Fixtures

Frisking the Fixtures – Gameweek 22 – The Weak

Having analysed those sides with the strongest upcoming schedules over the next four to six Gameweeks, we now check out those with tougher fixtures to follow. Aston Villa and Leicester brace themselves for some hard times ahead, whilst Man City and Liverpool are also set for a testing run of matches.

Leicester

“frisking

Nigel Pearson’s side have home clashes with Stoke and Palace in the next three Gameweeks to continue the form that has harvested seven points and a pair of clean sheets in their last three league outings.

Unfortunately for the Foxes, they also go head-to-head with Man United, Arsenal, Everton and Chelsea in the upcoming six rounds of fixtures, suggesting Fantasy points could be few and far between. With three-goal Jeffrey Schlupp injured, Marcin Wasilewski’s 3.9 price tag enhances his appeal as a cheap fifth defender, and with Riyad Mahrez still off on international duties, only David Nugent – with a goal and assist in the last three – has shown any signs of form.

Liverpool

“frisking

A trip to struggling Villa offers hope for the Reds this weekend, but beyond that one, they square up to four of the current top seven (WHM, TOT, sot, MCI) and also face a Merseyside derby trip to Everton.

At the back, Martin Skrtel has earned bonus each time his side have delivered a clean sheet, though the big centre-half may have to rely on his aerial threat in the box to remain in consideration. The imminent return of Daniel Sturridge could provide the spark that reignites our interest in Brendan Rodgers’ main men, though in the meantime, Raheem Sterling – back after a weekend rest – and Philippe Coutinho, with returns in four of his last five, are the likeliest to deliver for the ever-improving Reds, who have dropped just two points in the last four Gameweeks.

Manchester City

“frisking

City’s next two fixtures play a significant part in their place in this week’s article. Nonetheless, having hammered Arsenal 6-3 at the Etihad last season, those holding the likes of Sergio Aguero and David Silva will have little fear ahead of this weekend’s match, though there’s no denying the trip to Stamford Bridge somewhat curbs our enthusiasm.

Trips to Liverpool and Stoke – the latter having merged victorious at the Etihad earlier in the campaign – could throw a spanner in the works, though our fears are perhaps more focused on the City defence here. Whilst Aguero has shown his fixture-proof potential time and again, a defence that has conceded twice to both Burnley and Sunderland in the last three matches hardly instils much confidence. Vincent Kompany’s return could boost the points of potential of Pablo Zabaleta and Gael Clichy, though – City shipped just one goal in the last four with their captain on board.

Also Be Wary Of….

Swansea
With Wilfried Bony now finally off to City, Garry Monk faces a tough task in addressing a run of form which has seen the Welsh club score more than a single goal in just one of the last ten Gameweeks.

Swansea go head-to-head with Chelsea and Southampton’s resilient defences in the next two and then face Sunderland, West Brom and United’s stubborn rearguards. Few will be willing to gamble on Bafetimbi Gomis right now, in spite of his kind 6.5 price tag, whilst Monk’s recent admission that Gylfi Sigurdsson has been playing through the pain barrier with a foot problem is not what the playmaker’s owners want to hear. At the back, it’s worth noting that all eight of Swansea’s clean sheets have arrived against clubs in the bottom nine, suggesting that invetment in the likes of Lukasz Fabianksi and Neil Taylor should be left alone for now.

West Ham
Big Sam’s side have just two favourable fixtures in the next eight Gameweeks as the schedule continues to turn against them. Those holding Hammers players will be looking for returns at home to Hull this weekend, but following that one, only the visit of Palace in Gameweek 27 (liv, MUN, sot, tot, CPL, CHE, ars) offers some respite.

Stewart Downing sits in 25% of Fantasy Premier League sides but his owners have a real decision to make once the Tigers clash is out of the way, whilst Andy Carroll’s four goals and an assist in the last seven may not be enough to convince. At the back, Allardyce’s outfit have mustered just one clean sheet in the last eight and it’s fair to say that the appeal of Aaron Cresswell and co. looks limited right now.

Aston Villa
Paul Lambert’s side approach a testing run of fixtures in dire form after scoring just one goal in their last six fixtures. Villa will be hoping new playmaker Carles Gil can spark the struggling Christian Benteke back into form after a series of poor displays, though with back-to-back showdowns against Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea immediately on the cards, there’s little hope of returns at either end of the pitch.

