Scout Notes

Scout Notes – Arsenal Book Wembley Date

Arsenal began the post-Sanchez era by bouncing back against champions Chelsea to book their Carabao Cup Final place against Man City.

The side has certainly been quick to move on from the departure of their star man, securing a February 25 date with City at Wembley despite conceding an early goal last night when Eden Hazard converted Pedro’s through ball.

Nacho Monreal continued his new-found attacking threat by seeing his effort from a corner bounce in off the unfortunate Antonio Rudiger to level the score before Granit Xhaka poked home the winner when he steered in Alexandre Lacazette’s deflected pass after the break.

Arsenal then held on comfortably enough as a Chelsea team who lost the in-form Willian to a hamstring injury with just 30 minutes on the clock struggled for attacking cohesion.

The victory means that the Gunners and Man City will play each other twice in the space of five days, following up their cup final clash with a league fixture at the Emirates on Thursday, March 1, which will remain part of the Gameweek 28 schedule.

That is subject to change should Pep Guardiola’s side be taken to a FA Cup fifth round replay which, in turn, requires them to win this Sunday’s fourth round tie away at Cardiff City.

There are no such complications for Arsenal, who were knocked out in the third round, and the Carabao Cup now represents their best hope of silverware this season.

But any threat of rotation ahead of the February final looks remote as they will face Spurs in Gameweek 27 a full 15 days before the first match of their Man City double-header.

Instead, coach Arsene Wenger must decide how to deploy his resources in Europe, with the Gunners in action on successive Thursday nights in the Round of 32 of the Europa League before the Cup date with City.

As a result, Arsenal will play four times in ten days from February 22 onwards – Östersunds FK at home, Man City in the cup and then the league and, finally, away at Brighton on the Sunday of Gameweek 29.

Once again, the Gunners’ manager started with a 4-1-2-3 formation but it was his switch to a wing-back set-up after the break that helped the hosts garner momentum.

Having recovered from the hamstring problem that forced him off against Crystal Palace last weekend, Monreal continues to catch the eye.

The Spaniard scored an extraordinary 16 points from just 33 minutes of action against the Eagles, thanks to a goal and two assists. Returning to play the full 90 minutes last night, he’s the third most popular transfer target in FPL over the last 24 hours, acquired by 7,600 new owners.

New signing Henrikh Mkhitaryan was cup-tied last night, while fellow midfielder Aaron Ramsey recovered from illness to take his place on the bench. The Welshman, along with Sead Kolasinac was afforded just six minutes off the bench as the Gunners shut down the tie late on.

With the Sanchez situation now put to bed, back-to-back wins will have boosted the confidence ahead of clashes with Swansea City and Everton, though the subsequent two league fixtures – against Spurs and Man City – means many may steer clear until the schedule turns far kinder in Gameweek 29.

Chelsea, meanwhile, started brightly but tailed off last night, which also adequately describes their season to date.

Deployed as a “false nine”, Hazard confirmed his recent return to form with a third goal in two starts, but Alvaro Morata again missed out with a back injury, and the loss of Willian further reduced their attacking threat.

His replacement, new signing Ross Barkley, failed to make any real impact, while a defence bolstered by the return of Andreas Christensen from a head injury failed to keep a fourth clean sheet in five matches in all competitions.

The Blues’ immediate schedule (BOU wat WBA) suggests shut-outs could well be straight back on the agenda, but the 12.6% of Fantasy Premier League (FPL) managers with goalkeeper Thibaut Courtois in their teams might not be able to take advantage as the Belgian missed a second successive match with an ankle injury.

The hamstring problem for Willian is another concern, particularly as close to 100,000 managers have made him FPL’s second most popular Gameweek 25 purchase on the back of a 12-point display against Brighton last weekend.

Speaking post-match, Chelsea coach Antonio Conte played down the extent of Willian’s problem.

“I just spoke to the player. He said he felt a problem in his hamstring but he doesn’t think it will be a serious injury. I hope this feeling is right.”

Willian’s 9% FPL ownership will hope so, too.

Should he face a spell on the sidelines, Pedro could be called upon in a 3-4-3 against Bournemouth in Gameweek 25, though much will depend on Morata’s availability. With Chelsea facing Newcastle United in the FA Cup, we should gain further indication as to his approach for Wednesday from Sunday’s line-up.

785 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Rupert The Horse
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    Ooh. My name’s Green Windmill and I like linking articles. You bum.

    1. GreenWindmill
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Your pub awards have made you slow old man.

      1. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Heavy is the crown.

  2. Fitzy.
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    Nice win sans Sanchez... 🙂

  3. FrankieTheGent
    • 9 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    Is Mkhitaryan FA Cup-tied ?

    1. Top 210 Club
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Arsenal not in fa Cup

      1. FrankieTheGent
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Thanks for the reply (I shouldn't be so lazy)

    2. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Does it matter?

      1. FrankieTheGent
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Existentially?
        As in Albert Camus' notion of the absurd?

    3. Coot
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      All Arsenal players are until next season.

  4. Sims
    • 7 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    arsenla have two consecutive games at wembley and 2 consecutive games vs Man city

  5. Is lack of blanks and DGWKs bad news for FPL veterans?
    J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    6 years, 3 months ago

    Fantasy Football Scout daily hot topic

    As Chelsea falter in the Cup another blank Gameweek disappears.

    The Blues Gameweek 28 clash with Manchester United will now go ahead as planned.

    In addition Arsenal's clash that week with Manchester City looks certain to remain in the Gameweek, unless City end up with a replay in the FA Cup.

    This also means that two potential double gameweek fixtures also disappear.

    What do you think about these latest events revolving around Gameweek 28?

