Scout Squad
11 March 2021 325 comments
Skonto Rigga Skonto Rigga
Share:

The Scout Squad panel reconvenes to champion the best players for Gameweek 28, which is the first ‘non-double’ Gameweek in over a month.

Only three Fantasy assets get unanimous backing this week, which is a reflection of the tough-to-call nature of the fixtures.

For those new to this feature, Fantasy Football Scout editor David, deputy editor Neale, video content manager Andy and Pro Pundit Tom each put forward an 18-man long-list of players and explain their notable inclusions and omissions below.

The assets listed will then be narrowed down to a squad of 15 (with the starting XI not exceeding a total cost of £83.0m) for the weekly Scout Picks selection ahead of the FPL deadline at 18:30 GMT on Friday.

In each writer’s squad, there are requirements for at least:

  • One goalkeeper costing £5.0m or less
  • One sub-£5.0m defender
  • One midfielder listed at £6.5m or below
  • One forward priced at £7.5m or lower

Each panelist is also restricted to no more than three players from the same team, as is the case in FPL.

We will again be adding a captaincy to the Scout Picks, with details of that revealed on Friday.

DavidNealeTomAndy
GKEdersonEmiliano MartinezJordan PickfordEmiliano Martínez
Edouard MendyVicente GuaitaEmiliano MartínezSam Johnstone
Alphonse AreolaJordan PickfordSam JohnstoneJordan Pickford
DFLucas DigneLucas DigneLucas DigneRúben Dias
Joao CanceloJoao CanceloJoão CanceloLucas Digne
Ainsley Maitland-NilesRicardo PereiraLuke ShawLuke Shaw
Cesar AzpilicuetaCesar AzpilicuetaAntonio RüdigerTrent Alexander-Arnold
Joel VeltmanKyle BartleyAinsley Maitland-NilesDaniel Amartey
MFGareth BaleBruno FernandesBruno FernandesBruno Fernandes
Pierre-Emerick AubameyangGareth BaleKevin De BruyneKevin De Bruyne
Son Heung-minMason MountSon Heung-minGareth Bale
Mason MountPedro NetoMason MountMason Mount
Pedro NetoAnwar El GhaziYouri TielemansBertrand Traoré
FWHarry KaneHarry KaneHarry KaneTimo Werner
Gabriel JesusRicharlisonDominic Calvert-LewinHarry Kane
RicharlisonTimo WernerOllie WatkinsRicharlison
Ollie WatkinsKelechi IheanachoMbaye DiagneOllie Watkins
Mbaye DiagneMbaye DiagneKelechi IheanachoJamie Vardy

Most popular picks: Lucas Digne, Mason Mount, Harry Kane (four), Emiliano Martínez, Jordan Pickford, Joao Cancelo, Bruno Fernandes, Gareth Bale, Richarlison, Ollie Watkins, Mbaye Diagne (three)

DAVID SAID

I trust Manchester City’s defence more than I trust their attack in Gameweek 28. That’s largely on account of Alphonse Areola‘s form of late, with Fulham conceding just one goal or fewer every match from Gameweek 23 onwards.

The Citizens’ own backline remains the most productive this season while Fulham have blanked in two of their last three outings; hence the inclusion of Ederson and Ruben Dias.

Lucas Digne looks a good shout for Gameweek 28 considering Burnley’s own troubles in front of goal this season, especially on the road. Only Sheffield United (six) have scored fewer away goals than the Clarets (eight) thus far while Gylfi Sigurdsson is the only Everton player to have created more chances than Digne over the last four.

Ainsley Maitland-Niles continues to operate in a midfield role and ranks second among West Bromwich Albion players for touches in the final third over the last four matches. During that same period, the Baggies have three clean sheets and Crystal Palace have blanked twice.

Finally, Joel Veltman is top among all defenders for expected goal involvement over the last four matches, a period in which Southampton have netted three goals and failed to score on two occasions.

Gareth Bale is looking like an increasingly viable asset, even if Jose Mourinho is going to manage his minutes. The Welshman has produced two double-figure hauls in the last three and is already forming an effective partnership with Harry Kane, who sits top of the league for shots in the box and second for shots on target among all players during their last four outings.

