Community Submissions

Fantasy Premier League Top Tips

Over the last two seasons I’ve really started to knuckle down and try to improve my rank. In 2014/15 I broke my personal best with a rank of 12,015, followed by my best rank to date of 754 last season. So what exactly happened? What factors did I consider that influenced my decisions and helped improve my rank? Or was it all down to blind luck? I’ve listed below several factors and pieces of advice that I received on Fantasy Football Scout that might help others see a nice rank jump next year.

Players and Ownership

As someone pointed out a while back, you don’t necessarily need a team full of low owned differentials to soar up the ranks, quite the opposite in fact. For example if you have give players in your side that each have 30% or more ownership, the percentage of people that owns all of those five same players is actually 0.25%, which as a fraction is 1/400. With around 3.5m players in the game this works out at around 8,750 managers. So stocking up on popular players such as Sergio Aguero and Harry Kane can be a differential in itself.

Value Over Replacement Player (VORP)

This is a new concept on my radar and understanding it has really helped my FPL management. It is the idea that by looking at previous seasons, we can quantify our budget to see what points we need to be getting for every 0.5m of our 100m budget in order to reach the top 1000 in the overall rankings. So for example, let’s imagine Aguero scores 20 goals and Kane scores 15 goals over a given season. Using last year’s prices, Aguero (13.0m) might have scored more goals and points than Kane (9.5m), but we have to ask how much that 3.5m difference can be utilised elsewhere by owning Kane, and how many more points we expect Aguero to outscore Kane from that 3.5m throughout the season. For more on how it works please do read this article by community regular Ruth_NZ.

Critical Thinking and Focus

Psychology is another factor to consider and has been raised expertly by FFScout community regular Ludo in his article entitled The Psychology of Fantasy Football. As a former philosophy and psychology student, I was well aware of fallacies and bias, but never thought to consider that they might be a factor affecting my decision-making and choices in my FPL team. As a neutral, I owe no allegiance to a particular club but do like to fancy the underdog from time to time. For many  that do support a club, they may be influenced to triple up on their own team’s players, or to avoid putting in players from rival teams out of superstition in case they do well. Ludo lists out a number of biases and fallacies that we all fall victim to at one point or another over the season. I think it has helped a lot to notice when this is happening in order to approach the game as sensibly and logically as possible (even though at times our plans can fall apart).

Form Versus Fixtures

Last season, the argument about “form vs fixtures”  came to the fore when the fine form of teams such as Leicester, Watford and Bournemouth trumped their on-paper tough fixtures.

Ultimately most people will still side with one or the other; for me it is fixtures from the start of the season, and then adjust slowly as the whipping boys and title contenders reveal themselves as the season goes on. In a way, I think a hybrid approach might be the best thing to go by. For instance, one might look at the FFScout Season Ticker (see home page or sign up for Membership for the season long, interactive version) and see a player they want to bring in faces Man City. The “fixture” managers will likely be put off, and the “form” managers might be sceptical depending on the form of the player they want to bring in. But if, for example, Man City are conceding a lot, then there is a good case for bringing in a player, especially if he has strong underlying statistics indicating a goal is on the horizon (Members can see Jonty’s goals imminent table to see the latest potential goalscorer throughout the season).

Statistics Versus The Man In The Stands

Another popular debate is statistics versus man in the stands. At many times over the season you’ll come across a FFScout Members table advocating player X or player Y, based on strong statistics such as shots in the box or chances created. I must admit I do find comfort in picking a player by looking at his statistics to try justify my faith in him. However, there are times when the numbers are misleading and we can only get a true representation of a player by watching him play. As the saying goes, “there are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.” Sometimes a compressed compilation of highlights a la Match of the Day isn’t enough footage to see a player’s merits, which is why watching a full match or extended highlights can be invaluable (though for many with time constraints, unrealistic).

Statistics do play a role though and the best approach may be to combine analysing statistics with watching a player actually perform. A player may have many shots in the box, but if by watching him play you realise that all are weak then you get a far more accurate picture of his potential.

