Pro Pundits

My best replacements for injured De Bruyne ahead of FPL Gameweek 20

Fantasy Premier League managers are now frantically searching for a viable replacement for Kevin De Bruyne (£11.9m) ahead of Gameweek 20.

I recently signed the Manchester City midfielder for Double Gameweek 19 and, considering he is our for four to six weeks according to Pep Guardiola’s last estimate, he is going straight back out again.

But who to replace him with? That is the key question, which I will look to answer in my latest article about how my team is faring in 2020/21.

BEST DE BRUYNE REPLACEMENTS

I excluded Bruno Fernandes (£11.3m) and Mohamed Salah (£12.5m) from my shortlist of five possible candidates since I already have them in my team but I think both of them are clearly the best choices if you are a non-owner. Despite modest performances in the Double Gameweek, we all know what they are capable of and both of them are set-and-forget picks for me right now.

RAHEEM STERLING (£11.4m): Manchester City plays against West Brom and Sheffield United in the next two Gameweeks so it is tempting to make a direct switch from De Bruyne to one of his teammates. Having started seven of the last eight Premier League matches, Sterling is probably the most nailed and explosive option among City’s midfielders, in my opinion. Looking at his numbers, if we split his season in half, it becomes clear his expected goals and assists per 90 minutes increased a lot in the past few months.

Sterling’s expected Goal Involvement xGI) per 90 minutes (Gameweeks 1 to 9 on the left and Gameweeks 10 to 19 on the right)

Regardless of this improvement, I think he is clearly overpriced this season, especially if we compare him with the likes of Fernandes, Son or even Grealish. Coupled with the ever-present possibility of a random benching in an easy fixture, I doubt Sterling is the best available option to replace De Bruyne.

SON HEUNG-MIN (£9.7m): After selling Son last week, I was fairly settled on Salah, De Bruyne and Fernandes as my heavy-hitters of choice going forward. But unfortunately, injuries cannot be predicted and so, Son is back on my plans once again.

At first glance Spurs’ fixtures seem really tough which may scare potential investors in the South Korean superstar. They do play against Liverpool, Chelsea and Manchester City in three of the next five Gameweeks, which is far from ideal. On the bright side, however, three of the next four matches are at home and it seems to be the perfect moment to play against Liverpool and Chelsea, given their recent poor form.

All in all, I think Son is definitely one of the best (if not the absolute best) options to replace De Bruyne. His attacking numbers are great, his finishing is second to none in the Premier League and his pricing seems fair considering what he offers.

JACK GREALISH (£7.7m): With just one attacking return in the last four Gameweeks, Grealish has been underwhelming as an FPL asset lately, which will possibly deter further investment from non-owners like me. It’s important to note, however, that he played against Chelsea, United and City and yet, he still managed to create the second most chances among all midfielders, only behind Mason Mount (£6.8m).

I think Grealish is still a great option going forward. He is at the heart of an impressive Aston Villa team and he is nailed to play 90 minutes in every single match, which is a very important factor these days. Even without spot-kick duties, I think he offers an impressive mixture of safety, attacking threat and price.

PHIL FODEN (£6.3m): With five shots inside the box and six chances created against Aston Villa, Foden immediately positioned himself as an appealing option for those on the market for a midfielder.

However, even after De Bruyne’s injury, Guardiola has a lot of attacking options at his disposal and I think it’s highly unlikely Foden will suddenly become a nailed starter, regardless of how many goals he scores or how many chances he creates.

I’m sure he will be worth £6.3m, even with the odd benching but, with so much money available right now, I don’t feel like sweating City’s lineup every Gameweek when there are several more reliable and safe options to pick from.

ILKAY GUNDOGAN (£5.5m):Having scored five goals in the last seven matches while playing at least 70 minutes in every single one of them, Gundogan looks like an absolute bargain, especially now that there is an extra-spot available in City’s midfield.

If we add spot-kick duties and two amazing fixtures to the equation, Gundogan becomes really hard to ignore. The only downside I can think of is the possibility of a rest very soon, given how much he has been playing lately and his history of long-term injuries.