Over the same period, Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang is second only to Kane for minutes per expected goal involvement (xGI).

Richarlison looks set to benefit from Burnley’s recent struggles. The Clarets have the third-worst expected goals conceded (xGC) over the last four matches while Everton’s Brazilian forward is top among his colleagues for shots in the box, big chances and shots on target.

NEALE SAID

With this entry being written on Thursday morning, there are some selections that make the cut based on midweek breathers (Joao Cancelo, Mason Mount) and others (Gareth Bale) whose inclusion may well hinge on how many minutes they are afforded in the UEFA Europa League.

Form is even more paramount than usual in this week of middling fixtures.

Cesar Azpilicueta has that in spades, as he averages 6.7 points per match since Thomas Tuchel was made manager. He’s the only Chelsea player who hasn’t had a benching since Tuchel took over and while that could well mean a breather is just around the corner, he is trusted implicitly by the German and reportedly accompanies his boss to meetings with match officials. On top of significant clean sheet potential, he has supplied 11 chances from centre-back since the change in head coach, evoking memories of his time under Antonio Conte.

Azpilicueta’s teammate Mason Mount sits in the top ten midfielders for shots and chances created since Tuchel’s appointment, so offers all-round appeal further forward.

Pedro Neto has been posting near-identical figures to Mount in terms of goal threat and assist potential from Gameweek 20 onwards, so I’ve included the Wolves man against a Liverpool defence that still has plenty of questions to answer on the domestic front.

Anwar El Ghazi is expected back from injury for the trip to Newcastle, who have conceded more chances from their right flank than any other club in their last six matches. With Jack Grealish still sidelined, the left-wing berth should be El Ghazi’s to reclaim. A trigger-happy winger whose radar is sometimes a bit misaligned, El Ghazi has the best minutes-per-shot average of any FPL midfielder who has made more than two starts this season.

Leicester City aren’t in great shape but, on paper, they have the best fixture of the weekend – Sheffield United at home. The ‘out of position’ potential of Ricardo Pereira keeps me interested in the Portuguese full-back despite poor recent returns, while I’ve opted for Kelechi Iheanacho over Jamie Vardy in attack. Those two forwards have started the last three matches together, with Iheanacho outperforming his strike partner by two goals to nil and by nine shots to two.

Finally, I can see little in the way of goalmouth action at Selhurst Park this weekend, so Kyle Bartley gets the nod as my budget defender pick,. The Baggies are in decent defensive nick and the Palace backline has allowed more headed attempts and set-piece chances than any other club in their last six matches, so Bartley – who has three goals to his name already this season – could prosper at both ends of the pitch.

TOM SAID…

I’ve doubled up on Everton’s defence this week ahead of Saturday’s home game against Burnley. Carlo Ancelotti’s side have given up just two goals in their last four and prior to Monday’s defeat at Stamford Bridge had kept three consecutive clean sheets. Goalkeeper Jordan Pickford has put in some quality displays of late, and I’m expecting Lucas Digne to take control of his flank and collect points at both ends of the pitch.

West Bromwich Albion also get a defensive double-up from me, via Sam Johnstone and Ainsley Maitland-Niles. The Baggies have proved difficult to break down in recent matches and take on a Crystal Palace side who often struggle in front of goal. It’s another relegation six-pointer, which is why I’ve also included Mbaye Diagne, who is getting chances but must improve his conversion rate.

Rounding off the backline is goalkeeper Emiliano Martínez, who continues his quest for the Golden Glove at Newcastle United, plus defenders João Cancelo, Luke Shaw and Antonio Rüdiger.

Further forward, Bruno Fernandes, Son Heung-min and Harry Kane’s inclusion needs little explanation, so I’ll focus on some of my other picks.

While the emergence of Kai Havertz is exciting, Mason Mount feels like the safer midfield option having been handed a break on Monday night. The England international has established himself as a key player under Thomas Tuchel and should return to the starting XI at Leeds United, a match I see him thriving in.