Preseason

Some people believe preseason shows us a lot, whereas others disregard it. It can be good, for example, highlighting players like Swansea’s one season wonder Michu, Bournemouth’s Callum Wilson and Watford’s 2015/16 sensation Odion Ighalo. Pre season can give FPL managers an edge in player selection from the start of the season and  also give an indication as to where players will play and whether they are likely to start or are on set pieces.  But at the same time, we can’t take too much from friendlies given the oppositions teams face as well as the strength of the squad that is put out. A player may only be on the pitch during a friendly as a deputy for another who is late back from international duty, for example.

Captaincy

A huge factor that I always seemed to struggle with is captaincy, whereby your player gets double points. Often sticking with one or two tried and tested candidates can be a good tactic, with Aguero and Kane good examples of investing in reliable goal scorers. But last season was unpredictable and often a plum home tie can deliver a blank, while a captaincy candidate’s biggest haul can come in an on-paper tricky away fixture. Generally though,  home teams do better so if it came down to a 50/50 split between two players I would favour the home option.

As mentioned with VORP, captaincy has to be taken into account. The likes of Aguero and Kane offer you that extra bit of security in getting above average scores. Especially with FPL’s Triple Captain chip which can boost the “effective ownership” of a popular player. Picking a poorly owned captain does have its advantages though, despite the risk, as they can help when chasing a lead. The risk is though that you may fall even further behind.

Luck Versus Skill

I’m a firm believer that the high majority of Fantasy management is luck. You can pick all of the ‘good’ players, but at the end of the day, they are the ones who have to go out and deliver. They might be sent off, they might blank, they might break a leg, they might score a hatrick. Who knows really? It might seem simple, but at the end of the day the best strategy is to maximise your chances of success and minimise your chances of failure.

How do we do this? The answer is through effective management of risk. If, say, luck accounts for 75% of the game and the other 25% is management, then that 25% is the difference between a stellar overall rank and a poor one. Plan ahead, but not too far ahead. When you start the game, don’t have the mentality of “in Gameweek 2 I will transfer X to Y” or “I will wildcard in Gameweek 4”. This can be a recipe for disaster as unexpected injuries and suspensions are all part of the game that crop up when we least expect them. As they say, ‘the best laid plans of mice and men often go awry’. But by planning for the unexpected and giving yourself some money left over in the bank in Gameweek 1 then you may be able to draft in an early season surprise sensation. Also with double Gameweeks these can be carefully managed to ensure that your wildcard and chips, such as Bench Boost, can be saved for these periods of the season. Such tactics can significantly reduce the reliance on luck in the game.

Final Thoughts

Above are just a few pieces of advice that I received over the last two years and have applied to my game. Hopefully the trend can continue in improving my rank, but the bar is certainly set high for next year. Please feel free to comment if you agree or disagree, or if you have any other advice that you feel is noteworthy for others. Good luck to all in the coming season and hopefully many more quality articles will appear from the community that will help others as they have helped me

Bøwstring The Carp Active since 2011 on FFS. Occasional poster and community article writer. Twitter: @MattKearney92 Follow them on Twitter

64 Comments Post a Comment
  1. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Great advice. I think anyone following that is almost certainly guaranteed a top 10K place at least.

    I'm a particular fan of the 'stocking up on high ownership players as a differential in itself' strategy.

    1. The_Colonel
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Is that the patented "dullard strategy"?

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        Yep.

        Although not my patent. Pioneered by Ville Ronka.

        1. The_Colonel
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 9 months ago

          And adopted by many 😉

    2. wachu
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      @Jonty, are you planning to make Pre-Season section as it was last year?

      1. J0E
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        Yep, all prepped and ready to go.

        1. wachu
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          7 years, 9 months ago

          🙂

    3. tets mcgee (Bachmann an Rob…
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      its not actually true though. if 5 players are owned by 30% then it does not follow that only .25% own all 5. imagine a scenario where it is the same 30% who own all 5. then the % remains at 30. the argument does not follow. sorry to be a pedant. as a statistician the best you can say is that the true figure lies in the parameters of 30% and 0%

  2. The_Colonel
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Nice piece Bowstring!

  3. Jazz!
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Wow, great article.

  4. Shearer & Sutton
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Nice article.

    1. Sillet Bang
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Here here

  5. Back on the horse
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Says 15 comments but I can only see 8

  6. Sillet Bang
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    I had a torrid time last year and enevitably got bored. Roll on 16/17

  7. melvinmbabazi
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Nice article

  8. thepopo
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    I've got to say I agree with the 75% luck part. I had a few torrid seasons (>100k) mixed in with several top 10ks. I played the same way each time. The only difference was luck (picking the right players at the wrong time, failed captains, horrific injury problems).

