Fixtures
16 February 2018 599 comments
Paul Paul
Share:

As discussed in yesterday’s article, the forthcoming two rounds of FA Cup fixtures will impact heavily on the Premier League schedules for Gameweeks 31 and 35 respectively.

The Premier League teams who advance past the FA Cup fifth round – which gets underway this evening – and make it to the quarter-finals are set to blank in Gameweek 31.

Meanwhile, those who clinch a place in the semi-finals will also be without a fixture in Gameweek 35.

New to Fantasy Premier League (FPL) for this season, the Free Hit Chip looks tailor-made as a means to cope with these reduced sets of matches.

We’ll be looking at the strategies involved when wielding this chip as we attempt to navigate this tricky part of the season.

Having looked over the merits of using a Free Hit Chip in Gameweek 31 yesterday, we now turn our attention to what has emerged as the favoured tactic – the plan to hold for now and instead activate in Gameweek 35.

To follow, we’ll also roll out the third article in this series, which will attempt to aid those FPL managers who have already deployed their Free Hit chip.

The Fixtures

We currently have four league fixtures set to go ahead in Gameweek 35.

Everton vs Newcastle
Arsenal vs West Ham
Stoke vs Burnley
Watford vs Crystal Palace

And here’s the FA Cup Fifth Round draw, with two matches getting underway this evening.

Leicester vs Sheffield United
Chelsea vs Hull
Sheffield Wednesday vs Swansea
West Brom vs Southampton
Brighton vs Coventry
Huddersfield vs Man United
Rochdale vs Spurs
Wigan vs Man City

Of the remaining six Gameweek 35 matches still at risk, four of them require both sides involved to be knocked out of the FA Cup – either in the fifth round or quarter-finals stage – for the league fixture to stay intact.

These are:

Leicester vs Southampton
Chelsea vs Huddersfield
Man City vs Swansea
Brighton v Spurs

However, there are two FA Cup scenarios which require a defeat for just one of the Premier League sides involved – either in the fifth round or quarter-finals – to impact on Gameweek 35.

If Man United either lose away to Huddersfield or in the last eight, then the Red Devils will travel to Bournemouth in Gameweek 35.

And if West Brom are defeated by Southampton – a team they’ve lost twice to already this term – or in the last eight, then the Baggies entertain Liverpool in Gameweek 35.

The Gameweek 35 Free Hit – The Pros

One of the main advantages of playing the Free Hit chip in Gameweek 35 is that the very nature of semi-finals means there can only be four teams involved.

Therefore, even if that quartet are all top-flight teams, there can only be a maximum of four matches postponed – or, in other words, a minimum of six Gameweek 35 matches going ahead. That should offer us a wider pool of talent to recruit from with the Free Hit.

Again, your approach will likely depend on whether you have the second Wildcard available.

With the Wildcard still in hand, you could plan to deploy this in Gameweek 32 – prior to the international break. This would also allow you to benefit from a 15-day gap between deadlines, granting extra thinking time and perhaps more potential to play the market for price rises.

The alternative is to delay the Wildcard until Gameweek 33, though that will kill the potential to carry over two free transfers prior to Gameweek 34 (if you build to bank your Gameweek 33 transfer). It’s arguable whether that counters an extra week of minimising injury or suspension, or whether having two Free Transfers on the eve of the double Gameweek is more powerful.

With that decided, managers can then focus their current transfer policy on a mix of players with strong fixtures between Gameweeks 28-31, including a range of acquisitions with the blanks in Gameweek 31 in mind.

This strategy will task managers with setting their ambitions for Gameweek 31, depending on the number of fixtures taking place.

Those who already own a handful of key assets – such as Mohamed Salah, Roberto Firmino, Virgil van Dijk, Sadio Mane, Theo Walcott, Oumar Niasse and Xherdan Shaqiri – may feel content to avoid the use of further transfers on active players. That allows the freedom to concentrate instead on options with strong fixtures from Gameweeks 28-30 – with Spurs assets presenting obvious attractions.

The strategy then expands to play the Wildcard in Gameweek 32, clearing out unwanted assets left over from the Gameweek 31 preparations. The focus of this Wildcard would be to recruit players guaranteed two fixtures in both Gameweek 34 and in Gameweek 37.

Gameweek 32 falls after the Quarter-Finals which means we will know the semi-final line-up since no replays will be played. This means we will be aware of the teams and players who will sit out Gameweek 35 and likely handed another double-header in Gameweek 37.

This then adds extra value to the Free Hit, since it allows recruitment for the Bench Boost in Gameweek 34 with total disregard for the blanks that immediately follow in Gameweek 35.

If the Free Hit has been used, or is deployed in Gameweek 31, then any Wildcard recruitment and transfers for the Bench Boost in Gameweek 34 will have to strike a balance between those teams with two fixtures and those missing Gameweek 35.

This restricts the freedom with the Wildcard and transfers heading into Gameweek 34; it could, therefore, make the Bench Boost somewhat less effective.

Without the Free Hit chip to play in Gameweek 35, it is more difficult to have a strong full Bench Boosted 15 man squad in Gameweek 34, while also fielding a full XI in Gameweek 35. It can be done by spending points on transfers or by focusing only on those teams that are knocked out in the quarter-finals. However, this, in turn, will impact on the strength of the Gameweek 37 squad.

That may even convince some managers to reverse their strategy, deploying the Bench Boost in Gameweek 37 and the Triple Captain in 34. The main issue here is that teamsheets around Gameweek 37 are more difficult to predict: nailing a captain could be a lot easier than maximising 15 players to play twice in quick succession.

If you don’t have a Wildcard, holding the Free Hit Chip until Gameweek 35 rather than deploying in Gameweek 31 still looks likely to be the more popular strategy, particularly if only three fixtures remain following the fifth round.

However, these managers must still be wary with Gameweek 31 recruitment. Overload on active Gameweek 31 players and they will likely need to spend points on transfers to speed the transition to double Gameweek 34 and 37 players.

The Gameweek 35 Free Hit – The Cons

If you have all your chips available, the drawbacks of this strategy seem quite minimal.

There are two clear risks involved. For one, you will likely fail to achieve a full XI for Gameweek 31 and therefore run the risk of losing ground should a popular player that you overlook deliver a big score.

This means you have to try to mitigate this risk by acquiring the key targets mentioned. However, there is then the knock-on of being distracted by these players, only to miss out on big scorers in teams that are inactive in Gameweek 31.