CONCLUSION

At the moment, I managed to discard Sterling and Foden and it seems like my decision will most likely be between Son and Gundogan (although Grealish is still in the mix).

If you are looking to upgrade someone for a hit or even for free next week, I think the decision is fairly easy. Gundogan offers insane value right now with great attacking numbers, decent expected minutes and penalty-duties for just £5.5m.

For the rest of us, who are looking to buy the best possible option regardless of price , I think it’s really close between Son and Gundogan. It’s actually quite possible I get Son for De Bruyne this week and Gundogan for Soucek next week but, with three days still to go until the deadline, I am waiting a bit more before making my final decision. 

GET IN-GAME DATA AT LIVE FPL

Check your own rank and in-play FPL stats on LiveFPL.net every Gameweek

1,673 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Alisson WondHaaland
    • 8 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Watkins out of nowhere up to 2 Baps? Ill gladly take it

    1. DA Minnion (Former great)
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Same

    2. Volley127
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Down to 1

    3. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
      • 14 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      1 and he didn't deserve that

    4. Captain Vantastic™
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Lol on 0 bonus now. Nice

      1. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
        • 14 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Good

    5. Jebiga
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Lol

    6. Alisson WondHaaland
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      This aged well

  2. DA Minnion (Former great)
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    20 points from that game. Was worth the wait.

    1. Mile Plankton
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      34 here

      1. Mile Plankton
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Oops, I was counting Targetts points from City game too.
        28 from this one

        1. S.Kuqi
          • 11 Years
          3 years, 2 months ago

          Massive gw for you. Well done

  3. R.C
    • 6 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    101 all out.

    Glad to be in the 100s club.

    1. DA Minnion (Former great)
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      107 here if baps hold without playing a chip. Happy with that.

      1. R.C
        • 6 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Yep didn't play any chip as well. Happy days.

    2. Salah’s Sonnet
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Same! 101

    3. Heisenberg W. W.
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      126

    4. aleksaa2
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      118(-4)

    5. TRIPOS TOPPER
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      95

      I think the smallest green arrow ever but with no chip will take it

      1. CheesyZoot
        • 4 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        131 (-4) no chips

        v. pleased

        1. Sheffield Wednesday
          • 3 Years
          3 years, 2 months ago

          Superb result

          1. CheesyZoot
            • 4 Years
            3 years, 2 months ago

            Cheers

    6. Sid1891
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      137 good dgw for me

    7. Sheffield Wednesday
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      121 (-4) despite El Ghazi and Zouma returning just 2 points from 4 matches.

      1. Sheffield Wednesday
        • 3 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Kinda wish I had Stones instead of Zouma...

  4. Big boy Bowen
    • 7 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Grealish BAPs?

    1. Salah’s Sonnet
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Zero

    2. Volley127
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      No

    3. Lev Yashin
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Nopes

  5. FCSB
    • 8 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Martinez
    Robertson Stones Cancelo Coufal
    Salah KDB Fernandes Rahpinha
    Vardy Bamford

    Forster Soucek Brewster Ferguson

    1 FT, 0.2 itb

    1. KDB >> Gundogan (play Soucek over Vardy)
    2. KDB Vardy >> Gundogan Kane (-4)
    3. Something else??

    Thanks!

  6. Shark Team
    • 6 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    For the next 3:
    A) Gundogan Madisson
    B) Cancelo Madisson -4
    C) Cancelo Rashford -4

    1. Salah’s Sonnet
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      A

    2. Avery
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      A

  7. TheBiffas
    • 3 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Bench two:

    Raphinha
    Bamford
    Antonio
    Watkins
    Coufal

    1. Flynny
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Definitely coufal

    2. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
      • 14 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Watkins and coufal. Not even close

    3. BeWater
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Watkins and Coufal.

    4. Tony Moon
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Easily Coupar and Raph. Defo not Watkins, silly advice.

      1. Tony Moon
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Coupar? Coufal!

      2. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
        • 14 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Have you ever watched him play ? It's very good advice. He's dog shite

        1. Tony Moon
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          3 years, 2 months ago

          Yes, every game. His xG is way more than Rafa. All his stats are better actually, if you check the members area. Oh, you can't...

