Members

FPL Double Gameweek 29: How will Casemiro’s ban affect Man Utd?

Manchester United will be without Casemiro (£4.9m) for their next three Premier League games after he was sent off against Southampton, his second red card of the season.

The first of his four-match ban was served in the FA Cup win over Fulham last weekend, but he will also be absent for the top-flight clashes with Newcastle United and Brentford in Double Gameweek 29, plus Everton in Gameweek 30.

The Brazilian has emerged as a key player for Erik ten Hag’s side since joining from Real Madrid, but just how much will Man Utd miss him?

With United players near the top of many FPL managers’ shopping lists, we look at the underlying numbers.

CASEMIRO’S INDIVIDUAL STATS

Casemiro is excellent defensively and despite missing the early part of the season, leads the way among teammates for tackles won, as detailed below.

He also ranks among the top three performers at Old Trafford per 90 minutes for interceptions and ball recoveries.

Added to that, the Brazilian also wins the ball aerially more than anyone else, with 35 of his 51 duels won.

Division-wide, he’s up there with the best of the FPL midfielders for most of the key underlying metrics:

Per 90 minutesRank v other FPL midfielders (min 10 apps)
Aerial duels won2.343rd
Tackles won3.883rd
Clearances, blocks and interceptions (CBIs)4.962nd

Teammate Scott McTominay (£4.9m) is actually the only FPL midfielder to better Casemiro for CBIs per 90 minutes but neither the Scot nor any other player in this position is as consistently strong as the Brazilian spoiler across all three categories.

With centre-back pairing Raphael Varane (£4.8m) and Lisandro Martinez (£4.5m) behind him, Erik ten Hag has built a strong spine, with Casemiro’s tenacity in midfield key.

However, his influence isn’t restricted to just defending.

United are also losing their second most creative player behind Bruno Fernandes (£9.6m) for expected assists (xA), proof of his growing influence in the attacking third. That’s something he discussed earlier in the season, saying “Every player has their role, maybe here [at Man Utd] I have got more of a creative role.”

Above: Casemiro’s chances created 2022/23 (assists in green)

TEAM STATS: WITH AND WITHOUT CASEMIRO

Haaland Foden


200 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Oscar Slater
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Hmmm, Scotland as low as 1/6 to beat Cyprus today. I really must put my life savings on that. 😯

  2. Bubbles1985
    • 7 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Current BB29 squad:

    Kepa (Steele)
    Mings Tripp Shaw Chilwell (Gabriel)
    Saka Rashford(c) Mitoma(vc) Maddison (Ode)
    Havertz Watkins (Kane)

    2.6m itb and 1ft

    This is with -4 taken:

    Kepa
    Mings Tripp Shaw Chilwell
    Saka Rashford(c) Mitoma(vc) Maddison
    Havertz Watkins

    Steele Kane Benrahma Estupinan

    Leaves 4.4m itb. Plan to get Haaland back next week. Could get Bowen instead, if I lose Kane for Haaland instead of Watkins/Hav

    How does it look??

    1. tbos83
      • 3 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Really not sure about taking a -4 to bring in Benrahma

      1. Bubbles1985
        • 7 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Nah, me neither tbh. But i go to all WH games and he is a cheap punt to hold free cash.

        After this GW I want cheap fodder on the bench, hopefully!

      2. Bubbles1985
        • 7 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        I guess Bowen is more nailed but 2.5m more.

    2. CONNERS
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I don't think WH have done enough lately to consider bringing in their players, let alone for a hit.

      I'd be more inclined to get March or MacAllister.

      1. Bubbles1985
        • 7 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        March is a better shout actually and less cash.

        Too much with Estupinan?

        Maybe save the hit and keep Gabriel

    3. CONNERS
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Not at all. I think triple Brighton is a must for the remainder of the season given their form and extra fixtures.

      The fact that their midfielders are so cheap just adds to the appeal.

