Metrics
11 April 2018 1212 comments
Ragabolly Ragabolly
Share:

In this latest Metrics article, we will look at how the teams of the (updated) top 10,000 managers are shaping up ahead of the long-awaited Double Gameweek 34.

As a start, looking at the current chip usage for the updated top 10k, we see that the majority of managers still have their Bench Boost and Triple Captain chips intact.

Only 17.36% have used Bench Boost already, while the percentage for Triple Captains is 28.85%.

members

Both chips are highly likely popular for Gameweek 34, with the Bench Boost expected to be the more prevalent on the back of Wildcards in Gameweeks 32 and 33.

Reduced rotation – compared with Double Gameweek 37 – and the prospect of using the Triple Captain on Harry Kane against West Brom and Newcastle also promotes the Bench Boost at this point.

So that chip will be my focus…

To get an idea about the current status of teams, I calculated that the average number of Double Gameweek players in the current top 10k to be an impressive 7.82 players.

The full distribution of percentages is shown below, where we see that the most existing situation is owning six-to-seven players.

members

This figure does not include free transfers or hits taken so far. To include that into consideration, note that the average number of current free transfers in the top 10k is 1.26, which means that the top 10k could have an average of 9.08 Double Gameweek players before taking hits.

Next, by focusing just on the managers who still own the Bench Boost chip, we find that they own an average of 8.03 Double Gameweek players, with an average of 1.26 free transfers.

That indicates that potential Bench Boost managers in the top 10k can have a squad of 9.26 players that play twice.

This raises the question of whether the average top 10k manager will still be tempted to activate Bench Boost with just nine or so Double Gameweek players – or perhaps ten if they take a transfer hit.

Essentially, their benches will be playing just a single match, with another one or two single fixture players in their starting XI.

But again, we must remember that quality will likely win out over quantity so that could prove the deciding factor.

However, I believe that we see a good number of Triple Captain chips played this week.

Managers who own around the average of nine players will doubtless attempt to get that up to eleven – or ten with Mohamed Salah) – but may forgo the Bench Boost and turn instead to Kane or a Manchester United attacker with the Triple Captain.

There is currently 19% of potential Bench Boost managers with 11 or more Double Gameweek players. That group seem most likely to turn to the Bench Boost.

While the remaining 81% could be split when it comes to deciding their chip of choice, if we speculate that the split will be 50-50, then perhaps 49% of the top 10k is expected to Bench Boost in Gameweek 34. That would increase the tally of Bench Boost chips played in the top 10k from 17.36% to 66.95%.

However, this is – as mentioned – purely speculative: rough estimates to guide our thinking.

Along that same line of thought, I estimate the usage of Triple Captains this week to be around half the managers who decided not to Bench Boost, which would be around 20% of the top 10k.

In summary, looking at the numbers, a very rough estimate shows that the use of Bench Boost and Triple Captains in Gameweek 34 maybe around 40-55% and 15-30% in the top 10k.

Let’s now get an idea on how the Bench Boost line-ups will look.

The following is the most selected team for managers that still own Bench Boost chip in the top 10k.

members

We see that there are many players that have a single fixture.

Nicolas Otamendi (31.28%), Andy Robertson (30.47%) and Roberto Firmino (48.81%) will cause headaches for managers who want to use the Bench Boost chip since they all have a single fixture.

Ben Davies (27.11%) is also a rotation doubt and might play just a single game.

Meanwhile, it is likely that Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang (72.81%) is in many squads as a placeholder for Kane and Romelu Lukaku.

In my opinion, if your squad has a greater number of “nailed-on” starters and Double Gameweek players than this “template”, then the Bench Boost chip looks a very viable strategy.

We can also see that there is currently a lack of Manchester United assets in this template squad, with the exception of David de Gea.

But this seems likely to change with current transfer trends.

It’s also worth considering that the likes of Lukaku, Alexis Sanchez and Kane won’t be as highly owned as managers will need to make sacrifices to acquire them all.

Finally, I leave you with the current ownership of players in the top 10k.