Meanwhile, Manchester City saw their 21-game winning streak end last weekend, with Kevin De Bruyne uncharacteristically misplacing several passes. However, his creativity numbers on the day suggest he was unfortunate not to return as he ended the match as his team’s biggest expected goal involvement (xGI) underachiever. Sure enough, he was back among the points in midweek.

For a team missing some of their biggest attacking threats, I thought Leicester City did okay at Brighton and Hove Albion in Gameweek 27. Jamie Vardy has scored just once in his last 11 league games but Kelechi Iheanacho is now producing the goals to fill the void, and has probably shown enough to keep his place. Youri Tielemans has been doing a lot of good work in the final third too, and as I’m expecting a routine home win, an attacking double-up feels fine.

The forward line is completed by Dominic Calvert-Lewin and Ollie Watkins.

ANDY SAID

I’ve not yet completely given up on Liverpool. Although their defence has been breachable recently, they are playing a Wolves side in the bottom five for shots in the box over the last six matches. In that same time, Trent Alexander-Arnold has created 13 chances and had nine shots.

I’m willing to take a risk on Gareth Bale this week. I still have some doubts about his starts, and we can see that his minutes are being managed, but he’s doing a lot of good stuff with the game-time he is getting. Since Gameweek 24, when he came back into the side for 18 minutes against Man City, he’s had seven shots in the box in just 271 minutes. That’s four more than Son Heung-min has had in 450 minutes. Son is the safer play, but Bale looks better for goals at the moment.

It feels wrong to back against Dominic Calvert-Lewin given the season he’s had but it’s difficult to look past Richarlison’s recent numbers. Between Gameweeks 25-27, he’s had eight shots in the box compared to Calvert-Lewin’s four (in 57 fewer minutes). He’s also doubled his total number of shots (10 v 5). It does feel like more of a Calvert-Lewin game but we know that Carlo Ancelotti has come out and said he’s sacrificed his position in favour of Richarlison, which is why I’ve backed him.

325 Comments Login to Post a Comment
  1. Eastman
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Sterling to
    A. Keep this week
    B. Mahrez (have Gundo)
    C. Auba (week 29 in mind)
    D. Bale (have Son)
    Thanks

    1. aleksios
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      A.

    2. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      A - Looking at Sterling's previous starts, he hasn't been benched for 2 games in a row since GW19 including cup games. He should start but I can see he is frustrating to own

      1. Super Sharpe Shooter
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        I owned Sterling for weeks ahead of DGW26 and got so sick of him wasting chances I binned him for Mahrez. Yes he probably plays v Fulham and yes he's capable of a hat-trick at any given moment but it feels like that's been said for too long now. The evidence right in front of our eyes is that Auba and Bale are the right picks at the moment.

  2. Tonyawesome69
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    With 2FTs between GW28-29, which options would you priorities for GW29?

    A. Holding to Dallas
    B. Salah to Auba
    C. DCL to Antonio
    D. Barnes to Bale

    WC31 FH33

    1FT 2.6itb
    Martinez
    Cancelo Stones Digne Cresswell
    Gundo Raphinha Son Salah
    Kane DCL
    (Fabri Bamford Holding Barnes)

    1. aleksios
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      A.

      1. Tonyawesome69
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        Only Dallas out of those options?

        1. Eastman
          • 8 Years
          5 years, 4 months ago

          Think I’d give D a go

          1. Super Sharpe Shooter
            • 9 Years
            5 years, 4 months ago

            Yeah D for me (pending team news/injuries this evening in Europa). Leeds are off-colour and Dallas is in the back 4 again.

  3. aleksios
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Anything worth a hit here? 0.6itb.

    --Martinez
    --Dias--Targett--Digne--Cresswell
    --Salah--KDB--Gundo--Raphinia
    --Kane--DCL

    --Johnstone--Bam--Dallas--Lingard.

    Maybe Salah to Bruno and captain him?

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      GTG

  4. Dion D's Solo Shower
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Start Rudiger or Bamford?

    Benching Raph for what it's worth..

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      I would play Raphinha over Bamford.

      1. Dion D's Solo Shower
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        But would you play Raphinha over Rudiger then?

