Team News
28 August 2018 3422 comments
Skonto Rigga Skonto Rigga
Share:

Part two of our Line-Up Lessons assesses the teamsheets and formations of the remaining ten Premier League clubs’ opening matches. Part one of this feature can be found here.

Manchester United set up with three centre-backs – one of them Ander Herrera – for the defeat to Spurs, who abandoned their own 3-5-2 system to roll out a four-man defence.

Pep Guardiola was another to temporarily shelve the wing-back system for the trip to Wolves, with Kyle Walker and Raheem Sterling getting recalls to the Manchester City starting XI.

Liverpool were unchanged for the third match in a row – but Jurgen Klopp’s words hinted that rotation might just be around the corner.

Leicester City

Starting XI (4-2-3-1): Schmeichel; Amartey, Morgan, Maguire, Chilwell; Mendy, Ndidi; Pereira, Maddison (Ghezzal 78′), Gray (Okazaki 88′); Iheanacho (Albrighton 67′)

  • What we saw: Claude Puel made three changes to the side that beat Wolves, with Wes Morgan ousting Jonny Evans at centre-back and Kelechi Iheanacho replacing the suspended Jamie Vardy. Ricardo Pereira was once again deployed “out of position” for the Foxes on the right wing, with Amartey brought in to play at right-back at the expense of Marc Albrighton. Nampalys Mendy continued alongside Wilfred Ndidi in midfield, with James Maddison in the hole behind Iheanacho. Demarai Gray was deployed more centrally after Iheanacho’s withdrawal, with substitute Albrighton taking up the role on the left wing.
  • What we learned: This was the second successive away match in which Pereira has played further up the park, which possibly bodes well for his FPL owners when Leicester are on the road. Amartey fails to convince at right-back, but his inclusion – as happened upon his introduction at Wolves last weekend – allows Puel to switch from a back four to a three-man backline at will, with Amartey tucking in alongside Maguire and Morgan, and Pereira and Ben Chilwell operating as wing-backs. Gray’s increasing prominence centrally is something to monitor given his budget midfielder price tag. Vardy will still be suspended for the visit of Liverpool, which could see changes at a minimum. Shinji Okazaki is back in the reckoning though, after his brief cameo at St. Mary’s on Saturday.

Current Status: Fairly unsettled
Risk Areas: Right-back, centre-back, central midfield, wingers

Liverpool

Starting XI (4-3-3): Alisson; Alexander-Arnold (Matip 89′), Gomez, van Dijk, Robertson; Milner, Keita (Henderson 67′), Wijnaldum; Salah, Firmino, Mane (Sturridge 79′)

  • What we saw: For the third match in a row, Jurgen Klopp named an unchanged Liverpool side as the Reds maintained their 100% record. James Milner and Georgino Wijnaldum’s sterling performances continue to keep Jordan Henderson out of the side, with Fabinho missing from the squad altogether. The front three was yet again comprised of Mohamed Salah, Sadio Mane and Roberto Firmino, with Daniel Sturridge replacing the ineffectual Mane with ten minutes remaining. Joel Matip’s late introduction at centre-back saw Joe Gomez move over to right-back in place of the substituted Trent Alexander-Arnold.
  • What we learned: While Liverpool’s team on paper looks like one of the more settled in the top flight, Jurgen Klopp’s words after the win over Brighton hinted at possible rotation in Gameweek 4. Mane and Firmino might be a risk after their lacklustre displays, with Xherdan Shaqiri and Sturridge possible alternatives if Klopp decides to mix things up. Fabinho and Henderson will be hoping to come into contention, with Naby Keita – substituted for Henderson in this fixture – perhaps as at risk as Milner or Wijnaldum. Matip is a contender to start at centre-back after his cameo appearance at Anfield on Saturday, which would mean Gomez either dropping out or replacing Alexander-Arnold at right-back. It would seem unlikely that Klopp will make wholesale changes, however, given the momentum that the Reds have built up after three wins and as many clean sheets. Dejan Lovren is set to remain out.

Current Status: Fairly settled
Risk Areas: Centre-back, central midfield

Manchester City

Starting XI (4-3-3): Ederson; Mendy, Laporte, Kompany, Walker; Fernandinho, Gundogan (Sane 77’), D Silva; Sterling (Mahrez 85’), Aguero, B Silva (Jesus 62’).

