Scout Notes

Hazard’s frustrated FPL owners consoled by an assist off the bench

On a day of substantial Fantasy Premier League scores elsewhere, Eden Hazard‘s owners had to make do with a solitary assist from the Belgian as Chelsea ran out 3-1 winners at Stamford Bridge.

In the end, the 44% of FPL managers sitting on the Blues’ midfielder were perhaps content to get something other than the dreaded “one-pointer” as Hazard’s back injury restricted him to a half-hour appearance off the bench.

Marcos Alonso recorded his seventh assist of the season, meanwhile, and is now 19 points ahead of the second-highest-scoring defender in FPL (Liverpool’s Andrew Robertson).

We round up all the goals, assists, manager quotes and Fantasy talking points from the London derby that took place on Sunday afternoon.

Chelsea 3-1 Crystal Palace

  • Goals: Alvaro Morata (£8.7m) x2, Pedro (£6.3m) | Andros Townsend (£5.7m)
  • Assists: Pedro, Eden Hazard (£11.3m), Marcos Alonso (£7.0m) | James McArthur (£4.7m)

After the enjoyable exhibition of high-tempo football served up at the Etihad on Sunday afternoon, the overlapping fixture at Stamford Bridge was something of a let-down.

The match was indeed veering towards “tedious” territory for the first hour.

Up until the 60-minute mark, there had been two shots on target – both of which found the back of the net.

Alvaro Morata (£8.7m) opened the scoring on 31 minutes when controlling Pedro (£6.3m)’s half-volleyed ball across the box and firing past Wayne Hennessey before Andros Townsend (£5.7m) latched onto a James McArthur (£4.7m) through-ball not long after the interval to restore parity.

The only other action of note before Eden Hazard‘s (£11.3m) introduction on 64 minutes centred around Willian (£7.4m), who had a goal disallowed in the first half for the most marginal of offside calls and was then denied an assist when David Luiz (£5.5m) headed his compatriot’s in-swinging free-kick straight at Hennessey.

After the scintillating display at Burnley last weekend, Willian’s threat largely came from dead-ball situations on Sunday, but he still managed to create more chances in his hour-long showing than any other player on show at Stamford Bridge.

Willian’s owners would have found the manner of Chelsea’s second goal particularly galling as it was his replacement, Hazard, whose curling free-kick eventually found its way to Morata on the edge of the six-yard box, with the Spanish striker confidently lashing home from a tight angle.

Not for the first time this season, Hazard came off the bench to inject some life into a stale Chelsea performance.

The Gameweek 2 victory over Arsenal and the Europa League win over MOL Vidi come to mind, with Hazard’s introduction as a substitute on both occasions having a galvanising effect with the scores level and that same impact was felt again against the Eagles on Sunday.

Hazard’s motivational contribution didn’t translate into a particularly noteworthy performance from a Fantasy perspective, with the Belgian not registering a single shot on goal or penalty box touch in his all-too-brief time on the field.

The talismanic midfielder could so easily have emerged from the game with a second assist, however, when Morata wasted the chance of a hat-trick by chipping Hazard’s through-ball straight at Hennessey following a swift break.

His manager, Maurizio Sarri, had this to say about him after full-time:

Today was very important to have him on the bench. I spoke yesterday with the doctor and he said Hazard was doing better but, for me, is not able to play for 90 minutes.

So I asked for the bench, and he said I could try. But no more than 30 minutes. We were lucky. Immediately, the first minute, I think, he was able to change our match. But you know Hazard is Hazard. He’s able to do this very often.

There will no doubt be a fair share of Hazard’s owners who are tempted to bail on the Belgian after five points in three Gameweeks and premium alternatives Mohamed Salah (£13.0m) and Sadio Mane (£9.8m) enjoying a home fixture against Fulham in Gameweek 12.

Hazard has, however, another week to recover from the back injury that has plagued him over the last fortnight and Chelsea next face an Everton side without a clean sheet away from home this season and who have shipped two goals in four of their five Premier League fixtures on the road.

