595 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. FCSB
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Dubravka
    TAA Porro Saliba
    Saka Jota Palmer Foden
    Haaland Solanke Watkins

    Areola Gordon Estupinan Lamptey

    1FT, 0.5itb

    Solanke >> Darwin (now to avoid being priced out)

    Yes or No ??

    Thanks

    1. Snooze ya lose
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Yes

    2. n14mul
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Yes

    3. agueroooooney
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      What's your plan to get him back for the double? How many players have you got for the blank?

      1. FCSB
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 26 days ago

        If I make the transfer I’ll have 8 for the blank so could probably get to 10?!

        1. agueroooooney
          • 11 Years
          2 years, 26 days ago

          So probably a hit to get him back?

          1. FCSB
            • 10 Years
            2 years, 26 days ago

            Wouldn’t be coming back until GW27

    4. Bluetiger1
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 25 days ago

      Yes

  2. Hanz0
    • 3 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Would you Bench Boost this in GW25?

    Kaminski*
    Doughty* VVD* Trippier
    KDB* Foden* Jota* Barkley*
    Haaland* Darwin* Toney*

    Bench: Flekken (Liv H, Mci A), Richarlison (Wol H), Moreno (Ful A), Van Hecke (Shu A)

    Maybe I would start Richarlison ahead of Barkley? So maybe you could argue I would be BB 2 DGW players?

    Need to ideally decide before the deadline, as if I am not going to Bench Boost I would rather get Neto for GW28 ahead of Flekken.

    1. Hippie Viking
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Would do it, especially if you have used your second wildcard. I have and will try to use BB in GW25 to be done with it.

    2. Bluetiger1
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 25 days ago

      yes gets that out of the way & a chance to gain a lot 11 DGW

  3. BUZZBOMB ♡
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    There are no two ways about it are there? FH29 is a must here...?

    Flekken^ Dubravka
    Gabriel Trippier Colwill* Guehi* Estupinian
    Saka Foden KDB Gordon* Palmer
    Watkins^ Solanke Archer

    * flagged
    ^ BGW29 fixture

    Got 2FTs this week and will use one for Solanke>Haaland

    Cant spend next 6 GWs and 7 tfs preparing for a BGW with those fixtures and teams and should focus on DGWs, form, fixtures and flags, right?

    Cant spend the

    1. Biggsy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Remember, about half of those GWs and FTs will be spent having as much information as you have now. Just FH it and focus on the doubles before it

    2. Geriatric Unathletic
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Correct

    3. Snooze ya lose
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Yes sir

    4. BUZZBOMB ♡
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Thank you folks. Appreciated as always.

    5. LC1
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Yes mate. I'm in a similar position and have toyed with planning for not using FH29 and I'm just ruining my team completely to field 6 for a -8 lol. Not worth it!

      Attack the doubles, FHGW29 and smash the late doubles / blanks with your WC!

  4. GoonerByron
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Is Konate an option for 25?Especially as he’ll get a good rest in 24 with his suspension.

    Have only 4.9 for a DGW defender in 25 so it’s..

    A - Konate
    B - Doughty

    1. Snooze ya lose
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      B all day imo

    2. Stranger Mings
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      A

  5. Snooze ya lose
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Haaland not worth a hit is he? Playing solanke instead

    1. DA Minnion (Former great)
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      I thought that last week.

  6. CheesyZoot
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    I need some help!

    I’m in a LMS at work and down to the last 9 people….

    So far I’ve used most of the big teams: and can’t use them again.

    My options realistically are Chelsea, Newcastle, and Luton…

    I’m a Chelsea fan and after the win yesterday I’m tempted to punt on them..

    Anyone got any thoughts on those 3 and who I should gamble on? I’m panicking here haha

    1. House Frey Wedding Planner
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Luton won't have a better fixture than Sheffield United at home and seems a good time to go with Luton.

      That said I went out of my LMS picking Chelsea last week against Wolves as on paper that seemed like their best fixture for quite a while yet.

  7. Geriatric Unathletic
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 15 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Worth a hit just for next week. Would want to be keeping Solanke.

    1. Gunners in Haaland
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Solanke/Martinelli/TAA -> Haaland/Garnacho/Gomez (-4) was my move...

  8. The Pep Revolution
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Is anyone else considering Adebayo instead of Nunez for DGW25?

