Members
8 August 2017 4937 comments
Prokoptas Prokoptas
Share:

The Technical Area makes a return for the new season and I’m delighted to have joined the Fantasy Football Scout writing team to bring this to you.

These articles will mainly be available for members following Gameweek 1 but, for my debut, I offer a preview of what is to come with some analysis of Sunday’s Wembley showpiece.

The final domestic appetiser to the upcoming season, Sunday’s Community Shield between champions Chelsea and FA Cup winners Arsenal proved a sedate affair that will perhaps be remembered more for the involvement of referee Bobby Madley than any single player’s contribution.

Nonetheless, as our last chance to observe two high-profile Premier League sides in action before the Gameweek 1 deadline – and with many popular FPL assets presumed to participate – interest from the Fantasy community was understandably high.

With only the one game to analyse this week, we’ll be focusing our attention on the performances of two newly-signed Arsenal players who put forward interesting, if very different, showings on the field.

Sead KolaŔinac

We’ll start with Sead KolaÅ”inac, whose afternoon threatened to be something of a non-event after he was named among the substitutes to open the match. A nasty head injury to Per Mertesacker on the half-hour mark, however, gave the Bosnian his chance to shine; an opportunity he seized with both hands.

Though pre-season projections had earmarked KolaÅ”inac to compete for a spot as a left-wing back in Arsenal’s 3-4-2-1 system, Wenger’s substitution saw the Bosnian fielded as a left-sided central defender alongside Nacho Monreal and Rob Holding.

Typically, we would have expected this more defensive positioning to have impinged upon KolaÅ”inac’s chances to get forward in support of the Arsenal attack. Yet analysing our game data, we can observe that KolaÅ”inac was frequently occupying space upon the left-flank, consistently drifting out to the touchline to receive possession:

Kolasinac – Passes Received
members



This profile translates much more readily to the heatmap of a traditional left wing-back than that of a centre half. In fact, it is eerily reminiscent of the performance and positioning of another left-sided wide player participating in Sunday’s match:

Kolasinac vs Alonso – Touches
members

Given Alonso’s barnstorming FPL campaign in 2016/17, KolaÅ”inac’s tendencies to occupy the same attacking space – even in spite of his ostensibly more defensive position – bodes well for his likelihood of producing attacking returns heading into the new season.

The defender also demonstrated an ability to pose a threat on the end of set-pieces, notching Arsenal’s equaliser by rising to divert Granit Xhaka’s cross into the net.

The underlying numbers for KolaŔinac were promising too. Despite playing only limited minutes, the defender produced 17 passes in opposition territory (with a 100% success rate), including five in the final third. These compared favourably to those of Alonso (10, 5) and Victor Moses (12, 7).

It should be noted that Hector Bellerin – playing on the right-hand flank of Arsenal’s formation – outshone even KolaÅ”inac in this regard, with 29 passes in the opposing half and 21 in the danger zone, while he created two excellent goalscoring opportunities in the process.

Such a performance demonstrates the attacking potential of the wing-back position within Arsenal’s current set-up and underlines the tantalising prospects of either player as an FPL asset moving forward.

KolaÅ”inac also put in an impressive defensive performance, winning all three of his tackles and racking up five recoveries – traits which would translate well into FPL’s Bonus Point System (BPS).

Alexandre Lacazette

In contrast to KolaÅ”inac’s impressive debut, Lacazette cut a significantly less imposing figure during Sunday’s match-up.

Often isolated in space against Chelsea’s trio of centre backs, Lacazette amassed just 24 touches during his disappointing 66-minute spell – fewer than any other starter. Of these, far too many were found by dropping deep into space ahead of Chelsea’s backline, from which he was quickly smothered by defensive pressure.

Lacazette – Touches
members



The Frenchmen displayed occasional glimpses of his attacking prowess. On two or three occasions, Lacazette found himself in dangerous positions; only for Chelsea’s defensive line to close on him before he had a chance to capitalise.

His brightest moment came in the first-half, when he was able to free himself on the edge of the penalty area and curl an early shot against the post. Yet this effort would prove to be Lacazette’s only goal attempt of the match and he would be replaced shortly after the hour mark by Olivier Giroud (who himself failed to make much of an impression, albeit in limited time).

