| Player | Club | Factors | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No Change |  Kelleher | BRE | C |
| No Change |  Raya Martin | ARS | B |
| No Change |  Martinez | AVL | C, Vs |
| No Change |  Darlow | LEE | C, Vs, £ |
| Player | Club | Factors | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No Change |  van Dijk | LIV | B |
| No Change |  Gabriel Magalhรฃes | ARS | A |
| No Change |  Hill | BOU | A, £ |
| Up |  Thiaw | NEW | B |
| No Change |  OโReilly | MCI | A, OoP |
| No Change |  Andersen | FUL | B |
| No Change |  Muรฑoz | CRY | C |
| No Change |  Kayode | BRE | B |
| No Change |  Cash | AVL | C, Vs |
| No Change |  Rodon | LEE | B, Vs, £ |
| Player | Club | Factors | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No Change |  Bruno Fernandes | MUN | A |
| Up |  Palmer | CHE | C |
| Up |  Gordon | NEW | B |
| No Change |  Wilson | FUL | A |
| Down |  Semenyo | MCI | B |
| No Change |  Dango Ouattara | BRE | B |
| No Change |  Rogers | AVL | C, Vs |
| No Change |  Ismaila Sarr | CRY | B |
| No Change |  Rice | ARS | C |
| No Change |  Tavernier | BOU | B, £ |
| No Change |  Anderson | NFO | B, £ |
| No Change |  Stach | LEE | B, Vs, £ |
| Player | Club | Factors | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No Change |  Haaland | MCI | B |
| No Change |  Thiago | BRE | B |
| No Change |  Ekitikรฉ | LIV | B |
| No Change |  Joรฃo Pedro | CHE | A |
| No Change |  Bowen | WHU | B |
| No Change |  Calvert-Lewin | LEE | C, Vs |
Paul Chelseaโs poor form continues as they crash out the FA Cup in round four, leaving Europe as their only real crack at silverware this season. Birmingham keep up their great cup form, Stoke blow away Brighton and an unimpressive Man United XI see off a Crawley side that will no doubt be patronised as “plucky” in many of this morning’s broadsheets.
Almunia is terrible, the fact that he was captain today made it even worse...cannot wait to see the back of him
Boo replay!
well, i got lucky laying arsenal, but made a nice few quid. Knew they had a chance (orient) with that lineup. KNew they wouldnt get hammered anyway! Nice call DB , yet another!
http://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/2011/02/20/fa-cup-scout-notes-round-4-replay-round-5-saturday-2/comment-page-7/#comment-1406012
Arsahvin was an inch away from making it 2-0 as i thought. meh its the fa cup. What you win ?
meh, 62 sopondulicks- leaves me even for the weekend, could have been up 800 if it wasnt for leicester int he rigby yesterday man, almost died of disappointment. 4 bet accumulator, leicester had to win by 11 or more, won by 9, missed 4 kicks, coutless try chances, and hit the cross bar with a drop last ick of the game. majorly guted.
ANyway, ur porno mag are laying tonight, and a couple of people reckon bilbao might get something. any thoughts?
Biblao are a very decent team and I believe have some record in Spain for holding Barcelona scoreless when they met in the cup this year and Barcelona only went through on away goals
Saying that they are away from their fortress and given what happened Barcelona midweek id expect them to turn up properly focused. But Bilbao have the players to trouble but they may not get enough of the ball to do so.
Llorente maybe be worth a punt as an anytime scorer if Puyol is still out.
3-1.
cheers. see below, put the write up doen there for everyone
Lol at the female Elvis impersonator in the directors box! ๐
Does this mean the Gunners will have one of their EPL matches rescheduled to accommodate FA Cup replay against Orient?
OK thanks for clearing that up!!
Quadruple still on ๐
So tired of BBC magic of the cup and false reporting. "Fifty-three places separate these teams in the league - nothing separates them as we enter the final minute of stoppage time. Can Orient hang on?"