    1. DARE TO BISCAN
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Yes. Although the Darwin FOMO is strong. Would be a good enabler to move towards a 3-5-2. Two doubles also nice.

    2. Biggsy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Yes! But it's an enforced consideration owing to a budgetary restriction

  9. DARE TO BISCAN
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Thoughts on this would be appreciated please:

    Dubravka
    Porro, Trippier, Udogie
    Saka, KDB, Palmer, Foden
    Solanke, Haaland, Watkins

    (Areola, Gordon, Estupinan, Andersen)

    a) Porro, Saka, Solanke > Doughty, Jota, Darwin (-8)
    b) Saka, Sol > Jota, Darwin (-4)
    c) Solanke > Darwin

    Seriously considering A. Makes use of good GW24 fixtures, Doughty has DGW25 & 28, Porro blanks GW26 anyway, extra £1m (for replacing Porro) for later Salah funding.

    Could then roll GW25, giving 2FT for GW26, or later.

    Is a -8 too much in GW24?

    1. Biggsy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Yes it's too much. It's a nice team. Just C

      1. DARE TO BISCAN
        • 7 Years
        2 years, 26 days ago

        Cheers. If C this week. What would you do in GW25?

  10. Gudjohnsen
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Bench one of:

    A. Palmer
    B. Cunha
    C. Richarlison

    1. n14mul
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      B

    2. DARE TO BISCAN
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Difficult. Crystal palace being rubbish makes it hard to drop Palmer. A or B. Probably A

    3. Gunners in Haaland
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Palmer

      1. Eastman
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 26 days ago

        Palmer but tough

  11. Heiro
    • 16 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Hi all,

    Need.to make a boring defender transfer this week.

    Who are the standouts for the next few? Walker, Konate? Konate?

    1. Heiro
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Van Dyke I mean

    2. n14mul
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Konate suspended vs burnley

    3. Bluetiger1
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 25 days ago

      Walker

      Leave the Konate twins out with suspension this week

  12. n14mul
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Start which 2

    A. Gusto
    B. Gabrielle

    1. Palmer
    2. Saka

    1. Biggsy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      B - because dreams can come true

      1

      1. DARE TO BISCAN
        • 7 Years
        2 years, 26 days ago

        Poor passing vision though

  13. You've got red on you.
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Trying to navigate the blanks and bring in a cheap enabler to last up to and including GW29.

    I've included their fixture runs and number of games they will have. Do I focus on number of games, nailedness or match difficulty?

    So far narrowed it down to these 4 players. Most are suggesting a or b but I feel the Luton defender has the better fixtures and 2 extra ones.

    a) Branthwaite (Everton) ----> Man City - Palace - Brighton - West Ham - Man Utd - Blank (5 games)

    b) Van Hecke (Brighton) ----> Spurs - Shef Utd - Everton - Fulham - Forest - Blank (5 games)

    c) Bell (Luton) ----> Shef Utd - ManUtd/Liverpool - Blank - Villa - Palace/Bournemouth - Forest (7 games)

    d) Bradley (Liverpool) ----> Burnley - Brentford/Luton - Blank - Forest - Man City - Blank (5 games)

    1. Biggsy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      I must say this is the most detailed analysis for someone who is probably going to sit as third sub most weeks.

      I'd focus on the fixtures where you are realistically going to play them - should find a winner starts to emerge (e.g., if only 26 that rules Bell and Bradley out)

    2. Concrete
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Looking at new Burnley def Assignon as an off the scale diff

      Branthwaite otherwise

  14. Old Man
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Allebloodylujah! I've just read that they are going to trial blue cards for sin-binned players. How many years have the idiot brains that run football to come up with something sensible? The punishement for the various play violatioons/fouls/violence should be punished in the game when it happens.
    At last!

    1. Herger
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      They can’t even execute the rules they already have in place correctly. I’d rather they focused on that 1st.

      1. Colonel Shoe 肝池
        • 14 Years
        2 years, 26 days ago

        This!
        They have a ridiculously complicated and expensive system that does not reduce glaring errors or engage football in any way..... Why introduce yet another bone of contention
        I wouldn't trust them to sit the right way on a toilet

      2. Feanor
        • 16 Years
        2 years, 26 days ago

        I had a simpler idea where every player who gets a yellow card has to run a lap of the field starting when play resumes, before being allowed back on. That takes the judgment call out of it for the refs.

