Metrics
11 April 2018 1212 comments
Ragabolly Ragabolly
Share:

In this latest Metrics article, we will look at how the teams of the (updated) top 10,000 managers are shaping up ahead of the long-awaited Double Gameweek 34.

As a start, looking at the current chip usage for the updated top 10k, we see that the majority of managers still have their Bench Boost and Triple Captain chips intact.

Only 17.36% have used Bench Boost already, while the percentage for Triple Captains is 28.85%.

members

Both chips are highly likely popular for Gameweek 34, with the Bench Boost expected to be the more prevalent on the back of Wildcards in Gameweeks 32 and 33.

Reduced rotation – compared with Double Gameweek 37 – and the prospect of using the Triple Captain on Harry Kane against West Brom and Newcastle also promotes the Bench Boost at this point.

So that chip will be my focus…

To get an idea about the current status of teams, I calculated that the average number of Double Gameweek players in the current top 10k to be an impressive 7.82 players.

The full distribution of percentages is shown below, where we see that the most existing situation is owning six-to-seven players.

members

This figure does not include free transfers or hits taken so far. To include that into consideration, note that the average number of current free transfers in the top 10k is 1.26, which means that the top 10k could have an average of 9.08 Double Gameweek players before taking hits.

Next, by focusing just on the managers who still own the Bench Boost chip, we find that they own an average of 8.03 Double Gameweek players, with an average of 1.26 free transfers.

That indicates that potential Bench Boost managers in the top 10k can have a squad of 9.26 players that play twice.

This raises the question of whether the average top 10k manager will still be tempted to activate Bench Boost with just nine or so Double Gameweek players – or perhaps ten if they take a transfer hit.

Essentially, their benches will be playing just a single match, with another one or two single fixture players in their starting XI.

But again, we must remember that quality will likely win out over quantity so that could prove the deciding factor.

However, I believe that we see a good number of Triple Captain chips played this week.

Managers who own around the average of nine players will doubtless attempt to get that up to eleven – or ten with Mohamed Salah) – but may forgo the Bench Boost and turn instead to Kane or a Manchester United attacker with the Triple Captain.

There is currently 19% of potential Bench Boost managers with 11 or more Double Gameweek players. That group seem most likely to turn to the Bench Boost.

While the remaining 81% could be split when it comes to deciding their chip of choice, if we speculate that the split will be 50-50, then perhaps 49% of the top 10k is expected to Bench Boost in Gameweek 34. That would increase the tally of Bench Boost chips played in the top 10k from 17.36% to 66.95%.

However, this is – as mentioned – purely speculative: rough estimates to guide our thinking.

Along that same line of thought, I estimate the usage of Triple Captains this week to be around half the managers who decided not to Bench Boost, which would be around 20% of the top 10k.

In summary, looking at the numbers, a very rough estimate shows that the use of Bench Boost and Triple Captains in Gameweek 34 maybe around 40-55% and 15-30% in the top 10k.

Let’s now get an idea on how the Bench Boost line-ups will look.

The following is the most selected team for managers that still own Bench Boost chip in the top 10k.

members

We see that there are many players that have a single fixture.

Nicolas Otamendi (31.28%), Andy Robertson (30.47%) and Roberto Firmino (48.81%) will cause headaches for managers who want to use the Bench Boost chip since they all have a single fixture.

Ben Davies (27.11%) is also a rotation doubt and might play just a single game.

Meanwhile, it is likely that Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang (72.81%) is in many squads as a placeholder for Kane and Romelu Lukaku.

In my opinion, if your squad has a greater number of “nailed-on” starters and Double Gameweek players than this “template”, then the Bench Boost chip looks a very viable strategy.

We can also see that there is currently a lack of Manchester United assets in this template squad, with the exception of David de Gea.

But this seems likely to change with current transfer trends.

It’s also worth considering that the likes of Lukaku, Alexis Sanchez and Kane won’t be as highly owned as managers will need to make sacrifices to acquire them all.

Finally, I leave you with the current ownership of players in the top 10k.

This offers an indication of potential differentials either in your squad or being targeted with your Gameweek 34 transfers. Again note that these percentages are fluctuating daily and will look different once the deadline has passed.