This offers an indication of potential differentials either in your squad or being targeted with your Gameweek 34 transfers. Again note that these percentages are fluctuating daily and will look different once the deadline has passed.

Player Ownership Percentage – Top 10k Managers

Player Top 10k Ownership
Mohamed Salah 81.20%
Aubameyang 69.87%
David de Gea 55.06%
Roberto Firmino 52.83%
Riyad Mahrez 50.08%
Heung-Min Son 47.88%
Willian 43.25%
Jamie Vardy 42.41%
Nicolás Otamendi 34.07%
Andrew Robertson 31.11%
Ben Davies 29.48%
Matthew Lowton 28.43%
Harry Kane 24.90%
Luka Milivojevic 24.33%
Romelu Lukaku 24.32%
Marcos Alonso 24.26%
Raheem Sterling 23.00%
Pascal Groß 22.68%
Chris Smalling 22.28%
Mathew Ryan 20.36%
Ashley Barnes 19.77%
Nick Pope 18.98%
Robert Elliot 18.47%
Benjamin Chilwell 18.27%
Wes Morgan 18.15%
Shkodran Mustafi 17.06%
César Azpilicueta 16.57%
Ben Mee 15.76%
Virgil van Dijk 12.87%
Christian Eriksen 12.65%
Jesse Lingard 12.14%
Dele Alli 12.07%
Andreas Christensen 11.98%
Xherdan Shaqiri 11.43%
James Tarkowski 11.41%
Callum Wilson 11.33%
Leroy Sané 11.19%
Marko Arnautovic 10.92%
Lukasz Fabianski 10.76%
Harry Maguire 10.72%


After studying these metrics, I have a stronger appreciation of the effectiveness of the Bench Boost in Gameweek 34.

Like many other managers that have built towards the activation of the chip at this stage, I have more Double Gameweek players than the average of nine-ish. I’m also content with the prospects of my single fixture players.

However, arguably, the metrics reveal that the average Bench Boost line-up is not overly impressive. So those playing the Triple Captain could yet be the winners in Gameweek 34 if they can hit the most profitable captaincy option. That’s always a “big if”.

1,212 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. The Hindu Monkey
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Good to go?

    34 - triple captain on Lukaku

    De Gea
    Tark Lowton Cedric Maquire
    Alli Gross Mahrez
    Lukaku (TC) Kane Barnes

    Fab Sane Milo Lejunes

    1. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Looks good.

      1. The Hindu Monkey
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        Thanks Horse

    2. KUNingas
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Yep

    3. RAFA THE GAFFA
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Very nice 🙂 good luck

  2. Rupert The Horse
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Staged or not?

    https://youtu.be/Q83qEPXsvco

    1. the snazzy viking
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      nah

    2. Numb
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Is that your sis?

      1. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        Yeah. She swore it wasn’t staged but I don’t know.

  3. DOCLES
    • 16 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Pogba/Rudiger or Alonso/Lingard?

    1. Stevie B
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      I think A is better.

    2. RAFA THE GAFFA
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Tough. Both could do well. A just as more nailed

  4. KUNingas
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    A) Auba + Son -> Kane + Lingard (-4)
    B) Auba + Salah -> Vardy + Sanchez (-4)
    C) Auba -> Vardy

    1. RAFA THE GAFFA
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      A

  5. Stevie B
    • 15 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    My team is:

    De Gea, Ryan
    Smalling, Vertonghen, Morgan, Lowton, Mustafi
    Salah, Son, Mahrez, Willian, Lewis Cook
    Aubameyang, Lukaku, Barnes

    What is better?

    A) Mustafi and Aubameyang -> Chilwell and Kane
    B) Mustafi and Aubameyang -> Alonso and Vardy

    Thank you!

    1. mcsteely
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      A I would say

    2. RAFA THE GAFFA
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      A easy

  6. Limited & Mediocre Mana…
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Cool article

  7. Team Cruel
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Kane awarded goal against Stoke City

    https://www.premierleague.com/news/661917?sf186748409=1&utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=referral

    Ridiculous. Robbed 14 points by FPL towers.

