356 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. The Hunt
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 17 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Haaland essential. All we need is another Palmer or two to balance the books

    1. FPL Brains
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 14 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      Should have made him 17m

  2. Baps Hunter
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    @Camzy has made a good list of correct prices in his opinion and shared it here earlier. Now would be good time to start to compare published prices with that list. So if Camzy reads this or anyone can find his link, please do share it again!

  3. Baps Hunter
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Saliba, White and Gabriel all going to be 6 million? Or 1/2 6.5?

    1. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      Would have thought White would be 6.5

  4. Grounderz
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Havertz is priced at 8.0m but classified as a forward now.

  5. Dat Guy Welbz
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Haaland’s price had given me hope that FPL was back but the prices since have confirmed that is was just false hope. Havertz and CHO should both be a million more.

    1. Baps Hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      Unfortunately this was always the most likely scenario 🙁

    2. I Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      Don't agree. 8m is fine for Havertz as a forward. Loses the extra points for goals and cleansheets.

      1. Gommy
        • 16 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        Agreed. £8m is about right for a forward who finished 14th in Goals scored last season. I don't see the issue.

        1. Andy_Social
          • 13 Years
          2 years, 7 days ago

          14th because it took an age for Arteta to find his best position. Should hit the ground running this time.

          1. Debauchy
            • 13 Years
            2 years, 7 days ago

            Took an age to build up his confidence actually , early season this was sadly lacking.

          2. Gommy
            • 16 Years
            2 years, 7 days ago

            True, Arteta did take an age, but the argument is that his best position is a 'false' No.9, ie; not a natural Goalscorer.

            There's no guarantee he surpasses his total last year. Arsenal may have to create a high rate of chances for him to do that.

            1. Deulofail
              • 10 Years
              2 years, 7 days ago

              Who argues that he's a false 9? I think running in behind is part of his space-invading duties, as well as being a target man in and out of the box.

              1. Gommy
                • 16 Years
                2 years, 7 days ago

                It's figurately speaking and quite a few, I'm certain.

                He's played in every midfield position, either deep or advanced, as well as across the entire front line, within multiple formations since his days at Leverkusen. He's not been a master in any.

        2. x.jim.x
          • 11 Years
          2 years, 7 days ago

          8 goals + 7 assists in 13 games up front last season, 8m is a joke

          1. I Member
            • 10 Years
            2 years, 7 days ago

            This time last season you were banging on about what a terrible player he is.

            1. x.jim.x
              • 11 Years
              2 years, 7 days ago

              If I remember correctly, I was saying it was a terrible idea to play him as part of a midfield 3... seems like Arteta agreed with me in the end. He still underperformed his xG and massively overperformed his xA, so let's not get carried away.

              1. Deulofail
                • 10 Years
                2 years, 7 days ago

                Arsenal with Havertz in the midfield role didn't exactly get torn apart as you predicted:

                Conceded: 28
                Scored: 72

                But if I remember correctly, your main argument was that he is woeful at football.

                1. Debauchy
                  • 13 Years
                  2 years, 7 days ago

                  TBF he was woeful at Chelsea and took some time to
                  show improvement at Arsenal too.

                  1. Deulofail
                    • 10 Years
                    2 years, 7 days ago

                    Everybody could already see he wasn't pulling up trees at Chelsea, so it's not something to bang on about

                2. x.jim.x
                  • 11 Years
                  2 years, 7 days ago

                  You conceded 21 goals in the 24 games he started in midfield, and just 8 in 14 when he didn't. You dropped points in 10 games and 8 of them had Havertz starting in midfield. 1 he didn't play and the other was Man City.

                  "Torn apart" was a bit hyperbolic obviously, but you were clearly a worse team with him there than not.

        3. Camzy
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          2 years, 7 days ago

          You're not looking at the right stat.

          What is important is his goals/game and how he did after he became the nailed on no.9. His record is really good in that regard. He's straight in my team.

          1. Andy_Social
            • 13 Years
            2 years, 7 days ago

            Exactly. He and Pickers are inked in for me.

            1. Zimo
              • 7 Years
              2 years, 7 days ago

              Pickers? Pickford?

              1. Andy_Social
                • 13 Years
                2 years, 7 days ago

                Yeah, it what his ENG teammates call him.