The usual caveats apply here, of course – this was only a single match, and consequently it is certainly much too early for us to jump to any definitive conclusions about Lacazette’s Fantasy prospects for the coming year. For the record, I am optimistic of his season-long goalscoring potential, as are our Rate My Team projections.

It is similarly important to note that Arsenal were missing the combined creative impetus of Mesut Ɩzil, Alexis Sanchez and Aaron Ramsey for this fixture – players who would have both demanded defensive attention and worked to produce more threatening through-balls to the striker.

Nonetheless, even after claiming his first trophy as a member of Arsene Wenger’s squad, this was likely not a match that Lacazette will want to remember.

4,937 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Marty McFly
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Thoughts appreciated...

    A) Jesus + Alli + Zaha
    B) Kane + Coutinho + JWP

    Already have KDB for City coverage.

  2. Hesoyam
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    A 5.5 or 5 defender except Deniels and Southampton,Spurs and westbrom defenders?

    1. Bubbles1985
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Stones

    2. drughi
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      dann/stones

    3. Karan_G14
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Stones, PVA, Darmian

  3. as33
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    RTM please:
    Hart/Elliot
    Alonso/Davies/Cedric/Rosenior/Hanley
    KDB/Willian/Zaha/Atsu/Loftus-Cheek
    Kane/Kaku/Firmino
    Any good?

    1. DA Minnion (Former great)
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Glad to see Alonso. He seems too expensive for most this season.

  4. Cooper123
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Assuming the faith in Fraser is underpinned by Stanislas being injured: how long is Stanislas out for?

    1. Doosra - ☭BowenOfRice☭
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      It isn't. I have got Fraser for himself. Nothing to do with Stanislas.

  5. stachman
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Still have't decided:

    DDG, Elliot
    Kola, Kompany, ***, ***, Hunemeier
    Alli, Mane, JWP, ***, Carroll
    Lukaku, Jesus, Benteke

    A) Cedric/Yosh, Dummett, Ritchie
    B) Bertrand, Dann, Atsu

    B far more punty, but I like my defence so much this way...

  6. Frank Koscielny
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    A. Zaha + Firmino
    B. Mané + J.Rod/Mounie

    1. Marty McFly
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      B with JRod for me.

      1. Frank Koscielny
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Cheers, Marty

    2. Invincibles
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      A surely

      1. Avo24
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        A more secure but B can give u more points, for me i like the secure one

  7. Invincibles
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Which 3 to complete my team?

    A) Cedric, Alli, Jesus,
    B) Bertrand, Zaha, Kane

    rest of my team

    Foster, Elliott
    Kolas Ake TFM Long
    KDB Willian Fraser RLC
    Lukaku Firmino

    1. Frank Koscielny
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      B

  8. Daniel Exeter
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Pages flying.

    1. THE SHEEP HUNTERS
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      C)

    2. All Hail K
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 17 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      lol. I just responded to someone and it's already two pages ago!

  9. Marty McFly
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Repost - bottom of last page... Thoughts appreciated...

    A) Jesus + Alli + Zaha
    B) Kane + Coutinho + JWP

    Already have KDB for City coverage.

    1. THE SHEEP HUNTERS
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Double City A)

  10. jay01
    • 12 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Best strikers 7 mil and under?

  11. ā˜…Kunthemanā˜…
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Really tempted to do Forster>Pickford. Everton have a pretty solid defense and Pickford saves everything thrown at him...could get some double digit hauls with those "nightmare" fixtures

    1. stachman
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Good point... Those 3 away matches kept me away from any Toffie player, but Pickford can be a completely different story...

  12. SlumdogMignolet22
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Lacazett or Jesus?

    1. thepeen555
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      got both - otherwise jesus on his own - MCFC will score more than Arsenal as a whole

    2. Marty McFly
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Not even a close call IMO!

      1. SlumdogMignolet22
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        So, jesus then? Lacca looka weak

        1. Marty McFly
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Yeh I think so

    3. Legohair
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Jesus,because özil and sanchez is out

  13. Rupert The Horse
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Morning.
    Blimey, 24 touches from Lacazette. Poor.

    1. THE SHEEP HUNTERS
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Some were good touches

    2. Doosra - ☭BowenOfRice☭
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Interesting. šŸ™‚

    3. GoonerByron
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I think Leicester at home should be completely different to a first choice Chelsea back 5 at Wembley though..