      1. Bubbles1985
        • 7 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Valid.

        I think Bowen or Benrahma was more in hope than anything. Nice when you see your team's players do well! Plus the DGW fixtures are ok for us.

        Double Brighton for -4 actually works quite well with the money itb

    4. Bluetiger1
      • 1 Year
      1 year, 1 month ago

      go with
      Kepa (Steele)
      Mings Tripp Shaw Chilwell (Gabriel)
      Saka Rashford(c) Mitoma(vc) Maddison (Ode)
      Havertz Watkins (Kane)

    5. agueroooooney
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I'm BBing your first team for a hit... Not great news for me. I'd probably avoid Benrahma and just do one of Gabriel -> Estupinan or Ode -> March

    6. Abusive_Sgt_Daelrhos
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Steele nailed on now right? Rashford fit to play both? I see he’s flagged.

  3. Shark Team
    • 6 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    We have to wait for more info but if it’s true that Haaland isn’t training and he is “touch and go” for Liverpool then he may get rested or mins manager in any of the 2 PL games between the UCL fixtures vs Bayern:
    1/4: Liverpool
    8/4: Southampton
    11/4: Bayern
    15/4: Leicester
    19/04: Bayern

    1. The Mentaculus
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 2 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Could be tempting for some to leave him out til 33/4 if no FH for 32. I'll be bringing him back for Southampton if fit though

      1. Shark Team
        • 6 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        I have WC33 BB34 plan so I’m guessing I will opt for Salah from gw31 instead of Haaland

    2. Oscar Slater
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Here's the thing about Haaland...he's played in 16 games this year and scored 15 goals but 13 of those goals have been scored against diddy teams. He's failed against Chelsea, Manchester United, Arsenal, Spurs and Newcastle in that time so I'm quite happy not to have him in my team against Liverpool, who for all their faults this season, are nobody's mugs.

      1. agueroooooney
        • 9 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Liverpool are not in the same bracket as those teams this year

  4. CONNERS
    • 5 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Any logic in losing Mee for Shaw in gw29 instead of Zinch?

    I can't see a CS in either of Brentford's games.

    1. The Mentaculus
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 2 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      That's the logic right there. Plus Shaw has more attacking threat, and even if Utd do concede without Casemiro, at least he's in place for EVE, DGW34 etc

    2. CONNERS
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Yeah, that's my thinking too.

      I also have Raya and don't think double BRE defence is optimal for gw29.

      Thanks

      1. Wobbles
        • 3 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Having Raya also would mean a yes from me. Better long term move.

  5. Bluetiger1
    • 1 Year
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Any news / feed on Arsenal Saliba injury

  6. Maeki2
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 3 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    BB this any worth a - 4?
    Kepa
    Estupin, Robertson, Trippier, Chilwell
    Rashford, Gakpo, McAllister, Mitoma
    Toney, Kane
    Messiler, Haaland, Martinelli, Akanji

    Was thinking of Akanji but to who also need. Over for blank 32

    1. Bluetiger1
      • 1 Year
      1 year, 1 month ago

      shaw

      1. Maeki2
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 3 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        He is not playing 32

        1. Bluetiger1
          • 1 Year
          1 year, 1 month ago

          ah - good call

          1. Bluetiger1
            • 1 Year
            1 year, 1 month ago

            Maybe then Aston Villa Defender in Cash or Mings!

            1. Fitzy.
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 12 Years
              1 year, 1 month ago

              Cash injured I think

              1. Maeki2
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 3 Years
                1 year, 1 month ago

                Brent, Villa, Newcastle or Liverpool def can have any

                1. Bluetiger1
                  • 1 Year
                  1 year, 1 month ago

                  Just looking now - Liverpool if cash available could be interesting with playing GW32 & DGW in 34
                  & in GW29 DGW (tough fixtures ) but pay off!