  • What we saw: Having defeated Huddersfield using a 3-5-2, Pep Guardiola reverted to a four-man backline for the trip to Wolves on Saturday. Kyle Walker returned to right-back with John Stones the surplus centre-half to make way, while Raheem Sterling for Gabriel Jesus was the only other alteration to the starting XI. Fernandinho once again acted as the fulcrum of the midfield with David Silva and Ilkay Gundogan ahead of him, allowing Sterling and Bernardo Silva to flank Sergio Aguero in attack. The formation though, as always, was a fluid one, with Sterling drifting centrally from the left and eventually ending up on the right flank when Gabriel Jesus was introduced. Riyad Mahrez and Leroy Sane both made late appearances on the right and left wing respectively as City pushed for a winner.
  • What we learned: Guardiola’s team selections continue to both intrigue and frustrate in equal measure, with Mahrez, Jesus and Stones’ FPL owners – among others – left cursing their luck after this latest formation switch. This was the second successive away match in which Guardiola has used a back four, but the failure to pick up three points in the West Midlands will leave the City head coach with a lot of pondering to do before the visit of Newcastle in Gameweek 4. The Magpies’ ultra-defensive approach in the defeat to Chelsea on Sunday will encourage Guardiola to perhaps unleash both Jesus and Aguero together next weekend, with plenty of creativity needed to unpick their visitors’ five-strong defence. Gundogan and Bernardo Silva have started all three of City’s matches so far but could be at risk of rotation next time, given that they were replaced in the second half at Molineux. As ever, though, second-guessing Guardiola is a mug’s game.

Current Status: Fairly unsettled
Risk Areas: Central defence, attacking midfield, wingers

Manchester United

Starting XI (3-5-2): De Gea; Jones (Lindelof 58’), Smalling, Herrera (Sanchez 55’); Shaw, Fred, Matic (Fellaini 61’), Pogba, Valencia; Lingard, Lukaku

  • What we saw: As he did for Spurs’ visit last season, Jose Mourinho rolled out a 3-5-2 formation for the match at Old Trafford last night. Chris Smalling and Phil Jones replaced Victor Lindelof and Eric Bailly at centre-half and were joined by Ander Herrera on the right side of the back three. Nemanja Matic made his first start of the season alongside Fred and Paul Pogba in central midfield, with Jesse Lingard playing just off Romelu Lukaku in attack. Antonio Valencia also featured for the first time in 2018/19, playing on the opposite flank to Luke Shaw. Jones limped off to be replaced by Lindelof in the second half, with fellow substitutes Alexis Sanchez and Marouane Fellaini deployed on the wide left and in central midfield as Mourinho switched to a back four while chasing the game.
  • What we learned: While the scoreline shows a heavy home defeat, United’s performance up until Harry Kane’s opening goal was a positive one (albeit shaky at the back) and gives Mourinho food for thought regarding his formation for the trip to Burnley this weekend. Mourinho suggested after the game that Smalling has effectively sealed his place at centre-half, though Jones is an early injury doubt after his withdrawal. The United midfield picture now looks complete with Matic’s return, while Valencia played the whole 90 minutes at wing-back after returning from injury. With Shaw looking settled at left-back and drawing praise from his manager after full-time, however, Valencia might be sharing his pitch-time with fellow veteran Ashley Young in the short term. Sanchez will surely come back into the reckoning for the trip to Turf Moor, either alongside Lukaku in the 3-5-2 or on the left in a 4-2-3-1/4-3-3. Bailly, Juan Mata and Anthony Martial were not even among the substitutes after their poor performances against Brighton, meanwhile.

Current Status: Fairly unsettled
Risk Areas: Right-back, centre-back, attacking midfield

Newcastle United

Starting XI (5-4-1): Dubravka; Yedlin, Fernandez, Schar (Muto 79′), Clark, Dummett; Ritchie, Diame, Ki, Murphy (Perez 74′); Rondon (Joselu 62′)

  • What we saw: Rafael Benitez deviated from his customary 4-4-1-1 by rolling out an uber-cautious 5-4-1 for the visit of Chelsea, with the intention very much to frustrate their visitors by smothering their key attacking players. Benitez made six changes to the side that drew 0-0 with Cardiff City a week past Saturday, with Jamaal Lascelles and Jonjo Shelvey among the most notable omissions. Both were ruled out through injury by club and manager, though speculation mounted that at least one their absences may have been disciplinary-related. Fabian Schar and Federico Fernandez joined Ciaran Clark in central defence, with Ki Sung-yeung partnering Mohamed Diame in midfield. Salomon Rondon was the man charged with chasing down lost causes in attack, with his replacement Joselu scoring the Magpies’ equalising goal. The Magpies reverted back to a 4-4-1-1 after Chelsea’s second goal, with Schar sacrificed at the back and Yoshinori Muto being sent as a support striker. DeAndre Yedlin returned from injury to line up at right-back, meanwhile.
  • What we learned: With Manchester City away next up for the Magpies, we could very well see a similar set-up by Benitez for the trip to the Etihad: Newcastle employed conservative approaches for their meetings with City last season. The United manager could have Lascelles available for that fixture, though Shelvey’s absence might be more prolonged given Benitez’s post-match comments. Joselu will be hoping for a start after coming off the bench to score against Chelsea, while Kenedy may replace Jacob Murphy on the left wing after being ineligible to face his parent club last weekend.