Firstly its Arsenal second team and obviously Orient will be up for it. Where would that Arsenal team finish anyway if they played each week? Mid table at best.
Plus is the FA Cup which is the 3rd competition on their or any decent clubs list and they have a carling cup final next week
They were saying the same nonsense yesterday about Crawley nearly getting a result against the "league leaders". When the team United put out would do well to stay in the division.
Nonsense again from the BBC
i disagree with all of that to be honest
whoever runs out on to the pitch with the man utd badge on is a man utd player and the team will always be called man utd
same goes for arsenal or anyone
Yes of course they are a squad member and a player from Arsenal / United. Its the use of the league positions to try and compare them is nonsense/
Its practically a full other team which is 1st and 2nd in the league so it means not in the context bar the name on the jerey.
They might have well have said there was 55 places between Orient and Real Madrid. Or maybe the next time Man United U 18 are playing they can mention how many positions there are between their opponents and the United senior team.
As it happens I agree with DBR here, United and Arsenal chose not to play the sides that have got them to 1st and 2nd in the league so it is daft to make the comparison.
I don't agree with you however criticising the BBC for it. They are there to promote the cup as it's only competition they screen live in the face of fierce competition from the PL and CL. The FA Cup has taken so much beating recently and the new proposals for seeding is a total disgrace.
well sai Granville.
Agreed. But I swear DBR could start an argument in an empty phone booth.
There are many things in media that are catered for people who dont question anything.
I just dont like any sort of false reporting in any form just to sway the masses to watch it. For me the product is the product and no amount of made up "magic" is going to take from the fact the its a cup which will never be as it was due to better competitions elsewhere and the changing of the game.
They were doING much of the same this morning during the West Brom - Wolves game. Took me nearly 5min to find a link to the scores as they had 2 full page captions on live Formula one testing taking over the full screen.
Agreed on the seeding thing. I think BBC need to get over the fact that the game has moved on. Better to adapt and move on rather than promote cringe worthy stuff.
Not exactly Colchester V Leeds or Hereford v Newcastle is it?
"Fifty-three places seperate these teams in the league"
Is that not factually correct? Or should they have said 53 places seperate Leyton Orient and Arsenal's first choice 11? ๐
Its still doesnt mean the team Orient or Crawley played this week has anything to do with 1st or 2nd in the league.
If the real team played them it would probably 9-0 in both matches. And if they got a draw then it would an amazing result
But lets not let facts get in the way of reporting from the BBC using anything they can to try and make something meaningless meaningful
The team that Crawley played are first in the League and Leyton played second - that's a fact!
There's no such thing as a "Real Team" it's a squad game.
Man Utd played Hernandez, Rooney, Carrick, Gibson, Smalling, Brown, Rafael who have all contributed to Man Utd this season.
Arsenal played Almunia, Sagna, Squillaci, Rosicky, Denilson, Song, Arshavin, Chamakh and Bendtner who have all contributed to Arsenal being second this season.
Rooney played 45min in the cup and wasnt half arsed for good reason.
The players who are making a difference in both teams - Vidic, VDS,evra,rio,scholes, fletcher, Nani, Berbatov
Djrourou,Kos,Cesc, Nasri,RVP, etc werent anywhere to be seen.
75% of that list have had little to no contribution to the position of their teams in the league
wow you are talking absolutel bullshit mate
FPL Open table has updated. 64th seed currently ranked at 3300.
Can I join? ๐
When is the Arsenal/Orient replay? Will it effect any of their gameweeks?
it's in GW28... so it just confirms no fixture against Spurs. doesn't change any others
Fabregas likely to go down by 0.1 as a result of him missing a week?
I've got him, but thinking of getting rid for Cahill (who I had planned to bring in for Nolan), then bringing Cesc back in for Nolan the following week.
Worth getting rid of Cesc to field 11? or save the transfer and the 0.1?
Points are worth more than the team value now.
