Community

The Magnificent Seven Captaincy Theory

Intrigued by a recent Hot Topic from Net Gains outlining a captain strategy, I decided to take a closer look at the best way to assess candidates for the armband.

The majority of the data was close to hand anyway, it was just a matter of teasing it out (and giving a few tweaks to minimise my workload).

The Magnificent Seven Captaincy Theory

As a recap, the theory was to find the attacking player that does the best across seven equally weighted categories:

  • Points per minute (PPM)
  • PPM @ Fixture
  • PPM @ Fixture for last three games (i.e. if next game is at home, PPM from last three home games)
  • % involvement in team goals (incl. assists)
  • Team goals scored @ relevant fixture for last three games
  • Opposition goals conceded @ relevant fixture for last three games
  • Count of unblanked games (i.e. games where the player got Goals/Assists/Bonus points)

Some considerations/tweaks:

  1. We are only considering attacking players so defenders are out.
  2. I much prefer to multiply PPM by 90 to get more normal looking numbers. Sergio Aguero for instance gets 0.066 PPM, which can be multiplied up to give 5.95 PP90M.
  3. When considering PPM or PP90M, I only count ‘GAB’ points – those from Goals/Assists/Bonus. I find including minutes/cards/own goals to detract from the overall picture.
  4. To make this interesting for people other than myself, I want to expand beyond just looking at my own eight attackers, and instead look at all the possible captains.

NET GAINS METHOD

The challenge is in this last point. If we stick purely with the rules as set out by Net Gains, then the winner of each category is as follows:

  • PP90M = Heung-Min Son (8.77)
  • PP90M @ Venue = Nacer Chadli (23.1)
  • PP90M @ VenueX3 = Nacer Chadli (23.1)
  • % Involvement = Jermain Defoe (44%)
  • Team goals scored @ VenueX3 = Liverpool/City players (3)
  • Opposition goals conceded @ VenueX3 = Chelsea players – facing Leicester (3.33)
  • Unblanked games = Diego Costa (6)

Therefore Net Gains’ system picks out Chadli and Costa as the winner of two categories each. Chadli has eight GAB points from the last two weeks, Costa has 10, so Costa is the pick. In joint third place are Son, Defoe and all the Liverpool/City attackers.

AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD

An alternative method is to be less clear-cut than Net Gains had suggested (winner of each category is the only player to score a point). To get around this, for each category I have divided the players score by the maximum score in that category. Therefore the ‘winner’ of each category gets one point, and everyone else gets somewhere between 0 and 1 depending on how close they are to the maximum score.

For example, Heung-Min Son got the highest PP90M score of 8.77, so he gets one point. Nacer Chadli is in second place, with 7.06 PP90M. 7.06 divided by 8.77 equals 0.81, so Chadli gets 0.81 points for the PP90M category.

So having done this, we can give all candidates a score between 0 and seven. If a player was top in every category he would get the full seven points.

Gameweek 8’s Top Picks

The top 10 scorers with this method are as follows:

  1. Nacer Chadli – 4.60
  2. Heung-Min Son – 4.59
  3. Diego Costa – 4.34
  4. Philippe Coutinho – 4.01
  5. Raheem Sterling – 3.87
  6. Adam Lallana – 3.81
  7. Kevin De Bruyne – 3.80
  8. James Milner – 3.71
  9. Alexis Sanchez – 3.41
  10. Jermain Defoe – 3.40

So once again, Chadli is listed as top scorer. At this point I feel obliged to pour an ocean of salt onto the exercise – Nacer Chadli’s next game is at home (to Spurs), and he has only played one game at home so far, so essentially is being expected to continue to get two goals and two assists every home match, which obviously will not happen. This is the curse of the small sample size unfortunately. There are ways to mitigate this, such as not being as focussed on the fixture venue, though even then Chadli’s total PP90M is second in the rankings, so his strong performances in limited minutes really skews the outcome in his favour. Certainly he may be worth a look, and at just 2.8% ownership, he could be a great differential. Though his fixtures do look horrendous.