The Midlands side also travel to Hull and Newcastle and play host to Stoke over the next six matches, though it’s mainly their defence that’s likely to benefit here. Villa haven’t conceded more than a single goal since Gameweek 10, though have frustratingly earned just three clean sheets in the 11 matches over that period. Brad Guzan’s save points and Alan Hutton’s 4.4 price tag are the main attractions, though their appeal is somewhat lessened by a knee injury to Ron Vlaar, which could keep the centre-half on the sidelines for six weeks.

Paul Is certain he won't make the same mistakes next season. Follow them on Twitter

1,379 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Capt. Krypton
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    The more i think about it, the more appealing Bony at city seems from a fantasy perspective, im guessing the major question is...minutes. How often will he be rotated with the likes of Dzeko and Jovetic?

    Watching this space, but can see minutes playing a major factor in Bony not being in our teams, like Dzeko and Jovetic.. decent players and known to score goals but you wouldn't spend 9m on a striker who sometimes might or sometimes might not feature.

    1. internal error
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Even if he doesn't start in some games, I can see him coming on and scoring with the chances created in that City side

      1. Capt. Krypton
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        maybe, i'll give it a month to see how they utilise him at city then i might hop on board.

        1. internal error
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          That would be the sensible thing but I think his output at City will be significantly higher than it has at Swansea this season

        2. Bollard
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Easy to downgrade Aguero to Bony if needs be. Plenty of time/ money to see how this pans out for Bony

    2. ⭐ Bemba_Da ⭐
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      he is a negredo replacement, nothing more

      1. internal error
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        He's better than Negredo though and Negredo was starting games when he was in form

    3. littlebig
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Wait and see is best course of action. He could blow up though, especially if Aguero gets injured again. I reckon he will be second choice forward behind Aguero

  2. PastaFasul
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Panti or Heaton for gk this week?

    1. The Nuttman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Heaton obvs.

    2. Just A Hat
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      The Heat (is) on (on the street)

        1. Just A Hat
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          😀

    3. GoRedz
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Heaton

  3. JK - Cønt ⭐
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Bottomed again FFS

    assuming that a -4 the week before wc is a no-no which of these is better

    a) Kolarov and Mangala, ADM and Aguero

    b) Kolarov/Mangala, Cresswell/Jenks, Chadli and Rooney

    1. danishdynamite
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I would not touch Kolo would a stinky stick, but Mangala's a decent enough pick assuming he's nailed-ish

      I would not fancy either of the west ham full backs either, as their fixtures are pure dogmuck

      Having just shipped Rooney to avoid losing out to the inveitable Auro price rises, I'd caution against him too

      So A with someone else (anyone else, apart fomr a WHU defender) instead of Kolorov

      1. danishdynamite
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        *Ageuro

      2. littlebig
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Mangala is second choice central defender after Kompany, Demichelis next after him. He's pretty much nailed. He's decent in the air too, due a set piece goal methinks

    2. internal error
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Don't get Kolarov. He will be rotated and Clichy is playing much better atm

    3. Ruth_NZ
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I like the look of Cresswell this week. Baines also worth considering if cash allows.

  4. arnojswfc
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Hey guys. Help on my wildcard team? Done it for the first time 🙂
    De Gea/ Pantilimon
    Terry, Fonte, Trippier, Baird, Kelly
    Di Maria, Hazard, Sterling, Puncheon, Boyd
    Aguero, Rooney, Kane 🙂

    1. Hasselbaink Forever - Defoe…
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Not a fan of Rooney for FPL but I'm guessing you are

      1. arnojswfc
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Not scored in three and RVP injured. Reckon he'll do well next two game weeks. Then putting Costa back in 🙂

    2. A.T
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Very nice

      1. arnojswfc
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Only one I'm worried about is Sanchez not being in my team. I don't think personally though that he'll do as good now considering Walcott, Ozi and Giroud are back in the team. As well as Welbeck coming back with Ramsey too. Points will be shared but we'll see.

    3. danishdynamite
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Can you afford Rooney > Costa ? If not I'd rather have Giroud than Rooney, esp as you have ADM as utd 'cover'

      1. arnojswfc
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        0.1 m short Danish. Have a good feeling about Rooney this GW though

  5. Ser Football 42
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Forster,
    Cresswell, Bertrand, Ivan, (Kelly, Wasilewski)
    Sterling, Downing, ADM, Fabregas, Sanchez
    Aguero, Costa, (Barnes )

    Going Aguero over Kane, Risky but have to go with my gut

    Good to go?