Player Ownership Percentage – Top 10k Managers

Player Top 10k Ownership
Mohamed Salah 81.20%
Aubameyang 69.87%
David de Gea 55.06%
Roberto Firmino 52.83%
Riyad Mahrez 50.08%
Heung-Min Son 47.88%
Willian 43.25%
Jamie Vardy 42.41%
Nicolás Otamendi 34.07%
Andrew Robertson 31.11%
Ben Davies 29.48%
Matthew Lowton 28.43%
Harry Kane 24.90%
Luka Milivojevic 24.33%
Romelu Lukaku 24.32%
Marcos Alonso 24.26%
Raheem Sterling 23.00%
Pascal Groß 22.68%
Chris Smalling 22.28%
Mathew Ryan 20.36%
Ashley Barnes 19.77%
Nick Pope 18.98%
Robert Elliot 18.47%
Benjamin Chilwell 18.27%
Wes Morgan 18.15%
Shkodran Mustafi 17.06%
César Azpilicueta 16.57%
Ben Mee 15.76%
Virgil van Dijk 12.87%
Christian Eriksen 12.65%
Jesse Lingard 12.14%
Dele Alli 12.07%
Andreas Christensen 11.98%
Xherdan Shaqiri 11.43%
James Tarkowski 11.41%
Callum Wilson 11.33%
Leroy Sané 11.19%
Marko Arnautovic 10.92%
Lukasz Fabianski 10.76%
Harry Maguire 10.72%


After studying these metrics, I have a stronger appreciation of the effectiveness of the Bench Boost in Gameweek 34.

Like many other managers that have built towards the activation of the chip at this stage, I have more Double Gameweek players than the average of nine-ish. I’m also content with the prospects of my single fixture players.

However, arguably, the metrics reveal that the average Bench Boost line-up is not overly impressive. So those playing the Triple Captain could yet be the winners in Gameweek 34 if they can hit the most profitable captaincy option. That’s always a “big if”.

1,212 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. GreenWindmill
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Right. Now when do Eriksen's points get removed?

    😉

    1. _Make
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Naughty.. Mods, delete this po.. Oh

    2. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      OOohh

  2. _Gunner
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Captain GW 34?

    A- Lukaku
    B- Kane

    1. Junior ⚽
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Wish I had the choice. Need to chose one.

    2. scubasmithy
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Have both and going with A

      1. _Make
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        Me too

    3. Neebster
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Kaku

    4. Ajax Hamsterdam
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      A

    5. Lyonnais
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      I think I like Lukaku's fixtures more...

  3. Junior ⚽
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    How to fund Kane (0.2m)

    A) Mustafi to a 5.2m DGW defender (who?)
    B) Son to Lingard (which allows Mustafi to Vertonghen -4)

    1. scubasmithy
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      B - doubly so if you have free hit left

      1. Neebster
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        B

    2. Lyonnais
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Vertonghen looks good from now onwards.

  4. Ajax Hamsterdam
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Is it worth getting rid of Bailly in order to get pogba ? That means an extra hit..( I have 3 utd players already )

    1. Neebster
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      No

      1. Ajax Hamsterdam
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        Thanks 🙂

  5. La Roja
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Well done Kane (c)’ers. You deserve all those glorious points in your account.

  6. Jigger & Pony
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Elneny points should be restored too

    1. LosBlancos
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      What happened with Elneny?

      1. Jigger & Pony
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        Red card in game. Appeal successful.

    2. Leaf
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      It’s very different situation

    3. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Yes, this is the point.

      1. Old Man
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 15 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        @Rupert
        Please don't forget to let me know that sponsorship link when it becomes available. 🙂

        1. Rupert The Horse
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          8 years, 3 months ago

          Oh very good of you. Did we swap info?
          rupert_lovibond@yahoo.co.uk

          1. Old Man
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 15 Years
            8 years, 3 months ago

            Cheers! 😀

            1. Rupert The Horse
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 13 Years
              8 years, 3 months ago

              Should have it all organised in a couple of weeks, then I can get cycling. Hope those orphans know how hard it’s going to be for me.

    4. Mysterion
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Still waiting for my Gibbs points from 13/14 🙁

  7. LosBlancos
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Bottomed
    Can we start a petition and put pressure on FPL to give us our deserved captain Kane points?

    Enough injustice in the world, we need to provide an example!

    1. Leaf
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      I know on previous page someone made a good point of comparing to the Elneny points for the wrong red card
      But this is different as the goal was claimed and awarded to Kane but then taken off ...surely the removal can only happen on definite evidence they he didn’t score ....which there isn’t as upon examination it’s clearly been shown that he did

      1. Red Dagger ✪
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        ^ This is correct.

  8. AThousandSuns
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Well I believe that is still Eriksen's goal. Kudos to Fpl for giving the right man the points.

  9. AYEW KI-EDEN MEE
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Wonder if the outcome would be the same if his name wasn't Harry Kane. No replays ultimately confirmed it has his but yet still credited. Dubious.

  10. Lyonnais
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    DDG / Ryan
    Alonso, Vertonghen, Cedric / Tarkowski, Morgan
    Salah, Mahrez, Son, Willian / Gudmundsson*
    Aubameyang, Vardy, Murray

    0.6 ITB, BB Chip active, 2 FT

    Auba will go for either Kane or Lukaku but who else would you sell to afford one of them?
    Son?