Those using the Free Hit in Gameweek 31 have the freedom to exploit favourable schedules for Spurs (STK BOU wba), Burnley (SOT EVE whu) and Swansea (bha WHU hud) for example. If they bring in assets from these teams that fly in the next three Gameweeks, you may need the likes of Walcott and Shaqiri to keep pace over the same spell. Not impossible given their fixtures and form, but a consideration nonetheless.

The scale of the risk involved depends on the number of Gameweek 31 options you already own and the ambitions you set yourself in terms of the sweet spot for active players.

Another potential issue could be that, by Gameweek 35, the landscape in terms of team and player motivation may have shifted.

Of the eight sides guaranteed to feature in Gameweek 35, five of them – Newcastle, Stoke, West Ham, Watford and Crystal Palace – are currently relegation candidates.

If any of these teams have their fate sealed by Gameweek 35, there’s a chance that, with less at stake, their key targets for a Free Hit squad will be less profitable than in Gameweek 31, when there is still very much all to play for.

In Conclusion

As discussed in yesterday’s piece, navigating this period and optimising the Free Hit Chip is relative to a host of factors that each FPL manager needs to consider.

This includes the state of your current squad, the number of chips at your disposal, and the fixtures on offer in both Gameweek 31 and 35.

As mentioned above, the worst-case scenario for Gameweek 35 is six matches. We already know eight teams taking part – Everton, Newcastle, Arsenal, West Ham, Stoke, Burnley, Watford and Crystal Palace – while at least four more sides will be added to that list.

But on the other hand, Gameweek 31 could present just three fixtures.

Essentially, looking at the scenario’s for both Gameweeks, we could have, at the very least, double the number of teams to consider with the Gameweek 35 Free Hit. The theory is that the more options we have at our disposal, the better chance we have of profiting when building a Free Hit squad.

In addition, deploying the Free Hit chip in Gameweek 35 allows for more freedom with Wildcard recruitment in Gameweek 32, which in turn benefits our squads for the Bench Boosted double Gameweek 34 and the late double in Gameweek 37.

This is a very powerful argument in favour of the later Free Hit strategy.

However, a loss for Man United at Huddersfield tomorrow could yet alter our view.

The Red Devils’ trip to West Ham would slot in as the third confirmed fixture for Gameweek 31, bringing both Marko Arnautovic and Alexis Sanchez onto the radar as powerful differentials. That would shift more potential power the way of managers deploying the Free Hit earlier.

The results from the FA Cup fifth round matches will decide matters, with the draw for the quarter-finals on Saturday offering further clarity.

We will be providing a recap of the impact of the fifth round on the Free Hit strategies in our Scout Notes over the weekend.

But for the final part of this FA Cup impact series, we move to assess the state of play and likely strategy for those who have already spent their Free Hit chip.

Paul Is certain he won't make the same mistakes next season. Follow them on Twitter

599 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. FPL_Hazards
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Kane injured ? Hmmmm

    1. Mark
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 19 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Smokescreen for resting him no doubt but, given what has been said, we have to monitor. I kind of remember Poch reassuring us on flu-gate 😉

      1. HurriKane
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Wonder if Az will put his armband on Kane this time round 😉

        HIs logic was many people will not captain Kane so he will be a differential

        1. HurriKane
          • 13 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          when he played TC on flagged kane in spurs dgw earlier

          1. J ⚒ Gimme ur Mané
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            8 years, 5 months ago

            Please can we stop bringing this back up? It hurts 😆

            1. Zladan
              • 8 Years
              8 years, 5 months ago

              Hurts so bad

    2. Fred54
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Scenes / Loud noises / Armchair ankle injury experts a plenty etc.

    3. MTPockets
      8 years, 5 months ago

      And Jesus back in training. Just need a Firmino FA ban for the transfer dilemma hat trick.

    4. Planet Head
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      The bring-in-Vardy and free-hit-GW31 strategy gathers pace..

    5. Duffy Dunk
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      He was moving towards a price rise so as a non owner that's good news

    6. Yozzer
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Poch lies. Instead of just saying we will rest him he will fabricate an injury..i love Poch but don't trust a word he says

  2. RAFA THE GAFFA
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Any boxing fans among the group? Who you fancying for tomorrow’s big one? I’m favouring Groves but it’s a close one

    1. Badger Badger Mushroom Mush…
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      I’ll be there.

      I dislike both.

      But dislike Jnr more. So I’m going for Groves on points.

    2. FPL_Hazards
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Euuuuuuubank

    3. Ógie
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      I think it will go the distance and Groves will win it.

    4. Yozzer
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Yer used to be a huge fan for many many years ( Riddick Bowe, Roy Jones and Floyd being my heros) until i decided it's all about money and manipulation of the results.

      For me it's either Groves knocks him out or Eubank on points. Depends which Groves turns up. I'd probably favour Eubank on points as hes like the Duracell bunny...

      1. RoysCallerAnne
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Very good article and very good hot topic.
        Good job!

        *strokes chin and wonders if I'm morphing into FPL virg...

        1. RoysCallerAnne
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          Reply fail of muchness.

  3. Wildcard GWK 32 v 33
    J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 17 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    I was thinking of playing my wildcard in Gameweek 33 as it is closer to Gameweek 34 when I can use a bench boost. Using it in GWK 33 rather than GWK 32 would in theory give me extra information re line ups and ensure I can maximise that wildcard...basically one less week for injuries and suspensions to happen.

    Why is the concensus to use it in GWK 32 not GWK 33? Are the fixtures that markedly different then?

    1. Badger Badger Mushroom Mush…
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Pool have a decent fixture. With 3 pool it’s worth the extra week wait I think.

      1. Flynny
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        I'll aim for wildcard in 33...

        Guess it just depends how your team looks in 32 and if u can hold out another week

    2. TLF
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Arsenal have Stoke at home in 32 which could be a key fixture.

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 17 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Liverpool away to Palace....we'll already be well stocked up on their players.

        I think waiting may offer more benefit.

        Just curious as to why the assumption from many is that GWK 32 is when a wildcard is best played for those using a FH chip in GWK 35 and Bench Boosting for the Double in GWK 34. GWK 33 makes more sense to me.

        1. Mark
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 19 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          See below. Arguably, having the extra FT even later leading into GW34 is even more handy.

          1. J0E
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 17 Years
            8 years, 5 months ago

            Ah, I see. Well that makes sense.

