Community
11 November 2016 30 comments
tm245 tm245
Share:

Finding the right Fantasy Premier League captain is crucial to success but can be one of the most difficult challenges to tackle. For some an explosive captain with stellar scores that come few and far between is the preferred option, while for others consistent scorers are best for the armband.

A year on from my first look at consistency and explosiveness among captaincy choices I’ve decided to crunch the numbers again to see who are the best candidates for the armband this season.

Just to recap, here are the points thresholds for each category of captaincy success.

Consistent 5-9 pts

Explosive 10-14 pts

Dynamite 15-19 pts

Legendary 20-24 pts

OMG AGUERO!!! 25+ pts

I have also added another column to show whether they have returned Home or Away, with comments on any peculiar tendencies within a player’s performance set.  The players listed at each position are those who have produced returns for at least five Gameweeks or who have reached double figures in points on at least three occasions. It is worth pointing out that no player has reached the screaming heights of the top “OMG Aguero!!!” category just yet.

Forwards

forwards (1)

Diego Costa – he has been remarkably consistent so far this season, with an unsurpassed nine returns out of eleven performances.  However, the explosiveness is not quite there, with only a pair of 12 point hauls in the explosive category

Romelu Lukaku and Sergio Aguero – both have been more explosive than the Chelsea striker, but have each returned in only about 55-60% of their matches.

The decision among these players is a classic consistency vs explosiveness choice.  Interestingly for our captaincy decisions, these big three have by and large delivered their biggest hauls in Away matches so far – this is somewhat counterintuitive for those who are primarily playing the fixtures, but even if it is a small sample size, this trend is worth monitoring.

Also of note are Islam Slimani, who has returned in three Home starts out of six total matches, and Harry Kane, who has not registered an explosion yet but has brought returns in four of six.

MIDFIELDERS

midfielders (1)

 

The strong performances from so many big name midfielders are once again on display here; of the four stars of the FPL midfield template, Eden Hazard, Phillipe Coutinho, and Alexis Sanchez have hit double figures four times so far, more than any of the forwards, including a Dynamite performance from each of them.  In addition, Roberto Firmino has produced two such spectacular hauls among his six weeks of returns.  One area to monitor: of Eden Hazard’s six returns so far, five have been in Home matches.

Elsewhere, noteworthy midfielders include Theo Walcott, who has matched the superstars with six returns so far but has not been as Explosive and Sadio Mane, whose five Gameweeks of returns so far seem fairly Home-based.  Staying with Liverpool, James Milner’s returns have been not so boring this season, with as many Explosive returns as the premium pick Kevin De Bruyne and more than Mesut Ozil.

Finally, Nacer Chadli is one to watch for the manager who likes an unconventional pick: he has three double digit hauls from seven matches so far, the highest ratio of explosiveness in the game.  The yin to Chadli’s yang is the robotic Nemanja Matic: if you want to captain a player to make sure you get a little bit of a return and don’t risk a blank when you pick him, the Chelsea rehabilitation project actually is your man: of his six returns, five have been at home, a model of Consistency so far.

DEFENDERS

defenders (1)

Not much excitement here, but one item is perhaps more telling about the forwards than summative about the defenders: Laurent Koscielny and Jose Holebas have each returned a Dynamite performance so far, the classic defender’s 15 pointer — a line of 6/4/3/2 as the only goal scorer on the road for a team keeping a clean sheet.  As interesting as those numbers is the fact that forwards as a whole only have a total of two Dynamite hauls.

A defender to watch for those seeking consistency is Marcus Alonso: five returns from six matches, including all five of his starts.

BIG PICTURE: RISK VS. REWARD

One of the striking pieces here for me is that Diego Costa is this year’s Jamie Vardy, offering a strikingly similar level of Consistency as the spearhead of a team with no European concerns as they take the league by storm.  However, for those who want to eschew steady returns and gamble, perhaps a midfielder is the way to go.

Unfortunately, there is no Riyad Mahrez so far this year, and not because of price.  At this point last season, Mahrez had amassed six double-digit returns already – this year only Hazard, Coutinho and Sanchez have four.  Those managers who avoided price bias and gave the in-form Leicester player the armband last season were rewarded continually throughout the first half of that campaign.  This year, the closest to a Mahrez so far would have been any manager clairvoyant enough to have an Etienne Capoue/Joe Allen hybrid in their squad.  Capoue’s descent has matched Allen’s rise almost week for week, with three double digit hauls the reward for his sorties into the box  Gameweeks 1-5 while the hirsute Stoke revelation delivered three in  Gameweeks 6-10.  The two of them combined for 91 points if those two stretches were combined, though the captaincy would have been a risk too far for most FPL managers.