    Is it bad news for veterans who could have stolen a march on those that don't plan?

    Or is it good news as it gives us more flexibility with our future selections, with City, Utd, Chelsea and Arsenal assets now free of the shackles of a blank fixture?

    1. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Bad news for me. Main rival has double Chelsea defence. I suppose they shouldn't keep a clean sheet anyway...

    2. Toby Lerone
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Damn casuals getting away with it

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 14 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Was looking forward to those loaded up with players from those four teams either having to use a free hit chip or fielding hardly any players.

        Now that advantage has gone.

        1. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Amen.

        2. johnnys balloons
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          U are in first 5000. How many casuals are u expecting in that region of players? Players that dont care or know about DGW or BGW? There is a few I guess but not much than that

          1. J0E
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 14 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            You'd be surprised how many are there because they've already used lots of chips.

            But yes I take the point that the lower down the ranks you are the greater advantage of having more blanks and double gameweeks.

            There are still gains to be made though even in the top 5K.

            1. johnnys balloons
              • 6 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              As you are here now, I would love to hear you opinion about Joe Allen pick? I know Shaqiri is in spotlight but Allen has a bit more BPS points and 10 bonus point overall, 1 more than Shaqiri. It looks like, if Allen scores or asist he is in bonus points for sure. Shaqiri is more atacking player ofc but Allen is often there in front a goal somehow.

              1. J0E
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 14 Years
                6 years, 3 months ago

                For me I prefer the added threat that CMoting and Shaqiri offer. Allen will get some points but is in the main a CM at best.

                1. Captain Roberto
                  • 6 Years
                  6 years, 3 months ago

                  Neither score regular returns so you have to go with the form player, be that returns or if both blank then which ever underlying stats you prefere.

                  E.g. Allen went ballistic for about 4gwks on a row last year.

      2. jia you
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        hehe, true!

    3. Pacer.
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Utterly over the moon as someone who spunked their FH too early and used the second WC to try to get an edge over the last few and upcoming gameweeks

      1. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Wow you’re lucky.

      2. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 14 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Good news for you definitely.

        ...although you may not think that way in Gameweek 31 when the planners are unleashing their free hit chip. 😉

        1. Toby Lerone
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          I hope there are 9 blanks that gameweek. My rival has used his FH chip

          1. Waterwheel Inc.
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 12 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            I don't think you would . . . even with your free hit you could field max 6 players!

        2. Rupert The Horse
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Which two DGW fixtures could disappear? Would that not mean FH has less value as it can be replaced by WC?

          1. Captain Roberto
            • 6 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            I think historically the matches missed because of teams in the EFL Cup final (possibly two fixtures, but now just the one -Ars/City) were moved back in the season to GW34ish.

            This season the Arsenal/City match has just been moved a few days so still remains a GW28 fixture.

            Thus we had a potential 2 matches moved to a later gameweek to cover the EFL Cup Final teams. Now we have none.

        3. Krionos
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          No guarantee that the FH chip will give you a massive advantage. I remembered earlier in the season you said a 30 point gain on the FH is very accceptable. And for those that gambled early in those weekends where City had huge scores they would hopefully still have a handy advantage that others need to claw back!

          1. J0E
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 14 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            If someone got 30 pts from that FH chip then they are fine. But the value of the FH around a tricky period of blanks and dgwks is that it helps with planning.

            It means you don't have to hoard players from rubbish sides as they have a fixtre in a BGW. It means you can for example treat BGW 31 in isolation and really focus on the other chips and doubles.

            Its really hard to quantify - but the FH chip for those who plan well could generate far more points over a longer period not just when it is fielded.

        4. Pacer.
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          More time can only be a good thing

    4. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Well it does frustrate a bit as there have been plenty of times I wanted to use TC. Lucky for me in another way though after my accidental use of the free hit.

      1. RedLightning
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        The Free Hit chip does seem to be a bit too easy to activate accidentally.

        Fantasy Football Geek did too, and I'm sure you aren't the only ones.

    5. NestorC
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Bad news, my rival has used his wc so he couldn't get that good team for a dgw, now i am not sure when it will be and will there be any double gw?

      1. RedLightning
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        There will almost certainly be double game-weeks in GW34 and GW37, arising from clashes with the FA Cup 6th round and semi-finals, but there are now unlikely to be any others still to come.

        1. NestorC
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Cheers

          1. Captain Roberto
            • 6 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            No longer a gw34 dgw

    6. FrankieTheGent
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Happy with it.
      Glad I avoided messing my team around to accommodate a blank and then the DGW would have been 4 big teams playing each other. So I wouldn't have played a chip. It would have meant captaining someone from those teams while Kane and Salah (owned by so called casuals) punished us

    7. Individual
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Very nice. Was possibly too soon to be planning for 28 anyway: the advantage would have been nice to have over some, but it wouldn't have been enough players blanking for there to be a huge advantage I think.

      In terms of flex, I'm thinking of a 2-3 week rank push by bringing Sane in for WBA bur LEI - was a bit of a risk before but now I am emboldened by the lack of the blank.

      Shame about the DGW going - but a lot of stuff still needing settling before the optimal strategy going forward can be theorised!

      1. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Anyone else just look up emboldened?

        1. Individual
          • 10 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          "now i fink dat i'm gna do it cos there ain't no blank m8"

          1. Rupert The Horse
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            Noice.

        2. Captain Roberto
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          No. Just you.

    8. Infamy, Infamy
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Remaining schedule should offer plenty of opportunities for veterans to steal a march.

      Rotation due to Champions League etc will provide a major opportunity.

