Scout Notes
19 June 2026 20 comments
avfc82 avfc82
Share:

A late flurry of goals, inspired by substitutes Johan Manzambi ($5.6m) and Ruben Vargas ($6.8m), led Switzerland to an emphatic 4-1 win over Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Here are our Scout Notes from the game, featuring match stats from our World Cup Toolkit page.

SWITZERLAND 4-1 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  • Goals: Manzambi x2, Vargas, Xhaka (pen) | Mahmic
  • Assists: Vargas x2, Embolo | Hadziahmetovic
  • Penalty won: Sow
  • Shot on target bonus: Ndoye
  • Tackle bonus: Aebischer, Rieder
  • Top points scorers: Manzambi (15), Vargas (15), Xhaka (10), Mahmic (9), Widmer (9), Embolo (7)

TEAM STATS

SCOUT NOTES

  • Switzerland comfortably beat Bosnia in the end, but scored all four goals after the 74th minute. Prior to that, the match was played almost exclusively on their terms, yet they struggled to find the necessary creativity and composure to break the deadlock.
  • Dan Ndoye ($6.8m) was heavily involved in that period and unlucky not to score with a superb, acrobatic effort. The Nottingham Forest man racked up four shots in total, claiming the shot on target bonus.
  • However, the match only burst into life after the introductions of wingers Manzambi and Vargas in the 71st minute. Manzambi fired Switzerland in front with a brilliant volley, after which Tarik Muharemovic ($3.9m) was sent off for denying a goalscoring opportunity. Vargas then netted the second, with Manzambi quickly adding a third. Granit Xhaka ($6.2m), the main man in the middle of the park, sealed the victory with a late penalty, notably with Breel Embolo ($7.5m) off the pitch.
  • Given Manzambi and Vargas’ impact off the bench, you suspect both players may start in Round 3.

“I told Vargas I would bring him on as soon as the opponents ​started to get more ​tired. We brought ⁠him on at the right time. Today it was a tactical decision.

“He [Manzambi] is a ​very happy person with so many football qualities. He can ⁠dribble, score and put a lot of pressure on opponents. He can surprise us as much as the opponent.” – Murat Yakin

  • As for Embolo, he got his tournament up and running from the penalty spot last week and supplied an assist here, earning Scouting Bonus points for the second successive round.
  • After this comprehensive victory, Switzerland (and Canada!) have taken charge of Group B, while Bosnia have it all to do against Qatar next week.
  • Encamped deep in their own half for much of this match, Ermin Mahmic ($4.2m) did at least score a consolation goal for Bosnia with a well-executed volley from distance.
  • Nico Elvedi ($4.3m), who sailed past the Scouting Bonus threshold earlier, unfortunately lost his clean sheet. He has now lost clean sheet points after the 90th minute in consecutive rounds. Silvan Widmer ($4.2m), who replaced Denis Zakaria ($6.1m) at right-back, fared better, having already been subbed off when Bosnia scored.
  • Back in the starting line-up, 40-year-old Edin Dzeko ($6.1m) led the line but was booked just after the hour mark and subbed shortly after.
  • Bosnia players – and in particular, uber cheap centre-back Nikola Katic ($3.8m) – were auditioning ahead of next week’s clash with Qatar. Although they won’t be a priority target for most Fantasy managers, they remained competitive in this match until the 74th minute and could still potentially offer value in Round 3, given the opposition.