Barcelona v Athletic Bilbao - Sky Sports 1 (Sunday 2000GMT)
No team is more familiar with Barcelona under Pep Guardiola than Athletic Bilbao and the Basques will be looking to use that knowledge and experience to their advantage when they travel to the Camp Nou on Sunday evening.
This will be the tenth meeting between the two sides in less than two years and though Joaquin Caparros' men have yet to get the better of the champions, results and performances in head-to-heads over the past 12 months show some improvement.
Indeed, the recent Copa del Rey double-header will serve as huge encouragement for the visitors as they emerged unbeaten over the course of three hours with Barca squeezing through on away goals having been on the rack for long periods in the return leg at San Mames.
With this in mind, it might be worth investing some loose change on the draw at 9/1.
It's difficult to make any kind of case for the away win at 20/1 due to the obvious gulf in class but the layers, in their terror of Barca's brilliance, have been pushing the stalemate out to increasingly tempting proportions in recent weeks and nobody more so than Victor Chandler.
The Gibraltar-based firm were best price 7/1 about the draw at El Molinón last weekend when the Catalans' winning streak finally hit the buffers at 16 matches against Sporting Gijon.
And in spite of the potential stammering of momentum that result might create, they same firm have now gone a full two points bigger than all of their competitors on the spoils being shared once again.
*so ayway, very tempted to do a small lay on barca, them being 1.16 at the moemnt. any thoughts? DB got bac to me above
Bilbao have won four of their last five. Only Barca can match that.
But I think the backlash from midweek could be huge. 4-1.
did u rad my woe above on the leicester game man? unreal, dunno if u watched the game,
anyway, about the backlash- i dunno, id mroe expect them to be subdued, sorta like i expected arsenal to be today-in my experience, backlashed fail to materialise after a big blow, more often than not
Yeah, stayed clear of that game - rubbish conditions. Was it Hamilton who knocked on when they looked like they had a 14-man overlap? Thought that big Kiwi back-rower also scored, but the pedantic ref decided it was a millisecond after he'd got bored with giving them advantage.
yeah hamilton im pretty sure. Staunton's missed kicks , everything, it was like the devil was against me=
had exeter +3, quins -11, bath -4 and leicterter -10. really gutted still to be honest! 800 odd quid ๐
to top it all off, they hit the crossbar with the waldrom drop last kick of the game. Ive never been that unlucky before. My own fault for doing a quad, but the way i lost it wasn't my fault. evil was in the air ๐
Leeds boss Neil Back after being tonked 39-0 today: "I am pleased with the character we showed."
Yes, Neil. Of course you are.
funnily enough, had leeds +17 today a small bet. only handicap i go wrong all weeked. (bar leicester of course)
they were so bad it was frightening, commentators online were so disgusted. they showed no character, sarries werent all that
Betting Zone copy and paste.
no f**king shit, i always stick them up here ye spastic, and peole know thats where theyre from. Bet you thought you caught me trying to pass that off as my own, when the people i asked, DB, know i knwo fook all about spanish football.
Now go bac to your shine box you sad little toe rag
is anyone else shocked that premier league games are being played the day of the fa cup final?
ridiculous
No more cup final day then, it is a joke to be honest.
i'm amazed more isn't being said about it in the media
i've only heard alan green getting angry about it
the fa are f*cking useless
Alan fkn Green gets angry if a player picks his fkn nose.
The FA want the Champions League final at Wembley because they NEED the cash after spending more on the stadium than Holland/Belgium did to build/refit all their stadiums for the Euro 2000 tourney (or some ridiculous stat to that effect).
They have to move the FA Cup Final from before then or hold it at another venue because FIFA don't want the pitch having any feet on it beforehand.
Just saw that Gignac is definitely out for the United game and Remy is also a doubt ๐
Fergie keeping a close eye on this guy?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathieu_Valbuena
if anyone is keen on a Fifa11 game on PS3 add me now.
my nick; eskimofriend.
I'm on now....
Never has a man dominated as much as I did during the Premier League round. Unbelievable form from Priest himself.
As much as it wants to make me cut my fingers off, I have to reluctantly agree.