    4. Hairy Potter
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Would be interesting to see how many touches someone like Romario used to have in a game. Could be a fuzzy memory, but seem to remember seeing games where he didn't get involved, but would still pop up and score. Not that I'm saying Lacazette is as good as Romario.

  14. Daniel Exeter
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Jesus

    10 PL games
    24 attempts
    7 goals
    4 assists

  15. johnnybeefcake
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Choose one team ( This will be my final team i NEED HELP)

    A) Foster

    Danilo Stephens Daneis

    Mane KDB Zaha Willian

    Kane Lukaku Mounie

    B) Foster

    TAA Stephens Daniels

    Mane Alli KDB Milivojevic

    Kane Lukaku Mounie

    1. stachman
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      No bench, no reply...

      1. johnnybeefcake
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        based off the starting 11

    2. Krionos
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      A. Seems more balanced. I'm personally not a fan of super budget defenses. THink that defenders will score well this season.

  16. Kabayan
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    A. Salah + KDB
    Or
    B. Eriksen + Mane
    Thanks

    1. Karan_G14
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I'm on A. But B could easily outscore that.

      This is too tough.

      1. Kane Toads
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        So Mane +KDB could see monster hauls then?

    2. Frank Koscielny
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      A provided you have Kane as a forward

      1. Kane Toads
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Yep

  17. Karan_G14
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Best 4.5 GK?

    A) Foster
    B) Begovic
    C) Hart

    Thinking Hart is the best option as WBA & BOU have better options in defence.

    Appreciate your thoughts!

    1. Squashed
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      a

      1. Karan_G14
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        West Brom are all over the place.

    2. stachman
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      A just for fixtures and Tony Pulis

      1. Karan_G14
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Not sure if that's really the way to go. Foster is not looking like a good option imo.

        1. stachman
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Well - you asked for my thought šŸ˜‰

        2. Squashed
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          swap for Southampton def if u can.
          b and c will find life hard keeping cleanies.

    3. Hesoyam
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      A

    4. GPV
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Hart would be my last pick of the 3.. at least till the firm up at the back. They give away goals for fun.

      I'd go Begovic as WBA also look a bit shaky

  18. Squashed
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    which?
    holding or bert.

    1. Karan_G14
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Bert

  19. What is a Fantasy Island Risk?
    J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 17 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Fantasy Football Scout daily hot topic

    What is a Fantasy Island Risk?

    We are looking for your help to define a Fantasy Island Risk, for this element of the Scoutcast - where we select a player that is going under the radar but has the potential to do well in the upcoming Gameweek.

    We are not looking for your picks as such - more a definition of the sort of player that should be allowed to be picked and those that shouldn't. If you do suggest a player please give reasons why they are a good Fantasy Island Risk.

    For some this should be a genuine risk - involving a player that is few teams and is not considered a heavy hitter. My pick of Leroy Fer for GWK 1 I think fits this bill nicely. He has a tricky fixture - but could do well.

    For some its simply about ownership - which is why Luke picked Vardy....who is in v few teams, faces Arsenal but is arguably one of FPL's best players in recent seasons.

    What do you think - what should the definition of a Fantasy Island Risk be?

    1. ā˜…Kunthemanā˜…
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Pogba šŸ˜‰

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 17 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        We are not looking for your picks as such - more a definition of the sort of player that should be allowed to be picked and those that shouldn't. If you do suggest a player please give reasons why they are a good Fantasy Island Risk.

        1. ā˜…Kunthemanā˜…
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          If you look ten pages on this forum and your risk isn't mentioned more than 5 times, that's an island. Like Vardy, Fer.

          Mine might be Pickford. No one likes being alone on an island though.

    2. FFPro
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I don't think you can go by ownership, maybe give the other Scoutcast members power of veto

    3. THE SHEEP HUNTERS
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Isaac Success. (Bookmark This)

    4. GPV
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Gabbiadini

    5. Rover
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Someone who would raise eyebrows in RMTs. Someone who just divides opinion like Pogba/JRod/Ramsey wouldn't count but I'd go with saying that it should be a player who if I see in a RMT I'd have to check again if I'm seeing it right. Sadly this is a wholly subjective definition.