    I think it's something that is hugely underappreciated around here.

  9. Thomass
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    So on by this advice, what would you say would be the best gameweek to pull the trigger and Wildcard?

    1. Bøwstring The Carp
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Depends on the context.

      Some might be forced into it with injuries and suspensions. others might be holding on to it for a later stage near the Christmas fixture pileup or some will prefer to use it over the international breaks for building TV up.

      No real answer to that question, depends on each specific team

      1. Miss Thing
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        I love this sort of analysis. My observation would be that the best of luck happens with a good dose of planning. At the moment I'm fixated on matching Home/Away, CS and attacking statistics for the first 4 weeks. It brings up some interesting possible acquisition options. My opening strategy will be to increase team value in the short term, even though it's like lemmings to the cliff, and then settle down to the form and fixture analysis.

  10. Amateur Pundit Zan
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Not much I disagree with here.

    I've always been a big advocate of your first point. In 4 years of playing and posting with fairly template teams I have never seen an identical first 11 to mine.

    The others points are pretty much the sensible middle ground, looking at all factors and evidence, making sensible decisions with it then hoping your luck averages out or goes in your favour over a season.

    Top 1k and you are at worst luck neutral and probably had it in your favour overall.

  11. RedLightning
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    The 0.25% ownership of all five 30% players is only correct if their ownership is randomly distributed.
    The true figure could be anything from 0% to 30%.
    For example, if 10% follow the dullard strategy of owning all players with at least 20% ownership, then the ownership of all five will be at least 10%.
    Or if 60% of players want either Aguero or Ibrahimovic but cannot afford both, then the number owning both could be 0%.

    Also, are you talking about the overall ownership by all FPL managers including casuals and dead teams, or ownership by the top 10k (which might be skewed by early use of chips), or ownership by experienced veterans or players in the top 50 of our Hall of Fame?

    In my opinion, the best FPL managers like Ville Ronka probably don't just look at the current ownership, they also anticipate increases and decreases in ownership. In other words, they also look to the future and bring in players who are likely to score well in the next few weeks but have not yet been snapped up by the herd.
    So his strategy is probably to own a certain number of players with high ownerships, but also to include other players who may be currently less highly owned but who have excellent prospects.

    1. Bøwstring The Carp
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      I'd take the overall ownership in the early stages (i.e. when you hit info on the player and it shows his ownership), then move to a Top 10,000 ownership as you move up the table for a more realistic idea of what type of ownership percentages you are dealing with from those around you.

      Good point though, I was referring more to the likes of mid-price and premium players such as Sanchez, Aguero, Hazard, Silva , De Bruyne, Costa, etc that you might not necessarily be able to afford a lot of them.

      So the likelihood of someone owning 2 or 3 of them but not the others would be a lot closer to representing that random distribution model, but correct it's not a totally accurate representation when you take the other factors into account.

      Another way of putting it would be to consider the rest of the squad. You might have 5/6 highly-owned players (2 or 3 of which are premium players), so the other 9/10 show just how unlikely it is that someone will have the same team as you. In this case, your team can be seen as the differential factor rather than individual players.

      Definitely agree with the Ville Ronka point, I do the same myself. I would categorise these players under differentials, regardless of price that make up the rest of the squad. Like the percentage of Chelsea defenders might be high, yet owning Ivanovic (who might have a low ownership compared to Terry/Cahill/ Azpi) could give you a huge edge if his underlying stats/ fixtures suggest he is worth investing in. Obviously VORP comes into affect here too.

      1. RedLightning
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        I think it depends a lot on the prices of the highly owned players. If they are all expensive, then perhaps no-one will own all of them. But if they are mid-priced then the ownership of all of them, especially among the top ten thousand and others with a consistently strong FPL record is likely to much higher, especially in the latter part of the season.