Next week, as a follow up, I hope to use the Captain’s Poll, RMT, Fixtures, and Form to determine how predictable these players’ most impactful scores might have been.

30 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    Hope Costa stays safe and recovers soon - he looks ideal for this dullard manager.

    1. KingNidge
      • 10 Years
      9 years, 6 months ago

      He'll be grand.. and looks an improved version of himself this season.. fantastic.. Will be going the Harry Kane route though

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 16 Years
        9 years, 6 months ago

        consistent and explosive. Good move I think.

        1. Bruno Bruno!!
          • 10 Years
          9 years, 6 months ago

          im going KDB captain this week cant trust, just have feeling lukaku will troll everyone who captains him.

  2. andy85wsm
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 15 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    Before I read I'm going to go with consistent...

    1. andy85wsm
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 15 Years
      9 years, 6 months ago

      Ah no conclusion.

      I remember 2 seasons ago Hazard was getting barely any double figure hauls but was consistently coming in with 8-9 points.

      Someone I know kept captaining him and did far better than looking for that explosive option.

      Explosive can be fun of course though 🙂

  3. Musicholic
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    I think it just makes sense to have PPG (Points per game) into the perspective for the long run. I mean you can never really judge when a player is going to go explosive to legendary, its all a blind guess.

  4. Kered
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    I will be going with consistent with the possible chance of explosive myself. Hazard seems to be showing what a good option he can be lately.. not to mention they are due a couple pens which he will be taking. Give him 2 goals in a game and that can turn into dynamite real quick.
    Him or Costa for their good run of fixtures for me.

    Thanks for this TM.

  5. Licious Lizard
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    Very interesting article, thank you for the work put into it.

    Whether you choose to go with consistency or explosiveness, I would have liked to have had PPG as an additional information.

  6. John t penguin
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    great article
    wonder if you could incorporate my amateur attempts at trying to find patterns. If there is a way to show patterns for individuals and relative to perceived easy fixtures. From past comments I would suggest its swapping the big name players or resisting temptation that make good manager great

    1. tm245
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 6 months ago

      The search for patterns is my next step.

      1, tracking their performances so far to see how predictable they have been based on some of the most common FFS measures. Who are who we thought they were, to quote the late NFL coach Dennis Green?

      2, looking at the double ups of the most popular attacks to see how Liverpool, Man City, Arsenal, Chelsea teammates are performing with each other.

      This will take a bit of time so I hope I can get it done while the international break is going.

  7. tm245
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    Cheers for the replies. I tried to avoid a conclusion about whether consistency or explosiveness is the better tactic, since it really is up to the individual manager.

    A few comments:

    -- Costa seems a no brainer as far as consistency of strong returns, and is close to fixture proof right now. Another thing to think about is that he also passes the eye test for explosiveness, in that he is getting plenty of chances. On several occasions, his 7-9 pointers could easily have been 12-15.

    -- Hazard is more complicated in my opinion. Many of us have forgotten/forgiven his abject stretch this season because he gave us that glorious 19 pointer, but he was a soul crusher for several weeks as well, and very few people accurately predicted his drop him in form until a few blanks made us think he was last season's Hazard again. It would be hilarious to trawl these forums over the first three months to see how volatile opinions about and declarations of Hazard have been.

    -- In my opinion, the Chelsea juggernaut overall needs to prove itself on the road before they can be seen as fixture proof. Many of us are rhapsodizing about the change in formation and belief that Conte has instilled, but is it also a product of comfortable home form?

    -- the last thing that struck me is my own decision making regarding the Liverpool players, considering I always favor explosiveness and differentials over consistency and security. I have doubled up since gw6, and while that has been quite a boost for my OR, I have not been able to choose between them so I have avoided captaining either of them for fear of picking the wrong one.
    During the heyday of SaS, I often had a triple up in attack and was happy to autocaptain Suarez (besides a certain DGW when I went Gerrard for flair and he missed one PK then gave Sturridge another when he was on a hatty, not that I'm bitter). Obviously none of their midfielders are at that all time great level, but I wonder if I am missing a trick here.
    Yes it would feel awful if I captained one of the Brazilians and he or both blanked while Mane/Lallana brought home the points, but I have actually invested so much already in a probable Liverpool profit with the double up, that I should maybe play the long game with confidence. This would entail a commitment to captain Coutinho pretty regularly since the odds are in my favor that he will be a likely points scorer if Liverpool do score, especially since Firmino covers me to a certain extent with a Coutinho blank.
    They are two of the seven best attackers but I have avoiding the captaincy telling myself the double up is enough, but that has come at the expense of several hauls when they looked promising.