Chelsea’s reliance on Hazard is palpable at times and there is little doubt that if he is fit, he will start next Sunday – something that perhaps can’t be said for Liverpool’s attacking midfielders when Fulham come to town.

Pedro did his best to alleviate the burden that Hazard shoulders in this Chelsea side by recording a goal and assist, producing a sprightly performance and registering more penalty box touches than anyone on show at Stamford Bridge.

It seems a long time ago that Pedro was the in-vogue mid-price midfield option and in reality, there will be few Fantasy managers willing to revisit the Spanish winger despite his 12-point return.

With Hazard nearing full fitness, the “job share” with Willian – who has started 11 matches in a row in all competitions – is reason enough to give Pedro a wide berth for the foreseeable.

It was only a week ago that we were discussing the double-digit return of another mid-price Chelsea midfielder: Ross Barkley (£5.9m).

The former Everton midfielder was the most-bought player of Gameweek 11 but sadly for the 450,000+ FPL managers who drafted him into their sides, there was to be no repeat of his heroics at Turf Moor.

Barkley picked an inopportune time to deliver a below-par performance, not registering a single penalty box touch – as happened last week – and failing to record one key pass.

The Chelsea midfielder’s only effort on goal was a wild shot from distance that sailed high above the bar, while he was dispossessed on more occasions than any of his team-mates.

It was no surprise, therefore, to see Mateo Kovacic (£5.9m) replace him on 64 minutes, and the worry for Barkley and his 9.4% of FPL owners was that the Croatia international produced a tidy display on his introduction.

Just as we didn’t go overboard with the hype last weekend, however, it would be misguided to write Barkley off as disposable after one poor performance.

Palace did an excellent job of shackling Barkley throughout and it remains to be seen whether Everton have anything in their locker to do likewise in west London next weekend – if, of course, the England midfielder keeps his place over Kovacic. Who Sarri picks in midfield against BATE Borisov on Thursday evening should give us a big clue as to who will start against the Toffees in Gameweek 12.

Marcos Alonso (£7.0m) seems unlikely to lose many owners in that intervening period after the Spanish left-back recorded his seventh assist of the season for the low cross that led to Pedro’s goal.

That no FPL defender recorded more than seven assists in the whole of 2017/18 illustrates the value for money that Alonso is offering even at this premium price: no outfield player is currently returning more FPL points (11.1) per million spent.

Alonso’s assist potential has seemingly replaced his goal threat, with the Spaniard having again failed to record a single attempt on goal.

The Spanish left-back, who has attempted fewer shots than David Luiz and Antonio Rudiger (£6.0m) in the last seven Gameweeks, discussed his changing role at Chelsea ahead of Gameweek 11.

Alonso said:

It was harder for me when I went to Italy and I started playing as a wing-back because that was new for me, but now it’s just going back to the position I played in before I moved to Italy.

That’s the position I’ve always played and I feel good there. Playing as a wing-back I used to be closer to the goal and I could help the team more in attack, now it’s different. I have to pick when I try to go up and focus on defending.

Maurizio and Antonio are both very good managers but it’s a completely different style. Now we try to have control of the game with possession, we try to find spaces to get closer to the goal and generate chances. I think we are all feeling very good playing this way and we have to make sure the results keep coming.

There is little wrong with Alonso’s creativity, though. Only three defenders, all of whom take set pieces for their respective clubs, have carved out more chances in 2018/19.

With Olivier Giroud (£7.8m) once again ruled out with muscle fatigue, Morata was used as the spearhead of the Chelsea attack again.

Morata’s performances have improved in the last month and Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang (£10.9m) is the only FPL forward to have scored more goals than the former Juventus and Real Madrid striker in the last four Gameweeks.

Morata’s performance was a mix of predatory strike play and profligacy, and the forward seemed visibly dejected by his glaring stoppage-time miss.

Sarri admitted that Morata has a psychological barrier to overcome:

He’s a little bit fragile from the mental point of view. But he’s very young. I think he can improve, improve very fast.