    1. Limited & Mediocre Mana…
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Eriksen's IMO

    2. Snikii
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Dont know if serious...

    3. MTPockets
      8 years, 3 months ago

      I want my points then.

    4. The Hindu Monkey
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      After taking into account his testimony? You absolute what?

      Fa is a joke.

    5. Jigger & Pony
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Lol

    6. syke63
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Joke. Never touched it imo.

    7. Mark
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 19 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      FPL aren't robbing anyone. The game relies on decisions made on the day or at least decisions reviewed an hour after the final game.

      I've no idea what has changed opinion on the goal. I've seen it many many times and I still can't be certain either way.

      But like points lost for a rescinded card after further review, there's nothing FPL can do - there has to be a cut off time for updating points.

      1. Pep says
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        Why does there? It's not like it happened last season. Opta can change their data, why can't FPL simply alter one number in a system and let the algorithms do the rest.

        I know it's a rule, I'm just disagreeing with your cut off remark considering it only happened a few days ago

        1. Witty Pun: Not good at this…
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 3 months ago

          Because updating the whole game for one goal would be inefficient? Unfair for people who bet on places in MLs in this week to have everything changed around? Those just off the top of my head I'm sure there are more valid reasons.

  8. LC1
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Lol the PL Accreditation Appeals Channel have given Kane the goal...
    https://twitter.com/PLComms/status/984098797654626305

    1. Stevie B
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Will Eriksens 15 points change? Thank you!

      1. LC1
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        No idea to be honest.. hopefully not.

      2. Snikii
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        no, nothing changes

      3. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        No. This has happens so many times. Game week has finished. Points are final.

    2. Toblerone52 - Zlatan Ibra-H…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Gutted we wont get these points. Could have a huge effect on minileagues etc

    3. Desperately Seeking Dusan
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      I do like Harry but this is all a bit embarrassing... is keeping the Golden Boot race alive a factor for them?

      I find it weird that FPL points don't change either, not that I have either Kane or Eriksen,

  9. fusen
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Surprised that Silva isn't in the list of players owned by the top 10k

  10. Speédy
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Great article as always. 🙂 Brilliant addition to the FFS team Ragabolly

    1. Ragabolly
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Thanks mate

  11. La vida FPL
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Cedric or tarkowski? Already own lowton.

    Anyone else less than 4.8 worth having?

    1. KUNingas
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      I would spread the risk

    2. Stevie B
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      I think that Tarkowski is better. Southampton has not the best fixtures. Leicester has a double game week and good fixtures. Their players are cheap (Morgan, Chilwell).

    3. Garth Marenghi
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Tark

  12. PL Ball
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    I'm confused. How could they possibility and conclusively know that Kane got a touch on that ball.

    Did i miss an obvious camera angle or something that showed otherwise?

    1. Limited & Mediocre Mana…
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Probably just pandering to it after Kane's stupid comments and the fact that it makes the golden boot race a fraction closer.

    2. Snikii
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      They wanted him to stop complaining

    3. St. Joseph
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      It was eriksen's goal.

      Im a Kane captainer last weekend though.

    4. seanie3
      • 15 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Complete joke, what a farce, a 3 man panel took in account Kane's testimony that he touched it!!!!!!

      I beggars belief, of course he is going to say that as he is chasing down the golden boot... what is next, has a precedent now been set to ask players after a game about something that happened during a game days after it happened!!!

      this really is crazy, at least the FPL rules clearly state that no points will be changed for either kane or eriksen for gw33 as the only window to allow for a change is upto one hour after a game.

    5. Garth Marenghi
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      His daughter’s life was on the line, had to be done.

  13. Numb
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Kane goal added!!

    1. St. Joseph
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Kane (C) fail and disappointing

      🙁

      1. Numb
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        Unlucky that

    2. TLF
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Seems crazy to me this cant/won't be added retrospectively in FPL.