    1. Joey Barton and Friends
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      HA! I have Barnes too. Surely you need to get Kane in though?

      1. Ser Football 42
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Not sure, it's tough but think I'd rather have Aguero in

    2. Monkey Hanger
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Can you not afford Kelly to Baines?

      If not TV can't be as good as most.

      1. Ser Football 42
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        I'm just not on WC so I don't want to take a hit

  6. Templatetastic
    Will - Fantasy Football Hub
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    As a casual I get annoyed at people who comment on teams being to template.

    They are template for a reason – because they are good players and top managers own them. A common reply to this is that you can’t rise in rank if you only own template players. Wrong!

    If you take the 2 most highly owned players from each position in the top 10k Sanchez (87%), Hazard (87%), Costa (79%) and Kane (83%) - do some simple math and you find that ALL of these 4 players are owned by less than 50% of managers in the top 10k.

    So if they all perform you get a jump on over half of the top 10k – not bad eh!?

    If you take all 11 most owned players – and hence THE most template team – this dramatically drops to around 0.2% of managers with all 11 players in their squad.

    So having the most template team is, in a weird way, differential.

    Granted not all highly owned players are good fantasy options - but the argument for not having a template player or a template squad because you cant rise in rank is completely flawed.

    1. Raddy
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Agreed but,

      A true casual would never write this. 😉

      1. A.T
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Or be a member 😀

        1. Sess!
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          or be on this site full stop.

          1. Will - Fantasy Football Hub
            • 12 Years
            9 years, 3 months ago

            Haha.. tbf I'm not really a casual anymore. Ffs has sucked me in 😉

            Still think that people can go looking for punts and differentials to often and a casual's perspective is needed sometimes.

            1. Ruth_NZ
              • 9 Years
              9 years, 3 months ago

              I think your calculation is wrong. 58% of the top 1000 have all four of Sanchez, Hazard, Costa and Kane according to FFF. If you take Costa out of it (which some are) it's 76% owning all three. You won't get a jump on many players at the top by owning those three. It's more a matter of keeping pace.

              There are only two ways of gaining on the top 1000 as far as I can see. First is to eliminate the high ownership player(s) that you don't think will perform well and to replace them with someone that performs better. Second is to make better captain decisions than they do.

              1. TorresMagic™
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 14 Years
                9 years, 3 months ago

                Very true.

              2. Will - Fantasy Football Hub
                • 12 Years
                9 years, 3 months ago

                That would make sense with my estimate - you would expect a higher % of top 1k managers to own those players.

                Anyway you still jump on 46% of the top 1k with just those 4 - pretty good if you ask me. These are by far the most owned players (next is silva ~60%) - add in defenders (wisdom highest ~40%) and teams are very different.

    2. Just A Hat
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I'm top of my mini league so going down the Chelsea route and playing defensively and seeing the season off 😀

      1. Skipdipper
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        I've gone the other way and not playing safe

        Most people will navigate towards the best players. It's common sense I guess

    3. Doolittle
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I get this. It can be boring when everyone has the same players, but as you say, they are usually template because they are the best options. Getting captaincy right is key, and getting players earlier in the season than others (a crucial part of me being top 4k, and at one point being 600-odd, is that I had Sanchez from the start).

      1. Will - Fantasy Football Hub
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Captaincy is crucial. Although Im pretty crap at it and still top 400. For me its more about getting the best players (usually highly owned) and rarely taking punts.

        Some punts can payoff, but over the season your more likely to lose than gain.

        That said I do have berahino in my team!

      2. Back on the horse
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Agreed captaincy is a big diffferential

    4. GoRedz
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Agreed, it shouldn't be a reason not to pick a player. Only points matter.
      That being said, it makes the weekend more exciting for me to own a player below 15 % ownership.
      Exciting but also stressful.

      More than looking at full team, I have the feeling captaincy is of major importance, and I suck at it (managed to avoid every haul from everyone).

    5. Koflok
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I think template is good. When people say it's template around here it doesn't necesarily a bad thing IMO. Template for a reason.

      And it's only template in FFS which have like, 25k (?) out of the 3 mill player. That represent a mere 1%.