Alvaro improved the last month. Improved for the confidence, improved for the personality, improved also from the technical point of view. Now he’s able to play more with the team, I think. But I think, also, that Alvaro has a very great physical and technical potential, so I think he can improve more.

Palace had started this game in a 4-4-2, with Wilfried Zaha (£6.8m) and Andros Townsend (£5.7m) leading the line and Max Meyer (£5.6m) brought in to play on the left of midfield.

That the Eagles only had two shots on target in the whole game – one of which was Townsend’s goal – underlined the problem Roy Hodgson’s side have been having all season in converting their positive build-up play into chances.

Zaha’s display was a fine example of that – the Ivorian caused plenty of problems for Chelsea’s backline with his trickery and no player on show registered more penalty box touches.

Zaha didn’t, however, register a single shot on goal in the entire 90 minutes.

The former Manchester United winger was frequently crowded out by blue shirts as he weaved into dangerous positions and opposing defences have clearly cottoned on to the fact that by stopping Zaha, they are cutting off Palace’s main source of goals from open play.

Zaha was even name-checked in Sarri’s post-match presser:

Zaha is very fast. Sometimes, I have to say that, especially in the first 20 minutes in the first half and the first 15 minutes of the second half, we were not in good positions under the ball line in the offensive phase. We were in trouble because we gave them, and especially him, spaces to attack. So it’s not easy to run with Zaha in a long race.

Chelsea XI (4-3-3): Kepa; Azpilicueta, Rudiger, Luiz, Alonso; Kante, Jorginho (Fabregas 80′), Barkley (Kovacic 64′); Willian (Hazard 64′), Morata, Pedro.

Crystal Palace XI (4-4-2): Hennessey; Wan-Bissaka, Tomkins, Sakho, Van Aanholt; McArthur (Schlupp 80′), Kouyate, Milivojevic, Meyer (Ayew 71′); Townsend, Zaha.

Become a Member and access our data

Memberships for the 2018/19 campaign are now available for the price of just £15.

Join now to get the following:

  • Plot your transfer strategies using the fully interactive Season Ticker.
  • Get projections for every Premier League player provided by the Rate My Team statistical model.
  • Use Rate My Team throughout the season to guide your selections and transfers.
  • Get access to over 130+ exclusive members articles over the season.
  • Analyse our OPTA-powered statistic tables specifically tailored for Fantasy Football Managers.
  • Use our exclusive tool to build custom stats tables from over 100 OPTA player and team stats.
  • View heatmaps and expected goals data for every player.
  • Use our powerful comparison tool to analyse players head-to-head.

CLICK HERE TO BECOME A FANTASY FOOTBALL SCOUT MEMBER

1,433 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Claudio555
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Maddison>Mané a no brainer? I have exactly the right amount of money ITB. Also Richarlison>Mané is an option.

    1. Respect My Authoritah
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Might be worth a hokey-cokey i.e. Richarlison to Mane this week, Maddison to Richarlison/Siggy next week

      1. Ser Davos
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        Hadn't considered this.

        *Scratches chin*

    2. Goat
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Yeah. Keep an eye on prices changing and try wait until after CL

    3. Sweetboi
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Definitely. Burnley a great fixture but Liverpool against Fulham should be a battering.

    4. IRBOX ⚽
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Yep Maddison to Mane. If prices permit wait as long as possible

    5. Rage Against The Raheem
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Yes looks good (Transfer Maddy out, not Rich), doing the same move myself.

    6. Ser Davos
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      .1 off but with a apare FT so doing the same

  2. IRBOX ⚽
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    2FT / 0.7 ITB. May do Højbjerg to Diangana this week, carrying 2 trannys into IB. Then for a -4 will possibly do Bennett, Fraser, Aguero to Doherty, Sterling, Jimenez. Thoughts?