Still feel robbed of that Ronaldo question though.... ๐
Still haven't recovered from being denied that Bilyaletdinov shout.... Answered it inside a second, and they wouldn't bloody allow it!
Dunno how it worked, but it would take me longer than a second to type Billy's name.
Well done you guys - excellent!!!
Jamsiep, i didnt give it because the rules in the beginning was clear.. no abbreviations! Last time, we had a question and answer was ibrahimovic! obviously most answered ibra very rapidly and someone answered ibrahimovic only 1-2 secs later! The pt went to the guy who answered ibra 1st but obviously it was not fair to the one who typed ibrahimovic.. thats the only reason we put that rule! sorry mate but congrats for the win.. ๐
ha! It's fine, I never saw the rule in the first place, but now you've explained it I'm fine with it all. Although it's not as if anyone else had got the question right though, so giving the abbreviation wasn't any advantage whatsoever. But rules are rules....
P.S. It was me that got the point for 'Ibra' last week too. ๐
Well played Jnr. Real Madrid Anagram won it for us though.
I mean in terms of its outcome- I did shockingly ๐
Who was it that laughed at my St.Etienne answer? Cheeky bugger, that was the only question I got correct!
You Guys were way too quick for me.
I'm 40 years old, so it was an easier answer for me to go for, as St. Etienne were quite a team in the 70's. I have zero CL knowledge. I do support Wolves after all. ๐
As soon as the question appeared, I pictured Dominique Rocheteau marauding around Europe in the 70's, so that's how I got the answer. More an educated guess.
You'll never beat West Brom! (8)
I remember a few victories in the distant past, but you are right, our recent record is very ordinary. Got close today, but sounds like that would have been harsh on The Baggies. If we can beat Blackpool, and that's a big if, then a point away to you, won't seem so bad after all.
you stopped me getting it
Nice one Pop.
And well done team drogs ballacks, got closer than I thought in the end tbh.
Too quick for me too! ๐
ooo Last Man Standing will be tight this GW
If I was Man City with unlimited money and had to buy a player to fill my attacking midfield role....
I'd fork out 500m for Rooney
I'm talking FPL wise, I can't support having the two. I'm sure both will score big within their next three games, can't decide who.
kieran 'career built on nothing but promise' gibbs wasn't great for their goal
Not a fan of the Gibbmeister? I like him, hope he gets loaned out at some point.
same but he really did choke. Didn't communicate with partner so both went in, hesitated and sure enough Tehoue or whatever his name is blew right by him. Can't make mistakes like that. That said, he'll be a great replacement to Clichy, sometimes I can't tel the difference between the two other than the fact that Gibbs likes to sit up top a bit at times and Clichy will make the run.
i hate when people pick on 1 mistake so i will retract my comment, didn't even the watch the game for starters. basically i want to say i think gibbs is overrated for the little he's actually done in his short career. for people to say he should already replace clichy is scandalous imo.
whispers in the england camp from the senior players seem to be that they really rate him. i personally think he's still done nothing in the premiership and champions league yet to merit this reputation, but i can recognise his potential.
problem is he's too good to go out on loan but not quite good enough to replace clichy. a bit of a dilemma as regualr games will only benefit him and probably make him less injury prone too.
You missed the key word "He'll". Did I say he'll replace him for the starting next week, no, and he shouldn't. But if we were in person could you tell me with a straight face that if Clichy were to suddenly drop dead, they wouldn't have a good replacement in Gibbs. I'm not talking smack, just clarifying.
Btw, going out on loan doesn't translate to being out of favor. Look at Ramsey, he's fit now and Wenger wants to play him, but it would be dumb to take out other people, so he loaned him out to Cardiff.
Sidenote: Is it suddenly trendy again in UK to use the term "scandalous"?
i wasn't replying to you
he was replying to you.