      1. Ruth_NZ
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        25k? 60% of 3.5m teams are classed as 'active'. That's 2.1m active teams. Let's guess that 600k of those are actually 2nd or 3rd teams managed by the same person. That leaves 1.5m active managers at a reasonable guess.

        FFS is known as the primary advice site for FPL. If you google "fantasy football" you get FFS up as an option without having to type it.

        If only 20% of active managers look on here from time to time that's probably 300k. I suspect it's more than that myself. Which is why this site is so good at creating bandwagons.

        1. Bojan Horsemack
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          There's too much guesswork in there to get to your conclusion of 20% of managers / 300k people browsing this site. Highly, highly doubt that's the case.

    6. Pasqualinho
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      You can't be casual and annoyed. It's not possible.

      1. littlebig
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Ah but you can though

    7. the Penman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Exactly. Getting most of a template team isn't template.

    8. GreenWindmill
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I like this post a lot.

      I have previously considered making a post providing some stats around how many permutations of team there would be with only 30 players available to choose from (4 GKs, 10 DFs, 10 MDs, 6 STs) and some further analysis of how ownership is spread to demonstrate the fallacy that is the assertion that only by having low ownership players can you differentiate yourself.

      I've never bothered because it was going to be nerdy to the point that people would simply ignore it - you've presented it much more clearly than I would. Any given combination of players is sufficiently different to almost everyone else to allow rises and falls to happen.

      1. Piggs Boson
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Nothing's too nerdy here. I'd read it 🙂

        But having PvA Keane Wisdom instead of Chester Baird Colocinni is hardly going to make a huge difference. And it's only the minor players that vary amongst the FFS template team, the core remains similar.

        1. GreenWindmill
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          In any given week that can be the difference of 3 clean sheets and/or goals/assists/bonus though - 15 points no sweat. Take into account captaincy choice and benching decisions and there are enough permutations that I never worry about ownership %. I know I'm in the minority though, people get very excitable on the subject 🙂

          1. Piggs Boson
            • 12 Years
            9 years, 3 months ago

            +1

            Many of those things are luck based and tend to balance out over the season though 🙂

    9. Piggs Boson
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I thought a template team was just template for this site. So you will go up OR, but not overtake competitors in FFS leagues easily.

      Also, you don't have to match EVERY player in a team for it to be template. Just the main core. So your stats are a little misleading imo.

      1. Camp No No
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Plus many of the 11 most owned players are not in the template of the moment (there are dead teams, for example).

    10. Greasy
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Being template on this site is probably a good thing though!

      FFS would be mainly players who are very good at the game and most would strive to be in top 1000 if not higher.

      With this being said seeing someone in multiple RMTs on here does not necessarily mean they are highly owned it means that the top players who use this site have that player which is a good thing. Take Pva for example, he is in many many wildcard teams on this site but has 1% ownership in the game. I think following this sites 'template' team is never a downside and has mostly advantages due to the number of good players on this site.

      If you took the 'template' team from FFS RMTs and left it as a dead team it would definitely beat the team with just the highest owned players come the end of the season.

      What I'm saying is I don't think the "everyone has him in there team so I won't gain anything" argument is very valid. If everyone on here has him there is probably a reason.

      1. Will - Fantasy Football Hub
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Yes, completely agree.

        Its when people use the word template as a criticism that is annoying. Following the template on this site is often very advantageous

    11. Cars and Mané
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I'm afraid your maths is wrong. Those four players could be owned by 79% of players. They are not independent so you cannot simply multiply through.

      1. Greasy
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Noticed this too

      2. Ziegler1988
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        It's 58% for those four in the top 1k. FFFix very handy for this

      3. Will - Fantasy Football Hub
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        While you are technically correct, I would argue that they are virtually independent and my math is pretty good as a rough guide.

        I don't think that owning Costa drastically effects the chance of owning Sanchez or Hazard for example (if anything maybe less due to price constraints).

        1. ronmadpirlo
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          They are not independent. The reason is the minority that don't own a player eg Kane are more likely to enjoy going against the grain and are more likely to have other differentials in their team.

          You still have a point but it is important to point out the error so as not to mislead people

    12. J0E
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I so much agree with this. This is my entire strategy wrapped up in one hot topic. 🙂

      1. Will - Fantasy Football Hub
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Great minds 😀

    13. Ziegler1988
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Great post. The "template" is constantly changing anyway: in December, Azpi was the template Chelsea defender and now it's Terry. Just pick the people you think will score the most points and it's highly unlikely your rivals will have the exact same team. Even then your captain choices will likely be different.