                1. Zimo
                  • 7 Years
                  2 years, 7 days ago

                  Oh lol didn't know. Nice

          2. Gommy
            • 16 Years
            2 years, 7 days ago

            Oh I could've gone on.

            He might yet still find a spot in mine. The point made was regarding his price.

  6. Warby84
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Breaking News; Antoine Semenyo is 5.5 Mdf haha.. 1m more than last year, never scored a point when I owned him…

  7. Grounderz
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Salah is priced at 12.5m.

  8. Manani
    • 14 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Havertz feel essential? 8m if he got his form of last season felt like a no brainier to me?

    1. Uncle Baby Billy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      Aye, definitely essential. If you don't get him you'll finish last in the world. Don't say you weren't warned.

    2. bitm2007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      Being reclassified as a forward is off-putting for me. 29 of his 180 points last season came from CS points and the extra point per goal that mids get over forward.

    3. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      He's 1.5m underpriced imo. He's straight in the team.

      1. Pasqualinho
        • 17 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        Ars shopping around for a striker still, though.

        1. Camzy
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          2 years, 7 days ago

          They won't find one better than him imo. If they sign one it'll be as backup I reckon.

          1. Gommy
            • 16 Years
            2 years, 7 days ago

            Oh my, that is an interesting claim to say the least.

  9. F4L
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    wow just catching up. FPL towers doing it right this year. Who would've thought it. Lets gooooooo

  10. The Mentaculus
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Pickford & Leno both 5m

    1. Andy_Social
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      Delicious. Pickford and a 4m backup will do me.

  11. Uncle Baby Billy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Haaland with 30% ownership at the first deadline is going to be hilarious when he hits a hat trick in the first 20 minutes of City's opening game. The scramble to activate wildcards will blow up the servers for the rest of the season.

    1. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      Chelsea, Ipswich and West Ham in his first three games - could be on double-figures by the time the international break comes around.

  12. PartyTime
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Haaland at £15m happened a season late. Fpl already being a pain in the arse just wait for BPS & VAR to add to it.

  13. Andy_Social
    • 13 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    3 6.5m mIDS: Nkunku, Neto, March

    1. F4L
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      no surely not. it was going so well 😥

  14. Red Red Robins
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Nkunku 6.5 seems tempting as hell

    1. Andy_Social
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      He does, but it will be difficult to pick him over Palmer and even Jackson.

      1. Red Red Robins
        • 5 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        Triple up depending on prices, good early fixtures - which means 1 thing

        Burnt and rage quit after gw3

    2. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      At 6.5m that's really promising. I'm keen if he can prove his fitness. Wait and see option for me.

    3. Gommy
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      One to closely monitor over pre-season. If he looks like he'll be a regular starter under Maresca, he has the potential to be FPL gold at £6.5m

  15. Dat Guy Welbz
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Nkunku at 6.5 is just clownery.

    1. Feanor
      • 17 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      He'll get injured three or four times

  16. Tonyawesome69
    • 7 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    It'll be interesting to see where Maresca starts Nkunku. Could be a nice OOP pick assuming he stays fit.

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      Also didn't think he played enough games/mins to warrant change of position.

      https://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/comment/26640941

      1. Deulofail
        • 10 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        Guess the original positioning was based on conjecture anyway, so some evidence is better than none. Transfermarkt have him down as a support striker in Bundesliga, which doesn't really exist in PL (or at Chelsea) https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/christopher-nkunku/leistungsdaten/spieler/344381/plus/0?saison=2022
        So I guess the thinking was that he was either going to be the main striker (FPL forward) or an FPL midfielder. So far, he's not ousted Jackson, even when fit at the end of the season (and Chelsea playing their best football). Things could change of course, but I think it's a reasonable decision.

    2. I Member
      • 10 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      What was Maresca's preferred formation at Leicester?

      1. The Mentaculus
        • 5 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        433 with inverting FB & free 8s... Pep-ball

        1. I Member
          • 10 Years
          2 years, 7 days ago

          I'm guessing Nkunku will play on the left then.