      1. seanie3
        • 15 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        read the rules, they are there for a reason, despite some stupid 3 man panel agreeing with what Kane has said 4 days after the game....the FA is a laughing stock

        1. TLF
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 3 months ago

          Yeah I'm familiar with the rules but nothing is set in stone forever and can/should always be subject to review. Maybe I'm lacking an understanding of the games mechanics and the way in which the points system is generated/updated but I hope this aspect of the game is adapted in the future. I think that any change in decision should be reflected in FPL retrospectively. I know this sounds like a case of 'sour grapes' and I must admit I do own Kane, that said i've always thought it and would do on this occassion if it was my rival who owned Kane and I didnt.

  14. Hesoyam
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Worth changing Hazard and Firmi
    to Willian and Kane for -8? (used my FT already)
    I'll use bench boost for recover that -8 points

  15. St. Joseph
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Salah
    Midfielder
    Scoring for fun
    The ceiling up to 4 goals

    Surely i'll be enjoying as an owner while he's still listed as a MID this season

    🙂

    1. SAKA AND EMILE SMITH ROWE
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      He'll be a MF next season but priced at 12.5m

      1. Pep says
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        He should be a striker

  16. el polako
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    How berserk can Arnautovic go against Stoke ?
    2 goals and a red card or better ?

    1. IAWC ( It's a Wonderfu…
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Red surely

  17. IAWC ( It's a Wonderfu…
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Kane is given the goal lol

    1. el polako
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Bit pathetic from the bloke.

    2. mcsteely
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      So annoying. Robbed of 14 points!

  18. SAKA AND EMILE SMITH ROWE
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Kane's goal doesn't count for FPL hahaha

    1. TLF
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Nice one Sidney

  19. mcsteely
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Gudmundsson & Auba > A.King & Lukaku for -4

    Swapping TC to this week (Kane or Kaku) and BB in 37.

    Sound fair?

  20. Scotty B
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Foster
    Lowton Ake Alonso
    Walcott Lingard Eriksen Hazard
    Lukaku Barnes Aubamayang

    Elliot Shaqiri Baines TAA

    Use BB or use TC on Lukaku?

  21. Hagges Heroes
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    A) Auba + Sterling to Kane + Kante?

    Have FH for 35

    Go or no-go?

  22. GuillermoDickero
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    As a Kane captainer this week, that hurts haha. Could have done with the goal

  23. RAFA THE GAFFA
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Plan BB34 / FH35 / TC37. To fund Auba >> Kane which is best?

    A. Alonso >>
    1. Mee/Ward/Tarko
    2. Chilwell

    B. Son >>
    1. Albrighton
    2. Gudmundsson

    Ryan DDG
    Alonso Mustafi Morgan Lowton Smalling
    Eriksen Mahrez Willian Kenedy Son
    Auba Lukaku Austin

    1. kinghenry14
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      b1 imo

  24. LC1
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Best midfielder for 5.4m for DGW34 and DGW34 only?
    Need to rid of Gudmundsson..

    1. RAFA THE GAFFA
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      I’d say Gundmund I’d fit

      1. LC1
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        Pardon?

  25. liiusions
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    These articles are great 🙂

  26. bigdip
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Used FH and WC butgGot all my starting players on DGW.

    Thoughts?

    De Gea
    Tark Lowton Morgan Christensen
    Willian Ibe Gross Mahrez
    Kane Barnes

    (Salah, Aub, Mustafi)
    1FT, 0.6mn ITB

  27. Flynny
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Random question.

    Vardy is +80 of fpl stats

    Kane is on + 14

    What are the chances of vardy rising a full day before Kane??

    Thanks

    1. mcsteely
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      don't count on it

  28. Jigger & Pony
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    FH34 gtg?

    Lloris
    Cedric Lowton Chilwell
    Sanchez Alli Willian Pogba
    Kane Lukaku Vardy

    1. mcsteely
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Looks real good. Wish I had FH.

      Utd Defence?

      1. Jigger & Pony
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        Lower ceiling than attack so avoiding. Think Lloris can match DDG this GW.

  29. Junior ⚽
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Kane over Lukaku for the DGW?

    1. Ajax Hamsterdam
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Nope

  30. St. Joseph
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    1 FT
    A) Groß >> Lingard
    Or
    B) Dummet (SGW) >> Cedric (DGW)

    1. kinghenry14
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      b out of those imo