    Also what to do with Gudmundsson?
    Don't want Murray anymore as well.

  11. My heart goes Salalalalah
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Is there anywhere I can read up on why Kane wont get the points on FPL now? Its juat add to Kane, deduct from Eriksen and recalculate bonus?

    1. _Make
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      So many reasons. Done to death.

    2. Sailboats
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Nah bro. Nobodys gonna take my Eriksens points away from me.

    3. LosBlancos
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      +1

    4. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Bud, it’s happened countless times before. Once the game week is over, it’s final. The PL can over turn decisions, not FPL.

  12. OldBenKenobi
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    WHERE’S MY POINTS!!!!!!

    😆

    1. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Probably on your bench as usual. 🙂

      1. OldBenKenobi
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        Too true

    2. LosBlancos
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      We need protests and riots right NOW

  13. Rupert The Horse
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    So what do we think of this whole Kane goal situation? Childish robbery of a team mates goal, or a man deservedly trying to get a decision overturned in his chase for the golden boot?
    Eriksen seems to have come on top as a person, simply saying Kane can have it. I heard that Kane swore on his child’s life that it was his, if so, I think that’s a bit much.

    1. Rash
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      I think it's pathetic but amusing at the same time

      1. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        Like my little man.

        1. FPL Blow-In
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          8 years, 3 months ago

          😆

        2. Rash
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 3 months ago

          😆

    2. LosBlancos
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      B
      Justice before all, it isn't too much if it's true

    3. MTPockets
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Bit of both. Surprised at the lengths he'll go to, but as a professional footballer I guess it matters.

      1. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        Yes, good point.

    4. Sailboats
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      I don't care tbh, as long as he gets me FPL points

    5. Pep says
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      I think the daughter comment has been taken out of context a little.

      And when he has so adamant he touched it he was probably encouraged by friends and family to have it reviewed. Why not.

      I don't think he's cheating. No decent person would make those comments if they weren't being genuine.

      1. Rupert The Horse
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        Yes, just wondering people’s stance on it. Personally, I am glad he went for it, if Eriksen was happy for him to go ahead, then I believe it’s almost a moot point. I can imagine they had a chat and Kane went for the appeal.

    6. GENERATION X
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Delighted as an Eriksen owner but would be upset as a Kane owner - but I'm sure I've been robbed before elsewhere, swings and roundabouts. Evans/McCauley springs to mind...

  14. Maddamotha
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    I really dont get the logic behind «Kane is so hungry for the golden boot now, will score lots». These players are that hungry all season, every game. He wont start banging in lots more all of a sudden now.

  15. OldBenKenobi
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Kane’s daughter lives another day!
    Phew 😛

    1. potatoace
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      I've ordered the snipers to stand down.

      1. Sailboats
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        xD

      2. OldBenKenobi
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        😉

    2. Jigger & Pony
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      🙂

    3. Rupert The Horse
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Ah so that’s the new Bond movie.

  16. F4L
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    I want my Mustafi points

    1. Rash
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      This

  17. mad_beer ✅
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    I want my FPL money back!

  18. BobB
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 16 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Non Kane-owner, and missed the earlier argument. Why would FPL not reflect the official decision to award him the goal?

    1. Licious Lizard (delete acc)
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Way too complicated to enforce this.

      Head-to-head games, leagues etc.
      And what about if it happened in one of those GW, where there is only 1 day between GW’s? Would they have to retrospectively alter tournaments, knockout rounds etc?
      Not possible

      1. potatoace
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        It didnt though. It's not impossible. Gw34 hasn't commenced yet they can role back if they really wanted, they just can't be bothered

        1. Licious Lizard (delete acc)
          8 years, 3 months ago

          I disagree.
          They have to have definitive rules for this kind of thing or it would be way yo arbitrary imo.
          Either they will have to do it in every gw (not possible) or not at all..

          1. potatoace
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            8 years, 3 months ago

            You've missed my point. It is easily retrofixed if the decision is overturned in the same gw, before another starts. They've just decided when they set the rules whenever that they won't be arsed anymore once a gw finishes. They could have easily had the rules set so that "Once a new gw has commenced" no further changes will be applied

            1. Licious Lizard (delete acc)
              8 years, 3 months ago

              As I wrote above in a differen thread I disagree with these.
              They have to apply the same rules to every GW or it would become way to arbitrary.
              Either don’t do it at all or do it every GW (not possible) imo

              1. potatoace
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 14 Years
                8 years, 3 months ago

                You've missed my point again. I'm not saying an exception should be made in this instance I'm saying the original rules could have easily been " Once a new gw commences" .
                It's not that tricky , they just couldn't be added.