I'm quite a fan of using the word 'scandalous'.
the thing is gibbs would never be allowed to go out on loan as he's first back up at lb. i doubt any manager would let their first back up in a position go out on loan. ramsey after his injury was way down the pecking order so rightly went out on loan
So he's fecked, not good enough to displace Clichy, too important to go out on loan. Maybe he should do a Pique and join another club.
Do anyone really know how good/bad he is? He's played a handful of games and somehow managed to get a couple of England caps. It's difficult to even put a transfer price on him.
i think he's in an unfortunate place with his dilemma. my initial point was based on a lot of gooners, including mfaulkner on here, that seem to really rate the guy. i'm personally not sure what it's based on.
Too good to go out on loan? Negatory. I'd consider him to be in the Welbeck, Cleverley band of potential. If Clichy is no.1 he should go out on loan for sure. Look what it did for Wilshere.
it's nothing to do with ability. it's how valuable you are to the manager at that time. welbceck wasn't 2nd choice to anyone at man utd, nor was cleverley
Applebonkers is right. If clichy get an injured they've no cover
if clichy gets injured they really need gibbs. if cleverley got injured this season man utd have a load of centre mids or in park, giggs, nani, valencia, le parsnip loads of wingers. if welbeck got injured they have rooney berbs hernandez and owen. last year arsenal had diaby, denilson or even rosicky and nasri to join fabs and song in the middle so like the others wilshere was a different scenario
Don't try and use reason with AP/Quaid... you will never dampen his ultra powered United blinkers.
I agree with Apples but not for the reason he said exactly. Traore is already out on loan and I didn't think of that till Apple responded. If they loaned out Gibbs and Clichy was injured we'd be screwed. It would be great to loan out Gibbs, but the given situation isn't bad either. Four competitions is bound to guarantee intense playing time when he does get it. Save the odd Leyton Orient game.
that's what i mean though i'm sure wenger would much rather have gibbs to call upon than that bamby on ice sprinter traore.
p.s i wasn't being rude by saying i wasn't replying to you, simply stating that .. well i wasn't replying to you so wasn't having a go at anything you said.
and yes i don't know about trendy btu i'm a big fan of scandalous ๐
Oh, no it's all good. I kinda like a slightly heated discussion, though lol.
i've seen more heat in susan boyle's bedroom
Clichy can't defend. He's the main weak link in Arsenal's first XI.
FACT.
That's a joke right? Not Squillaci, or Almunia, or even Koscielney? Koscielney is def "worse" than Clichy.
1) Clichy is physically and mentally weak, 2) He is not tall enough or strong enough to out-muscle ANYONE, and often loses out in aerial battles
2) He lacks focus and often makes glaring errors at the back, leading to penalties, free-kicks and often goals.
3) His main asset is pace, but on making runs forward he often leaves arsenal exposed to counter-attacks down their left.
4) MOST worryingly for an Arsenal player his skill level is quite low - he very rarely beats a man for skill or plays 1-2s a la, A Cole, P Evra.
5) His creativity, crossing and vision are also a concern, he rarely produces a pass (v Barca being a clear exception) that opens up the opposition or leads to a goal
6) While clearly not solely responsible, Clichy's time as first choice LB has conincided with Arsenal winning nothing.
7) Compare and contrast his work with that of Bacary Sagna on the right, who manages to strike the correct balance of strength, resolution and aggresion whilst offering an willing, able and occasionally penetrative attacking threat.
Should have been "8 reasons for dropping Clichy...." ๐
clichy is just as tall as evra and cahley. next!
roberto carlos too... a low centre of gravity certainly helps a full-backs agility and speed of movement.
BUT... a good full back also makes up for this by applying extra aggrssion to their game.
Clichy does not.
really fearing a big score from RVP against stoke.. my own fault for not having him
When a top class racehorse participates in a warm up event for a major prize, they very frequently do little more than is strictly necessary. Similary, I can't see Arsenal racking up a cricket score against Stoke; they'll have no need to run their race early. I reckon they'll sit on a 1 -0 lead and will only move through the gears if Stoke are silly enough to score!
Stoke will score against Arsenal. It's a tough game for them.