              2. Bluetiger1
                • 1 Year
                1 year, 1 month ago

                Thanks Fitzy - unaware

              3. Hint
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 4 Years
                1 year, 1 month ago

                Is he? News to me. Mings a better shout anyway. Or Moreno, but less sure of minutes.

    2. SAKA AND EMILE SMITH ROWE
      • 7 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Despite they’ve been poor all season, I’m looking at a West Ham DF. Nice double in GW29 and Bournemouth (a) in BGW32

  7. Bluetiger1
    • 1 Year
    1 year, 1 month ago

    best option for GW29 captain after IB?

    1. CONNERS
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Rashford, Brighton mid, Maddison would be my top 3 capt picks (of the players I own).

      1. Wild Rover
        • 13 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Maybe Chilwell - Home to both Villa and TAA 😉

    2. The Mentaculus
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 2 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I haven't decided yet but my shortlist is essentially the 4 mentioned above. Maybe cooling on Maddison a bit

  8. RUUD!
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Those with WC and FH remaining what is the best plan to use these? I have both and bench boosting a solid team in 29.

    1. The Mentaculus
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 2 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      FH32 WC33/4 is probably what I would do

      1. Wild Rover
        • 13 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Replied to you on last article hot topiic. 🙂

        1. The Mentaculus
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 2 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          Got it. Think your options are more open than mine then; offered a couple thoughts on your situation in that thread

    2. CABAYE4
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I’m thinking:

      BB29
      WC33
      TC34
      FH - whenever I need it, if not 37/38.

      1. snow pea in repose
        • 3 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Last season, I FH on GW38. I do not recommend it, way too many variables

    3. agueroooooney
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Not sure, have WC, BB and FH left, might weigh up WC33 and BB34 the current plan is to BB this week then play it by ear for the other two

  9. cigan
    • 5 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Anything worth taking a hit for on this BB (apart from the 2nd keeper if Fabianski's fit)?

    Raya Areola
    Chilwell Trippier Shaw Estupinan Henry
    Rashford Maddison March Saka Martinelli
    Toney Watkins Kane

    1. agueroooooney
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Don't think so

  10. Silecro
    • 6 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    If somehow IB goes through without major injuries, would you do these two moves? BB active

    Ward, Almiron > DDG, Harrison
    2ft

    Team as of now
    Raya, Ward*
    Mings, Trippier, Botman, Dunk, Estu
    Saka, Rashford, Mitoma, Almiron*, Maddison
    Kane, Toney, Mbeumo

    8.1 itb for Haaland in gw29

  11. Gazzpfc
    • 7 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Ward Zinchenko Martinelli
    To
    Kepa Shaw Bruno

    Worth it?

    1. CONNERS
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Probably a net gain over the rest of the season, (given those players extra/kinder fixtures), although Arsenal's fixture is good this week so it could take 2-3 gw's for the gains to materialise depending on results.

      I'm actually coming round to the idea of selling Saka over Martinelli as it enables me to get a far superior-looking team for the rest of the season taking the remaining doubles into account.

    2. agueroooooney
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I'd keep Martinelli in his current form

  12. Gazzpfc
    • 7 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Ward Zinchenko Martinelli Saka
    To
    Kepa Shaw Bruno March

    Worth it???

    1. Wobbles
      • 3 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      No way!

  13. Sandy Ravage
    • 8 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    From GW30 onwards:
    Toney + Chilwell > Isak + VVD?

    1. Sandy Ravage
      • 8 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      *32

    2. CONNERS
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Just the Toney to Isak move imo.

      1. Sandy Ravage
        • 8 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        what about Robertson instead of VVD?

  14. CABAYE4
    • 12 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Worth a -8 to BB29 and then allow myself to focus on getting money in the 11 for WC33?

    Ward, Tarkowski, Andreas to Steele, Shaw, Rashford (-8)?

    Alternative is just the Rashford move and saving BB for a later day but BB34 looks difficult for cheap DGWers.