            So essentially if we use it in GWK 32 we get an extra transfer. If we use it in GWK 33 we don't as the FH chip doesn't count re transfer accumulation.

            The extra transfer angle may sell it for me.

            1. Mark
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 19 Years
              8 years, 5 months ago

              Yeah, a WC kills the second transfer. A pain.

              I'll add that to article - thanks for raising.

              Here's me thinking we'd covered the angles!

          2. Mark
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 19 Years
            8 years, 5 months ago

            Also, Stoke and Everton have terrible fixtures in GW32 so we can clear out Shaqiri and Walcott. Arguably, we can keep Salah in our GW32 WC and use one of the two FT's in 34 to swap him out for the double. Could do the same with another Liverpool attacker I guess.

            Even if we WC in GW33, aren't we going to keep Salah to the last minute?

            1. Badger Badger Mushroom Mush…
              • 9 Years
              8 years, 5 months ago

              Excellent points. Hadn’t crossed my mind for the extra freebie.

              32 it is!

            2. J0E
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 17 Years
              8 years, 5 months ago

              Great. The fact that GWK 32 wildcard actually generates an extra transfer further down the line, whereas the GWK 33 doesn't is huge. Hadn't even occured to me until now.

              1. Mark
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 19 Years
                8 years, 5 months ago

                Well only if you bank in 33. But if you WC in 32, that should be easy enough. He says.

                1. J0E
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 17 Years
                  8 years, 5 months ago

                  I think the key though will be those GWK 35 fixtures.

                  The wildcard is such an important chip- if being used with GWK 35 and 37 in mind then it may well be that teams with a good fixt in GWK 32 are no use..

                  1. Veezeeboy
                    • 13 Years
                    8 years, 5 months ago

                    Arsenal and Liverpool play in 35. So a FH chip could also come in handy for those who are saving it for GW 35

              2. Freddo
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 5 months ago

                I'm not sure why people are obsessed with using the WC in 32 or 33.

                If you've built a team for 31, most of those covering blanks will be active in 35.

                You are allowed to bench 4 of them so no one is forcing you to play all of them, the 3 Liverpool players you have will all be played in the period of 31-35 meaning benching Walcott or Shaqiri is not an issue.

                What I don't understand is, why would you wildcard those players out after 31 (when they can be benched) so you can just waste your FHC in 35 getting them back for one week?

                Surely makes more sense to plan for 31-35 with transfers & then clean up the whole mess in 36 ready for the final DGW when your wildcard can focus on one DGW and give yourself the chance to use that FHC as a more powerful tool in say GW38 as opposed to in 35 when you'll more than likely use it to have the same players as everyone else because the template will be so small.

                It's like these chips have come along and taken away people's desire to get a pen and paper out while forgetting they have the ability to plan through spells like this when they've done it for years successfully.

                1. TorresMagic™
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 17 Years
                  8 years, 5 months ago

                  Bench boost.

                  1. J0E
                    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                    • Has Moderation Rights
                    • 17 Years
                    8 years, 5 months ago

                    Yep this. All about maximising the BB during a week with the most fixtures.

                2. Mark
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 19 Years
                  8 years, 5 months ago

                  A manager carrying GW31 players into 35 presumably won't be bench boosting in GW34.

                  By WC'ing in 32 and making two FT's in 34, a potential 15 man DGW squad can be built.

                  I think a squad built to withstand GW35 might struggle against that.

                  1. Freddo
                    • 9 Years
                    8 years, 5 months ago

                    BB is not attractive in 34 anyway.

                    Liverpool V Bournmouth
                    Hudds V Watford
                    Swansea V Everton
                    West Ham V Stoke.

                    You would have wasted transfers getting these players in who will all be available in 35 and have decent enough fixtures in 34, if you play 3 Liverpool players as standard, you'll only have 12 Double players anyway, what's wrong with having 6/7/8 double players + 3 Liverpool in 34 and going full on in the 37 double because by then, the players from Stoke, Everton and Watford have no purpose, they do in 35.

                    Imagine being able to bench boost in 37, spread all your funds across 15 players in 37 for the BB and then use the FHC IN 38 to get the money off your bench for a blockbuster final week?

                    Too many closed minds with this FHC, GW31 and GW35 are perhaps the worst time to use it as most without it will plan for 8 players anyway so your advantage will only be 3 players they don't have and I'm guessing it will be the 3 players they didn't feel were worth getting or they would have.

                    1. J0E
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • Has Moderation Rights
                      • 17 Years
                      8 years, 5 months ago

                      I'd keep Salah SGWK or not.

                    2. Mark
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • Has Moderation Rights
                      • 19 Years
                      8 years, 5 months ago

                      But FH and BB are dependent on the ability to hit the selection of 11-15 players spot on.

                      You'd be doing that in GW37 and 38 when predicting teamsheets is very difficult.

                      If the top four race and relegation battle is still on, then fine. But it might not be.

                      GW34 there should be fewer doubts on any team resting and rotating or lacking motivation.

                      1. Freddo
                        • 9 Years
                        8 years, 5 months ago

                        The flip side to that is in 34 you will have to throw out single players who have every chance of coming back to bite you because you're forcing the wildcard/b2b week, guessing most will keep Salah but are you really going to bin Firmino H to Bournmouth or Walcott A to Swansea (even Shaqiri at West Ham, Doucoure at Hudds have potential) if they are hitting numbers and have a fixture the following week? Walcott H to Newcastle in 35 looks attractive straight away.

                        Spurs and Leicester players killed the DGW 2 years ago when people got rid of them to maximise the BB because they ran riot the week before, people will bottle losing Firmino and all if they are producing.

                        Liverpool, Everton, Watford & Stoke have opportunity for points in 34 and 35, over the years these BB weeks have been more about the players you lose as much as the players you get in, Kane away at Stoke killed many DGWs before it even started.

                        Speculating on which double week will be better other is pointless as you have no idea where the fixtures will be plotted.

                      2. Freddo
                        • 9 Years
                        8 years, 5 months ago

                        With regards to rotation, this year is quite unique, there is no title race, the top 5 look locked in, all 6 English teams have a strong chance of progressing in Europe, nailing the team sheets will carry equal risks in 34 as it would 37.

                      3. Mark
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • Has Moderation Rights
                        • 19 Years
                        8 years, 5 months ago

                        But that's the case when you use the BB in a DGW regardless of when the GW drops. Unless you're not BB for a DGW, there's always that risk of single GW players stinging.