          1. Zimo
            • 7 Years
            2 years, 7 days ago

            Could play instead of Jackson also possibly

            1. Andy_Social
              • 13 Years
              2 years, 7 days ago

              One to closely monitor pre-season - how Chelsea set up, Nkunku's role and position, and how defensively resilient Chelsea are - if they ain't, it makes an attacking double-up more likely.

              1. Zimo
                • 7 Years
                2 years, 7 days ago

                I'm considering him over Palmer and Havertz over Saka to afford Haaland and Salah with a good team still. Let's see what everyone is priced like.

  17. FPL Insanity
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 4 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    What's the latest thoughts on the game going live? Early next week after the Euro Final?

  18. MJF
    2 years, 7 days ago

    I can't wait for the "who do I sell to get Haaland?" posts after half an hour of Chelsea v City.

    1. CoracAld2831
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      Probably safer to just have him at the start, I guess.

  19. Total Slotball
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Brace yourself for the dozen’s of content creators vids on GW1 drafts with no Haaland. Only to put him in at the end due to “fomo”

    1. chocolove
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      Not watching them is a best decision.

  20. Red Red Robins
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Bruno @ 8.5 still

  21. I Member
    • 10 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Bruno Fernandes 8.5m

    1. JBG
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      Overpriced... he's not the attacking mid(he was playing like a shadow striker under OGS) he used to be and MU don't get pens as they used to.

      1. Andy_Social
        • 13 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        Depends on who United bring in though.

    2. Baps Hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      His role is unclear now imo. For me he's a wait and see.

    3. CoracAld2831
      • 5 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      If he is still on penalties, I'll take it.

  22. Dat Guy Welbz
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Another player underpriced by a full million… Hoping that FPL make the budget about 92-93 million to adjust to the severe deflation of player prices over the last decade.

    1. Andy_Social
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      We always say that, then when the season is underway, FPLTowers turn out to be like Southgate - smarter than we give them credit for.

      1. Dat Guy Welbz
        • 5 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        Well they certainly weren’t clever last season!

    2. F4L
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      if Foden isnt at least 10, Saka/Palmer 10.5, Son 11 and Isak 9.5 then its a fail. done haaland right but gave up after it seems

  23. Dynamic Duos
    • 12 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    More rubbish, gives us Foden, Saka, Palmer, Watkins etc

  24. Andy_Social
    • 13 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Toney and Mateta 7.5m

    Toney - very interesting if he moves to another FPL side.
    Mateta - without Olise and maybe Eze - hmm.

    1. F4L
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      its alright but for 0.5 more you get the starting striker of arguably the best performing team in the league last year.

  25. Dat Guy Welbz
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    A striker with 13 goals in his last 13 games sneaking in for 7.5 million. They might as well just get rid of the budget feature at this stage.

    1. Andy_Social
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      My initial pencil-draft is a 3-5-2. With 8m, 7.5m and 4.5m for my 3 forwards, that could give me a powered-up Midfield 5.

    2. Zimo
      • 7 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      He'll do next to nothing again with Olise gone and Eze too possibly.

    3. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      I don't think Mateta is overpriced personally. Without Olise, he's unlikely to deliver at the same level and he clearly hit an amazing streak at the end of the season.

      I prefer Havertz at 8.0m.

      1. Baps Hunter
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        I agree. Mateta was ok without Olise and Eze, but gold with them. When choosing Arsenal players it probably won't be monetary issue, but the problem is that we probably can't have 4 of them.

      2. Dat Guy Welbz
        • 5 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        Overpriced???

        1. Camzy
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          2 years, 7 days ago

          *underpriced hah

  26. Bobby Digital
    • 8 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Why is Kane a doubt?

    1. Andy_Social
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      For the final? Someone suggesting Watkins should start?

      1. Bobby Digital
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        He's a doubt in the game... Check for yourself

      2. Ahtikullervo
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        It was mainly Golbridge saying that after that goal he must start. No connection to Kane being a doubt. He will start.

    2. x.jim.x
      • 11 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      Southgate said he had a knock.

      1. Bobby Digital
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        Ok, cheers.. must've been from the Dumfries clash

        1. Andy_Social
          • 13 Years
          2 years, 7 days ago

          Okay, I got this from GS:
          And on injuries he said Harry Kane “took quite a big knock when he won the penalty”, while Kieran Trippier “had a little bit of a problem” but “could be OK” for Sunday.