An additional pile of salt comes from the fact that the last three home games is the same (at this stage of the season) as the total home games. So a good result in that category is essentially being doubled, when I personally would not be inclined to consider returns from the specific home/away venue to be as crucial a factor. As the season goes on, this will be minimised.

What about the big names that did not make the top 10? The three most owned players all missed the cut, as did a few other high ownership players that you may have expected (or hoped) to feature:

  • Zlatan Ibrahimovic – 2.61 (28th overall)
  • Sergio Aguero – 3.01 (21st overall)
  • Etienne Capoue – 3.36 (11th overall)
  • Romelu Lukaku – 3.07 (18th overall)
  • Eden Hazard – 3.34 (12th overall)
  • Michail Antonio – 3.02 (20th overall)
  • Sadio Mane – 3.20 (15th overall)
  • Dimitri Payet – 3.16 (16th overall)
  • Roberto Firmino – 3.29 (14th overall)

CONCLUSION

Nacer Chadli has great PPM, and ridiculous PPM at home. He’s got a good involvement in his team’s goals, and his team scores a respectable amount (1.66 per game for the last 3). So it’s understandable that he’s tipped strongly. But I don’t believe that all these categories should be considered equal, and I won’t captain him myself (not just because he’s not in my team). Heung-Min Son‘s stellar away record should be considered despite facing a Pulis team. Diego Costa has gone up in my estimation, with returns in six matches and facing a Leicester team with a poor defensive record away from home – a factor I was previously unaware of. So all three players highlighted by the Net Gains theory are well worth a closer look – I do think there may be some merit in this, though I’m sure more improvements can be made.

Further Statistics

For a closer look at the statistics click here.

Spreadsheet Built a spreadsheet for fantasy football. Got a bit out of hand now.

34 Comments Post a Comment
  1. J0E
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Brilliant thanks for this. Even with four cards I'm still regretting dumping Costa a few gwks ago. Looks a genuine good pick this week for the armband.

  2. Christina.
    • 14 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Leic poor away record and all these possible injuries are making me rethink the sale of Hazard.

  3. PvA
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Fella, don't talk about gains, talk about net gains

  4. Ziro
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    So now we are replacing the thrill of picking a captain with the mundane chore of inputting scores into an algorithm to spit out a name?

    1. COYS Down Under
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Not a fan of it to be honest. Somebody should run the numbers on it vs most captained player.

    2. Spreadsheet
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Essentially, yes that is what Net Gains is suggesting. I originally set up my spreadsheet to do essentially this - mine is designed to replicate everything that I try to consider when looking at my transfers/substitutes/captains. It becomes quite complex, all the different factors. The thrill for me is trying to define the algorithm - which factors do I think are most important? Recent form? How much? Upcoming fixtures? Does the venue matter? Am I willing to take a risk based on minutes played? Previous history against this team? Or from this time of the year? Value for money? Consistency vs explosivity?

      How do you prefer to make your decisions? Do you consider stats? Or is it pure 'gut feel'? Or somewhere in between?

      1. Ziro
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        A bit of stats, gut feel, fixtures, form.

        Gut feel has a weightage of 99% in that formulae though. 😉

  5. King Klopp
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    What are the chances of Sterling Lallana Lukaku and Aguero starting?

    1. COYS Down Under
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      90.08%

      1. King Klopp
        • 7 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        For all of them individually or as a group?

  6. michudagawd
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Chadli up against his former club so could be a great differential captain punt.

    1. COYS Down Under
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Owning him is the differential

  7. COYS Down Under
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Defoe has more than 44% involvement. Sunderland have scored 6 goals and Defoe has 4. That's 66%.

    1. Spreadsheet
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Net Gains' definition of 'goal involvement' includes assists - so there are 9 bites at the cherry available (6 goals + 3 assists), of which Defoe has 4 goals.