                        You can keep Walcott and Shaqiri for GW34 but then you have to hold them in GW32 and GW33 and fixtures are awful so that surely counters their better fixtures in GW34 - Stoke have Arsenal and Spurs. Everton have City and Liverpool.

                      4. Freddo
                        • 9 Years
                        8 years, 5 months ago

                        Walcott and Shaqiri having awful fixs in 32 and 33 is not really an issue, most squads will carry 3 Liverpool and a load of players who blank in 31, they are easily benched unless you have a horrific bench.

                        An example, my 8 for 31 are...

                        Pickford, Walcott, Dacoure, Shaqiri, Van Djik, Salah, Firmino + Wilson (or a striker in 31 if he don't have a fixture)

                        The rest who have doubles who I'll retain and play between 32 and 35 are...

                        Alonso, Otamendi, Mee, Sterling, Jones, Kane and either Pope or Heaton.

                        I'm set up to play those 6 + van Djik, Salah and Firmino meaning there's only 1 of Sterling, Shaqiri or Docoure needed.

                        More money on the bench until the WC allows me to get through it, don't see their awful fixtures being an issue when only 1 will have to play if they all stay, transfers allow Arsenal players to come into the mix which can't be forgotten.

                      5. Freddo
                        • 9 Years
                        8 years, 5 months ago

                        *Walcott not Sterling, Sterling will be playing in the 6.

                    3. Mark
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • Has Moderation Rights
                      • 19 Years
                      8 years, 5 months ago

                      The Free Hit in GW35 is not all about maximising the score in that GW, it's about being able to build for a BB in GW34 without any consideration for the blanks.

                      That seems quite powerful to me, but it depends on how the fixtures fall and who has the GW35 blanks.

                      1. HNI
                        • 13 Years
                        8 years, 5 months ago

                        Hey Mark FA cup draw is on Sunday too right? So we can get good chance of possible teams making it to semis?

                      2. Freddo
                        • 9 Years
                        8 years, 5 months ago

                        It's a lazy way of approaching this and arguably a waste of a chip, ask yourself how you coped in the 10+ years you played the game before this chip was invented and if you struggled.

                        I'd argue that the chips were designed to give you a one off rank boost not go for a template selection in a tiny week and minimise the chance of an explosion because it's convenient or you can't be bothered to figure it out the old skool way.

                      3. Mark
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • Has Moderation Rights
                        • 19 Years
                        8 years, 5 months ago

                        It's the first time we've had the FH chip. We're not being definite on whether this is the right strategy - it's a popular theory and you're right to challenge it.

                        But equally, I don't think you can be so definite in your appraisal of it being "lazy" and a "waste".

                        Nobody really knows but the theory looks sound and, of course, this is part of "fun" at this stage of the season to speculate on this kind of thing.

                        Let's see what the FAC give us.

                      4. Mark
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • Has Moderation Rights
                        • 19 Years
                        8 years, 5 months ago

                        It's Saturday night I believe. Strangely.

                      5. FantasyFootballSprout
                        • 8 Years
                        8 years, 5 months ago

                        When else do you suggest we use this chip? There’s 10 GWKs left and most of us still have all 4 chips. Time is running out and this is the best plan I’ve seen.

                      6. Gilles
                        • 12 Years
                        8 years, 5 months ago

                        I'm actually pondering the merit of before 34 depending on the fixture and my team, FHC in 34, WC in 36 and TC in 37.
                        Depending on the fixture list, I quite like the idea...

                      7. @FPL_liverbird (liverpoolfa…
                        • 10 Years
                        8 years, 5 months ago

                        Not sure about that, what about BB, already used it?

                      8. Gilles
                        • 12 Years
                        8 years, 5 months ago

                        BB before 34 depending on my team and the fixture.
                        Never liked the idea of losing BB in a DGW. More powerful chips to use in these gw...

                3. luckyflames1897
                  • 15 Years
                  8 years, 5 months ago

                  It’s obvious. Bench boost

        2. Veezeeboy
          • 13 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          Also International Break in 32. So we can catch some price rises and can transfer out players who are getting injured in the break easily. Also benefits the team for GW 32

          1. Mark
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 19 Years
            8 years, 5 months ago

            Yep, that's mentioned in the article.

          2. J0E
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 17 Years
            8 years, 5 months ago

            the days of catching price rises from international breaks are long gone. No advantage whatsoever if this season's other breaks are anything to go by.

            1. Mark
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 19 Years
              8 years, 5 months ago

              Yeah, probably. But those without a WC will be stocking up for GW34 maybe? Not sure on those numbers, but there will be some.

            2. Ramboros
              • 14 Years
              8 years, 5 months ago

              The international break means 2 extra games for injuries, 2 extra weeks for recovery, and lots of travelling for some players.

              1. Mark
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 19 Years
                8 years, 5 months ago

                They are friendlies, a lot of key players will stay at home I imagine.

            3. Veezeeboy
              • 13 Years
              8 years, 5 months ago

              Yeah possibly but still it's a slight advantage. And also the injured players in the break could be easily transferred out
              Hopefully Mark's GOAT doesn't get injured

        3. RedLightning
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 16 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          *Do you mean for those using Bench Boost in GW34 and Free Hit in GW35?

    3. Mark
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 19 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      It has merit but if you WC in 33, you can't carry 2 FT's into GW34 since the WC wipes out carried over transfers.

      If you WC in 32 and save in 33, you have 2 FT's for 34 with the extra info you mention but even later info!

      1. Mark
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 19 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Lol..I'd best add this to article! There was so much to cover.

    4. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Impossible to know yet without knowing what your WC team is going to look like, which in turn depends on the blanks/DGWs - I'm keeping an open mind to both options.

    5. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      To offload likes of Pickford/Walcott(MANC), Shaqiri/Beuer(ars) I guess...

      1. I Member
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        You can bench the four of them or bench three and sell one.

    6. I Member
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Was just looking at this myself and I'm also favouring 33. The fixtures in 32 look reasonable enough for my team and I know I'll want Spurs and Chelsea assets for the DGWs but don't particularly want to load up on them when they play each other in GW32. Triple Pool, which everyone will have for GW31, is a decent foundation for GW32 as they have a good fixture that week. West Brom, Bournemouth, Huddersfield and Southampton also have okay fixtures in 32 and could potentially play in GW31..