          1. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
            • 14 Years
            3 years, 2 months ago

            Yes i have access to stats thanks. . Not that i use em. I aint getting brainwashed by that XG rubbish. Prefer to play the way it should be played. Good old eye test and Watkins looks pretty bad. High xg because he misses so many easy chances ? Not a player i want. Misleading

            1. Tony Moon
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 14 Years
              3 years, 2 months ago

              Eye test looks very good to me, excellent positioning and the team create so many chances. Much better option than Rapha. Yes, Watkins misses chances, but if he'd sort out his slightly offside positioning, he could have had another 3 or 4 goals. Watkins xG over last four games is 1.26; Rapha's is 0.23 - says it all. xG is a pretty reliable test, like it or not.

              Plus, Burnley are next for Watkins - who have the worst team stats for chances conceded in central positions. Watkins has much more potential than Rapha. This game is about playing the odds and interpreting the relevant stats, and based on that, Watkins is easily a better choice for next game than Rapha.

              1. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
                • 14 Years
                3 years, 2 months ago

                A player misses a lot of easy chances gets an high XG. I'd rather have players scoring goals than missing chances. Not the way ill ever play this game as i would rather do my own thing than go by what OPTA tell me to do. Not much fun in that to keep me intrested. I do ok without all that

                Burnley away is not an easy game for anyone. Especially with Mee back. Raphinha isn't great but regardless what XG, XA, XXX tells me to do i know that i would have Raphinia vs a very bad Newcastle . Over Watkins vs Burnley away anyday of the week. You can make stats fit the narrative anyway you want if you try hard enough but they don't tell the full story. Not for me anyway. Each to their own

                1. Tony Moon
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 14 Years
                  3 years, 2 months ago

                  Indeed, each to their own. Rapha is getting nowhere near my team - he'd ruin my good rank! But you are missing the point somewhat. Watkins is getting the chances. Rapha isn't. Regardless or not of whether a player is burying the chances, I'd much rather have a player who is getting them in the first place over one that isn't. And Burnley have still conceded more chances from central positions than any other team, even with Mee playing.

              2. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
                • 14 Years
                3 years, 2 months ago

                Ps don't you feel like playing by OPTA's numbers takes away any achievement? I mean it's not really your own work if filtering a table dictates your decisions. Never really understood it but i guess everyone thinks different

                1. Tony Moon
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 14 Years
                  3 years, 2 months ago

                  Haha, nice attempt at a dig! 🙂 Stats play about 20% (if that) in my decision making. So I don't play by stats. I look at them, and then decide if they represent the eye test for me. Like you, it's mainly about the eye test for me. The stats I like to look at most is the defensive stats for teams - they're often illuminating, about where a team is weakest. So, no, I don't play by OPTA stats, by any stretch of the imagination!

                  Good luck nonetheless!

                  1. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
                    • 14 Years
                    3 years, 2 months ago

                    Fair enough. No dig. I have always been open about my feelings toward stats on here and that's how i feel. People who use stats only can't consider themselves as good managers because it isn't their own work. Obviously i don't expect people to agree with that but i genuinely feel that way. I guess they have their part to play for some. Only time i use them is when i can't decide between two players so i use a comparison.

                    Gl to you too

                    1. Tony Moon
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 14 Years
                      3 years, 2 months ago

                      Cheers. Agree with you re. stats. I look at lots when I'm bored and then ignore most!

    5. Avery
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      R & C

      Prefer to keep FWDs on

    6. Ozzy smith
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Coufal + Raph easily

      1. Tony Moon
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        This. Defo

  8. Flynny
    • 9 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Hi folks. Slowly climbing the ranks after awful start and gone from 1.3m to 600k in 2 weeks.

    Planning kdb to gundog which allows for bamford to kane after. Sounds like a decent plan? Cheers

    Martinez Johnstone
    Cancelo dias Chilwell coufal dallas
    Salah kdb Bruno grealish soucek
    Antonio Watkins bamford

  9. Pat Bonner
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    100 points and a red arrow!

    1. JONALDINHO
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Hits?

    2. Sun Jihai
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Must be hits? Never know if people are giving their scores on here on a gross or net basis, when it's the net that matters...