      1. COYS Down Under
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Ah ok. Guess that makes sense.

      2. The Fantastic Mr Fox
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        So the maximum involvement a player can have is 50% right? Unless he scores a goal for which no assist is awarded. Seems am odd way of calculating weightage

        1. Spreadsheet
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          Basically, yes. Not necessarily the best indicator, but as it's consistent it works fine for a comparison between players - you just want a player that is most likely to be involved in goals!

      3. RedLightning
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 13 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        I assumed that it meant the player's goals plus assists as a percentage of the team's goals, so Defoe has 4 out of 6.
        It is of course not possible to get points both for assisting and scoring the same goal.

        Note that 2 of the other categories are Team Goals Scored and Opposition Team Goals Conceded - not Team Goals Plus Assists Scored and Opposition Team Goals Plus Assists Conceded.

        1. Spreadsheet
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          You could be right 🙂 need clarification from Net Gains I suppose...

          1. 1Banksy
            • 8 Years
            7 years, 7 months ago

            The assists are not relevant for those categories as they are already considered by the goal being scored. The more in depth analysis of a player involvement in attacking points (including assists) is important as factors creative players who assist more than they score. That would not be recognised if just goals scored.

  8. Teddy Steddingham
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Love the changes you've made but, I have one more for discussion:

    I think it would make more sense to do 'number of unblanked games' as a percentage of games played. The point of this is to try and find a captain who will deliver on a majority of outings and injury / missed games through bookings can skew this:

    For example, Aguero has only 3 'Unblanked' games. This puts him on a par with Hazard who has blanked 4 times compared to Aguero's two.

    I know this will benefit Aguero in the PP90M but, he should also benefit from delivering more consistently.

    1. Spreadsheet
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Yes, I absolutely agree with you. I realised this towards the end of my analysis. Would be a definite improvement to the theory, especially after any January signings! If I ever run this again I'd probably make that change.

      1. Teddy Steddingham
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        I'm enjoying actually looking at the stats for the first time ever this year. Do you have an opinion on which are most important for picking a captain?

        Also, can I ask how you got the stats into the spreadsheet?

        1. Spreadsheet
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          For me I think it's two main factors: the recent (6 games) team form and the very recent (3 games) player form. Obviously it's to say "the player scoring goals in the best attacking team against the worst defensive side", but that's basically what it boils down to.

          I think it's easier to find poor defences than it is too find good attacks. And I think it's less likely for a poor defence to surprisingly keep a clean sheet than a strong attack to surprisingly blank (or maybe the attacker you wanted to not feature).

        2. Spreadsheet
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          Oh, and I take CSVs from Fantasy Overlord and run comparisons etc from week to week to determine the latest data. Then a load of analysis that I think matters to try to predict the future.

  9. sinik
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    lol this method

  10. tm245
    • 12 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    As someone who believes that captaincy is the richest source of FPL pints yet to be really analyzed well beyond our own biases about the big three indicators of form, fixtures, and class, and who has tried to explore them in seasons past, I appreciate this effort to produce a more data-focused approach. I especially like the venue specific metric, nice touch.

    However, this approach only tells at best half the story: the past. By disregarding the underlying stats that are strong indicators of future performance, the actual results here are basically asking, if the past few weeks were played all over again in gw8, and we adjusted for the change in fixtures, who would be the top scorers?

    Finally, I would use the eyeball test here -- if Capoue is ahead of Aguero, what is the list really telling me?

      • 10 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Maybe its telling you Capoue is a super mega dangerous fox in the box.

  11. Ayew Serious
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    ...

  12. Doctorasul
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Where can you find all this data?

    1. Spreadsheet
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      From the FPL site. All the goals etc are listed there for each player, and you can extract them and compare/contrast/analyse them freely.

  13. noquarternt
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Thanks for myth-busting accounts trawling for twitter followers with flirty fantasy football messages.