    7. Rhinos
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      i just think its wrong basing our wildcard on how best to utilse the other chips, wc the most powerful weapon in our artillery.

      1. Mark
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 19 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Regardless of chips, isn't 32, when we know the semi-final line-up and we have the break and 15 days to plan, the best time anyway?

        1. Rhinos
          • 12 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          it would be if I still had it 😆
          as always it depends on how your team looks right now

          1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
            • 11 Years
            8 years, 5 months ago

            There's a shift within 3 GWs between the biggest blank week of the season and (likely) the biggest DGW of the season - seems a no-brainer to WC during this time unless there is extreme circumstances?

            1. Rhinos
              • 12 Years
              8 years, 5 months ago

              does itchytriggerfingeritus count as extreme circumstances?

    8. J0E
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 17 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Although, thinking about it if you wildcard GWK 33, BB GWK 34, use FH GWK 35, save a transfer GWK 36 you could go into GWK 37 with two frees - which could be even more valuable as we will know more about possible Europe rotation then.

      1. Veezeeboy
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        BB GW 35?
        It is a blank week, The bench mostly will be 0 points

      2. Mark
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 19 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        It's only the FH and WC that kills the extra transfer. BB doesn't I believe so you can carry over from GW35.

        1. Veezeeboy
          • 13 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          It all depends on Tomorrow's FA cup tie. A few upsets and all our plannings go down the drain

        2. J0E
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 17 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          Be good to get some clarity on this. Really crucial to using hits. Why does the BB not kill the transfer as the others do? Surely would make sense for all chips or none of them to kill a transfer to make it consistent.

          🙂 I keep finding new permutations. Head spinning.

          1. Veezeeboy
            • 13 Years
            8 years, 5 months ago

            FH and WC depends on the transfers. BB and TC dont depend on the trades we make so it wont kill it basically

            1. J0E
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 17 Years
              8 years, 5 months ago

              WC but not FH surely as whatever transfers made that week are wiped? FH makes no difference to your team's set up and transfers outside of that one FH chip week.

              1. Jude Rooney
                • 13 Years
                8 years, 5 months ago

                Can see your logic on that one

              2. TorresMagic™
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 17 Years
                8 years, 5 months ago

                2 chips involve transfers. The other 2 don't.

                1. J0E
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 17 Years
                  8 years, 5 months ago

                  But see above.... FH chip only involves transfers for that one isolated week. What you do in FH doesn't effect your team afterwards.

                  1. TorresMagic™
                    • Has Moderation Rights
                    • 17 Years
                    8 years, 5 months ago

                    It's a one GW wildcard. Everyone would get 2 transfers after a FH and how do people with 2 FTs feel if they FH as they won't get 3.

                  2. TorresMagic™
                    • Has Moderation Rights
                    • 17 Years
                    8 years, 5 months ago

                    Please note that when playing either a Wildcard or your Free Hit chip, any saved free transfers will be lost. You will be back to the usual 1 free transfer the following Gameweek.

          2. Jude Rooney
            • 13 Years
            8 years, 5 months ago

            Why should it - no changes necessary

        3. Yozzer
          • 8 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          Christ I never knew that. Would be good to get some clarification on this if possible.

          You just know tomorrow is going to wreck everyone's plans..guarenteed 😆

    9. DJ1000
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      I am dead ending in gw31 and will wc in gw32. Some teams like arsenal have great double fixtures where I can get likes of Mkhitaryan auba and monreal in. Can steal a march on anyone who waits. Plus can’t see a smooth transition from gw31 to 32 unless you are free hitting

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 17 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        That is very persuasive too.

        All depends though whether we want Arsenal for GWK 34 and 37 though I guess.

        1. Veezeeboy
          • 13 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          no Dgw for Arsenal in 37 as they will play in gw 35 🙂

          1. J0E
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 17 Years
            8 years, 5 months ago

            So loading up on Arsenal players if Free hitting in GWK 35 is not ideal. Hmmm.

            1. Veezeeboy
              • 13 Years
              8 years, 5 months ago

              Get 1 or 2 Arsenal players for 34 probably. They play both in Away in GW 34 so its not a concern for now unless they show some away form.

              1. J0E
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • Has Moderation Rights
                • 17 Years
                8 years, 5 months ago

                But can they compete with DGWK players? Probably not.

                1. Veezeeboy
                  • 13 Years
                  8 years, 5 months ago

                  Probably Monreal is the best option. He is getting some attacking returns and also can get a cs in that dgw

          2. 1Banksy
            • 10 Years
            8 years, 5 months ago

            Worth noting the tactical advantage in WC 33 as can see what rivals do in money leagues.

            1. J0E
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • Has Moderation Rights
              • 17 Years
              8 years, 5 months ago

              Another great point. With rivals wildcarding GWK 32 we see their side and can block good ones and get better differentials.

              I think my conclusion is that the argument for GWK 32 or 33 wildcard is certainly not cut and dry and there are strong arguments for either week.

              FA Cup this weekend will tell us more.

              1. OldBenKenobi
                • 9 Years
                8 years, 5 months ago

                Extra info vs extra transfer (if you decide to roll it)

                1. J0E
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • Has Moderation Rights
                  • 17 Years
                  8 years, 5 months ago

                  Cheers, that sums it up perfectly.

                  I do wonder if extra info could be worth more.

                  Extra transfer is essentially saving four points. Extra info could make more.

                  So the ceiling of GWK 32 wildcard is specifically 4 pts regarding the extra transfer

                  The ceiling of GWK 33 wildcard could be far higher if there happens to be lots of new information, suspensions, injuries, rotation etc.

                  1. OldBenKenobi
                    • 9 Years
                    8 years, 5 months ago

                    Also important to note that a lot of people will probably WC on 32 over the 2 week break so prices won’t probably move much.

                    1. J0E
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • Has Moderation Rights
                      • 17 Years
                      8 years, 5 months ago

                      Yep, I raised that earlier. This season has shown already that there is no price advantage wildcarding in a break.

                      1. Mark
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • Has Moderation Rights
                        • 19 Years
                        8 years, 5 months ago

                        Sure, but we haven't had a scenario whereby managers without the WC are driven to load up on DGW assets. A bigger number of rises and falls over GW32 and 33 are very possible I think.

                        You might be okay WC'ing asap for GW33 but I think there will be a good deal of rises between GW31 and 32.

                        Players that blank in 31 will likely go down off the back of sales heading into the GW31 deadline, so there's a chance of snapping them up at a cheaper price if we WC in 32.

