Community

Magnificent Seven Captaincy Theory Revisited For Gameweek 9

Leading up to Gameweek 8, I investigated a theory proposed by user Net Gains that claimed to be able to find the best Fantasy captains.

The outcome of the analysis for Gameweek 8 was to captain Diego Costa, and anyone who had done so would have been quite pleased with the resulting nine Fantasy Premier League  points he took from the visit of Leicester to Stamford Bridge (I know I was).

It also shone a light on the form of West Brom’s Nacer Chadli, who managed a double digit haul of points against his old club.

Obviously it might just have been coincidence that it was an effective result, but with the calculations already in my spreadsheet it’s straightforward to perform the same exercise for upcoming Gameweek 9.

As a recap, the theory is to find the attacking player that does the best across seven equally weighted categories:

  • Points per minute (PPM)
  • PPM @ Venue
  • PPM @ Venue for last three games
  • % involvement in team goals (incl. assists)
  • Team goals scored @ venue for last three games
  • Opposition goals conceded @ venue for last three games
  • Count of unblanked games

As per the original theory, the winner of each category gets one point and second place gets nothing. The results are as follows:

  • PP90M = Heung-Min Son (8.33)
  • PP90M @ Venue = Heung-Min Son (13.57)
  • PP90M @ VenueX3 = Heung-Min Son (13.57)
  • % Involvement = Jermain Defoe (44%)
  • Team goals scored @ VenueX3 = Liverpool players (3)
  • Opposition goals conceded @ VenueX3 = Sunderland players at home – facing West Ham (2.66)
  • Unblanked games = Diego Costa (7)

Note that points are based on ‘GABS’ points (does not include minutes, cards, own goals, missed penalties etc. Only Goals/Assists/Bonus/Saves/Cleansheets are counted) and only Goals/Assists/Bonus are being checked for the ‘unblanked’ games.

One of the most noticeable things, compared to last week, is that things haven’t really changed a lot. That is a possible concern with this method – it will be relatively slow to react.

The other is that Heung-Min Son is the clear winner by virtue of his powerful PP90 score, especially away from home (where all four of his league goals have come to date).

Second place this week is Jermain Defoe thanks to his high level involvement in all things Sunderland attack, facing a West Ham defence that has really struggled this season.

GAMEWEEK 9’S TOP PICKS

The alternative method I proposed last week was to be less clear cut, and give the runners up a fraction of a point, based on how close they were to 1st place. Running that again this week gives the following top 10:

  1. Heung-Min Son (4.84)
  2. Junior Stanislas (4.45)
  3. Theo Walcott (4.17)
  4. Diego Costa (4.06)
  5. Adam Lallana (4.06)
  6. Alexis Sanchez (4.00)
  7. Raheem Sterling (3.83)
  8. Philippe Coutinho (3.72)
  9. Kevin De Bruyne (3.66)
  10. James Milner (3.64)

One other change to note here is that I have adjusted the ‘unblank’ assessment to take account of ‘opportunities’. So rather than giving Costa an initial count of seven for his unblanks, he has a result of seven out of eight, i.e. 87.5%. The main beneficiary of this is 21-year-old Sam McQueen who got an assist on his debut, giving him an ‘unblank’ record of 100%!

FINAL THOUGHTS

The original ‘Net Gains’ method of captaincy worked well last week, and could easily do so again. Bournemouth’s defence at home has done a very respectable job so far this season, but can they hold out Heung-Min Son this week? And in direct opposition is Junior Stanislas, who I’ve already discussed in an article recently. I would certainly pick the former over the latter, although my alternative method does not see much difference between the two. If either manage of these midfielders, or Jermain Defoe manage to pick up results in Gameweek 9, then this theory could yet have validity.

Other elements that surprised me while running this analysis is how poor the West Ham defence has been, though I’d be surprised to see the Sunderland team run riot.

And finally, two budget players that did not make it into the top 10 worth a mention – I had barely even noticed Sam McQueen arrive on the scene as yet another budget midfielder for possible consideration (although in reverse OOP, so sustained returns appear unlikely).

Also Joe Allen is up to a remarkable 40% involvement with Stoke’s goals, which with a visit to struggling Hull, supports the recent trend of transfers.

Spreadsheet Built a spreadsheet for fantasy football. Got a bit out of hand now.

28 Comments Post a Comment
  1. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 6 months ago

    Just to say there was mention in here of Sunderland playing at home which I edited out as they are away to WHU. Not sure if that alters the results. I leave it to Spreadsheet to let you all know if it does and post up any new figures.

    1. Spreadsheet
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 6 months ago

      Probably just bad typing on my part. The spreadsheet has all the fixtures in from the official site. But I'm away for the weekend, so can't double check...