    1. The Mentaculus
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 2 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      For those moves, yes, I would go for it

      1. CABAYE4
        • 12 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Thanks

    2. gart888
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Seems a bit counter intuitive to take a huge hit shortly before WC... How are you going to navigate 32 when you bring all those guys in?

      1. CABAYE4
        • 12 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Will aim to have 9 with 2FT to use for 32.

        All 3 of those I’d be bringing in would be benched 32.

    3. FourLokoLeipzig
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Why not play your TC this week and BB 34 after your wildcard? Basically avoids a -8 by switching the chips around

      1. CABAYE4
        • 12 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        It’s an option.

        But Haaland in 34 looks a standout TC and no clear pick this GW. And BB in 34 looks tricky.

        1. The Mentaculus
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 2 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          Agreed. I'm on the same plan & it'd definitely take more than -8 to get me to switch TC off Haaland. Haven't even decided on a captain for 29 yet

        2. FourLokoLeipzig
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 6 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          I expect Rashford to haul again this week but yeah, Haaland is a better pick in isolation - tricky decision

  15. BlzE_94
    • 9 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Martinelli -> Barnes worth a hit?

    1. BlzE_94
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Or Saka -> Maddison for a hit
      Or neither

    2. CABAYE4
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Not for me

  16. It’s A Joke
    • 13 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Are we expecting Rashford and Pope to be back for the upcoming GW?

    1. Bushwhacker
      • 4 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Well Rashford should have no issues, clearly did the Man U pull out for England. Pope less clear but likely the same.

    2. Lord.
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Provided he gets back from New York in time.

    3. CONNERS
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Yep. Both appear to be classic "international break injuries".

      Rashford has been on holiday wandering around NYC so clearly he's not carrying any serious knock.

    4. Arteta
      • 8 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Yes and yes.

  17. Hazz
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 6 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    BREAKING - Reece James (still) injured (again)

    https://www.chelseafc.com/en/news/article/james-out-of-england-game

    ‘Reece James has withdrawn from the England squad and will not feature against Ukraine on Sunday.

    ‘The full-back has returned to Chelsea for assessment on an ongoing issue.

    ‘No replacements are planned as Gareth Southgate’s squad, including the suspended Luke Shaw, continue their preparations at Tottenham Hotspur Training Ground.’

    1. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      He's hilariously injury prone. A premium FPL troll.

      1. Hazz
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 6 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        He needs to get the surgery done he keeps putting off.

        1. The Mentaculus
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 2 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          Any idea if that'll happen now or at the end of the season?

          1. Hazz
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 6 Years
            1 year, 1 month ago

            No idea

    2. boc610
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      he's the new sicknote (after Darren Anderton whose still the OG)

    3. SAKA AND EMILE SMITH ROWE
      • 7 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Professional hospital patient, part-time footballer

    4. Arteta
      • 8 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Surely no one serious owns James at this point?

      1. The Mentaculus
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 2 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Haha, fair. I do but its a reckless gamble & not something I would have done if I weren't stuck with a 7 figure OR looking for any high-ceiling risk to take

  18. R.C
    • 6 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Christmas tree

  19. gart888
    • 9 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    What would you do with one transfer here? Plan has been to BB29 and FH32.

    Raya Kepa
    Trippier Botman Henry Estupinan Zinchenko
    Saka Martinelli Rashfor Mitoma Maddison
    Kane Watkins Toney

    Thinking Zinchenko to Shaw. Anything worth a hit? Was going to do Martinelli to Mac Allister, but not so sure without them doubling soon.

    1. gart888
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Doubling *again* soon.

  20. dunas_dog
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    If you have front 3 of Watkins Kane Havertz who are you losing to get Haaland in 30? Watkins home to NFO, Kane has decent run of fixtures as does Havertz

    1. gart888
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Tough call. Which is pretty much why I didn't use a transfer to bring in both of Watkins and Havertz.

      You go Havertz if you're not going to FH in 32.
      You go Kane if you think you can use the funds well in the rest of the team.
      Otherwise you go Watkins or Havertz based on which one you personally rate better.