                1. potatoace
                  • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                  • 14 Years
                  8 years, 3 months ago

                  *couldn't be arsed

                2. Licious Lizard (delete acc)
                  8 years, 3 months ago

                  Yeah good point, they could change the rules to that, although I don’t know their reasoning behind this.
                  But the rules are like this at this point, why everyone should make an argument for a rule change then - instead of complaining that they won’t get their Kane points.
                  Kane captainer myself

        2. _Make
          • 9 Years
          8 years, 3 months ago

          What if he waited a week to appeal? What if people need to know how many points in front of their rivals they are before taking hits. it's way, way more complicated than just reallocating points.

          1. Leaf
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 16 Years
            8 years, 3 months ago

            The goal should not of been taken off Kane in the first place

            1. Licious Lizard (delete acc)
              8 years, 3 months ago

              Perhaps not, but the discussion is whether they can/should change it at this point

            2. _Make
              • 9 Years
              8 years, 3 months ago

              Course it should! There was no evidence he touched it! There still isn't!

            3. lespaul
              • 16 Years
              8 years, 3 months ago

              Not 'have'

              1. Leaf
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 16 Years
                8 years, 3 months ago

                Life ‘get’

          2. potatoace
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 14 Years
            8 years, 3 months ago

            They didn't wait a week though. This argument is immaterial in this instance. As explained the rules could easily be " Once a new gw commences no other changes will be applied."

    2. potatoace
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      In short, they can't be arsed
      It's not impossible to retro fix it, particularly as a new gw hasn't commenced yet.

      1. BobB
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 16 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        Better to do the right thing than do the wrong thing in the right time

        1. potatoace
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          8 years, 3 months ago

          That's a Dr John song innit.

  19. La Roja
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    I want points... any!

    1. FPL Blow-In
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Pub?

      1. La Roja
        • 14 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        in

    2. _Make
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      How does points look on a +8? Shall I pull the trigger, yay ir nay?

  20. _Make
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    I want my Pedro Mendes points!

  21. FPL Blow-In
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Hopefully Lukaku will go mental this weekend and be his usual troll self!

  22. irfanm66
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Thanks Premier League of robbing me of my captain's point !!!!!....you really aspire against me to have a low scoring GW...

    1. lespaul
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Conspire

      1. irfanm66
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        hehehe..

  23. FPL ZB
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    The replies on FPL twitter seem calm and calculated..

    1. OldBenKenobi
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      I can only imagine

  24. _Make
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    #JusticeforWestGermany66

    1. Forza
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      I'm still waiting for my Tilkowski baps.

  25. OldBenKenobi
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Oooooh...so you can deduct points for a yellow card AFTER a match has finished but not give points for a goal decision after!

    Why I outta.....

    😆

    1. lespaul
      • 16 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Oughta , not outta

  26. LosBlancos
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Can someone explain to us why are the rules such that FPL won't reflect PL decisions?
    That's just silly, can someone start a new FPL where they would? I'd sign up for that one

    1. _Make
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Is this a wind-up ;)?

    2. Licious Lizard (delete acc)
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Way too complicated to enforce this.

      Head-to-head games, leagues etc.
      And what about if it happened in one of those GW, where there is only 1 day between GW’s? Would they have to retrospectively alter tournaments, knockout rounds etc?
      Among other reasons...
      Not possible

      1. LosBlancos
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        It's completely possible, just extra work. I think they earn enough money to do this, don't be silly

        1. Licious Lizard (delete acc)
          8 years, 3 months ago

          What about in a few weeks when there is only 1 day between gameweeks and knock-outs in head-to-head tournaments are decided by this. Should they go back and change everything in these tournaments as well based on a decision a week after?
          Nothing to do with money, so don’t be silly......

          1. lespaul
            • 16 Years
            8 years, 3 months ago

            They don't take back rescinded red cards

          2. Rupert The Horse
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 13 Years
            8 years, 3 months ago

            Exactly. It’s fine how it is.

  27. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Please help me choose. 2nd on my ML. :

    A) 09 DGW players and BB in 34 with TC Kane in 37
    B) 13 DGW players and BB in 37 with TC Lukaku in 34

    Thank a lot!

    1. elwardio
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      B for me, providing you are not taking extra hits before 37

      1. DARK SIDE OF THE LOON
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 3 months ago

        Staking two to get thirteen on the pitch.

  28. jurgenizer | TRIPEIROS
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    I want my Kane (C) Goal!

  29. Delph & Safety
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Salah Aubameyang Son
    Sanchez Kane L Cook
    -4

    I’m tempted but it’s not right is it??

    1. Rash
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 3 months ago

      Keep salah

  30. Je suis le chat
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 3 months ago

    Have I not seen that picture of the greedy/odious Harold before. Is he gone a bit beefy/buff, which might be negating his goalscoring prowess?