    9. ==rvn10==
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Not really a bad scenario for the vets, as we should be able to adapt to any change that's thrown at us! But losing a dgw is always disappointing.

    10. rdamjan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Bad news. Blanks brings more fun in the game.

    11. Virgil Hilts
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      It is what it is.

      There will be other DGWs and BGWs coming anyway.

      Anyone on here should be able to take advantage, especially those with all their chips left.

      Que Sera Sera, whatever will be will be

    12. Krionos
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      "Those that don't plan" is a bit harsh isn't it Jonty?

      I've used a lot of my chips and this is good news for me. But that isn't to say I haven't planned all season. I've just decided to not plan ahead as far as some others do and rather, have focused on the known and how to maximise my points on that 🙂

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 14 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Every year those who use chips around doubles and blanks steal a march on those who have used them earlier in the season.

        As a season long game with 38 rounds it makes sense to do that.

        Will take an awful lot more planning but obviously not impossible to get through GWK 31, 34, 35 and 37 unscatched without many chips.

        1. Pacer.
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          That's a big claim

          How have you managed to to isolate these two groups away from the mass of people who just pay less attention

          1. J0E
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 14 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            Big claim but every year without fail those who use wildcards and more recently other chips shoot up the rankings around DGWKS and Blanks.

            Its just reality.

            If someone has used their BB or FH chip or second wildcard already then they are at a disadvantage.

            1. ZaZaZu
              • 8 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              Why are we at a disadvantage? I used my second wildcard early and where I was stagnated at 80k, I’m now at 20k and I feel my team has more flexibility going forward. Of course I’m at a disadvantage to you now as I’m still behind your ranking, but I could have lost momentum and 150k now waiting to optimise my chips at what is effectively the last month or two if the game that may only at best get me back to 80k. I think momentum plays a huge part and this game changes weekly, look at the template, it’s dissolving quickly

              1. Licious Lizard (delete acc)
                  6 years, 3 months ago

                  You are obviously at a disadvantage from this point going forward. You have one less tool is your toolbox.
                  That is not to say, that you didn’t benefit more form using the WC, but you’re clearly not in as good a position going forward as those who have all chips intact

                  1. ZaZaZu
                    • 8 Years
                    6 years, 3 months ago

                    Obviously, but my point is that by waiting to use all my chips coming from 40,000 places behind you, I might be instead protecting a lead of 40,000 places in front of you. It’s how effectively those chips have worked and we’re not taking about one GW, it’s maybe the next 8 that gives me momentum based on that wildcard.

                    1. ZaZaZu
                      • 8 Years
                      6 years, 3 months ago

                      I’ll give you an example. Jonty is at 20k, I’m at 40k. I don’t bring in Aguero on my wildcard and captain him, my ranking is still 40k. I have no advantage over Jonty because we both have all our chips, I’m only going to catch him if my captain choices are better and we can all agree, that’s going to be unlikely. However, I wildcarded early, I have Aguero and now my rank is 20k along with Jonty. He now has an advantage over me because he can wildcard but in 6 weeks time, but by then I may now be protecting a decent lead based on my wildcard decisions as my team is not so template anymore. I would prefer to be in that position than go the former because I can go to some lengths to protect it rather than go maverick. Surely that makes sense?

                      1. ZaZaZu
                        • 8 Years
                        6 years, 3 months ago

                        I get your point though, it’s a disadvantage going in to the latter stages without all chips. I can agree but I guess I’m trying to say, there will be many that will hold off using the chip based on this opinion that could leave them worse off in the long run as the wildcard could be of huge value being played early. It’s all ifs and buts though

                • ZaZaZu
                  • 8 Years
                  6 years, 3 months ago

                  I feel your point makes sense if you have effectively managed your team and head to GW30 onwards in a position of strength but in reality your talking about those who are in the the top 50k. I would be more than happy to risk chips to get into a position of strength heading to the back end of the season rather than lose momentum, not consolidate my position and drop away hoping that my chips might (and it’s a big might) propel me 100,000 places that I may now need to make up.

              2. Jönny
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 14 Years
                6 years, 3 months ago

                Hi Jonty.

                Not necessarily disputing the claim, but is it based on actual stats or just accepted wisdom?

                If you're further down the ranks then it's easier to "shoot up" the ranks. Maybe the people who use them towards the end of the season and climb the ranks might just be "shooting up" to the same sort of rank they'd have been at, had they played the chips earlier?

                Accepted wisdom was that the TC should be used on a DGW player. Anyone who used it for one of Kane's or Aguero's hattricks might disagree.

                Is there an argument that – in "a season long game with 38 rounds" – using your wildcard with a longer term strategy in mind is as good as or even better than using it to lead up to one six-week period at the end of the season?

                I absolutely get the reasoning behind saving chips for DGWs. In fact, I've saved both my BB and TC for them. Unless I've misunderstood things, there may now only be one DGW left. Is that "bad luck derailing my careful planning" or is it actually a case that being too wedded to the accepted wisdom has meant I'll end up wasting one or both of them?

              3. Pacer.
                • 9 Years
                6 years, 3 months ago

                'It's just reality'

                Where's the evidence for this?
                How do you know this?
                How did you isolate chip savers and early wild carders from, let's call them 'casuals' to test this?
                We know 'casuals' drop away for allsorts of reasons including but not limited to chip use
                How did you measure the gains from early chip use and compare them to late chip use

                I realise statistically it's a good idea to play a bench boost or TC in a double game week, that much is common sense. But the debate is more complex. Linked to that whole WC debate and to some degree BB are DGW's, which see massive changes in personal, often dictated by limited and non-deal options.