  21. Van_de_Fart
    • 12 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Hi all, I have made around 3 transfers already, that's a 8 point hit. f I decided to use the FREE HIT CHIP now, will the previous transfers I made stay in my team permanently?

    1. CONNERS
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      No, your team will revert back to your GW28 team the following week.

    2. Freshy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      nope

    3. Wobbles
      • 3 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      No.
      But why have you made 3 transfers so early in the middle of an international break? There's still another whole week before the next round starts.

    4. The Polymath
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Nope FH will wipe them out.

  22. Magic Zico
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 5 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Which GW to BB? GW29 no brainer?

    A. GW29: Raya (bha mun) Henry (bha mun) Botman (MUN whu) Saka (LEI)

    B. GW34: Raya (NFO) Henry (NFO) Botman (SOU) Isak (SOU)

    1. CONNERS
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Yeah, A, although having double BRE defence isn't ideal imho.

      Could you get Shaw for Henry?

      1. Magic Zico
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 5 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Shaw in starting line up, Henry down to the bench

  23. gart888
    • 9 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    GW29 safer, but the 34 fixtures you have are straight up better than any of the ones in 29.

    Saka is vs. Leeds tho btw.

  24. Paqueta Rice
    • 3 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    BB could be in tatters. Rashford, Haaland and now James…

    1. CONNERS
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Rashford will almost certainly be fine.

      Wait for news on the other two and go from there.

    2. Fitzy.
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      You can always cancel it

      1. Arteta
        • 8 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Exactly.

      2. Paqueta Rice
        • 3 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Can do. A lot more international games to be played and most people own Haaland and Rashford so any more injuries and a lot of people will have to reconsider it.

  25. agueroooooney
    • 9 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Would you BB this?

    Steele (-4) - Saka - Odegaard - White

    Need to take a hit to get rid of Ward, doesn't look fantastic but I don't really see a better time. Also have Haaland and Rashford starting who are both flagged

    1. A Fat Spanish Waiter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Obviously, it’s still a waiting game, and if it turns out that Haaland and Rashford in the team, that’s a solid BB. You don’t really need double game week players on your bench… just good players that you would normally start, and certainly 3 Arsenal fit that bill well.

      Regarding Steele, I think if you can take out a player who is getting zero minutes for a player who is getting 2 games, that’s worth the hit all day. Will Steele get two games is the bigger question. Sanchez got a start in the cup, so it’s more uncertain now in my opinion.

      1. agueroooooney
        • 9 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        Thanks, that's sound logic. I might go for Iversen instead, he also plays in 32 (not really sure if I need the FH for then).

        Having FH, WC and BB all intact makes it tempting to delay the BB and go for WC33 BB34 or WC36 BB37 but I don't see myself having a better bench than that either way

  26. 1justlookin
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Do you think its a huge risk to go without Haaland in GW 30 & 31. MCI play Southampton away & Leicester at Home.
    My other forwards are

    Watkins NFO, NEW
    Kane BHA, BOU.
    Toney NEW, wol

    1. A Fat Spanish Waiter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I do think it’s a risk, yes. For me, I’ll be moving Toney back to Haaland in 30, if (and its a big if) he is passed fit. It’s definitely a wait and see situation at this point.

    2. The Mentaculus
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 2 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Yes. Not that it's necessarily a bad idea to take the risk if his fitness is still questionable, but those are soft fixtures & if he does start both you know what can happen.

      How long are you expecting to hold Toney with 9 YC & a hearing next month?

    3. agueroooooney
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Definitely a risk, but most decisions in this game are. He'd be in my team over any one of them if that answers your question.

    4. CONNERS
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I'm going without him in gw29, but he's straight back in the week after (if fit).

      I don't like captaincy options in gw30 and Haaland has the standout fixture (unless you risk going with Rashford in the early game).