  10. sully29
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Kane or Son until GW25 and why?

    1. JONALDINHO
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Son. He does far better against teams that play high lines. 4 of the next 5 suit him. 1 of the next 5 suits Kane

  11. JONALDINHO
    • 6 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Is Bamford to Kane worth it after the Pool game? Bamford’s time up?

    1. Flynny
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      That's my plan

  12. Miguel Sanchez
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    121 all out

    1. JONALDINHO
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Nice. 117 here with no chips played

  13. Mile Plankton
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Got 40 points from the bench, played BB.
    Sanchez, Saka, Targett, Holding.

    1. puhd
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Nice mate

  14. SouthCoastSaint
    • 12 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    My brother just won his cup game 111-110 because Matt Targett scored 12 points.

    Epic

    1. Jebiga
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Awesome

    2. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
      • 14 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Don't think Epic will be bothered but i can ask him for you

  15. puhd
    • 9 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    72 points... and I benched Targett!
    Can’t believe how well he’s done, I played James over him.

    1. puhd
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Should have played BB

    2. Sarri-ball
      • 14 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      I had bellerin over targett as was worried targett would pick up yellow v city. Luckly bellerin didnt play

      1. Jebiga
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Lolo

  16. BeWater
    • 3 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    82 all out. I'm glad this gameweek is finally over!

    1. bitm2007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      My too. 80 all out. My team didn't even score a goal !

      1. BeWater
        • 3 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        I only got 4 attacking returns. 2 goals and 2 assists.

        1. bitm2007
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 9 Years
          3 years, 2 months ago

          5 CS's, 3 assists, 0 goals for me. I think I've just survived in LMS somehow.

  17. Jebiga
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    18 pts from Grealish and Targett tonight. Nice

  18. AzzaroMax99
    • 7 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Watkins to get winning goal bps?

    1. Jebiga
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      I think 3 baps

    2. Captain Vantastic™
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Sure. He's gonna get a big fat 0 m8

      1. Jebiga
        • 11 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Hahaha

      2. AzzaroMax99
        • 7 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        He’s a walking disaster. I’m so glad that I sold him for Antonio few days ago.

    3. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Doesn’t look like it. Ah well.

    4. Ejaaz11
      • 8 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Winning goal baps are added during the game when the goal is scored

    5. Duke Silver ☑
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Just FYI, winning goal BPS is added during the game this season.

      1. AzzaroMax99
        • 7 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        Didn’t know that. Thx

    6. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
      • 14 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      No they are factored in this season. They are already there

  19. djman102
    • 14 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Since the first FA Cup game tomorrow is early AM across the pond, I'll put the implications here. Haven't looked yet, but I'm sure Ben Crellin has plenty more details for anyone who wants to delve further.

    Chelsea are in an FA Cup pool with all lower league teams (though Luton have history with upsetting PL teams). If Chelsea lose, we are guaranteed two of the following games in 29: CPL-MUN, LIV-CHE, WHM-ARS (note one of CPL-MUN and WHM-ARS is guaranteed regardless). Clearly, for the FH29ers, you want Chelsea to make the QF and Liverpool to not make the QF.

    1. Chrisitis
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      If pool-chelsea play eachother in 29 what makes the difference? Doesnt matter which one of them who wins?

      1. djman102
        • 14 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        No, but if both reach the QF, it reduces the number of possible blanks, since two of the QFists would be scheduled to play each other. If the 8 QF teams are all in different games, we get 8 blanks in 29 (and likely 8 extra games in 26)

  20. puhd
    • 9 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Vardy out for who?
    Got Bamford and Adams

    1. BeWater
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Kane if you can upgrade. Antonio if you want to use the funds elsewhere.

    2. TheDragon
      • 5 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      1. Antonio
      2. Kane
      3. Blankins (ie Watkins)

  21. BeWater
    • 3 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Steve Bruce in every post match press conference:

    We'll dust worselves off and gan again.