Current Status: Fairly unsettled
Risk Areas: Centre-back, central midfield, striker

Southampton

Starting XI (4-4-2): McCarthy; Soares, Vestergaard, Hoedt, Bertrand; Redmond, Hojbjerg, Lemina, Elyounoussi (Romeu 79′); Long (Armstrong 86′), Ings (Austin 69′)

  • What we saw: Mark Hughes seems to have shelved a three-man backline, with the Saints manager rolling out a 4-4-2 for the second match in succession. Jannik Vestergaard returned from illness at the expense of Jack Stephens in central defence, while Pierre-Emile Hojbjerg – later to be sent off for two bookings – replaced Oriel Romeu in the engine room. Mohamed Elyounoussi returned from a hamstring strain to line up on the right wing, with Shane Long given the nod alongside Danny Ings in attack; Charlie Austin was forced to make do with a cameo appearance off the bench. Hojbjerg’s dismissal led to Elyounoussi being replaced by Romeu, with Long (and then substitute Stuart Armstrong) filling in on the right flank.
  • What we learned: Though the Saints are still winless after three matches, their performance in the defeat to Leicester offered plenty of encouragement. Hughes picked out Long, Elyounoussi, Lemina and Hojbjerg (who will serve his one-match ban in the League Cup in midweek) for praise after the match and there is every chance the Southampton side to face Crystal Palace next weekend could closely resemble the starting XI that went down to a last-minute defeat against the Foxes. Elyounoussi and Redmond offered plenty of width from the flanks, while Ings was prominent in the opposition box without getting on the scoresheet. Manolo Gabbiadini, Jan Bednarek and Maya Yoshida weren’t even included in the 18-man squad and would appear to be out of consideration for a start for the time being.

Current Status: Fairly settled
Risk Areas: Central midfield, striker

Tottenham Hotspur

Starting XI (4-2-3-1): Lloris; Rose (Davies 82’), Vertonghen, Alderweireld, Trippier (Aurier 76’); Dier, Dembele; Moura, Eriksen, Alli; Kane (Winks 89’)

  • What we saw: The three-man backline gave way to a familiar 4-2-3-1 for Spurs’ trip to Old Trafford, with Davinson Sanchez the centre-half to make way for Mousa Dembele’s inclusion in the double-pivot. Ben Davies was surprisingly omitted for Danny Rose, though both Rose and Kieran Trippier were substituted with knocks late in the second half. Lucas Moura and Dele Alli flanked Harry Kane in attack, with Christian Eriksen playing just off the England striker. Erik Lamela limped out of the warm-up and was replaced by Luke Amos on the Spurs bench.
  • What we learned: Further news is awaited on Rose and Trippier, with Davies and Serge Aurier on standby to fill in for the two England defenders at Vicarage Road this Sunday. Davies and Aurier might well have played at Watford anyway, given Mauricio Pochettino’s propensity for rotating his full-backs. Changes would appear unlikely in the front four, given their superb collective display and the fact that Lamela (hamstring) could well join Son Heung-min (Asian Games) in being unavailable for Gameweek 4. Harry Winks and Moussa Sissoko are alternative options in central midfield, should Pochettino wish to mix things up for the match against the Hornets. Given that the Spurs manager abandoned the 3-5-2 experiment midway through the win over Fulham, a 4-2-3-1/4-3-3 formation looks to be a fairly safe bet in the near future.

Current Status: Fairly settled
Risk Areas: Full-backs

Watford

Starting XI (4-4-2): Foster; Janmaat, Cathcart, Kabasele, Holebas; Hughes, Doucoure, Capoue, Pereyra; Gray (Sema 72′), Deeney (Success 90′)

  • What we saw: For the third successive match, Javi Gracia named an unchanged side as the Hornets maintained their 100% record. Roberto Pereyra and Will Hughes continued as “inverted wingers”, with Jose Holebas and Daryl Janmaat offering natural width on the overlap. As Gracia attempted to close the game out, Andre Gray was sacrificed from the two-man attack and Ken Sema was introduced on the right flank, with Will Hughes positioned just behind Troy Deeney.
  • What we learned: The Hornets’ starting XI is one of the most settled in the division and could well be unchanged for the visit of Spurs next Sunday. Nathaniel Chalobah, Gerard Deulofeu and Tom Cleverley offer different options when fit, so an update is awaited on their conditions later in the week. With Watford winning all three of their matches so far and still to fall behind in a match, we are yet to discover what Gracia’s “Plan B” is, should the effectiveness of their 4-4-2 be nullified for some reason. At the moment though, the Watford team is an FPL manager’s dream in its consistency and predictably.

Current Status: Settled
Risk Areas: Central midfield

West Ham United

Starting XI (4-2-3-1): Fabianski; Masuaku, Balbuena, Diop, Fredericks; Sanchez, Wilshere; Snodgrass (Yarmolenko 75’), Anderson, Antonio (Perez 63’); Arnautovic (Chicharito 58’)

