Community Submissions

All In A Spin: The Teams Most and Least Likely To Rotate

With the Fantasy Premier League (FPL) recently relaunched for the new season, the planning has begun. Foremost in the thoughts of FPL managers is conjecture as to where the best value lays and who is a ‘nailed on’ starter. Unfortunately, with so many players in contention and new transfers coming in, it can be difficult to predict who a club’s favoured XI will be.

Recently I carried out  some research into the relationship between FPL starting price and point-scoring potential for the season and from the outset I noted that £121.1m in value was lost from the player lists over the course of the 2014/15 season. The explanation for this is that only a relatively small proportion of players in the list will play regularly, much less generate significant FPL points. As form ebbs and flows throughout the season, FPL managers veer from one top performer to the next, with teams becoming more homogenised as we progress. As a select few players see their value increase, the majority will decrease as their net transfers per week fall into the minus figures.

The best chance of accumulating FPL points is picking players who are playing. This is obvious, but in the era of squad rotations, identifying guaranteed starters for reasonable money is a challenge. I have looked at the final 12 games of last season to see whether these can shed some light on Premier League managers’ confidence and comfort with their squads. The theory goes that if a manager is predisposed to tinker, then rotation of the FPL assets is more likely, so it could pay to look at the teams which were settled, for whom mild evolution over the summer is more probable than revolution. Obviously this is a not a “fool proof” methodology, because injuries, fatigue and suspensions will force a club’s hand, so I have tried to mitigate this by looking primarily at the number of players to complete at least 60 minutes in nine of the final 12 games (75%) relative to the number of players at club involved over this time. Note: last season’s relegated teams have been excluded from this analysis.

Settled Line-Ups

The model of consistency towards the end of the season was Tony Pulis’ West Brom. In the final 12 games they provided the lowest number of players to experience time on the pitch with just 19. More impressively still, they registered the joint-highest number of players to pick up two appearance points for playing 60 or minutes in at least 75% of the final games (ten players). This represents 53% of their involved playing squad. They were particularly settled in midfield, with five of these ten – Chris Brunt, Claudio Yacob, Craig Gardner, Darren Fletcher and James Morrison – plying their trade in the middle of the park. Pulis’ recruitment of James McClean from Wigan is the only factor which could potentially disrupt this midfielder consistency.

Four teams followed, with 20 players involved in the final 12 games. Arsenal and Stoke matched West Brom for consistency of line-up, with ten players all featuring heavily in the final dozen games, representing 50% of their involved playing squad. In the case of Stoke, this is perhaps not surprising when we consider they have the joint-smallest squad involvement over the course of the season; just 23 players were considered good enough to represent the Potters, meaning they were perhaps forced into a settled line-up through lack of options although this may be doing Mark Hughes’ squad building talents an injustice. He has been busy in the transfer market thus far, although only Joselu and Markio van Ginkel look set to really contend for regular starts, but with the returning Bojan Krkic and Marc Muniesa, as well as the departing Steven N’Zonzi there is potential for disruption at the Britannia Stadium.

By contrast Arsenal is stereotyped as having a large squad with too many options, particularly in midfield. It is true that over the season only two teams utilized more players, but as with West Brom and Stoke, five of their ten regular starters in the final weeks were from midfield; Aaron Ramsey, Alexis Sanchez, Santi Cazorla, Mesut Ozil and Francis Coquelin. This suggests that the midfield dilemma is perhaps not as great as we may think. Arsene Wenger found consistency in his line-up as the team hit form at the end of the season, which should only be disturbed by £9.0m midfielder Theo Walcott this season, although he is likely to be more of a threat to forward Oliver Giroud.

Southampton and West Ham also used only 20 players in the final weeks, but these are not likely to prove useful guides for the coming season. West Ham has recruited a new manager, several new players to date, and supposedly a new attacking philosophy. It is also probable that their early Europa League qualifying games are going to provide much of a template for the season, with numerous youngsters being called upon. Southampton’s consistency in an impressive campaign was largely attributed to the defence, but with Fraser Forster and Ryan Bertrand injured for the start of the season, and with Toby Alderweireld and Nathaniel Clyne both having departed and strong rumours of Morgan Schneiderlin to follow, the template for Saints will have to be rethought by Ronald Koeman.

A mention should also go to Tottenham. After a season that featured a Europa League campaign and Mauricio Pochettino’s high pressing style, the end of the season brought some visible signs of fatigue as the team stumbled across the line. However, in spite of this, five players completed at least 60 minutes in each of the final 12 games: Harry Kane, Christian Eriksen, the versatile Eric Dier, Nabil Bentaleb and Nacer Chadli. If Dier can survive the defensive overhaul at White Hart Lane, these five should be starters for Spurs in the new season, with the £4.5m Bentaleb offering fantasy potential as the cheap fifth midfielder.