    Ryan
    Alonso Mendy Robbo
    Salah Hazard Richarlison Fraser
    Agüero Wilson Arnie

    Button Højbjerg Bennett AWB

    1. A.T
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Good plan but I’d probably save and do it for free.

      1. IRBOX ⚽
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        I am saving, however, 3 proposed transfers will always be for a hit. No necessity to do the Bennett > Doherty move though

    2. IAWC ( It's a Wonderfu…
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      whats ur rationale in prefering salah over aguero + 2 mil??Yeah hojberg to diangana looks a good move.Would rather do salah + fraser to sterling + siggy and doubleup for everton vs cardiff

  3. AFC49
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    What to do with this team?

    Patricio
    Laporte, Alonso, Doherty
    Hazard, Sterling, Richarlison, Murphy
    Aguero, Lacazette, Arnautovic

    Button, Schindler, Højbjerg, AWB

    1FT, 0 ITB

    1. ClassiX
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      No Pool attack might hurt you this week.

      1. AFC49
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        Yes, that is my worry 🙁

        1. ClassiX
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 5 Years
          5 years, 5 months ago

          Short of getting rid of either Sterling or Haz, Laca+Murphy>Mane+Cheap Forward about the only way (for a hit)

          1. AFC49
            • 10 Years
            5 years, 5 months ago

            Sterling > Salah, Laca > Wilson? (-4)

    2. Taking one for the team
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Ideally need 1 x pool attack and def in there, at least one of them

  4. Cojones of Destiny
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    thoughts on hazard? move for mane or sterling?

    1. joeydelucchi
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      are you mad? ....came on yesterday and changed the game.

      1. KUNingas
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        This..

    2. Sweetboi
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Keep. Top scorer in the game and he's missed a game and got small cameos in 3.

      1. Emp
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        Actually my captain yesterday is now top scorer:p #notsohumblebrag

        1. Sweetboi
          • 8 Years
          5 years, 5 months ago

          Nope, Hazard is. But I appreciate the brag.

    3. Taking one for the team
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Don’t think so, if Hazards fit he’s a keeper

  5. joeydelucchi
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Anyone else giving Salah his last chance against Fulham ...then swapping to Mane?

    1. Goat
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Yup. Need those funds

    2. Sweetboi
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Yeah, or Sterling. Obviously if Salah goes nuts it could change that.

    3. goriuanx
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      I'm keeping Salah, but if he blanks it gives food for thought.

      Liverpool certainly look weaker in attack, hoping Shaqiri starts the next few to help.

      There's just no creativity in this current midfield. Goes to show how much Liverpool are missing Cout / Ox. Not signing an attacking midfielder was a huge mistake.

      1. Sweetboi
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        Agreed, not that same attacking potential. Your game management seems to be better as well...more clean sheets, less goals.

      2. internal error
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        I saw this interesting article on twitter last night about how Klopp was willing to sell Coutinho because he didn't have the cardio to play in a 4-3-3.

        1. goriuanx
          • 13 Years
          5 years, 5 months ago

          I disagree personally. I think we sold Coutinho because he simply didn't want to be here and we got paid £142m. Klopp should have replaced him, he didn't 🙁

          1. internal error
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 11 Years
            5 years, 5 months ago

            Fekir talk starting again. Hope we go back in for him

            1. internal error
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 11 Years
              5 years, 5 months ago

              And get Naby and Fabinho playing together asap.

              1. Goat
                • 6 Years
                5 years, 5 months ago

                Honestly haven’t been impressed with Fabinho. Looks off the pace. Keita looks good

                1. internal error
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 11 Years
                  5 years, 5 months ago

                  He does but it's early days for him. I'm prepared to give him plenty of time

              2. goriuanx
                • 13 Years
                5 years, 5 months ago

                If we didn't sign Fekir because of alleged knee issues as opposed to financial issues, then I don't think it makes sense to go back in for him to be honest. I hope we've identified another target and get him in January.

                Fabinho and Keita have made very slow starts for different reasons - Klopp said he is easing the former in while the latter keeps missing games through injuries. It's so frustrating 🙁

                Post international break, I would like to see Fabinho, Keita/Gini, Shaqiri for a good 5-6 games but I can't see it happening.