    14. ronmadpirlo
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      It depends on your aspirations. If you are happy with your position and don't want to take big risks going with template players is a good idea.

      If you feel like your season has gone badly so far you may wish to take some punts as you may feel you have nothing to lose.

      Me personally? My season has gone well but I could see myself taking some crazy punts before the end of the season to chase the dream of finishing as high as possible

    15. SEASIDER
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      The error in the maths increases as you expand the series to 11 players. This means that the template is not a differential, weird way or not.

      I have often thought that a good mix is something like 4 big punts (value-add players, call it alpha) and 7 high ownership players (allowing you to benefit from the rising tide, call it beta). By choosing the highest ownership players you can most closely approximate the overall league (or a specific segment) using only part of your squad, maximizing your beta. This then allows you to pick a number of punts with greater comfort.

      Very enjoyable post btw.

      1. Will - Fantasy Football Hub
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Thanks. I probably should have stated it's an estimation - and a rough one. The exact % could be higher OR low than the estimate. If we take the 15man squad - I don't think you could find more than 5 teams that are identical in the top 10k (0.0005%). Add captaincy choice to the mix and the template is very much differential 😉

        No need to look for any punts if you want to climb!

        1. SEASIDER
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          It's interesting how it's split over the squad.

          Based on the most owned players in the top 1k

          Foster, Pantillimon
          Terry, Wisdom, Zabaletta, Bertrand, Hutton
          Hazard, Sanchez, Silva, Siggy, Downing
          Costa, Austin, Kane

          6.4% own all 8 of the attacking players, where as less than 0.05% (could be zero) own all 7 defenders/keepers

          Therefore you could argue that the differential of the template is mostly in your defenders.

          1. SEASIDER
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 3 months ago

            My numbers don't fully reflect the situation though. As defender points are shared (excluding attacking returns and bonus points), you could argue that you should look at teams which own any Chelsea, WBA, Man City, Soton, Villa defenders rather than the individuals above. However, I doubt that there are any high ranking teams with Chelsea, QPR or Spurs forwards that aren't Costa, Austin or Kane.

            Therefore the 6.4% is a more useful indicator of the template's differential status rather than the number calculated for the defenders.

    16. Prof SE
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Unfortunately this is not entirely true. Firstly your 'simple math' isn't quite so simple. It could be the case that the 79% of Costa owners also own Sanchez, Hazard and Kane. Obviously this is extremely unlikely however there is some correlation between ownership of these players. For example, if someone owns Hazard, Sanchez and Costa it is quite likely they will also own Kane because of their budget constraint. The number of top 10k teams that own all four players is anywhere between 79% (assuming all costa owners own the other three) and 50%.

      But I agree about the irritation of people labelling teams 'too template'. The idea of searching for a 'differential' makes no sense. Instead you should simply search for the player(s) that will score the most points given your budget. For instance trading out a high ownership player (Sigurdsson) for a differential (say Moses (0.2%)) offers no benefit unless Moses scores more points than Sigurdsson over the period you own him.

      Just as owning a differential (Moses) allows you to move up the rankings when he scores highly, you will move down the rankings when the template player (Sigurdsson) scores highly.

      1. Will - Fantasy Football Hub
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        I agree that it's not an exact % but the % of top 10k players that own all four could hypothetically be between 0% (not 50) and 79%. Both extremes are highly unlikely. It IS likely to be around 50% - so my simple math gives a good rough estimate without getting into complex probability weighting.

        As others have noted above the figure is 58% in top 1k. Which would fit with 50% top 10k - as top 1k players are more likely to own all four.

        But yes completely agree otherwise with the main point 🙂

    17. OShaughnessy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Hear, hear!

      A very simple bit of math but, a wholly important one in order to understand what's happening in our game.

      That said, I feel there's some merit to throwing in a *proven punt* into our WC squad, mainly one that can double as a nice differential captain's option.

      We've all seen what a timely Costa, Austin, or Aguero hat-trick can do a savvy managers rank...

      So, perhaps there's something to be said about considering a Giroud, Di Maria or Sturridge type player for our teams.