Unsettled Line-Ups

Nobody said the rebuilding job at Old Trafford would be easy, and evidence suggests that Louis van Gaal might still be trying to get the best out of his Manchester United squad. The first team at least held some consistency at the end of the season, with nine players getting maximum appearance points regularly (38% of the involved players), but on the fringes of the squad there was much rotation; 24 players were involved for Man Utd in the final dozen games, the joint-highest in the league. The pattern is consistent throughout the season, with the club utilizing 30 players since GW1, also a joint-high for the league. High profile arrivals of Memphis Depay and Bastian Schweinsteiger and a lack of transfers out (Robin van Persie to Fenerbahce pending at time of writing) suggest that this rotation and tinkering is not yet at an end.

The other team to rotate heavily in the last games was Swansea; only 29% of the large involved squad of 24 players were utilized regularly. Injuries and suspensions definitely seemed to hinder the Swans late in the season, highlighted by Garry Monk’s comments following the 1-0 win away at Arsenal: “We didn’t have a fit striker to choose from the start”. Certainly, the likes of Bafetimbi Gomis would have been an ever-present were it not for injury. That said, there does appear to be evidence of rotation, with Jack Cork the only outfield player to feature prominently in each of the final 12 games, missing only 36 minutes of the last 1,080.

Liverpool utilized 22 players in the final dozen games, which was about halfway between the top and bottom of the rankings. However, only six players recorded the maximum bonus points in at least nine of the last 12 games (27% of the involved squad), the joint-lowest in the league. Brendan Rogers was roundly criticised at the end of the season for his inconsistency, and the data reflects this, with his starting line-up changing dramatically in the season’s final straight. With the addition of many (seemingly) squad players so far – only James Milner and Roberto Firmino look like first-choice players at this stage – this situation may not change in the short term. Interestingly, Rogers did most of his tinkering to personnel before the game, as the club recorded one of the lowest number of substitutions (29) in this period, indicating to more in-game reluctance than most managers.

The biggest concern about guaranteed starters based on the back-end of last season from a fantasy perspective is Aston Villa. Following Tim Sherwood’s appointment in February he chopped and changed his team, utilizing 23 different players (only Man Utd and Swansea used more) and only six of these players (26% of the involved squad) completed 60 minutes in 75% of the games. Further, only two of these players – Christian Benteke and Fabian Delph – completed 60 minutes in all of the last 12 matches. With both of these players linked with moves away before the end of the transfer window, predicting Villa’s starting line-up could potentially become even trickier.

21 Comments Post a Comment
  1. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Great research. Arsenal are the key one to watch here. They let me down badly in Gameweek 38 last season with rotation, but it looks like on the whole they were a very settled side. Be good if ManU can get a settled side together. Rotation, changing formation and positions ruined them last season as a Fantasy prospect.

  2. Bolivian Seaman
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Markio van Ginkel , will he playing in the N'Zonzi role?

    1. Ruth_NZ
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      Looks likely but he gets box to box, doesn't sit as much as N'Zonzi.

  3. dribbler
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    this is very helpful thanks shoemaker...much appreciated...a bit cheeky of me but is there any chance you could go through the other 7 teams?

    1. Mathematically Safe
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      To be honest, there was nothing that really jumped out about the other teams, otherwise I would have gone with a 'by club' format. They all sit somewhere between very settled and rotating. But I'll take a look through again and let you know if anything useful can be useful

  4. Twelve years a slave
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    I cant believe you have Swansea in the unsettled lineup department. Having injuries, and nothing to play for were the reasons for the late season rotations.
    They are one of the more settled sides in the didpvision, and their transfer policy should be a lesson to the likes of Liverpool.
    Every player they have bought in has made a positive contribution, and has been a very gradual proces. The team hasnt been torn to shepreds by large numbers out like Southampton etc.

    They are one of the easier teams to predict in terms of lineup

    1. J0E
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      You'd think that but Doosra the other day was saying Rangel was a sure starter. I say not. But I'm not entirely sure which of us is right.

      Also in midfield Sigurdsson is a sure starter, but Routledge I'm less sure on. Dyer even less sure. I think there's quite a lot of mystery still to the Swansea line up. Will Ayew defnitely play every week? If so who makes way?

      Monk also has shown he is able to adapt to opposition, something Wenger rarely does hence the lack of rotation amongst Arsenal players.

      Anyway that's my take on it.