                People massively simplify what's happening and because traditionally they play these chips later than 'casuals' they see the inevitable climb as an overall gain, but there's no actual evidence of that. It's just anecdotal

          2. Krionos
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 13 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            Oh it's a definite advantage to have chips remaining.

            I just meant that it doesn't mean that people who have used chips "don't plan". Some people as I heard on the scoutcast earlier this season in the "rough and smooth" section, have used some chips to great effect already and should be ahead.

            1. RedLightning
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 13 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              Some took a big risk by using their chips early and got lucky.

              Many more took similar risks and didn't.

      2. Feyzi
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Definitely bad news theoretically. Historically, logically, DGWs always mean more options for veterans that others fail to see and more errors for the inexperienced. Long term planning and patience works best with DGWs. It limits the chances of jumping the ranks for the veterans. I am sure all veterans have raised in the rankings in the last few weeks, always. Very simple and straightforward in my view.

      3. FPLMatt
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Bad news indeed. I've saved all my chips for this part of the season and am currently 2nd in my league. The guy who is top of my league has used his second Wildcard.

        He has the likes of De Gea, Christensen, Jones, Lingard, Sane, Sterling, Otamendi

        Was hoping he'd have had to use the free hit chip for gw 28 but now he will be able to use it in GW 31 so can't see myself massively gaining on him! 🙁

        1. Saka Rice
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Can someone please explain to me what's happening with DGW? I'm reading people saying that
          there wont be any? or talking about the Free Hit Chip? Basically wtf is going on lol
          I havent used any chips yet, still have my 2nd wildcard too surely thats a good thing?

      4. tisza
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        think it's about equal just because of the difficulty of those 2 particular fixtures.
        If it had been top sides against bottom sides would have made things more interesting.
        Having to take out some City, Chelsea,Utd would have been too disruptive for a GW (even though City play Chelsea GW29).
        Still think City DGWs are going to be a minefield late season if still in Europe and PL probably be won with 5/6 games to go.

      5. Pasqualinho
        • 14 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        As the Queen once said to me when I enquired about the possibility of getting an OBE - 'It is what it is'.

      6. rvp786
        • 12 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        taking all this into account - whens the best time to use the wildcard?

        1. RedLightning
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 13 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Six possibilities:

          1. In DGW34 or DGW37 if you have already used your Triple Captain or Bench Boost chip.
          2. To prepare your squad for a double game week, especially for the one in which you intend to use your Bench Boost.
          3. To restore your squad after a blank game-week, if you didn't have a Free Hit chip for that BGW.
          4. Whenever your squad has a lot of problems and you need it most.
          5. For a vital head-to-head match or in the later stages of a Cup competition.
          6. In GW38 if you haven't used it earlier.

      7. DaisyDaisyDaisyDaisy
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Part of my reason for losing Hazard last week was to make a start on limiting the potential blanker numbers - well it was him or Christensen and I obviously made the right move!

        1. Kun, Ayew Nigerian?
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Awww

      8. Rhinos
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        There's pros and cons but i definately get more pleasure out of beating someone who is too planning orientated to bring in kun due to a supposed incoming blank than i do beating someone who has 6 man u and chelsea players because they don't care what a blank gameweek is

        1. The Hindu Monkey
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          This

          There is a sweet spot in looking ahead to fixtures of about 2 to 3 weeks

          This site would often have you believe it was more like 7 or 8

          Play the fixtures in the short term, not the long term and you will almost always be outscoring long term planners who only care about fielding 15 double game week players in week 34 regardless of who they are or how out of form they might be

          1. Soonmixdin
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 13 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            This my approach - allows more flexibility in getting in form players as and when they start scoring.

      9. shirtless
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        I agree with Pasqualinho above. 'It is what it is.' It's no good crying over milk that's not been spilt. Those blanks were only a maybe.

        Need to work on the definites which are reduced fixtures in GW31, and a probability of DGW's in GW34 & GW37. Like many I have Freehit ready for GW31 and will as usual wildcard and BB prior to one of the big doubles. Hopefully I can hold my 30k rank until then and get a bit of a rank boost for the run-in. Bravo to those with TC still left. I gambled mine on Mr Kane!

        By the way the power of the BB and wildcard around DGW34/37 can't be under estimated. I went from 430k to 109k finish last year and only lost my ML by 4 points having been 150 behind at Xmas!

      10. Numb
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Of course it's bad news for people on here. Blanks and DGWs are always good for planners and most on here are planners, whether they've started that planning yet or not. Most FPL players wouldn't have been aware of the blank until the Friday night before and now that problem has been taken away.

      11. The Rumour Mill
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Its bad news, no doubt. I always make up ground in blanks and doubles, I'm sure many others who use this site do too.

        However, in terms of the teams who would have potentially been involved in the blanks, I don't think it changes too much. GW28 represents a natural "jumping off point" for Chelsea assets anyway, and its very much a mixed bag from this point onwards for City and Utd too. Particularly if any of these sides make the FA cup quarter finals in GW31. (and we will know before GW28 who the teams blanking in GW31 will be (barring any necessary replays). ).

        Their schedules GW28-31:

        Chelsea: mnu, mnc, PAL, bur/BLANK
        Man City: ars, CHE, sto, BRI/BLANK
        Man Utd: CHE, pal, LIV, whu/BLANK

        What you also have to factor in from GW27 onwards is the return of the champions league and europa league. We will likely see rotation in all the top 6 sides as a result, more so as the season goes on. So actually it may be that any lovely blue fixtures on the fixture ticker for the top 6 sides are going to be in reality massive rotation hotspots. Certainly food for thought as we near the business end of the season anyway (how are we in GW24 already - time flies!)