        Perhaps the answer is to own most of them if they are affordable and do not unduly upset the balance of the rest of the squad, and then rely on the rest of the squad as your differential. But differentials do not have to be wild punts - they could just be players whose potential you have identified before the rest of the herd, or whose purchase you have timed better than others - or a strong combination of less highly owned players, which is most unlikely to be the same as anyone else's (except after everyone uses their second wildcard in the same game-week). And in some cases, as you say, it might be advantageous to own a Chelsea defender who is not the most popular one.

      2. RedLightning
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        The overall ownership in the first few game-weeks needs to taken with a pinch of salt.
        I entered a squad containing all the most highly owned players (the casuals template) in last season's Dead Team Challenge and it finished nearly last.
        I never expected it to do very well - for a start it contained at least one player who I knew was not a starter for his team.

        Ownership of players who are popular with the casuals because of their low prices and points last season is probably irrelevant, but perhaps high ownership of players new to the Premier League might be an indication that they are highly rated by other experienced FPL managers.

        There can also be a bandwagon effect of players being selected because of their high overall ownership, even though some of them do not really deserve it.

        There can also be an FFS Template that is different to the Casuals Template - last season for example Walcott was included in a ridiculous number of initial squads because of his popularity within FFS, and the number of FFS managers who therefore jumped on his bandwagon.

  12. Chenku╰☆╮
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Mark Rogers is such a tease.. Opening soon my foot!

    1. Irish Madridista ⭐
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Imminently soon..

  13. DeadStarComing
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Nice article. I actually avoid players from my own team (West Brom) to avoid double disappointment. Or it could just be they are West Brom players!

    Regarding the luck versus skill - I really do believe it's more skill than luck. Most managers are quite consistent from what I've seen with perhaps the odd super season/disaster season. I've been in a mini league with the same people for over 5 years now and we all generally finish around the same positions each season. Surely if it was mostly luck the positions we finish would be a lot more random.

  14. MonkeyButler
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Very much enjoyed this. After abandoning most of my strategy last year, I'm keen to return to the rule book and pay attention this year. The only other rule relates to time. The more you invest, the better you do (in my book). It really does pay to read up on as much as possible.

  15. Bøwstring The Carp
    • 12 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    As much as I like the thought of Pogba coming to the PL, it sickens me to think that £100m can be spent on a footballer's services when hunger and war still exist in the world 🙄

    1. Bøwstring The Carp
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Bah wrong section 😡

  16. HVT
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Good article Bow and speaking from experience (2 - 1.5k finishes and 1 - 700 finish) I apply a lot of what I've read to my game.
    One thing I'm not sure got mentioned are hits. Personally j tend to avoid unless absolutely necessary, I'd advise keeping them down 2-5 is enough in my book to keep a good healthy rank. I'm a rank junkie and by 'chasing' this you will inevitably do well in your minis and other leagues.

    1. Bøwstring The Carp
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Good point, was forgetting all about hits

      Yeah last season I tried to keep the numbers down too. Like you said, I think I only took about 4 or 5 (-4) hits over the whole season. There was 3 DGWs if I remember correctly and I think at the first two of these I took a -4, but then on the later one I took a -8 when Klopp decided to go on a rotation trip with Liverpool.

      Definitely something worth considering. I guess a hit in a DGW is fine since you have 2 matches to make it pay off, but you definitely have to factor in and subtract the score of the player you would be taking out in order to assess how well it paid off.

      I'm very reluctant to take a hit for a defender, as most times a clean sheet is their highest ceiling, by which those 4 points cancel out the -4 hit and make it a bit pointless if not risky most of the time.