  22. Jebiga
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    123 pts is decent score this gw ?
    I love that i saved FH, TC, BB and WC

    1. Saka Punch
      • 5 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Of course?

      1. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
        • 14 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        You are gullible.

      2. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
        • 14 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        He's fishing 😉

    2. Sun Jihai
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      'decent' with no chips
      Gosh coming on here after a GW is not good!

  23. Alisson WondHaaland
    • 8 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Bamford (C) ?

    1. Jebiga
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Lol

  24. Deulofail
    • 8 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Good evening all!
    How would you line up this team?

    Martinez
    (C)ancelo Stones Tierney
    Saka Gundo Bruno(v) Son
    Antonio Bamford Martial

    McCarthy | ESR, TAA, Mitch

    0FTs. 7.8 ITB.

    1. Jebiga
      • 11 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Nice thinking

    2. noahzark22
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Looks good

  25. Wild Rover
    • 13 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    92.6% rank change percentage

    1. Captain Vantastic™
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Amazing!

    2. Duke Silver ☑
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      How many points from the bench?

      1. Wild Rover
        • 13 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        33, no wankery

        1. Duke Silver ☑
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 9 Years
          3 years, 2 months ago

          Nice one.

    3. Rash
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Wow nice!

      69% here which im chuffed with.

    4. Sun Jihai
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Amazing! Score?

      1. Wild Rover
        • 13 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        165 (-8)

        1. Sun Jihai
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          3 years, 2 months ago

          Jeez! Take a bow!

        2. Don Kloppeone
          • 6 Years
          3 years, 2 months ago

          Unbelievable score mate. Well done!

          1. Wild Rover
            • 13 Years
            3 years, 2 months ago

            I had that score a few days ago, nobody from Liverpool or Villa

            1. Don Kloppeone
              • 6 Years
              3 years, 2 months ago

              Now ur just rubbing it in 😆

        3. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
          • 14 Years
          3 years, 2 months ago

          Don't make me fetch Shadders

          1. Wild Rover
            • 13 Years
            3 years, 2 months ago

            😀

    5. Don Kloppeone
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      That’s insane!

      I was pleased with my 52%!

      OR now?!

      1. Wild Rover
        • 13 Years
        3 years, 2 months ago

        5.6k, down from 3.9 today as no players

        1. Don Kloppeone
          • 6 Years
          3 years, 2 months ago

          Brilliant mate!

    6. Sid1891
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Congratulations
      Mine over 70%

    7. chrismoo75
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      27k to 6k myself

    8. Bojam
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      79.73% here. 140 points (BB), no hits. Climbed from ~144k to ~29k. Nose bleed territory for me.

  26. Spg76
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Targett and Traore just knocked me out of the cup

    1. Pumpkinhead - I'm ITK …
      • 14 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Cup is a waste of time. Pointless distraction that you are never going to win. Be happy 🙂

  27. Saka Punch
    • 5 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Bench one:

    A) Soucek (cry)
    B) Dallas (new)
    C) Coufal (cry)

    1. Spg76
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      I feel Newcastle can’t score and Soucek has dropped deeper since Antonio came into team I believe? Coufal starts for me.

  28. Jebiga
    • 11 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Targett you beautie ! Woohoo

  29. Rash
    • 6 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Gundog or foden as my 3rd man City spot?

    Or get stones for 3 defenders with cancelo and dias?

    1. BeWater
      • 3 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Gundog.

  30. Lanley Staurel
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    3 years, 2 months ago

    Managed to move from a low of a 5m rank to below 500k after this GW. Actually more enjoyable than my usual battle to try and get into the top 100k or 10k and never usually managing it.

    1. djman102
      • 14 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      I was 3.6M in GW7 and have just gotten into the top 500K as well. Well done!

    2. chrismoo75
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      2.2m in GW 3 to 6k after 10 green arrows on trot

    3. Bojam
      • 6 Years
      3 years, 2 months ago

      Cool - nice one! I was 3.8m after GW3. Around 29k now. Have enjoyed the battle to get back to respectability, now in unknown territory!