 points to his name, in 2008/09 he scored a mammoth 169 points. The decline in points output is pretty obvious and yet, presumably to balance increases in attacking positions, Reina’s initial price has been frozen.

As mentioned, the FPL have at least attempted to compensate for keepers with save points and while this successfully narrows the gap between the heavy-hitter clean sheet getters and the budget and mid-price keepers, it still falls short in terms of bringing goalkeepers in line with the other positions.

Fantasy games now have to find the confidence to take matters further. Goalkeeper points scoring needs examining in detail with save points established as the norm, with points for clean sheets hiked for goalkeepers and perhaps even used as a multiplier or an unlock. In effect, goalkeepers should be rewarded further for clean sheets when they are seen to be an effective last line of defence. Let’s double the save points awarded when a clean sheet is won or, presuming the data gathered is correct, award a point for each save if a shut-out is achieved.

Looking at Joe Hart as an example, given that he has fewer saves to make playing in front of the City back four, he would not benefit greatly from double save points when a clean sheet is won. However, if saves were awarded as points in a clean sheet scenario, he’d be 16 points better off – taking him to 137 points in total (Hart earned just one save point in a match with a clean sheet this season). Jussi Jaaskelainen, the keeper with the most saves in the FPL game, would be 29 points better off, having kept eight clean sheets. Minus the nine save points he already gained from these matches, this would take him to 141 points. Jaaskelainen’s biggest points haul would have come against Fulham in Gameweek 3 when he made eight saves – he would therefore have amassed 14 points – two appearance points, four for the clean sheet and eight save points.

Are these totals that wrong? Shouldn’t a keeper have the opportunity to rival strikers and earn double figures without having to pull off a penalty save? Wouldn’t it be more exciting to watch your keeper fling himself to make save after save knowing that, if he can just keep his sheet clean, these would convert into points at the end of the match? In my view, this mechanic would rejuvenate keepers and make them a position that excites when watching games, rather than a player that can only lose you points as the match goes on.

These are radical changes and some serious modelling would be required to ensure balance is achieved but, looking at the obvious decline in clean sheets and the gradual decay of the goalkeeper as a position of importance, it seems obvious that such a step has to be considered. When we see squads with non-playing goalkeepers and top ranked managers settling on budget and mid-price stoppers in order to spend in attacking areas, it screams out that there is a balance issue.

Fantasy football should attempt to mirror reality in order to create a compelling experience. It’s up to the games to react and address this or go on letting the goalkeeper become a meaningless commodity when, in reality, he’s possibly the most important player on the pitch.

Mark Mark created the beast. He's now looking to tame it.

  1. The Shadow
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 14 days ago

    Duelling Bembas?!?

    Open Controls
    1. fatherted
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 14 days ago

      Seems so. All Ba locks to me.

      Open Controls
  2. Open Controls
  3. Louis
    • 13 Years
    13 years, 14 days ago

    Need to make room for Sagna/Mertesacker or Riether for DGW. Who should I get rid of: Azpi, Enrique or Clichy??

    Open Controls
    1. The Shadow
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 14 days ago

      Enrique is only one without possible double upcoming.

      Open Controls
    2. Kagawa-san-mia
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 14 days ago

      enrique

      Open Controls
    3. Adnan Shah
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 14 days ago

      Enrique

      Open Controls
    4. fatherted
      • 14 Years
      13 years, 14 days ago

      Gael

      Open Controls
  4. /
    • 13 Years
    13 years, 14 days ago

    New post

    Open Controls
  5. LOCO ABREU
    • 14 Years
    13 years, 14 days ago

    Next week:
    A) Zaba>Sagna, keep Bale,play Townsend(eve) and Mariappa(POOL)/Turner(Ars)
    B)Davies>Mert, sell Bale,play Sissoko(SUND) and Zaba(WIG)
    Still have the wc. Keep or sell Bale?

    Open Controls
  6. RedLightning
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 15 Years
    13 years, 14 days ago

    Forwards can be out-and-out strikers, deep-lying inside forwards playing 'in the hole' or wingers.
    Midfielders can be attacking or defensive, central or wide.
    Defenders can be fullbacks, wingbacks or central defenders.
    And all of these outfielders can also play out of position.
    But a goalkeeper is a goalkeeper is a goalkeeper and is not interchangable with an outfielder.
    So the number of points scored by a goalkeeper compared with an outfielder is not important. But perhaps the spread of points between a top goalkeeper and an average one could be improved. I don't see why he should get more points per save just because he has also kept a clean sheet, but perhaps he could get, say, 6 points for a clean sheet compared to a defender's 4. Perhaps he could get a point for every two saves instead of for every three. And he certainly gets a raw deal from the PPI bonus points system.
    And talking of the PPI bonus point system, I think it is ridiculous that the most boring matches are awarded the greatest number of bonus points. One recent 0-0 draw resulted in no less than 5 players being awarded 2 bonus points each. Only 6 bonus points ought to be awarded for each match. When there is a tie on PPI scores, then the players involved could be separated by giving an order of priority to the various components that contribute to the PPI scores.

    Open Controls
    1. Twisted Saltergater
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      13 years, 14 days ago

      Great post, agree entirely.

      Due to the lack of clean sheets in the PL, I'd go as far as awarding 5 pts to defenders for a CS, and 6 for goalkeepers. 1 bonus point per 3 saves is about right to avoid goalkeepers playing for more porous defences being more worthwhile than the 'keepers at the top clubs.

      Open Controls
  7. alexwooty
    • 13 Years
    13 years, 13 days ago

    Apologies if this opinion has been given elsewhere or if such a thing already exists. But I'd like to see an alternative FPL where midfielders are split into attacking and defensive midfielders, and their points rewards are adjusted accordingly. In real life, formations are often set up more as 4-2-3-1 than 4-3-3 anyway - why shouldn't Fantasy Football mirror this? And why should FPL teams be able to field 3 out-and-out strikers when this rarely ever happens in reality?

    I'd suggest a scoring system along the lines of the following:

    DMs - 1 point per x times they win the ball through tackles/interceptions, 3 points for a clean sheet, 3 for an assist, 5 for a goal, -1 point per x times they lose the ball through being tackled or having a pass intercepted. Hence this rewards the skills that good DMs should have, namely winning possession and keeping it.

    AMs - 1 for a clean sheet, 3 for an assist, 4 for a goal and maybe 1 point per key pass (i.e. the kind of pass that should really result in an assist yet the striker fluffs the 1-on-1 - I believe Opta have a way of counting these)

    Rather than rigidly defining a player as either a DM or an AM at the start of the season, the points that they score you could be defined by whether you choose to field them as a DM or an AM in a particular week. You should have to field 5 defensive outfield players (DF plus DM) and 5 attacking players (AM plus STR) for balance.

    I'm not suggesting for a moment that this could or should replace the current FPL system - but it'd be an interesting experiment!

    Open Controls
    1. RedLightning
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 13 days ago

      I wouldn't be too surprised if Mark's next opinion piece suggests something similar!

      Open Controls
    2. RedLightning
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      13 years, 13 days ago

      Yes, defensive midfielders are certainly under-rewarded compared to their attacking brethren. Perhaps it might help them if all defenders and midfielders could earn points for completed clearances.
      Having to field 5 defensive outfielders (at least 3 of whom would presumably still have to be defenders) could lead to some strange consequences though - your squad could still include 5 attacking players as your midfielders, but 2 of them would have to be nominated as DMs whenever you wished to play 3-2-2-3 or 3-2-3-2.

      Open Controls