      1. HVT
        • 13 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        The dgw is always the exception to the rule when it comes to hits.
        I too have a similar policy for def hits and avoid most of the time, tho if I were taking a (rare) hit for a def I factor in long term fixtures/form and imminent price rises these elements would certainly influence my thinking.
        Another point not mentioned I think is trying to roll Ft to 2, I find it most beneficial this way and would often contemplate a hit with these 2 moves, somewhat like a mini WC and can quickly reinvigorate a faltering team but to really nail this strategy you need some luck and good planning, last year was an excellent example of this, at times I struggled to use 1ft let alone 2ft as pricing allowed us a very good squad.
        Finally I do advise to try get off to as best a start as one can, planned transfers may need to be adjusted for the likes of Mahrez so get them in quick, I'm a firm believer in chasing the price rises as I really believe TV is another part of the game overlooked by some and for me normally results in that 1 better player (eg Antonio over 4.5 or Aguero over Costa) over rivals enablers, the early bird catches the worm for me and I'm not afraid to make that early Sat/Sun transfer and yake a chance.

    2. JK - Cønt ⭐
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Hits are something I say I hate but always end up taking. 2 years ago I think I took - 20 over a season. Last season it went to about - 32. Need to trim this back down again

  17. charliesam
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    "As someone pointed out a while back, you don’t necessarily need a team full of low owned differentials to soar up the ranks, quite the opposite in fact. For example if you have give players in your side that each have 30% or more ownership, the percentage of people that owns all of those five same players is actually 0.25%, which as a fraction is 1/400. With around 3.5m players in the game this works out at around 8,750 managers. So stocking up on popular players such as Sergio Aguero and Harry Kane can be a differential in itself"

    How on earth did someone "think" that if for example you have 5 players with lets say a 30% each ownership that only 0.25% of entrants could have that combo?

    That simply is not correct in my opinion.

    1. Ginkapo FPL
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      3/10 * 3/10 * 3/10 * 3/10 * 3/10 = 243/100,000 or about 1/412

      Do you not even Maths Bro?

      1. charliesam
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        Oh I know maths alright, that's why I posted. I just need to find a simpler way to explain to someone like you why the logic is rubbish. Your reply has no logic by the way.

        Because to make it simple for you (because it needs to be I think):

        What if 30% of entrants picked the same 5 players?

        Over to you Mr Einstein lol.

        1. Ginkapo FPL
          • 12 Years
          7 years, 9 months ago

          What if 30% of entrants picked the same 5 players?

          Well then the players wouldnt be sitting at 30% ownership as you are suggesting that 30% of entrants would take exclusive rights over those 5 players.

          Unless you have a reason to believe that natural distribution doesnt apply in this case, then it is the default option. I do think there is a case that there are a large portion of the player base which should be ignored, namely the dead teams and those at the low ranks. However, this would merely increase the percentage of players with all 5 players from 0.25% to closer to 0.5%.

          Are you concerned about the difference between 0.25% and 0.5%? As this is the argument you are making.

          Quick hint: dont claim my post has no logic, then come back later and define the logical position my post has taken. It makes it look very strongly like you dont know what you are talking about.

      2. charliesam
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        What you are calculating GINKAPO is whats called random distribution, you are probably more of a bingo player that a fantasy football player, me thinks.

        1. Bøwstring The Carp
          • 12 Years
          7 years, 9 months ago

          As I said elsewhere, we're talking about a pool of premium players in the 9m+ region that will likely have high ownership (not specifically 30%, but let's say 15% or higher ownership)

          The likes of Silva, KDB, Fabregas, Sanchez, Ozil, Hazard, Alli, Eriksen, Mkhitaryan, Martial, Firmino, Mane, Coutinho, Mahrez, Vardy, Payet, Lukaku, Costa, Zlatan, Sturridge, Giroud, Kane, Aguero.

          You might only be able to afford 3/23 or 4/23 of these players. When you take into account these possible combinations and the rest of your team, you can see how unlikely it is for someone to have the same team as you.

          But yes, definitely last year the range was a lot more uncertain between 0% and 30% with easily affordable popular players like Mahrez, Vardy and Alli. It was a very unpredictable season and I hate to use it in examples as I believe it was a one-off.

          This year, with things hopefully getting back on track, with regards to pricing and the form of teams like Liverpool, Chelsea and United. This should be a lot more spread out (I hope)

          1. Ginkapo FPL
            • 12 Years
            7 years, 9 months ago

            All true.

            He hasnt elequented it, but there is an issue with your statistics. You assume that the full player base might purchase these players. The reality is that 30% ownership is likely to be closer to 60% ownership amongst half the playerbase. This equates to 7.7% of players sharing the 5 players.