                      2. J0E
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • Has Moderation Rights
                        • 17 Years
                        8 years, 5 months ago

                        You know my views on the FPL transfer market 😉

                        It's a beast - can't be tamed, can't be second guessed. 🙂

                      3. JurgenRodgers
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 9 Years
                        8 years, 5 months ago

                        As a Free hit user, so looking forward to part 3 Article

            2. Veezeeboy
              • 13 Years
              8 years, 5 months ago

              By this point if we are able to field a decent 11 for gw 35 with FH then it could be used in 38. We can either get differentials to chase points or Block some of the players to not lose points

              1. Veezeeboy
                • 13 Years
                8 years, 5 months ago

                Without*

          3. RedLightning
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • Has Moderation Rights
            • 16 Years
            8 years, 5 months ago

            If ARS have a blank in GW31, then their GW31 match could be moved to either GW34 or GW37.

            Also, if MCI draw in the 5th round, then MCI v ARS could be moved from GW28 to GW34 or GW37.

    10. @fpl_phenom
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Because if you’ve put in a lot of non blankers you may want to “fix” you team straight after

      1. DJ1000
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        I have made drafts for gws 32-34. Arsenal have 2 great hime games in 32 & 33 so Monreal Mkhi and Auba could enable me to steal a march in gw32 and they have decent fixtures in gw34 too if things go as we expect. Chelsea and spurs play each other but Man U at home to Swansea in gw32 so Sanchez my come into my thinking. If I play my Wildcard in gw32 it will be to maximise my points in gw32 have a great team for gw33 and have 2 fts for gw34 in case I need them. Also looking to Bb in gw35. Think you have to be open minded and see what works best but this is my plan for now. I think the wc should be used for maximum benefit not just for the dbgws. If someone can see my team in gw33 then I can still make 2 changes in gw34 for differentials. I prefer to go on the front foot

        1. DJ1000
          • 11 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          I meant bb in gw34

    11. The Rumour Mill
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Great discussion above, very interesting angle on the saved transfer aspect.

      There's also the simple benefit to consider that by WC in 32 rather than 33 you gain the benefit of playing your WC for an additional gameweek 🙂

    12. Holy See
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Jayz I'm glad I read this before I had a few drinks.
      The BB, the WC,
      The FH, & the TC,
      Bank the FT,
      Bin Shaqiri,
      SGW, mind your chips.
      Get to grips
      With this FPL language
      This team I gotta manage,
      Brain is fried,
      But thanks for the guide.

    13. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      It seems I am in the minority with FH31, WC36, BB37.

      A WC BB combo team is always a bit of a compromise with cash spread across the squad and a more expensive bench than normal

      The issue with a WC in 32 is that you then have to carry that squad and ££££ bench through to 37, and with the FH in 35 that gives you just 3 transfers (FH in 35) up to 37.

      My FH in 31 allows me to plan from now with about 6 transfers for DGW34, the BGW 35 has 6 games (minimum) and will give me 11 good players with Liverpool and maybe two other big teams not blanking

      I think I will avoid the FFS herd this time 🙂

      1. Chenku╰☆╮
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        I just posted this below.. typical ffs to just create a template with wc fh Bb and TC usage..

        1. Hotdogs for Tea
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          I agree, if the FAC results go as i suspect then I will only have 3 players in 31 and there is no point in doing anything but FH in 31, keeping my 12 players that have double game weeks and using transfers as normal on route to FGW34.

    14. Chenku╰☆╮
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Again can you put a disclaimer that this is based on your teams.. FH 31 is still in play for people who haven’t planned or just have a different team to the so called template.. the fixtures in 31 are really few anyway.. this means FH31, save fts TC 34, wc 36 is looking very doable and much better imo..

    15. melvinmbabazi
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      WC GW32 would be the consensus prior to the international break. This would also allow us to benefit from a 15-day gap between deadlines, granting extra thinking time and perhaps more potential to play the market for price rises and get rid of the deadwood from GW 31.

  4. Flynny
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    What's the view on a salah firmino mane Liverpool triple up?

    From the west ham game through to gw31.

    Firmino and mane look ideal replacements for kun and son who will need to exit me team....cheers

    1. The Nuttmxn
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      I like it, but it's certainly ballsy.

    2. Rhinos
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      its almost as though Liverpool never underwhelm at home to 'lesser' sides

      1. Naboo
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Will they ever learn. VVD better pick imo

    3. Naboo
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Why getting rid of Son?

      1. Flynny
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Son seems to be a rotation threat now with lamela getting time and moura just signed.

        We will never know from one game to the next is son is going to start.....

    4. @fpl_phenom
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Why does Kun have to go?

      1. Flynny
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Jesus is already back in training and likely to be ready to start matches by the time city next play in the league in 10 days time.....

  5. tm245
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Cue a bunch of posts linking to other sites and podcasts trying to cover the same hypotheticals. I think the over/under will be around 8 - I'll take the over.

    Is that why the articles are coming out before the matches that will determine the strategies are actually played? It seems a bit premature unless neutrals are using these as a guide for whom to support this weekend based on FPL schedule implications?

    1. 1Banksy
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      I want Huddersfield to win tonight to throw the cat amongst the pigeons for the Free Hit 31. We have all navigated BB and TC between semi finals before.

      1. OldBenKenobi
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        If Huddersfield win surely people are less likely to FH as they will probably own some United assets already?

  6. jamie1972
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Pope (Elliot)

    Jones - Otta - Hegazi - Ogbonna (Mbemba)

    Salah - Sterling - Shaquiri - Lingard - Richarlison

    Agruero - Kane - Wilson

    2 ft's, so:

    Otta > VVD
    Aguero > Firmino

    For free, then Lingard > KDB next week

    Seem legit?

    Or swerve KDB to mahrez and upgrade Richa to Mki maybe?

    Help...

    1. Boxwoods
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Yeah, mate, do it. I like KDB option, but you can monitor Mahrez and Mkhi and make the call that week.

    2. Naboo
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Same moves I'm considering, but obviously wait for cup results

  7. Jafooli
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Need a picture of Billy & Kane in a Swansea hotel with an Xmas tree in the background asap.

  8. Jafooli
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Apparently in addition to the four WBA players in the stolen Spanish taxi, Odemwinge was also found in the trunk.