      12. Ruth_NZ
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Helps me. I was likely to wildcard in GW28 anyway but didn't want to be too compromised by blanks that week. Now there are none and the GW28 wildcard becomes an even better option. 🙂

      13. Pieterke30
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Yes, but not much to say abt it. It is what it is.

      14. Jafalad
        • 14 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        The disappearance of this dgw has essentially stopped my rise to the top.

      15. Waterwheel Inc.
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        The downsides of gains against "casuals" are obvious, but I was looking forward to it mainly as an excuse to dump some City assets, and breath some fresh life into my squad. I may do this anyway, but it will be a much higher risk/reward decision to do so now! The bright side is that it makes Arsenal players an option a little earlier, which I do quite fancy.

      16. melvinmbabazi
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Bad news

      17. Freddo
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        GW28 - Non event
        GW31 - Everyone will C Salah - Non event.
        GW35 - People will WC before it & pick up the key blankers - Non event.

        Points on the board are going to be gold this year, seems the banana skin weeks are not too slippery.

    13. Bobby_Baggio
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Afternoon all. 2FT and 1.3m ITB. Which of these transfers sound ok?

      Adrián • Speroni
      Alonso • Otamendi • Jones • Dunk • Tomkins
      Salah • Sterling • Son • Arnautovic • Lingard
      Kane • Firmino • Quaner

      A) Arnie > Shaqiri and save FT
      B) Arnie + Son > Mahrez + Mkhi
      C) Arnie + Son > Shaq + KDB
      D) Arnie + Lingard + Son > Mahrez + Shaqiri + Mkhi -4
      E) Anything else

      1. Quan MisTaka
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Not tempted by Choupo rather than shaq?

        1. Bobby_Baggio
          • 13 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          nah shaq stats are better

          1. Quan MisTaka
            • 6 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            I have to disagree. Last 6 games Choupo much better

    14. Gooner97
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Arsenal have made a fresh bid worth £50m to sign Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang from Borussia Dortmund after a £44m offer was rejected. [Times]

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 14 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        As his name suggests, the bid has bounced straight back to them.

        1. Rupert The Horse
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Oh Jonty.

        2. Gooner97
          • 10 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Hulk this

        3. Your Mum's Athletic
          • 12 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Tumbleweed 😉

        4. tisza
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          practicising for the comedy club next week. Need to up your game a bit 🙂

          1. J0E
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 14 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            Ha, I don't perform thankfully, just help organise. 🙂

      2. Bobby_Baggio
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        They'll prob drop it to 40m after a few mins

        1. Rupert The Horse
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Was just thinking this.

        2. G-Whizz
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Or just add a quid to it...

      3. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Hope he comes in and does well. A resurgent Arsenal would be perfect.

    15. klavan
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      A)Vardy+Shaqiri
      B)Mahrez+Wilson

      1. Bobby_Baggio
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        prefer B

      2. Individual
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        A for me as I'm sceptical about Mahrez before the transfer window closes

    16. Pacer.
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Utterly over the moon as someone who spunked their FH too early and used the second WC to try to get an edge over the last few and upcoming gameweeks

      1. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Did the WC turn out alright?

      2. Sims
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        why? i wasnt going to use my FH cip on this gw 28 anyway....its 31 u need to worry about

    17. The Head-Ake
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Chelsea fans, what do we think of our current scenario with the transfers? Who would you want our club to chase and strengthen our squad with? Who would you see exiting or being loaned out of the club and would you like Conte to stay?

      P.S : I'm not really back 😉

      1. LosBlancos
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Not a Chelsea fan, but have a Q for you.
        Do you think Morata remains the first choice with Dzeko incoming? I heard rumors that he won't transfer unless his pitch time is guaranteed as well

    18. Your Mum's Athletic
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      I guess Arnie has to go but I'm stuch with what to do, any ideas if this were your team?

      Adrian Speroni

      Alonso Otamendi Jones Ogbonna Long

      Salah Sterling Arnie Richarlison Lingaard

      Aguero Kane Quaner

      2FT 0.0itb

      1. Individual
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Hey YMA. I think for me it'd be Arnie to Shaq, bank the other transfer, and then maybe do a mini WC midweek to move Richarlison and maybe Lingard (if he loses his spot) on. To who is obviously difficult for now, but hopefully more options will emerge shortly

        1. Your Mum's Athletic
          • 12 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          hey man, cheers good advice

      2. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Richarlison>Albrighton/Chamberlain, Arnie> 8.0+ mid of choice?

      3. Hy liverpool
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Go crazy or go home
        Kane Lingard Arnie to Firmino Hazard Shaqiri

        1. Your Mum's Athletic
          • 12 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          😯

          1. Hy liverpool
            • 10 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            You're Not that brave , I know 😉

            1. Your Mum's Athletic
              • 12 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              😯

              1. Hy liverpool
                • 10 Years
                6 years, 3 months ago

                Haha.. enjoy your OR then.
                But keep those stats/posts mate 🙂

      4. Baps hunter
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        I would change formation to 442. Downgrade Arnie to Mili and in comes VvD? Shaqiri is mass hysteria and risky move. Liverpool cs is likely and VvD may assist and score.

    19. Individual
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Hello all

      Just to quickly mention once more that our 25th pod is out: http://whogottheassist.com/pod-25-gameweek-24-risk/

      Cheers 😀

      1. Hy liverpool
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Cheers individual

        1. Individual
          • 10 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Cheers man hope you enjoy 😀

      2. OldBenKenobi
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Going to give it a listen now 🙂

        1. Individual
          • 10 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Thanks Ben!

    20. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      All Chips intact. My current thoughts are something like this
      GW 30: WC
      GW 31: FH
      GW 32:
      GW 33:
      GW 34: BB/TC
      GW 35: Try to mitigate this somewhat with original wildcard team
      GW 36:
      GW 37: BB/TC
      GW 38:

      1. LosBlancos
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Why Free Hit the next week after the Wild Card? ie why not Wild Card the week later

        1. Rupert The Horse
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Maybe there’s a run of fixtures wher he could get a load of home players 3 weeks in a row.