As long as it's not Huth.
If it's not Huth then it's Carew, if not Carew then Jones, if not Jones, then Shawx. They have so many of those weapons. Haven't seen the Brighton game yet, but I heard their goalie couldn't cope with the set piece threat.
Agreed. My nearest opponent has Huth and Szczesny, so I'm happy with goals going in. That Stoke set piece line up is the biggest and baddest around.
Its a tough game for Stoke, since coming up they have lost 2-0 and 4-1, their torpedo throws want phase Scezceny, he is 6 4 and brave not a weedy little Spaniard or a nervous Pole.
Special Man Utd filter, Granville is in control tonight ๐
you wait till we appoint dennis wise as our director of banter
Link your ticker please!
or upload the hard copy so i can put it all in one columnlike any sane human would
http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae77/djwatford/groupfixtures.png
I used it aswell.
It's amazing.
Planed all my transfers now. Unlike in fpl, it's easier to plan transfers in this as players don't tend to get injured and prices don't rise/fall etc.
Going to have a slow start due to not doing many transfers but by the next day that there are 2 games in a day, I will have an average of 4 players playing every day.
This includes the last 2 days of the group stages where i will be having 8 players on satueday and 7 on sunday.
On that day, I'm leaving, on a jet plane - don't know, when I'll be back again ... ๐
Careful ... ๐
anyone with any minor knowledge of spanish football think barca have more than a 1/6 chance of loosing or drawing tonight?
jara just got his first 2 pointer of the year
Without looking at the FPL site, is that really true? Amazing.
christopher brunt. never again!
I don't understand why he got so much hype. I never saw his games and his FPL returns were sporadic. I'm assuming he looked good on the TV?
set pieces and a huge glut of assists which were long ago. i though if he's going to bounce back these are the 2 fixtures to do it
Hey - ab - well done in that quiz, mate!!! ๐
i only got about 4 i think. i prefer the slightly harder ones so speed isn't too big an issue, otherwise i panic and just bash random places on my keyboard.
if there was a prize for most correct answers... ๐
350 odd isn't as funny as -14 in the cricket btw? ๐
Not as funny - but much more fulfilling! ๐
First 2-pointer of the calendar year 2011, but Jara's fifth two-pointer of the season.
Granville - any idea what happens at the end of the story of The Three Little Pigs? I keep starting to tell it to the kids then getting stuck once I set up the scenario of houses made of hay/straw/bricks...
The big bad wolf comes along and blows down the straw house and eats the pigs, then they build one out of sticks and he blows that one down and eats the pigs. Then he gets to the brickhouse and huffs and puffs and blows and it doesn't fall down. He hasn't got enough breath force.
Moral of the story, big bad wolf should give up smoking 40 a day. ๐
The pigs bought houses they couldn't afford and the banks lent em the money. Now they're stuck with negative equity.
๐
Anyone NOT going with Watson (c) tomorrow?
Hope Aussies do well, I've five of the buggers ๐
he seems like the best thing since sliced bread. i've been looking at their last few ODI's and he's hardly passed 20 with the bat. i guess it must be due to his likelihood to bowl 10 overs as well as open
All-rounders are the business in this, theoretically anyway.
Nope.
imagine sehwag bowled ๐ฏ
Keepers are reliable old fellas too... Sangakarra got 50 points for 3 catches and a stumping today.
I've got Haddin for this one, not had a decent keeper so far so I thought I'd spend a bit on one to see how it goes
8
Gone mad for it. Since making the ticker I noticed I had too many players not playing for ages, thought I may as well try and get a good start going. Besides Aussies play again pretty soon (though it would be a tough match against NZ)
Are you kidding, didn't you see him in the ODI series against England?
lol just seen if i went 1 match further down he got 161 not out ๐
TAXI
btw do you know when the deadline before matches is? i.e do you have time after the toss to change captain depending on if australia are batting first or not
I've realised that I'm going to have to have a player playing in every single match of the group stages.... Makes no sense to go into a game without any players, because you would effectively be passing up the opportunity of a captain.