                1. internal error
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 11 Years
                  5 years, 5 months ago

                  Yea, but if it means winning the league this season and we only get 3 years out of him then I'm fine with that 🙂

                  1. goriuanx
                    • 13 Years
                    5 years, 5 months ago

                    So am I haha, but I don't think the club want to take a chance on his knee if they can't negotiate the insurance package they want. There's plenty of other players who would fit our system. I would love a Bernardo Silva type player - floater who breaks the lines and controls the pace of attackers.

                    1. internal error
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 11 Years
                      5 years, 5 months ago

                      Have we been linked with anyone? I do like Shaqiri tbh. Like you said, once we get Naby up and running again, it should provide more balance

                      1. internal error
                        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                        • 11 Years
                        5 years, 5 months ago

                        Ox was so good for us. I read that he could be back before season ends.

        2. asquishypotato
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 5 months ago

          He did look good, but was a bit of a luxury sometimes, he was never a player that would harry a land press for days, but he was good at it.

          The OX was perfect, still think Fekir will sign at some point, Klopp loves one player and will go after them until he gets them.

      3. IAWC ( It's a Wonderfu…
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        yeah ur attack and completely agree with u

        1. IAWC ( It's a Wonderfu…
          • 6 Years
          5 years, 5 months ago

          *analysed

      4. joeydelucchi
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        yes exactly, I think the point is last season if Salah had been 13 mil it wouldve been worth it, but not for more obvious reasons but because I believe Klopp didnt care so much about defending as he does now....so Mane is enough , salah is the better player but not 3mil better.

        I dont agree with what youre saying about creativity as pool were thrashing teams without them last season, its about the pressing...Klopp has realised that the high and heavy pressing which helps them thrash teams comes at a price i.e. conceding the odd goal especially against the bigger teams. The game against arsenal showed us this, they didnt do any of the high and heavy pressing in first half, showed arsenal too much respect...liverpool last season would've had this wrapped up at half time especailly with Mustafi and no Koscielny at the moment they are no longer the liverpool of before.

    4. IAWC ( It's a Wonderfu…
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      think i am dumping him regardless.Need the funds

      1. IAWC ( It's a Wonderfu…
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        prefer sterling over mane tho

  6. Bullet Eder
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Can anybody tell me Mitro ownership top 10k?

    1. ClassiX
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Around 38% in top 1000

    2. Sweetboi
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      37%

    3. Roy Rovers
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Had him but switched to Arnie this week.

  7. Hazardness FC
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Hello lads I would appreciate your opinion for game week 12

    Fabianski/hamer
    Laporte/TAA/Alonso/Robertson/Bennett
    Salah/Hazard/Maddison/Fraser/Hojbjerg
    Arnautovic/Kun/Success

    TAA/Hojbjerg/Kun - out

    Ake or Duffy/Mane/Wilson or Murray - in

    For a -8 point hit and line up will be 3/5/2.. i think I can rack up some good points with both mane and salah for game week 12. What do you guys think ?!

    1. Warby84
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      No way

  8. NUFCAndrew
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    What to do with this? 2 FTs. 0.7 ITB

    Patricio Hamer

    Alonso Mendy Chilwell Doherty WB

    Salah Hazard Maddison Izquierdo Hojbjerg

    Aguero Arnie Wilson

    1. Taking one for the team
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Maybe use the extra cash to get a pool defender

  9. Tmel
    • 13 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Yes or no to transferring out Sterling or Hazard for Salah/Mane?

    1. Sweetboi
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      No.

    2. mike09
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Sterling > Salah.

  10. Tshelby
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Suggestions?
    2FT
    0.0 ITB

    Fabianski, Hamer
    Alonso, Trippier, Robbo, Bennett, AWB
    Salah, Hazard, Richarlison, Barkley, Billing
    Kun, Mitro, Arnie

    Cheers

  11. ADH
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Fraser + Luiz to Mane + Balbuena for a -4?

    Would leave me with:

    Alisson, Fabianski
    Alsonso, Mendy, Duffy, Balbuena, AWB
    Salah, Mane, Sigurdsson, Maddison, Camarasa
    Aguero, Arnautovic, Success

    1. Taking one for the team
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Looks good to me

  12. Emiliano Sala
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    One moment, I think about having 5 at the back with: RAM, laporte and trippier
    Then I feel there are great mid options and should have more of them and then I realise I can't afford them all
    I play 433 right now but after 3 gameweeks, trippier has long great run of fixtures. I really don't know which formation should I chose from now on

    1. Ser Davos
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      4-5-1?

      Wilson's fix dries up and even a goal doesn't amount to many points.

