Matters are pretty clear cut this Saturday morning – the team news has been definitive enough to leave us without a huge number of doubts going into the fixtures. Wayne Rooney will start, Chelseaโs injured stars wonโt. Gareth Bale, for once, looks nailed on.
Thatโs not to say weโve got nothing to worry about. The chances of a couple of Dutchman taking to the field are currently occupying my thoughts, and then of course thereโs the dreaded threat of postponements. The morning papers seem unlikely to help us with that particular concern, but my Saturday wouldnโt be complete without a quick cuddle up to the press before breakfastโฆ
Will Rafael Van der Vaart be risked against Liverpool?
The man has been a runaway success. A Fantasy Managers dream ticket. Nestled in the mid-price bracket, Rafael Van der Vaart has been central to everything Spurs of done since his arrival and his record at White Hart Lane almost guaranteeโs returns for his Fantasy owners when his clogged feet pitter-patter on home turf. Van der Vaart is a big doubt today though, rated as 50:50 at best to take the field against Liverpool, can the papers offer any reassurance on his chances of seeing action?
The Sun: Thereโs no comfort to be found here. The Sun go with Aaron on the right-flank โ itโs Peter Crouch and Jermaine Defoe up front.
The Times: Things are looking up. Van der Vaart starts in the support role behind a lone striker with Crouch fulfilling that role. Lennon also starts.
The Telegraph: This broadsheet begs to differ. Theyโve gone with a 4-4-2 with Defoe and Roman Pavlyuchenko starting up front. Lennon is on the right-flank with no place for the Dutch master.
The Guardian: Our final paper goes with the same outlook. Itโs a 4-4-2 here but Crouch is Defoeโs partner here.
I say: I canโt see Van der Vaart being risked. Icy conditions, hard pitch; the chances of Redknapp putting a less than 100% player out seem remote, particularly when Spurs sparkled so confidently without him in midweek. I expect a Defoe and Crouch frontline, fed by Lennon and Gareth Bale from the flanks.
With Cesc Fabregas missing, will Arsene Wenger turn to Robin Van Persie to lead his attack at Villa Park?
The Gunners need a win to banish memories of the bitter home defeat to Spurs last weekend, so the injury to their skipper comes as a major blow. Wenger has the talents of Van Persie to turn to, although heโs another Dutchman currently struggling for fitness. Starting Van Persie at Villa could be a risk in a week where risks have backfired for the Arsenal boss. Do the press feel that Arsenal need Van Persieโs inspiration?
The Sun: No. Our red top feels that Wenger will stick with Marouane Chamakh to lead his attack with Jack Wilshere in for Fabregas and Theo Walcott starting over Andrei Arshavin.
The Times: Van Persie starts here. Wilshere and Walcott also come in with Denilson making way.
The Telegraph: Thereโs no sign of the Dutchman. The Telegraph also feel that Wenger will stick with Chamakh but again itโs Wilshere who benefits from the absence of Fabregas.
The Guardian: Itโs Chamakh again here with Wilshere coming in for Denilson and Arshavin and Walcott on the flanks.
I say: Van Persie is just not ready for me. Wenger surely wonโt gamble another of his star assets before heโs 100% so I expect Van Persie to be on the bench again. Thatโs good news for Chamakh who gets a stay of execution in the starting lineup, while it should also mean that Samir Nasri will get to hog set-pieces and spot-kicks.
Will there be any Premier League postponements?
Predictably the papers tell us nothing; nobody really has a clue right now but, with no news of pitch inspections today, we look all set for a full Saturday programme.
Tomorrow could be a different matter and the Newcastle vs Chelsea game is rumoured to be the most at threat, with the North East suffering heavy snowfall earlier in the week. Undersoil heating will get the pitches playable, but itโs the health and safety concerns around the ground that could scupper things. We’re surely going to be fine and Iโve certainly not given the weather any real thought in my Wildcard selection. Iโm no Michael Fish though, despite the resemblance.