        2. Krionos
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          If any chip is to be used after a WC, surely the BB? If you WC in GW 30, what's the guarantee you will have 15 fresh players in GW 37??

      2. Individual
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        No sense to WC in 30 if you're FH in 31 :). Why not WC in 32-33 instead?

        1. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          If there's still info about the DGWs we don't know by 30, I'll wait for 32. But honestly if all the information is available by then I don't see why not to do it GW30, as it means I get an extra week of influence from my wildcard instead of trudging along with my average team for one more week.

          1. Individual
            • 10 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            Fair enough. There's also an international break between 31 and 32, which might be reason to reassess here - but I think you are on the right track

            1. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
              • 7 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              Blegh another one. Cheers for the info

            2. Rupert The Horse
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 11 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              THanks.

        2. tisza
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 9 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          you the podcast guy?
          Listened to a couple yesterday. Different but interesting. Well done if you are

          1. tisza
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 9 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            okay just looked up the page. sorry

            1. Individual
              • 10 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              Yep - I'm one half of WGTA 🙂

              Thanks for listening! We're trying to do something that blends wider talk about FPL and some of the more present concerns (e.g. mid priced mids) each week so I'm glad you find it interesting 😀

              1. tisza
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 9 Years
                6 years, 3 months ago

                yep interesting will listen again in future

                1. Individual
                  • 10 Years
                  6 years, 3 months ago

                  Sweet thank you! 🙂

      3. FrankieTheGent
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Which ones are the DGW and BGW and what's the GW 31 significance for the FH

        1. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Blank GW on 31, 35 and DGW 34 and 37 (we presume, as historically this has been the case). The big blank is GW31.

          1. FrankieTheGent
            • 9 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            Ok. I hear what your saying
            How about WC in 35 and build to a GW 34 BB as it gives you an exit from players built up for 34 plus eyes on 35 and 37 ?

            1. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
              • 7 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              If my team were in a better position, I would. As it is, I feel like it is slowly crashing and burning and my two options currently are try to fix it slowly and watch it lose ground or take hits to fix it and still lose ground. With the early wildcard I still have DGW teams in mind and the 3 FT I get should mitigate any damage in time for the DGW37

              1. FrankieTheGent
                • 9 Years
                6 years, 3 months ago

                No I agree. I am an advocate of the early wildcard and planning for the DGW/ BGW
                Unless you get unlucky with injury then I think over the period you get the benefit.

                I have a thought that FH in GW38 affords the following benefits:
                Usually a lot of scoring points that week
                You can focus on players at Home; still playing for something (either team or golden boot)
                You're budget is at it's peak and plenty of 3.9s around to facilitate

                Thoughts?

                1. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
                  • 7 Years
                  6 years, 3 months ago

                  It's an option. It also means you get an extra FT to use over everyone else, as that is the obit week where the FH does not cost you an extra transfer. If you can get through GW 38 fine it's a great use of the chip imo.

      4. tisza
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        honestly giving it no thought until after 5th round draw.

    21. Stimps
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      A) Silva, Pogba
      B) KDB, Lingard

      1. Individual
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        A. Can you fit Sane in?

    22. boc610
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Laporte means stones wont be a regular starter now, sanchez could mean less game time for rashford and lingard. not a great transfer window for England and southgate in a world cup year...the one plus is jack wilshire

      1. Individual
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        I'm also worried as an Otamendi owner - he's probably on his way after the game against Burnley.

        Tbf I'm not too sad about that; I've got a princely -1 from him so far in returns, with him coming in as part of a -4 and having given me 2 -1 2 since 😀

        1. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Unlucky :/

          1. Individual
            • 10 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            Meh - happened to me a few times this year (Lingard, Wilsonx2, Hazard) where I've brought in a player who has been returning and they've gotten me bugger all. Just the way it goes sometimes 😀

            1. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
              • 7 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              Hazard loves doing that too. I'm not letting him do it to me again 😛 Happens to everyone I think. Got Arnie in for a hit last week.

      2. Andy'81
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Where are you getting this Stones for Laporte news from? Laporte has been playing as the left sided CB (He is left footed) and that generally tends to be the position that Otamendi plays on rather than Stones as he'll have Kompany for competition.

        If anything the Laporte signing is bad news for Otamendi owners.

    23. FrankieTheGent
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      If you need to find something out which you could go through the effort of investigating but the footfall on here makes it more expedient to post a question. Do you
      Ask the question on here?
      Or
      Realise that the sarcastic; trite; point-scoring replies you will actually get isn't worth the hassle?

    24. OldBenKenobi
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Willian could still be ok for the Bournemouth game.
      Wait you see those people transferring him in early getting away with it again!
      Jammy....

      1. Individual
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Ugh I heard that on twitter this morning! The vindictive side of me is hoping he's not available as I've lost 0.2 in TV this GW already (Lingard and Kenny falls) thanks to trigger-happy transfer marketeers and hope they get punished points wise as I've been punished in price 😛

        1. OldBenKenobi
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Ha ha ha! I know the feeling 😉

      2. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Falling in value now.