    1. Rhinos
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      they stole an elephant too?

    2. Defcons are for Kinnear
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Slow day

    3. Ógie
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      😆

      Is that what happened hijacked a taxi after a few pints?

      1. Norman Conquest
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        yea stole it from a drive through mcdonalds

        1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
          • 11 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          Allegedly (with the allegation coming from a dodgy taxi driver called Domingo)

          1. Norman Conquest
            • 12 Years
            8 years, 5 months ago

            ha ha

          2. Ógie
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 13 Years
            8 years, 5 months ago

            I cant throw stones i have done some terrible things that i am not proud of in taxis in my time.

            Domingo is in for a big payday the sweep this one under the carpet.
            Any idea of which players were involved?

            1. The Bandit
              • 15 Years
              8 years, 5 months ago

              They were senior players, that’s all we know. Pardew presser coming up

            2. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
              • 11 Years
              8 years, 5 months ago

              Dunno - sounds a load of bllx to me anyway, but hope I'm wrong for the lolz.

            3. Norman Conquest
              • 12 Years
              8 years, 5 months ago

              there is a few names floating around on twitter but apparently they only did it so they could get 3 points

              1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
                • 11 Years
                8 years, 5 months ago

                You're the one who needs a taxi for that joke 😉

                1. Norman Conquest
                  • 12 Years
                  8 years, 5 months ago

                  i'll get my coat

                  1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
                    • 11 Years
                    8 years, 5 months ago

                    😛

  9. Defcons are for Kinnear
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    What's the update to the site?

  10. Ógie
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Not that i use the members area as much as i probably should but it is annoying that i have to log in again to access it.
    I dont have to log in again to go back to the main site and i would like if it was the same going from here into the members area.

    Maybe this could be streamlined in a future update?

  11. Jude Rooney
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Forgive me if this has already been muted but what about my alternative strategy.

    Concentrate on GW31 players ( once draw is known focus on ones that also play GW35.

    Use free hit in GW34 to get a full squad of DGWs

    WC GW36 get squad full of DGWs

    Bench Boost GW37

    1. Pasqualinho
      • 17 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Yes - I think there will be some teams out there that suit this strategy. If you have a half-decent team for GW31 then you shouldn't have a problem with the GW35 blanks too. Which means your free hit is not best used in a blank week - therefore a DGW is just as good an opportunity to use it.

      1. Jude Rooney
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Cheers - just dawned on me yesterday. Be clearer early next week

    2. Boxwoods
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      I am also looking into something like this that uses FH for a DGW. Due to peculiarities of my ML (which is a hybrid of the regular and draft games in which mgrs can't poach players already on another team - unless using FH chip), the ability to use the FH for a DGW in which a high-performing player I don't have (think Mo Salah) has two matches seems very appealing. A problem I haven't yet sorted, though, is I will also want to use Bench Boost and TC chis during DGWs. Is there any prospect of more than two DGWs?

      1. Jude Rooney
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Don't think so

        1. Boxwoods
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          Hmmm. I may do the FH for DGW regardless and just find a non DGW with favorable fixture for one of my stars to do the TC. Hopefully all will be clearer next week.

      2. Naboo
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Yes if City draw with Wigan this weekend

  12. Karan_G14
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Is there any defender worth owning for blank GW31 expect Liverpool given the current fixtures and the ones likely to go through (assuming the favourites qualify)?

  13. Stat Sloth
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    WBA press conference postponed for an hour so far. Wonder why....

    1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Taxi company demanding a large deposit

  14. HNI
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Just dont understand why the mods can wait till Sunday to put an article? Its so much efforts and could have been better used if done on Sunday once most matches except Mancity would have been done. Wait till monday and even that would have been over

    1. HNI
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Cant*

    2. Ógie
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      I think the two articles were well timed and gives food for thought coming into the FA Cup fixtures.

      They are also great to direct people who have not already worked it out for themselves asking about the ramifications of the different scenarios.

      In fairness there were a lot of questions about it so the articles were needed imo even if a bit premature.

    3. Mark
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 19 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      The issue is that in the Scout Notes over the next few days, we would be visiting this stuff anyway. So that would negate the need for the articles and make it difficult for folk to find the consolidated info.

      Better that we get these articles out, set up the framework, then revisit and update the thinking in the Notes.

      We have a Burning Question out next week also to tie things up.

      1. HNI
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Thank you Mark for the consolidated article coming soon. Think I will rattle my brain after sunday as too many ifs right now.

  15. Red Rock
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Alonso or Otamendi out first?

    1. Zilla
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Otamendi

    2. Sailboats
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Otamendi 100%

    3. OldBenKenobi
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      I’m leaning to Ota even with the doubt over Alonso. City has the league won practically and would imagine will step off the gas a little and probably rotate players for remaining cups games. Chelsea still fighting for top 4th place

  16. Davido989
    • 15 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    15 Brazilian players confirmed going to the WC, by their manager.

    "Alisson, Daniel Alves, Thiago Silva, Marquinhos, Miranda, Marcelo, Casemiro, Fernandinho (PL), Renato Augusto, Willian (PL), Paulinho, Coutinho, Neymar, Gabriel Jesus (PL) and Roberto Firmino (PL)."

    1. UshFPL
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      I'm surprised that Ederson isn't there

      1. OldBenKenobi
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Yet

      2. Davido989
        • 15 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Alisson has been Brazil's first choice.

        1. UshFPL
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          With 3 keepers in the squad, Ederson's place should be secure too.

    2. Sailboats
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Alisson ahead of Ederson hmm...

      1. Zilla
        • 8 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Do you even watch Roma?

    3. Miguel Sanchez
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      I fancy them to win it

  17. Karan_G14
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Better option?

    A) Otamendi & Lingard ➡️ Robertson & Walcott

    B) Alonso & Lingard ➡️ VVD & Walcott

    Will be benching Alonso or Ota whoever I keep.

    1. Sailboats
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      A

    2. Norman Conquest
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      B

    3. Naboo
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      B if you're gonna bench Alonso. Why you would I have no idea though. Check his scores against top 6 this season

  18. Mr. Jenkins
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    If FH'ing in 31 as i am, would you bring auba in now for aguero or after the game?

    1. Naboo
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Neither tbh

      1. Zladan
        • 8 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        This. So early making the change that you can wait to make.

    2. tikka mo'salah
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      No reason to do your transfer now. Wait and see after the games. Who knows who might be injured.