      1. Rover
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        e.g. I'd go with Mirallas for GW1

    6. Gregor
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Both fine choices, I don't think it would be acceptable to pick Vardy if he was playing home to someone like Brighton though, even if his ownership was still small.

    7. Galza
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I've gone Jon Walters. Reckon there's plenty of points on offer there. Especially if he plays as second striker šŸ˜‰

      1. Hairy Potter
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        He always seems to do something against Chelsea as well.

        1. Galza
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Just think he's being completely over looked. He's on like 0.5 ownership as well. Anyway not going to say to much more about it. Want to keep him all to myself

        2. UshFPL
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Like 2 own goals and a missed penalty

    8. Krionos
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Is it not a combination of both? At the moment I would say that Sanchez is a risk!! And yet he could well be on the bench on Friday and score well with a late substitution.

      Completely overlooked and has very low ownership...

    9. RubeRx
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Must be playing away with less than 5% own

      Someone like Ince

    10. Emiliano Sala
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Pogba is a real risk. What do you think of pogba jonty?

    11. DA Minnion (Former great)
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      It should be a player that's about to explode this year that hasn't before in season's gone by. I'm hoping Matt Ritchie is that player.

    12. Oven Glover
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      It's not a risk taking a punt on a cheap player who ends up doing nothing imo. The real risk for me going into this gw is that I don't have the highest owned player, and standout captain option for his home game against the Hammers. Now, that's a risk.

    13. Cooper123
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      As for the definition (which everyone seems to have ignored haha): I would say, under 5% ownership.

      The complaint on the ScoutCast was that Vardy wasn't a risk because he tore the league up two years ago. The simple fact is that if people thought he would do it again this year, he would be selected by more, and he wouldn't be a differential.

      It doesn't make sense to me for past pedigree to come into it. The only objective measure of a risk is driven by the market: percentage ownership. Otherwise how far back in history do you look? Is Rooney not a risk because he was great at United many moons ago?

      If Vardy were not a risky pick, regardless of history, his ownership would be higher than the threshold. Simple as that.

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 17 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        But Vardy also tore it up at the end of last season and in pre-season while playing for a side that was champions.

        If Vardy's fixtures weren't so poor over the first few he'd be in my side - great 8.5 option.

        He just doesn't seem that risky to me for one match v Arsenal.

        ownership is about lots of things - includin fixtures over time and form.

        The FI risk is about a risk for that specific gameweek. Given Arsenal's tendency to concede I'm not sure he is a risk for that match in isolation

    14. Karibu
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      what do you guys think about the 5-3-2?
      5 solid defenders (top 5)
      kane and lukaku in the front
      KDB with two 6m mids and two 4.5 mids

      A) will it work this year?
      B) will it work for the first 6 GWs

    15. Mavric Marco
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      My criteria would be a simple rule of 3:

      - Someone you would NEVER consider for your own team, EVER
      - Not on ‘The Watchlist’ or top of FFS tables
      - Under 9.0 (any position)

      1. La Décima Chaser
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        I think these are relatively good criteria to use! I may also include that the player has to be projected below a certain figure on the RMT tool. Below 3.50 points projected for that week for example.

    16. alfoir
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      For me, a Fantasy Island Risk would be someone who could play in the first couple of gameweeks only because an assured starting isn't fully match fit / is injured. A bit of a punt that could earn some points and increase that all-important team value.

      In particular, Alexander-Arnold at Liverpool or Pied at Southampton - although the latter looks less likely now that Cedric has a pre-season game under his belt.

    17. Gooner Kebab
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Fantasy Island

    18. Bald Eagle
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Something to think about before selecting a Fantasy Island Risk player, not that this is a definition of any kind.

      -someone who isn't nailed on to always play more than 60 minutes (rotation risk),
      -plays in a position that doesn't automatically translate goals/assists (defender/central midfielder, GK, mids and forwards from top teams that are on the bench for most of the game and only get cameos, and all mids/forwards that are not in top 10 on the table),
      -has never been top five FPL points scorer in his position in previous years. (bar the ones who are at the end of their careers)
      -differential (less than 5% ownership would be great but not always needed if he plays for a team that isn't in top 10 on the table).

      I'm sure there are more ideas we can come up with. It's hard to have a short definition when there are so many exceptions.