        1. Tonyawesome69
          • 7 Years
          5 years, 4 months ago

          Probably yes. Raphinha ceiling is higher than Rudiger's 6 CS points. Leeds should give Chelsea a good game

          1. Eastman
            • 8 Years
            5 years, 4 months ago

            Raph must be due a haul soon

          2. @persecuted_by_mods
            5 years, 4 months ago

            With how awful Leeds are at set pieces I wouldn't rule out a CB scoring

            1. Tonyawesome69
              • 7 Years
              5 years, 4 months ago

              It is a good point but can't see it being Rudiger. 0 goals this season

  5. Captain_Shirokov
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Martinez
    Digne(c), Pereira, Cancelo, Dias
    Bruno, Son, Gundogan, Raphinha
    Kane(vc), DCL

    (Areola, Bamford, Dallas, Lingard)

    Good to go? Saving a free transfer.

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      GTG

      1. Captain_Shirokov
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        cheers mate

    2. Boom XhakaLacaSaka
      • 6 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Pereira a better captain then digne imo if your going for differential

  6. JELLYFISH
    • 14 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Start Martinez or Pickford?

    Leaning towards Martinez if Matty Cash is back.

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Martinez

  7. Chandler Bing
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Trossard or Gross?

    1. TheBiffas
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      i think gross is on pens?

    2. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Neither

  8. TheBiffas
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    gw 29 team:

    Martinez
    Dallas Reguilon
    Raphinha Bale Lingard
    Kane Watkins

    any of these worth a -4 in 29?

    A) stones -> dunk / targett / other
    B) bruno -> son / auba
    C) DCL -> bamford / antonio

    1. Chandler Bing
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      I'd do A with Veltman tbh

      1. TheBiffas
        • 5 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        money no object, do u prefer veltman to dunk?

        1. Tonyawesome69
          • 7 Years
          5 years, 4 months ago

          Dunk vs Veltman over the last 5 games

          Shots in the box: 4 - 7
          Big chances: 0 - 2
          xG: 0.36 - 1.22
          Big chances created: 0 - 2
          xA: 0.25 - 1.08
          Price: 4.9 - 4.3

          https://twitter.com/FPL_Swe/status/1369935181503729665?s=19

  9. Boom XhakaLacaSaka
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    1.8 itb 1 ft

    Martinez
    Konsa Dias Stones
    Salah (vc) Bruno Gundo Saka
    Kane (c) DCL Bamford
    Mccarthy Lookman Mee Robinson

    Gtg and save a free for 29?

    1. The Final Boss
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Yes

    2. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      GTG

  10. The Final Boss
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Guys need suggestions

    Martinez
    Dias cancelo digne
    Salah Bruno gund raph
    Bamford dcl kane

    Areola dallas lowton lingard

    A) salah to son free
    B) save and do salah cancelo dcl to son Creswell Watkins -4

    TIA.

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      B - You already have Kane and Spurs have a tough fixture against Arsenal. Give Salah one last game against Wolves

  11. Chandler Bing
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    GW29 team without hits. Would you use FH?

    Areola
    Reguilon Veltman
    Son Raphina Gross
    Kane Watkins

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      No but you are 1-2 players from WHU and Dallas which could hurt you

    2. @persecuted_by_mods
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Depends, do you think you can squeeze more out of it another time in terms of points?

      This FH wouldn't just be for 3 extra players, assuming you'd switch some of the existing ones, not only that but the transfers you'd use to get the last few of those can be used for future planning if you FH

      I would play it probably

      1. Eastman
        • 8 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        Thanks. Think I’ll shift him with gw29 in mind

  12. Eastman
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Is Holding now out of the Arsenal starting 11?

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Looks like it. Been on the bench the last 2 games since coming back from concussion protocol

  13. Corona is not good 4 U
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    What to do with this horror show?

    Mc. Carthy (Pope)
    Dias, Stones, Digne, Targett (Coufal)
    Gündogan, Salah, Fernandes, Raphinha (Barnes)
    Kane, Calvert-Lewin (Vydra)

    1 free transfer and 0.0 in the bank.

    Thank you!