  19. as33
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Alonso>Monreal and Son>Mane? my team: Alonso, Jones, Daniels, Mee, Collins
    Salah, Ericsen, Son, B.Silva
    Kane, Firmino, Wilson

  20. Emiliano Sala
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Best premium defenders in order ?
    Already have jones and vvd. Will sell jones soon.
    Vert?
    Alder?
    Davies?
    Monreal?

    1. Naboo
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Vert first choice, Monreal 2nd (due to EL focus - playing on Thursdays and trying to win it as most likely route back to CL)

  21. OldBenKenobi
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Some extra excitement for you folks regarding who blanks!!!!
    https://twitter.com/bencrellin/status/964540579739766784

    1. OldBenKenobi
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Leicester vs Sheffield United being brought forward from 3pm tomorrow to 7.45pm tonight slipped under my radar.

      If there are no replays in tonight's games, the Blank status of the Gameweek 31 fixtures between Burnley & Chelsea and Leicester & Arsenal will be confirmed.

    2. OldBenKenobi
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Just realised this is stated in the article. Didn’t sink in the first time 🙂

  22. davies
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Shaqiri a must for the BGW?

    1. OldBenKenobi
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Not a bad ideal no

      1. OldBenKenobi
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Idea * blimmen autocorrect

    2. DJ1000
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Not sure I would say he is a must. Playing in a very poor team

  23. St. Joseph
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    My first transfer plan was
    Otamendi / Jones >> van Dijk
    But,
    With Adrian as my playing GK
    Should i reconsider him to Karius?

    Keeping Otamendi surely better than keeping west ham defence right?

    1. Naboo
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      If going for CS only then yes. You must weigh up whether the added attacking threat of VVD over Karius is worth it too I guess

    2. Norman Conquest
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      good chance huds could beat united then there will be no need to get rid of adrian or jones just do ota to vvd

  24. GE
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Bad timing to use hits when getting closer to end of season?
    Thinking about doing B. Silva and Alonso -> Mane and max 5.3 def (-4)

  25. Backup Dancer
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    For those that got unlucky with the TC chip on Kane, would this be a good strategy?

    WC34
    FH35
    BB37

    Allows us to take advantage of Arsenal's plum GW32-33 games and get the most up to date team for 34 doubles.

    1. Zladan
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      I’m in this boat too.

      As you saw below, I was thinking of:

      BGW31: FH
      GW32: WC
      GW33: Save FT
      DGW34: 15 DGWers (preferably fewer GW35 blankers)
      BGW35: 2FT
      GW36: prep for DGW37

      1. DJ1000
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Don’t think you need 15 dbgwers in gw34. 13 should be enough. The likes of Salah and Firminho could score more than dbgwers.

    2. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      FH31
      WC36
      BB37

      This way you can ignore 31, avoid buying dross and plan for DG34 with 6 transfers

      BGW35 has a minimum of 6 games and decent teams so you should get 11 players easily

  26. Zladan
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    This article looks at using the Free Hit when there are reduced fixtures but with better assets to choose from.

    I prefer to use the Free Hit to avoid as many transfers as possible.

    It will be harder to get a full XI in GW31 than GW35 as there are fewer fixtures. Therefore requiring more transfers in GW31.

    It will be easy to field a full XI in GW35 if there are a minimum of 12 teams playing.

    You would spend fewer points in run up to GW35 than GW31 in transfers too.

    GW31 is a no brainier for me for FH.

    1. Backup Dancer
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      But your team is likely to be full of GW34 doublers that blank in 35.

      These same players will then double in 37.

      It's definitely a brainer, either way.

      1. Zladan
        • 8 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        There will be DGW that do not blank in GW35.

        Of course it depends on the fixtures. But as things stand, there are only 4 teams playing in GW31.

        Maybe there is also a lower limit whereby there aren’t enough points to gain using a FH. Maybe a minim of 8 teams is required to justify it.

        1. Ramboros
          • 14 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          You can't have a DGW in GW37 without having a blank in GW35. The only possible exceptions to that rule are Leicester, Arsenal and City.

          1. Zladan
            • 8 Years
            8 years, 5 months ago

            Of course, I was saying there are teams that have DGW34 and not BGW35.

    2. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Sshhhh ... Surprised more people don’t see this

  27. Zenith UK
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    My brain legit hurts right now... 🙁

  28. StayoutheSpiceZone
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Evening guys

    My team is currently

    Karius Elliot

    Ogbonna Dunk Daniels Kenny Maguire

    Salah Sterling Son Mane Walcott

    Kane Wilson Vardy

    Have no WC left, but all the other remaining chips

    Could someone outline what they would do strategy wise moving forward?
    Thanks

  29. Tazah
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Can't wait for all this planning to be for nothing after these cup upsets

    1. Mysterion
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      It's impossible for 3 in depth articles to be for nothing as they're putting forward different strategies for all possible outcomes of the FA cup.

      If ffs didn't do these articles the comments would be filled with "we don't know what to do, the sky is falling" type of stuff.

      Damned if you do...

  30. Old Man
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    8 years, 5 months ago

    Anyone else getting very slow response times? I'm using Chrome on my laptop. It's happening even after rebooting. Doesn't seem quite so bad using Firefox

    1. The Bandit
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Ok for me with Chrome on laptop and Safari on iPad. While you’re here, what your opinion on Chilwell starting against Stoke? Thinking about playing BB but he worries me

      1. Old Man
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Chilwell playing tonight - not perhaps a good sign for him against Stoke. Let's hope he scores twice.

    2. FC Lackless [BALEGIUM]
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Seems okay ... also Chrome on the laptop / Safari on the phone

      1. The Bandit
        • 15 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Obviously not received these replies yet 😉

      2. Old Man
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Thanks for your reply - this reply sent via Chrome. It's still a bit tardy! I sent WR's via Firefox.

    3. Old Man
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 5 months ago

      Thanks WR - must be something happening on my machine.
      As for Chilwell, I must hesitate to say that he's nailed or will start against Stoke. The truth is that I'm not sure. We might be able to make a more educated guess after tonight. To be honest his points have been a little disappointing - especially his attacking returns. I will ask one of my better informed friends and get back to you. Do you have him already?

      1. The Bandit
        • 15 Years
        8 years, 5 months ago

        Thanks, yep already got. Delay is not your end in this case, been having my tea 🙂

        1. Old Man
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 15 Years
          8 years, 5 months ago

          Funnily enough we've just had ours - Aldi veggie parcels (which are surprisingly good)