Community

Exploding The Differential Myth

This is the first in an occasional series of articles I plan to post over the season, de-bunking commonly held tenets of Fantasy Premier League (FPL) strategy. First up: the differential.

A differential is a player with low ownership, either in your mini-league or across the FPL universe who, if he scores well, will propel your team up the rankings ahead of teams without him. You choose the differential in preference to similarly priced but more commonly-owned players with the same long-term points potential. A simple concept for sure… but is it valid?

The Essential Differential

First let’s look at the situation where the differential is not only valid but essential. Imagine your team is 30 points behind your mini-league leader with three Gameweeks to go. You both have Wayne Rooney, the top scoring player in the game (stay with me folks!) In this situation you might choose to drop Rooney to get Sergio Aguero (you’re with me on this one), recently returned from injury, in the hope that Aguero (who you will captain) will go crazy and outscore Rooney. Your only way to catch the league leader is to play different, high-scoring players – without them you are certain to lose. Sticking with Rooney and scoring exactly what your rival scores does nothing for you. Of course, the differential can backfire – you can lose ground – but this is the risk you take to give yourself the opportunity to win the league.

That’s the only situation in which the differential is useful. The rest of the time you should simply choose the player you think will score the most points – yes, it’s that simple. There are several reasons why. First of all, the differential concept depends on week-to-week point variation between two similarly priced players with similar points potential. Aguero might outscore Rooney in the final three Gameweeks, but over a longer period their relative production will average out. The power of the differential is eroded over longer periods. Second is a much more fundamental idea; that being differentiated from your opponents is as simple as having different players from them. You can pretty much guarantee that nobody will have the same players as you – that’s certainly true in your mini-league. Therefore, you already have differentials in your team, probably many of them.

The High Ownership Differential

Let’s explore this differential idea further. The highest-ownership player in your squad might have 40% ownership across the FPL universe. But remember that 40% ownership means that 60% don’t have that player. Now let’s consider your next highest-owned player – let’s say at 30% ownership. The chance that another team has both of your two highest-owned players is 40% x 30% – i.e. 12%, meaning that 88% of teams have none or only one of them. Add in your third highest-owned player at 20% ownership, and the compounded differential is around 2% – now 98% teams have at least one of the thee different from you. You can see where I’m going with this. Differentiation doesn’t have to be captured in a single player, but comes from all the players in your team. The idea that a single player, selected for low ownership when compared to other teams, and assessed over the course of a season, will give you the opportunity to rise above other teams, purely based on low ownership, is nonsense. I’ll say it again – pick the players you think will score the most points. The differentials will take care of themselves.

24 Comments Post a Comment
  1. matej - cruising casually
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    I agree.

    Looking forward for the debunking series! 🙂

    Open Controls
    1. Scotch Jock
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Spot on!

      Open Controls
      1. Maine Man
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 8 months ago

        Another point to make is that unless you're planning on being top worldwide, is there really that much difference between finishing 10,000th or 20,000th?

        That means that the only thing nearly every player is playing for is to be the best in their mini-league, which then means that it doesn't really matter if 30 or 40% own a player worldwide - it's the player differentials in your mini-league that count

        At that point, everything Home Run has stated really comes into play

        Open Controls
  2. Bøwstring The Carp
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    That's actually a great point made in the last section that I've never even realised.

    Great stuff !! Incidentally just checked and I've got 4 heavily owned players (Rooney, Sturridge, Hazard, Mata) with lesser owned players like Siggy, Silva and Jovetic in the mix.

    Open Controls
    1. Ginkapo FPL
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Except that there are three million teams.

      Open Controls
  3. Margarido
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Great article, short and direct. Congratulations.

    Rooney - 45.5%
    Ramsey - 34.6%
    Costa - 33.8%
    Mata - 22.7%
    Fabregas - 21.1%

    Open Controls
    1. Evanio
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      Assume these are your high owned players-I have all 5 too 🙂 so much for differentials !!

      Open Controls
    2. La Vida Latte
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      I have all except Fab 🙂

      Open Controls
  4. Ad4m
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    I agree..

    But isn't it great when you pick up a player in their first game back from injury and they slot 2, get max Bps and you climb 100k

    🙂

    Open Controls
    1. saata
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      That reminds me of Ramsey last season..

      Open Controls
  5. Mata-Is-The-Juan
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    If there was a way to upvote the article I would.
    Great read. Looking for the rest of the articles in your series.

    Open Controls
  6. saata
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Great article.. Different look over very discussed topic.

    I completely agree. The time for the differentials is the last couple of gameweeks and only if you have to make up a big difference. One should never get discouraged by 100 points lead in the early season stage and start jumping on crazy punts - keep playing your game and if you make the right decisions, that difference will be burnt in no time..

    (I was 120 points off the lead last season and ended 100 over the second one and never jumped on crazy differentials - Hazard(C) for his hattrick against Newcastle did the trick 😀 )

    Open Controls
  7. applebonkers
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    amen brother

    Open Controls
  8. andyinasia
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    HRB - can you explain the issue of price falls. For example, say I want a 4m defender. I can choose Bruce (22% ownership) or Targett (0.5% ownership). If neither end up starting and owners dump them, is it the case that Bruce will fall in price and Targett will likely not because there are few owners to transfer him out?

    Open Controls
  9. notoriousbmp
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    is chambers nailed on?

    Open Controls
    1. andyinasia
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      For tomorrow he is. Might be a one-week wonder.

      Open Controls
  10. Clam. ☘️
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Isla nailed on anyone? Good differential? Or should I just get Caulker?

    Open Controls
    1. Evanio
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 8 months ago

      The irony 🙂 yes I think he is a good differential and probably will be nailed on (maybe not 1st week or so) BUT as home run baker has written, this stage of the season, it's a punt rather than a differential. Do you think he will be higher scoring than any other 5.0 defender? If yes, get him, if no, don't get him-simple as that.

      Open Controls
  11. Billy Ketsu
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Great article. More please.

    Open Controls
  12. The Hindu Monkey
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Superb. Most intelligently obvious piece for a while. And excellent food for thought.

    Open Controls
  13. The Mighty Slovenian
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Your arguments make sense, but you forgot the most important thing about the low owned individual differentials. They are fun to own and the anticipation of their potential big haul makes up for their general low scores 😀

    Sometimes you just have to break the template to bring the fun back.

    Open Controls
  14. The Road Not Taken
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Yes, great article.

    Open Controls
  15. tm245
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    Very cool, especially the last section. I think the SmartyPants site is also helpful in sorting through these ideas as well since a sense of the overall game and the top 10k gives an even bigger picture. Cheers for this, and I look forward to the rest of the series.

    Open Controls
  16. Voyeur
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 8 months ago

    I agree with the theory, but ownership probability of popular players are linked, so your calculations aren't likely to be true. For example, if a player owns the 40% ownership player, he's probably more likely to own the 30% ownership player than an average player - probably 50% of the 40% owners own the 30% as well...
    This is especially true later in the season eg last year - if you had Yaya, you were probably an active player and therefore more likely to have Suarez & Hazard.

    Open Controls