Community
7 October 2016 22 comments
Spreadsheet Spreadsheet
Share:

Prompted by Jonty’s hot topic on the Fantasy Premier League’s bonus point magnets so far I thought it worth looking at their allocation in more detail to establish who the baseline bonus point stars are so far. 

Baseline BPS Explained

Baseline bonus takes a closer look at FPL’s Bonus Point System, which gives points to key player attributes and is used to allocate bonus points. By stripping out the more obvious criteria such as goals, assists and clean sheets this leaves a baseline of underlying statistics that add to a players’ BPS score. More information about bonus allocation can be found in the  FPL rules.

Here’s a recap of the positive attributes that contribute to a good baseline BPS score:

  • Successful crosses
  • Creating a big chance
  • Clearances, blocks, interceptions (CBIs)
  • Recoveries
  • Tackles
  • Dribbles
  • Pass completion

and the negative things:

  • Conceding a penalty
  • Missing a big chance
  • Making an error which leads to a goal (or attempts on goal)
  • Being tackled
  • Conceding a foul
  • Being offside
  • Shots off target

Essentially, being a ‘tidy’ player that is not prone to mistakes and is good at a variety of skills will increase the chances of getting bonus points. This has historically given certain players a high chance of getting points if they do something else good in the game, such as score, as well as if the game is a 0-0 bore draw.

For example Ashley Williams at Swansea always hit very high CBIs and could be confident of getting at least 2 bonus if he also got a cleansheet.

When Yaya Toure scored a goal it was usually worth at least one bonus point due to his high pass rates and overall contribution.

What is interesting is to find if there are any other players that are likely to gain these bonus points with any regularity. The best way, I think, to do this is to try to determine Baseline BPS (bBPS) by looking at players BPS from each week, and removing those BPS awarded for goals, assists, saves and cleansheets (i.e. those things that directly gain a player points anyway).

I’ve left in cards and own goals, despite them having an immediate link to FPL points, because I didn’t originally build the spreadsheet to take account of them.

2016/2017 so far

Obviously we’re only seven Gameweeks in, so still a pretty small sample size, so we must take everything with an appropriate amount of salt.

Ranking in terms of regular BPS, we can see high scores for:

  1. Kevin De Bruyne – 199
  2. James Milner – 193
  3. Daley Blind – 178
  4. Diego Costa – 173
  5. Laurent Koscielny – 172
  6. Etienne Capoue – 166
  7. Kyle Walker – 165
  8. Phillippe Coutinho – 164
  9. Christian Fuchs – 161
  10. Adam Lallana – 160

I fully expect Milner, Costa, Capoue and Coutinho to drop off of that list once we remove their goals from the calculations. The others may stay as they have a more rounded game. But let’s see…

So for every goal they score, we remove the relevant points (24 for forwards, 18 for midfielders, 12 for defenders. For every assist we remove 9 points. Etc etc etc.

Then we are left with the following “baseline BPS” scores:

  1. Idissa Gueye (Everton) – 142
  2. Daley Blind (Man Utd) – 136
  3. Eric Bailly (Man Utd) – 135
  4. Lukasz Fabianski (Swansea) – 131
  5. Curtis Davies (Hull) – 128
  6. Antonio Barragan (Middlesbrough) – 122
  7. Tom Heaton (Burnley) – 120
  8. Nacho Monreal (Arsenal) – 120
  9. Artur Boruc (Bournemouth) – 119
  10. Sam Clucas (Hull) – 119

A few unfamiliar names in that list! So how far did our previous top 10 drop?

  1. Kevin De Bruyne – 109 (23rd)
  2. James Milner – 112 (joint 16th)
  3. Daley Blind – 136 (2nd)
  4. Diego Costa – 11 (312th)
  5. Laurent Koscielny – 112 (joint 16th)
  6. Etienne Capoue – 85 (78th)
  7. Kyle Walker – 99 (51st)
  8. Phillippe Coutinho – 83 (84th)
  9. Christian Fuchs – 116 (13th)
  10. Adam Lallana – 79 (101st)

So obvious Daley Blind is looking pretty good. As for the others, not so much. Costa, somewhat unsurprisingly, is absolutely hammered in bBPS.

If Jose Mourinho can start getting Manchester United some clean sheets, then we can certainly expect Blind and Bailly to be getting bonus. Meanwhile, it is worth noting that Antonio Valencia is 14th in the list with 114 bBPS.

Low Minute Baseline Kings

What about if we take minutes into account? Any players out there with great baseline stats, but not enough involvement, that we should keep an eye on?