Ryan ten Doeschate and Tamim Iqbal are going to be mainstays in my team for that exact reason.
Respect for the quiz, jamsiep! ๐ I wouldn't do that, if I were you ...
i hate when you make sense ๐
never thought of it like that, i'll be missing out on load of matches to make sure i've got an orgy of big guns against the weaker nations. annoyingly i'm committed to my tactic now
Get used to it buddy, I'm a pretty sensible guy. ๐
Hardly. ๐
ten doeschate would be prefect for those games between minnows especialy as an all rounder. he's described as, 'the best cricketer among all the associate nations' (yes i had to do some research!).
...just don't finger him http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NARXwOIFwY0
Now you're talking! ๐
the more i watch barca, the more i think theyre very beatable. ALl they seem to do most of the time is try get the ball to 30 yards out, then try play through to the forward peeling off the defender, I honestly think if a team played a sweeper against them, just picking up the runners but keeping the offside line, theyre not all that
+42, RBJ!
Loving that Vela goal today, sent me up 3,000 places ๐
VP match anyone?
Nah watching a bit of Bruce Parry. Damned good show.
Good news for all the Roma fans out there..... Ranieri has resigned. ๐
Just in time to take over the Chelsea job when Ancelotti gets sacked this week ๐
I look forward to the inevitable Daily Mail article about a possible Ranieri/Ancelotti swap.
Who was the first manager to get sacked this year again? Misses that answer.
The question was about last year, and the answer was Paul Hart.
Guess who got it right?
Yeah, it was me. ๐
You were good to the point where i thought there was 99% chance you were cheating, as after that round you were hopeless ๐
๐ I'm a Premier League specialist, I was truly awful at the anagram round! Even the lysdexics were getting more answers than me! ๐
Not the Daily Pale again ... ๐
Price for 2 adults and 2 children to go to City's match today - £40, attendance: 27k
Price for 1 adult to go to United's match yesterday - £41, attendance: 75k
The City is yours my f*cking arse
34 years
And you wonder why everybody thinks that all united supporters are complete tw*ts.. because of stupid fookin posts from the likes of you..
Good to get that one of my chest ๐
You shouldn't really be bragging that your club massively overcharges. Not a great thing.
"Massively overcharges"- it's only a quid more than city ATB.... ๐
Price for 2 adults and 2 children to go to City’s match today – £40,
Price for 1 adult to go to United’s match yesterday – £41
One of us is shit at maths.
2 adults and 2 children to go to City’s match today – £40, does that not say that the total is £40 for 2 adults and 2 children?
"massively overcharges"
£40 isn't massively overcharging considering it's £30 to watch a Championship side. Hence, oh dear.
£40 quid to watch a Blue Square Premier side play Utd's F team.... Hmmmm....
Precisely. Hence 'massively overcharging'.
It's £40 for an 'executive box' at crawley town on a match day.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_JTBT1tj6fMs/R0bMXraqKGI/AAAAAAAAAQM/SUl40zkK5yI/s400/cardboardbox.jpg
We normally do, but then we didn't get any home games in the FA cup this season ๐
Watching them against Crawley should not be £40 per ticket.
Part of my point..
But maybe that wasn't as clear. Saying United fans go to the games no matter what the Glazers charge, or who it is.
Two ways of looking at that Soup,
1) Utd fans are more dedicated
2) Utd fans are pretty thick.
Not having a pop at Utd per se, Newcastle fans are equally gullible. Look at Sheppard and Hall taking the piss out of them for buying overpriced shirts.
Well maybe in this case ๐
Sorry Tommy! ๐
I'm hardly bragging? Firstly, it's showing that the Glazers are complete and utter twats..? Secondly, it's showing United fans have dedication...?
What's your point..?
Dont season ticket holders have to buy cup games at United?
If so the bulk of yesterday game was sold before the season.
Why don't you talk about how United struggle to sell out these days.