    18. bibi
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Totally agree. Ive been thinking the same. At the End of day we r comparing who can afford to recruit the most top scoring players and usually they are also the most expensive players. So The ability to own both kun and costa without destroYing the rest of your team is a huge advantage against your rival who has lower tv.

    19. RedLightning
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Some players have high ownership among the top 1k players for historical reasons.

      Many of the current top 1k have probably owned Costa from the start - it would be difficult to be in the top 1k if they did not own him in the early weeks.

      But it is not clear-cut that he is still essential - there are alternatives. I expect the top players to split into two camps after they have played their January Wildcards - some will keep Costa and some won't - so there will be more than one template.

      It will be interesting to see what his ownership is when the January Wildcard season is over!

    20. Kalix
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Great post.

      The only thing that matters is scoring the most points, ignore ownership, your rank will improve.

      Ownership only counts for 1v1 mini-leagues or head-to-heads

  7. tisza
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    If Lambert goes to West Brom does he become an interesting differential bearing in mind his last 2 seasons and he'd probably be on pens?

    1. Doolittle
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Yeah I posted this before, certainly one to watch.

    2. Just A Hat
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      bit pricey though

  8. Jonny Bananas
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Team FFS,

    a little help please...

    Heaton

    Terry Clichy Baines (just brought in for 1 week before WC)

    Sanchez Hazard Downing Silva Sterling

    Costa Kane Austin

    Bench: Wisdom Dummett TV 107.8

    Who else do I bench???

    1. Gnu
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Austin & Downing look like your bench fodder depending on fixtures, what a dilemma!
      I see a sneaky Sterling, haven't seen many WC teams with him in.

      Is Jonny your real name?

      1. Jonny Bananas
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Cheers bud...this isn't a WC though...that's just my team...saving wild card until 11.45 approx 31st january!

        Sterling's little holiday helped as downing came in last time with 7 points.

        haha you're enquiring about my first name...it's from Beverly Hills Cop bro

  9. Stannage
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Hi all....Is this wildcard good to go? Do I double up on wba and go with foster and Wisdom or include panty instead
    Foster/ panty...4.0
    Terry. Gardos. Wisdom. Cameron. Wasilevski
    Hazard.Sanchez. adm. Chadli. Boyd.
    Kun. Kane. Costa.
    any thoughts?

  10. davies
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Best team for cleanies over the next 3?

    1. JK - Cønt ⭐
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Hard to look past Saints

    2. Skipdipper
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Saints

    3. Sif
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Also Stoke & Burnley?

    4. littlebig
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Chelsea, Pool, West Brom,

  11. Tim Canterbury
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Who is higher up the pecking order Dzeko or Bony?

    1. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Bony will be.

    2. Skipdipper
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Bony

    3. internal error
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      There would be no point in signing Bony if he were to be below Dzeko in the pecking order

    4. Skipdipper
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      How's he gonna effect Aguero? Less pitch time post European games or pre European games?

    5. littlebig
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Bony will be, assuming he settles ok

  12. Skipdipper
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Wildcard options:

    A.
    Foster Myhill
    Terry Berty BAINES wasi Baird
    SIGGY hazard FABREGAS Sanchez boyd
    Kane Aguero AUSTIN

    B.
    Foster Myhill
    Terry Berty FONTE wasi Baird
    DI MARIA hazard CHADLI Sanchez Boyd
    Kane Aguero GIROUD

    Which would you prefer? Or combination of those in caps

    1. Capt. Krypton
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      A but not overly keen on either

      1. Skipdipper
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        What's the issues?

        1. Capt. Krypton
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Expensive defender.. id downgrade Baines (plenty of decent cheap options) and upgrade Siggy (no Bony for swans anymore, hes carrying an injury in his foot or somit aswell)

    2. Mo Mané Mo Problems
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      A. Maybe. But I'd downgrade Baines and upgrade Siggy.

      B. Giroud/AdM aren't goers imo. Giroud is a liability and minutes are limited a lot - esp with players coming back. AdM is hit and miss, but he usually mishits and scores, so tough.

      1. Skipdipper
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        So I could do adm to Fabregas in B
        And giroud to Austin and have a couple million in the bank for changes?