  • What we saw: This was the third match in a row that Manuel Pellegrini has started with a different formation, with 4-2-3-1 the preferred system this time round. Issa Diop and Ryan Fredericks were brought in at centre-half and right-back respectively, while Carlos Sanchez made his debut in the double-pivot alongside Jack Wilshere. Ryan Snodgrass and Michail Antonio were given starts on the flanks, with Felipe Anderson playing centrally behind Marko Arnautovic. Both Antonio and Arnautovic were substituted with injuries in the second half, while Mark Noble missed out with a back problem.
  • What we learned: While West Ham’s shape and line-up remain unsettled, the positive nature of their performance – at least in attack – suggests that this formation is one Pellegrini could stick with for the visit of Wolves in Gameweek 3. Andriy Yarmolenko must be wondering what he has to do to get a start, though if Antonio’s injury rules him out of this weekend’s fixture then the Ukrainian will surely deputise. News is awaited on the severity of Antonio and Arnautovic’s issues, though Javier Hernandez is a natural replacement for the Austrian as the spearhead of the West Ham attack. Uncertainty continues in defence, with Pablo Zabaleta and Angelo Ogbonna dropped from the side for the trip to the Emirates. Arthur Masuaku and Fabian Balbuena, at least, have played every minute of the Hammers’ league campaign so far.

Current Status: Fairly unsettled
Risk Areas: Right-back, centre-back, central midfield, wings

Wolverhampton Wanderers

Starting XI (4-3-3): Patricio; Boly, Coady, Bennett; Jonny (Vinagre 85’), Neves, Moutinho, Doherty; Jota, Jimenez, Costa (Traore 72’).

  • What we saw: Despite fears of rotation hanging over several Wolves’ players, Nuno Espirito Santo named an unchanged starting XI for the third match in a row. Jota and Helder Costa once again flanked Raul Jimenez in attack, with Adama Traore – tipped to start in some quarters – replacing Costa in the final 20 minutes of the game. Injury doubt Matt Doherty was fit to feature on the right flank, though fellow full-back Jonny limped off to be replaced by Ruben Vinagre in the final five minutes. Ruben Neves and Joao Moutinho were once more the deep-lying pair stationed in front of Willy Boly, Conor Coady and Ryan Bennett, with Leander Dendoncker again missing from the squad of 18.
  • What we learned: The positive manner of Wolves’ performance against the reigning league champions suggests that changes will be at a premium for the trip to West Ham. The versatile Dendoncker is the medium-term threat to perhaps Bennett, given that Neves and Moutinho would seem unlikely to be deposed from central midfield, though is being eased into English football by his club – the Belgian international could make his debut in the Carabao Cup this evening. Vinagre will be on stand-by to deputise if Jonny’s injury rules him out of the match against the Hammers. Having been hooked at half-time in the defeat to Leicester, Jota and Costa were given another chance against Pep Guardiola’s side and would perhaps appear to be safe for now – but Traore is a looming threat to their starts.

Current Status: Fairly settled
Risk Areas: Centre-half, right-wing

Become a Member and access our data

Memberships for the 2018/19 campaign are now available for the price of £15.

Join now to get the following:

  • Plot your transfer strategies using the fully interactive Season Ticker.
  • Get projections for every Premier League player provided by the Rate My Team statistical model.
  • Use Rate My Team throughout the season to guide your selections and transfers.
  • Get access to over 130+ exclusive members articles over the season.
  • Analyse our OPTA-powered statistic tables specifically tailored for Fantasy Football Managers.
  • Use our exclusive tool to build custom stats tables from over 100 OPTA player and team stats.
  • View heatmaps and expected goals data for every player.
  • Use our powerful comparison tool to analyse players head-to-head.

CLICK HERE TO BECOME A FANTASY FOOTBALL SCOUT MEMBER

  1. Eze Really?
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    I think WB is the best buy so far. But at his price we will see constant bench points to frustrate. Nice to have 3 premium defenders atm which will frustrate.
    I am thinking of ditching Robbo at the Pool Spurs game and using WB constantly.
    The other way is to run 4 defenders.
    How do you guys think?

    1. Patch
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Depends where you plan to use the Robbo funds?

      1. Eze Really?
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Will use it in a few ways. 6 to 7.5 mids to the 8 to 9.5 range (Erik, Citeh, etc) or have funds for Kane

    2. Eze Really?
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Bad top post. Sorry

      1. Lone Wolf FPL
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Actually not that bad mate.

      2. Manumana
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Why is that a bad top post and why do ppl care about it anyway ? Who cares. I dont anyway. Just saying. Good post btw

    3. Mr Q
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      4-3-3

    4. bitm2007
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Confirmation that he has won his place back from Ward is required before he can be classed as more than bench fodder.

      1. Eze Really?
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        The most impressive young defender I can remember. I get your point but I would have a few bob bet.

        1. bitm2007
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 11 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          Agreed he's in my starting 11 for the weekend, but the fact that he played with the second 11 last night has got me wondering where he is in the pecking order.

      2. Ramboros
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Hodgson has already confirmed that AWB will play this weekend. Palace have added too many good bench players (Kouyaté, Ayew, Meyer, Sørloth) to their squad for Hodgson to say that unless he wants to start AWB.

      3. Son is Rising
        • 15 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        He's starting

    5. A.T
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      If Tomkins is out for a while I’d avoid Palace defence. Otherwise I think 4 atb is a very good option.