    19. The Rumour Mill
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Under 5% ownership

    20. the Penman
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      - Low ownership (less than 5%)
      - No notable form (i.e. Isn't on a hot streak in past 2 weeks)
      - Not in any of the Scoutcast's team

      1. DantheManinaPan
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        My fave definition

    21. Bird Raymond
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Needs a strict definition i.e. below a certain price and below a certain ownership.
      I think above a certain price players are proven and the feature is good to identify players we perhaps hadn't considered, such as Fer, but might consider taking a punt on.

    22. President Giggs
      • 13 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I think there should be two simple criteria:
      - Under 5% ownership
      - Not in anyone on the scoutcast's team

      And perhaps a third:
      - Not in the current top 6 teams in the league

      1. andy85wsm
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        I like the first 2 here, nice and simple.

        1. Az
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 17 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Me too

        2. Ryan
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Big fan of the first 2 as well

    23. GreenWindmill
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I think it should be a combination of factors. Something like the player must satisfy at least 3 of the following 4 conditions:
      * Be a non-premium asset (below £7.5m)
      * Not be the main FPL asset at the club
      * Have a tough fixture
      * Have low ownership (8% or less)

      Haven't really thought that through fully but I reckon that would box the candidates in reasonably well.

      1. andy85wsm
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        I don't think price should be taken into account. There are times when Daniel Sturridge could be a genuine risk! šŸ™‚

        1. GreenWindmill
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 15 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          As long as he satisfied the other criteria he would qualify though. Like I say, haven't fully thought it through...

    24. Red Wasabi
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Rondon. Low ownership2.2%, great fixtures on the ticker. Starter. Started strong in the beginning of last season. Main aerial threat for West Brom.

    25. Qubit
      • 17 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I think Vardy is fine as a risk pick. He's low owned, Leicester didnt do great last season and probably wont this season either, but he's capable of grabbing a brace (question is he a risky pick for your FPL team - id say yes!).

      Otherwise we have to ask what is the point in a fantasy island risk - to pick a lowly priced, lowly owned, likely crappy player in the hope that they might do something? I don't get it. I do agree that it would be wise to set some criteria though.

    26. electrue
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I'd sort the criteria in the following order:
      - Less than X% ownership
      - Fixture difficulty
      - Rotation/Low minutes risk
      - Not in others team
      - Low price

      and if 3/5 apply for a certain player he is a fantasy island risk.

    27. Celt Abroad
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Under 5 per cent ownership.

    28. IRBOX ⚽
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      < 6.0 attacking player in my opinion. Always going to be a risk at this price

    29. The Overthinker
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Imo it's about the players who are mentioned very less. Like vardy. We know he can give points, and in that bracket I don't think anyone is as good as him

    30. Ryan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Its difficult to define it in GW1 because a proper established order hasn't occurred yet. I suspect that those below 5% once the season is under way would be a genuine fantasy Island risk.

    31. CL4PTRAP
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I think we should just focus on ownership %. Otherwise, it gets too complicated.

    32. TokyoRisingSun
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      IMO a Fantasy Island risk should fulfil some or all of the following criteria:

      a) Inconsistent
      b) Not 100% nailed
      c) low ownership

      My example of such a player for GW1 would be Olivier Giroud. He isn't the main striker at Arsenal, yet you'd fancy him to come off the bench at some point. And he certainly has the capability to score a brace against Leicester. Yet he's a risk because, as mentioned, he isn' a starter. But potentially rewarding if you nail it.

      Price should not be a factor because there are some expensive players who fall into this category as well. However I believe that ownership must always play a factor at some point - it simply isn't a risk to pick someone like Lukaku, irrespective of form, if his ownership is 30% etc.

    33. GreenWindmill
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      For me, differential =/= risk.

      If we go that simple then Pedro (3.8%) playing in a front 3 at home to Burnley is a risk. It has to be more nuanced than that.

      1. andy85wsm
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Should be renamed from fantasy island risk, that would solve everything šŸ™‚

      2. Le Blues
        • 12 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        But Pedro isnt playing in a front 3 is he. The only legit option in my mind for the RWB slot.

    34. firetog
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Less than 5% ownership.