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Roll FT

    2. hammerman3000
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      First of all get Barnes out of there. You will probably need to take some hits so i would also move off from Salah unless you're committed to holding him. You have 4 GW29 players which isnt a great position (i think the average will be 8) - You can go from Salah to Bale and own a key differential which is nice. with Barnes you need to evaluate whether you value having some money to spend across your team. Son, Saka, Mahrez, Foden and Mount would be the other replacements i would be looking at. hope this helps 🙂

  14. LewanGOALski
    • 14 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Martinez
    Dias - Digne - Burn
    Sterling - Bruno - Gundo - Lookman
    Kane - Vardy - DCL

    Dallas - Aina - H.Barnes

    Have 2 FTs and 0.1 itb

    How is this plan looking?
    GW28: Sterling ➡ Bale and save 1 FT
    GW29: Barnes & Vardy ➡ Son & Bamford/Antonio for 2 FTs

    Or should I reverse it to keep Sterling vs Fulham..?

    1. TheBiffas
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      great plans

    2. @persecuted_by_mods
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Barnes to Son not possible without Vardy downgrade I'm assuming? Tough one, I'd reverse

    3. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      It is annoying that you have 2FTs. If you had 1 I would have advised to roll and you need to downgrade somewhere to sort out Barnes. Probably stick with the plan even though I can see Sterling starting against Fulham

  15. TheBiffas
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    money no object, best 3 gw29 defenders?

    1. @persecuted_by_mods
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Goalonso Rudiger Digne

      1. Tonyawesome69
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        If only they were playing in 29

      2. @persecuted_by_mods
        5 years, 4 months ago

        Apologies you said 29, slim pickings there reguilon

    2. Boss Hogg
      • 16 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      For 29...

      Dunk
      Reguilon
      Cresswell

    3. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Cresswell, Dallas and Veltmann/Adarabioyo/Andersen

  16. vincentwsho
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Bench one of Gundo, Shaw or DCL?

    Currently benching Shaw, but considering Gundo (possible cameo, VS Ful defense) or DCL (position switch)

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Shaw

  17. UnitednationsXI
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    couple of quick questions

    1) Captain Kane or Salah?
    2) Who to bench from Raphinha, Konsa, Bamford?

    1. TheBiffas
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      bench konsa, cap kane

    2. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Kane Bamford

  18. Eastman
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Best defender 4.5 or less. Thinking Dawson (have Cresswell) or any better with 29 in mind. Have Aina. Thanks.

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      There are a number of good cheap options. Dawson, Veltmann, Adarabioyo and Andersen. Not sure which one I would go for

    2. TheBiffas
      • 5 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      veltman imo

  19. The Philosopher
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Thinking of taking a punt on Vardy (c) this week. Anyone else?

    1. Tonyawesome69
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Risky, he doesn't have the form

    2. @persecuted_by_mods
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Good a fixture as any

    3. House Frey Wedding Planner
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Agree his form has not been great. VC for me behind Bruno

  20. House Frey Wedding Planner
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    What are the strategies for those free hitting in gw29 that would set you apart from the rest?

    With 4 fixtures it is easy to put out any combo of available players...

    Triple Spurs attack?
    Triple Brighton defence?
    Go heavy on Leeds assets?
    All of the above?
    Any other suggestion?

    1. Moderately content penguin
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Leeds have blanked in 3 of the last 4.
      Fulham have kept a cs in 3 of the last 4

      There's a strategy for you.

      1. House Frey Wedding Planner
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        Good shout that for Fulham defenders

        1. Moderately content penguin
          • 7 Years
          5 years, 4 months ago

          Leeds are also fairly rubbish at defending set pieces - Dawson last week just the latest concession - the Fulham CBs have a plausible opportunity for an attacking return too.

  21. Deulofail
    • 10 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Can anyone explain how Arsene's proposal on the offside rule would change anything about the difficulty of measuring the millimetres? https://youtu.be/PiD_s4_CExU?t=67

    1. Deulofail
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Same for Graeme Souness' view, which he thinks would take away grey areas. I don't understand how the grey areas and millimeter-measurements would be made easier or reduced.

      1. Moderately content penguin
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        The only way I think it could work that way would be if defenders became much more conservative in trying to play offside and staying clearly behind the attacker.