      1. Eze Really?
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        But he plays almost as advanced as Zaha.

        1. A.T
          • 15 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          He needs clean sheets imo. If you go 4atb and play him every week, you need to be sure about it first, otherwise major surgery is required. I’ve only seen him myself a few times and even though he appears much better than Ward, Hodgson always seems to end up preferring the latter. Granted that may have changed this season but still I’d want CS points coming in too, otherwise you’re using up a spot just because it appears value when in reality it might not turn out to be.

          1. Eze Really?
            • 11 Years
            7 years, 7 months ago

            I think Palace will get clean sheets. The surgery I agree but 4 at the back with him is better than a low priced enabler forward. Sometime the psychology runs the other way, not wanting to play him due to price.

      2. Third Eye Vision
        • 13 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Yeah. They looked much weaker at the weekend without Tomkins and AWB. I also think Tomkins might be key to their defensive strength.

        1. A.T
          • 15 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          Majorly key.

    6. Man Getting Hit By Football
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Nothing wrong with having 3 premium defenders & AWB if you think they will all score well. He is massively underpriced. I'm playing him this week.

    7. Lone Wolf FPL
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Good thinking.
      I think that I need to use WB somehow - as 3rd def or swap to 4 at the back like you said. That would give me a chance to get some big gun.

      1. Lone Wolf FPL
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        But right now Ive got Gunnarsson and Peltier so WB is perfect as first on the bench.

  2. Patch
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    We need a detailed summary of the games last night

    Please kindly provide!

    1. A.T
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Most players were rested.

      1. Patch
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        If Arnie played that would have been amazing

        Do wonder if he 100% features in GW4

        Saw Ogbana scored!

        1. A.T
          • 15 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          He’s going for a scan today I think I saw. Hopefully the presser will say more.

        2. Eze Really?
          • 11 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          Hi did not

          1. Patch
            • 8 Years
            7 years, 7 months ago

            Diop and Hernandez also scored alongside Ogbonna

    2. Loftus cheeky nandos
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Most prem clubs played second sides, just to warn u

      1. Patch
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Hmm still worth a big write up, for example appreciate Sorloth scored last night for Crystal but it should be a nugget of info that AWB also played...

        Is he now a second rate citizen that we should be mindful of?

  3. A.T
    • 15 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    I’ve either already got or don’t like the Richarlison replacements. Should I go for a 2 week punt until Richarlison returns or keep him and play Bennett (whu, BUR)?

    1. captainjilflex
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      my problem with keeping him is potential points lost as dont have a reliable back up. So im going lucas to get spurs cover and replace his points (hopefully)

      1. A.T
        • 15 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Lucas would require a hit for me, plus losing a another wanted player and I’m not keen on that but points lost is the dilemma.

        1. captainjilflex
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 8 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          ill be taking a hit aswell but think its worth it. by the time i regret my decision itll be wc time anyway! but arnies injury is holding me up right now. that could really throw a spanner in the works.

    2. WVA
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Surely a two week punt on Wally with those fixtures is worth it

  4. RedMarks 赤的
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Salah + Peltier + Richarlison --> Hazard + Alonso + Walcott (-8)
    Mad one?

    1. A.T
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Not really. 3 decent players against one wins every time.

      1. Ruth_NZ
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Does it? Would you put it past Salah to get 15+ points in GW6? He'll be widely captained that week, the clear best option. If he does go big and you don't have him at all then you will be struggling.

        I say this as someone that wanted to lose Salah this week as well. But the stats so far just don't support it really.

        1. A.T
          • 15 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          Obviously it doesnt win every time but I think in principal 3 is better than one. I also agree about Salah, I also tended to drop him early doors and that now seems unwise. However, he could also bring him in and out if the rest of the team looks ok. Not something I would do but each to their own.

          1. Ruth_NZ
            • 11 Years
            7 years, 7 months ago

            Yeah, the Salah HOHO looks feasible this season because with such a high starting ownership and valuation, his price won't run away like it did last year. The problem is transfers. If you don't invest the money saved by losing Salah it's counter-productive. So removing him and re-investing is 2 transfers and then reversing that is 2 more transfers.

            Plan it very well and/or couple it with a wildcard and it's possible. But you'd need to time it right and not get any other problems (injuries, suspensions) intervening.

    2. Bocaginge
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Yeah you’re relying on a lot of luck going your way to recoup the -8 points hit. Can you afford just to swap Rich for Walcott? Or Pedro instead?

    3. Eze Really?
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Next week -4 with Richi to Wally now

    4. Bggz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      i woudlnt

  5. Bocaginge
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Thoughts on Bilva & King out for Pedro & Arnie (if declared fit or Zaha if Arnie doesn’t make it off the treatment table)

    1. Third Eye Vision
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      I wouldn’t do those moves.

    2. samaael
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      I think bilva is a keeper atm. King can go

      1. Bocaginge
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Bilva has done little of note in the first 3 games and is a high rotation risk after his second half subbing at the weekend. The stats don’t look that favourable on him so far whereas Pedro is ticking all the boxes. Do you guys think Bilva is likely to turn it around going forward or do you just think he’s worth keeping because he plays for City?