  2. kiadmp
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 6 months ago

    I'm torn between Son and Walcott. Theo is more in form recently, but I think I'm gonna take a gamble on this theory and go for Son.

  3. Daywalker
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    7 years, 6 months ago

    Thinking of ditching Sterling. Coutinho or Lallana in?

  4. The Cisco Kid
    • 12 Years
    7 years, 6 months ago

    I love the article and the analysis. My one concern is PP90. Son's PP90 gets artificially inflated from his substitute appearance. Do his numbers look as good if they reflected the negative effect of only playing 19 minutes (as opposed to the 4.74 that his 1 point for 19 minutes suggests)?

    1. Spreadsheet
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 6 months ago

      I don't give any points for minutes played, so 19 minutes without attacking returns works against him.

  5. nub
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 6 months ago

    my captaincy band for gw 9 is on Kun. other options are walcott, son, firminho, ibra n lukaku.....pls advise me

    1. Koolswan
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 6 months ago

      Go with your gut or else as Spreadsheet suggests...go for Son.

  6. Koolswan
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 6 months ago

    Very interesting article.
    Son,if he gets a couple will be a great differential especially for people who are catching up. Let's hope it works.

  7. The Fantastic Mr Fox
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 6 months ago

    I looked at this last week and one of my lower ranked players (ozil) ended up being the best scorer.
    Sterling, firmino blanked. Even Payet did. Although i don't own him, his numbers were incredible

  8. Swedish Rs Mafia
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 6 months ago

    Come back with confidence intervals, after at least one full season worth of stats checking the theory. Otherwise, I trust "go with your gut" or even "check the bookies". 🙂

  9. vibhav747
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 6 months ago

    I might have a model of myself. can anyone help me with the data.

    1. KDF
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 5 months ago

      I would be willing to help with this.

  10. 1966 was a great year for E…
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 6 months ago

    Lol.

    This is just 'who's done well recently?'

    Junior Stanislas?!

    1. Spreadsheet
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 6 months ago

      Yes, it is largely that. Which is what a lot of people consider to be 'form' and I think that plays a fairly big role in most people's fantasy assessments.

      1. FPL Virgin
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 6 months ago

        Spreadsheet! Hello!

        Big fan 🙂

        1. Spreadsheet
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 5 months ago

          Hi there. That's nice to hear, I appreciate it.

      2. Ruth_NZ
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 6 months ago

        Yep. Of course in the real world it doesn't constitute "form" at all. 😕

        I have only been a regular on FFS for 2 years but even in that time I have seen an increasing tendency towards what used to be called "points-chasing".

        I prefer something more considered myself but that doesn't always lead to good decisions either. Vardy scored in 11 consecutive games last season (I think) without ever getting near my team. And this season I have Bony, from whom any goal at all looks unlikely.

        1. Spreadsheet
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 5 months ago

          Well, in defence of this theory (which is not my own, I just decided to investigate it - I don't honestly care if it works or not) it does attempt to take into account more than just 'who has the most points'. It's using form, fixtures and involvment to find a player that is unlikely to blank - although it has failed pretty shockingly this week.

  11. AllGonePozzo
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 6 months ago

    Anyone have link to original post? Captained Walcott this week yet with my squad this system pointed to Sterling. Awaiting hat full of points for Sterling this afternoon to compound my error. Not that would be a bad thing but would give me that might have been feeling

  12. RamaJama
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 6 months ago

    See Butland is expected back at 11th November. That means only 2 more games for Grant.

    Still worth transferring in?

  13. Yankee Toffee
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 5 months ago

    Ironically, of the 10 picks, only 8. Philippe Coutinho (3.72) got any points. Maybe a readjustment is necessary.

    1. Eden Hazardous
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 5 months ago

      nahhhhhh

      PPG >>>>>>

      Lol

    2. Bggz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 5 months ago

      not ironic in the least, unless youre allanis morriesette, just wrong.

      70% of the weighting is for results or scoring at the 'Venue' which is waaaaaaaaay too much for me.

      1. Get up ya bum
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 5 months ago

        Morissette's use or the word ironic is so ironic. Meta irony. Intentional? Hmmm. Naaa.

  14. Get up ya bum
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 5 months ago

    This stuff is bonkers. The game is actually way more simple. This sort of approach to it only makes sense to me if you don't like/follow/understand football at all, in which case you wouldn't be playing a fantasy football game.

    1. Get up ya bum
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 5 months ago

      I saw above this isn't your "theory" and I presume you just enjoy the mechanics of analysing it. Which is cool. I just don't see any value in this stuff.

    2. AK ⭐
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 5 months ago

      Pretty much, Champ. PPG has really failed in the last 2 weeks as well.