      Arnie and Murray are great options too, but otherwise I reckon it's all about those defence and mids.

      1. Emiliano Sala
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        Thinking about 442
        More flexible

  13. Shatner's Bassoon
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Would feel like such scaldy points if Mitro hauls tonight after I've already sold him.

    1. internal error
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      I need around 35 pts from him to get hundred. Think it's possible?

      1. internal error
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        *25 but I want 35 from him

  14. HD7
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Save a transfer?

    Fab
    Mendy Robbo Alonso Duffy
    Salah (C) Richa Maddy Hazard
    Aguero Arnie

    Subs: Button, Kenedy, Success, WanB

  15. Eden Wizard
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    KDB>Diangana no brainer? 😉

    1. internal error
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      What you planning to do with " haulobas" ?

      1. Eden Wizard
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        Selling after Saints, was always a 3 game move.

  16. L'Aeroplanino
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    do Alonso not take FK anymore? or Luiz hogging it now?

    1. Sweetboi
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Haven't got a direct one in a while I don't think...Willian more of a threat than Luiz. Luiz takes the ones from really far out.

      1. L'Aeroplanino
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        cheers

    2. internal error
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Have the won a free kick to the right of the penalty area? I think that's Alonso's area

    3. Warby84
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      He will get his share depending on which side of the box.. One is due!!

  17. Bird Raymond
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Is Murray still a good option to replace Mitrovic? I know Brighton's away form isn't great but their next 3 away games couldn't be better.

  18. Jarnathan
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Anyone looking at Kiko Fermina as a good bench option at 4.2?

    1. Ask Yourself
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Not with jaanmat about to return

      1. Jarnathan
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        Yep, I was wonder if it was injury related... thanks

    2. Bird Raymond
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      No, the manager changes things around at the drop of a hat.

  19. SOTHPAW
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Thoughts on any changes to make to this squad?

    Fabianski Hart
    Trippier Alonso Robertson Mendy Doherty
    Hazard Mane Richarlison Fraser Murphy
    Aguero Arnautovic Wilson

    0.7m ITB
    Fraser to ?

  20. IAWC ( It's a Wonderfu…
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    guys what's the prefernce bw
    A)ings
    B)jimenez
    and why?

    Slightly prefer ings but need opinions

    1. goriuanx
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Jimenez.

      Better player, better team, better service.

      1. BlackZoda
        • 11 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        Long term I think Jimenez, but right now I prefer Ings. Been delivering under expectation and got some good matches coming up.

        Also I'm starting to have a thing for reversed Fulham coverage, in either a goal scoring or at least creative player from the opposing team. Traded in Salah and Ings, and got Maddison and Hazard. Guess I'll have to get a united player for game week 16...

    2. Ask Yourself
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      I went through this and ended up on ings. Mainly because that 0.2m is crucial for me getting martial or a nobody next week. But ings is the main man for Southampton and nailed on pens always gets chances every game Southampton now look like they want to attack with the 442 so he’a Good enough for the price. Jimmy is a poor finisher

    3. Make Arrows Green Again
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      I had both and sold Ings because of the reasons Berbinho sets out below.

      1. Make Arrows Green Again
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        Above... XD

  21. Make Arrows Green Again
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    I have been thinking about strong versus weak benches since reading this question for the scoutcasts.

    https://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/2018/11/05/hazards-frustrated-fpl-owners-consoled-by-an-assist-off-the-bench/?hc_page=3&hc_sort_by=comment_date#hc_comment_19224294

    **This is my argument for keeping benches weak**...:

    The most likely outcome for most players in any game is a blank. Be that failing to score or assist or conceding a goal (defenders).