      Forwards under 7m
      Mids under 6m
      Defenders and goal keepers under 5m

      Must be playing away from home unless playing one of the following (ARS, CHE, EVE, LIV, MCI, MUN, TOT)

      1. firetog
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        An example for this week could be
        Hart away to United
        Newcastle defender home to spurs
        Fer away to Swansea.
        Deeney home to liverpool

        1. firetog
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          * Fer away to Southampton

    35. FPLzebub
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Anyone under 5% ownership. Keep it simple. Same rules for all. Also rotate who picks first.

    36. Alchim1sT
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      i'd go for Mounie in GW1 - it's the honeymoon period for new PL Teams and Palace was always good for a leak in defence! He is acutally owned by less than 1% at the moment. Plus he had a decent preseason!

    37. RedLightning
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Under 5% ownership, and someone that none of the other members of the Scoutcast team had seriously considered for their current squad.

    38. Unimaginative
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      A Fantasy Island Risk should be a player who;
      -is owned by less than 5% of players
      -has not finished in the top 5 for their position in the previous 2 seasons
      -has not had a score of more than 4 points

      1. Unimaginative
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        4 points per game in their previous 4 matches
        - has not received any bonus points in their previous 4 matches

    39. Spokey
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Moreno, Iwobi and Lowe. Have all in my team.

    40. Malcolm Tucker for England …
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      low ownership, low relative price, people unaware of their potential.
      Key definition for me is that their ownership is likely to go through the roof if they have one good performance bringing them to people's attention

      I give you...Kachunga.
      6.0 mid, classified as forward in every other game, good pre-season, favourable fixtures

      1. Andy_Social
        • 14 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Your ideal Fantasy Island pick should be the player who is a darling of casuals, high ownership in FPL but utter anathema to FFS writers, posters and RMTs.

        Examples that spring to mind are Luiz, Matic, Rooney, Courtois.

    41. Ballroom Jam
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Certainly ownership is the main criterion.
      Maybe include form (say less 15 points in last 5 gameweeks) but that doesn't apply at start of season.

    42. dimitros
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I have no Spurs player.

  20. GPV
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Is Darmian nailed on for league starts?

    1. Karan_G14
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      You'd think so for the start.

      1. GPV
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Thanks

    2. Invincibles
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      yes for at least a month

  21. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    DDG, Heaton or Pickford?

    Could use the extra 0.5. Was on DDG but the scoutcast has got me wondering...

    1. Judders
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Dont touch Pickford anyway. Those opening fixtures for Everton are vile

      1. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Thoughts on Heaton?

        1. Judders
          • 9 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          At 4.5 last season Heaton was a fantastic bargain but this season at 5 I dont think he offers anywhere near the same value. Keane is gone so I dont think there will be as many CS. Also after watching the Scoutcast Jonty highlighted that Heaton had the best ever GK performance for Bonus and I think saves caught. I have doubts as to whether hr can replicate that this season and for .5 more I shall be avoiding.

          1. Klopptomist Scott Jelly
            • 9 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            Fair enough, thanks for your thoughts. Might start with DDG and switch to Heaton if he (and Burnley DEF) looking good/need funds elsewhere

            1. Judders
              • 9 Years
              9 years, 1 month ago

              No problem. Im currently on Forster in goal because of the fixtures and I dont know who will be nailed in defence aside from Bertrand. Have Valencia at the moment too. If they play 3 at the back he is a great option at WB.

  22. Floyd69
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Captain Benteke just for GW1 and then trade for Firmino for GW2? Good differential and season start if it came off. He scored against Schalke. Be daring? Or just start with Firmino and captain Lukaku/Kane/KDB like everyone else?

    1. The Iron Tulip
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      I'm tempted as I think hudds will struggle to handle him but I think I will play safe and go with a city player as captain

    2. Rover
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      You could actually keep Benteke for a few more GWs as he has a great record against Pool and plays Swansea at home after that, whereas Pool has very poor GW3/4 fixtures.

    3. Pompel
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      At least have him in my team atm

      1. Floyd69
        • 13 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Cheers lads. Might give it a go

  23. t4thomas
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Francis.

    a) nailed.
    b) not nailed.
    c) whatever.

    1. jiGGidyJ1
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      B

    2. Doosra - ☭BowenOfRice☭
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      A). šŸ™‚

      1. jiGGidyJ1
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Sorry, as a Bournemouth fan, I know that he's our captain.. but he's far from "nailed". Yes, we were a better team when he played last year, but there is competition with Adam Smith for the RB position. He will be rotated, therefore he's not nailed at all.