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        If we think the defence is Naughton Williams Fernandez and Taylor that leave six more outfield spots. So we can be safe that Gomis gets one spot and Sigurdsson another so that leaves just four remaining spots...but Ki, Cork, Shelvey, Ayew Routledge, Montero all have a realistic claim to be a first team player. Two will be disappointed and be rotated. And that doesn't even factor in the possibility of Dyer getting the odd game.

        1. JK - Cønt ⭐
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          Even Taylor isn't assured

          They have signed Tabanou

          who can also play in midfield, complicating things further

        2. Ruth_NZ
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          Ki, Ayew and Shelvey are all pretty nailed. They may still add a DM, otherwise Cork probably.

    2. Ruth_NZ
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      I think I agree with you about Ki. I expected him to be priced higher. There are four or five decent options at 5.5.

      1. Mathematically Safe
        • 8 Years
        8 years, 9 months ago

        "There are four or five decent options at 5.5."

        Can I ask who you are thinking of? That position is driving me mad.

        Considering the opening six weeks only, I'm stuck between Larsson and Mahrez, although both have their drawbacks. Instinctively I like Ki, but I'm not convinced is a nailed on starter despite his good season, and at Villa Grealish has only shown a brief amount of form at the end of the season. Considering what I've written about the unpredictability of Sherwood's line-up above, and the prospect that Grealish might - MIGHT - be over-hyped, I'm having a pretty hard time with that position.

        1. Ruth_NZ
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 9 months ago

          Seeing that it's you and you bother to write articles... Ki, Atsu, Van Ginkel, Johnson (Norwich) and Redmond all have good prospects. Van Ginkel may be the best of them but Atsu is way better than most on here realise and Johnson scores his fair share too.

          Redmond is more punty but he's improving quite fast. Ki might have been lucky scoring so many last season, alternatively he may have the knack (like Lampard) of timing his arrival in the box. I think more likely the latter.

          I wouldn't object to having any of those as long as you let me pick the fixture sequences.

          1. Ruth_NZ
            • 9 Years
            8 years, 9 months ago

            PS Norwich have a good first 5 weeks, Bournemouth and Stoke have a good first 8 weeks. Swansea's opening fixtures are a bit mixed.

            1. Mathematically Safe
              • 8 Years
              8 years, 9 months ago

              Much appreciated.

              Respectively disagree re: Van Ginkel and Stoke because they are playing three of last year's top six in the first six weeks. Sure he's a good player, but might wait a few weeks. Already stated my concern / uncertainty over Swansea and Ki, although still could be tempted just because I like him. Atsu, Johnson and Redmond I agree with, but I already have Howson and Wilson from Norwich and Bournemouth and not really prepared to double up at this stage whilst they are newcomers.

              As a member of the Northampton alumni, I might yet bring in Bradley Johnson through pure favoritism. Can't see that being a bad strategy at all...

              1. Ruth_NZ
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 9 months ago

                Stoke's fixtures look fine to me from an attacking point of view. Of the first 8 only Arsenal away is daunting. Liverpool are not a great defensive team and neither are Spurs. In addition they have Villa, Bournemouth, Leicester and Norwich in there.

                A 5.5 mid doesn't need to get assists/goals in every game. As long as they get one goal and one assist in every 5 or 6 games plus the odd clean sheet point and BP you are doing fine.

                1. Mathematically Safe
                  • 8 Years
                  8 years, 9 months ago

                  That's a fair point, although I'd still prefer to avoid Spurs and Liverpool. I think on balance Larsson (set pieces) and Mahrez (advanced position) have better fixtures for the first few weeks. Of course I'm fully prepared to be proven wrong once the season kicks off.

    3. Mathematically Safe
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 9 months ago

      I did make mention in both the introduction and the Swansea paragraph that injuries definitely play a part. That said, they did have a full 24 players utilized in the last 12 games, which was the highest in the division with Man U. Of course, these numbers are open to interpretation. I'm sure there was an element of experimentation involved, but that only enhances the fact we don't really know what Monk is thinking before the start of this season.

      I agree with Jonty that most of their squad is subject to rotation. Fabianski, Williams, Fernandez, Sigurdsson and Gomis I'd bet on, and probably Cork too considering his consistency at the end of the season, but that leaves a lot of strong candidates for a few positions.

      You're right that their transfer policy is strong, but they do have a bottleneck of players all worthy of first team places as a result of it.

  5. Sharkytect
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Fantastic article. Nice one, Shoemaker

  6. beepingmeeping
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Great article

  7. LordHeskey
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 9 months ago

    Thoughts would be greatly appreciated
    Butland //Schmeicel
    Ivan // O'Shea // Collocini // Williams // Mert
    Hazard // Hendo // Zaha // Chadli // Ki Sung
    Kane // Rooney // Pelle