    25. AzzaroMax99
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      If Alli to Mahrez, who to get for Arnie?

      a) Pogba
      b) Ramsey
      c) Wilian
      d) Shaqiri

    26. TheTinman
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Filthy casuals win again

    27. King Kun Ta
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Current team....

      Elliot (Foster)
      Ota Ogbonna Mee Christensen (Holgate)
      Salah Arnie* Sterling Son (Atsu)
      Kun (C) Kane (DCL)

      2 FT and 0.2 ITB

      Willin' to go -4....so 3 TF to use. Arnie will go probably....when injury def confirmed.

      But should i give my midfield or defence priority with the other TF's?? Suggestions? Won't get Alonso though...

    28. LosBlancos
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      A note to members. Look at the defensive stats of Hudersfield and WBA before deciding who to captain between Kun and Salah.
      Look at Shots on Target, Attempts in the Box and Chances conceded center for WBA (Aguero) vs Chances conceded left flank for hud (Salah).

      1. Individual
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Sage advice 🙂

        1. LosBlancos
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          I don't use the members stats often enough. Hope my mini analysis proves fruitful 🙂

      2. LosBlancos
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Also xG and (delta)xG for Liverpool and Man City. The winner seems clear to me

        1. Individual
          • 10 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Yeah deffo. I'm thinking of cappoing a City option as a punt (Sterling I have it on currently) but I strongly suspect I'll bottle it. Not quite high enough yet for a Salah return to hurt me if I don't cappo, but if you're in the upper echelons and looking to stay there there's no other choice I don't think.

          1. LosBlancos
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 6 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            I don't really play it safe, but I ignored Salah once because he was the "casual captain" when I thought he was the best option > my C blanked and I fell out of the FPL Cup due to the captaincy. All in all, just captain the player you think will score the most pts that GW.

      3. LosBlancos
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        And yeah, filter last two GWs or last two home matches (hud) and last two away matches (wba). Seem the most relevant to me.

      4. rnrd
        • 9 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        what's the conclusion then ? 🙂

        1. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Get a membership u lazy boy. If you want the rewards you have to pay the price. I'm alright with not having the membership advantages and I would not bum some freebies if I was you.

        2. LosBlancos
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          The membership is really worth it if you spend a lot of time thinking about FPL. For the exclusive articles if nothing else.
          I can't divulge the info, but you can try and read between the lines in the comments

      5. Coot
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Weren't the defensive stats for Swansea and the offensive stats for Liverpool also pointing to a clear winner?

        1. LosBlancos
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          It was an outlier result surely. I take it as a positive due to determination to bounce-back. And Swansea have a good bus record (held back Spurs), while Hudersfield don't even have a bus driver 🙂

          1. Coot
            • 13 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            No bus driver, nice analogy! I think it could go either way but I've always been on Kun for this week more on feeling than stats.

            1. LosBlancos
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 6 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              A hattrick can do that to your feelings, granted it does the same for the players feelings as well probably - but the members section doesn't quantify that so we're left with chances and shots to analyze

              1. Coot
                • 13 Years
                6 years, 3 months ago

                No hattricks were involved (honestly). I brought Kun in for Kane a few weeks back and specifically targeted these set of fixtures as captain material.

                1. LosBlancos
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 6 Years
                  6 years, 3 months ago

                  Oh, so did I. At least for the NEW game, and that payed off.
                  I still think he scores at least three goals against WBA BUR LEI, but it's also about who I think could score more in each GW

                  1. Coot
                    • 13 Years
                    6 years, 3 months ago

                    "but it's also about who I think could score more in each GW".

                    That is the only criteria I use to select my captain.

                    1. LosBlancos
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 6 Years
                      6 years, 3 months ago

                      Tbh I think they both score well (8pts for both minimum)
                      And thats how it should be

      6. Kings of Lyon ★
        • 13 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Not much in it.

        As an aside, have look at the chance concede by evertons right flank 😯

        1. LosBlancos
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          I'll try to not give info away, but 11 vs 5 is a big indicator with the right filter.
          Granted Home vs Away comparison seems similar, but the xG shows that one team should "regress" 🙂

      7. Runaway
        • 12 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        You apparently did not take Home/Away parameter into account. When you do, picture is a bit more different.

        1. LosBlancos
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          I did actually, for me it's a tie on two fronts - but the other team wins the other two fronts (if you follow)

      8. Sandy Ravage
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        so Salah (c)?

        1. LosBlancos
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          I'm not sure to what extent I can talk about conclusions made by members stats, but you can see what my preference is between the lines here and on earlier (non members related) comments

    29. balint84
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      X) christiansen to azpi
      or
      Y) alli to de bruyne

      ?

      1. Individual
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Y - but why not Sane or Silva instead of tying up all that cash?

        1. balint84
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          rotation danger?

          1. Individual
            • 10 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            Not imminently I'd say.

        2. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Or Sterling if you don't own

          1. balint84
            • 8 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            i have sterling too. buy not enough cash for hazard.

      2. LosBlancos
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Y with Sane

        1. balint84
          • 8 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          rotation danger?

    30. wolves_simmo
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      This worth a -4?

      Out: Son & Lingard
      In: Mane & Iwobi

      Pickford
      Alonso - Chilwell - Otamendi
      Salah - Sterling - Son* - Lingard*
      Wilson - Kun - Kane

      1. LosBlancos
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        -4 for Iwobi 😆

        1. LosBlancos
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 6 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          I think Mane will bring a lot of points from now till the end of the season, but Iwobi is a horrible pick

        2. wolves_simmo
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Could bring in Choupo instead of Iwobi (£5.8m to spend)

      2. Individual
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        -4 for Iwobi dude. Mkhi just joined. Are you sure you want to do that?