  13. Hasselbaink Forever - Defoe…
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Anyone going with Fonte over Bert/Clyne, he's comfortably beating both on BAPS

    1. Just A Hat
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Considering it if I need the .1, if not Washing Clyne/Bertie Beetle for me

    2. The Nuttman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Nope, just love attacking full backs.

    3. Skipdipper
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Yup if I go him instead of Baines

    4. Who Ate All Depays?
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      am going with Fonte & Berty

      1. Hasselbaink Forever - Defoe…
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        I'd like to but not sure I can unless I downgrade Chadli to Puncheon, or Costa

    5. JK - Cønt ⭐
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Yup,. I'm on Fonte

      1 goal and he'll be the highest scoring defender

  14. The Nuttman
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Was going to WC GW 23 but currently taking a hit for this GW, do I WC this week to not take a hit assuming I won't take a hit next week if I did?

    1. Dr Dream
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Take the hit...For all you know you could end up with four or five injuries over the following fortnight...

    2. Pasqualinho
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      If you WC now then will your team be different from if you WC next week? If it isn't, then you may as well do it now.

      1. The Nuttman
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Yes it will be.

        1. Pasqualinho
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          Then you should take the hit - don't play your WC on a team that you don't really want.

  15. Jinkys Oars
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Chances Mata could play as many minutes as ADM and outscore him over the next two game weeks?

    1. The Nuttman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      45%

      1. Jinkys Oars
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Any reason for that figure? 🙂

        1. The Nuttman
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          It's roughly even but ADM shades it for me a little just due to previous selection when available.

          1. Jinkys Oars
            • 10 Years
            9 years, 3 months ago

            Yeah ADM has previous stats but can't help thinking that it might take him a week or two to get up to full fitness and Mata is a differential in comparison

  16. Boodey
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    I know My defense is weak but which is better:

    A-Terry,Gardos,Cameron,Baird,Wasil

    B-Jinkinson,Bertie,Cameron,PVA,Wasil

    ????

    1. Doolittle
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      A

      1. Doolittle
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Though that is very stingy 😉

  17. Who Ate All Depays?
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Folks, thoughts on this WC team?

    Pants
    Berty / Fonte / Terry
    Haz / Silva / ADM / Sanchez
    Aguero / Austin / Kane

    (Mccarthy / Wisdom / Wasi / Marney)

  18. Stannage
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Hi all...Already have wisdom in my wildcard team.....Is it worth doubling up wba due to pulis and including foster too?...current keepers r panty and 4.0...wba fixtures look pretty good...thoughts?

    1. Just A Hat
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I'm doing it and I'm quite clever if that helps

    2. Doolittle
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I have Foster and Wisdom.

      1. littlebig
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Me too

    3. Capt. Krypton
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      i went with Lescott last week alongside Wisdom who ive had from the start.. Worked out ok last weekend. going to rotate Lescott/Wisdom with Southhampton defence

  19. Tmel
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Just realised I'm 0.2 short of what I wanted, really regretting not activating my WC on Saturday and getting Kun & ADM in then. Could work around it if I go Krul instead of Panti... thoughts?

    X Hamer
    Terry Wisdom Baird Wasil X
    ADM Hazard Sanchez Boyd X
    Kun Costa Kane

    a) Krul, Clyne & Punch
    b) Panti, PVA/Cameron & Siggy

    1. Koflok
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I dont want to play Punch or Boyd every week

  20. SuperSaiyan
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Hey guys, Who to swap out this week??

    Heaton,
    Hutton, AZPI (inj), Zabaleta
    Downing, Silva, Hazard, Sanchez
    Kane (c), Austin, COSTA.

    Myhill, Wisdom, Bruce, Tiote

    1FT, 4.0itb

    A) Do i swap Azpi -> Iva/Terry
    B) Swap Costa -> Augero
    C) Something else??

    Im thinkign next 2 fixtures for Chelsea aint great, or City for that matter. They play each other... So is it point swapping this?

    I have money to spend... Any other good suggestions??

  21. Henry Hill
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    I know constant wildcard questions are tedious but considering his huge ownership in top 10k am I mad to not have Kane in mine? This is team I think i will go with, what do people think?

    Foster Myhill
    Terry Bertrand Baird Hutton van Aanholt
    Sánchez Hazard Chadli Sigurdsson Boyd
    Agüero Costa Austin

    1. Just A Hat
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I think you've lost the plot

      1. Just A Hat
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        the rest of the team is good though

    2. Doolittle
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I get why you would still want Austin, especially as you have Chadli, but I think Kane is the better option. Not as adamant as some on here will be though,

      1. Henry Hill
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Thanks guys, Kane is playing for much better team and is cheaper but QPR are entirely reliant on Austin for goals and he has been such a reliant option all season so find it hard to sell him. Highest scoring forward I think!