  6. TheNovocastrian
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Thanks folks, seems like I'll be saving my TC this week...

    1. TheNovocastrian
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Posted on wrong page/thread.

  7. Dacra
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Tempted by a Firmino captain, but don't think I'm brave enough over Salah..

    1. Dacra
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Or Aguero..

    2. Zilla
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Question should be why are you tempted.. you should be shipping out not capping him! ;D

    3. Khark
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Firm is due a big one, problem is how deep he is

  8. balint84
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    A) save King no transfer
    B) buy Jimenez, sell King, save money
    C) drop Agüero to Kane

    1. Werkself
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      A

    2. SuperKante
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      A

    3. Goat
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      C

      1. DeathoftheParty
        • 9 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Lol at this sabotage

  9. penno09
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Fab
    AWB PVA Robertson Mendy
    Salah Mane Walcott B Silva
    Aguero(c) Zaha

    Bench: Foster, Ings, Fraser, Peltier

    G2G?

    1. samaael
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      looks fine. I would be looking to get hazard in

  10. Gianfranco Zola
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Play one:

    A) Shaw (bur)
    B) Wan-Bissaka (SOU)

    1. A.T
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      B

    2. Jebiga
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      both 🙂

  11. Loftus cheeky nandos
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Best strikers for 5.0-5.7 mill?

    1. Dacra
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Ings or Jiminez.

    2. Eze Really?
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Wolves/Soton

  12. Mackans
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Draft: Özil -> Sigurdsson?

    1. A.T
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Yes

  13. Mackans
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Do you think Özil won't play in the next matches?

    1. GOTHAM City F.C.
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Think he might, but why would you even bother with him.

  14. Ronnies
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    G2G for GW 4 ?

    ederson
    mendy - robo - alonso
    salah - mane - mkhi - walcott
    aguero (c) - zaha - ings

    bench; hamer - wan bissaka - westwood - bennett

    Any feedback appreciated.
    Thanks guys.

    1. Werkself
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      GTG. WC team?

    2. Reiko
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Template team around here. Have 10 of those players in my team.

  15. Jebiga
    • 13 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    All FPL players on this site have Mendy, Robo and Alonso but no Hazard...
    How is that possible ?

    1. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Because they cant afford him with that backline, Salah and Kun

    2. samaael
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      ive sacrificed Alonso to get hazard

    3. waldo666
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      I don't have Robbo or Alonso, I do however have Hazard.

    4. Reiko
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Slowly Hazard is being introduced into their teams, mostly at the expense of Mane

      1. The 12th Man
        • 12 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Expense of Aubameyang here

    5. The 12th Man
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      I have Hazard but TAA in place of Robertson. Could easily get him though if I downgraded Periera

      1. GreennRed
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Pereyra? I have Pereira and Pereyra. Too cool for the school 😉

        1. The 12th Man
          • 12 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          Sweet.The a Leicester full back.
          Sitting on my bench waiting for Leicester good fix.

          1. GreennRed
            • 14 Years
            7 years, 7 months ago

            Leicester full back, ex winger / utility player 🙂

            As Paul Simon used to say 'You can call me (casu)Al!

            1. The 12th Man
              • 12 Years
              7 years, 7 months ago

              Lol.
              “I am a rock!”

    6. GreennRed
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      I have Hazard, Mendy, Alonso on reluctant WC but no Pool.

    7. Demel
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      I have all 4.

      1. GreennRed
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Who have you up front pray tell?

  16. Nezwolf
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    A or B?

    A. Mane to Hazard (free)
    B. Save FT, then downgrade Mane and transfer Lowton to Alonso next week for free? (alt. Push this through this week for -4)

    I'm keen to get in on chelsea's good fixtures and seem to be in good form - Liverpool have a tough run coming up and Burnley defence does not look as strong as last year,

    Suggestions and much appreciated!

    1. samaael
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      a

    2. Eze Really?
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Burnley injuries, small squad and Europe will have a negative impact

  17. Mr Q
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Why didnt Schürrle start the season?

    He will surely start from now on right?

    1. Demel
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Match fitness. Fulham will rotate a lot. He won't play every week. Especially away to the big clubs.

      1. Mr Q
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Alright, thanks!

        Looking for a good sub 6m to replace richa (and enable an upgrade pva-Mendy)

        Is fraser the only one to turn to? As 4th mid

        1. GreennRed
          • 14 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          Neves might be a good shout or even Milner. Wolves create loads of chances. Some game soon they're gonna rip some team.

          1. Mr Q
            • 10 Years
            7 years, 7 months ago

            Already 3 pool players..

            Neves is an interesting shout.. not comvinced yet though.. thanks anyway!

            1. GreennRed
              • 14 Years
              7 years, 7 months ago

              Same here, looks too inconsistent and not attack-minded enough just yet. I got Pereyra, tough fixtures for nex5 few weeks but gets forward a lot for that price.

    2. Werkself
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      He did start the season. Played 60 min. in GW1, late sub in GW 2.