Limited to players that have played at least 180 minutes of the campaign so far, let’s take bBPS and divide per minutes played then we can multiply up to see what they might have scored if they’d played all game every game. The results are like this:

  1. Lee Chung-yong (Crystal Palace) – seems to have lost his place, but could have been on 176 bBPS
  2. Daley Blind (Man Utd) – could have been even higher on 158
  3. David Marshall (Hull) – started very strongly so far, could have been on 154
  4. Claudio Bravo (Man City) – despite high profile mistakes, his bBPS are great and could have been on 152
  5. Idrissa Gueye (Everton) – has played almost every minute and has a great all around game. Could have been slightly higher on 144
  6. Eldin Jakupovic (Hull) – obviously been a Hull keeper gives you high bBPS, could have been on 142
  7. Jordan Pickford (Sunderland) – good metric for budget keepers apparently, could have been on 140
  8. Shkodran Mustafi (Arsenal) – may well be able to convert this into bonus at some point, could have been on 140
  9. Nicolas Otamendi (Man City) – seems to have made the position his own, and could have been on 139 bBPS.
  10. David Luiz (Chelsea) – played 90 minutes for the last 3 games, could have been on 135 if he’d been there all season.

Conclusion

  • If they get the hang of cleansheets, expect bonus for Hull defenders and keepers. We’ve seen high bBPS for Curtis Davies, plus high bBPS per minute for both Jakupovic and Marshall in goals.
  • By and large, the bBPS seems to favour defenders over attackers – very few mentions of anyone that you’d expect to be scoring goals. It is mostly CBs rather than FBs that dominate.
  • Daley Blind is scoring very highly in both BPS and bBPS and is probably the stand-out name from this analysis.
  • Idrissa Gueye is another, but is unlikely to convert it into many points. He was 17th in the full BPS list with 151, and could well be worth a look, but probably needs to add more assists to his game to get much FPL love.

Spreadsheet Built a spreadsheet for fantasy football. Got a bit out of hand now.

22 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    thanks for this. Really useful extra information following my hot topic.

    Also great to see Blind there.

    1. FPL Virgin
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Interesting to see Marshall on here. 0.1% ownership.

      1. NIGHTHIKER - I Kane, I Shaw…
        • 11 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Could be a wildcard option, but sticking with Foster for now.

  2. Freddie Cutecat
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Interesting read and analysis

    Thanks for your good work

  3. Costa's Counsellor
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Good stuff.

    p.s. Shots on target isn't really a negative is it?

    1. Spreadsheet
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Shots *off* target is the negative

      1. Costa's Counsellor
        • 10 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        Is shots on target a positive?

        1. Spreadsheet
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          9 years, 2 months ago

          Apparently not. So a shoot on sight policy (e.g. Coutinho) isn't good for BPS. But with a goal for a midfielder being worth 18 points and a shot off target being -1, the balance isn't bad for Coutinho's long range efforts!

  4. Pap Le Cissier
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Interesting read that might alter a couple of future transfer targets. Thanks

    Jordan Pickfords club needs changing though

  5. Freddie Cutecat
    • 9 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    I wonder, seeing as how much defenders dominate the bBPS when attacking points (assists/goals) are removed, if it would also be worth looking into removing BPS for clean sheets- since this is the principle way defenders/keepers get bps in the same way that the principle way attacking players get BPS is via assists and goals

    This metric could be what is skewing defenders further up the table- or at least contributing to it

    Just a thought, but love your work

    1. Spreadsheet
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      I have done exactly that in the analysis 🙂 I've removed BPS relating to goals, assists, and cleansheets. I've not removed BPS relating to saves apparently, though I thought I had, so that might lead to a very slight skew in favour of keepers?

      1. Freddie Cutecat
        • 9 Years
        9 years, 2 months ago

        My apologies, I must have missed that

        Interesting that Blind is still so high

  6. The Fantastic Mr Fox
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    I think Bravo and Jakupovic could be having a higher than expected placement in the last table bcos they saved a penalty each.

    1. Spreadsheet
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      Definitely will help, though it's not done Given or Mignolet many favours (23rd and 57th respectively in the bBPS/minutes table). So definitely a factor, but not one that should be discounted - especially with penalties being given out quite often, if there's any hope for the keeper saving them then that's great! But because it's so rare in general, I've never asked my spreadsheet to take them into account.

  7. Webbinho
    • 15 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Is there a way of extracting data from the fpl site? Or a site that holds such data? I run an auction type game based on the fpl scores, so knowing a way to extract the weekly scores rather than type them out myself would save me a while and eliminate data entry errors. Any advice be appreciated.

    Cheers

    1. Spreadsheet
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      The FPL overlord site has your answers. In the 'about' section you can download a CSV. I'm loathe to link the site itself, not certain of the rules. But google "FPL Overlord" and you'll find it.

  8. Clump
    • 10 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Interesting stuff, thanks.

  9. RubeRx
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Excellent analysis and contribution

    Wish I knew the author to thank him

    1. Spreadsheet
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      9 years, 2 months ago

      The author reads the comments 🙂

  10. Koolswan
    • 11 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Thank you for this interesting article. I have DDG so not sure about Blind. Also Will Blind keep his place?

  11. Gregor
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 16 Years
    9 years, 2 months ago

    Milner still did alright then.

  12. Dino
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    9 years, 1 month ago

    Excellent piece of work, thanks for sharing.

    You could possibly extend this to home away bBPS or even bBPS v top 6 teams and the rest if you wanted to allow people to plan for rotating their players based on fixtures? Not sure how much work this would entail but I would think the fixture difficulty plays a big part in bBPS for players.