        1. have you seen cyan
          • 6 Years
          2 years, 26 days ago

          lol love that idea.

          1. have you seen cyan
            • 6 Years
            2 years, 26 days ago

            kick in the nuts for a red also.

    2. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Unless it’s a separate officiating team handing out blue cards, how is it going to be different than the bookings we have now?

      1. Biggsy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        2 years, 26 days ago

        Of course it's different. They're blue. Normal cards are yellow. Different colours

    3. g40steve
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Custard,

      The Premier League has already ruled out being part of the initial roll-out of any trial, while football's world governing body Fifa said "reports of the so-called 'blue card' at elite levels of football are incorrect and premature".

      1. Old Man
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        2 years, 26 days ago

        Of course we all know that they make lots of sensible decisions don't we?

  15. BobbyDoesNotLook
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    I still have Salah 😀

    1. Bluetiger1
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 25 days ago

      how are you doing overall ?

      If been Green Arrow good decision
      if not might as well keep him now as guessing will play 30mins before the
      League Cup Final - I don't feel he will play a full 180 mins during the DGW

  16. Better Call Raul
    • 6 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Should I be concerned by the prospect of not owning KDB for this City run of fixtures?

    Would take me 2 transfers to get him as already own Haaland, Foden, Alvarez

    1. have you seen cyan
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Not really. I mean KDB is blocking a route to Salah for me. So just go Salah instead.

      1. Better Call Raul
        • 6 Years
        2 years, 26 days ago

        I must have missed some news, is he back already?

        1. have you seen cyan
          • 6 Years
          2 years, 26 days ago

          just saying in general. You should expect him back soon. That's what i would probably do as non-KDB owner.

          1. Better Call Raul
            • 6 Years
            2 years, 26 days ago

            Ah gotcha, cheers

            1. have you seen cyan
              • 6 Years
              2 years, 26 days ago

              KDB could be a place holder but I would prioritise Salah, assuming you have Haaland.

  17. nico05
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Gordon - (current mid KDB-Bruno-Saka-Bowen)
    A. garnacho
    B. foden (is he due a rest?)
    C. Anyone else?

    1. DARE TO BISCAN
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Would be such a Peptastic move to banish Foden for weeks, after scoring a hatrick

  18. Viper
    • 16 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    A. Salah & Solanke -> KDB & Darwin. No hit. Start Estupinian

    B. Salah & Lascellas -> KDB & VVD. No hit. Bench Estupinian.

    C. Estupinian, Salah & Palmer -> Doughty, Jota & KDB (-4). (Estupinian - > Doughty need for funds)

    Any help on this please?

    1. All de Gea
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      I think I'd take the risk on Etsu starting and go A as they are the best moves

      1. All de Gea
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 26 days ago

        Sorry Estu

  19. Feed tha Sheep
    • 13 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    I know it’s team specific but why is 27 instead of this week better to WC? If you do it this week you can plan for DGW25 & 28 and also blank 26 as opposed to taking hits to get through 24-27?

    1. Minion
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      I’m team WC24 but the logic being that waiting until 27 means you have the fixtures for 29 confirmed so more info.

      1. Feed tha Sheep
        • 13 Years
        2 years, 26 days ago

        But we are pretty sure which teams are going to play and which arnt other than maybe 1/2 shocks. I just wondered because I think being able to get an optimum team for 24-27 (ans knowing 80% teams for 29) is more important than taking hits in 24-27 and finding out 1/2 extra teams play in 29

        1. Minion
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          2 years, 26 days ago

          I agree completely. I think there’s enough time to react to any curveballs and they’re only likely to be positive ones with regards to 29 anyway.

          1. Feed tha Sheep
            • 13 Years
            2 years, 26 days ago

            I just think if you don’t WC 24/25 you’re better just waiting until 30. IMO 27 is one of the worst weeks to WC (but what do I know)

    2. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Confirmed fixtures for BGW29 from FAC R5 results before GW27 deadline

  20. The-Red-1
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Anyone else make a transfer then decide you've made a mistake and use another transfer to rectify that mistake?

    Nope, just me then lol

    1. Feanor
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Well I brought in Bowen at the end of 2023, and then when he got hurt I wildcarded in the same game week so I could take him out for Richarlison.