      1. Werkself
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        *brought on as

      2. Mr Q
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        But still risk for rotation right?

        1. Werkself
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          Think so. He was my GW 1 differential and I sent him packing last week. I'd choose Fraser now if I wanted a

  18. samaael
    • 15 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Ryan
    Mendy/ WanB/ TAA
    Salah/ Hazard/ Bilva/ Pedro
    Aguero/ Mitrovic/ Iheanacho

    4.0/ Tomkins/ Tarkowsky/ Stephens

    1.5TB 0FT

    take Nacho out for a hit?

    1. Mr Q
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Nay

  19. 328345
    • 9 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Fab

    Luiz Alonso VVD Mendy
    Salah Eriksen Mhiki Gundo
    Aguero Ings

    (Pat, WB, Kamara, Richalison)

    Already made my transfers so double chelsea def will do for this week, Luiz will become a 5.0 def next week.
    My question is..... ings or wb to start?

  20. Patch
    • 8 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Anyone else with an OR Top 1k thinking of ditching Mane to bring in Hazard?

    Alternatively ditch VVD for Morata?

    Feel like I need to drop a Liverpool and bring a Chelsea in...

    1. 420king
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      What an exclusive conversation. *gets popcorn*

      1. 420king
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Shhh the elitists are talking.

        1. Pap Le Cissier
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          😆

        2. GreennRed
          • 14 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          An OR top K rank after 3 GW 🙂

        3. Patch
          • 8 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          Lol didn't mean it like that

          Just those at the top play conservatively so need like minded peers

          If I was in the millions (like I rightfully should) I would be playing gung go

          Therefore just need a different niche opinion, cheers thow!

          1. Werkself
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 12 Years
            7 years, 7 months ago

            Many at the top right now have played 3 chips, so ...

            1. Patch
              • 8 Years
              7 years, 7 months ago

              That I will 100% not follow

              Strongly believe in keeping the chips, would also like to enter the IB with hopefully 2FT...but I think realistically I need to start making small transfers to set up a Hazard entry

              For example, I may downgrade VVD now

              Then with 2FT in IB I can bring Hazard in with the money ITB

          2. Mr Q
            • 10 Years
            7 years, 7 months ago

            Then you should ask advice of people of managers finishing a season top 1k...

    2. Pap Le Cissier
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Well I’ve just slipped outside that but I’ll answer anyway! 😀

      I’d drop pool defence myself but don’t think it’s worth losing Mane yet

      1. Patch
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Ok thanks need a crystal ball to see if Liverpool get constrained over the coming weeks

        Would love.to know which Chelsea asset goes insane

    3. Mr Q
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Not too many will answer that 😉

      1. GreennRed
        • 14 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        If they did they'd have their team linked.

      2. Patch
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        I'm ignoring the silly little transfer decisions to focus on the pivotal decision making (i.e Liverpool Vs Chelsea)

        Strongly believe this decision will make or break the ranks

    4. Jam0sh
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Two years ago I would have been able to answer this question

    5. Eze Really?
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Sorry Patch. Did not see your post. I would not have if i had seen it. See below.

    6. Smurf
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Ranks mean nothing at this stage. Most of the top 10k now will be no where near the top 10k by then end of the season.

      I finished 384th the season before last and I was no where near the top 10k until about Christmas time.

      1. Jam0sh
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Yep. Nevertheless it makes no harm to be well placed already if you know what you're doing

      2. Patch
        • 8 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        But is not fair to say you are taking risky gung hi decisions to make ground

        Whereas those with a high OR focus on durex (i.e. protection) and moving conservatively

        1. Smurf
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 16 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          I’m currently ranked 400k and will still make the same moves I would if in the top 1k. I don’t need to take “risky gung ho” decisions at all. I have nothing to catch up because it’s not yet a true reflection of where I stand and who the top 1k are.

          1. Patch
            • 8 Years
            7 years, 7 months ago

            Ok fair enough, re-reading the post I can see it might run off the wrong way

            I am not trying to differentiate myself from the masses but just thought maybe those with a High OR play with a different mindset (which I am not accustomed to).

            Perhaps those with a High OR prefer to stay snuggly and warm with Salah, whereas I still have last season's mindset of "what the hell"...which perhaps I need to adapt

            But I take on board the comments, it's too soon to behave like this, perhaps if I still have a good OR say around DGW then I should play with Durex

            1. Smurf
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 16 Years
              7 years, 7 months ago

              Yeah if you are well ranked by say February you may want to be conservative and play steady even more so. For now just play the game how you feel best. You shouldn’t take any unnecessary risks at this stage where ever you are ranked. Play safe and you will stay ranked high rather than fall with a lot of the other current top 1k.

  21. Haggis
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Bench 1:
    A) Ings (cry)
    B) Kante (BOU)

    1. samaael
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      b

    2. Jayv807
      • 9 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      B

  22. kysersosa
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    When are people looking at using their WC? Currently looking at GW 6.