“We have this third game and nothing is ⁠lost. We have to win it, of course, if we want ​to get further. This defeat is huge for us, but I don’t like whining. I told the players they have one hour ​to cheer up and lift their heads. Life goes on. We have another match ahead of us ​and, trust me, they will be ready.” – Sergej Barbarez


20 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Captainmeekho
    1 month, 22 days ago

    From the FPL perspective, Swiss defence has never been lucky to keep the Clean sheet, back to back late goal

    1. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      1 month, 22 days ago

      really annoying

    2. PartyTime
      • 5 Years
      1 month, 22 days ago

      Inject swiss pain into my blood vessels after 90 minutes

    3. Assisting the assister
      • 10 Years
      1 month, 22 days ago

      Luckily had Widmer who kept his cleanie by being subbed

  2. Yozzer
    • 8 Years
    1 month, 22 days ago

    A few people saying they should implement this under 5% rule in FPL. I mean sure it's a great rule and I think the FIFA scoring is always better than the rubbish FPL implement but I don't think this would work in FPL. Not only would it turn players against the content creators, and don't underestimate how FPL adore these people because of the free marketing they bring, but also it would slow the price rise system down to an halt which is a big part of their game. Players would wait till deadline to ensure percentages are below the threshold.

    I think it would be too complicated for them but what they could do is make the percentage count as soon as he player is purchased This would give the pure model copiers a conundrum as they never go early and also would promote an extra strategy of going early or waiting for info .

    Thoughts? Interesting debate non the less as I thought FPL was at an all time low last season

    1. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      1 month, 22 days ago

      I'd like it if they could make the scouting bonus active upon time of purchase. That way it rewards managers willing to move early and against the herd.

      1. Yozzer
        • 8 Years
        1 month, 22 days ago

        Yeah that's what I mean Camzy. I think it would be amazing if they did that but I don't know how hard it is to make that happen

    2. The Mentaculus
      • 5 Years
      1 month, 22 days ago

      Turning players against content creators and, to a lesser extent, slowing pre-deadline transfers, would both be outcomes I'd be very happy with. Plus the template gets so strong (largely because of CCs), so I'd definitely be in favour of this to diversify teams

      1. Yozzer
        • 8 Years
        1 month, 22 days ago

        Absolutely agree but FPL will want to keep content creators and avoid the community turning against them which slowly seems to be happening anyway but that would hurt them

    3. theplayer
      • 12 Years
      1 month, 22 days ago

      The content creators would be all over the under 5% players so not sure how this would be turning against them. And even if it did turn people against them, who cares?

      1. Yozzer
        • 8 Years
        1 month, 22 days ago

        You buy a gem u under 5% then Andy and Harry find it too. They tell everyone they must buy him. He's then is 5 2 % at deadline. They all decide not to buy him but you already have him. Because of them you lost your bonus. Would you be happy? I wouldn't

        Oh I wouldn't care as I would rather play a game where they are not feeding the masses but FPL will care unfortunately. They promote their game for them

  3. Tomsk
    • 5 Years
    1 month, 22 days ago

    Anyone care to predict a 0.1% owned player who will score in round 2? (Not from yesterday’s games obvs).

    I’ll go for Vite for Ecuador v Curacao

    1. Haa-lala-land
      • 5 Years
      1 month, 22 days ago

      Plata the Ecuador forward, only because Vs Curacao

    2. z13
      • 1 Year
      1 month, 22 days ago

      Started with Yeboah last week for this game

      1. z13
        • 1 Year
        1 month, 22 days ago

        Oops, but he's up to 0.7% now

  4. Qaiss
    • 10 Years
    1 month, 22 days ago

    Arsenal at home to Coventry first game apparently

    What price does Gabriel have to be to not be 80% owned?

  5. Camzy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    1 month, 22 days ago

    Just saw that Salah went up to 5.1% owned. Frustrating. Really wanted those bonus scouting points.

    Theo Hernandez also crept over 5%.

    1. Haa-lala-land
      • 5 Years
      1 month, 22 days ago

      Its a fault in the design, if future MD3 transfers affect past MD2 transfers

      1. KAPTAIN KANE SERVES THE PAI…
        • 9 Years
        1 month, 22 days ago

        Correct - the scoring for the threshold should be based on the previous week’s ownership

        1. x.jim.x
          • 11 Years
          1 month, 22 days ago

          Should be based on the percentage at which you transferred them in, like prices in FPL