        1. Astronautovic
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          ls cook fit for saturday?

          1. jiGGidyJ1
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            Yes, he's fit as far as I know (both Cooks)

            1. Astronautovic
              • 10 Years
              9 years, 1 month ago

              Thanks
              So i will keep steve cook in my team šŸ˜€

              1. jiGGidyJ1
                • 11 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                Should be safe, good luck šŸ™‚

        2. Doosra - ☭BowenOfRice☭
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          Well, as a FPL player, I think you better check this:

          https://www.whoscored.com/Teams/183/Show/England-Bournemouth

          When Francis was injured last Season, you lost 4 on the trot.

          He is club captain, and I think that he is nailed. Adam Smith will move to right midfield, as he did last year.

          1. jiGGidyJ1
            • 11 Years
            9 years, 1 month ago

            I know that already. And I do think he will start the season, but you've got a different definition of "nailed" to me I think. I can't see him starting every game, which is what "nailed" means to me

            1. Doosra - ☭BowenOfRice☭
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 16 Years
              9 years, 1 month ago

              In addition, I see that Adam Smith was not even in the squad for the last friendly.

              1. jiGGidyJ1
                • 11 Years
                9 years, 1 month ago

                Ok, so I was correct. You only care about the first 1-2 games. That's cool, then yes, he probably is "nailed", as you call it

        3. AJ24
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          So who would ypu pick between:
          A) Ake
          B) Daniels

    3. Slumdog-Mignolet
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      A

  24. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 17 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    New community article

    Here's FPL Chief with a trio of Southampton options ahead of their excellent early fixture run

    http://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/2017/08/09/southampton-best-three-options/

    1. 32chickens
      • 16 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      shoot me down but I think swans will turn them over.
      atmosphere @ saints doesnt appear good

  25. bejzu
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    RMT's Please

    Team 1
    Forster / Foster
    Daniels / Cedric / Walker / Mee / Rosenior
    Carroll / Zaha / KDB / Milivojevic / Romeu
    Jesus / Kaku / Kane

    VS

    Team 2
    Forster / Foster
    Daniels / Kolasanoc / Walker / Mee / Rosenior
    Iwobi / Zaha / KDB / Milivojevic / Romeu
    Jesus / Kaku / Lacazette

    1. Annie
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      you will have fun benching keeper points šŸ™‚

      1. bejzu
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        who do you suggest?
        apart from that what do you think? too light in midfield?

        1. bitm2007
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          mid's OK for a 4-3-3

    2. bitm2007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      A with Forster to Fabianski, then upgrade Rosenior to somebody who's fixtures rotate well with Mee's

      1. bejzu
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 1 month ago

        Cedric nailed GW 1?

        1. Annie
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          9 years, 1 month ago

          not in the slightest

  26. DOGS
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    best budget forward?? who will be safe around 5mil

    1. Karius-Matic Gueye
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      Only Ayew id say.

  27. TopCopy12345
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    RMT please:

    Foster Elliot
    PVA Lindelof Bertrand (Francis) (Naughton)
    KDB Tadic Mane Salah (Carroll)
    Lukaku Benteke Gabbiadini

    Thanks

  28. lasmons
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Foster - Fabianski
    Kompany - Kolasinac - Yoshida (Lejeune) (4.0)
    Alli - KdB - Willian - Fraser (Tarroll)
    Kun(C) - Kaku - JRod

    Too much with tripple City? Just have a feeling they will start with a bang!

  29. Moyseehh
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Hi Guys,

    Please help here:

    A) Foster + Walker

    B) DDG + Monreal

    1. Exotica
      • 11 Years
      9 years, 1 month ago

      a

  30. Exotica
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Option A
    Foster - Elliot
    Cedric-Manquillo-Hegazi-Rangel-Tomkin
    Ali-Coutinho-Sterling-LoftusCheek-Mane
    Firmino(or Defoe or Benteke) Kane Rooney

    Option B
    Foster - Elliot
    Francis-Manquillo-Hegazi-Rangel-Tomkin
    Ali-Coutinho-Sterling-LoftusCheek-Mane
    lacazette- Kane- Mounie

    which option should i stick with??