        But even then the chances are it would only reduce the number of close decisions - the really narrow ones would still exist in millimetres

        1. Deulofail
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 4 months ago

          Reducing the number of close decisions isn't a good thing imo. Fewer injustices, but each injustice is more injusticey. 😀

          I can see how these are designed to produce more goals, as Q says below, but Arsenal, pundits, and people, in general, think this solves any VAR or offside issues is beyond me.

          1. Deulofail
            • 10 Years
            5 years, 4 months ago

            but why Arsene*

          2. Moderately content penguin
            • 7 Years
            5 years, 4 months ago

            I personally see the logic of the Arsene proposal especially taken in conjunction with the zero tolerance of ball to hand in disallowing goals - that just doesn't add up.

            It is still the case isn't it that there is zero tolerance for attackers but not defenders?

            1. Deulofail
              • 10 Years
              5 years, 4 months ago

              I don't see the relevance of handball in the logic of the offside rule, sorry. What 's the logic? I thought you agreed that the issue of measuring the millimetres would remain?

              1. Moderately content penguin
                • 7 Years
                5 years, 4 months ago

                Oh I agree with your millimetres point. That I think is irreducible with VAR technology unless you introduce a margin for error. Bur even then you'll probably end up with disputes over the margin for error and whether it was inside it by millimetres

                If the forward cannot use the part of his body offside to score a goal why should that be offside? Even if it hit it accidentally it would be a foul.

                1. Deulofail
                  • 10 Years
                  5 years, 4 months ago

                  See my long comment below on a 'margin of error'. You still need to measure it, so the problem remains, unless I'm confused about it.

    2. Deulofail
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Paraphrased Arsene: "Maybe you're not offside as long as any part of your body that you can score with is in-line with the defender, rather than you're offside if any part of your body that you can score with is in front of the defender. That would sort out, maybe, all these discussions about millimeters of part of your body being in front of a defender."

      Yes, but the millimeter discussions would simply change to being about whether someone is 'in-line' or 'behind' the defender or not. I don't understaaannnnd wahhhhh

      1. Nuka Girl
        • 9 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        You're right.
        Still millimetres, but this way you additionally have to work out which part of body.
        I personally like the idea of going by where the feet are. That way doesn't matter if you're leaning forward.

        1. @persecuted_by_mods
          5 years, 4 months ago

          Yeah and it would be easier to draw line boot to boot, body is weird shirts can comfort sleeve lines can ride up or down

        2. Deulofail
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 4 months ago

          Good suggestion to limit the body part, but the millimetres issue is still an issue, and you still have to decide where the ankle starts.

    3. @persecuted_by_mods
      5 years, 4 months ago

      It wouldn't, and would result in the ridiculous scenario of a player being blatantly offside like 99.999% of his body and having 0.001% of his heel in line with the defender and it being given as a goal

      I'm all for goals, and if that's the rule then that's the new rule but fans would be fuming every time it happened imo

      1. @persecuted_by_mods
        5 years, 4 months ago

        I think what Wenger is really pushing for is a simple flip where it favours the attacker, I can see big support for it until it actually gets put into practice then I can see rage from the teams it goes against

    4. Deulofail
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Souness paraphrased: "We should change it to: if any part of the striker is onside [...] we should allow the goal to stand. And it would take away a lot of the grey areas. The majority of them."

    5. Wrong Captain Choice - Ag i…
      • 17 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      It would stop goals which being disallowed because of a shoulder, arm etc offside.

      Personally I think both lads Wenger and Souness are talking some sense.

      1. Pasqualinho
        • 17 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        I’m a big advocate of some of this, but I would just go for the attackers feet. I don’t think someone leaning offside (or in some cases pointing offside) should be offside. But someone standing or running from an offside position should be. It’s much simpler.

      2. Deulofail
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        It doesn't propose a change to the definition of which body parts can score a goal, nor does it say that it doesn't matter. Arsene says "any part of your body that you can score with is in-line with the defender" .... that includes your shoulder/sleeve.