            1. Bøwstring The Carp
              • 12 Years
              7 years, 9 months ago

              True, especially when you take Top 10,000 ownership once you get into the rank area.

              Maths/ probability was never my strong point anyway 😆

            2. charliesam
              • 14 Years
              7 years, 9 months ago

              GINKAPO, can you please tell me what part of 30% ownership you don't understand.

              You wrote the following and still wonder why I think your point has no logic !

              "The reality is that 30% ownership is likely to be closer to 60% ownership amongst half the playerbase. This equates to 7.7% of players sharing the 5 players"

  18. Jafalad
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    A very nice article, Bowers. Thank you for it.

    Some points and observations.

    It's nice to see someone else pointing out the dangers of "emotional" investment of players or even, teams. You have to keep your emotions out of it.

    Does luck play a part? Hell yes. This is often overlooked and it is why some playing the game need to allow for. No point beating yourself up over it although I've found it very hard to forgive Chris Smalling for his own goal in week 38 last season and costing me a place in the top 10k.

    VORP - well worth some investigation although I can think it's fair to say that last season had minimal effect given the high number of budget players scoring so well and the lack of expensive players failing to perform.

    The Captaincy - when I analysed my performance last season (finished 11k) I discovered that the main difference was the captain's armband. If I had put the armband on Mahrez more often and trusted his form, what a significant difference it would have made in rank. If there is one thing I am looking to change this year, this is it. Those double points can make or break a season.

    One thing I would add is my golden rule of FF: Pick Players That Play. It seems perfectly obvious and common sense but it astonishes me every year to see so many risk selecting players that are injury prone, under rotational threat, etc, etc. For those with low ranks, I see this as the no 1 reason as to why so many fail at ff.

    Thank you for your articles over the summer and the very best of luck for 2016/7.

    1. JK - Cønt ⭐
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      All excellent points. That last one is crucial imo. Last year I avoided all the 4.0 defenders as none were nailed. This year I may go for 3 big defenders and 2 playing cheapies to cover injuries as defence is the area I bench the most points in

      1. Jafalad
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 9 months ago

        Good luck this season,young Weasel! 🙂

        1. JK - Cønt ⭐
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          7 years, 9 months ago

          Thank you sir

  19. Clump
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Great work Bowstring. I've not been on here during the closed season, this is a welcome refresher.

  20. Michael Gary Scott
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Enjoyed the article! Gives me reflection value over a few things more than new knowledge, but just as important, thanks! Specially interesting about the VORP-theory, but think it's "easier said than done" with a lot of rivals often captaining the player I risk not having. Also I think it's important to plan ahead, though I do agree with you about not getting "locked" to one plan, flexibility.

  21. Mollart
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    If you want in on a high quality, high rewards money league. Follow me on Twitter : @ellisiantheory or email me : joellis34@gmail.com

    Competitive but lots of fun. Just £20 entry, over 2k in prize pot last season

    1. Mílanista
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 9 months ago

      Do you have a low quality, high rewards mini league?

  22. John t penguin
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    You want to research a study called the Bullard box

  23. penguinsofdeath
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Very good article, I'll no doubt re-read this before the season to keep these thoughts top of mind. I had my best season in 2014/15 (top 3k) but followed it up last year with a big drop down to 45k ish. Can't really put my finger on why, things just didn't seem to go right for me - I had a bad start and never really recovered properly and then messed up my chips towards the end of the season. I've definitely learnt lessons from it that I can work on this season as I aim for my first top 1k finish!

    I'd be interested to hear everyone's thoughts on the chips with the season to look back on. Is holding on to them for doubles still the way to go or are you tempted to triple captain a form striker when the tables bottom team come to town?

  24. schlupptheweek
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Bet on Mickelson to win the Open @40/1. Wish I'd done him FRL but atleast got him e/w

  25. Ruffio
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Hi guys
    Loving the advice
    Any chance of a pre season fantasy football scoutcast?
    Cheers
    Matt

  26. plance
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 9 months ago

    Please Join my fantasy team so we have fan. EPL - PLANCE OR 85058-86506