      12 Jan 12:48 J.Alvarez Nkunku GW21
      12 Jan 12:48 Gross Hee Chan GW21
      12 Jan 12:48 Richarlison Bowen GW21
      12 Jan 12:48 Doughty Mengi GW21
      12 Jan 12:48 Pedro Porro Virgil GW21
      12 Jan 12:48 Estupiñan Taylor GW21
      12 Jan 12:48 Dubravka Leno GW21
      30 Dec 19:58 Bowen Son GW21
      30 Dec 19:53 Foden Salah GW21

    2. DARE TO BISCAN
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Think I did this during Lockdown shenanigans. Game was cancelled after I brought someone in. I think. All a bit hazy, now

  21. agueroooooney
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Would you do Trippier to Trent this week for -4 if the plan would then be Trent out for the blank for -4 again?

    Which scores more:
    1)
    TAA: BUR - bre - LUT
    then
    Moreno: NFO - lut - TOT - whu
    With a -8

    Or

    2)
    Trippier: nfo - BOU - ars - WOL - che

    Option 1 has 2 extra fixtures but a -8 hit. Thoughts?

    1. MikeS
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      No

    2. Feed tha Sheep
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      No

    3. agueroooooney
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Thanks

  22. Lingard’s Shin Guards
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Yay or nay for these moves? Konsa, Solanke, Palmer -> D. Carlos, Garnacho, Haaland (-4).

    need to shift a defender since estupinan is a mins risk and I don’t have much of a bench with Konsa out and archer/al-dakhil limited mins, Palmer blanks 26 and possibly 29, and currently haalandless. Team looks like this:

    Areola
    Estupinan* Trent Porro
    KDB Saka Richarlison Foden Palmer
    Watkins Solanke

    Sanchez Konsa* Archer* Al-Dalhil*

    6.3 m itb 2ft

  23. MikeS
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Porro to vvd for free?

    1. :
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Porro's a bit overrated imo so yeah, why not?

  24. Sickboy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    I don’t supposed anyone knows if Reguilon is nailed for Brentford? Thanks

    1. Feed tha Sheep
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      In my opinion he should be (but that only my opinion and not anything factual unfortunately)

    2. SouthCoastSaint
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      He was excellent vs Man City I thought - bodes well

    3. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Not nailed

      1. Sickboy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        2 years, 26 days ago

        Thanks guys, helps me get to other players and Brentford won’t blank in 26 & 29. He did look good against City, I agree.

        1. Sickboy
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          2 years, 23 days ago

          Went okay.

  25. Totalfootball
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Anyone interested in Luis Diaz ?

    1. MikeS
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      No

    2. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Yes

    3. :
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Not for me personally but there's always a fly in the ointment in every DGW and who's to say that he isn't that fly?

    4. All de Gea
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      No - I just think he's more likely than the others to lose his spot if Gakpo gets a game or if/when Salah returns.

  26. Feed tha Sheep
    • 13 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    On WC you would take VVD over Trent obviously taking into consideration money and mins?

    1. have you seen cyan
      • 6 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      for sure

    2. :
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      No chance. We've reached that time of the season where you either go for gold or drift off into obscurity.

  27. The Red Devil
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Dubravka
    Porro/Saliba/Estupinan
    Jota/Richarlison/Saka/Foden/Palmer
    Watkins/Solanke

    Areola/Branthwaite/Taylor/Archer

    Thinking solanke to Haaland & roll other transfer

    selling solanke coz i'm not sure who to bench

    Thoughts?

    14.2 ITB 2 FT

  28. SouthCoastSaint
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    So I hate my team.

    Areola. Dubravka
    Trent. Estupinan. Porro. Udogie. Gabriel
    Palmer. Saka. KDB. Gordon. Gross
    Solanke Watkins Alvarez

    Only one FT. Rubbish rank,

    Feels like wildcard now gives me better chance of getting team sorted for the next 7 weeks?

    Later doubles might not be that big

  29. tryf88
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Gordon + Bowen to Jota and Garnacho?
    Or Gordon + Solanke to Jota + Adebayo

  30. RashFraud
    • 9 Years
    2 years, 26 days ago

    Bilva + Gordon > Foden + Garnacho (-4) yay or nay?

    1. RashFraud
      • 9 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      Have Haaland fwiw

    2. Big Mike
      • 3 Years
      2 years, 26 days ago

      No, just do Goirdon to Foden if you can afford it.