    If a player were to return six points in every game they would be right near the top of the points charts come the end of the season.

    In order to afford those players who average 5-6+ PPG you need to pay a lot more than baseline, baseline being 4m for defenders, 4.5m for midfielders and attackers. These are not bench players, they are regular XI players.

    When we talk about having strong benches therefore, we're talking about players who are maybe 1m more than baseline in each position. The argument for a stronger bench is that if a starting XI player fails to appear at all, then you get a better class of player off the bench.

    Aside from the fact that the stronger bench weakens the starting XI, I think the main argument against tying too much money up with your substitutes' bench is that you are paying more for slightly higher expected returns. You need a perfect storm of variables to come into play for this to pay off.

    Let's say that Success has about a 10% chance of attacking returns in an given game, whilst Ings has 20% at 1m more. What you need to have happen in order to realise that extra investment is:

    - You starting player not to appear at all, even off the bench. We saw yesterday with Hazard that rested/recovering players can be brought on for half an hour if the team needs them.

    - Ings has to outscore Success. He might be twice as likely, but the odds of him returning are still less than the odds of blanking. Ings will average more points but the mode average, the most likely single outcome, is 2 points. What are the chances that they get the enhanced score on the occasions they are called upon to do so?

    - Moreover, you need to get the bench order right in the first place. It might be that ABW or Bennett was the 'correct' choice and even if Ings were to score, you might have scored higher with a different first-choice sub. This might mean that next time you might be tempted to move Ings to second sub, or risk leaving another haul on the bench anyway.

    The important thing here is that the 2 points baseline is critical. I think that all bench players should be first team regulars because in a given game a dirt-cheap player is likely to match much more expensive options. Maddison has, for example, blanked in a few consecutive games, and his points have been more than covered by numerous baseline options. Success 'covered' Mané, Salah, Auba, etc etc. This week. He won't consistently, of course, but on a given week he is more than likely to.

    TLDR: Keep your benches weak but ensure that your players are all starters.

    1. goriuanx
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      'Keep your benches weak but ensure that your players are all starters'

      I rather have a player like Sterling and accept he may miss the odd game. He'll score lots when he plays, and can be replace with a decent sub if he doesn't feature.

      Alternatively I could have someone like Sanchez who will play if fit, and does naff all.

      1. Make Arrows Green Again
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        Good point but if your bench is too strong you might not be able to afford Sterling in the first place. Or, if you can, can you also afford Salah, Aguero, Aubameyang etc etc?

        If budget were not an issue then I agree 100%, but my argument is that we turn to our benches fairly rarely and the most likely score off the bench is 2 points. Spending 1m per player isn't going to change that very much, very often.

        1. goriuanx
          • 13 Years
          5 years, 5 months ago

          Yep unfortunately you have to make sacrifices. One of mine is no Aguero but you can't have them all but it's part of the fun 🙂

          1. Make Arrows Green Again
            • 7 Years
            5 years, 5 months ago

            I agree. I have had Aguero once this season and he either blanked or scored one, I think. There are very few essential players and Kun isn't one of them.

    2. Bird Raymond
      • 12 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      This season I think there is value in defence so I have gone with a useless 4.5 mid and 2 decent defenders on my bench, e.g. this week it was Balbeuna and Doherty, next week it will be Doherty and Digne. I've realised too late that this is actually pointless because my cheaper defenders tend to be on some form of rotation so usually have bad games the weeks they are benched, e.g. Doherty has Ars and Digne has Che next week. So I would have been better with a weaker bench and putting as much as possible on the pitch.

    3. Make Arrows Green Again
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      I'm taking the liberty of amending my own TLDR.

      The critical point of the whole piece is, I think, that the most likely single outcome of a substitution is 2 points. You need to spend a lot of money to get the sort of player who will reliably do better than this, and those players should not be on the bench anyway.

    4. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      I don’t think you need to spend 1.0 per player per bench, but spending maybe a bit more to get a nailed starter is important.