  27. Wobbles
    • 3 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    If he's fit you would be crazy to go without him. Toney out is the sensible move

    1. Wobbles
      • 3 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Reply fail

  28. CONNERS
    • 5 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Has anyone looked ahead as far as GW34 in regards to what future transfers might be, and what your DGW34 team could look like?

    I'm provisionally aiming for something like the below.

    Raya
    Trippier - Dunk** - Shaw**
    Salah** - Bruno** - Rashford** - MacA** - Mitoma**
    Haaland** - Darwin**

    1. The Mentaculus
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 2 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Yeah I'll have a very similar team. My 4 FTs (FH32) could be: Toney - Haaland, Havertz - Darwin, Maddison - Salah, Saka - Foden/Bruno. Which would give:

      Raya
      Trippier Estupinan Shaw
      Salah Rashford March Mitoma Bruno/Foden
      Haaland Darwin

    2. CONNERS
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Yep, looks good.
      Foden could be a nice pick if he plays both games in the double.

    3. Øgaard it's Haa…
      • 1 Year
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Similar, but
      Ederson for Raya, Estupinan for Dunk
      Saka for Salah, KDB for MacA
      Ferguson for Darwin.

    4. House Frey Wedding Planner
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Contemplating going without Salah for now but is subject to change:

      De Gea
      TAA Estu Trippier Shaw
      Foden/Mahrez March Mitoma Rashford
      Haaland Darwin

      10dgw plus Trippier. Will only have to take a -4 to get this

  29. dunas_dog
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    Ødegaard to

    A Bruno F
    B Maddison

    1. dunas_dog
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      * Or C Salah

    2. agueroooooney
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      B or keep

    3. CONNERS
      • 5 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      I think Bruno is the best pick for the dgw29 and then Salah can come in a bit later as a Kane replacement in a 3-5-2.

  30. Shark Team
    • 6 Years
    1 year, 1 month ago

    What should I do in your opinion?
    Still having WC BB chips
    A) BB this gw with 12 doublers and a bench of Kepa(-4) Botman Gabriel Kane. So I will WC in DGW34.
    B) WC33 BB34 (starting Saka over Botman and Kane this gw)

    1. agueroooooney
      • 9 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      A

    2. Wobbles
      • 3 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      A all day long assuming you also have Haaland and Rashford and they are both fit

      1. Shark Team
        • 6 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        I dont have Haaland as im starting Kane Watkins but I believe Gabriel and Botman wont keep any clean sheets, Ward to Kepa for -4 may give me 0pts as well so its only Kane who's benching worries me if I go with plan B

    3. The Mentaculus
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 2 Years
      1 year, 1 month ago

      Have you tinkered with a BB34 team? It would help to see it. Looks a good BB29 but you could really go either way on this with WC available to set up BB34

      1. Shark Team
        • 6 Years
        1 year, 1 month ago

        I love the possible DGW36 for Newcastle, this makes me go triple Newcastle in my WC33 (Botman Trippier Isak) and BB with them in DGW34 along with 3x Mci,Mun,Liv and Bha

        1. Shark Team
          • 6 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          They face SOU(H) in 34

        2. The Mentaculus
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • Has Moderation Rights
          • 2 Years
          1 year, 1 month ago

          Yeah that sounds good actually. So, one fixture less for Botman, but a much safer CS fixture. Kane v Everton (A) I'm not exactly feeling excited about tbh so I think Isak with Southampton (H) could be about par. Trippier v Gabriel, I'd back Trippier. And then with Kepa requiring -4 any of the DGW34 GKs are probably ahead. So, its close, but I think I slightly prefer BB34 here

          1. Shark Team
            • 6 Years
            1 year, 1 month ago

            I know, thank you for taking time thinking about it. I think people told me to go for A as this is what they planned for their teams. I like the idea of BB29 without using WC only with a hit but i think I'll bet on a gw without clean sheets for New and Ars and risk with BB34, thanks mate