    6. GreennRed
      • 14 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      If a players feet are onside or level with the last opposing player he should be deemed to be onside regardless if his head, arms, hips etc are a millimetre offside. Was it not the spirit of the offside rule to stop the attacker lurking offside to gain an advantage on the defender, to get to the passed ball quicker? He's only getting there quicker if his feet are offside but wrongly deemed to be onside. His upper body being offside isn't such an advantage for me. Maybe defending could improve too?

    7. Deulofail
      • 10 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Regarding VAR and offside. I've always maintained that VAR shouldn't be used if it's not fit for purpose.

      The way it's currently used for offside is a joke, and not fit for purpose, so it shouldn't be use (like this).

      However, I do think it might be possible to have a fair and consistent way to decide whether someone is considered offside using the current technology. If my proposal isn't fit for purpose, either, or any other, then I don't think the technology should be used.

      I actually see the measurement of body parts to be a secondary issue. I think a VAR can take a reasonable stab at that without too much crazy inconsistency.

      The factors that contribute more to the inaccuracy, imo, are.

      1) measuring the distance to the floor (I'm ignorant about this - it could be that they have a clever way to do it), since this can greatly change the line across the pitch.

      2) Choosing the frame at which the ball was kicked with a relatively low frame rate (or at any frame rate, anyway), since the players can move more than millimeters away from each other in a frame (or several frames, since you have to decide when the ball is struck).

      I don't know how to solve 1, and I don't believe that it would be solved by limiting offside to the feet, since the toeas and heels can be off the ground, and we don't have the tech to cope with that, any more than we do a head. Plus, feet can hang out in the air too, and you still need to define where the ankle starts, and pick out the studs on the camera, etc.

      2, however, could be combatted by using a margin of error. Not in the same way that I think many here may envision it, which is simply to define a range of onsidedness within the current range of offsidedness (this not combatting the issue of measuring the millimetres). Rather to take the frame at which the ball is considered 'struck, and then the frame before and afterwards. If the attacker is considered onside in any of these frames, then he is considered onside overall. Generally speaking, I think this will allow marginal calls to be taken as offside, assuming there is any amount of lateral movement between players on the screen. It also gives the advantage to the attacker, which seems to be a winning phrase with the pundits and public. The only issue is the time it would take to do. Some of this could be automated, but again, if the tech isn't up to the task, then it's not ready.

      1. Deulofail
        • 10 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        Generally speaking, I think this will allow marginal calls to be taken as *****onside*****

      2. Moderately content penguin
        • 7 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        That makes a huge amount of sense to me

        Ignorant query. How fixed are frame rates? Do they cover a particular period of time or are they relatively random - depending on where the producer "cuts". My entirely ignorant supposition is that with modern technology the play can be cut at any given point.

        1. Deulofail
          • 10 Years
          5 years, 4 months ago

          I believe TV typically uses 25 frames per second in UK and 24 in US. However, unbeknownst to me, apparently, "VAR uses cameras than run at 50 frames per second, with one picture taken every 0.02 seconds." I wasn't aware of this, and I presume it means that VAR only use set cameras for offside, unless all the football video is captured at 50fps. I can't be bothered to research.

          Anyway, yeah, so the VAR has to select 1 of these pictures to use to draw their lines. https://twitter.com/ben_rumsby/status/1163001872367702017

          1. Deulofail
            • 10 Years
            5 years, 4 months ago

            Okay so I think all broadcast cameras are operating at 50fps. Makes sense. Better for slo-mo replays and VAR. But still, they are pictures. You can't pause real-life; you can only select a picture from the 50 available slices each second.

            1. Deulofail
              • 10 Years
              5 years, 4 months ago

              I don't really understand it myself, but they are confident in their solution to problem (1).

          2. Moderately content penguin
            • 7 Years
            5 years, 4 months ago

            That seems like a remarkably short time frame.

            I like your logic here but wonder whether one frame either side is what we need. I have no idea whether play moves on sufficiently in 0.02 of a second to make any odds.

            I'd take your principle and then try and work out how many frames needed to be looked at. I'm guessing it's pretty random in determining at which point the ball was kicked if you are looking at 0.02 of a second.