  22. ADucksBehind
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Am I wrong or are City playing Saturday & Sunday?

    1. Game of Stones
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Sunday

    2. Henry Hill
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Just Sunday

      1. ADucksBehind
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Saturday the 24th FA Cup :/ My Mistake

    3. A.T
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I haven't checked but I guarantee you are wrong 😀

    4. Ser Football 42
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Sunday

  23.  ⓖⓐⓩⓩⓐ™
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Heads up for anyone thinking of bringing in Gardos as a saints defender

    http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/11721485.Injury_boost_for_Saints_star/?ref=mac

    1. davies
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      On a WC and getting a placeholder for him... Probably Gardos.

      1. Sess!
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Gardos might only play one game if aldererield recovers quick as expected from the article. GW23 is 1st Feb.....3 weeks after the initial injury.

        1. davies
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          I'll take it.. 😆

    2. Sess!
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Alderwerield firmly on the radar in a few weeks time.

      1. Henry Hill
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Yes he is great value, had a double up with him and Clyne earlier in the season and worked a treat. Hopefully he drops in value while he is injured!

  24. Jinswick
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Best punts for 1 week only before I WC?

    A) Debuchy & Chambers -> Cresswell & Jags
    B) Debuchy & Austin -> Baines & Ings
    C) Silva & Austin -> Albrighton & Kun (Downing off the bench)

    Hart
    Terry, Hutton, Wisdom
    Sanchez, Hazard, Silva, Eriksen
    Costa, Kane, Austin

    Elliot, Downing, Chambers, Debuchy
    Bank 1.4m, 2 FT

    1. The Nuttman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Sakho or Skrtel are best 1 week punt for defenders.

  25. King Nil Miss ✩
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    For those with WC active:

    Hurry up and get 4 City players in your team.

    1. A.T
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      😀

    2. Pasqualinho
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I already have 4 City players.

      But 2 of them are from Leicester.

    3. The Gambler.
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      so pointless, bony cant play for weeks.

      1. King Nil Miss ✩
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        😯

        1. The Gambler.
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          are you fishing? 🙂

          1. King Nil Miss ✩
            • 13 Years
            9 years, 3 months ago

            😉

  26. young_gunner
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Currently 3rd (28 points behind leader) in ML and on my final WC...

    Heaton (Panti)
    Baines Bertrand Terry (Wisdom PVA)
    Hazard Sanchez Silva Downing (Boyd)
    Aguero Austin Kane

    2.3 ITB

    A) Silva & Austin to Chadli & Costa 0.0 ITB
    B) Silva to ADM 1.9 ITB
    C) Terry & Silva to Cresswell & ADM 2.9 ITB (Drop Cresswell next week for Koscielny)
    D) Shut up and sit back

    Thoughts?

  27. asif316uk
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Forster, Hamer
    Terry, Bertrand, Ivanovic, PVA, Wisdom
    Hazard, Sanchez, Silva, Chadli, Albrighton
    Aguero, Kane, Austin

    A - ivanovic + chadli (current)
    B - Cameron + ADM

    Any suggestions on how to improve?
    Chadli or downing this week?

    1. Game of Stones
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      A

      1. Game of Stones
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 3 months ago

        Or not sure if I would double Chelsea, a lot of money tied up in defence.

        1. asif316uk
          • 13 Years
          9 years, 3 months ago

          I've got the ADM dilemma

  28. Game of Stones
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Current defence on WC:
    Panti - Foster
    Bertrand - Terry - Fonte - Wisdom - Wasilewski

    A: Keep it as it is.

    OR

    B: Foster & Fonte -> Krul & Clyne.

  29. The Gambler.
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    If you could pick ANY 3 defenders to play this week only, who would you choose?

    1. Chris_White
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Baines, Terry, Cresswell

    2. King Nil Miss ✩
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Terry- Cresswell - Bertrand

    3. Ser Football 42
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      I'm going with Bertrand-Cresswell-Ivan

  30. _Gunner
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 3 months ago

    Bench two :
    A- Hutton
    B- Wisdom
    C- Berty
    D- Terry

    1. 1zverGGademN
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      Hutton

    2. Sess!
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 3 months ago

      A and B.....why did you even need to ask this question.