    Finally, I am intrigued by the calls for a PPG approach or inclusion. What exactly would that look like? Not quite sure how PPG relates here, so I would like to hear more.

    1. Spreadsheet
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 6 months ago

      As a frequent advocate for PPG/PP90, I don't see the relevance of it here either. I guess the suggestion is to take account of those players who have had reduced opportunities, but done well despite it (Alonso/Chadli/Slimani) - but I think you already have! If you were looking to come up with a 'score' for them, you'd maybe consider basing the returns on the basis of opportunities. But as you're just stating facts, and not really making any judgement, I don't think there's much more to add.

  8. Rains of Castamere
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    As soon as I bring Costa in, I just know he'll bring home a captaincy return of 2 points and be suspended the following GW.

  9. the Penman
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    So...Hazard when Chelsea are at home, and Costa or Liverpool when a Chelsea are away?

  10. tisza
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    it obviously has to be measured over a decent period of time.
    The other point is that players more prone to explosive returns are probably likely to be returning higher bonus points - then doubled up due to captaincy.
    One of the barbs thrown at Costa captaincy in previous seasons was that he just didn't seem to pick up bonus points.

  11. Amateur Pundit Zan
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    IMO, without any research, the answer is predictable explosiveness aka flat track bullies for their great fixtures, otherwise good ppg which can be achieved both consistently or explosively.

  12. jacknap
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    I think it is time for triple Liverpool midfield. Some like coutinho and firmino have been fairly consistent and explosive. Mane mostly explosive but not consistent and lallana somewhat consistent and sometimes explosive.
    My choice is lallana, cout and firmino. 1 arsenal mid and another outlier like son or snoddy or Allen.

  13. jacknap
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    Btw forgot to mention hazard...so 3 Liverpool, hazard and 1 arsenal till December. So no space for outliers.

  14. Stat Sloth
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    Hi there, TM245. Just wanted to make sure that the underlining of some players had no hidden meaning. I read through the article, but the underlining, and lacking explanation of it, kept bugging me till the end.

    Other than that, a great read for a Saturday morning (",)

    (Thanks to you, I'm now looking at Chadli, Alonso and Kane for the upcoming weeks)

    1. tm245
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 6 months ago

      I think they are being underlined for autocorrect on the original document, we needed to use snapshots from that document as the tables weren't readable otherwise.

      Those three could be the differentials that emerge over the next several weeks, for sure. Chadli looks like a great gamble in particular.

      1. Stat Sloth
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 6 months ago

        Noted. Good to know I didn't miss out on anything =)

  15. Pirlø's Pen
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    Brunt of McAuley?

    1. Heavy Data
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 months ago

      Brunt for me

  16. tm245
    • 14 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    I think I've figure out the method for Part 2. It will involve looking back at a variety of factors but will just take some time to convert the data into a rating system.

    Hoping I can channel my normal weekend FPL/FFS time into getting it done for the first 10 players:
    Hazard, Coutinho, Sanchez, Firmino, Mane, De Bruyne, Walcott
    Costa, Lukaku, Aguero

  17. Please Help I Don't Kn…
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    Short question, since Sanchez is doubtful and rather expensive, I was think of bringing in Snodgrass. I know it's a bit of a gamble, but worth a try?

    1. Heavy Data
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 6 months ago

      He's got some nice fixtures and if Hull score he has something to do with it, most of the time. I have him in my team in place of Allen for the coming weeks

  18. Please Help I Don't Kn…
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    Alright, thanks.

    • 12 Years
    9 years, 6 months ago

    I'm still yet to be convinced explosiveness and consistency are two competing traits. In the long run better players will more consistently produce returns and more frequently produce explosive returns.

    Looking for meaning in patterns of returns over an 11 week sample is pointless IMO, even over 38 or 76 games I'm sceptical. That some players come across as consistent or explosive over such a small sample is much more likely to be the product of randomness than to have any meaning behind it.

    Look at your best players, look at their opponents, look at whether they're home or away and then pick the best combination of these factors that you've got.

    1. tm245
      • 14 Years
      9 years, 6 months ago

      I appreciate what you're saying in the first two paragraphs but the point of the search for the patterns is to push back against the conventional wisdom of the third paragraph and see if any outliers exist so far. How is best determined? Who are the flat track bullies? Who are the players who do well home and away? When do these players explode versus return at a lesser rate?

      The folllow up work willl likely strike you in a similar fashion, so fair enough if it too is unconvincing.