  22. Neves say Neves
    • 8 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Martinez
    Dias Stones Digne
    Salah Son Gundo Raphinha Soucek
    Kane Watkins

    Pope Bamford Coufal Dallas
    1FT 3.3 ITB

    A)Hold
    B) Salah > Auba/Bale
    C) Stones > Brighton or Chelsea def
    D) Other?

    Thanks! Think I’ve Gott my benching order correct too

  23. Wrong Captain Choice - Ag i…
    • 17 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    General question given Chelsea's nice run of fixtures coming up (after gw30) and their clear form which Chelsea players should I be targeting.

    I was thinking top three: Azpiliceuta, Christiansen, Mount ?

    Is Havertz in the mix now?

    Or is there any other player I should consider Jorginho???

    1. Hazz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Despite playing brilliantly, I wouldn't recommend Christensen just yet. Silva is back now and can easily slot in.

      Azpi & Mount are decent picks.

      Wouldn't consider Jorginho, you'll only get the occasional penalty. Also, Mount took one recently too - last pen Jorginho too was when Mount was off the pitch, so can't say who is definitely first choice. Assume still Jorginho but you never know.

      Havertz could be. Too early to tell. They'll be attacker rotation and that puts me off.

      1. Wrong Captain Choice - Ag i…
        • 17 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        I completely forgot about silva. It seems Cancelo to Azipilicueta will be an easy switch for many.

    2. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Rudiger is still nailed imo. Rested this past week but has started 8/9.

      Havertz is blinking on the radar. Considering him if he can start the next few PL games. Might buy him for GW30 vs WBA.

      1. Wrong Captain Choice - Ag i…
        • 17 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        Good point I checked and Rudiger had a very long run of games from gw19-26.

        The fact he is German and now has a German manager is another reason to consider him.

        Tempted with the Rudiger and Azpilicueta double up in defence and maybe Mount in midfield.

  24. FPL Scoop
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Right... am I good to roll the FT & 3.2 ITB this week? Can then get a few more for BGW29, and then WC soon after... 🙂

    Martinez
    Cancelo Stones Digne
    Bruno Son Bale Gundogan
    Kane(c) DCL Watkins
    ——————
    3.9 Raphinha Dallas Johnson

    Currently have 8 for the BGW if Johnson plays

  25. DALEDOBACK
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Salah and Mee to Bale and Digne for free?

  26. Master Frieza
    • 5 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Preferred/ better duo... Sterling+Jota ..or Salah+Gundogan

    1. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Gundogan, Salah and it's not close imo.

    2. The White Pele
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      don't buy Sterling. EVER!

  27. House Frey Wedding Planner
    • 7 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    I'd say Mount plus 1 defender

    1. House Frey Wedding Planner
      • 7 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Reply fail - meant as a reply to the Chelsea Q a couple of posts above

    2. Wrong Captain Choice - Ag i…
      • 17 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Thanks - makes sense. Would like Christainsen to become a permanent fixture in the side. Would make it a lot easier.

  28. tinear
    • 6 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Martinez
    Cancelo Stones Digne Veltman
    Salah Bruno Son Gundo
    Kane DCL

    3.9 Coufal Bamford Bissouma
    2ft 0.1itb

    Tempted to ship Salah but for who?
    Or should I just burn the transfer?

    1. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 16 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      Your team is in good knick.

      I'd probably think about doing Salah > Bale.

      1. tinear
        • 6 Years
        5 years, 4 months ago

        Scared that Salah might bite me back but this is the good time to ship after long weeks of patience.

  29. Tshelby
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    A or B?

    A) Mee -> Veltman (next week get Kane and Son)
    B) Mee, Salah, Watkins -> Kane, Son, Veltman (-4) keep Sterling. Have the exact cash

    The team:
    2ft - 1.1 itb

    Martinez
    Shaw, Dias, Mee, Coufal, Dallas
    Lingard, Salah*, Bruno, sterling*, Gundogan
    Watkins, Antonio, Bamford

    (1)

  30. Kane Train
    • 11 Years
    5 years, 4 months ago

    Anyone else saving their FREE HIT for gameweek 33

    1. The White Pele
      • 8 Years
      5 years, 4 months ago

      yep