          1. x.jim.x
            • 11 Years
            2 years, 7 days ago

            Shaw should be first name on the teamsheet for that final - we're just so much better with him playing

            1. Andy_Social
              • 13 Years
              2 years, 7 days ago

              He was underwhelming yesterday. It still depends how long he can last. If he can't manage 90/120 minutes, it's better to bring him on at half-time rather than take him off with ENG needing a goal.

  27. Dat Guy Welbz
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    What the prices should’ve been imo:

    Haaland: 14 million
    Harwood-Bellis: 4.5 million
    Pereira: 5 million
    Davis: 5 million
    Salah: 12 million
    Havertz: 9.5 million
    Richarlison: 8 million
    Hudson-Odoi: 6.5 million
    Semenyo: 6 million
    Pickford: 5 million
    Leno: 5 million
    Nkunku: 8 million
    March: 6.5 million
    Neto: 7.5 million
    Bruno: 10 million

    1. Bobby Digital
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      Pointless post, no fence

    2. Baps Hunter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      Captaincy makes Haaland worth 16.5-17 million if players like Havertz are 1.5 million underpriced.

      1. Andy_Social
        • 13 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        Not if he doesn't return every game, as in last season. I'm looking for a power-5 midfield, which I won't be able to afford with Haaland. The question is if I can include regular captain options if I also exclude Salah.

        1. Dat Guy Welbz
          • 5 Years
          2 years, 7 days ago

          If FPL towers had any brains the power 5 midfield wouldn’t be affordable like last season but they’re clowns so it appears that it’s affordable.

        2. _Freddo
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 17 Years
          2 years, 7 days ago

          Haaland would have to get double digits in most weeks to be worth it at 15.

          Might go Havertz, Watkins & Isak & just C Mo every week.

    3. chocolove
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      Bruno 10m. Lmao

      1. Dat Guy Welbz
        • 5 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        0.69xGA per 90 last season. Would be well worth that price in a non deflated world.

  28. Dat Guy Welbz
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    Another 2 players come in a million too cheap

    1. Andy_Social
      • 13 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      GORDON and BOWEN at 7.5m

      1. Bobby Digital
        • 8 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        Gordon home form vs. away form is ridiculous... I'm getting someone to rotate him with if I can afford it 😛

      2. Andy_Social
        • 13 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        Havertz, Gordon and Pickford inked in for me so far. Need some defender prices

  29. F4L
    • 11 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    that gordon price, thats 55% owned come GW1 or so. If Livra is in over Tripps this year means he'll have set-pieces as well as things stand

    should've been 8.5

    1. _Freddo
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 17 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      I just don’t see a world where people spend 15m on Haaland when there’s so many good strikers available.

      Havertz, Watkins, Isak, Toney, even Wood as a cheap one, with Salah a reliable C, I’m just not seeing the need for Haaland.

      1. Andy_Social
        • 13 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        Many will though. Not me, but I can see the benefit of having him as a perma-captain. Salah in a post-Klopp world might be riskier than normal.

        1. _Freddo
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 17 Years
          2 years, 7 days ago

          Possibly but their new manager seems attacking so I’m sure he’ll still get his numbers.

      2. F4L
        • 11 Years
        2 years, 7 days ago

        not sure. give it 3 GWs of casuals having a saka captain blank followed by a watkins blank and then a palmer blank and they'll be rushing for a Haaland captain reliable who went 2, 13, 7 in that time period

        1. _Freddo
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 17 Years
          2 years, 7 days ago

          Would that happen though? First impressions say you’ll either PermaC Mo & have no Haaland or PermaC Haaland & have no Mo, I’m not sure people will be hopping all over the place with captains.

          Might even be a season where you accept that you have to flip them based on fix runs, ie start with Mo then flip to Haaland when their fixs look more ‘green’

          People like Eze, Isak, Watkins etc were all getting big scores last year, having both Haaland & Salah might make it tricky to cover some of the cheaper reliable ones.

  30. Dat Guy Welbz
    • 5 Years
    2 years, 7 days ago

    It’s a great day to be a casual

    1. cravencottage
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      2 years, 7 days ago

      So you are having a great day