      Currently AWB & Balbena give a cheap certainty of starts and then it’s just how you set up the 3rd striker and 5th defender.
      1 - Ings & a 4.5 or 5.0 mid, or a
      2 - a 4.5 striker and a 4.5/5.0 mid.

      If you go for example 2, then you risk having just 2 starters on your bench and a rubbish 4.5 mid at best

      We have seen players on here only having 10 starters in their squad a few weeks ago, but the issue runs deeper with how free transfers and hits are used to bail out your starting 11 because the bench is so weak that you do not want to rely on it.

      This use of the free transfer & hits is hardly ever taken into account in the wider debate and the cost ‘and’ opportunity cost of it .... compared to the ‘wasted money on the bench’

      😉

  22. jon.terry.tfh
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Aguero and Fraser to Ings and Mane for - 4?

    Then swap Ings to Jimenez on Gw 13 and then swap Salah to Sterling on gw 14.

    1. Ask Yourself
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      If you take a -4 be certain with it it shouldn’t mean wasting more transfers straight after

    2. Klein
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Salah vs burnley gw15??

  23. It’s gonna Ben Mee
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    BILLLLLLIIIIIIING

    Practicing for tonight

    1. internal error
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      assist to Mitroooooooo

  24. Klein
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    People doing salah to sterling after fulham, whats your plan for liv vs bur gw15?

    1. jon.terry.tfh
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Captain a city player? Away to Watford ain't the worst fixture. Wilson at home to Huddersfield ain't bad either. Or just captain mane

  25. camarozz
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Mendy ➡️ VvD??

    He might fulfill his potential v Fulham.

    1. ClassiX
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Not the worst punt if you have nothing more urgent

    2. goriuanx
      • 13 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Unless injured, I wouldn't get rid of the president of sharks. What a FPL player.

    3. Ser Davos
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Seriously considering this to max out on Pool and raise the .1 needed for Maddison to Mane.

  26. mad_beer ✅
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Last week was a shocker for me. This week was great. Expecting another shocker next. It feels very up and down this season.

    1. Christina.
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Get a private and public team.

      Easy.

  27. Jebiga
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Please help ! All suggestions more than welcome. Willing to take a -4hit...

    Ederson
    TAA, Alonso, Balbuena
    Salah, Hazard, Maddison, Fraser
    Aguero, Arnautovic, Mitrovic

    Sub: 4, Wan - Bissaka, Bennett, Ward
    1FT
    1.2 in the bank

    1. mike09
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Fraser > Richa

      1. Jebiga
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        You think he will score against Chelsea away ?
        Fraser have more chances for scoring...
        But thanks for suggs

    2. Roy Rovers
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      A hit for what....nothing needed here..

  28. topdrog3108
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Balbuena or Duffy for Next 6?

    1. Roy Rovers
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      B

    2. Kroneek
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      West Ham is useless at defending (Balbuena owner)

  29. Indio
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Morning all.
    Is Barkley and Mitro > Rich and Jimmy a sensible course of action for team below? Thanks.

    Hart/Button
    RAM Doherty WB
    Salah, Haz, Barkley, Fraser, Holjbjerg
    Kun, Arnie, Mitro

    1. Roy Rovers
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      You didn’t give Barks much of a go!!

      1. Indio
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        5 years, 5 months ago

        Ha I know right - plan was Barks to cover CHE mid and then Haz to Mane for a Pool double up, but sometimes you have to admit when you were wrong !

        1. Roy Rovers
          • 9 Years
          5 years, 5 months ago

          Yep I’ve had to do it a few times this season.....sure they won’t be the last!!

  30. United84
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 5 months ago

    Ederson
    Alonso Robertson Duffy
    Mane Hazard Richarlison Maddison Fraser
    Arnie Aguero

    Hamer Mitrovic Digne Bennett

    Need to do anything this week or save ft??
    Was thinking save and then do Mitro & Maddison to Jimenez and Martial

    1. Roy Rovers
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 5 months ago

      Save FT