        1. wolves_simmo
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Could bring in Choupo (WAT, bou, BRI, lei) instead of Iwobi?

          Just think Son is a minor rotation risk with tough fixtures & Lingard is a major rotation risk with Sanchez in.

          1. Individual
            • 10 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            yeah decent short term points grab with Choupers I think - for the same reason you don't like Lingard you shouldn't be picking Iwobi!

            I am probably going to keep Lionel Jesse for now.

            1. wolves_simmo
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 13 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              I would hold Jesse...but having Son as well is too much risk........the only mid id want is Mane....I need extra funds so it means shipping someone else and Lingard is high on my list of rotation risk.

    31. Ask Yourself
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Is Kenedy worth the punt? Will he be that effective at Newcastle?

      1. Virgil Hilts
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Don't know what position he'll play is the main issue I guess?

      2. Sandy Ravage
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Think Dummett & Manquillo are set at LB so Kenedy could be battling Atsu / Ritchie & Murphy for position further up-field.

      3. Andy'81
        • 6 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        I'd take Atsu before Kenedy.

    32. jia you
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Lukaku(C) v HUD?

      I'm not getting Kun as I've got KDB(C) locked in for this coming GW, but next week I'm considering selling Kane for Lukaku instead! (never though I'd be going back there).
      Sanchez could really give Kaku a boost. I was also very impressed with him, work-rate rise, against Burnley!
      I have no MUN atm and these games after Spurs (HUD & New) are looking scary and now the added bonus of them having no blank in 28.

      Kane + Zanka to Lukaku(C) + Jones(-4) ?

      1. Individual
        • 10 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Ni hao wo de pengyou!

        Yeah I've been thinking about this and it might lead me keeping hold of Lingard and hoping he keeps his spot in the wake of Sanchez there. Huge differential potential v Huddersfield if you have a San(c)hez or Kaku there.

        However. Moving Kane out for Liv Ars I don't think it worthwhile. Neither defence is impenetrable and Kane has a decent record against both - brace v Liverpool at Wembley and he's scored against arsenal joint 3rd most in his career so far. Would be for a 1 weeek punt and that doesn't feel viable to me.

        Why not KdB -> Sanchez if you can make it work? Doubt you can find a way to do United def+Sanchez in at once I guess.

        Pogba another one btw that might well improve after Sanchez's arrival btw for the same reasons you cite Kaku boost. Could be another option for your United option.

        1. jia you
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          Ni hao, the trouble with selling KDB is that I'd then have no City attack! Sanchez is very very tempting though! I think getting Jones in is a priority. I've actually sold Pogba (which could have been a mistake) as I feel Sanchez arrival with see hime playing even deeper, particularly is Sanchez is the one using that LHS area to attack from (which both players love to do).
          Cheers will need to think about it!

          1. Individual
            • 10 Years
            6 years, 3 months ago

            Ah cao. Yeah fair enough. My Sanchez plan is basically setting myself up for a horrible midweek and rolling the transfer. But I do fancy it.

            1. jia you
              • 7 Years
              6 years, 3 months ago

              just checked and I have the exact funds to do:
              KDB + Alonso to Sanchez(C) + Jones (-4)
              Seems a bit bonkers though!

              1. jia you
                • 7 Years
                6 years, 3 months ago

                wildcarding next week is not entirely out of the question either!

                1. jia you
                  • 7 Years
                  6 years, 3 months ago

                  But I'm off to SEA on my hols over the weekend so I think I'll just leave my team as is and switch off! Def don't want to going all wildcard on my holidays haha! GL mate, talk again!

    33. Salah'd n Sauce
      • 7 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Best Lingard replacement? 0.2 ITB so have 6.5 to spend.

      Already have Salah, Pogba, Sterling, Son...

      Groß, Richarlison, Shaq..??

      Thoughts?

      1. Virgil Hilts
        • 7 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Leave him for now. Might benefit if he remains in team with Sanchez increasing Utd's attacking threat?

        1. Salah'd n Sauce
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          I'm not so keen on double United. It filled a requirement a few GWs back.

      2. Netley Lucas
        • 8 Years
        6 years, 3 months ago

        Shaq has the 2 week numbers

        1. Salah'd n Sauce
          • 7 Years
          6 years, 3 months ago

          I like that Shaq also gives me 0.5 to play with if required.

    34. amplifiedAnt
      • 9 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Not sure whether to just consolidate or try something different. Seems I have lots of options (some significantly braver/more 'unorthodox' than others...)

      De Gea, Elliot
      Otamendi, Jones, Duffy, Kenny, Kiko*
      De Bruyne, Salah, Sterling, Arnautovic*, Loftus-Cheek*
      Kane, Firmino, Depoitre

      1FT, 0.7 ITB

      A. Kiko > Chilwell (needed fixing for ages)
      B. Arnautovic > Walcott/Shaqiri
      C. Otamendi > Alonso (opens up getting Aguero next week)
      D. Kane + De Bruyne > Aguero + Mahrez (-4)
      E. ?

    35. Butters_lfc9
      • 12 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      How do I use my FT's? If Arnie is ruled out, who do I replace him with?
      Pickford
      Alonso- Otamendi-Jones-Robertson
      Salah-Sterling-Son-Arnie
      Kane-Firmino

      Elliot-Ogbonna-Sako- Quaner
      0.2 ITB,2FT

    36. Where dahoud at
      • 6 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Walcott or shaqiri

    37. Toby Lerone
      • 8 Years
      6 years, 3 months ago

      Arnie to shaq this week

      Allows son to Sanchez (c) next week?

      Its either shaq or mahrez this week but like the cheeky Sanchez option next week but mahrez wouldn't allow that move. Thoughts?