  23. The 12th Man
    • 12 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Planning on losing TAA to fund Fraser > Moura/ Rich in a few weeks?
    Good idea?
    Defence, Mendy,Alonso,TAA,Periera,AWB

    1. A.T
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Keep him this week

  24. Eze Really?
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Extra .8 mil for Haz. More if you swap. Is it worth it over Mane?
    They score points at very similar rates and nothing says it won't happen this year. I would like to have both but hard to do with Salah and Kun in the side.
    Fixtures say move but not much else.
    What are others doing?

    1. The 12th Man
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Never owned Mane myself, don’t think I’d move over yet if I had.
      I’ve moved for Hazard as my Richarlison replacement though.

      1. Eze Really?
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Thinking more for those doing the Mane/Haz switch

    2. GreennRed
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Hazard should be Chelsea's dominant attacker with not a whole lot of competition for attacking points. When Salah and Firmino are up to speed Mane will be swilling from the attacking trough with them, plus Winaldum, Keita, Robertson, possibly Shaqiri. A bit like having a City attacking prospect, goals and assists can come from a number of sources but at Chelsea Hazard looks a better bet.

      1. Eze Really?
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Agreed. Rotation a risk too.

    3. kawaiii
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Hazard in. Main man in a very attacking team. Possibly last season at Chelsea. Just look at the output in the past 3 weeks with limited game time. Fixtures also good.

      1. Eze Really?
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        I see the argument. But would you switch if you had Mane? Seems a little sideways judging on history for both.

    4. Patch
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Do we know the last point at which Hazard could move to another team

      If he is guaranteed to stay, then I may be swayed...

      1. Eze Really?
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        I am waiting until transfer deadline just in case

  25. Where has all the rum gone?
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    i took a hit to bring alonso in. should i take another hit to ship out rich for someone say either walcott/pedro/mkhi/fraser?

    1. Holmes
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Depends if you can bench him or not

    2. Werkself
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      I would if I were you.

    3. kawaiii
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Yes, 6.6 on your bench will hurt. Also he will be 6.4 soon.
      Fixtures favour Walcott, but long term I prefer Miki.

    4. Where has all the rum gone?
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      i can afford to bench him and switch to a 433 formation with 2 playing subs. however.... the thought of a 6.6 sitting on the bench is not quiet ideal.

      am favoring wally over mkhi. only because i have an arsenal cover but no Everton. not forgetting the problem with wally is that....he tends to pull up last min with some small injuries, i dnt think he will be any different this season.

  26. Ronnies
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Play 1 ?

    A) Ings - away to crystal palace

    B) wan bissaka - home to southampton

    Thanks.

    1. Where has all the rum gone?
      • 7 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      b

    2. samaael
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      b don't see saints scoring

      1. Jam0sh
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        Then Ings goes and scores

    3. dbeck
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 8 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      B if Tomkins starts. If not then A

    4. KANEGAROO
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      A - more threats to gain more points

  27. ramzieibrahim
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    wild card team
    ederson hamer
    awb alonso robbo mendy bennet
    neves hazard salah moura masuaku
    aguero zaha vietto
    0.1 in the bank
    please advise changes

    1. Son is Rising
      • 15 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      You'll hate yourself with Neves starting each week.

      1. ramzieibrahim
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        what about hughes or kante ???

        1. Son is Rising
          • 15 Years
          7 years, 7 months ago

          Kante is an interesting one. His record is terrible (from an FPL perspective) but he is getting in great positions under Sarri. His finishing is pretty shocking though.

    2. KANEGAROO
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      i'd change masuaku to someone else

  28. KANEGAROO
    • 11 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    Hi lads! G2G for GW 4?
    Already used 1FT to bring in Walcott for Richarlison (suspended)
    ITB 0,2

    Etheridge (Hamer)
    Mendy Alonso Robertson (AWB Stankovic)
    Mane Hazard (vc) D.Silva Walcott
    Zaha Mitrovic Aguero (c)

    And also what if to use Triple captain on Kun this GW?

  29. Puntman93
    • 7 Years
    7 years, 7 months ago

    will wan bissaka play? played mid week, that suggests to me ward will be given another shot?

    1. KANEGAROO
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      hope that he'll play

    2. OPTA FPL
      • 14 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      or Ward is so rubbish that shouldnt be even used in the cup = WB nailed for the season?

    3. Andy_Social
      • 13 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      I think WB played because he had a rest at the weekend. I'm happy having him in my Starting XI this w/e.

    4. Eze Really?
      • 11 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      I wax lyrical about him being the best young defender in the PL. It is a no risk choice at his price and will end up a stayer in my 1st 11 I think.

    5. Hotdogs for Tea
      • 10 Years
      7 years, 7 months ago

      any one that needs to rely upon playng W-B will convince themselves he will start on the weekend 😉

  30. majishun
      7 years, 7 months ago

      Would you swap Chelsea's Kante or Jorghino for Will Hughes at Watford?

      1. ᶠᶦˡᵗʰʸLucre $$$
        • 11 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        No

      2. Werkself
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        If I needed to find funds I would. I think he's good value.

      3. Hotdogs for Tea
        • 10 Years
        7 years, 7 months ago

        have you seen Watrord's fixtures ?